1
|
Ravari ME, Nasseri S, Mohammadi M, Behmadi M, Ghiasi-Shirazi SK, Momennezhad M. Deep-learning Method for the Prediction of Three-Dimensional Dose Distribution for Left Breast Cancer Conformal Radiation Therapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:e666-e675. [PMID: 37741713 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Revised: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/25/2023]
Abstract
AIMS An increase in the demand of a new generation of radiotherapy planning systems based on learning approaches has been reported. At this stage, the new approach is able to improve the planning speed while saving a reasonable level of plan quality, compared with available planning systems. We believe that new achievements, such as deep-learning models, will be able to review the issue from a different point of view. MATERIALS AND METHODS The data of 120 breast cancer patients were used to train and test the three-dimensional U-Res-Net model. The network input was computed tomography images and patients' contouring, while the patients' dose distribution was addressed as the output of the model proposed. The predicted dose distributions, created by the model for 10 test patients, were then compared with corresponding dose distributions calculated by a reliable treatment planning system. In particular, the dice similarity coefficients for different isodose volumes, dose difference and mean absolute errors (MAE) for all voxels inside the body, Dmean, D98%, D50%, D2%, V95% for planning target volume and organs at risk were calculated and were statistically analysed with the paired-samples t-test. RESULTS The average dose difference for all patients and voxels in body was 0.60 ± 2.81%. The MAE varied from 3.85 ± 6.65% to 8.06 ± 10.00%. The average MAE for test cases was 5.71 ± 1.19%. The average dice similarity coefficients for isodose volumes was 0.91 ± 0.03. The three-dimensional gamma passing rates with 3 mm/3% criteria varied from 78.99% to 97.58% for planning target volume and organs at risk, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The investigation showed that a deep-learning model can be applied to predict the three-dimensional dose distribution with optimal accuracy and precision for patients with left breast cancer. As further study, the model can be extended to predict dose distribution in other cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M E Ravari
- Medical Physics Department, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Sh Nasseri
- Medical Physics Department, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran; Medical Physics Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - M Mohammadi
- Department of Medical Physics, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - M Behmadi
- Cancer Research Center, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran; Medical Physics Department, Faculty of Medicine, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran
| | - S K Ghiasi-Shirazi
- Department of Computer Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
| | - M Momennezhad
- Medical Physics Department, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran; Nuclear Medicine Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Liu S, Chapman KL, Berry SL, Bertini J, Ma R, Fu Y, Yang D, Moran JM, Della-Biancia C. Implementation of a knowledge-based decision support system for treatment plan auditing through automation. Med Phys 2023; 50:6978-6989. [PMID: 37211898 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Revised: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Independent auditing is a necessary component of a comprehensive quality assurance (QA) program and can also be utilized for continuous quality improvement (QI) in various radiotherapy processes. Two senior physicists at our institution have been performing a time intensive manual audit of cross-campus treatment plans annually, with the aim of further standardizing our planning procedures, updating policies and guidelines, and providing training opportunities of all staff members. PURPOSE A knowledge-based automated anomaly-detection algorithm to provide decision support and strengthen our manual retrospective plan auditing process was developed. This standardized and improved the efficiency of the assessment of our external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) treatment planning across all eight campuses of our institution. METHODS A total of 843 external beam radiotherapy plans for 721 lung patients from January 2020 to March 2021 were automatically acquired from our clinical treatment planning and management systems. From each plan, 44 parameters were automatically extracted and pre-processed. A knowledge-based anomaly detection algorithm, namely, "isolation forest" (iForest), was then applied to the plan dataset. An anomaly score was determined for each plan using recursive partitioning mechanism. Top 20 plans ranked with the highest anomaly scores for each treatment technique (2D/3D/IMRT/VMAT/SBRT) including auto-populated parameters were used to guide the manual auditing process and validated by two plan auditors. RESULTS The two auditors verified that 75.6% plans with the highest iForest anomaly scores have similar concerning qualities that may lead to actionable recommendations for our planning procedures and staff training materials. The time to audit a chart was approximately 20.8 min on average when done manually and 14.0 min when done with the iForest guidance. Approximately 6.8 min were saved per chart with the iForest method. For our typical internal audit review of 250 charts annually, the total time savings are approximately 30 hr per year. CONCLUSION iForest effectively detects anomalous plans and strengthens our cross-campus manual plan auditing procedure by adding decision support and further improve standardization. Due to the use of automation, this method was efficient and will be used to establish a standard plan auditing procedure, which could occur more frequently.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shi Liu
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Katherine L Chapman
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sean L Berry
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Julian Bertini
- Committee on Medical Physics, Biological Science Division, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Rongtao Ma
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Yabo Fu
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Deshan Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jean M Moran
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Cesar Della-Biancia
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jiao Z, Peng X, Wang Y, Xiao J, Nie D, Wu X, Wang X, Zhou J, Shen D. TransDose: Transformer-based radiotherapy dose prediction from CT images guided by super-pixel-level GCN classification. Med Image Anal 2023; 89:102902. [PMID: 37482033 DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2023.102902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2022] [Revised: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023]
Abstract
Radiotherapy is a mainstay treatment for cancer in clinic. An excellent radiotherapy treatment plan is always based on a high-quality dose distribution map which is produced by repeated manual trial-and-errors of experienced experts. To accelerate the radiotherapy planning process, many automatic dose distribution prediction methods have been proposed recently and achieved considerable fruits. Nevertheless, these methods require certain auxiliary inputs besides CT images, such as segmentation masks of the tumor and organs at risk (OARs), which limits their prediction efficiency and application potential. To address this issue, we design a novel approach named as TransDose for dose distribution prediction that treats CT images as the unique input in this paper. Specifically, instead of inputting the segmentation masks to provide the prior anatomical information, we utilize a super-pixel-based graph convolutional network (GCN) to extract category-specific features, thereby compensating the network for the necessary anatomical knowledge. Besides, considering the strong continuous dependency between adjacent CT slices as well as adjacent dose maps, we embed the Transformer into the backbone, and make use of its superior ability of long-range sequence modeling to endow input features with inter-slice continuity message. To our knowledge, this is the first network that specially designed for the task of dose prediction from only CT images without ignoring necessary anatomical structure. Finally, we evaluate our model on two real datasets, and extensive experiments demonstrate the generalizability and advantages of our method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhengyang Jiao
- School of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xingchen Peng
- Department of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yan Wang
- School of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
| | - Jianghong Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Dong Nie
- Department of Computer Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA
| | - Xi Wu
- School of Computer Science, Chengdu University of Information Technology, China
| | | | - Jiliu Zhou
- School of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Dinggang Shen
- School of Biomedical Engineering, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China, and Shanghai United Imaging Intelligence Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gu X, Strijbis VIJ, Slotman BJ, Dahele MR, Verbakel WFAR. Dose distribution prediction for head-and-neck cancer radiotherapy using a generative adversarial network: influence of input data. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1251132. [PMID: 37829347 PMCID: PMC10565853 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1251132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose A three-dimensional deep generative adversarial network (GAN) was used to predict dose distributions for locally advanced head and neck cancer radiotherapy. Given the labor- and time-intensive nature of manual planning target volume (PTV) and organ-at-risk (OAR) segmentation, we investigated whether dose distributions could be predicted without the need for fully segmented datasets. Materials and methods GANs were trained/validated/tested using 320/30/35 previously segmented CT datasets and treatment plans. The following input combinations were used to train and test the models: CT-scan only (C); CT+PTVboost/elective (CP); CT+PTVs+OARs+body structure (CPOB); PTVs+OARs+body structure (POB); PTVs+body structure (PB). Mean absolute errors (MAEs) for the predicted dose distribution and mean doses to individual OARs (individual salivary glands, individual swallowing structures) were analyzed. Results For the five models listed, MAEs were 7.3 Gy, 3.5 Gy, 3.4 Gy, 3.4 Gy, and 3.5 Gy, respectively, without significant differences among CP-CPOB, CP-POB, CP-PB, among CPOB-POB. Dose volume histograms showed that all four models that included PTV contours predicted dose distributions that had a high level of agreement with clinical treatment plans. The best model CPOB and the worst model PB (except model C) predicted mean dose to within ±3 Gy of the clinical dose, for 82.6%/88.6%/82.9% and 71.4%/67.1%/72.2% of all OARs, parotid glands (PG), and submandibular glands (SMG), respectively. The R2 values (0.17/0.96/0.97/0.95/0.95) of OAR mean doses for each model also indicated that except for model C, the predictions correlated highly with the clinical dose distributions. Interestingly model C could reasonably predict the dose in eight patients, but on average, it performed inadequately. Conclusion We demonstrated the influence of the CT scan, and PTV and OAR contours on dose prediction. Model CP was not statistically different from model CPOB and represents the minimum data statistically required to adequately predict the clinical dose distribution in a group of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaojin Gu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Victor I. J. Strijbis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ben J. Slotman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Max R. Dahele
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Wilko F. A. R. Verbakel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hooshangnejad H, Miles D, Hill C, Narang A, Ding K, Han-Oh S. Inter-Breath-Hold Geometric and Dosimetric Variations in Organs at Risk during Pancreatic Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: Implications for Adaptive Radiation Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4332. [PMID: 37686608 PMCID: PMC10486406 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15174332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Revised: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death, with nearly 60,000 cases each year and less than a 10% 5-year overall survival rate. Radiation therapy (RT) is highly beneficial as a local-regional anticancer treatment. As anatomical variation is of great concern, motion management techniques, such as DIBH, are commonly used to minimize OARs toxicities; however, the variability between DIBHs has not been well studied. Here, we present an unprecedented systematic analysis of patients' anatomical reproducibility over multiple DIBH motion-management technique uses for pancreatic cancer RT. We used data from 20 patients; four DIBH scans were available for each patient to design 80 SBRT plans. Our results demonstrated that (i) there is considerable variation in OAR geometry and dose between same-subject DIBH scans; (ii) the RT plan designed for one scan may not be directly applicable to another scan; (iii) the RT treatment designed using a DIBH simulation CT results in different dosimetry in the DIBH treatment delivery; and (iv) this confirms the importance of adaptive radiation therapy (ART), such as MR-Linacs, for pancreatic RT delivery. The ART treatment delivery technique can account for anatomical variation between referenced and scheduled plans, and thus avoid toxicities of OARs because of anatomical variations between DIBH patient setups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamed Hooshangnejad
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; (D.M.); (C.H.); (A.N.); (K.D.)
| | - Devin Miles
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; (D.M.); (C.H.); (A.N.); (K.D.)
| | - Colin Hill
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; (D.M.); (C.H.); (A.N.); (K.D.)
| | - Amol Narang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; (D.M.); (C.H.); (A.N.); (K.D.)
| | - Kai Ding
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; (D.M.); (C.H.); (A.N.); (K.D.)
| | - Sarah Han-Oh
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; (D.M.); (C.H.); (A.N.); (K.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jia Q, Zheng C, Li Y, Guo F, Zhou L, Song T. A predicted three-dimensional dose sequence based treatment planning optimization method for gynecologic IMRT. Med Eng Phys 2023; 118:104011. [PMID: 37536834 DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2023.104011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Revised: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023]
Abstract
In knowledge-based treatment planning (KBTP) for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), the quality of the plan is dependent on the sophistication of the predicted dosimetric information and its application. In this paper, we propose a KBTP method that based on the effective and reasonable utilization of a three-dimensional (3D) dose prediction on planning optimization. We used an organs-at-risk (OARs) dose distribution prediction model to create a voxel-based dose sequence based optimization objective for OARs doses. This objective was used to reformulate a traditional fluence map optimization model, which involves a tolerable spatial re-assignment of the predicted dose distribution to the OAR voxels based on their current doses' positions at a sorted dose sequencing. The feasibility of this method was evaluated with ten gynecology (GYN) cancer IMRT cases by comparing its generated plan quality with the original clinical plan. Results showed feasible plan by proposed method, with comparable planning target volume (PTV) dose coverage and greater dose sparing of the OARs. Among ten GYN cases, the average V30 and V45 of rectum were decreased by 4%±4% (p = 0.02) and 4%±3% (p<0.01), respectively. V30 and V45 of bladder were decreased by 8%±2% (p<0.01) and 3%±2% (p<0.01), respectively. Our predicted dose sequence-based planning optimization method for GYN IMRT offered a flexible use of predicted 3D doses while ensuring the output plan consistency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiyuan Jia
- Department of Radiotherapy Technology, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315310, China; School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510515, China
| | - Chuancheng Zheng
- Department of Radiotherapy Technology, Ningbo No.2 Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315310, China
| | - Yongbao Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, China
| | - Futong Guo
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510515, China
| | - Linghong Zhou
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510515, China.
| | - Ting Song
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510515, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Saha S, Sriram Prasath S, Arun B, Kalita SJ, Elavarasan N, Guha Adhya D, Sarkar A, Arunsingh M, Chakraborty S, Mallick I. ICON-P - A double-blind evaluation of quality improvements with individualized CONstraints from low-cost knowledge-based radiation therapy planning in prostate cancer. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol 2023; 26:100206. [PMID: 37274093 PMCID: PMC10232660 DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2023.100206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 03/11/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose /Objective(S)A low-cost, prior knowledge-based individualized dose-constraint generator for organs-at-risk has been developed for prostate cancer radiation therapy (RT) planning. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the feasibility and improvements in organs-at-risk (OAR) doses in prostate cancer RT planning using this tool served on a web application. Materials And Methods A set of previously treated prostate cancer cases planned and treated with generic constraints were replanned using individualized dose constraints derived from a library of cases with similar volumes of target, OAR, and overlap regions and served on the web-based application. The goal was to assess the reduction in mean dose, specified dose volumes (V59Gy, V56Gy, V53Gy, V47Gy, and V40Gy), and generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD) to the rectum and bladder. Planners and assessors were blinded to the initial achieved doses and penalties. Sample size estimation was based on improvement in V53Gy for the rectum and bladder with a paired evaluation. Results Twenty-four patients were replanned. All the plans had a PTV D95 of at least 97% of the prescribed dose. The individualized OAR constraints could be met for 87.5% of patients for all dose levels. The mean dose, V59Gy, V53Gy, and V47Gy for the bladder was reduced by 7.5 Gy, 1.12%, 5.51%, and 10.53% respectively. Similarly for the rectum, the mean dose, V59Gy, V53Gy, V47Gy and was reduced by 5.5 Gy, 4.34%, 6.97%, and 11.61% respectively. All dose reductions were statistically significant. The gEUD of the bladder was reduced by 2.47 Gy (p < 0.001) and the rectum by 3.21 Gy (p < 0.001). Conclusion Treatment planning based on individualized dose constraints served on a web application is feasible and leads to improvement at clinically important dose volumes in prostate cancer RT planning. This application can be served publicly for improvements in RT plan quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saheli Saha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, India
| | - S Sriram Prasath
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, India
| | - Balakrishnan Arun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, India
| | | | | | - Debashree Guha Adhya
- School of Medical Science and Technology, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, India
| | - Arnab Sarkar
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institution of Technology (BHU) Varanasi, India
| | - Moses Arunsingh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, India
| | | | - Indranil Mallick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, India
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tang C, Gong C, Liu B, Guo H, Dai Z, Yuan J, Wang X, Zhang Y. Feasibility and dosimetric evaluation of single- and multi-isocentre stereotactic body radiation therapy for multiple liver metastases. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1144784. [PMID: 37188200 PMCID: PMC10175834 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1144784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives Single-isocentre volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) improves treatment efficiency and patient compliance for patients with multiple liver metastases (MLM). However, the potential increase in dose spillage to normal liver tissue using a single-isocentre technique has not yet been studied. We comprehensively evaluated the quality of single- and multi-isocentre VMAT-SBRT for MLM and propose a RapidPlan-based automatic planning (AP) approach for MLM SBRT. Methods A total of 30 patients with MLM (two or three lesions) were selected for this retrospective study. We manually replanned all patients treated with MLM SBRT by using the single-isocentre (MUS) and multi-isocentre (MUM) techniques. Then, we randomly selected 20 MUS and MUM plans for training to generate the single-isocentre RapidPlan model (RPS) and the multi-isocentre RapidPlan model (RPM). Finally, we used data from the remaining 10 patients to validate RPS and RPM. Results Compared with MUS, MUM reduced the mean dose delivered to the right kidney by 0.3 Gy. The mean liver dose (MLD) was 2.3 Gy higher for MUS compared with MUM. However, the monitor units, delivery time, and V20Gy of normal liver (liver-gross tumour volume) for MUM were significantly higher than for MUS. Based on validation, RPS and RPM slightly improved the MLD, V20Gy, normal tissue complications, and dose sparing to the right and left kidneys and spinal cord compared with manual plans (MUS vs RPS and MUM vs RPM), but RPS and RPM significantly increased monitor units and delivery time. Conclusions The single-isocentre VMAT-SBRT approach could be used for MLM to reduce treatment time and patient comfort at the cost of a small increase in the MLD. Compared with the manual plans, RapidPlan-based plans, especially RPS, have slightly improved quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chunbo Tang
- Department of Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China
| | - Changfei Gong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, Nanchang, China
- *Correspondence: Changfei Gong, ; Yun Zhang,
| | - Biaoshui Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hailiang Guo
- Department of Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China
| | - Zhongyang Dai
- Department of Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China
| | - Jun Yuan
- Department of Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China
| | - Xiaoping Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, Nanchang, China
| | - Yun Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, Nanchang, China
- *Correspondence: Changfei Gong, ; Yun Zhang,
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Knowledge-based planning using both the predicted DVH of organ-at risk and planning target volume. Med Eng Phys 2022; 110:103803. [PMID: 35461772 DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2022.103803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2021] [Revised: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of a knowledge-based planning (KBP) method in nasopharyngeal cancer radiotherapy using the predicted dose-volume histogram (DVH) of organ-at risk (OAR) and planning target volume (PTV). METHODS AND MATERIALS A total of 85 patients previously treated for nasopharyngeal cancer using 9-field 6-MV intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) were identified for training and 30 similar patients were identified for testing. The dosimetric deposition information, individual dose-volume histograms (IDVHs) induced by a series of fields with uniform-intensity irradiation, was used to predict both OAR and PTV DVH. Two KBP methods (KBPOAR and KBPOAR+PTV) were established for plan generation based on the DVH prediction. The KBPOAR method utilized the dose constraints based on the predicted OAR DVH and the PTV dose constraints obtained according to the planning experience, while the KBPOAR+PTV method applied the dose constraints based on the predicted OAR and PTV DVH. For the plan evaluation, the PTV dose coverage was used D98 and D2, and the maximum dose, mean dose or dose-volume parameters were used for the OARs. Statistical differences of the two KBP methods were tested with the Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS For patients with T3 tumors, there was no significant difference between the KBPOAR and KBPOAR+PTV methods in dosimetric results at most OARs and PTVs. Both KBP methods achieved a similar number of plans meeting the dose requirements. For patients with T4 tumors, KBPOAR+PTV reduced the maximum dose by more than 1 Gy in the body, spinal cord, optic nerve, eye and temporal lobes and reduced the V50 value by more than 3.9% in the larynx and tongue without reducing the PTV dose compared with KBPOAR. The KBPOAR+PTV method increased the plans by more than 14.2% in meeting the maximum dose requirements at the body, optic nerve, mandible and eye and increased the plans by more than 21.4% in meeting the V50 of the larynx and V50 of the tongue when compared with the KBPOAR method. CONCLUSIONS For patients with T3 tumors, no significant difference was found between the KBPOAR and KBPOAR+PTV methods in dosimetric results at most OARs and PTVs. For patients with T4 tumors, the KBPOAR+PTV method performs better than the KBPOAR method in improving the quality of the plans. Compared with the KBPOAR method, dose sparing of some OARs was achieved without reducing PTV dose coverage and helped to increase the number of plans meeting the dose requirements when the KBPOAR+PTV method was utilized.
Collapse
|
10
|
Luca K, Roper J, Wolf J, Kayode O, Bradley J, Stokes WA, Zhang J. Evaluating the plan quality of a general head-and-neck knowledge-based planning model versus separate unilateral/bilateral models. Med Dosim 2022; 48:44-50. [PMID: 36400649 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2022.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Revised: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 10/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
The implementation of knowledge-based planning (KBP) continues to grow in radiotherapy clinics. KBP guides radiation treatment design by generating clinically acceptable plans in a timely and resource-efficient manner. The role of multiple KBP models tailored for variations within a disease site remains undefined in part because of the substantial effort and number of training cases required to create a high-quality KBP model. In this study, our aim was to explore whether site-specific KBP models lead to clinically meaningful differences in plan quality for head-and-neck (HN) patients when compared to a general model. One KBP model was created from prior volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) cases that treated unilateral HN lymph nodes while another model was created from VMAT cases that treated bilateral HN nodes. Thirty cases from each model (60 cases total) were randomly selected to create a third, general model. These models were applied to 60 HN test cases - 30 unilateral and 30 bilateral - to generate 180 VMAT plans in Eclipse. Clinically relevant dose metrics were compared between models. Paired-sample t-tests were used for statistical analysis, with the threshold for statistical significance set a priori at 0.007, taking into consideration multiple hypothesis testing to avoid type I error. For unilateral test cases, the unilateral model-generated plans had significantly lower spinal cord maximum doses (12.1 Gy vs 19.3 Gy, p < 0.001) and oral cavity mean doses (20.8 Gy vs 23.0 Gy, p < 0.001), compared with the bilateral model-generated plans. The unilateral and general models generated comparable plans for unilateral HN test cases. For bilateral test cases, the bilateral model created plans had significantly lower brainstem maximum doses (10.8 Gy vs 12.2 Gy, p < 0.001) and parotid mean doses (24.0 Gy vs 25.5 Gy, p < 0.001) when compared to the unilateral model. Right parotid mean doses were lower for bilateral model plans compared to general model plans (23.8 Gy vs 24.4 Gy). The general model created plans with significantly lower brainstem maximum doses (10.3 Gy vs 10.8 Gy) and oral cavity mean doses (35.3 Gy vs 36.7 Gy) when compared with bilateral model-generated plans. The general model outperformed the bilateral model in several dose metrics but they were not deemed clinically significant. For both case sets, the unilateral and general model created plans had higher monitor units when compared to the bilateral model, likely due to more stringent constraint settings. All other dose metrics were comparable. This study demonstrates that a balanced general HN model created using carefully curated treatment plans can produce high quality plans comparable to dedicated unilateral and bilateral models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirk Luca
- Emory Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| | - Justin Roper
- Emory Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jonathan Wolf
- Emory Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Jiahan Zhang
- Emory Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Li X, Ge Y, Wu Q, Wang C, Sheng Y, Wang W, Stephens H, Yin FF, Wu QJ. Input feature design and its impact on the performance of deep learning models for predicting fluence maps in intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol 2022; 67:215009. [PMID: 36206747 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac9882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Objective. Deep learning (DL) models for fluence map prediction (FMP) have great potential to reduce treatment planning time in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) by avoiding the lengthy inverse optimization process. This study aims to improve the rigor of input feature design in a DL-FMP model by examining how different designs of input features influence model prediction performance.Approach. This study included 231 head-and-neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy patients. Three input feature designs were investigated. The first design (D1) assumed that information of all critical structures from all beam angles should be combined to predict fluence maps. The second design (D2) assumed that local anatomical information was sufficient for predicting radiation intensity of a beamlet at a respective beam angle. The third design (D3) assumed the need for both local anatomical information and inter-beam modulation to predict radiation intensity values of the beamlets that intersect at a voxel. For each input design, we tailored the DL model accordingly. All models were trained using the same set of ground truth plans (GT plans). The plans generated by DL models (DL plans) were analyzed using key dose-volume metrics. One-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons correction (Bonferroni method) was performed (significance level = 0.05).Main results. For PTV-related metrics, all DL plans had significantly higher maximum dose (p < 0.001), conformity index (p < 0.001), and heterogeneity index (p < 0.001) compared to GT plans, with D2 being the worst performer. Meanwhile, except for cord+5 mm (p < 0.001), DL plans of all designs resulted in OAR dose metrics that are comparable to those of GT plans.Significance. Local anatomical information contains most of the information that DL models need to predict fluence maps for clinically acceptable OAR sparing. Input features from beam angles are needed to achieve the best PTV coverage. These results provide valuable insights for further improvement of DL-FMP models and DL models in general.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinyi Li
- Duke University Medical Center, United States of America
| | - Yaorong Ge
- University of North Carolina at Charlotte, United States of America
| | - Qiuwen Wu
- Duke University Medical Center, United States of America
| | - Chunhao Wang
- Duke University Medical Center, United States of America
| | - Yang Sheng
- Duke University Medical Center, United States of America
| | - Wentao Wang
- Duke University Medical Center, United States of America
| | | | - Fang-Fang Yin
- Duke University Medical Center, United States of America
| | - Q Jackie Wu
- Duke University Medical Center, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
Treatment planning in radiation therapy has progressed enormously over the past several decades. Such advancements came in the form of innovative hardware and algorithms, giving rise to modalities such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volume modulated arc therapy, greatly improving patient outcome and quality of life. While these developments have improved the overall plan quality, they have also given rise to higher treatment planning complexity. This has resulted in increased treatment planning time and higher variability in the final approved plan quality. Radiation oncology, as an already technologically advanced field, has much research and implementation involving the use of AI. The field has begun to show the efficacy of using such technologies in many of its sub-areas, such as in diagnosis, imaging, segmentation, treatment planning, quality assurance, treatment delivery, and follow-up. Some AI technologies have already been clinically implemented by commercial systems. In this article, we will provide an overview to methods involved with treatment planning in radiation therapy. In particular, we will review the recent research and literature related to automation of the treatment planning process, leading to potentially higher efficiency and higher quality plans. We will then present the current and future challenges, as well as some future perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan Nguyen
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
| | - Mu-Han Lin
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - David Sher
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Weiguo Lu
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Xun Jia
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Steve Jiang
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tao C, Liu B, Li C, Zhu J, Yin Y, Lu J. A novel knowledge-based prediction model for estimating an initial equivalent uniform dose in semi-auto-planning for cervical cancer. Radiat Oncol 2022; 17:151. [PMID: 36038941 PMCID: PMC9426003 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-02120-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We developed a novel concept, equivalent uniform length (EUL), to describe the relationship between the generalized equivalent uniform dose (EUD) and the geometric anatomy around a tumor target. By correlating EUL with EUD, we established two EUD–EUL knowledge-based (EEKB) prediction models for the bladder and rectum that predict initial EUD values for generating quality treatment plans. Methods EUL metrics for the rectum and bladder were extracted and collected from the intensity-modulated radiotherapy therapy (IMRT) plans of 60 patients with cervical cancer. The two EEKB prediction models were built using linear regression to establish the relationships between EULr and EUDr (EUL and EUD of rectum) and EULb, and EUDb (EUL and EUD of bladder), respectively. The EE plans were optimized by incorporating the predicted initial EUD parameters for the rectum and bladder with the conventional pinnacle auto-planning (PAP) initial dose parameters for other organs. The efficiency of the predicted initial EUD values were then evaluated by comparing the consistency and quality of the EE plans, PAP plans (based on default PAP initial parameters), and manual plans (designed manually by different dosimetrists) for a sample of 20 patients. Results Linear regression analyses showed a significant correlation between EUL and EUD (R2 = 0.79 and 0.69 for EUDb and EUDr, respectively). In a sample of 20 patients, the average bladder V40 and V50 derived from the EE plans were significantly lower (V40: 30.00 ± 5.76, V50: 14.36 ± 4.00) than the V40 and V50 values derived from manual plans (V40: 36.03 ± 8.02, V50: 19.02 ± 5.42). Compared with the PAP plans, the EE plans produced significantly lower average V30 and Dmean values for the bladder (V30: 50.55 ± 6.33, Dmean: 31.48 ± 1.97 Gy). Conclusions Our EEKB prediction models predicted reasonable initial EUD values for the rectum and bladder based on patient-specific geometric EUL values, thereby improving optimization and planning efficiency. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-022-02120-4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng Tao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 440, Jiyan Road, Jinan, 250117, China
| | - Bo Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 440, Jiyan Road, Jinan, 250117, China
| | - Chengqiang Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 440, Jiyan Road, Jinan, 250117, China
| | - Jian Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 440, Jiyan Road, Jinan, 250117, China.
| | - Yong Yin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 440, Jiyan Road, Jinan, 250117, China.
| | - Jie Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 440, Jiyan Road, Jinan, 250117, China.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Fiorini P, Goldberg KY, Liu Y, Taylor RH. Concepts and Trends n Autonomy for Robot-Assisted Surgery. PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE. INSTITUTE OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS 2022; 110:993-1011. [PMID: 35911127 PMCID: PMC7613181 DOI: 10.1109/jproc.2022.3176828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
Surgical robots have been widely adopted with over 4000 robots being used in practice daily. However, these are telerobots that are fully controlled by skilled human surgeons. Introducing "surgeon-assist"-some forms of autonomy-has the potential to reduce tedium and increase consistency, analogous to driver-assist functions for lanekeeping, cruise control, and parking. This article examines the scientific and technical backgrounds of robotic autonomy in surgery and some ethical, social, and legal implications. We describe several autonomous surgical tasks that have been automated in laboratory settings, and research concepts and trends.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Fiorini
- Department of Computer Science, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy
| | - Ken Y. Goldberg
- Department of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research and the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
| | - Yunhui Liu
- Department of Mechanical and Automation Engineering, T Stone Robotics Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Russell H. Taylor
- Department of Computer Science, the Department of Mechanical Engineering, the Department of Radiology, the Department of Surgery, and the Department of Otolaryngology, Head-and-Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA, and also with the Laboratory for Computational Sensing and Robotics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Zhang D, Yuan Z, Hu P, Yang Y. Automatic treatment planning for cervical cancer radiation therapy using direct three-dimensional patient anatomy match. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13649. [PMID: 35635799 PMCID: PMC9359047 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Revised: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Current knowledge‐based planning methods for radiation therapy mainly use low‐dimensional features extracted from contoured structures to identify geometrically similar patients. Here, we propose a knowledge‐based treatment planning method where the anatomical similarity is quantified by the rigid registration of the three‐dimensional (3D) planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risks (OARs) between an incoming patient and database patients. Methods A database that contains PTV and OARs contours from 81 cervical cancer radiation therapy patients was established. To identify the anatomically similar patients, the PTV of the new patient was registered to each PTV in the database and the Dice similarity coefficients were calculated for the PTV, rectum, and bladder between the new patient and database patients. Then the top 20 patients in the PTV match and top 3 patients in the subsequent bladder or rectum match were selected. The best dose–volume histogram parameters from the top three patients were applied as the dose constraints to the automatic plan optimization. A fast Fourier transform algorithm was developed to accelerate the 3D PTV registration process run through the database. The entire treatment planning process was automated using in‐house customized Pinnacle scripts. The automatic plans were generated for 20 patients using leave‐one‐out scheme and were evaluated against the corresponding clinical plans. Results The automatic plans significantly reduced rectum and bladder V50Gy by 11.79% ± 5.2% (p < 0.01) and 2.85% ± 3.16% (p < 0.01), respectively. The dose parameters achieved for the PTV and other OARs were comparable to those in the clinical plans. The entire planning process, including both dose prediction and inverse optimization, costs about 6 min. Conclusions The direct 3D contour match method utilizes the full spatial information of the PTV and OARs of interest and provides an intuitive measurement for patient plan anatomy similarity. The proposed automatic planning method can generate plans with better quality and higher efficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Duoer Zhang
- Department of Engineering and Applied Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Zengtai Yuan
- Department of Engineering and Applied Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Panpan Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Yidong Yang
- Department of Engineering and Applied Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hooshangnejad H, Han-Oh S, Shin EJ, Narang A, Rao AD, Lee J, McNutt T, Hu C, Wong J, Ding K. Demonstrating the benefits of corrective intraoperative feedback in improving the quality of duodenal hydrogel spacer placement. Med Phys 2022; 49:4794-4803. [PMID: 35394064 PMCID: PMC9540875 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2021] [Revised: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 04/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer‐related death with a 10% 5‐year overall survival rate (OS). Radiation therapy (RT) in addition to dose escalation improves the outcome by significantly increasing the OS at 2 and 3 years but is hindered by the toxicity of the duodenum. Our group showed that the insertion of hydrogel spacer reduces duodenal toxicity, but the complex anatomy and the demanding procedure make the benefits highly uncertain. Here, we investigated the feasibility of augmenting the workflow with intraoperative feedback to reduce the adverse effects of the uncertainties. Materials and Methods We simulated three scenarios of the virtual spacer for four cadavers with two types of gross tumor volume (GTV) (small and large); first, the ideal injection; second, the nonideal injection that incorporates common spacer placement uncertainties; and third, the corrective injection that uses the simulation result from nonideal injection and is designed to compensate for the effect of uncertainties. We considered two common uncertainties: (1) “Narrowing” is defined as the injection of smaller spacer volume than planned. (2) “Missing part” is defined as failure to inject spacer in the ascending section of the duodenum. A total of 32 stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) plans (33 Gy in 5 fractions) were designed, for four cadavers, two GTV sizes, and two types of uncertainties. The preinjection scenario for each case was compared with three scenarios of virtual spacer placement from the dosimetric and geometric points of view. Results We found that the overlapping PTV space with the duodenum is an informative quantity for determining the effective location of the spacer. The ideal spacer distribution reduced the duodenal V33Gy for small and large GTV to less than 0.3 and 0.1cc, from an average of 3.3cc, and 1.2cc for the preinjection scenario. However, spacer placement uncertainties reduced the efficacy of the spacer in sparing the duodenum (duodenal V33Gy: 1.3 and 0.4cc). The separation between duodenum and GTV decreased by an average of 5.3 and 4.6 mm. The corrective feedback can effectively bring back the expected benefits from the ideal location of the spacer (averaged V33Gy of 0.4 and 0.1cc). Conclusions An informative feedback metric was introduced and used to mitigate the effect of spacer placement uncertainties and maximize the benefits of the EUS‐guided procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamed Hooshangnejad
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Carnegie Center for Surgical Innovation, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Sarah Han-Oh
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Eun Ji Shin
- Department of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Amol Narang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Avani Dholakia Rao
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Junghoon Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Carnegie Center for Surgical Innovation, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Todd McNutt
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Chen Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - John Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Kai Ding
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Carnegie Center for Surgical Innovation, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hooshangnejad H, Youssefian S, Narang A, Shin EJ, Rao AD, Han-Oh S, McNutt T, Lee J, Hu C, Wong J, Ding K. Finite Element-Based Personalized Simulation of Duodenal Hydrogel Spacer: Spacer Location Dependent Duodenal Sparing and a Decision Support System for Spacer-Enabled Pancreatic Cancer Radiation Therapy. Front Oncol 2022; 12:833231. [PMID: 35402281 PMCID: PMC8987290 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.833231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2021] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death, with a very low 5-year overall survival rate (OS). Radiation therapy (RT) together with dose escalation significantly increases the OS at 2 and 3 years. However, dose escalation is very limited due to the proximity of the duodenum. Hydrogel spacers are an effective way to reduce duodenal toxicity, but the complexity of the anatomy and the procedure makes the success and effectiveness of the spacer procedure highly uncertain. To provide a preoperative simulation of hydrogel spacers, we presented a patient-specific spacer simulator algorithm and used it to create a decision support system (DSS) to provide a preoperative optimal spacer location to maximize the spacer benefits. Materials and Methods Our study was divided into three phases. In the validation phase, we evaluated the patient-specific spacer simulator algorithm (FEMOSSA) for the duodenal spacer using the dice similarity coefficient (DSC), overlap volume histogram (OVH), and radial nearest neighbor distance (RNND). For the simulation phase, we simulated four virtual spacer scenarios based on the location of the spacer in para-duodenal space. Next, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) plans were designed and dosimetrically analyzed. Finally, in the prediction phase, using the result of the simulation phase, we created a Bayesian DSS to predict the optimal spacer location and biological effective dose (BED). Results A realistic simulation of the spacer was achieved, reflected in a statistically significant increase in average target and duodenal DSC for the simulated spacer. Moreover, the small difference in average mean and 5th-percentile RNNDs (0.5 and 2.1 mm) and OVH thresholds (average of less than 0.75 mm) showed that the simulation attained similar separation as the real spacer. We found a spacer-location-independent decrease in duodenal V20Gy, a highly spacer-location-dependent change in V33Gy, and a strong correlation between L1cc and V33Gy. Finally, the Bayesian DSS predicted the change in BED with a root mean squared error of 3.6 Gys. Conclusions A duodenal spacer simulator platform was developed and used to systematically study the dosimetric effect of spacer location. Further, L1cc is an informative anatomical feedback to guide the DSS to indicate the spacer efficacy, optimum location, and expected improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamed Hooshangnejad
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Sina Youssefian
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Amol Narang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Eun Ji Shin
- Department of Gastroenterology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Avani Dholakia Rao
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Sarah Han-Oh
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Todd McNutt
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Junghoon Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Chen Hu
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - John Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Kai Ding
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
- *Correspondence: Kai Ding,
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Eriksson O, Zhang T. Robust automated radiation therapy treatment planning using scenario-specific dose prediction and robust dose mimicking. Med Phys 2022; 49:3564-3573. [PMID: 35305023 PMCID: PMC9310773 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Revised: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose We present a framework for robust automated treatment planning using machine learning, comprising scenario‐specific dose prediction and robust dose mimicking. Methods
The scenario dose prediction pipeline is divided into the prediction of nominal dose from input image and the prediction of scenario dose from nominal dose, each using a deep learning model with U‐net architecture. By using a specially developed dose–volume histogram–based loss function, the predicted scenario doses are ensured sufficient target coverage despite the possibility of the training data being non‐robust. Deliverable plans may then be created by solving a robust dose mimicking problem with the predictions as scenario‐specific reference doses. Results Numerical experiments are performed using a data set of 52 intensity‐modulated proton therapy plans for prostate patients. We show that the predicted scenario doses resemble their respective ground truth well, in particular while having target coverage comparable to that of the nominal scenario. The deliverable plans produced by the subsequent robust dose mimicking were showed to be robust against the same scenario set considered for prediction. Conclusions We demonstrate the feasibility and merits of the proposed methodology for incorporating robustness into automated treatment planning algorithms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oskar Eriksson
- RaySearch Laboratories, Eugeniavägen 18, Solna, Stockholm, SE-171 64, Sweden
| | - Tianfang Zhang
- Department of Mathematics, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, SE-100 44, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Data-Driven Dose-Volume Histogram Prediction. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 7:100841. [PMID: 35079664 PMCID: PMC8777147 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2021] [Revised: 10/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate dose-volume histogram (DVH) prediction from prior radiation therapy data. Methods and Materials An Oncospace radiation therapy database was constructed including images, structures, and dose distributions for patients with advanced lung cancer. DVH data was queried for total lungs, esophagus, heart, and external body contours. Each query returned DVH data for the N-most similar organs at risk (OARs) based on OAR-to-planning-target-volume (PTV) geometry via the overlap volume histogram (OVH). The DVHs for 5, 20, and 50 of the most similar OVHs were returned for each OAR for each patient. The OVH(0cm) is the relative volume of the OAR overlapping with the PTV, and the OVH(2cm) is the relative volume of the OAR 2 cm away from the PTV. The OVH(cm) and DVH(%) queried from the database were separated into interquartile ranges (IQRs), nonoutlier ranges (NORs) (equal to 3 × IQR), and the average database DVH (DVH-DB) computed from the NOR data. The ability to predict the clinically delivered DVH was evaluated based on percentiles and differences between the DVH-DB and the clinical DVH (DVH-CL) for a varying number of returned patient DVHs for a subset of patients. Results The ability to predict the clinically delivered DVH was excellent in the lungs and body; the IQR and NOR were <4% and <16%, respectively, in the lungs and <1% and <5%, respectively, in the body at all distances less than 2 cm from the PTV. For 21/23 patients considered, the differences in lung DVH-DB and DVH-CL were <4.6% and in 14/23 cases, <3%. In esophagus and heart, the ability to predict DVH-CL was weaker, with mean DVH differences >10% for 12/23 esophagi and 10/23 hearts. In esophagus and heart queries, the NOR was often 10% to 100% volume in dose ranges between 0% and 50% of prescription, independent of the number of patients queried. Conclusions Using prior data to predict clinical dosimetry is increasingly of interest, but model- and data-driven methods have limitations if based on limited data sets. This study's results showed that prediction may be reasonable in organs containing tumors with known overlap, but for nonoverlapped OARs, planning preference and plan design may dominate the clinical dose.
Collapse
|
20
|
Maass K, Aravkin A, Kim M. A hyperparameter-tuning approach to automated inverse planning. Med Phys 2022; 49:3405-3415. [PMID: 35218033 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2021] [Revised: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In current practice, radiotherapy inverse planning often requires treatment planners to modify multiple parameters in the treatment planning system's objective function to produce clinically acceptable plans. Due to the manual steps in this process, plan quality can vary depending on the planning time available and the planner's skills. PURPOSE This study investigates the feasibility of two hyperparameter-tuning methods for automated inverse planning. Because this framework does not train a model on previously-optimized plans, it can be readily adapted to practice pattern changes, and the resulting plan quality is not limited by that of a training cohort. METHODS We retrospectively selected 10 patients who received lung stereotactic body radiation therapy using manually-generated clinical plans. We implemented random sampling and Bayesian optimization to automatically tune objective function parameters using linear-quadratic utility functions based on 11 clinical goals. Normalizing all plans to deliver a minimum dose of 48 Gy to 95% of the planning target volume, we compared plan quality for the automatically-generated plans to the manually-generated plans. We also investigated the impact of iteration count on the automatically-generated plans, comparing planning time and plan utility for randomized and Bayesian plans with and without stopping criteria. RESULTS Without stopping criteria, the median planning time was 1.9 and 2.3 hours for randomized and Bayesian plans, respectively. The organ-at-risk doses in the randomized and Bayesian plans had a median percent difference (MPD) of 48.7% and 60.4% below clinical dose limits and an MPD of 2.8% and 3.3% below clinical plan doses. With stopping criteria, the utility decreased by an MPD of 5.3% and 3.9% for randomized and Bayesian plans, but the median planning time was reduced to 0.5 and 0.7 hours, and the organ-at-risk doses still had an MPD of 42.9% and 49.7% below clinical dose limits and an MPD of 0.3% and 1.8% below clinical plan doses. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates that hyperparameter-tuning approaches to automated inverse planning can reduce the treatment planner's active planning time with plan quality that is similar to or better than manually-generated plans. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Maass
- University of Washington, Seattle WA
| | - A Aravkin
- University of Washington, Seattle WA
| | - M Kim
- University of Washington, Seattle WA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Yuan Z, Wang Y, Hu P, Zhang D, Yan B, Lu H, Zhang H, Yang Y. Accelerate treatment planning process using deep learning generated fluence maps for cervical cancer radiation therapy. Med Phys 2022; 49:2631-2641. [PMID: 35157337 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2021] [Revised: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Zengtai Yuan
- Department of Engineering and Applied Physics University of Science and Technology of China Hefei Anhui 230026 China
| | - Yuxiang Wang
- Hefei Ion Medical Center the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC Division of Life Sciences and Medicine University of Science and Technology of China Hefei Anhui 231283 China
| | - Panpan Hu
- Department of Engineering and Applied Physics University of Science and Technology of China Hefei Anhui 230026 China
- Department of Radiation Oncology the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC Division of Life Sciences and Medicine University of Science and Technology of China Hefei Anhui 230026 China
| | - Duoer Zhang
- Department of Engineering and Applied Physics University of Science and Technology of China Hefei Anhui 230026 China
| | - Bing Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC Division of Life Sciences and Medicine University of Science and Technology of China Hefei Anhui 230026 China
| | - Hsiao‐Ming Lu
- Hefei Ion Medical Center the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC Division of Life Sciences and Medicine University of Science and Technology of China Hefei Anhui 231283 China
| | - Hongyan Zhang
- Hefei Ion Medical Center the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC Division of Life Sciences and Medicine University of Science and Technology of China Hefei Anhui 231283 China
- Department of Radiation Oncology the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC Division of Life Sciences and Medicine University of Science and Technology of China Hefei Anhui 230026 China
| | - Yidong Yang
- Department of Engineering and Applied Physics University of Science and Technology of China Hefei Anhui 230026 China
- Department of Radiation Oncology the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC Division of Life Sciences and Medicine University of Science and Technology of China Hefei Anhui 230026 China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Adabi S, Tsen TC, Yuan Y. Predicting 3D dose distribution with scale attention network for prostate cancer radiotherapy. PROCEEDINGS OF SPIE--THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR OPTICAL ENGINEERING 2022; 12034:1203417. [PMID: 36147747 PMCID: PMC9491520 DOI: 10.1117/12.2611769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
The growing demand for radiation therapy to treat cancer has been directed to focus on improving treatment planning flow for patients. Accurate dose prediction, therefore, plays a prominent role in this regard. In this study, we propose a framework based on our newly developed scale attention networks (SA-Net) to attain voxel-wise dose prediction. Our network 's dynamic scale attention model incorporates low-level details with high-level semantics from feature maps at different scales. To achieve more accurate results, we used distance data between each local voxel and the organ surfaces instead of binary masks of organs at risk as well as CT image as input of the network. The proposed method is tested on prostate cancer treated with Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT), where the model was training with 120 cases and tested on 20 cases. The average dose difference between the predicted dose and the clinical planned dose was 0.94 Gy, which is equivalent to 2.1% as compared to the prescription dose of 45 Gy. We also compared the performance of SA-Net dose prediction framework with different input format, the signed distance map vs. binary mask and showed the signed distance map was a better format as input to the model training. These findings show that our deep learning-based strategy of dose prediction is effectively feasible for automating the treatment planning in prostate cancer radiography.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saba Adabi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NY, NYC, USA, 10029
| | - Tzu-Chi Tsen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NY, NYC, USA, 10029
| | - Yading Yuan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NY, NYC, USA, 10029
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hito M, Wang W, Stephens H, Xie Y, Li R, Yin FF, Ge Y, Wu QJ, Wu Q, Sheng Y. Assessing the robustness of artificial intelligence powered planning tools in radiotherapy clinical settings-a phantom simulation approach. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2021; 11:4835-4846. [PMID: 34888193 DOI: 10.21037/qims-21-51] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Background Artificial intelligence (AI) based radiotherapy treatment planning tools have gained interest in automating the treatment planning process. It is essential to understand their overall robustness in various clinical scenarios. This is an existing gap between many AI based tools and their actual clinical deployment. This study works to fill the gap for AI based treatment planning by investigating a clinical robustness assessment (CRA) tool for the AI based planning methods using a phantom simulation approach. Methods A cylindrical phantom was created in the treatment planning system (TPS) with the axial dimension of 30 cm by 18 cm. Key structures involved in pancreas stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) including PTV25, PTV33, C-Loop, stomach, bowel and liver were created within the phantom. Several simulation scenarios were created to mimic multiple scenarios of anatomical changes, including displacement, expansion, rotation and combination of three. The goal of treatment planning was to deliver 25 Gy to PTV25 and 33 Gy to PTV33 in 5 fractions in simultaneous integral boost (SIB) manner while limiting luminal organ-at-risk (OAR) max dose to be under 29 Gy. A previously developed deep learning based AI treatment planning tool for pancreas SBRT was identified as the validation object. For each scenario, the anatomy information was fed into the AI tool and the final fluence map associated to the plan was generated, which was subsequently sent to TPS for leaf sequencing and dose calculation. The final auto plan's quality was analyzed against the treatment planning constraint. The final plans' quality was further analyzed to evaluate potential correlation with anatomical changes using the Manhattan plot. Results A total of 32 scenarios were simulated in this study. For all scenarios, the mean PTV25 V25Gy of the AI based auto plans was 96.7% while mean PTV33 V33Gy was 82.2%. Large variation (16.3%) in PTV33 V33Gy was observed due to anatomical variations, a.k.a. proximity of luminal structure to PTV33. Mean max dose was 28.55, 27.68 and 24.63 Gy for C-Loop, bowel and stomach, respectively. Using D0.03cc as max dose surrogate, the value was 28.03, 27.12 and 23.84 Gy for C-Loop, bowel and stomach, respectively. Max dose constraint of 29 Gy was achieved for 81.3% cases for C-Loop and stomach, and 78.1% for bowel. Using D0.03cc as max dose surrogate, the passing rate was 90.6% for C-Loop, and 81.3% for bowel and stomach. Manhattan plot revealed high correlation between the OAR over dose and the minimal distance between the PTV33 and OAR. Conclusions The results showed promising robustness of the pancreas SBRT AI tool, providing important evidence of its readiness for clinical implementation. The established workflow could guide the process of assuring clinical readiness of future AI based treatment planning tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Hito
- Department of Computer Science, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Wentao Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Hunter Stephens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Yibo Xie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Ruilin Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Fang-Fang Yin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Yaorong Ge
- Department of Software and Information Systems, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Q Jackie Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Qiuwen Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Yang Sheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Sheng Y, Zhang J, Ge Y, Li X, Wang W, Stephens H, Yin FF, Wu Q, Wu QJ. Artificial intelligence applications in intensity modulated radiation treatment planning: an overview. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2021; 11:4859-4880. [PMID: 34888195 PMCID: PMC8611458 DOI: 10.21037/qims-21-208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2021] [Accepted: 07/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) refers to methods that improve and automate challenging human tasks by systematically capturing and applying relevant knowledge in these tasks. Over the past decades, a number of approaches have been developed to address different types and needs of system intelligence ranging from search strategies to knowledge representation and inference to robotic planning. In the context of radiation treatment planning, multiple AI approaches may be adopted to improve the planning quality and efficiency. For example, knowledge representation and inference methods may improve dose prescription by integrating and reasoning about the domain knowledge described in many clinical guidelines and clinical trials reports. In this review, we will focus on the most studied AI approach in intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)/volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT)-machine learning (ML) and describe our recent efforts in applying ML to improve the quality, consistency, and efficiency of IMRT/VMAT planning. With the available high-quality data, we can build models to accurately predict critical variables for each step of the planning process and thus automate and improve its outcomes. Specific to the IMRT/VMAT planning process, we can build models for each of the four critical components in the process: dose-volume histogram (DVH), Dose, Fluence, and Human Planner. These models can be divided into two general groups. The first group focuses on encoding prior experience and knowledge through ML and more recently deep learning (DL) from prior clinical plans and using these models to predict the optimal DVH (DVH prediction model), or 3D dose distribution (dose prediction model), or fluence map (fluence map model). The goal of these models is to reduce or remove the trial-and-error process and guarantee consistently high-quality plans. The second group of models focuses on mimicking human planners' decision-making process (planning strategy model) during the iterative adjustments/guidance of the optimization engine. Each critical step of the IMRT/VMAT treatment planning process can be improved and automated by AI methods. As more training data becomes available and more sophisticated models are developed, we can expect that the AI methods in treatment planning will continue to improve accuracy, efficiency, and robustness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Sheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jiahan Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Yaorong Ge
- Department of Software and Information Systems, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Xinyi Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Wentao Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Hunter Stephens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Fang-Fang Yin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Qiuwen Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Q. Jackie Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Momin S, Fu Y, Lei Y, Roper J, Bradley JD, Curran WJ, Liu T, Yang X. Knowledge-based radiation treatment planning: A data-driven method survey. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2021; 22:16-44. [PMID: 34231970 PMCID: PMC8364264 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Revised: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
This paper surveys the data-driven dose prediction methods investigated for knowledge-based planning (KBP) in the last decade. These methods were classified into two major categories-traditional KBP methods and deep-learning (DL) methods-according to their techniques of utilizing previous knowledge. Traditional KBP methods include studies that require geometric or anatomical features to either find the best-matched case(s) from a repository of prior treatment plans or to build dose prediction models. DL methods include studies that train neural networks to make dose predictions. A comprehensive review of each category is presented, highlighting key features, methods, and their advancements over the years. We separated the cited works according to the framework and cancer site in each category. Finally, we briefly discuss the performance of both traditional KBP methods and DL methods, then discuss future trends of both data-driven KBP methods to dose prediction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shadab Momin
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer InstituteEmory UniversityAtlantaGAUSA
| | - Yabo Fu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer InstituteEmory UniversityAtlantaGAUSA
| | - Yang Lei
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer InstituteEmory UniversityAtlantaGAUSA
| | - Justin Roper
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer InstituteEmory UniversityAtlantaGAUSA
| | - Jeffrey D. Bradley
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer InstituteEmory UniversityAtlantaGAUSA
| | - Walter J. Curran
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer InstituteEmory UniversityAtlantaGAUSA
| | - Tian Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer InstituteEmory UniversityAtlantaGAUSA
| | - Xiaofeng Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer InstituteEmory UniversityAtlantaGAUSA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Peng J, Chen Y, Zhao J, Wang J, Xia X, Cai B, Mazur TR, Zhu J, Zhang Z, Hu W. An atlas-guided automatic planning approach for rectal cancer intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66. [PMID: 34237715 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac127d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
We try to develop an atlas-guided automatic planning (AGAP) approach and evaluate its feasibility and performance in rectal cancer intensity-modulated radiotherapy. The developed AGAP approach consisted of four independent modules: patient atlas, similar patient retrieval, beam morphing (BM), and plan fine-tuning (PFT) modules. The atlas was setup using anatomy and plan data from Pinnacle auto-planning (P-auto) plans. Given a new patient, the retrieval function searched the top similar patient by a generic Fourier descriptor algorithm and retrieved its plan information. The BM function generated an initial plan for the new patient by morphing the beam aperture from the top similar patient plan. The beam aperture and calculated dose of the initial plan were used to guide the new plan optimization in the PFT function. The AGAP approach was tested on 96 patients by the leave-one-out validation and plan quality was compared with the P-auto plans. The AGAP and P-auto plans had no statistical difference for target coverage and dose homogeneity in terms ofV100%(p = 0.76) and homogeneity index (p = 0.073), respectively. The CI index showed they had a statistically significant difference. But the ΔCI was both 0.02 compared to the perfect CI index of 1. The AGAP approach reduced the bladder mean dose by 152.1 cGy (p < 0.05) andV50by 0.9% (p < 0.05), and slightly increased the left and right femoral head mean dose by 70.1 cGy (p < 0.05) and 69.7 cGy (p < 0.05), respectively. This work developed an efficient and automatic approach that could fully automate the IMRT planning process in rectal cancer radiotherapy. It reduced the plan quality dependence on the planner experience and maintained the comparable plan quality with P-auto plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiayuan Peng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Yuanhua Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China
| | - Jun Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Jiazhou Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiang Xia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Bin Cai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas, Texas 75390, United States of America
| | - Thomas R Mazur
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63110 United States of America
| | - Ji Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhen Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| | - Weigang Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Zhang T, Bokrantz R, Olsson J. Probabilistic feature extraction, dose statistic prediction and dose mimicking for automated radiation therapy treatment planning. Med Phys 2021; 48:4730-4742. [PMID: 34265105 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Revised: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We propose a general framework for quantifying predictive uncertainties of dose-related quantities and leveraging this information in a dose mimicking problem in the context of automated radiation therapy treatment planning. METHODS A three-step pipeline, comprising feature extraction, dose statistic prediction and dose mimicking, is employed. In particular, the features are produced by a convolutional variational autoencoder and used as inputs in a previously developed nonparametric Bayesian statistical method, estimating the multivariate predictive distribution of a collection of predefined dose statistics. Specially developed objective functions are then used to construct a probabilistic dose mimicking problem based on the produced distributions, creating deliverable treatment plans. RESULTS The numerical experiments are performed using a dataset of 94 retrospective treatment plans of prostate cancer patients. We show that the features extracted by the variational autoencoder capture geometric information of substantial relevance to the dose statistic prediction problem and are related to dose statistics in a more regularized fashion than hand-crafted features. The estimated predictive distributions are reasonable and outperforms a non-input-dependent benchmark method, and the deliverable plans produced by the probabilistic dose mimicking agree better with their clinical counterparts than for a non-probabilistic formulation. CONCLUSIONS We demonstrate that prediction of dose-related quantities may be extended to include uncertainty estimation and that such probabilistic information may be leveraged in a dose mimicking problem. The treatment plans produced by the proposed pipeline resemble their original counterparts well, illustrating the merits of a holistic approach to automated planning based on probabilistic modeling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tianfang Zhang
- Department of Mathematics, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.,RaySearch Laboratories, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Rasmus Bokrantz
- Department of Mathematics, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jimmy Olsson
- Department of Mathematics, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Zhong Y, Yu L, Zhao J, Fang Y, Yang Y, Wu Z, Wang J, Hu W. Clinical Implementation of Automated Treatment Planning for Rectum Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Using Voxel-Based Dose Prediction and Post-Optimization Strategies. Front Oncol 2021; 11:697995. [PMID: 34249757 PMCID: PMC8264432 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.697995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2021] [Accepted: 06/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study aims to demonstrate the feasibility of clinical implementation of automated treatment planning (ATP) using voxel-based dose prediction and post-optimization strategies for rectal cancer on uRT (United Imaging Healthcare, Shanghai, China) treatment planning system. Methods A total of 180 previously treated rectal cancer cases were enrolled in this study, including 160 cases for training, 10 for validation and 10 for testing. Using CT image data, planning target volumes (PTVs) and contour delineation of the organs at risk (OARs) as input and three-dimensional (3D) dose distribution as output, a 3D-Uet DL model was developed. Based on the voxel-wise prediction dose distribution, intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans were then generated automatedly using post-optimization strategies, including a complex clinical dose target metrics homogeneity index (HI) and conformation index (CI). To evaluate the performance of the proposed ATP approach, the dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters of OARs and PTV and the 3D dose distributions of the plan were compared with those of manual plans. Results By combining clinical post-optimization strategies, the automatically generated treatment plan can achieve better homogeneous PTV coverage and dose sparing for OARs except the mean dose for femoral-head compared with the use of the mean square error objective function alone. Compared with the manual plan, no statistically significant differences in HI, CI or global maximum dose were found. The manual plans perform slightly better than plans with post-optimization strategies in other dosimetric indexes, but these plans are still within clinical requirements. Conclusions With the help of clinical post-optimization strategies, the proposed new ATP solution can generate IMRT plans that are within clinically acceptable levels and comparable to plans manually generated by dosimetrists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Zhong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Lei Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Jun Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Yingtao Fang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Yanju Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhiqiang Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiazhou Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| | - Weigang Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Field M, Hardcastle N, Jameson M, Aherne N, Holloway L. Machine learning applications in radiation oncology. PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY 2021; 19:13-24. [PMID: 34307915 PMCID: PMC8295850 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2021.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2020] [Revised: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Machine learning technology has a growing impact on radiation oncology with an increasing presence in research and industry. The prevalence of diverse data including 3D imaging and the 3D radiation dose delivery presents potential for future automation and scope for treatment improvements for cancer patients. Harnessing this potential requires standardization of tools and data, and focused collaboration between fields of expertise. The rapid advancement of radiation oncology treatment technologies presents opportunities for machine learning integration with investments targeted towards data quality, data extraction, software, and engagement with clinical expertise. In this review, we provide an overview of machine learning concepts before reviewing advances in applying machine learning to radiation oncology and integrating these techniques into the radiation oncology workflows. Several key areas are outlined in the radiation oncology workflow where machine learning has been applied and where it can have a significant impact in terms of efficiency, consistency in treatment and overall treatment outcomes. This review highlights that machine learning has key early applications in radiation oncology due to the repetitive nature of many tasks that also currently have human review. Standardized data management of routinely collected imaging and radiation dose data are also highlighted as enabling engagement in research utilizing machine learning and the ability integrate these technologies into clinical workflow to benefit patients. Physicists need to be part of the conversation to facilitate this technical integration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Field
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Nicholas Hardcastle
- Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Michael Jameson
- GenesisCare, Alexandria, NSW, Australia.,St Vincent's Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Australia
| | - Noel Aherne
- Mid North Coast Cancer Institute, NSW, Australia.,Rural Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Lois Holloway
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Momin S, Lei Y, Wang T, Zhang J, Roper J, Bradley JD, Curran WJ, Patel P, Liu T, Yang X. Learning-based dose prediction for pancreatic stereotactic body radiation therapy using dual pyramid adversarial network. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66:125019. [PMID: 34087807 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac0856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2020] [Accepted: 06/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Treatment planning for pancreatic cancer stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is very challenging owing to vast spatial variations and close proximity of many organs-at-risk. Recently, deep learning (DL) based methods have been applied in dose prediction tasks of various treatment sites with the aim of relieving planning challenges. However, its effectiveness on pancreatic cancer SBRT is yet to be fully explored due to limited investigations in the literature. This study aims to further current knowledge in DL-based dose prediction tasks by implementing and demonstrating the feasibility of a new dual pyramid networks (DPNs) integrated DL model for predicting dose distributions of pancreatic SBRT. The proposed framework is composed of four parts: CT-only feature pyramid network (FPN), contour-only FPN, late fusion network and an adversarial network. During each phase of the network, combination of mean absolute error, gradient difference error, histogram matching, and adversarial loss is used for supervision. The performance of proposed model was demonstrated for pancreatic cancer SBRT plans with doses prescribed between 33 and 50 Gy across as many as three planning target volumes (PTVs) in five fractions. Five-fold cross validation was performed on 30 patients, and another 20 patients were used as holdout tests of trained model. Predicted plans were compared with clinically approved plans through dose volume parameters and two-paired t-test. For the same sets, our results were compared with three different DL architectures: 3D U-Net, 3D U-Net with adversarial learning, and DPN without adversarial learning. The proposed framework was able to predict 87% and 91% of clinically relevant dose parameters for cross validation sets and holdout sets, respectively, without any significant differences (P > 0.05). Dose distribution predicted by our framework was also able to predict the intentional hotspots as feature characteristics of SBRT plans. Our method achieved higher correlation coefficients with the ground truth in 22/26, 24/26 and 20/26 dose volume parameters compared to the network without adversarial learning, 3D U-Net, and 3D U-Net with adversarial learning, respectively. Overall, the proposed model was able to predict doses to cases with both single and multiple PTVs. In conclusion, the DPN integrated DL model was successfully implemented, and demonstrated good dose prediction accuracy and dosimetric characteristics for pancreatic cancer SBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shadab Momin
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
| | - Yang Lei
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
| | - Tonghe Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
| | - Jiahan Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
| | - Justin Roper
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
| | - Jeffrey D Bradley
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
| | - Walter J Curran
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
| | - Pretesh Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
| | - Tian Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
| | - Xiaofeng Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Hooshangnejad H, Youssefian S, Guest JK, Ding K. FEMOSSA: Patient-specific finite element simulation of the prostate-rectum spacer placement, a predictive model for prostate cancer radiotherapy. Med Phys 2021; 48:3438-3452. [PMID: 34021606 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Revised: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Major advances in delivery systems in recent years have turned radiotherapy (RT) into a more effective way to manage prostate cancer. Still, adjacency of organs at risk (OARs) can severely limit RT benefits. Rectal spacer implant in recto-prostatic space provides sufficient separation between prostate and rectum, and therefore, the opportunity for potential dose escalation to the target and reduction of OAR dose. Pretreatment simulation of spacer placement can potentially provide decision support to reduce the risks and increase the efficacy of the spacer placement procedure. METHODS A novel finite element method-oriented spacer simulation algorithm, FEMOSSA, was developed in this study. We used the finite element (FE) method to model and predict the deformation of rectum and prostate wall, stemming from hydrogel injection. Ten cases of prostate cancer, which undergone hydrogel placement before the RT treatment, were included in this study. We used the pre-injection organ contours to create the FE model and post-injection spacer location to estimate the distribution of the virtual spacer. Material properties and boundary conditions specific to each patient's anatomy were assigned. The FE analysis was then performed to determine the displacement vectors of regions of interest (ROIs), and the results were validated by comparing the virtually simulated contours with the real post-injection contours. To evaluate the different aspects of our method's performance, we used three different figures of merit: dice similarity coefficient (DSC), nearest neighbor distance (NND), and overlapped volume histogram (OVH). Finally, to demonstrate a potential dosimetric application of FEMOSSA, the predicted rectal dose after virtual spacer placement was compared against the predicted post-injection rectal dose. RESULTS Our simulation showed a realistic deformation of ROIs. The post-simulation (virtual spacer) created the same separation between prostate and rectal wall, as post-injection spacer. The average DSCs for prostate and rectum were 0.87 and 0.74, respectively. Moreover, there was a statistically significant increase in rectal contour similarity coefficient (P < 0.01). Histogram of NNDs showed the same overall shape and a noticeable shift from lower to higher values for both post-simulation and post-injection, indicative of the increase in distance between prostate and rectum. There was less than 2.2- and 2.1-mm averaged difference between the mean and fifth percentile NNDs. The difference between the OVH distances and the corresponding predicted rectal dose was, on average, less than 1 mm and 1.5 Gy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS FEMOSSA provides a realistic simulation of the hydrogel injection process that can facilitate spacer placement planning and reduce the associated uncertainties. Consequently, it increases the robustness and success rate of spacer placement procedure that in turn improves prostate cancer RT quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamed Hooshangnejad
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Sina Youssefian
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.,Department of Civil and Systems Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - James K Guest
- Department of Civil and Systems Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Kai Ding
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Costa E, Richir T, Robilliard M, Bragard C, Logerot C, Kirova Y, Fourquet A, De Marzi L. Assessment of a conventional volumetric-modulated arc therapy knowledge-based planning model applied to the new Halcyon© O-ring linac in locoregional breast cancer radiotherapy. Phys Med 2021; 86:32-43. [PMID: 34051551 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.05.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2021] [Revised: 03/31/2021] [Accepted: 05/13/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of a knowledge-based planning (KBP) model for breast cancer trained on plans performed on a conventional linac with 6 MV FF (flattening filter) beams and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for plans performed on the new jawless Halcyon© system with 6 MV FFF (flattening filter-free) beams. MATERIALS AND METHODS Based on the RapidPlan© (RP) KBP optimization engine, a DVH Estimation Model was first trained using 56 VMAT left-sided breast cancer treatment plans performed on a conventional linac, and validated on another 20 similar cases (without manual intervention). To determine the capacity of the model for Halcyon©, an additional cohort of 20 left-sided breast cancer plans was generated with RP and analyzed for both TrueBeam© and Halcyon© machines. Plan qualities between manual vs RP (followed by manual intervention) Halcyon© plans set were compared qualitatively by blinded review by radiation oncologists for 10 new independent plans. RESULTS Halcyon© plans generated with the VMAT model trained with conventional linac plans showed comparable target dose distribution compared to TrueBeam© plans. Organ sparingwas comparable between the 2 devices with a slight decrease in heart dose for Halcyon© plans. Nine out of ten automatically generated Halcyon© plans were preferentially chosen by the radiation oncologists over the manually generated Halcyon© plans. CONCLUSION A VMAT KBP model driven by plans performed on a conventional linac with 6 MV FF beams provides high quality plans performed with 6 MV FFF beams on the new Halcyon© linac.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilie Costa
- Institut Curie, Radiation Oncology Department, 26 rue d'Ulm, Paris 75005, France.
| | - Thomas Richir
- Institut Curie, Radiation Oncology Department, 26 rue d'Ulm, Paris 75005, France
| | - Magalie Robilliard
- Institut Curie, Radiation Oncology Department, 26 rue d'Ulm, Paris 75005, France
| | - Christel Bragard
- Institut Curie, Radiation Oncology Department, 26 rue d'Ulm, Paris 75005, France
| | - Christelle Logerot
- Institut Curie, Radiation Oncology Department, 26 rue d'Ulm, Paris 75005, France
| | - Youlia Kirova
- Institut Curie, Radiation Oncology Department, 26 rue d'Ulm, Paris 75005, France
| | - Alain Fourquet
- Institut Curie, Radiation Oncology Department, 26 rue d'Ulm, Paris 75005, France
| | - Ludovic De Marzi
- Institut Curie, Radiation Oncology Department, 26 rue d'Ulm, Paris 75005, France; Institut Curie, University Paris Saclay, PSL Research University, Inserm LITO, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Shao Y, Zhang X, Wu G, Gu Q, Wang J, Ying Y, Feng A, Xie G, Kong Q, Xu Z. Prediction of Three-Dimensional Radiotherapy Optimal Dose Distributions for Lung Cancer Patients With Asymmetric Network. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 2021; 25:1120-1127. [PMID: 32966222 DOI: 10.1109/jbhi.2020.3025712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
The iterative design of radiotherapy treatment plans is time-consuming and labor-intensive. In order to provide a guidance to treatment planning, Asymmetric network (A-Net) is proposed to predict the optimal 3D dose distribution for lung cancer patients. A-Net was trained and tested in 392 lung cancer cases with the prescription doses of 50Gy and 60Gy. In A-Net, the encoder and decoder are asymmetric, able to preserve input information and to adapt the limitation of GPU memory. Squeeze and excitation (SE) units are used to improve the data-fitting ability. A loss function involving both the dose distribution and prescription dose as ground truth are designed. In the experiment, A-Net is separately trained and tested in the 50Gy and 60Gy dataset and most of the metrics A-Net achieve similar performance as HD-Unet and 3D-Unet, and some metrics slightly better. In the 50Gy-and-60Gy-combined dataset, most of the A-Net's metrics perform better than the other two. In conclusion, A-Net can accurately predict the IMRT dose distribution in the three datasets of 50Gy and 50Gy-and-60Gy-combined dataset.
Collapse
|
34
|
Wang M, Gu H, Hu J, Liang J, Xu S, Qi Z. Evaluation of a highly refined prediction model in knowledge-based volumetric modulated arc therapy planning for cervical cancer. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:58. [PMID: 33752699 PMCID: PMC7983216 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01783-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Accepted: 03/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose To explore whether a highly refined dose volume histograms (DVH) prediction model can improve the accuracy and reliability of knowledge-based volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) planning for cervical cancer. Methods and materials The proposed model underwent repeated refining through progressive training until the training samples increased from initial 25 prior plans up to 100 cases. The estimated DVHs derived from the prediction models of different runs of training were compared in 35 new cervical cancer patients to analyze the effect of such an interactive plan and model evolution method. The reliability and efficiency of knowledge-based planning (KBP) using this highly refined model in improving the consistency and quality of the VMAT plans were also evaluated. Results The prediction ability was reinforced with the increased number of refinements in terms of normal tissue sparing. With enhanced prediction accuracy, more than 60% of automatic plan-6 (AP-6) plans (22/35) can be directly approved for clinical treatment without any manual revision. The plan quality scores for clinically approved plans (CPs) and manual plans (MPs) were on average 89.02 ± 4.83 and 86.48 ± 3.92 (p < 0.001). Knowledge-based planning significantly reduced the Dmean and V18 Gy for kidney (L/R), the Dmean, V30 Gy, and V40 Gy for bladder, rectum, and femoral head (L/R). Conclusion The proposed model evolution method provides a practical way for the KBP to enhance its prediction ability with minimal human intervene. This highly refined prediction model can better guide KBP in improving the consistency and quality of the VMAT plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mingli Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Huikuan Gu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Jiang Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Jian Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Sisi Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhenyu Qi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China. .,State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China. .,Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Deep learning dose prediction for IMRT of esophageal cancer: The effect of data quality and quantity on model performance. Phys Med 2021; 83:52-63. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.02.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2020] [Revised: 02/15/2021] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
|
36
|
Nguyen D, Sadeghnejad Barkousaraie A, Bohara G, Balagopal A, McBeth R, Lin MH, Jiang S. A comparison of Monte Carlo dropout and bootstrap aggregation on the performance and uncertainty estimation in radiation therapy dose prediction with deep learning neural networks. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66:054002. [PMID: 33503599 PMCID: PMC8837265 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abe04f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Recently, artificial intelligence technologies and algorithms have become a major focus for advancements in treatment planning for radiation therapy. As these are starting to become incorporated into the clinical workflow, a major concern from clinicians is not whether the model is accurate, but whether the model can express to a human operator when it does not know if its answer is correct. We propose to use Monte Carlo Dropout (MCDO) and the bootstrap aggregation (bagging) technique on deep learning (DL) models to produce uncertainty estimations for radiation therapy dose prediction. We show that both models are capable of generating a reasonable uncertainty map, and, with our proposed scaling technique, creating interpretable uncertainties and bounds on the prediction and any relevant metrics. Performance-wise, bagging provides statistically significant reduced loss value and errors in most of the metrics investigated in this study. The addition of bagging was able to further reduce errors by another 0.34% for [Formula: see text] and 0.19% for [Formula: see text] on average, when compared to the baseline model. Overall, the bagging framework provided significantly lower mean absolute error (MAE) of 2.62, as opposed to the baseline model's MAE of 2.87. The usefulness of bagging, from solely a performance standpoint, does highly depend on the problem and the acceptable predictive error, and its high upfront computational cost during training should be factored in to deciding whether it is advantageous to use it. In terms of deployment with uncertainty estimations turned on, both methods offer the same performance time of about 12 s. As an ensemble-based metaheuristic, bagging can be used with existing machine learning architectures to improve stability and performance, and MCDO can be applied to any DL models that have dropout as part of their architecture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan Nguyen
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, United States of America
| | - Azar Sadeghnejad Barkousaraie
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, United States of America
| | - Gyanendra Bohara
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, United States of America
| | - Anjali Balagopal
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, United States of America
| | - Rafe McBeth
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, United States of America
| | - Mu-Han Lin
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, United States of America
| | - Steve Jiang
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Wang W, Sheng Y, Palta M, Czito B, Willett C, Hito M, Yin FF, Wu Q, Ge Y, Wu QJ. Deep Learning-Based Fluence Map Prediction for Pancreas Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy With Simultaneous Integrated Boost. Adv Radiat Oncol 2021; 6:100672. [PMID: 33997484 PMCID: PMC8099762 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2020] [Revised: 12/29/2020] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Treatment planning for pancreas stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a challenging task, especially with simultaneous integrated boost treatment approaches. We propose a deep learning (DL) framework to accurately predict fluence maps from patient anatomy and directly generate intensity modulated radiation therapy plans. Methods and Materials The framework employs 2 convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to sequentially generate beam dose prediction and fluence map prediction, creating a deliverable 9-beam intensity modulated radiation therapy plan. Within the beam dose prediction CNN, axial slices of combined structure contour masks are used to predict 3-dimensional (3D) beam doses for each beam. Each 3D beam dose is projected along its beam’s-eye-view to form a 2D beam dose map, which is subsequently used by the fluence map prediction CNN to predict its fluence map. Finally, the 9 predicted fluence maps are imported into the treatment planning system to finalize the plan by leaf sequencing and dose calculation. One hundred patients receiving pancreas SBRT were retrospectively collected for this study. Benchmark plans with unified simultaneous integrated boost prescription (25/33 Gy) were manually optimized for each case. The data set was split into 80/20 cases for training and testing. We evaluated the proposed DL framework by assessing both the fluence maps and the final predicted plans. Further, clinical acceptability of the plans was evaluated by a physician specializing in gastrointestinal cancer. Results The DL-based planning was, on average, completed in under 2 minutes. In testing, the predicted plans achieved similar dose distribution compared with the benchmark plans (-1.5% deviation for planning target volume 33 V33Gy), with slightly higher planning target volume maximum (+1.03 Gy) and organ at risk maximum (+0.95 Gy) doses. After renormalization, the physician rated 19 cases clinically acceptable and 1 case requiring minor improvement. Conclusions The DL framework can effectively plan pancreas SBRT cases within 2 minutes. The predicted plans are clinically deliverable, with plan quality approaching that of manual planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wentao Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.,Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Yang Sheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Manisha Palta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Brian Czito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Christopher Willett
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Martin Hito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.,Department of Computer Science, Princeton University, New Jersey
| | - Fang-Fang Yin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.,Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Qiuwen Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.,Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Yaorong Ge
- Department of Software and Information Systems, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Q Jackie Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.,Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
DVH Prediction for VMAT in NPC with GRU-RNN: An Improved Method by Considering Biological Effects. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2021; 2021:2043830. [PMID: 33532489 PMCID: PMC7837766 DOI: 10.1155/2021/2043830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2020] [Revised: 10/28/2020] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Purpose A recurrent neural network (RNN) and its variants such as gated recurrent unit-based RNN (GRU-RNN) were found to be very suitable for dose-volume histogram (DVH) prediction in our previously published work. Using the dosimetric information generated by nonmodulated beams of different orientations, the GRU-RNN model was capable of accurate DVH prediction for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treatment planning. On the basis of our previous work, we proposed an improved approach and aimed to further improve the DVH prediction accuracy as well as study the feasibility of applying the proposed method to relatively small-size patient data. Methods Eighty NPC volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans with local IRB's approval in recent two years were retrospectively and randomly selected in this study. All these original plans were created using the Eclipse treatment planning system (V13.5, Varian Medical Systems, USA) with ≥95% of PGTVnx receiving the prescribed doses of 70 Gy, ≥95% of PGTVnd receiving 66 Gy, and ≥95% of PTV receiving 60 Gy. Among them, fifty plans were used to train the DVH prediction model, and the remaining were used for testing. On the basis of our previously published work, we simplified the 3-layer GRU-RNN model to a single-layer model and further trained every organ at risk (OAR) separately with an OAR-specific equivalent uniform dose- (EUD-) based loss function. Results The results of linear least squares regression obtained by the new proposed method showed the excellent agreements between the predictions and the original plans with the correlation coefficient r = 0.976 and 0.968 for EUD results and maximum dose results, respectively, and the coefficient r of our previously published method was 0.957 and 0.946, respectively. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test results between the proposed and the previous work showed that the proposed method could significantly improve the EUD prediction accuracy for the brainstem, spinal cord, and temporal lobes with a p value < 0.01. Conclusions The accuracy of DVH prediction achieved in different OARs showed the great improvements compared to the previous works, and more importantly, the effectiveness and robustness showed by the simplified GRU-RNN trained from relatively small-size DVH samples, fully demonstrated the feasibility of applying the proposed method to small-size patient data. Excellent agreements in both EUD results and maximum dose results between the predictions and original plans indicated the application prospect in a physically and biologically related (or a mixture of both) model for treatment planning.
Collapse
|
39
|
Hu J, Liu B, Xie W, Zhu J, Yu X, Gu H, Wang M, Wang Y, Qi Z. Quantitative Comparison of Knowledge-Based and Manual Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Planning for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. Front Oncol 2021; 10:551763. [PMID: 33489869 PMCID: PMC7817947 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.551763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2020] [Accepted: 11/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To validate the feasibility and efficiency of a fully automatic knowledge-based planning (KBP) method for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) cases, with special attention to the possible way that the success rate of auto-planning can be improved. METHODS AND MATERIALS A knowledge-based dose volume histogram (DVH) prediction model was developed based on 99 formerly treated NPC patients, by means of which the optimization objectives and the corresponding priorities for intensity modulation radiation therapy (IMRT) planning were automatically generated for each head and neck organ at risk (OAR). The automatic KBP method was thus evaluated in 17 new NPC cases with comparison to manual plans (MP) and expert plans (EXP) in terms of target dose coverage, conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), and normal tissue protection. To quantify the plan quality, a metric was applied for plan evaluation. The variation in the plan quality and time consumption among planners was also investigated. RESULTS With comparable target dose distributions, the KBP method achieved a significant dose reduction in critical organs such as the optic chiasm (p<0.001), optic nerve (p=0.021), and temporal lobe (p<0.001), but failed to spare the spinal cord (p<0.001) compared with MPs and EXPs. The overall plan quality evaluation gave mean scores of 144.59±11.48, 142.71±15.18, and 144.82±15.17, respectively, for KBPs, MPs, and EXPs (p=0.259). A total of 15 out of 17 KBPs (i.e., 88.24%) were approved by our physician as clinically acceptable. CONCLUSION The automatic KBP method using the DVH prediction model provided a possible way to generate clinically acceptable plans in a short time for NPC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiang Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Boji Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Weihao Xie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jinhan Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaoli Yu
- Sun Yat-sen Memory Hospital, Guangzhou, China
| | - Huikuan Gu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Mingli Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yixuan Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| | - ZhenYu Qi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Xin X, Cheng C, Li C, Li J, Wang P, Yin G, Lang J. Comparative Study of Auto Plan and Manual Plan for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy . Cancer Manag Res 2020; 12:12439-12445. [PMID: 33293869 PMCID: PMC7719327 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s226495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2019] [Accepted: 02/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose and Objective Auto planning might reduce the manual time required for the optimization and could also potentially improve the overall plan quality. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the statistical comparison of automatic (AU) and manually (MA) generated nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans. Materials and Methods The study included 105 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients, admitted to our hospital. The patients underwent IMRT treatments. The clinically delivered plans were performed with Eclipse (Version 11.0) using manual optimization. The same plans were optimized successively in PinnacleTM3 (version 9.10) treatment planning system using the auto plan software package module. D95 (dose of 95% volume) and D98 (dose of 98% volume) were calculated for the targets and maximum dose (Dmax) and mean dose (Dmean) for the organ at risks (OARs); moreover, the average doses of each target and OARs for 105 patients were evaluated. Results There is no significant difference in the homogeneity of the target between AU and MA treatment plans, while a significant difference is observed for what is concerning the OARs or most of OARs in 105 patients, OAR doses were significantly reduced in AU plan. For OARs which have no significant difference between AU and MA plans are highlighted, the mean dose of OARs in AU plans was at least not higher than MA plans. Conclusion Nasopharyngeal carcinoma IMRT plans made by an automatic planning tool met the clinical requirements for target prescription dose; moreover, the dose of normal tissues was lower than in MA plans. Clinical physicists' time can be saved and the influence of factors such as the lack of experience in treatment planning can be avoided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Xin
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Chuandong Cheng
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Churong Li
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jie Li
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Pei Wang
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
| | - Gang Yin
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
- Correspondence: Gang Yin; Jinyi Lang Department of Radiation Therapy, Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, No. 55, The 4th Section of Renmin South Road, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China Email ;
| | - Jinyi Lang
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Alnaalwa B, Nwankwo O, Abo-Madyan Y, Giordano FA, Wenz F, Glatting G. A knowledge-based quantitative approach to characterize treatment plan quality: Application to prostate VMAT planning. Med Phys 2020; 48:94-104. [PMID: 33119944 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2020] [Revised: 09/21/2020] [Accepted: 10/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To characterize treatment plan (TP) quality, a quantitative quality control (QC) tool is proposed. The tool is validated using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans for treatment of prostate cancer by estimating the achievable organ at risk (OAR) sparing, based on the knowledge learned from prior plans. METHODS Prostate TP quality was investigated by evaluating the achieved OAR sparing in the rectum and bladder, based on their proximity to target surface. The knowledge base used in this work comprises 450 plans, consisting of 181 homogenous prostate plans and 269 simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) prostate plans. A knowledge-based algorithm was used to relate the absorbed doses of the OARs (rectum and bladder) and their proximity to the planning target volume (PTV). A metric (Mq,r value) was calculated to characterize the OAR sparing based on the weighted differences of the mean doses at binned distances to the PTV surface. The 90% probability ellipse of the normally distributed OARs Mq,r values was considered to define a threshold above which the treatment plan was re-optimized. RESULTS Following re-optimization, 8/11 of the homogenous plans and 6/13 of the SIB plans outside the 90% probability ellipse could be re-optimized to gain better OAR sparing while achieving the same or better target coverage. However, 3/4 of the homogenous TPs and 1/9 of the SIB TPs between 80% and 90% were improved. Mq,r values of bladder and rectum after re-optimizing the plans in both groups of homogenous and SIB showed lower values compared to the corresponding values before re-optimization, which implies that better OARs sparing was achieved. CONCLUSIONS This work demonstrates an effective anatomy-specific QC tool for identifying suboptimal plans and determining the achievable OAR sparing for each individual patient anatomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Buthayna Alnaalwa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, Mannheim, D-68167, Germany
| | - Obioma Nwankwo
- Strahlentherapie RheinMainNahe, Standort Rüsselsheim, August-Bebel-Str. 59d, Rüsselsheim, 65428, Germany
| | - Yasser Abo-Madyan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, Mannheim, D-68167, Germany
| | - Frank A Giordano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, Mannheim, D-68167, Germany
| | - Frederik Wenz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, Mannheim, D-68167, Germany
| | - Gerhard Glatting
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Universität Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Ulm, 89081, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Aliotta E, Nourzadeh H, Choi W, Leandro Alves VG, Siebers JV. An Automated Workflow to Improve Efficiency in Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning by Prioritizing Organs at Risk. Adv Radiat Oncol 2020; 5:1324-1333. [PMID: 33305095 PMCID: PMC7718498 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2020] [Revised: 04/15/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Manual delineation (MD) of organs at risk (OAR) is time and labor intensive. Auto-delineation (AD) can reduce the need for MD, but because current algorithms are imperfect, manual review and modification is still typically used. Recognizing that many OARs are sufficiently far from important dose levels that they do not pose a realistic risk, we hypothesize that some OARs can be excluded from MD and manual review with no clinical effect. The purpose of this study was to develop a method that automatically identifies these OARs and enables more efficient workflows that incorporate AD without degrading clinical quality. METHODS AND MATERIALS Preliminary dose map estimates were generated for n = 10 patients with head and neck cancers using only prescription and target-volume information. Conservative estimates of clinical OAR objectives were computed using AD structures with spatial expansion buffers to account for potential delineation uncertainties. OARs with estimated dose metrics below clinical tolerances were deemed low priority and excluded from MD and/or manual review. Final plans were then optimized using high-priority MD OARs and low-priority AD OARs and compared with reference plans generated using all MD OARs. Multiple different spatial buffers were used to accommodate different potential delineation uncertainties. RESULTS Sixty-seven out of 201 total OARs were identified as low-priority using the proposed methodology, which permitted a 33% reduction in structures requiring manual delineation/review. Plans optimized using low-priority AD OARs without review or modification met all planning objectives that were met when all MD OARs were used, indicating clinical equivalence. CONCLUSIONS Prioritizing OARs using estimated dose distributions allowed a substantial reduction in required MD and review without affecting clinically relevant dosimetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Aliotta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Hamidreza Nourzadeh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Wookjin Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | | | - Jeffrey V. Siebers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Jaiswal S, Kumar M, Mandeep, Sunita, Singh Y, Shukla P. Systems Biology Approaches for Therapeutics Development Against COVID-19. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2020; 10:560240. [PMID: 33194800 PMCID: PMC7655984 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.560240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2020] [Accepted: 09/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Understanding the systems biology approaches for promoting the development of new therapeutic drugs is attaining importance nowadays. The threat of COVID-19 outbreak needs to be vanished for global welfare, and every section of research is focusing on it. There is an opportunity for finding new, quick, and accurate tools for developing treatment options, including the vaccine against COVID-19. The review at this moment covers various aspects of pathogenesis and host factors for exploring the virus target and developing suitable therapeutic solutions through systems biology tools. Furthermore, this review also covers the extensive details of multiomics tools i.e., transcriptomics, proteomics, genomics, lipidomics, immunomics, and in silico computational modeling aiming towards the study of host-virus interactions in search of therapeutic targets against the COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shweta Jaiswal
- Enzyme Technology and Protein Bioinformatics Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, India
| | - Mohit Kumar
- Soil Microbial Ecology and Environmental Toxicology Laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
- Department of Zoology, Hindu College, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
| | - Mandeep
- Enzyme Technology and Protein Bioinformatics Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, India
| | - Sunita
- Enzyme Technology and Protein Bioinformatics Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, India
- Bacterial Pathogenesis Laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
| | - Yogendra Singh
- Bacterial Pathogenesis Laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
| | - Pratyoosh Shukla
- Enzyme Technology and Protein Bioinformatics Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, India
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Thomas MA, Olick-Gibson J, Fu Y, Parikh PJ, Green O, Yang D. Using prediction models to evaluate magnetic resonance image guided radiation therapy plans. PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY 2020; 16:99-102. [PMID: 33458351 PMCID: PMC7807572 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2020.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2020] [Revised: 10/01/2020] [Accepted: 10/02/2020] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Comprehensive analysis of daily, online adaptive plan quality and safety in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guided radiation therapy is critical to its widespread use. Artificial neural network models developed with offline plans created after simulation were used to analyze and compare online plans that were adapted and reoptimized in real time prior to treatment. Roughly one third of 60Co adapted plans were of inferior quality relative to fully optimized, offline plans, but MRI-linac adapted plans were essentially equivalent to offline plans. The models also enabled clear justification that MRI-linac plans are superior to 60Co in an overwhelming majority of cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Allan Thomas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63108, United States.,Department of Imaging Physics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States
| | - Joshua Olick-Gibson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63108, United States
| | - Yabo Fu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63108, United States.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30332, United States
| | - Parag J Parikh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI 48202, United States
| | - Olga Green
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63108, United States
| | - Deshan Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63108, United States
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Zhang J, Wang C, Sheng Y, Palta M, Czito B, Willett C, Zhang J, Jensen PJ, Yin FF, Wu Q, Ge Y, Wu QJ. An Interpretable Planning Bot for Pancreas Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 109:1076-1085. [PMID: 33115686 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.10.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2020] [Revised: 10/06/2020] [Accepted: 10/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Pancreas stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) treatment planning requires planners to make sequential, time-consuming interactions with the treatment planning system to reach the optimal dose distribution. We sought to develop a reinforcement learning (RL)-based planning bot to systematically address complex tradeoffs and achieve high plan quality consistently and efficiently. METHODS AND MATERIALS The focus of pancreas SBRT planning is finding a balance between organ-at-risk sparing and planning target volume (PTV) coverage. Planners evaluate dose distributions and make planning adjustments to optimize PTV coverage while adhering to organ-at-risk dose constraints. We formulated such interactions between the planner and treatment planning system into a finite-horizon RL model. First, planning status features were evaluated based on human planners' experience and defined as planning states. Second, planning actions were defined to represent steps that planners would commonly implement to address different planning needs. Finally, we derived a reward system based on an objective function guided by physician-assigned constraints. The planning bot trained itself with 48 plans augmented from 16 previously treated patients, and generated plans for 24 cases in a separate validation set. RESULTS All 24 bot-generated plans achieved similar PTV coverages compared with clinical plans while satisfying all clinical planning constraints. Moreover, the knowledge learned by the bot could be visualized and interpreted as consistent with human planning knowledge, and the knowledge maps learned in separate training sessions were consistent, indicating reproducibility of the learning process. CONCLUSIONS We developed a planning bot that generates high-quality treatment plans for pancreas SBRT. We demonstrated that the training phase of the bot is tractable and reproducible, and the knowledge acquired is interpretable. As a result, the RL planning bot can potentially be incorporated into the clinical workflow and reduce planning inefficiencies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiahan Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham North Carolina.
| | - Chunhao Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham North Carolina
| | - Yang Sheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham North Carolina
| | - Manisha Palta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham North Carolina
| | - Brian Czito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham North Carolina
| | - Christopher Willett
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham North Carolina
| | - Jiang Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham North Carolina
| | - P James Jensen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham North Carolina
| | - Fang-Fang Yin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham North Carolina
| | - Qiuwen Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham North Carolina
| | - Yaorong Ge
- University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte North Carolina
| | - Q Jackie Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Wang M, Zhang Q, Lam S, Cai J, Yang R. A Review on Application of Deep Learning Algorithms in External Beam Radiotherapy Automated Treatment Planning. Front Oncol 2020; 10:580919. [PMID: 33194711 PMCID: PMC7645101 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.580919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2020] [Accepted: 09/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Treatment planning plays an important role in the process of radiotherapy (RT). The quality of the treatment plan directly and significantly affects patient treatment outcomes. In the past decades, technological advances in computer and software have promoted the development of RT treatment planning systems with sophisticated dose calculation and optimization algorithms. Treatment planners now have greater flexibility in designing highly complex RT treatment plans in order to mitigate the damage to healthy tissues better while maximizing radiation dose to tumor targets. Nevertheless, treatment planning is still largely a time-inefficient and labor-intensive process in current clinical practice. Artificial intelligence, including machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), has been recently used to automate RT treatment planning and has gained enormous attention in the RT community due to its great promises in improving treatment planning quality and efficiency. In this article, we reviewed the historical advancement, strengths, and weaknesses of various DL-based automated RT treatment planning techniques. We have also discussed the challenges, issues, and potential research directions of DL-based automated RT treatment planning techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mingqing Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Qilin Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Saikit Lam
- Department of Health Technology and Informatics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China
| | - Jing Cai
- Department of Health Technology and Informatics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China
| | - Ruijie Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Kandalan RN, Nguyen D, Rezaeian NH, Barragán-Montero AM, Breedveld S, Namuduri K, Jiang S, Lin MH. Dose prediction with deep learning for prostate cancer radiation therapy: Model adaptation to different treatment planning practices. Radiother Oncol 2020; 153:228-235. [PMID: 33098927 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.10.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Revised: 10/17/2020] [Accepted: 10/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This work aims to study the generalizability of a pre-developed deep learning (DL) dose prediction model for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for prostate cancer and to adapt the model, via transfer learning with minimal input data, to three different internal treatment planning styles and one external institution planning style. METHODS We built the source model with planning data from 108 patients previously treated with VMAT for prostate cancer. For the transfer learning, we selected patient cases planned with three different styles, 14-29 cases per style, in the same institution and 20 cases treated in a different institution to adapt the source model to four target models in total. We compared the dose distributions predicted by the source model and the target models with the corresponding clinical plan dose used for patient treatments and quantified the improvement in the prediction quality for the target models over the source model using the Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) of 0% to 100% isodose volumes and the dose-volume-histogram (DVH) parameters of the planning target volume and the organs-at-risk. RESULTS The source model accurately predicts dose distributions for plans generated in the same source style, but performs sub-optimally for the three different internal and one external target styles, with the mean DSC ranging between 0.81-0.94 and 0.82-0.91 for the internal and the external styles, respectively. With transfer learning, the target model predictions improved the mean DSC to 0.88-0.95 and 0.92-0.96 for the internal and the external styles, respectively. Target model predictions significantly improved the accuracy of the DVH parameter predictions to within 1.6%. CONCLUSION We demonstrated the problem of model generalizability for DL-based dose prediction and the feasibility of using transfer learning to solve this problem. With 14-29 cases per style, we successfully adapted the source model into several different practice styles. This indicates a realistic way forward to widespread clinical implementation of DL-based dose prediction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roya Norouzi Kandalan
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA; Department of Electrical Engineering, University of North Texas, Denton, USA
| | - Dan Nguyen
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA
| | - Nima Hassan Rezaeian
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | | | - Sebastiaan Breedveld
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center - Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kamesh Namuduri
- Department of Electrical Engineering, University of North Texas, Denton, USA
| | - Steve Jiang
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA.
| | - Mu-Han Lin
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Liu Z, Chen X, Men K, Yi J, Dai J. A deep learning model to predict dose–volume histograms of organs at risk in radiotherapy treatment plans. Med Phys 2020; 47:5467-5481. [PMID: 32677104 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2020] [Revised: 06/19/2020] [Accepted: 07/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Zhiqiang Liu
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College No. 17 Panjiayuannanli, Chaoyang District Beijing100021 China
| | - Xinyuan Chen
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College No. 17 Panjiayuannanli, Chaoyang District Beijing100021 China
| | - Kuo Men
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College No. 17 Panjiayuannanli, Chaoyang District Beijing100021 China
| | - Junlin Yi
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College No. 17 Panjiayuannanli, Chaoyang District Beijing100021 China
| | - Jianrong Dai
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College No. 17 Panjiayuannanli, Chaoyang District Beijing100021 China
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Jihong C, Penggang B, Xiuchun Z, Kaiqiang C, Wenjuan C, Yitao D, Jiewei Q, Kerun Q, Jing Z, Tianming W. Automated Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning for Cervical Cancer Based on Convolution Neural Network. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2020; 19:1533033820957002. [PMID: 33016230 PMCID: PMC7543127 DOI: 10.1177/1533033820957002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To develop and evaluate an automatic intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) program for cervical cancer, including a Convolution Neural Network (CNN)-based prediction model and an automated optimization strategy. Methods: A CNN deep learning model was trained to predict a patient-specify set of IMRT objectives based on overlap volume histograms (OVH) and high-quality plan of previous patients. A total of 140 cervical cancer patients were enrolled in this study, including 100 patients in the training set, 20 patients in the validation set and 20 patients in the testing set. The input of this model was OVH data and the output were values of IMRT plan objectives. For patients in the testing set, the set of planning objectives were predicted by the CNN model and used to automatically generate IMRT plans. Meanwhile, manual plans of these patients were generated by 1 beginner planner and 1 senior planner respectively. Finally, dose distribution, dosimetric parameters and planning time were analyzed. In addition, the 3 types of plans were blinded compared and ranked by an experienced oncologist. Results: There were almost no statistically differences among these 3 types of plans in target coverage and dose conformity. Dose homogeneity were slightly decreased while the average dose and parameters for most organs-at-risk (OARs) were decreased in automatic plans. Especially in comparison with manual plans by the beginner planner, V40 of bladder and rectum decreased 6.3% and 12.3%, while mean dose of rectum and marrow were 1.1 Gy and 1.8 Gy lower with automatic plans (either P < 0.017). In the blinded comparison, automatic plans were chosen as best plan in 14 cases. Conclusions: For cervical cancer, automatic IMRT plans optimized from the CNN generated objectives have superior dose sparing without compromising of target dose. It significantly reduced the planning time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen Jihong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Bai Penggang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Zhang Xiuchun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Chen Kaiqiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Chen Wenjuan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Dai Yitao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Qian Jiewei
- School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of South China, Hengyang, China
| | - Quan Kerun
- School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of South China, Hengyang, China
| | - Zhong Jing
- Department of Radiology, Fujian Cancer Hospital & Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Wu Tianming
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago Medicine, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Treatment plan quality assessment for radiotherapy of rectal cancer patients using prediction of organ-at-risk dose metrics. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2020; 16:74-80. [PMID: 33458347 PMCID: PMC7807565 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2020.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2020] [Revised: 10/08/2020] [Accepted: 10/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Radiotherapy centers frequently lack simple tools for periodic treatment plan verification and feedback on current plan quality. It is difficult to measure treatment quality over different years or during the planning process. Here, we implemented plan quality assurance (QA) by developing a database of dose-volume histogram (DVH) metrics and a prediction model. These tools were used to assess automatically optimized treatment plans for rectal cancer patients, based on cohort analysis. Material and methods A treatment plan QA framework was established and an overlap volume histogram based model was used to predict DVH parameters for cohorts of patients treated in 2018 and 2019 and grouped according to planning technique. A training cohort of 22 re-optimized treatment plans was used to make the prediction model. The prediction model was validated on 95 automatically generated treatment plans (automatically optimized cohort) and 93 manually optimized plans (manually optimized cohort). Results For the manually optimized cohort, on average the prediction deviated less than 0.3 ± 1.4 Gy and −4.3 ± 5.5 Gy, for the mean doses to the bowel bag and bladder, respectively; for the automatically optimized cohort a smaller deviation was observed: −0.1 ± 1.1 Gy and −0.2 ± 2.5 Gy, respectively. The interquartile range of DVH parameters was on average smaller for the automatically optimized cohort, indicating less variation within each parameter compared to manual planning. Conclusion An automated framework to monitor treatment quality with a DVH prediction model was successfully implemented clinically and revealed less variation in DVH parameters for automated in comparison to manually optimized plans. The framework also allowed for individual feedback and DVH estimation.
Collapse
|