Dose Constraint for Minimizing Grade 2 Rectal Bleeding Following Brachytherapy Combined With External Beam Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: Rectal Dose-Volume Histogram Analysis of 457 Patients

Trimodality Therapy With Iodine-125 Brachytherapy, External Beam Radiation Therapy, and Short- or Long-Term Androgen Deprivation Therapy for High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer: Results of a Multicenter, Randomized Phase 3 Trial (TRIP/TRIGU0907)

PURPOSE

This phase 3 randomized investigation was designed to determine whether 30 months of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was superior to 6 months of ADT when combined with brachytherapy and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for localized high-risk prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This study was conducted at 37 hospitals on men aged 40 to 79 years, with stage T2c-3a, prostate-specific antigen >20 ng/mL, or Gleason score >7, who received 6 months of ADT combined with iodine-125 brachytherapy followed by EBRT. After stratification, patients were randomly assigned to either no further treatment (short arm) or 24 months of adjuvant ADT (long arm). According to the Phoenix definition of failure, the primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of biochemical progression. Secondary endpoints included clinical progression, metastasis, salvage treatment, disease-specific mortality, overall survival, and grade 3+ adverse events. An intention-to-treat analysis was conducted using survival estimates determined using competing risk analyses.

RESULTS

Of 332 patients, 165 and 167 were randomly assigned to the short and long arms, respectively. The median follow-up period was 9.2 years. The cumulative incidence of biochemical progression at 7 years was 9.0% (95% CI, 5.5-14.5) and 8.0% (4.7-13.5) in the short and long arms, respectively (P = .65). The outcomes of secondary endpoints did not differ significantly between the arms. Incidence rates of endocrine- and radiation-related grade 3+ adverse events for the short versus long arms were 0.6 versus 1.8% (P = .62) and 1.2 versus 0.6% (P = .62), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Both treatment arms showed similar efficacy among selected populations with high-risk features. The toxicity of the trimodal therapy was acceptable. The present investigation, designed as a superiority trial, failed to demonstrate that 30-month ADT yielded better biochemical control than 6-month ADT when combined with brachytherapy and EBRT. Therefore, a noninferiority study is warranted to obtain further evidence supporting these preliminary results.

Uncertainty in magnetic resonance imaging-based prostate postimplant dosimetry: Results of a 10-person human observer study, and comparisons with automatic postimplant dosimetry

PURPOSE

Uncertainties in postimplant quality assessment (QA) for low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (LDRPBT) are introduced at two steps: seed localization and contouring. We quantified how interobserver variability (IoV) introduced in both steps impacts dose-volume-histogram (DVH) parameters for MRI-based LDRPBT, and compared it with automatically derived DVH parameters.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty-five patients received MRI-based LDRPBT. Seven clinical observers contoured the prostate and four organs at risk, and 4 dosimetrists performed seed localization, on each MRI. Twenty-eight unique manual postimplant QAs were created for each patient from unique observer pairs. Reference QA and automatic QA were also performed for each patient. IoV of prostate, rectum, and external urinary sphincter (EUS) DVH parameters owing to seed localization and contouring was quantified with coefficients of variation. Automatically derived DVH parameters were compared with those of the reference plans.

RESULTS

Coefficients of variation (CoVs) owing to contouring variability (CoVcontours) were significantly higher than those due to seed localization variability (CoVseeds) (median CoVcontours vs. median CoVseeds: prostate D90-15.12% vs. 0.65%, p < 0.001; prostate V100-5.36% vs. 0.37%, p < 0.001; rectum V100-79.23% vs. 8.69%, p < 0.001; EUS V200-107.74% vs. 21.18%, p < 0.001). CoVcontours were lower when the contouring observers were restricted to the 3 radiation oncologists, but were still markedly higher than CoVseeds. Median differences in prostate D90, prostate V100, rectum V100, and EUS V200 between automatically computed and reference dosimetry parameters were 3.16%, 1.63%, -0.00 mL, and -0.00 mL, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Seed localization introduces substantially less variability in postimplant QA than does contouring for MRI-based LDRPBT. While automatic seed localization may potentially help improve workflow efficiency, it has limited potential for improving the consistency and quality of postimplant dosimetry.

Chronological changes of lower urinary tract symptoms after low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer using SpaceOAR® system

Background

The aim of this study is to investigate chronological changes of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in patients with prostate cancer who underwent low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) followed by the insertion of SpaceOAR® system (SpaceOAR).

Methods

In this retrospective study, 483 patients with localized prostate cancer underwent LDR-BT at the Gifu University Hospital between August 2004 and December 2020. SpaceOAR was inserted in 30 patients after LDR-BT (SpaceOAR group), and 453 patients received LDR-BT alone (non-SpaceOAR group). The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS), quality of life due to urinary symptoms (IPSS-QOL), and uroflowmetry (UFM), including maximum flow rate (Qmax), voided volume, and post-voided residual urine (PVR), were evaluated before LDR-BT, and at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after LDR-BT. The outcomes were chronological changes in IPSS, OABSS, and IPSS-QOL compared to pretreatment values and those of covariates in relation to UFM.

Results

The IPSS, OABSS, IPSS-QOL, Qmax, and voided volume were not significantly associated with either group. According to the PVR interaction effect, the insertion of SpaceOAR was significantly affected by chronological changes in PVR (P = 0.001). Three months after LDR-BT, PVR in the SpaceOAR group was significantly higher than that in the non-SpaceOAR group (49.8 mL vs. 30.5 mL; P = 0.002).

Conclusion

SpaceOAR use may temporally increase PVR; however, IPSS, OABSS, IPSS-QOL, Qmax, and voided volume were not significantly associated with LUTS before and after LDR-BT. The combination of LDR-BT and SpaceOAR may be acceptable for treating patients with prostate cancer regarding the chronological changes in LUTS after brachytherapy.

Case Report: Role of an Iodinated Rectal Hydrogel Spacer, SpaceOAR Vue™, in the Context of Low-Dose-Rate Prostate Brachytherapy, for Enhanced Post-Operative Contouring to Aid in Accurate Implant Evaluation and Dosimetry

We present a case series of 13 consecutive patients with prostate cancer treated with low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy, utilizing SpaceOAR Vue™, the recent iodinated iteration of the SpaceOAR™ hydrogel rectal spacer. Low- and favorable intermediate-risk patients receiving monotherapy and unfavorable intermediate- and high-risk patients undergoing a brachytherapy boost were included. Permanent brachytherapy can result in subacute and late rectal toxicity, and precise contouring of the anterior rectal wall and posterior aspect of the prostate is essential for accurate dosimetry to confirm a safe implant. Clearly visible on non-contrast CT imaging, SpaceOAR Vue™ can substantially aid in post-implant contouring and analysis. Not previously described in the literature in the context of LDR brachytherapy, we demonstrate the added clinical benefit of placing a well-visualized rectal spacer.

Computer-aided segmentation on MRI for prostate radiotherapy, Part I: Quantifying human interobserver variability of the prostate and organs at risk and its impact on radiation dosimetry

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Quantifying the interobserver variability (IoV) of prostate and periprostatic anatomy delineation on prostate MRI is necessary to inform its use for treatment planning, treatment delivery, and treatment quality assessment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty five prostate cancer patients underwent MRI-based low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (LDRPBT). The patients were scanned with a 3D T2-weighted sequence for treatment planning and a 3D T2/T1-weighted sequence for quality assessment. Seven observers involved with the LDRPBT workflow delineated the prostate, external urinary sphincter (EUS), seminal vesicles, rectum, and bladder on all 50 MRIs. IoV was assessed by measuring contour similarity metrics, differences in organ volumes, and differences in dosimetry parameters between unique observer pairs. Measurements from a group of 3 radiation oncologists (G1) were compared against those from a group consisting of the other 4 clinical observers (G2).

RESULTS

IoV of the prostate was lower for G1 than G2 (Matthew's correlation coefficient [MCC], G1 vs. G2: planning-0.906 vs. 0.870, p < 0.001; postimplant-0.899 vs. 0.861, p < 0.001). IoV of the EUS was highest of all the organs for both groups, but was lower for G1 (MCC, G1 vs. G2: planning-0.659 vs. 0.402, p < 0.001; postimplant-0.684 vs. 0.398, p < 0.001). Large differences in prostate dosimetry parameters were observed (G1 maximum absolute prostate ΔD90: planning-76.223 Gy, postimplant-36.545 Gy; G1 maximum absolute prostate ΔV100: planning-13.927%, postimplant-8.860%).

CONCLUSIONS

While MRI is optimal in the management of prostate cancer with radiation therapy, significant interobserver variability of the prostate and external urinary sphincter still exist.

Incidence and dosimetric predictive factors of late rectal toxicity after low-dose-rate brachytherapy combined with volumetric modulated arc therapy in high-risk prostate cancer at a single institution: Retrospective study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to investigate the incidence of rectal toxicity and to identify the associated dosimetric predictive parameters after I-125 seed low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) combined with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and dose constraints.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In total, 110 patients with high-risk prostate cancer received 110 Gy LDR-BT, followed by 45 Gy VMAT. Rectal toxicity was recorded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v.4.03. The dosimetric factors associated with LDR-BT and VMAT were analyzed to determine their relationship with rectal toxicity. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed for ≥ grade 2 (G2) rectal toxicity prediction.

RESULTS

The follow-up duration was 10.1-115.2 months (median 60.5 months). Seven patients had G2 rectal hemorrhage, and none of the patients had grade 3 rectal hemorrhage. In the univariate analysis, the rectal volume receiving 100% of the prescribed dose (rV₁₀₀) (p < 0.001), the dose covering 2 cc of the rectum (rD_2cc) during LDR-BT (p = 0.002), and the combined rD_2cc during LDR-BT and VMAT (p = 0.001) were identified as predictors of G2 rectal hemorrhage. In the ROC curve analysis, the cutoff value was 0.46 cc for rV₁₀₀, 74.0 Gy for rD_2cc, and 86.8 GyEQD₂ for combined rD_2cc.

CONCLUSION

Predictors of late ≥ G2 rectal hemorrhage are rV₁₀₀, rD_2cc, and combined rD_2cc. The incidence of rectal toxicity is low and acceptable in this setting and is highly dependent on the rectal dose of LDR-BT. The use of higher-quality LDR-BT and VMAT dose constraints may further reduce the rate of rectal hemorrhage.

Inter- and intra-fractional stability of rectal gas in pelvic cancer patients during MRIgRT

PURPOSE

Due to the electron return effect (ERE) during magnetic resonance imaging guided radiotherapy (MRIgRT), rectal gas during pelvic treatments can result in hot spots of over-dosage in the rectal wall. Determining the clinical impact of this effect on rectal toxicity requires estimation of the amount and mobility (and stability) of rectal gas during treatment. We therefore investigated the amount of rectal gas and local inter- and intra-fractional changes of rectal gas in pelvic cancer patients.

METHODS

To estimate the volume of gas present at treatment planning, the rectal gas contents in the planning computed tomography (CT) scans of 124 bladder, 70 cervical and 2180 prostate cancer patients were calculated. To estimate inter- and intra-fractional variations in rectal gas, 174 and 131 T2-w MRIs for six cervical and eleven bladder cancer patients were used. These scans were acquired during four scan-sessions (~20-25 min each) at various time-points. Additionally, 258 T2-w MRIs of the first five prostate cancer patients treated using MRIgRT at our center, acquired during each fraction, were analyzed. Rectums were delineated on all scans. The area of gas within the rectum delineations was identified on each MRI slice using thresholding techniques. The area of gas on each slice of the rectum was used to calculate the inter- and intra-fractional group mean, systematic and random variations along the length of the rectum. The cumulative dose perturbation as a result of the gas was estimated. Two approaches were explored: accounting or not accounting for the gas at the start of the scan-session.

RESULTS

Intra-fractional variations in rectal gas are small compared to the absolute volume of rectal gas detected for all patient groups. That is, rectal gas is likely to remain stable for periods of 20-25 min. Larger volumes of gas and larger variations in gas volume were observed in bladder cancer patients compared with cervical and prostate cancer patients. For all patients, local cumulative dose perturbations per beam over an entire treatment in the order of 60 % were estimated when gas had not been accounted for in the daily adaption. The calculated dose perturbation over the whole treatment was dramatically reduced in all patients when accounting for the gas in the daily set-up image.

CONCLUSION

Rectal gas in pelvic cancer patients is likely to remain stable over the course of an MRIgRT fraction, and also likely to reappear in the same location in multiple fractions, and can therefore result in clinically relevant over-dosage in the rectal wall. The over-dosage is reduced when accounting for gas in the daily adaption.

Predictive factors of rectal hemorrhage in patients with localized prostate cancer who underwent low-dose-rate brachytherapy

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the association between clinical covariates or the prescribed radiation dose for the prostate and rectal hemorrhage in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) who received iodine-125 low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT group) or the combination of LDR-BT and external beam radiation therapy (CMT group).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In this retrospective study, we reviewed the clinical records of 298 consecutive PCa patients with clinical stage T1c/T2 who underwent LDR-BT between August 2004 and August 2016 at a single institution. The prescribed minimum peripheral doses were 145 Gy for the LDR-BT group and 104 Gy for the CMT group. The dosimetric parameters analyzed were minimal dose received by 90% of the prostate gland, biologically effective dose, and rectal volume receiving 100% (RV100) or 150% of the prescribed dose. The endpoint of this study was the onset of any-grade clinical rectal hemorrhage after treatment.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 6.8 years. The 5-year overall survival rate was found to be 98.3%, and two patients (0.7%) reported biochemical recurrence during follow-up period. A total of 33 patients (11%) experienced rectal hemorrhage. However, ≥ grade 2 rectal hemorrhage occurred in eight patients (2.7%). On multivariate analysis, CMT, RV100 ≥ 0.66 mL, and hemorrhoids before treatment were identified as predictors of rectal hemorrhage after radiation therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Maximal reduction of the rectal dose seems very important to prevent serious rectal hemorrhage. In addition, we should consider the risk of rectal toxicities in patients with abnormalities in the rectal mucosa, especially hemorrhoids.

Assessing localized dosimetric effects due to unplanned gas cavities during pelvic MR-guided radiotherapy using Monte Carlo simulations

PURPOSE

It has been proposed that beam modulation and opposing beam configurations can cancel effects of the Electron Return Effect (ERE) during MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT). However, this may not always be the case for unplanned gas cavities outside of the target in the pelvic region. We evaluate dosimetric effects, including effects in the rectal wall, due to unplanned spherical air cavities during MRgRT.

METHODS

Nine virtual cuboid water phantoms containing spherical air cavities (0.5-7.5 cm diameter) and a reference phantom without air were created. Monte Carlo dose calculations of 7 MV photons under the influence of a 1.5 T transverse magnetic field were produced using Monaco 5.19.02 Treatment Planning System (TPS) (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden). Cavities in the path of a single and multiple beam plans were considered. Dose distributions of phantoms with and without air cavities were compared (ΔD% ) using a spherical coordinate system originating in the center of the cavity. Effects in the rectal wall were quantified by comparing dose volume histogram (DVH) parameters for solid and gaseous filling from simulated rectal wall structures.

RESULTS

Max(ΔD% ) of ~70% and 20% were observed around large cavities in the path of a single and multiple beam plans, respectively. Approximately 45 cm3 of phantom surrounding the largest cavity in a single beam received dose changes of >10%. Dmean in the rectal wall was unchanged when comparing gaseous and solid filling in the path of a single beam; however, D1cc and Dmax increased by up to ~45% and ~63%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Unplanned gas cavities in the path of a single beam during pelvic MRgRT with a 1.5 T transverse magnetic field cause dose changes which may impact toxicity in the rectal wall, depending on local dose and fractionation. Effects are reduced but not eliminated with a five-beam plan.

Clinical outcomes of 125I brachytherapy with and without external-beam radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: results from 300 patients at a single institution in Japan

The aim of this study was to determine the outcomes and adverse events for 300 men with prostate cancer treated with 125iodine (125I) brachytherapy with and without external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) at a single institution in Japan. Between February 2005 and November 2011, 300 consecutive patients with clinically localized prostate cancer were treated with 125I brachytherapy at the Nagoya University Hospital. A total of 271 men were treated with implants with doses of 145 Gy, and 29 men were treated with implants with doses of 110 Gy combined with EBRT (40-50 Gy/20-25 fractions). The median patient age was 69 years (range, 53-83 years). The median follow-up period was 53 months (range, 5-99 months). According to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk classification, 132 men (44%) had low-risk, 147 men (29%) had intermediate-risk and 21 men (7%) had high-risk disease. The 5-year overall survival rate, biochemical relapse-free survival rate, and disease-specific survival rates were 93.5%, 97.3% and 98.5%, respectively. Two men (0.6%) died of prostate cancer and 10 men (3.3%) died of other causes. Seventeen men (5.6%) experienced Grade 2 rectal bleeding in all: 12 (41.4%) of 29 in brachytherapy with EBRT, and 5 (1.8%) of 271 in brachytherapy alone. The rates of Grade 2 and 3 genitourinary toxicity were 1.0% and 1.7%, respectively. Excellent local control was achieved at our hospital for localized prostate cancer with 125I brachytherapy with and without EBRT. Gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicities were acceptable.

Evaluation of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion optimization for low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy

Purpose

Intraoperative planning with transrectal ultrasound (US) is used for accurate seed placement and optimal dosimetry in prostate brachytherapy. However, prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown superiority in delineation of prostate anatomy. Accordingly, MRI/US fusion may be useful for accurate intraoperative planning. We analyzed planning with MRI/US fusion to compare differences in dosimetry and volume to that derived from the postoperative computed tomography (CT).

Material and methods

Twenty patients underwent preoperative prostate MRI, which was fused intraoperatively with US during prostate brachytherapy. Intraoperative ¹²⁵I or ¹⁰³Pd seed placement was modified by the use of MRI fusion when indicated. Following implantation, dose comparisons were made between data derived from MRI/US and that from post-operative CT scans. Plan parameters analyzed included the D₉₀ (dose to 90% of the prostate), rectal D₃₀, V₃₀ (volume of the rectum receiving 30 percent of dose), and prostate V₁₀₀.

Results

The median number of seeds implanted per patient was seventy-six. The MRI measured prostate volume, which was on average 4.47 cc larger than the CT measured prostate volume. In 9 patients, the apex of the prostate was better identified under MRI with the fusion protocol, and an average of 4 fewer seeds were required to be placed in the apex/urinary sphincter region. Both MRI and US individually showed a reduced intraoperative prostate D₉₀ in comparison to the postoperative CT, with a larger mean difference for MRI in comparison with US (9.71 vs. 4.31 Gy, p = 0.007). This was also true for the prostate V₁₀₀ (5.18 vs. 2.73 cc, p = 0.009). Post-operative CT underestimated rectal D₃₀ and V₃₀ in comparison to both MRI and US with MRI showing a larger mean difference than US for D₃₀ (40.64 vs. 35.92 Gy, p = 0.04) and V₃₀ (50.20 vs. 44.38 cc, p = 0.009).

Conclusions

The MRI/US fusion demonstrated greater prostate volume compared to standard CT/US based planning likely due to the better resolution of the prostate apex. Furthermore, rectal dose was underestimated with CT vs. MRI based planning. Additional study is required to assess long-term clinical implications of disease control and effects on long-term toxicity, especially as related to the rectum and urinary sphincter. MRI/US intraoperative fusion may improve prostate dosimetry while sparing the rectum and urethra, potentially impacting disease control and late toxicity.

Evidenced-based clinical practice guideline for prostate cancer (summary: Japanese Urological Association, 2016 edition)

These guidelines cover a wide range of topics from prostate cancer epidemiology to palliative care. Questions arising in daily clinical practice have been extracted and formulated as clinical questions. In the 4 years since the previous edition, there have been major changes - for example, robot-assisted prostatectomy has rapidly come into widespread use, and new hormones and anticancer drugs have been developed for castration-resistant prostate cancer. In response to these developments, the number of fields included in this guideline was increased from 11 in the 2012 edition to 16, and the number of clinical questions was increased from 63 to 70. The number of papers identified in searches of the existing literature increased from 4662 in the first edition, published in 2006, to 10 490 in the 2012 edition. The number of references has reached 29 448 just during this review period, indicating the exponential increase in research on the topic of prostate cancer. Clinical answers have been prepared based on the latest evidence. Recommendation grades for the clinical answers were determined by radiologists, pathologists, and other specialists in addition to urologists in order to reflect the recent advances and diversity of prostate cancer treatment. Here, we present a short English version of the original guideline, and overview its key clinical issues.

Predictive factors of rectal toxicity after permanent iodine-125 seed implantation: Prospective cohort study in 2339 patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate the incidence and the associated factors of rectal toxicity in patients with prostate cancer undergoing permanent seed implantation (PI) with or without external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in a nationwide prospective cohort study in Japan (J-POPS) during the first 2 years.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 2,339 subjects were available for the analyses. Rectal toxicity was evaluated using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0.

RESULTS

The 3-year cumulative incidence for grade ≥2 rectal toxicity was 2.88%, 1.76%, and 6.53% in all subjects, PI group and EBRT combination therapy group, respectively. On multivariate analysis, among all subjects, grade ≥2 rectal toxicity was associated with rectal volumes receiving 100% of the prescribed dose (R₁₀₀; p < 0.0001) and EBRT combination therapy (p = 0.0066). R₁₀₀ in the PI group (p = 0.0254), and R₁₀₀ (p = 0.0011) and interactive planning (p = 0.0267) in the EBRT combination therapy group were also associated with grade ≥2 toxicity. The 3-year cumulative incidence of grade ≥2 rectal toxicity was 3.80% and 1.37% for R₁₀₀ ≥ 1 mL and R₁₀₀ < 1 mL, respectively, in the PI group (p = 0.0068), and 14.09% and 5.52% for R₁₀₀ ≥ 1 mL and R₁₀₀ < 1 mL, respectively, in the EBRT combination therapy group (p = 0.0070).

CONCLUSIONS

Rectal toxicity was relatively rare in this study compared with previous reports. For Japanese prostate cancer patients, R₁₀₀ < 1 mL in both PI and EBRT combination therapy groups and interactive planning in EBRT combination therapy group may be effective in decreasing the incidence of rectal toxicity.

Comparative study of late rectal toxicity in prostate cancer patients treated with low-dose-rate brachytherapy: With or without supplemental external beam radiotherapy

PURPOSE

Supplemental external beam radiation therapy (sEBRT) is often prescribed in men undergoing low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy. A population of patients was analyzed to assess the effect of sEBRT on late rectal toxicity. It was hypothesized that sEBRT + LDR would be associated with a higher risk of late rectal toxicity.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This retrospective cohort study examined LDR brachytherapy patients, treated with or without sEBRT, with a minimum of 5-year followup. Longitudinal assessments were evaluated using the computerized patient record system. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for analysis.

RESULTS

Median followup was 7.5 years for 245 patients from 2004 to 2007. sEBRT was administered to 33.5%. Followup beyond 5 years was available for 89%. Overall rates of Grade ≥2 and ≥3 rectal toxicities were 6.9% and 2.9%, respectively. The risk of Grade ≥2 rectal toxicity was 2.8-fold higher for patients receiving sEBRT (95% confidence interval: 1.1-7.2; p = 0.02). The risk of Grade ≥3 rectal toxicity was 11.9-fold higher for patients who received sEBRT (1.5-97.4, 95% confidence interval; p = 0.003). Six of seven patients with a Grade ≥3 rectal toxicity received sEBRT, including one who required an abdominoperineal resection. Median post-LDR D90, V150, V200, and R100 values were 103.3%, 59.4%, 30.1%, and 0.5 cc.

CONCLUSIONS

In a cohort of LDR brachytherapy patients with high rates of followup, sEBRT + LDR was associated with significantly higher risk of Grade ≥2 and ≥3 late rectal toxicity. This analysis supports previous findings and maintains concern about the supplemental use of external beam radiation therapy with LDR brachytherapy while its benefit for tumor control has yet to be prospectively validated.

Comparison of genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity among four radiotherapy modalities for prostate cancer: Conventional radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, and permanent iodine-125 implantation with or without external beam radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To compare late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity following different prostate cancer treatment modalities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included 1084 consecutive prostate cancer patients treated with conventional radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), permanent iodine-125 implantation (PI) alone, and PI combined with external beam radiotherapy (PI+EBRT). The effects of treatment- and patient-related factors on late grade ⩾ 2 (G2+) GU/GI toxicity risk were assessed.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 43 months (range, 12-97 months). Compared to the PI+EBRT, there was significantly less G2+ GU toxicity in the conventional radiotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.39; 95% CI, 0.20-0.77) and the IMRT (HR=0.45, 95% CI, 0.27-0.73). Compared to the PI+EBRT, there was significantly more G2+ GI toxicity in the IMRT (HR = 2.38; 95% CI, 1.16-4.87). In PI-related groups, prostate equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions was a significant predictor of G2+ GU toxicity (p = 0.001), and the rectal volume receiving more than 100% of the prescribed dose was a significant predictor of G2+ GI toxicity (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The differences in the late G2+ GU/GI risk cannot be explained by the differences in treatment modalities themselves, but by the total radiation dose to the GU/GI tract, which had a causal role in the development of late G2+ GU/GI toxicity across all treatment modality groups.

Rectal bleeding after radiation therapy for endometrial cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The goals of this study were to determine the rate and risk factors of rectal bleeding (RB) after external beam radiotherapy and vaginal brachytherapy (EBRT +VB), and to compare these data to previously unreported RB rates from PORTEC-2 patients receiving EBRT or VB alone.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective chart review identified 212 endometrial cancer patients receiving adjuvant EBRT+VB between 2006 and 2013. Patient-reported RB data were also obtained from PORTEC-2 patients randomized to EBRT (n=166) or VB (n=182). The two populations were compared using an RB scale of symptom severity.

RESULTS

After a median 35months, 17.9% of EBRT+VB patients (n=38) experienced any RB with 1.9% (n=4) having bleeding requiring intervention. Age ⩽70years was the only predictor of RB (OR 2.8; 95% CI 1.1-8.7; p=0.027). Rates of patient-reported RB after EBRT were similar with 15.0% (n=25) having any RB and 0.6% (n=1) having "very much" bleeding. On regression analysis, any EBRT (either EBRT alone or EBRT+VB) increased the risk of RB compared to those who received VB alone (OR 3.0; p=0.0028; 95% CI 1.4-6.7). The rates of more severe RB were low and did not significantly differ between treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant RB is rare after radiation. EBRT has higher rates of rectal bleeding than VB. The addition of VB to EBRT does not significantly alter bleeding rates.

Urinary and Rectal Toxicity Profiles After Permanent Iodine-125 Implant Brachytherapy in Japanese Men: Nationwide J-POPS Multi-institutional Prospective Cohort Study

PURPOSE

To assess, in a nationwide multi-institutional cohort study begun in 2005 and in which 6927 subjects were enrolled by 2010, the urinary and rectal toxicity profiles of subjects who enrolled during the first 2 years, and evaluate the toxicity profiles for permanent seed implantation (PI) and a combination therapy with PI and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Baseline data for 2339 subjects out of 2354 patients were available for the analyses. Toxicities were evaluated using the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, and the International Prostate Symptom Scores were recorded prospectively until 36 months after radiation therapy.

RESULTS

Grade 2+ acute urinary toxicities developed in 7.36% (172 of 2337) and grade 2+ acute rectal toxicities developed in 1.03% (24 of 2336) of the patients. Grade 2+ late urinary and rectal toxicities developed in 5.75% (133 of 2312) and 1.86% (43 of 2312) of the patients, respectively. A higher incidence of grade 2+ acute urinary toxicity occurred in the PI group than in the EBRT group (8.49% vs 3.66%; P<.01). Acute rectal toxicity outcomes were similar between the treatment groups. The 3-year cumulative incidence rates for grade 2+ late urinary toxicities were 6.04% versus 4.82% for the PI and the EBRT groups, respectively, with no significant differences between the treatment groups. The 3-year cumulative incidence rates for grade 2+ late rectal toxicities were 0.90% versus 5.01% (P<.01) for the PI and the EBRT groups, respectively. The mean of the postimplant International Prostate Symptom Score peaked at 3 months, but it decreased to a range that was within 2 points of the baseline score, which was observed in 1625 subjects (69.47%) at the 1-year follow-up assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

The acute urinary toxicities observed were acceptable given the frequency and retention, and the late rectal toxicities were more favorable than those of other studies.

A review of rectal toxicity following permanent low dose-rate prostate brachytherapy and the potential value of biodegradable rectal spacers

Permanent radioactive seed implantation provides highly effective treatment for prostate cancer that typically includes multidisciplinary collaboration between urologists and radiation oncologists. Low dose-rate (LDR) prostate brachytherapy offers excellent tumor control rates and has equivalent rates of rectal toxicity when compared with external beam radiotherapy. Owing to its proximity to the anterior rectal wall, a small portion of the rectum is often exposed to high doses of ionizing radiation from this procedure. Although rare, some patients develop transfusion-dependent rectal bleeding, ulcers or fistulas. These complications occasionally require permanent colostomy and thus can significantly impact a patient's quality of life. Aside from proper technique, a promising strategy has emerged that can help avoid these complications. By injecting biodegradable materials behind Denonviller's fascia, brachytherpists can increase the distance between the rectum and the radioactive sources to significantly decrease the rectal dose. This review summarizes the progress in this area and its applicability for use in combination with permanent LDR brachytherapy.

Novel parameter predicting grade 2 rectal bleeding after iodine-125 prostate brachytherapy combined with external beam radiation therapy

PURPOSE

To propose a novel parameter predicting rectal bleeding on the basis of generalized equivalent uniform doses (gEUD) after (125)I prostate brachytherapy combined with external beam radiation therapy and to assess the predictive value of this parameter.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

To account for differences among radiation treatment modalities and fractionation schedules, rectal dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of 369 patients with localized prostate cancer undergoing combined therapy retrieved from corresponding treatment planning systems were converted to equivalent dose-based DVHs. The gEUDs for the rectum were calculated from these converted DVHs. The total gEUD (gEUDsum) was determined by a summation of the brachytherapy and external-beam radiation therapy components.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients (10.3%) developed grade 2+ rectal bleeding. The grade 2+ rectal bleeding rate increased as the gEUDsum increased: 2.0% (2 of 102 patients) for <70 Gy, 10.3% (15 of 145 patients) for 70-80 Gy, 15.8% (12 of 76 patients) for 80-90 Gy, and 19.6% (9 of 46 patients) for >90 Gy (P=.002). Multivariate analysis identified age (P=.024) and gEUDsum (P=.000) as risk factors for grade 2+ rectal bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate gEUD to be a potential predictive factor for grade 2+ late rectal bleeding after combined therapy for prostate cancer.

Timing of postseed imaging influences rectal dose-volume parameters for cesium-131 prostate seed implants

PURPOSE

To study the influence of timing of postseed implant imaging on rectal dose-volume parameters for cesium-131 ((131)Cs) seed prostate implants.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Fifteen patients were treated in our institution with combination (131)Cs brachytherapy followed by pelvic external beam radiation therapy for intermediate to high-risk prostate cancers. For all patients, CT scans were scheduled at 7 days (CT(7)) and again at 2 months for external beam radiation therapy simulation purpose (CT(60)) postseed implantation. Comprehensive postseed implant dosimetry was performed for both CT(7) and CT(60) scans. In each case, dose-volume histogram parameters, rectal separation (the distance between the center of posterior most seed and most anterior rectal wall), and posterior row activity (the total activity implanted within 2-4mm anterior to the posterior wall of the prostate) data were collected. The absolute rectal volumes receiving 100% and 110% prescription dose were also collected.

RESULTS

Rectal dose correlated strongly with rectal separation (p<0.001). The mean change in rectal separation between CT(7) and CT(60) scans was 1.1 (±1.7) mm, and the corresponding change in 0.1-cc rectal dose was 18 (±26.5) Gy. Posterior row activity did not correlate with rectal dose (p=0.51). The mean volume of rectum that receives between 100% and 110% of the prescription dose (RV(100) and RV(110)) increased twofold, between CT(7) and CT(60) evaluations (0.03 [±0.06] cc vs. 0.07 (±0.05) cc, respectively, p=0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study has demonstrated that rectal doses after (131)Cs seed implants are influenced by the timing of postseed imaging. This may be a consequence of prostatic and periprostatic edema resolution.