1
|
Yue J, Wang J, Chen W, Yin X, Du H, Wei Y. Palliative surgery versus non-surgery of the solitary metastatic lesion in De novo metastatic breast cancer: A SEER based study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2024; 103:e38651. [PMID: 38905366 PMCID: PMC11191955 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000038651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2024] [Indexed: 06/23/2024] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate whether palliative surgery for metastatic lesion could provide a survival benefit in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients with solitary metastasis. De novo MBC patients with solitary distant lesions were enrolled utilizing the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to form matched pairs of the surgery group and the non-surgery group. The breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes between the 2 groups were compared in the following 3 sample models: the entire cohort of MBC (7665 cases); subgroups of patients with different isolated metastatic organs; and subgroups of patients with different molecular subtypes for each isolated metastatic organ. Compared with the Non-surgery group, the surgery group showed better BCSS and OS before PSM (HR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.79-0.99, P = .04 and HR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.76-0.95, P = .006, respectively). After PSM, palliative surgery still provided an OS benefit in patients with brain metastasis and lung metastasis (HR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.37-0.95, P = .01 and HR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.45-0.90, P = .02, respectively). Likewise, a better BCSS benefit was also found in the subset of patients with brain metastasis (HR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.38-1.00, P = .01). Further stratification analysis indicated that patients with the luminal A subtype with brain metastasis have a better BCSS (HR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.16-0.79, P = .04) and OS (HR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.18-0.75, P = .03) after undergoing palliative surgery than nonsurgical treatment. Our study originality showed that palliative surgery for metastatic lesion could improve survival prognosis in patients with special single-organ metastasis and specific molecular subtypes. More clinical studies are needed to determine whether palliative surgery should be performed in MBC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian Yue
- Chongqing Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology and Epigenetics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
- Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
- Department of Breast Surgery, Gaozhou People’s Hospital, Gaozhou, China
| | - Jing Wang
- Department of Head, Neck and Breast Surgery, Anhui Provincial Cancer Hospital, Hefei, China
- Department of Head, Neck and Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Wei Chen
- Youyang Hospital, A Branch of The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Youyang, China
| | - Xuedong Yin
- Chongqing Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology and Epigenetics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
- Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Huimin Du
- Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Yuxian Wei
- Chongqing Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology and Epigenetics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
- Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Matsuda R, Maeoka R, Morimoto T, Nakazawa T, Morisaki Y, Nakase K, Yokoyama S, Kotsugi M, Takeshima Y, Yamada S, Nakagawa I. Preoperative Blood Counts Predict Overall Survival in Patients Undergoing Surgical Removal of Brain Metastasis. World Neurosurg 2024; 186:e727-e733. [PMID: 38636630 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.04.054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2024] [Revised: 04/09/2024] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The prognosis for patients with cancer with brain metastasis (BM) requiring surgical removal is quite limited. Preoperative prognostic factors can provide meaningful information to surgeons, oncologists, and patients. This study evaluated the preoperative blood counts in patients with BM who were treated with surgical removal. METHODS Between January 2011 and November 2021, 221 consecutive surgeries were conducted on 198 patients with BM. Among the 198 patients, 188 patients with sufficient blood test data and follow-up were analyzed in this study. The tumors originated from the lungs (n = 102, 54.3%), colon (n = 26, 13.3%), breast (n = 13, 6.9%), kidney (n = 8, 4.3%), stomach (n = 6, 3.2%), and others (n = 33, 17.6%). The blood test data included neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils, basophils, red blood cell count, hemoglobin, and albumin. RESULTS The median follow-up and median survival times were both 11 months (range: 0-139 months). Higher neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio ≥ 3.17, platelet-lymphocyte ratio ≥112.7, systemic immune-inflammation index ≥594.4, systemic inflammation response index ≥1.25 were unfavorable predictors of prognosis for the patients treated with surgical removal for BM (P < 0.001). Furthermore, lower lymphocyte-monocyte ratio < 2.33 and prognostic nutritional index < 48.5 were unfavorable predictors. CONCLUSIONS Simple, less expensive, routinely ordered preoperative blood count assessments, such as the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-lymphocyte ratio, lymphocyte-monocyte ratio, systemic immune-inflammation index, systemic inflammation response index, and prognostic nutritional index, can predict the overall survival of patients treated with surgical removal for BM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryosuke Matsuda
- Department of Neurosurgery, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan.
| | - Ryosuke Maeoka
- Department of Neurosurgery, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan
| | - Takayuki Morimoto
- Department of Neurosurgery, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan
| | - Tsutomu Nakazawa
- Department of Neurosurgery, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan
| | - Yudai Morisaki
- Department of Neurosurgery, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan
| | - Kenta Nakase
- Department of Neurosurgery, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan
| | - Shohei Yokoyama
- Department of Neurosurgery, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan
| | - Masashi Kotsugi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan
| | | | - Shuichi Yamada
- Department of Neurosurgery, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan
| | - Ichiro Nakagawa
- Department of Neurosurgery, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bhogal T, Giannoudis A, Sokol E, Ali S, Palmieri C. Analysis of Breast Cancer Brain Metastases Reveals an Enrichment of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 12 Structural Rearrangements in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Disease. JCO Precis Oncol 2024; 8:e2300639. [PMID: 38838276 DOI: 10.1200/po.23.00639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2023] [Revised: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Genomic alterations have been identified in patients with breast cancer brain metastases (BCBMs), but large structural rearrangements have not been extensively studied. MATERIALS AND METHODS We analyzed the genomic profiles of 822 BCBMs and compared them with 11,988 local, breast-biopsied breast cancers (BCs) and 15,516 non-CNS metastases (Non-CNS M) derived from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded material using targeted capture sequencing. RESULTS Nine genes with structural rearrangements were more prevalent within BCBMs as compared with local BCs and Non-CNS M (adjusted-P < .05) and displayed a prevalence of >0.5%. The most common rearrangements within BCBMs involves cyclin-dependent kinase 12 (CDK12; 3.53%) as compared with the local BC (0.86%; adjusted-P = 7.1 × 10-8) and Non-CNS M specimens (0.68%; adjusted-P = 3.7 × 10-10). CDK12 rearrangements had a significantly higher frequency within human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive BCBMs (14.59%) compared with HER2-positive BCs (7.80%; P = 4.6 × 10-3) and HER2-positive Non-CNS M (7.87%; P = 4.8 × 10-3). CONCLUSION The most common structural rearrangements involve CDK12 with the higher prevalence in HER2-positive BCBMs. These data support more detailed investigation of the role and importance of CDK12 rearrangements in BCBMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Talvinder Bhogal
- Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Athina Giannoudis
- Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Ethan Sokol
- Computational Discovery, Foundation Medicine, Inc, Cambridge, MA
| | - Simak Ali
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
| | - Carlo Palmieri
- Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Avila J, Leone J, Vallejo CT, Lin NU, Leone JP. Survival analysis of patients with brain metastases at initial breast cancer diagnosis over the last decade. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2024; 205:579-587. [PMID: 38453783 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-024-07290-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE There have been significant advances in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (BC) over the past years, and long-term outcomes after a diagnosis of brain metastases are lacking. We aimed to identify predictors of brain metastases at initial breast cancer diagnosis, describe overall survival (OS) in the past decade, and identify factors associated with OS after brain metastases diagnosis. METHODS We evaluated patients with de novo stage IV BC using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database from 2010 to 2019. Multivariate logistic regression was conducted to assess predictors of brain metastases at initial breast cancer diagnosis. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log rank test was used to compare differences between groups. Cox regression was used to assess associations between several variables and OS. RESULTS 1,939 patients with brain metastases at initial breast cancer diagnosis were included. Factors associated with this presentation were grade III/IV tumors, ductal histology, hormone receptor (HR)-negative/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive subtype, and extracranial metastases. Patients with HR-positive/HER2-positive disease had the longest OS (median 18 months) and 12.2% were alive at 8 years. Factors associated with shorter OS included older age, lower income, triple-negative subtype, higher grade, and visceral metastases. CONCLUSION Over the last decade, the median OS of patients with brain metastases at initial breast cancer diagnosis remained poor; however, a substantial minority survive 5 or more years, with rates higher in patients with HER2-positive tumors. In addition to tumor subtype, OS varied according to age, extracranial metastases, and sociodemographic factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge Avila
- Department of Medicine, St Elizabeth's Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Julieta Leone
- Grupo Oncológico Cooperativo Del Sur (GOCS), Neuquén, Argentina
| | | | - Nancy U Lin
- Medical Oncology, Susan F. Smith Center for Women's Cancer, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - José P Leone
- Medical Oncology, Susan F. Smith Center for Women's Cancer, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fittall MW, Brewer M, de Boisanger J, Kviat L, Babiker A, Taylor H, Saran F, Konadu J, Solda F, Creak A, Welsh LC, Rosenfelder N. Predicting Survival with Brain Metastases in the Stereotactic Radiosurgery Era: are Existing Prognostic Scores Still Relevant? Or Can we do Better? Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2024; 36:307-317. [PMID: 38368229 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2024.01.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Revised: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/19/2024]
Abstract
Predicting survival is essential to tailoring treatment for patients diagnosed with brain metastases. We have evaluated the performance of widely used, validated prognostic scoring systems (Graded Prognostic Assessment and diagnosis-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment) in over 1000 'real-world' patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery to the brain, selected according to National Health Service commissioning criteria. Survival outcomes from our dataset were consistent with those predicted by the prognostic systems, but with certain cancer subtypes showing a significantly better survival than predicted. Although performance status remains the simplest tool for prediction, total brain tumour volume emerges as an independent prognostic factor, and a new, improved, prognostic scoring system incorporating this has been developed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M W Fittall
- Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - M Brewer
- The Department of Neuro-oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - J de Boisanger
- The Department of Neuro-oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - L Kviat
- The Department of Neuro-oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - A Babiker
- The Department of Neuro-oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - H Taylor
- The Department of Neuro-oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - F Saran
- Cancer and Blood Service, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - J Konadu
- The Department of Neuro-oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - F Solda
- The Department of Neuro-oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - A Creak
- The Department of Neuro-oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - L C Welsh
- The Department of Neuro-oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - N Rosenfelder
- The Department of Neuro-oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hügel M, Stöhr J, Kuhnt T, Nägler F, Papsdorf K, Klagges S, Hambsch P, Güresir E, Nicolay NH, Seidel C. Long-term survival in patients with brain metastases-clinical characterization of a rare scenario. Strahlenther Onkol 2024; 200:335-345. [PMID: 37646818 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-023-02123-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to assess clinical, treatment, and prognostic features in patients with brain metastases (BM) from solid tumors achieving long-term survival (LTS). Further, the accuracy of diagnosis-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment scores (ds-GPA) to predict LTS was evaluated. METHODS Patients admitted for radiotherapy of BM between 2010 and 2020 at a large tertiary cancer center with survival of at least 3 years from diagnosis of BM were included. Patient, tumor, treatment characteristics and ds-GPA were compiled retrospectively. RESULTS From a total of 1248 patients with BM, 61 (4.9%) survived ≥ 3 years. In 40 patients, detailed patient charts were available. Among LTS patients, median survival time from diagnosis of BM was 51.5 months. Most frequent primary tumors were lung cancer (45%), melanoma (20%), and breast cancer (17.5%). At the time of diagnosis of BM, 11/40 patients (27.5%) had oligometastatic disease. Estimated mean survival time based on ds-GPA was 19.7 months (in 8 cases estimated survival < 12 months). Resection followed by focal or whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) was often applied (60%), followed by primary stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) (20%) or WBRT (20%). 80% of patients received systemic treatment, appearing particularly active in specifically altered non-small lung cancer (NSCLC), melanoma, and HER2-positive breast cancer. Karnofsky performance score (KPS) and the presence of oligometastatic disease at BM diagnosis were persisting prognostic factors in LTS patients. CONCLUSION In this monocentric setting reflecting daily pattern of care, LTS with BM is heterogeneous and difficult to predict. Effective local treatment and modern systemic therapies often appear crucial for LTS. The impact of concomitant diseases and frailty is not clear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Hügel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - J Stöhr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - T Kuhnt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - F Nägler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - K Papsdorf
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - S Klagges
- Clinical Cancer Registry, Leipzig, Germany
| | - P Hambsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - E Güresir
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - N H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - C Seidel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ottaviani MM, Fasinella MR, Di Rienzo A, Gladi M, di Somma LGM, Iacoangeli M, Dobran M. Analysis of prognostic factors and the role of epilepsy in neurosurgical patients with brain metastases. Surg Neurol Int 2024; 15:79. [PMID: 38628515 PMCID: PMC11021078 DOI: 10.25259/sni_735_2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Brain metastases (BMs) represent the most frequent brain tumors in adults. The identification of key prognostic factors is essential for choosing the therapeutic strategy tailored to each patient. Epilepsy can precede several months of other clinical presentations of BMs. This work aimed to study the impact of epilepsy and other prognostic factors on BMs patients' survival. Methods This retrospective study included 51 patients diagnosed with BMs and who underwent neurosurgery between 2010 and 2021. The impact of BM features and patient's clinical characteristics on the overall survival (OS) was analyzed through uni- and multivariate analysis. Results The average OS was 25.98 months and differed according to the histology of the primary tumor. The primary tumor localization and the presence of extracranial metastases had a statistically significant impact on the OS, and patients with single BM showed a superior OS to those with multifocal lesions. The localization of BMs in the temporal lobe correlated with the highest OS. The OS was significantly higher in patients who presented seizures in their clinical onset and in those who had better post-surgical Karnofsky performance status, no post-surgical complications, and who underwent post-surgical treatment. Conclusion Our study has highlighted prognostically favorable patient and tumor factors. Among those, a clinical onset with epileptic seizures can help identify brain metastasis hitherto silent. This could lead to immediate diagnostic-therapeutic interventions with more aggressive therapies after appropriate multidisciplinary evaluation.
Collapse
|
8
|
Cacho-Díaz B, Tripathy D, Arrieta VA, Escamilla-Ramirez A, Alvarado-Miranda A, Rodríguez-Mayoral O. Real-World Experience in Hispanic Patients With Breast Cancer and Brain Metastases Using Different Prognostic Tools. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024:S0360-3016(24)00305-5. [PMID: 38364945 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.01.222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Revised: 12/29/2023] [Accepted: 01/28/2024] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Only a small percentage of Hispanic patients have been included in studies that developed prognostic models for breast cancer and brain metastases. Therefore, there is a clear need for tools tailored to this demographic. This study assesses the efficacy of common prognostic tools in a Hispanic population. METHODS AND MATERIALS We retrospectively analyzed a data set of Hispanic patients with breast cancer and newly diagnosed brain metastases from 2009 to 2023 at a single referral center. For each prognostic tool, Kaplan-Meier curves were built. The performances of the models were compared using the area under the curve (AUC), C-statistic, and Akaike information criteria (AIC). RESULTS Of 492 patients, the median time from breast cancer to brain metastasis diagnosis was 22.7 months (IQR, 12.1-53.3). The median overall survival was 11.6 months (95% CI, 9.9-13.4). All models were validated as prognostic tools (P < .001). The model with the better performance was the breast graded prognostic assessment (GPA; AIC, 402; AUC, 0.65), followed by the modified GPA (AIC, 406; AUC, 0.64), the disease-specific GPA (AIC, 407; AUC, 0.62), recursive partitioning analysis (AIC, 421; AUC, 0.62), and GPA (AIC, 422; AUC, 0.60). CONCLUSIONS The breast GPA demonstrated superior accuracy in prognosticating outcomes for Hispanic patients with breast cancer and brain metastases. This underscores the critical importance of incorporating racial and ethnic diversity in creating and validating medical prognostic tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernardo Cacho-Díaz
- Neuro-Oncology Unit, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Mexico City, Mexico.
| | - Debu Tripathy
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Victor A Arrieta
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Xu H, Wang Y, Li L, Han Y, Wu Y, Sa Q, Xu B, Wang J. New insights into HER2-low breast cancer brain metastasis: A retrospective analysis. Breast 2024; 73:103669. [PMID: 38176304 PMCID: PMC10791565 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.103669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Revised: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A considerable number of patients with breast cancer will suffer from brain metastasis in the advanced setting. The HER2 status serves as a significant prognostic factor and the reference of applying treatment for patients with breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM). METHODS Between January 2010 and July 2021, patients with BCBM who had available HER2 status were identified. The patients with HER2 1+ in immunohistochemistry (IHC) or IHC 2+ and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) negative were categorized as HER2-low. Comparisons were conducted between the HER2-low and HER2-zero population. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) after the diagnosis of BCBM. Survival outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS In this study, we analyzed 71 patients with the HER2-low breast cancer subtype and 64 patients with the HER2-zero subtype. Despite the limited sample size, our findings revealed a significantly better OS for patients with HER2-low cancer compared to their HER2-zero counterparts (26 m vs 20 m, p = 0.0017). This trend was particularly notable in the HR-negative group (26 m vs 13 m, p = 0.0078), whereas no significant difference was observed among the HR-positive patients. Furthermore, Cox regression analysis revealed that the HER2-low status was an independent prognostic factor for better survival in the HR-negative patients (p = 0.046 in multivariate analysis). CONCLUSIONS Patients diagnosed with HER2-low BCBM exhibited a more favorable prognosis than those with HER2-zero BCBM, particularly within the HR-negative subgroup. The low expression of HER2 is supposed to be linked to the prolonged survival of BCBM patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hangcheng Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17, Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Yan Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17, Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Li Li
- Department of Medical Records, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17, Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Yiqun Han
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17, Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Yun Wu
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17, Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Qiang Sa
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17, Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Binghe Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17, Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China.
| | - Jiayu Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17, Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Goldberg M, Mondragon-Soto MG, Dieringer L, Altawalbeh G, Pöser P, Baumgart L, Wiestler B, Gempt J, Meyer B, Aftahy AK. Navigating Post-Operative Outcomes: A Comprehensive Reframing of an Original Graded Prognostic Assessment in Patients with Brain Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:291. [PMID: 38254781 PMCID: PMC10813622 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16020291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Revised: 12/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) has been proposed for various brain metastases (BMs) tailored to the primary histology and molecular profiles. However, it does not consider whether patients have been operated on or not and does not include surgical outcomes as prognostic factors. The residual tumor burden (RTB) is a strong predictor of overall survival. We validated the GPA score and introduced "volumetric GPA" in the largest cohort of operated patients and further explored the role of RTB as an additional prognostic factor. METHODS A total of 630 patients with BMs between 2007 and 2020 were included. The four GPA components were analyzed. The validity of the original score was assessed using Cox regression, and a modified index incorporating RTB was developed by comparing the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and AUC parameters. RESULTS GPA categories showed an association with survival: age (p < 0.001, hazard ratio (HR) 2.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.5-3.3), Karnofsky performance status (KPS) (p < 0.001, HR 1.3, 95% CI 1.2-1.5), number of BMs (p = 0.019, HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.8), and the presence of extracranial manifestation (p < 0.001, HR 3, 95% CI 1.6-2.5). The median survival for GPA 0-1 was 4 months; for GPA 1.5-2, it was 12 months; for GPA 2.5-3, it was 21 months; and for GPA 3.5-4, it was 38 months (p < 0.001). RTB was identified as an independent prognostic factor. A cut-off of 2 cm3 was used for further analysis, which showed a median survival of 6 months (95% CI 4-8) vs. 13 months (95% CI 11-14, p < 0.001) for patients with RTB > 2 cm3 and <2 cm3, respectively. RTB was added as an additional component for a modified volumetric GPA score. The survival rates with the modified GPA score were: GPA 0-1: 4 months, GPA 1.5-2: 7 months, GPA 2.5-3: 18 months, and GPA 3.5-4: 34 months. Both scores showed good stratification, with the new score showed a trend towards better discrimination in patients with more favorable prognoses. CONCLUSION The prognostic value of the original GPA was confirmed in our cohort of patients who underwent surgery for BM. The RTB was identified as a parameter of high prognostic significance and was incorporated into an updated "volumetric GPA". This score provides a novel tool for prognosis and clinical decision making in patients undergoing surgery. This method may be useful for stratification and patient selection for further treatment and in future clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Goldberg
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany; (L.D.); (G.A.); (B.M.); (A.K.A.)
| | - Michel G. Mondragon-Soto
- Department of Neurosurgery, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Mexico City 14269, Mexico;
| | - Laura Dieringer
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany; (L.D.); (G.A.); (B.M.); (A.K.A.)
| | - Ghaith Altawalbeh
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany; (L.D.); (G.A.); (B.M.); (A.K.A.)
| | - Paul Pöser
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charite–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Lea Baumgart
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Benedikt Wiestler
- Department of Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany;
| | - Jens Gempt
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Bernhard Meyer
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany; (L.D.); (G.A.); (B.M.); (A.K.A.)
| | - Amir Kaywan Aftahy
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany; (L.D.); (G.A.); (B.M.); (A.K.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cuthbert H, Riley M, Bhatt S, Au-Yeung CK, Arshad A, Eladawi S, Zisakis A, Tsermoulas G, Watts C, Wykes V. Utility of a prognostic assessment tool to predict survival following surgery for brain metastases. Neurooncol Pract 2023; 10:586-591. [PMID: 38026583 PMCID: PMC10666803 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npad047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Brain metastases account for more than 50% of all intracranial tumors and are associated with poor outcomes. Treatment decisions in this highly heterogenous cohort remain controversial due to the myriad of treatment options available, and there is no clearly defined standard of care. The prognosis in brain metastasis patients varies widely with tumor type, extracranial disease burden and patient performance status. Decision-making regarding treatment is, therefore, tailored to each patient and their disease. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study assessing survival outcomes following surgery for brain metastases over a 50-month period (April 1, 2014-June 30, 2018). We compared predicted survival using the diagnosis-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (ds-GPA) with actual survival. Results A total of 186 patients were included in our cohort. Regression analysis demonstrated no significant correlation between actual and predicted outcome. The most common reason for exclusion was insufficient information being available to the neuro-oncology multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting to allow GPA calculation. Conclusions In this study, we demonstrate that "predicted survival" using the ds-GPA does not correlate with "actual survival" in our operated patient cohort. We also identify a shortcoming in the amount of information available at MDT in order to implement the GPA appropriately. Patient selection for aggressive therapies is crucial, and this study emphasizes the need for treatment decisions to be individualized based on patient and cancer clinical characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hadleigh Cuthbert
- Department of Neurosurgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham, UK
| | - Max Riley
- University of Birmingham Medical School, Birmingham, UK
| | - Shreya Bhatt
- University of Birmingham Medical School, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Ayesha Arshad
- Department of Neurosurgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham, UK
| | - Sondos Eladawi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham, UK
| | - Athanasios Zisakis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham, UK
| | - Georgios Tsermoulas
- Department of Neurosurgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham, UK
| | - Colin Watts
- Department of Neurosurgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Victoria Wykes
- Department of Neurosurgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Puri S, Chaudhry A, Bayable A, Ganesh A, Daher A, Gadi VK, Maraka S. Systemic Treatment for Brain Metastasis and Leptomeningeal Disease in Breast Cancer Patients. Curr Oncol Rep 2023; 25:1419-1430. [PMID: 37924439 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-023-01468-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Breast cancer with brain metastasis (BCBM) and leptomeningeal disease (LMD) are important clinical problems. Traditionally, patients with metastases to the brain and meninges were excluded from clinical trials; hence, robust, evidence-based treatment recommendations are lacking. In this review, we outline the systemic treatment options and ongoing clinical trials. RECENT FINDINGS Several recent studies have added to the systemic treatment options available. Antibody-drug conjugates have changed the therapeutic landscape. Combination treatment modalities that target multiple mechanisms including disruption of the blood brain barrier are increasingly being studied. Breast cancer with brain metastases and LMD is a heterogenous disease. While the prognosis remains grim, with more systemic treatment options, patients with BCBM are now living longer. Many ongoing clinical trials hold promise to further improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sushant Puri
- Neurooncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Amina Chaudhry
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Asnakech Bayable
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ashwin Ganesh
- Department of Neurology& Rehabilitation, University of Illinois at Chicago, 912 South Wood Street 174N m/c, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Ahmad Daher
- Department of Neurology& Rehabilitation, University of Illinois at Chicago, 912 South Wood Street 174N m/c, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
- Translational Oncology Program, University of Illinois Cancer Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Vijayakrishna K Gadi
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Translational Oncology Program, University of Illinois Cancer Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Stefania Maraka
- Department of Neurology& Rehabilitation, University of Illinois at Chicago, 912 South Wood Street 174N m/c, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Passalacqua MI, Ciappina G, Di Pietro M, Spagnolo CC, Squeri A, Granata B, Muscolino P, Santarpia M. Therapeutic strategies for HER2-positive breast cancer with central nervous system involvement: a literature review and future perspectives. Transl Cancer Res 2023; 12:3179-3197. [PMID: 38130295 PMCID: PMC10731379 DOI: 10.21037/tcr-23-1126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
Background and Objective Brain metastases (BMs) are present in approximately 55% of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer (HER2+ BC). The introduction of anti-HER2 agents has radically changed the prognosis of these patients by prolonging overall survival. Methods In this review, we describe the biology of central nervous system (CNS) spreading in patients with HER2+ BC. We also provide a literature review of current treatment strategies of brain metastatic BC, focusing on HER2+ disease, and future perspectives. Key Content and Findings Treatment of symptomatic BMs includes traditionally neurosurgery and/or radiotherapy, depending on the number of metastases, performance status and systemic disease control. Local treatments, such as surgical excision of BM and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), when feasible, are preferred over whole-brain radiotherapy, because of related cognitive impairment. These treatments can lead to a local control of the disease, however, systemic relapses can affect the prognosis of these patients. Recently, new anti-HER2 agents have demonstrated to be effective on BMs, thereby leading to improved survival outcomes with an acceptable quality of life. Despite the clinical benefit of these approaches, BMs still represent a cause of death and effective therapeutic strategies are needed. Conclusions Different targeted agents have demonstrated significant efficacy with tolerable safety profiles in HER2+ BC patients with BM, and have already been approved for clinical use in this setting. A better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the onset of BMs could suggest novel targeted approaches in order to prevent CNS localization or delay progression to CNS in HER-2 metastatic patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Martina Di Pietro
- Department of Human Pathology “G. Barresi”, Medical Oncology Unit, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Calogera Claudia Spagnolo
- Department of Human Pathology “G. Barresi”, Medical Oncology Unit, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Andrea Squeri
- Department of Human Pathology “G. Barresi”, Medical Oncology Unit, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Barbara Granata
- Department of Human Pathology “G. Barresi”, Medical Oncology Unit, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Paola Muscolino
- Department of Human Pathology “G. Barresi”, Medical Oncology Unit, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Burney IA, Aal Hamad AH, Hashmi SFA, Ahmad N, Pervez N. Evolution of the Management of Brain Metastases: A Bibliometric Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5570. [PMID: 38067273 PMCID: PMC10705608 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15235570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/04/2024] Open
Abstract
A systematic review of the published literature was conducted to analyze the management evolution of brain metastases from different cancers. Using the keywords "brain metastasis", "brain metastases", "CNS metastasis", "CNS metastases", "phase III" AND/OR "Randomized Controlled Trial" (RCT), relevant articles were searched for on the SCOPUS database. A total of 1986 articles were retrieved, published over a 45-year period (1977-2022). Relevant articles were defined as clinical studies describing the treatment or prevention of brain metastases from any cancer. Articles on imaging, quality of life, cognitive impairment after treatment, or primary brain tumors were excluded. After a secondary analysis, reviewing the abstracts and/or full texts, 724 articles were found to be relevant. Publications significantly increased in the last 10 years. A total of 252 articles (34.8%) were published in 12 core journals, receiving 50% of the citations. The number of publications in Frontiers in Oncology, BMC Cancer, and Radiotherapy and Oncology have increased considerably over the last few years. There were 111 randomized controlled trials, 128 review articles, and 63 meta-analyses. Most randomized trials reported on brain metastases management from unselected tumors (49), lung cancer (47), or breast cancer (11). In the last 5 years (2017 to 2022), management of brain metastasis has moved on from WBRT, the use of chemotherapy, and radio-sensitization to three directions. First, Radiosurgery or Radiotherapy (SRS/SRT), or hippocampal-sparing WBRT is employed to reduce radiation toxicity. Second, it has moved to the use of novel agents, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and third, to the use of molecularly directed therapy such as TKIs, in asymptomatic low volume metastasis, obviating the need for WBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ikram A. Burney
- Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Care and Research Center, Muscat 123, Oman; (I.A.B.); (S.F.A.H.)
- Panjwani Center for Molecular Medicine & Drug Research, International Center of Chemical and Biological Sciences, Karachi University, Karachi 75270, Pakistan
| | | | - Syed F. A. Hashmi
- Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Care and Research Center, Muscat 123, Oman; (I.A.B.); (S.F.A.H.)
| | - Nisar Ahmad
- Department of Economics and Finance, College of Economics and Political Science, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat 123, Oman;
| | - Nadeem Pervez
- Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Care and Research Center, Muscat 123, Oman; (I.A.B.); (S.F.A.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Niikura N, Yamanaka T, Nomura H, Shiraishi K, Kusama H, Yamamoto M, Matsuura K, Inoue K, Takahara S, Kita S, Yamaguchi M, Aruga T, Shibata N, Shimomura A, Ozaki Y, Sakai S, Kiga Y, Izutani T, Shiosakai K, Tsurutani J. Treatment with trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer and brain metastases and/or leptomeningeal disease (ROSET-BM). NPJ Breast Cancer 2023; 9:82. [PMID: 37821514 PMCID: PMC10567705 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-023-00584-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Therapeutic options for breast cancer patients with brain metastases (BM)/leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LMC) are limited. Here, we report on the effectiveness and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer patients with BM. Data were analyzed for 104 patients administered T-DXd. Overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), intracranial (IC)-ORR, and IC-PFS were evaluated. ORR by investigator assessment was 55.7% (total population). Median PFS was 16.1 months; 12-month OS rate was 74.9% (total population). Median time-to-treatment failure was 9.7 months. In 51 patients with BM imaging, IC-ORR and median IC-PFS by independent central review were 62.7% and 16.1 months, respectively. In 19 LMC patients, 12-month PFS and OS rates were 60.7% and 87.1%, respectively. T-DXd showed effectiveness regarding IC-ORR, IC-PFS, PFS, and OS in breast cancer patients with BM/active BM, and sustained systemic and central nervous system disease control in LMC patients.Trial Registration: UMIN000044995.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naoki Niikura
- Department of Breast Oncology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.
| | - Takashi Yamanaka
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Hironori Nomura
- First Department of Surgery, University of the Ryukyus, School of Medicine, Okinawa, Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Shiraishi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Nagoya Medical Center, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Hiroki Kusama
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Mitsugu Yamamoto
- Department of Breast Surgery, Hokkaido Cancer Center, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Kazuo Matsuura
- Department of Breast Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Kenichi Inoue
- Division of Breast Oncology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan
| | | | - Shosuke Kita
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Miki Yamaguchi
- Department of Breast Surgery, JCHO Kurume General Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Tomoyuki Aruga
- Department of Breast Surgery, Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Nobuhiro Shibata
- Cancer Treatment Center, Kansai Medical University Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Akihiko Shimomura
- Department of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuri Ozaki
- Department of Breast Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Shuji Sakai
- Department of Imaging Diagnosis and Nuclear Medicine, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoko Kiga
- Oncology Medical Science Department, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tadahiro Izutani
- Oncology Medical Science Department, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Junji Tsurutani
- Advanced Cancer Translational Research Institute, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Wu Q, Sun MS, Liu YH, Ye JM, Xu L. Development and external validation of a prediction model for brain metastases in patients with metastatic breast cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:12333-12353. [PMID: 37432458 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-05125-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer patients with brain metastasis (BM) have a poor prognosis. This study aims to identify the risk factors of BM in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and establish a competing risk model for predicting the risk of brain metastases at different time points along the course of disease. METHODS Patients with MBC admitted to the breast disease center of Peking University First Hospital from 2008 to 2019 were selected and retrospectively analyzed to establish a risk prediction model for brain metastases. Patients with MBC admitted to eight breast disease centers from 2015 to 2017 were selected for external validation of the competing risk model. The competing risk approach was used to estimate cumulative incidence. Univariate Fine-Gray competing risk regression, optimal subset regression, and LASSO Cox regression were used to screen potential predictors of brain metastases. Based on the results, a competing risk model for predicting brain metastases was established. The discrimination of the model was evaluated using AUC, Brier score, and C-index. The calibration was evaluated by the calibration curves. The model was assessed for clinical utility by decision curve analysis (DCA), as well as by comparing the cumulative incidence of brain metastases between groups with different predicted risks. RESULTS From 2008 to 2019, a total of 327 patients with MBC in the breast disease center of Peking University First Hospital were admitted into the training set for this study. Among them, 74 (22.6%) patients developed brain metastases. From 2015 to 2017, a total of 160 patients with MBC in eight breast disease centers were admitted into the validation set for this study. Among them, 26 (16.3%) patients developed brain metastases. BMI, age, histological type, breast cancer subtype, and extracranial metastasis pattern were included in the final competing risk model for BM. The C-index of the prediction model in the validation set was 0.695, and the AUCs for predicting the risk of brain metastases within 1, 3, and 5 years were 0.674, 0.670, and 0.729, respectively. Time-dependent DCA curves demonstrated a net benefit of the prediction model with thresholds of 9-26% and 13-40% when predicting the risk of brain metastases at 1 and 3 years, respectively. Significant differences were observed in the cumulative incidence of brain metastases between groups with different predicted risks (P < 0.05 by Gray's test). CONCLUSIONS In this study, a competing risk model for BM was innovatively established, with the multicenter data being used as an independent external validation set to confirm the predictive efficiency and universality of the model. The C-index, calibration curves, and DCA of the prediction model indicated good discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility, respectively. Considering the high risk of death in patients with metastatic breast cancer, the competing risk model of this study is more accurate in predicting the risk of brain metastases compared with the traditional Logistic and Cox regression models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian Wu
- Breast Disease Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Ming-Shuai Sun
- Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100144, China
| | - Yin-Hua Liu
- Breast Disease Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Jing-Ming Ye
- Breast Disease Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Ling Xu
- Breast Disease Center, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, 100034, China.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Levis M, Gastino A, De Giorgi G, Mantovani C, Bironzo P, Mangherini L, Ricci AA, Ricardi U, Cassoni P, Bertero L. Modern Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases from Lung Cancer: Current Trends and Future Perspectives Based on Integrated Translational Approaches. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4622. [PMID: 37760591 PMCID: PMC10526239 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Revised: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Brain metastases (BMs) represent the most frequent metastatic event in the course of lung cancer patients, occurring in approximately 50% of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and in up to 70% in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Thus far, many advances have been made in the diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, allowing improvements in the prognosis of these patients. The modern approach relies on the integration of several factors, such as accurate histological and molecular profiling, comprehensive assessment of clinical parameters and precise definition of the extent of intracranial and extracranial disease involvement. The combination of these factors is pivotal to guide the multidisciplinary discussion and to offer the most appropriate treatment to these patients based on a personalized approach. Focal radiotherapy (RT), in all its modalities (radiosurgery (SRS), fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), adjuvant stereotactic radiotherapy (aSRT)), is the cornerstone of BM management, either alone or in combination with surgery and systemic therapies. We review the modern therapeutic strategies available to treat lung cancer patients with brain involvement. This includes an accurate review of the different technical solutions which can be exploited to provide a "state-of-art" focal RT and also a detailed description of the systemic agents available as effective alternatives to SRS/SRT when a targetable molecular driver is present. In addition to the validated treatment options, we also discuss the future perspective for focal RT, based on emerging clinical reports (e.g., SRS for patients with many BMs from NSCLC or SRS for BMs from SCLC), together with a presentation of innovative and promising findings in translational research and the combination of novel targeted agents with SRS/SRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Levis
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (M.L.); (A.G.); (G.D.G.); (C.M.); (U.R.)
| | - Alessio Gastino
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (M.L.); (A.G.); (G.D.G.); (C.M.); (U.R.)
| | - Greta De Giorgi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (M.L.); (A.G.); (G.D.G.); (C.M.); (U.R.)
| | - Cristina Mantovani
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (M.L.); (A.G.); (G.D.G.); (C.M.); (U.R.)
| | - Paolo Bironzo
- Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, 10043 Orbassano, Italy;
| | - Luca Mangherini
- Pathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (L.M.); (A.A.R.); (P.C.)
| | - Alessia Andrea Ricci
- Pathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (L.M.); (A.A.R.); (P.C.)
| | - Umberto Ricardi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (M.L.); (A.G.); (G.D.G.); (C.M.); (U.R.)
| | - Paola Cassoni
- Pathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (L.M.); (A.A.R.); (P.C.)
| | - Luca Bertero
- Pathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy; (L.M.); (A.A.R.); (P.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Terceiro LEL, Ikeogu NM, Lima MF, Edechi CA, Nickel BE, Fischer G, Leygue E, McManus KJ, Myal Y. Navigating the Blood-Brain Barrier: Challenges and Therapeutic Strategies in Breast Cancer Brain Metastases. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:12034. [PMID: 37569410 PMCID: PMC10418424 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241512034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Revised: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer in women, with metastatic BC being responsible for the highest number of deaths. A frequent site for BC metastasis is the brain. Brain metastasis derived from BC involves the cooperation of multiple genetic, epigenetic, angiogenic, and tumor-stroma interactions. Most of these interactions provide a unique opportunity for development of new therapeutic targets. Potentially targetable signaling pathways are Notch, Wnt, and the epidermal growth factor receptors signaling pathways, all of which are linked to driving BC brain metastasis (BCBM). However, a major challenge in treating brain metastasis remains the blood-brain barrier (BBB). This barrier restricts the access of unwanted molecules, cells, and targeted therapies to the brain parenchyma. Moreover, current therapies to treat brain metastases, such as stereotactic radiosurgery and whole-brain radiotherapy, have limited efficacy. Promising new drugs like phosphatase and kinase modulators, as well as BBB disruptors and immunotherapeutic strategies, have shown the potential to ease the disease in preclinical studies, but remain limited by multiple resistance mechanisms. This review summarizes some of the current understanding of the mechanisms involved in BC brain metastasis and highlights current challenges as well as opportunities in strategic designs of potentially successful future therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas E. L. Terceiro
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 3P5, Canada; (L.E.L.T.); (C.A.E.); (B.E.N.); (G.F.)
| | - Nnamdi M. Ikeogu
- Department of Immunology, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0T5, Canada;
| | - Matheus F. Lima
- Department of Physiology and Pathophysiology, CancerCare Manitoba Research Institute, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0V9, Canada;
| | - Chidalu A. Edechi
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 3P5, Canada; (L.E.L.T.); (C.A.E.); (B.E.N.); (G.F.)
| | - Barbara E. Nickel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 3P5, Canada; (L.E.L.T.); (C.A.E.); (B.E.N.); (G.F.)
| | - Gabor Fischer
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 3P5, Canada; (L.E.L.T.); (C.A.E.); (B.E.N.); (G.F.)
| | - Etienne Leygue
- Department of Biochemistry and Medical Genetics, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0T5, Canada; (E.L.); (K.J.M.)
| | - Kirk J. McManus
- Department of Biochemistry and Medical Genetics, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0T5, Canada; (E.L.); (K.J.M.)
- Paul Albrechtsen Research Institute, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0V9, Canada
| | - Yvonne Myal
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 3P5, Canada; (L.E.L.T.); (C.A.E.); (B.E.N.); (G.F.)
- Department of Physiology and Pathophysiology, CancerCare Manitoba Research Institute, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0V9, Canada;
- Paul Albrechtsen Research Institute, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0V9, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Grossenbacher B, Lareida A, Moors S, Roth P, Kulcsar Z, Regli L, Le Rhun E, Weller M, Wolpert F. Prognostic assessment in patients operated for brain metastasis from systemic tumors. Cancer Med 2023; 12:12316-12324. [PMID: 37039262 PMCID: PMC10278502 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 04/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Established models for prognostic assessment in patients with brain metastasis do not stratify for prior surgery. Here we tested the prognostic accuracy of the Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) score model in patients operated for BM and explored further prognostic factors. METHODS We included 285 patients operated for brain metastasis at the University Hospital Zurich in the analysis. Information on patient characteristics, imaging, staging, peri- and postoperative complications and survival were extracted from the files and integrated into a multivariate Cox hazard model. RESULTS The GPA score showed an association with outcome. We further identified residual tumor after surgery (p = 0.007, hazard ratio (HR) 1.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-2.3) steroid use (p = 0.021, HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.6) and number of extracranial metastasis sites (p = 0.009, HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.6) at the time of surgery as independent prognostic factors. A trend was observed for postoperative infection of the subarachnoid space (p = 0.102, HR 3.5, 95% CI 0.8-15.7). CONCLUSIONS We confirm the prognostic capacity of the GPA score in a cohort of operated patients with brain metastasis. However, extent of resection and steroid use provide additional aid for the prognostic assessment in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bettina Grossenbacher
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience CenterUniversity Hospital of Zurich, University of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
| | - Anna Lareida
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience CenterUniversity Hospital of Zurich, University of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
| | - Selina Moors
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience CenterUniversity Hospital of Zurich, University of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
| | - Patrick Roth
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience CenterUniversity Hospital of Zurich, University of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
| | - Zsolt Kulcsar
- Department of Neuroradiology, Clinical Neuroscience CenterUniversity Hospital of Zurich, University of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
| | - Luca Regli
- Department of NeurosurgeryUniversity Hospital of Zurich, University of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
| | - Emilie Le Rhun
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience CenterUniversity Hospital of Zurich, University of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
- Department of NeurosurgeryUniversity Hospital of Zurich, University of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience CenterUniversity Hospital of Zurich, University of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
| | - Fabian Wolpert
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience CenterUniversity Hospital of Zurich, University of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Martins Gama J, Caetano Oliveira R, Teixeira P, Silva F, Abrantes C, Figueiredo P, Simões S, Rebelo O, Cipriano MA. An Immunohistochemical Study of Breast Cancer Brain Metastases: The Role of CD44 and AKT in the Prognosis. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2023; 31:318-323. [PMID: 37093706 DOI: 10.1097/pai.0000000000001119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023]
Abstract
Breast cancer is a major health burden, and up to one-third of patients with breast cancer develop brain metastases, which are linked to a very poor prognosis. Few biomarkers are available to predict the prognosis of patients with metastases. Assessment by immunohistochemistry may be used as a tool to predict the behavior of these tumors. A retrospective transversal study including 114 patients (diagnosed between 2000 and 2016) with breast cancer brain metastases was carried out using archival biological material from 114 patients with breast cancer brain metastases. Expression of CD44, HER2, ER, PR, CA9, PDL-1, CD133, ALDH1, PTEN, AKT, PI3K, and AR markers was assessed by immunohistochemistry. The overexpression of CD44 and AKT was associated with worse overall survival ( P =0.047 and P =0,034, respectively), on univariate analysis, in the cohort of parenchymal and bone metastases; the impact of AKT expression was also evident in the parenchymal cohort on uni ( P =0.021) and multivariate analysis ( P =0.027). The remaining markers did not exhibit a statistical correlation. Immunohistochemistry markers such as CD44 and AKT may have a prognostic impact on survival in patients with breast cancer brain metastases. The conjugation with other markers may help with the stratification of patients and therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rui Caetano Oliveira
- Department of Pathology
- Clinical Academic Center of Coimbra (CACC)
- Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR) Area of Environment Genetics and Oncobiology (CIMAGO), Institute of Byophysics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra
| | | | | | - Carlos Abrantes
- Department of Pathology, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Coimbra Francisco Gentil, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Paulo Figueiredo
- Department of Pathology, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Coimbra Francisco Gentil, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Sandra Simões
- Neuropathology Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário Coimbra
| | - Olinda Rebelo
- Neuropathology Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário Coimbra
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Carpenter DJ, Leng J, Arshad M, Giles W, Kirkpatrick JP, Floyd SR, Chmura SJ, Salama JK, Hong JC. Intracranial and Extracranial Progression and Their Correlation With Overall Survival After Stereotactic Radiosurgery in a Multi-institutional Cohort With Brain Metastases. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2310117. [PMID: 37099292 PMCID: PMC10134007 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.10117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 04/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Clinical trials for metastatic malignant neoplasms are increasingly being extended to patients with brain metastases. Despite the preeminence of progression-free survival (PFS) as a primary oncologic end point, the correlation of intracranial progression (ICP) and extracranial progression (ECP) events with overall survival (OS) is poorly understood for patients with brain metastases following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Objective To determine the correlation of ICP and ECP with OS among patients with brain metastases completing an initial SRS course. Design, Setting, and Participants This multi-institutional retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2020. We included patients who completed an initial course of SRS for brain metastases during the study period, including receipt of single and/or multifraction SRS, prior whole-brain radiotherapy, and brain metastasis resection. Data analysis was performed on November 15, 2022. Exposures Non-OS end points included intracranial PFS, extracranial PFS, PFS, time to ICP, time to ECP, and any time to progression. Progression events were radiologically defined, incorporating multidisciplinary clinical consensus. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was correlation of surrogate end points to OS. Clinical end points were estimated from time of SRS completion via the Kaplan-Meier method, while end-point correlation to OS was measured using normal scores rank correlation with the iterative multiple imputation approach. Results This study included 1383 patients, with a mean age of 63.1 years (range, 20.9-92.8 years) and a median follow-up of 8.72 months (IQR, 3.25-19.68 months). The majority of participants were White (1032 [75%]), and more than half (758 [55%]) were women. Common primary tumor sites included the lung (757 [55%]), breast (203 [15%]), and skin (melanoma; 100 [7%]). Intracranial progression was observed in 698 patients (50%), preceding 492 of 1000 observed deaths (49%). Extracranial progression was observed in 800 patients (58%), preceding 627 of 1000 observed deaths (63%). Irrespective of deaths, 482 patients (35%) experienced both ICP and ECP, 534 (39%) experienced ICP (216 [16%]) or ECP (318 [23%]), and 367 (27%) experienced neither. The median OS was 9.93 months (95% CI, 9.08-11.05 months). Intracranial PFS had the highest correlation with OS (ρ = 0.84 [95% CI, 0.82-0.85]; median, 4.39 months [95% CI, 4.02-4.92 months]). Time to ICP had the lowest correlation with OS (ρ = 0.42 [95% CI, 0.34-0.50]) and the longest median time to event (median, 8.76 months [95% CI, 7.70-9.48 months]). Across specific primary tumor types, correlations of intracranial PFS and extracranial PFS with OS were consistently high despite corresponding differences in median outcome durations. Conclusions and Relevance The results of this cohort study of patients with brain metastases completing SRS suggest that intracranial PFS, extracranial PFS, and PFS had the highest correlations with OS and time to ICP had the lowest correlation with OS. These data may inform future patient inclusion and end-point selection for clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J. Carpenter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Jim Leng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Muzamil Arshad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Will Giles
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - John P. Kirkpatrick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Scott R. Floyd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Steven J. Chmura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Joseph K. Salama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Radiation Oncology Clinical Service, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Julian C. Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco
- Bakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco
- Joint Program in Computational Precision Health, University of California, San Francisco, and University of California, Berkeley
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Pellerino A, Garbossa D, Rudà R, Soffietti R. The role of the neurologist in the diagnosis and treatment of brain metastases and carcinomatous meningitis. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2023; 179:464-474. [PMID: 36990824 DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2023.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
Traditionally, in the past, most of central nervous system metastases from solid tumors were associated with an advanced phase of the disease needing palliation only, while to date they increasingly develop as an early and/or solitary relapse in patients with the systemic disease under control. This review will cover all the aspects of a modern management of brain and leptomeningeal metastases from diagnosis to the different therapeutic options, either local (surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, whole-brain radiotherapy with hippocampal avoidance) or systemic. Particular emphasis is reserved to the new-targeted drugs, that allow to target specifically driver molecular alterations. These new compounds pose new problems in terms of monitoring efficacy and adverse events, but increasingly they allow improvement of outcome in comparison to historical controls.
Collapse
|
23
|
Hu J, Xie X, Zhou W, Hu X, Sun X. The emerging potential of quantitative MRI biomarkers for the early prediction of brain metastasis response after stereotactic radiosurgery: a scoping review. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2023; 13:1174-1189. [PMID: 36819250 PMCID: PMC9929394 DOI: 10.21037/qims-22-412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Background At present, the simple prognostic models based on clinical information for predicting the treatment outcomes of brain metastases (BMs) are subjective and delayed. Thus, we performed this systematic review of multiple studies to assess the potential of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) biomarkers for the early prediction of treatment outcomes of brain metastases with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Methods We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Clinical Trials.gov databases for articles published between February 1, 1991, and April 11, 2022, with no language restrictions. We included studies involving patients with BMs receiving SRS; the included patients were required to have definite pathology of a primary tumor and complete imaging data (pre- and post-SRS). We excluded the articles that included patients who had undergone previous surgery and those that did not include regular follow-up or corresponding MRI scans. Results We identified 2,162 studies, of which 26 were included in our analysis, involving a total of 1,362 participants. All 26 studies explored the relevant MRI parameters to predict the prognosis of patients with BMs who received SRS. The outcomes were generalized according to the relationships between the anatomical/morphological, microstructural, vascular, and metabolic changes and SRS. Generally, with traditional MRI, there are several quantitative prognostic models based on preradiosurgical radiomics that predict the outcome of SRS treatment in local BM control. With the implementation of advanced MRI, the relative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), perfusion fraction (f), relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV), relative regional cerebral blood flow (rrCBF), interstitial fluid pressure (IFP), quadratic of time-dependent leakage (Ktrans 2), extracellular extravascular volume (ve), choline/creatine (Cho/Cr), nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE) peak, and intraextracellular water exchange rate constant (kIE ) were confirmed to be indicative of the therapeutic effect of SRS for BMs. Conclusions Quantitative MRI biomarkers extracted from traditional or advanced MRI at different time points, which can represent the anatomical/morphological, microstructural, vascular, and metabolic changes, respectively, have been proposed as promising markers for the early prediction of SRS response in those with BMs. There are some limitations in this review, including the risk of selection bias, the limited number of study objects, the incomparability of the total data, and the subjectivity of the review process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiamiao Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xuyun Xie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Weiwen Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiao Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiaonan Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Bottosso M, Griguolo G, Sinoquet L, Guarascio MC, Aldegheri V, Miglietta F, Vernaci G, Barbieri C, Girardi F, Jacot W, Guarneri V, Darlix A, Dieci MV. Prognostic impact of extracranial disease control in HER2+ breast cancer-related brain metastases. Br J Cancer 2023; 128:1286-1293. [PMID: 36717671 PMCID: PMC10049979 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02153-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Revised: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Brain metastases (BM) are common among HER2+ breast cancer (BC) and prognostic stratification is crucial for optimal management. BC-GPA score and subsequent refinements (modified-GPA, updated-GPA) recapitulate prognostic factors. Since none of these indexes includes extracranial disease control, we evaluated its prognostic value in HER2+ BCBM. METHODS Patients diagnosed with HER2+ BCBM at Istituto Oncologico Veneto-Padova (2002-2021) and Montpellier Cancer Institute (2001-2015) were included as exploratory and validation cohorts, respectively. Extracranial disease control at BM diagnosis (no disease/stable disease/response vs. progressive disease) was evaluated. RESULTS In the exploratory cohort of 113 patients (median OS 12.2 months), extracranial control (n = 65, 57.5%) was significantly associated with better OS at univariate (median OS 17.7 vs. 8.7 months, p = 0.005) and multivariate analysis after adjustment for BC-GPA (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39-0.94), modified-GPA (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.42-0.98) and updated-GPA (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.41-0.98). The prognostic impact of extracranial disease control (n = 66, 56.4%) was then confirmed in the validation cohort (n = 117) at univariate (median OS 20.2 vs. 9.1 months, p < 0.001) and multivariate analysis adjusting for BC-GPA (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.27-0.61), modified-GPA (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.29-0.67) and updated-GPA (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.28-0.63). CONCLUSIONS Extracranial disease control provides independent prognostic information in HER2+ BCBM beyond commonly used prognostic scores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Bottosso
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.,Division of Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Gaia Griguolo
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy. .,Division of Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova, Italy.
| | - Léa Sinoquet
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Maria Cristina Guarascio
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.,Division of Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | | | - Federica Miglietta
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.,Division of Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Grazia Vernaci
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.,Division of Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Caterina Barbieri
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.,Division of Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Fabio Girardi
- Division of Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - William Jacot
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Valentina Guarneri
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.,Division of Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Amélie Darlix
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.,Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, INSERM, CNRS - University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Maria Vittoria Dieci
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.,Division of Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Fan JH, Zhang S, Yang H, Yi ZB, Ouyang QC, Yan M, Wang XJ, Hu XC, Jiang ZF, Huang T, Tong ZS, Wang SS, Yin YM, Li H, Yang RX, Yang HW, Teng YE, Sun T, Cai L, Li HY, Ouyang XN, He JJ, Liu XL, Yang SE, Wang JY, Xu BH, Qiao YL. Molecular subtypes predict the preferential site of distant metastasis in advanced breast cancer: a nationwide retrospective study. Front Oncol 2023; 13:978985. [PMID: 36761968 PMCID: PMC9905808 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.978985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to explore possible associations between molecular subtypes and site of distant metastasis in advanced breast cancer (ABC). Methods 3577 ABC patients were selected from 21 hospitals of seven geographic regions in China from 2012-2014. A questionnaire was designed to collect medical information regarding demographic characteristics, risk factors, molecular subtype, recurrence/metastasis information, and disease-free survival (DFS). The cancers were classified into Luminal A, Luminal B, HER2-enriched and Triple Negative subtypes. Chi-square test and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were performed to explore the associations between molecular subtypes and distant metastasis sites. Results A total of 2393 cases with molecular subtypes information were finally examined. Patients with Luminal A (51.1%) and Luminal B (44.7%) were most prone to bone metastasis, whereas liver metastasis was more frequently observed in HER2-enriched ABC patients (29.1%).The cumulative recurrence and metastasis rates of ABC patients at 36 months of DFS were the most significant within molecular types, of which Triple Negative was the highest (82.7%), while that of Luminal A was the lowest (58.4%). In the adjusted Cox regression analysis, Luminal B, HER2-enriched and Triple Negative subtypes increased the risk of visceral metastasis by 23%, 46% and 87% respectively. In addition, Triple Negative patients had a higher probability of brain metastasis (HR 3.07, 95% CI: 1.04-9.07). Conclusion Molecular subtypes can predict the preferential sites of distant metastasis, emphasizing that these associations were of great help in choices for surveillance, developing appropriate screening and cancer management strategies for follow-up and personalized therapy in ABC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin-Hu Fan
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Su Zhang
- Department of Operations Management, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Huan Yang
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zong-Bi Yi
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Qu-Chang Ouyang
- Department of Breast Cancer Medical Oncology, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, China
| | - Min Yan
- Department of Breast Disease, Henan Breast Cancer Center, The affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Xiao-Jia Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xi-Chun Hu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Ze-Fei Jiang
- Department of Breast Cancer, The Fifth Medical Centre of Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Tao Huang
- Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Zhong-Sheng Tong
- Department of Breast Oncology, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Shu-Sen Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yong-Mei Yin
- Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Hui Li
- Department of Breast Surgery, Sichuan Province Tumor Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Run-Xiang Yang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
| | - Hua-Wei Yang
- Department of Breast Surgery, The Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Yue-E. Teng
- Departments of Medical Oncology and Thoracic Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Tao Sun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Key Laboratory of Liaoning Breast Cancer Research, Shenyang, China
| | - Li Cai
- The 4th Department of Internal Medical Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China
| | - Hong-Yuan Li
- Department of the Endocrine and Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Xue-Nong Ouyang
- Department of Medicine Oncology, 900Hospital of the Joint Logistics Team, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jian-Jun He
- Department of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China
| | - Xin-Lan Liu
- Department of oncology, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Ningxia, China
| | - Shun-E. Yang
- Department of Breast Cancer and Lymphoma, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China
| | - Jia-Yu Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China,*Correspondence: You-Lin Qiao, ; Jia-Yu Wang, ; Bing-He Xu,
| | - Bing-He Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China,*Correspondence: You-Lin Qiao, ; Jia-Yu Wang, ; Bing-He Xu,
| | - You-Lin Qiao
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China,*Correspondence: You-Lin Qiao, ; Jia-Yu Wang, ; Bing-He Xu,
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Sun H, Xu J, Dai S, Ma Y, Sun T. Breast cancer brain metastasis: Current evidence and future directions. Cancer Med 2023; 12:1007-1024. [PMID: 35822637 PMCID: PMC9883555 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Revised: 06/26/2022] [Accepted: 06/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths after lung cancer. Metastasis of the central nervous system is a terrible event for breast cancer patients, affecting their survival and quality of life. Compared with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer patients, brain metastases are more likely to affect patients with triple-negative breast cancer and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer. The treatment of breast cancer has improved greatly in the last two decades. However, brain metastases from breast cancer remain the leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Patients with breast cancer brain metastasis have been in an inferior position due to the lack of clinical research in this field, and they are often explicitly excluded from almost all clinical trials. The occurrence and progression of brain metastases will result in severe cognitive impairment and adverse physical consequences, so we must have a good understanding of the molecular mechanisms of breast cancer brain metastasis. In this article, we have retrieved the latest literature of molecules and pathways associated with breast cancer brain metastasis, summarized common therapy strategies, and discussed the prospects and clinical implications of targeting the molecules involved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongna Sun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Junnan Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Shuang Dai
- Department of Medical Oncology, Lung cancer center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yiwen Ma
- Department of Medical Oncology, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Tao Sun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Prognostic Factors and Survival According to Tumor Subtype in Women With Breast Cancer Brain Metastases. Curr Probl Cancer 2022; 46:100866. [PMID: 36179388 DOI: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2022.100866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2022] [Revised: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is the second most cause of central nervous system (CNS) metastases. Studies report that almost one third of patients (pts) with triple-negative, one-third with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive and 15% of those with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer will develop brain metastases. It is known that the development of symptomatic brain metastases in women with advanced breast cancer is associated with poor prognosis, irrespective of local and systemic treatments. In the present study, we aim to determine the association between BC subtypes and CNS metastases occurrence and prognosis. Retrospective analysis of 309 BC patients with CNS metastases, confirmed by pathological and/or radiological methods, treated in a Cancer Center between 2003 and 2021, was obtained to identify clinicopathologic factors associated with early onset of brain metastases and survival outcomes. For analysis purposes, 3 BC subtypes were considered according to hormone receptor status and HER-2 expression: ER and/or PR positive, HER-2 positive and triple negative. The median time between diagnosis of BC and detection of CNS metastases was 43 months, and it was significantly shorter in triple negative group (8 months). Twenty-one patients (6,8%) had CNS metastases at BC diagnosis, with CNS being the first site of recurrence in 35,3%, mainly in HER2 positive. Most of the patients had parenchymal metastases (n = 245) and 37 (12%) had leptomeningeal (LM) disease, with predominance in ER and/or PR positive subtype (70,3%). In patients submitted to CNS surgery, the concordance between primary tumor and metastases subtype was higher in triple negative (76,9%) compared to 63,2% in HER-2 positive and 38,9% in ER and/or PR positive group (P < 0.05). After CNS involvement, 25,4% (n = 34) of patients with triple negative disease did not receive any systemic therapy, compared to 30,6% (n = 41) in HER-2 positive and 44% (n = 59) in ER and/or PR positive groups (P = 0.05). Median survival after CNS metastases was 9 months, but significantly longer in HER-2 positive group (16 months) and in patients submitted to surgical resection of CNS metastases, irrespectively of subtype (22 months vs 5 months in other treatment modalities). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, having HER-2 positive tumor was an independent prognostic factor for increasing survival after CNS metastases (HR 0.60, 95% CI: 0.41-0.87, P = 0.007), regardless the therapeutic strategy. Clinical behavior and prognosis of CNS metastases varies according to BC subtype. The association between LM disease and ER and/or PR positive tumors should be explored in upcoming studies. Also, these patients' prognosis depends on the availability of specific treatment options, therefore, innovative and effective therapeutic approaches are needed, in order to improve survival and quality of life of these patients.
Collapse
|
28
|
Prognostic Model for Intracranial Progression after Stereotactic Radiosurgery: A Multicenter Validation Study. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14215186. [PMID: 36358606 PMCID: PMC9657742 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14215186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2022] [Revised: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a standard of care for many patients with brain metastases. To optimize post-SRS surveillance, this study aimed to validate a previously published nomogram predicting post-SRS intracranial progression (IP). We identified consecutive patients completing an initial course of SRS across two institutions between July 2017 and December 2020. Patients were classified as low- or high-risk for post-SRS IP per a previously published nomogram. Overall survival (OS) and freedom from IP (FFIP) were assessed via the Kaplan−Meier method. Assessment of parameters impacting FFIP was performed with univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models. Among 890 patients, median follow-up was 9.8 months (95% CI 9.1−11.2 months). In total, 47% had NSCLC primary tumors, and 47% had oligometastatic disease (defined as ≤5 metastastic foci) at the time of SRS. Per the IP nomogram, 53% of patients were deemed high-risk. For low- and high-risk patients, median FFIP was 13.9 months (95% CI 11.1−17.1 months) and 7.6 months (95% CI 6.4−9.3 months), respectively, and FFIP was superior in low-risk patients (p < 0.0001). This large multisite BM cohort supports the use of an IP nomogram as a quick and simple means of stratifying patients into low- and high-risk groups for post-SRS IP.
Collapse
|
29
|
Hamester F, Stürken C, Legler K, Eylmann K, Möller K, Roßberg M, Gorzelanny C, Bauer AT, Windhorst S, Schmalfeldt B, Laakmann E, Müller V, Witzel I, Oliveira-Ferrer L. Key Role of Hyaluronan Metabolism for the Development of Brain Metastases in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Cells 2022; 11:3275. [PMID: 36291142 PMCID: PMC9600690 DOI: 10.3390/cells11203275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2022] [Revised: 10/08/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 09/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is the second-most common cause of brain metastases (BM) and BCBM patients have a reduced quality of life and a poor prognosis. Hyaluronan (HA), and in particular the hyaluronidase Hyal-1, has been already linked to the development of BCBM, and therefore presents an interesting opportunity to develop new effective therapeutic options. HA metabolism was further discovered by the CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of HYAL1 and the shRNA-mediated down-regulation of HA-receptor CD44 in the brain-seeking triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cell line MDA-MB-231-BR. Therefore, the impact of Hyal-1 on adhesion, disruption, and invasion through the brain endothelium, both in vitro and in vivo, was studied. Our analysis points out a key role of Hyal-1 and low-molecular-weight HA (LMW-HA) in the formation of a pericellular HA-coat in BC cells, which in turn promotes tumor cell adhesion, disruption, and migration through the brain endothelium in vitro as well as the extent of BM in vivo. CD44 knockdown in MDA-MB-231-BR significantly reduced the pericellular HA-coat on these cells, and, consequently, tumor cell adhesion and invasion through the brain endothelium. Thus, the interaction between Hyal-1-generated LMW-HA fragments and the HA-receptor CD44 might represent a potential target for future therapeutic options in BC patients with a high risk of cerebral metastases formation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabienne Hamester
- Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christine Stürken
- Department of Anatomy and Experimental Morphology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
- MSH Medical School Hamburg, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Karen Legler
- Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Kathrin Eylmann
- Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Katrin Möller
- Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Maila Roßberg
- Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christian Gorzelanny
- Department of Dermatology and Venerology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alexander T. Bauer
- Department of Dermatology and Venerology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sabine Windhorst
- Department of Biochemistry and Signal Transduction, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Barbara Schmalfeldt
- Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Elena Laakmann
- Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Isabell Witzel
- Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Leticia Oliveira-Ferrer
- Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Aizer AA, Lamba N, Ahluwalia MS, Aldape K, Boire A, Brastianos PK, Brown PD, Camidge DR, Chiang VL, Davies MA, Hu LS, Huang RY, Kaufmann T, Kumthekar P, Lam K, Lee EQ, Lin NU, Mehta M, Parsons M, Reardon DA, Sheehan J, Soffietti R, Tawbi H, Weller M, Wen PY. Brain metastases: A Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) consensus review on current management and future directions. Neuro Oncol 2022; 24:1613-1646. [PMID: 35762249 PMCID: PMC9527527 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Brain metastases occur commonly in patients with advanced solid malignancies. Yet, less is known about brain metastases than cancer-related entities of similar incidence. Advances in oncologic care have heightened the importance of intracranial management. Here, in this consensus review supported by the Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO), we review the landscape of brain metastases with particular attention to management approaches and ongoing efforts with potential to shape future paradigms of care. Each coauthor carried an area of expertise within the field of brain metastases and initially composed, edited, or reviewed their specific subsection of interest. After each subsection was accordingly written, multiple drafts of the manuscript were circulated to the entire list of authors for group discussion and feedback. The hope is that the these consensus guidelines will accelerate progress in the understanding and management of patients with brain metastases, and highlight key areas in need of further exploration that will lead to dedicated trials and other research investigations designed to advance the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayal A Aizer
- Corresponding Author: Dr. Ayal A. Aizer, MD/MHS, Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA ()
| | | | | | - Kenneth Aldape
- Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Adrienne Boire
- Department of Neurology, Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Priscilla K Brastianos
- Departments of Neuro-Oncology and Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Paul D Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - D Ross Camidge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Veronica L Chiang
- Departments of Neurosurgery and Radiation Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Michael A Davies
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Leland S Hu
- Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology Division, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Raymond Y Huang
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Priya Kumthekar
- Department of Neurology at The Feinberg School of Medicine at Northwestern University and The Malnati Brain Tumor Institute at the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Keng Lam
- Department of Neurology, Kaiser Permanente, Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Eudocia Q Lee
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nancy U Lin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Minesh Mehta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Michael Parsons
- Departments of Oncology and Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - David A Reardon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jason Sheehan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Riccardo Soffietti
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience Rita Levi Montalcini, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Hussein Tawbi
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Singh K, Saxena S, Khosla AA, McDermott MW, Kotecha RR, Ahluwalia MS. Update on the Management of Brain Metastasis. Neurotherapeutics 2022; 19:1772-1781. [PMID: 36422836 PMCID: PMC9723062 DOI: 10.1007/s13311-022-01312-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Brain metastases occur in almost one-third of adult patients with solid tumor malignancies and lead to considerable patient morbidity and mortality. The rising incidence of brain metastases has been ascribed to the development of better imaging and screening techniques and the formulation of better systemic therapies. Until recently, the multimodal management of brain metastases focused primarily on the utilization of neurosurgical techniques, with varying combinations of whole-brain radiation therapy and stereotactic radio-surgical procedures. Over the past 2 decades, in particular, the increment in knowledge pertaining to molecular genetics and the pathogenesis of brain metastases has led to significant developments in targeted therapies and immunotherapies. This review article highlights the recent updates in the management of brain metastases with an emphasis on novel systemic therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karanvir Singh
- Division of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, 33176, USA
| | - Shreya Saxena
- Division of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, 33176, USA
| | - Atulya A Khosla
- Division of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, 33176, USA
| | - Michael W McDermott
- Division of Neurosurgery, Miami Neuroscience Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, 33176, USA
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, 33199, USA
| | - Rupesh R Kotecha
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, 33176, USA
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, 33199, USA
| | - Manmeet S Ahluwalia
- Division of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, 33176, USA.
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, 33199, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Combining Organoid Models with Next-Generation Sequencing to Reveal Tumor Heterogeneity and Predict Therapeutic Response in Breast Cancer. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2022; 2022:9390912. [PMID: 36046364 PMCID: PMC9423951 DOI: 10.1155/2022/9390912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer (BC) is a common subtype of BC with a relatively good prognosis. However, recurrence and death from ER+ BC occur because of tumor heterogeneity. This study aimed to explore tumor heterogeneity using next-generation sequencing (NGS) and tumor-organoid models to promote BC precise therapy. We collected needle biopsy, surgical excision, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples to establish tumor organoids. We found that the histological characteristics of organoids were consistent with original lesions and recapitulated their heterogenicity. In addition, the NGS results showed that PIK3CA and TP53 genes had detrimental mutations. BAP1, RET, AXIN2, and PPP2R2A genes had mutations with unknown function. The score for homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) of genome was 56, indicating that the tumor was likely sensitive to PARPi. The mutant-allele tumor heterogeneity (MATH) value of the tumor genome was 68.03, indicating high tumor heterogeneity. At last, we performed a drug screening on organoids. The toxicity of different drugs toward BC organoids originated from needle biopsy and surgical excision was tested, respectively. The IC50 values in the needle biopsy groups were paclitaxel 2.83 μM, carboplatin 61.47 μM, neratinib 0.8 μM, lapatinib >100 μM; in the surgical excision groups: trastuzumab >100 μM, docetaxel 0.036 μM, tamoxifen 20.54 μM, olaparib 5.478 μM, BYL719 < 0.1 μM. The toxicity data showed that the BC organoids could show dynamic characteristics of tumor progression and reflect the heterogeneity of BC. Our study demonstrates that the combined use of tumor organoids and NGS is a potential way to test tumor heterogeneity and predict drug response in ER + BC, which contributes to the development of personalized therapy.
Collapse
|
33
|
Comparison of setup errors of immobilization devices for thoracic radiotherapy. Med Dosim 2022; 47:325-328. [PMID: 35842364 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2022.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 06/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Performance of thoracic radiotherapy may be assisted by the use of thoracoabdominal flat immobilization devices (TAFIDs) and integrated cervicothoracic immobilization devices (ICTIDs). This study was performed to compare setup errors of TAFIDs and ICTIDs. Forty-four patients with lung cancer were retrospectively reviewed; 22 patients were immobilized with a TAFID and 22 with an ICTID. In total, 343 cone-beam computed tomography images of these patients were collected for radiotherapy setup. The 3-dimensional setup errors and the displacement of the acromioclavicular joint against the supraclavicular region were calculated. An independent-samples t-test and rank-sum test were used for statistical analyses. The translational setup errors of the TAFID group vs ICTID group in the left-right (LR), superior-inferior (SI), and anterior-posterior (AP) directions were 0.14 ± 0.17 vs 0.14 ± 0.16 cm (p = 0.364), 0.23 ± 0.26 vs 0.15 ± 0.15 cm (p = 0.000), and 0.16 ± 0.15 vs 0.12 ± 0.14 cm (p = 0.049), respectively. The relative displacement of the acromioclavicular joint against the supraclavicular joint in the LR, SI, and AP directions were 0.10 ± 0.12 vs 0.09 ± 0.10 cm (p = 0.176), 0.13 ± 0.13 vs 0.11 ± 0.12 cm (p = 0.083), and 0.17 ± 0.16 vs 0.12 ± 0.11 cm (p = 0.001), respectively. The overall displacement of the supraclavicular region was 0.28 ± 0.19 vs 0.23 ± 0.15 cm (p < 0.001). The recommended planning target volume margins in the LR, SI, and AP directions were 0.46 vs 0.74 cm, 0.51 vs 0.47 cm, and 0.49 vs 0.41 cm, respectively. For patients with lung cancer, using an ICTID can reduce setup errors in the SI direction and displacements of the acromioclavicular joint and supraclavicular region compared with a TAFID. Therefore, an ICTID is preferred for patients with lung cancer with supraclavicular target volume.
Collapse
|
34
|
Local and systemic therapy in breast cancer patients with central nervous system metastases. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2022; 194:365-384. [PMID: 35680734 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06605-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE As survival of patients with central nervous system (CNS) metastases from breast cancer is poor and incidence rates are increasing, there is a growing need for better treatment strategies. In the current study, the efficacy of local and systemic therapies was analyzed in breast cancer patients with CNS metastases. METHODS Medical records from breast cancer patients with brain and/or leptomeningeal metastases (LM) treated at a tertiary referral center and a teaching hospital between 2010 and 2020 were retrospectively studied. Main outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS) and CNS progression free survival. Analyses were performed among patients with brain metastases (BM) and patients with LM, for the different systemic and local therapies for CNS metastases, and for subgroups based on breast cancer subtypes. RESULTS We identified 155 patients, 97 with BM and 58 with LM. Median OS was 15.9 months for patients with BM and 1.5 months for patients with LM. Median OS was significantly longer for HER2-positive patients with BM (22.8 months) vs triple negative (8.4 months) and hormone receptor positive/HER2-negative (5.9 months) (P < 0.001). Patients with BM receiving both local and systemic therapy also had a longer median OS (21.8 months), compared to the other three subgroups (local therapy only: 9.9 months, systemic therapy only: 4.3 months, no therapy: 0.5 months, P < 0.001). No significant difference in OS was observed between different systemic treatment regimens. CONCLUSION Breast cancer patients with BM show longest median OS when the subtype is HER2-positive and when they are treated with both local and systemic therapy.
Collapse
|
35
|
Yoo J, Park HH, Kang SG, Chang JH. Recent Update on Neurosurgical Management of Brain Metastasis. Brain Tumor Res Treat 2022; 10:164-171. [PMID: 35929114 PMCID: PMC9353165 DOI: 10.14791/btrt.2022.0023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Revised: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Brain metastasis (BM), classified as a secondary brain tumor, is the most common malignant central nervous system tumor whose median overall survival is approximately 6 months. However, the survival rate of patients with BMs has increased with recent advancements in immunotherapy and targeted therapy. This means that clinicians should take a more active position in the treatment paradigm that passively treats BMs. Because patients with BM are treated in a variety of clinical settings, treatment planning requires a more sophisticated decision-making process than that for other primary malignancies. Therefore, an accurate prognostic prediction is essential, for which a graded prognostic assessment that reflects next-generation sequencing can be helpful. It is also essential to understand the indications for various treatment modalities, such as surgical resection, stereotactic radiosurgery, and whole-brain radiotherapy and consider their advantages and disadvantages when choosing a treatment plan. Surgical resection serves a limited auxiliary function in BM, but it can be an essential therapeutic approach for increasing the survival rate of specific patients; therefore, this must be thoroughly recognized during the treatment process. The ultimate goal of surgical resection is maximal safe resection; to this end, neuronavigation, intraoperative neuro-electrophysiologic assessment including evoked potential, and the use of fluorescent materials could be helpful. In this review, we summarize the considerations for neurosurgical treatment in a rapidly changing treatment environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jihwan Yoo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hun Ho Park
- Department of Neurosurgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seok-Gu Kang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong Hee Chang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Gutierrez Torres S, Maldonado Magos F, Turcott JG, Hernandez‐Martinez J, Cacho‐Díaz B, Cardona A, Mota‐García A, Lozano Ruiz F, Ramos‐Ramirez M, Arrieta O. Re-irradiation in patients with progressive or recurrent brain metastases from extracranial solid tumors: A novel prognostic index. Cancer Med 2022; 12:146-158. [PMID: 35770957 PMCID: PMC9844632 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Revised: 05/27/2022] [Accepted: 05/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most studies evaluating factors associated with the survival of patients with brain metastases (BM) have focused on patients with newly diagnosed BM. This study aimed to identify prognostic factors associated with survival after brain re-irradiation in order to develop a new prognostic index. METHODS This 5-year retrospective study included patients treated with repeat-radiotherapy for recurrent BM at the "Instituto Nacional de Cancerología" of Mexico between 2015 and 2019. Significant variables in the multivariate Cox regression analysis were used to create the brain re-irradiation index (BRI). Survival and group comparisons were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. RESULTS Fifty-seven patients receiving brain re-irradiation were identified. Most patients were women (75.4%) with a mean age at BM diagnosis of 51.4 years. Lung and breast cancer were the most prevalent neoplasms (43.9% each). Independent prognostic factors for shorter survival after re-irradiation were: Age >50 years (hazard ratio [HR]:2.5 [95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-5.8]; p = 0.026), uncontrolled primary tumor (HR:5.5 [95% CI, 2.2-13.5]; p < 0.001), lesion size >20 mm (4.6 [95% CI, 1.7-12.2]; p = 0.002), and an interval <12 months between radiation treatments (HR:4.3 [95% CI, 1.7-10.6]; p = 0.001). Median survival (MS) after re-irradiation was 14.6 months (95% CI, 8.2-20.9).MS of patients stratified according to the BRI score was 17.38, 10.34, and 2.82 months, with significant differences between all groups. CONCLUSIONS The new BRI can be easily implemented for the prognostic classification of cancer patients with progressive or recurrent BM from extracranial solid tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jenny G. Turcott
- Thoracic Oncology UnitInstituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan)Mexico CityMexico
| | - Juan‐Manuel Hernandez‐Martinez
- Thoracic Oncology UnitInstituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan)Mexico CityMexico,Cátedras CONACYT‐Instituto Nacional de CancerologíaMexico CityMexico
| | - Bernardo Cacho‐Díaz
- Neuro‐Oncology UnitInstituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan)Mexico CityMexico
| | - Andrés F. Cardona
- Luis Carlos Sarmiento Angulo Cancer Treatment and Research Center (CTIC)BogotáColombia,Foundation for Clinical and Applied Cancer Research (FICMAC)BogotáColombia,Molecular Oncology and Biology Systems Research Group (FOX‐G/ONCOLGroup)Universidad El BosqueBogotáColombia
| | - Aida Mota‐García
- Radiotherapy UnitInstituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan)Mexico CityMexico
| | | | | | - Oscar Arrieta
- Thoracic Oncology UnitInstituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan)Mexico CityMexico
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Wang Y, Lang J, Zuo JZ, Dong Y, Hu Z, Xu X, Zhang Y, Wang Q, Yang L, Wong STC, Wang H, Li H. The radiomic-clinical model using the SHAP method for assessing the treatment response of whole-brain radiotherapy: a multicentric study. Eur Radiol 2022; 32:8737-8747. [PMID: 35678859 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08887-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Revised: 05/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop and validate a pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based radiomic-clinical model to assess the treatment response of whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) by using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), which is derived from game theory, and can explain the output of different machine learning models. METHODS We retrospectively enrolled 228 patients with brain metastases from two medical centers (184 in the training cohort and 44 in the validation cohort). Treatment responses of patients were categorized as a non-responding group vs. a responding group according to the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Brain Metastases (RANO-BM) criteria. For each tumor, 960 features were extracted from the MRI sequence. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) was used for feature selection. A support vector machine (SVM) model incorporating clinical factors and radiomic features wase used to construct the radiomic-clinical model. SHAP method explained the SVM model by prioritizing the importance of features, in terms of assessment contribution. RESULTS Three radiomic features and three clinical factors were identified to build the model. Radiomic-clinical model yielded AUCs of 0.928 (95%CI 0.901-0.949) and 0.851 (95%CI 0.816-0.886) for assessing the treatment response in the training cohort and validation cohort, respectively. SHAP summary plot illustrated the feature's value affected the feature's impact attributed to model, and SHAP force plot showed the integration of features' impact attributed to individual response. CONCLUSION The radiomic-clinical model with the SHAP method can be useful for assessing the treatment response of WBRT and may assist clinicians in directing personalized WBRT strategies in an understandable manner. KEY POINTS • Radiomic-clinical model can be useful for assessing the treatment response of WBRT. • SHAP could explain and visualize radiomic-clinical machine learning model in a clinician-friendly way.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yixin Wang
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Medical Physics and Technology, Institute of Health and Medical Technology, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230031, People's Republic of China.,University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230026, People's Republic of China.,Department of Oncology, Hefei Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230031, People's Republic of China
| | - Jinwei Lang
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Medical Physics and Technology, Institute of Health and Medical Technology, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230031, People's Republic of China.,University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230026, People's Republic of China
| | - Joey Zhaoyu Zuo
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Medical Physics and Technology, Institute of Health and Medical Technology, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230031, People's Republic of China.,University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230026, People's Republic of China
| | - Yaqin Dong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230022, People's Republic of China
| | - Zongtao Hu
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Medical Physics and Technology, Institute of Health and Medical Technology, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230031, People's Republic of China.,Department of Oncology, Hefei Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230031, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiuli Xu
- Department of Oncology, Hefei Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230031, People's Republic of China
| | - Yongkang Zhang
- Department of Oncology, Hefei Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230031, People's Republic of China
| | - Qinjie Wang
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Medical Physics and Technology, Institute of Health and Medical Technology, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230031, People's Republic of China.,University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230026, People's Republic of China
| | - Lizhuang Yang
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Medical Physics and Technology, Institute of Health and Medical Technology, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230031, People's Republic of China.,University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230026, People's Republic of China.,Department of Oncology, Hefei Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230031, People's Republic of China
| | - Stephen T C Wong
- Department of Systems Medicine and Bioengineering, Houston Methodist Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Hongzhi Wang
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Medical Physics and Technology, Institute of Health and Medical Technology, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230031, People's Republic of China. .,University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230026, People's Republic of China. .,Department of Oncology, Hefei Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230031, People's Republic of China.
| | - Hai Li
- Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Medical Physics and Technology, Institute of Health and Medical Technology, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230031, People's Republic of China. .,University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230026, People's Republic of China. .,Department of Oncology, Hefei Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, 230031, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Ratosa I, Dobnikar N, Bottosso M, Dieci MV, Jacot W, Pouderoux S, Ribnikar D, Sinoquet L, Guarneri V, Znidaric T, Darlix A, Griguolo G. Leptomeningeal metastases in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive breast cancer: real-world data from a multicentric European cohort. Int J Cancer 2022; 151:1355-1366. [PMID: 35666525 PMCID: PMC9540903 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2022] [Revised: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
In patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2+) breast cancer, leptomeningeal metastases (LM) are a rare but often a fatal clinical scenario. In this multicentric study, clinical and pathologic characteristics of patients with HER2+ breast cancer developing LM were described, as well as survival outcomes. Data were gathered retrospectively from medical records of 82 patients with advanced HER2+ breast cancer and LM treated between August 2005 and July 2020. Following LM diagnosis, 79 (96.3%) patients received at least one line of anti‐HER2 therapy, 25 (30.5%) patients received intrathecal therapy and 58 (70.7%) patients received radiotherapy. Overall survival (OS) was 8.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.7‐11), 1‐year OS was 42%, and 2‐year OS was 21%. At univariate analysis, patients who were treated after 2010, had better Karnofsky performance status, were free of neurological symptoms, had better prognostic, received chemotherapy (OS difference 9.4 months, P = .024), or monoclonal antibodies (trastuzumab ± pertuzumab; OS difference 6.1 months; P = .013) after LM diagnosis, had a statistically significantly longer OS. Presence of neurological symptoms (hazard ratio 3.32, 95% CI 1.26‐8.73; P = .015) and not having received radiotherapy (hazard ratio 2.02, 95% CI 1.09‐3.72; P = .024) were all associated with poorer OS at multivariate analysis. To summarize, not having neurological symptoms and receiving RT at LM diagnosis were associated with prolonged OS in our cohort. Survival seemed to be prolonged with multimodality treatment, which included targeted therapy, chemotherapy, and RT to the LM sites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivica Ratosa
- Division of Radiotherapy, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Nika Dobnikar
- Division of Radiotherapy, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Michele Bottosso
- Division of Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova, Italy.,Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Maria Vittoria Dieci
- Division of Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova, Italy.,Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - William Jacot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Stéphane Pouderoux
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Domen Ribnikar
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.,Division of Medical Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Léa Sinoquet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Valentina Guarneri
- Division of Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova, Italy.,Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Tanja Znidaric
- Department of Oncology, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Amélie Darlix
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.,Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, INSERM, CNRS, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Gaia Griguolo
- Division of Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova, Italy.,Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
ADC textural features in patients with single brain metastases improve clinical risk models. Clin Exp Metastasis 2022; 39:459-466. [PMID: 35394585 PMCID: PMC9117356 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-022-10160-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2021] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
AIMS In this retrospective study we performed a quantitative textural analysis of apparant diffusion coefficient (ADC) images derived from diffusion weighted MRI (DW-MRI) of single brain metastases (BM) patients from different primary tumors and tested whether these imaging parameters may improve established clinical risk models. METHODS We identified 87 patients with single BM who had a DW-MRI at initial diagnosis. Applying image segmentation, volumes of contrast-enhanced lesions in T1 sequences, hyperintense T2 lesions (peritumoral border zone (T2PZ)) and tumor-free gray and white matter compartment (GMWMC) were generated and registered to corresponding ADC maps. ADC textural parameters were generated and a linear backward regression model was applied selecting imaging features in association with survival. A cox proportional hazard model with backward regression was fitted for the clinical prognostic models (diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment score (DS-GPA) and the recursive partitioning analysis (RPA)) including these imaging features. RESULTS Thirty ADC textural parameters were generated and linear backward regression identified eight independent imaging parameters which in combination predicted survival. Five ADC texture features derived from T2PZ, the volume of the T2PZ, the normalized mean ADC of the GMWMC as well as the mean ADC slope of T2PZ. A cox backward regression including the DS-GPA, RPA and these eight parameters identified two MRI features which improved the two risk scores (HR = 1.14 [1.05;1.24] for normalized mean ADC GMWMC and HR = 0.87 [0.77;0.97]) for ADC 3D kurtosis of the T2PZ.) CONCLUSIONS: Textural analysis of ADC maps in patients with single brain metastases improved established clinical risk models. These findings may aid to better understand the pathogenesis of BM and may allow selection of patients for new treatment options.
Collapse
|
40
|
Menendez JA, Lupu R. Fatty acid synthase: A druggable driver of breast cancer brain metastasis. Expert Opin Ther Targets 2022; 26:427-444. [PMID: 35545806 DOI: 10.1080/14728222.2022.2077189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Brain metastasis (BrM) is a key contributor to morbidity and mortality in breast cancer patients, especially among high-risk epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) and triple-negative/basal-like molecular subtypes. Optimal management of BrM is focused on characterizing a "BrM dependency map" to prioritize targetable therapeutic vulnerabilities. AREAS COVERED We review recent studies addressing the targeting of BrM in the lipid-deprived brain environment, which selects for brain-tropic breast cancer cells capable of cell-autonomously generating fatty acids by upregulating de novo lipogenesis via fatty acid synthase (FASN). Disruption of FASN activity impairs breast cancer growth in the brain, but not extracranially, and mapping of the molecular causes of organ-specific patterns of metastasis has uncovered an enrichment of lipid metabolism signatures in brain metastasizing cells. Targeting SREBP1-the master regulator of lipogenic gene transcription-curtails the ability of breast cancer cells to survive in the brain microenvironment. EXPERT OPINION Targeting FASN represents a new therapeutic opportunity for patients with breast cancer and BrM. Delivery of brain-permeable FASN inhibitors and identifying strategies to target metabolic plasticity that might compensate for impaired brain FASN activity are two potential roadblocks that may hinder FASN-centered strategies against BrM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier A Menendez
- Metabolism and Cancer Group, Program Against Cancer Therapeutic Resistance (ProCURE), Catalan Institute of Oncology, 17007 Girona, Spain.,Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), 17190 Girona, Spain
| | - Ruth Lupu
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Division of Experimental Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.,Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Laboratory, Mayo Clinic Minnesota, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.,Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Kraft J, van Timmeren JE, Frei S, Mayinger M, Borsky K, Kirchner C, Stark LS, Tanadini-Lang S, Wolpert F, Weller M, Woodruff HC, Guckenberger M, Andratschke N. Comprehensive summary and retrospective evaluation of prognostic scores for patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases treated with upfront radiosurgery in a modern patient collective. Radiother Oncol 2022; 172:23-31. [PMID: 35489445 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.04.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2021] [Revised: 04/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Numerous prognostic scores (PS) for patients with brain metastases (BM) have been developed. Recently, PS based on laboratory parameters were introduced to better predict overall survival (OS). A comprehensive comparison of the wide range of scores in a modern patient collective is still missing. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twelve PS considering clinical parameters only at the time of BM diagnosis were calculated for 470 patients receiving upfront SRS between January 2014 and March 2020. In a subcohort of 310 patients where a full laboratory dataset was available five additional prognostic scores were compared. Restricted mean survival time (RMST), partial likelihood and c-index were calculated as metrics for performance evaluation. Univariable and multivariable analysis were used to identify prognostic factors for OS. RESULTS The median OS of the whole cohort was 15.8 months (95% C.I.: 13.4-20.1). All prognostic scores performed well in separating patients into different prognostic groups. RPA achieved the highest c-index, whereas GGS achieved highest partial likelihood with evaluation in the total cohort. With incorporation of the laboratory scores the recently suggested EC-GPA achieved highest c-index and highest partial likelihood. A prognostic score solely based on the assessment of performance status achieved considerable high performance as either 3- or 4-tiered score. Multivariable analysis revealed performance status, systemic disease status and laboratory parameters to be significantly associated with OS among variates included in prognostic scores. CONCLUSION Although recent PS incorporating laboratory parameters show convincing performance in predicting overall survival, older scores relying on clinical parameters only are still valid and appealing as they are easier to calculate, and as overall performance is almost equal. Moreover, a score just based on performance status is not significantly inferior and should at least be assessed for informed decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Kraft
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Germany.
| | - Janita E van Timmeren
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Simon Frei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael Mayinger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Kim Borsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Corinna Kirchner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Luisa Sabrina Stark
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Stephanie Tanadini-Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Fabian Wolpert
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Henry C Woodruff
- The D-Lab, Department of Precision Medicine, GROW-School for Oncology, Maastricht
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nicolaus Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
The Clinical Frailty Scale as useful tool in patients with brain metastases. J Neurooncol 2022; 158:51-57. [PMID: 35419752 PMCID: PMC9166853 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-022-04008-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) evaluates patients' level of frailty on a scale from 1 to 9 and is commonly used in geriatric medicine, intensive care and orthopedics. The aim of our study was to reveal whether the CFS allows a reliable prediction of overall survival (OS) in patients after surgical treatment of brain metastases (BM) compared to the Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS). METHODS Patients operated for BM were included. CFS and KPS were retrospectively assessed pre- and postoperatively and at follow-up 3-6 months after resection. RESULTS 205 patients with a follow-up of 22.8 months (95% CI 18.4-27.1) were evaluated. CFS showed a median of 3 ("managing well"; IqR 2-4) at all 3 assessment-points. Median KPS was 80 preoperatively (IqR 80-90) and 90 postoperatively (IqR 80-100) as well as at follow-up after 3-6 months. CFS correlated with KPS both preoperatively (r = - 0.92; p < 0.001), postoperatively (r = - 0.85; p < 0.001) and at follow-up (r = - 0.93; p < 0.001). The CFS predicted the expected reduction of OS more reliably than the KPS at all 3 assessments. A one-point increase (worsening) of the preoperative CFS translated into a 30% additional hazard to decease (HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.15-1.46; p < 0.001). A one-point increase in postoperative and at follow-up CFS represents a 39% (HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.25-1.54; p < 0.001) and of 42% risk (HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.27-1.59; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION The CFS is a feasible, simple and reliable scoring system in patients undergoing resection of brain metastasis. The CFS 3-6 months after surgery specifies the expected OS more accurately than the KPS.
Collapse
|
43
|
Michel A, Darkwah Oppong M, Rauschenbach L, Dinger TF, Barthel L, Pierscianek D, Wrede KH, Hense J, Pöttgen C, Junker A, Schmidt T, Iannaccone A, Kimmig R, Sure U, Jabbarli R. Prediction of Short and Long Survival after Surgery for Breast Cancer Brain Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14061437. [PMID: 35326590 PMCID: PMC8946189 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14061437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Brain metastases requiring surgical treatment determine the prognosis of patients with breast cancer. We aimed to develop the scores for the prediction of short (<6 months) and long (≥3 years) survival after BCBM surgery. Methods: Female patients with BCBM surgery between 2008 and 2019 were included. The new scores were constructed upon independent predictors for short and long postoperative survival. Results: In the final cohort (n = 95), 18 (18.9%) and 22 (23.2%) patients experienced short and long postoperative survival, respectively. Breast-preserving surgery, presence of multiple brain metastases and age ≥ 65 years at breast cancer diagnosis were identified as independent predictors of short postoperative survival. In turn, positive HER2 receptor status in brain metastases, time interval ≥ 3 years between breast cancer and brain metastases diagnosis and KPS ≥ 90% independently predicted long survival. The appropriate short and long survival scores showed higher diagnostic accuracy for the prediction of short (AUC = 0.773) and long (AUC = 0.775) survival than the breast Graded Prognostic Assessment score (AUC = 0.498/0.615). A cumulative survival score (total score) showed significant association with overall survival (p = 0.001). Conclusion: We identified predictors independently impacting the prognosis after BCBM surgery. After external validation, the presented scores might become useful tools for the selection of proper candidates for BCBM surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Michel
- Department of Neurosurgery and Spine Surgery, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (M.D.O.); (L.R.); (T.F.D.); (L.B.); (D.P.); (K.H.W.); (U.S.); (R.J.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-201-723-1230; Fax: +49-201-723-1220
| | - Marvin Darkwah Oppong
- Department of Neurosurgery and Spine Surgery, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (M.D.O.); (L.R.); (T.F.D.); (L.B.); (D.P.); (K.H.W.); (U.S.); (R.J.)
| | - Laurèl Rauschenbach
- Department of Neurosurgery and Spine Surgery, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (M.D.O.); (L.R.); (T.F.D.); (L.B.); (D.P.); (K.H.W.); (U.S.); (R.J.)
| | - Thiemo Florin Dinger
- Department of Neurosurgery and Spine Surgery, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (M.D.O.); (L.R.); (T.F.D.); (L.B.); (D.P.); (K.H.W.); (U.S.); (R.J.)
| | - Lennart Barthel
- Department of Neurosurgery and Spine Surgery, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (M.D.O.); (L.R.); (T.F.D.); (L.B.); (D.P.); (K.H.W.); (U.S.); (R.J.)
| | - Daniela Pierscianek
- Department of Neurosurgery and Spine Surgery, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (M.D.O.); (L.R.); (T.F.D.); (L.B.); (D.P.); (K.H.W.); (U.S.); (R.J.)
| | - Karsten H. Wrede
- Department of Neurosurgery and Spine Surgery, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (M.D.O.); (L.R.); (T.F.D.); (L.B.); (D.P.); (K.H.W.); (U.S.); (R.J.)
| | - Jörg Hense
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany;
| | - Christoph Pöttgen
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany;
| | - Andreas Junker
- Department of Neuropathology, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany;
| | - Teresa Schmidt
- Department of Neurooncology, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany;
| | - Antonella Iannaccone
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (A.I.); (R.K.)
| | - Rainer Kimmig
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (A.I.); (R.K.)
| | - Ulrich Sure
- Department of Neurosurgery and Spine Surgery, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (M.D.O.); (L.R.); (T.F.D.); (L.B.); (D.P.); (K.H.W.); (U.S.); (R.J.)
| | - Ramazan Jabbarli
- Department of Neurosurgery and Spine Surgery, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (M.D.O.); (L.R.); (T.F.D.); (L.B.); (D.P.); (K.H.W.); (U.S.); (R.J.)
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Kim JH, Choi JW, Kong DS, Seol HJ, Nam DH, Ryu JW, Kim ST, Suh YL, Lee JI. Histopathology and surgical outcome of symptomatic treatment-related changes after gamma knife radiosurgery in patients with brain metastases. Sci Rep 2022; 12:3013. [PMID: 35194082 PMCID: PMC8863779 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-06881-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2021] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
A late-onset treatment-related changes (TRCs), which represent radiographic radiation necrosis (RN), frequently occur after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases and often need surgical treatment. This study aimed to validate the true pathology and investigate clinical implication of surgically resected TRCs on advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Retrospective analyses of 86 patients who underwent surgical resection after radiosurgery of brain metastases were performed. Fifty-four patients displayed TRCs on preoperative MRI, comprising pure RN in 19 patients (TRC-RN group) and mixed viable tumor cells in 35 patients (TRC-PD group). Thirty-two patients revealed the consistent diagnosis of progressive disease in both MRI and histopathology (PD–PD group). The TRC-PD group showed larger prescription isodose volume (9.4 cm3) than the TRC-RN (4.06 cm3, p = 0.014) group and a shorter time interval from SRS to preoperative MRI diagnosis (median 4.07 months) than the PD–PD group (median 8.77 months, p = 0.004). Progression-free survival was significantly different among the three groups (p < 0.001), but not between TRC-RN and TRC-PD (post hoc test, p = 1.00), while no difference was observed in overall survival (p = 0.067). Brain metastases featured as TRCs after SRS frequently contained viable tumor cells. However, this histologic heterogeneity had a minor impact on benign local prognosis of TRCs after surgical resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeong-Hwa Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, South Korea
| | - Jung-Won Choi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, South Korea
| | - Doo-Sik Kong
- Department of Neurosurgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, South Korea
| | - Ho Jun Seol
- Department of Neurosurgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, South Korea
| | - Do-Hyun Nam
- Department of Neurosurgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, South Korea
| | - Jae-Wook Ryu
- Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sung-Tae Kim
- Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Yeon-Lim Suh
- Department of Pathology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jung-Il Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
The Usefulness of Prognostic Tools in Breast Cancer Patients with Brain Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14051099. [PMID: 35267407 PMCID: PMC8909185 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14051099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Revised: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Due to the variability of an individual’s prognosis and the variety of treatment options available to breast cancer (BC) patients with brain metastases (BM), establishing the proper therapy is challenging. Since 1997, several prognostic tools for BC patients with BM have been proposed with variable precision in determining the overall survival. The majority of prognostic tools include the performance status, the age at BM diagnosis, the number of BM, the primary tumor phenotype/genotype and the extracranial metastases status as an outcome of systemic therapy efficacy. It is necessary to update the prognostic indices used by physicians as advances in local and systemic treatments develop and change the parameters of survival. Free access to prognostic tools online may increase their routine adoption in clinical practice. Clinical trials on BC patients with BM remains a broad field for the application of prognostic tools. Abstract Background: Determining the proper therapy is challenging in breast cancer (BC) patients with brain metastases (BM) due to the variability of an individual’s prognosis and the variety of treatment options available. Several prognostic tools for BC patients with BM have been proposed. Our review summarizes the current knowledge on this topic. Methods: We searched PubMed for prognostic tools concerning BC patients with BM, published from January 1997 (since the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group developed) to December 2021. Our criteria were limited to adults with newly diagnosed BM regardless of the presence or absence of any leptomeningeal metastases. Results: 31 prognostic tools were selected: 13 analyzed mixed cohorts with some BC cases and 18 exclusively analyzed BC prognostic tools. The majority of prognostic tools in BC patients with BM included: the performance status, the age at BM diagnosis, the number of BM (rarely the volume), the primary tumor phenotype/genotype and the extracranial metastasis status as a result of systemic therapy. The prognostic tools differed in their specific cut-off values. Conclusion: Prognostic tools have variable precision in determining the survival of BC patients with BM. Advances in local and systemic treatment significantly affect survival, therefore, it is necessary to update the survival indices used depending on the type and period of treatment.
Collapse
|
46
|
Insights into the Steps of Breast Cancer-Brain Metastases Development: Tumor Cell Interactions with the Blood-Brain Barrier. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23031900. [PMID: 35163822 PMCID: PMC8836543 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23031900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Revised: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/05/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Brain metastases (BM) represent a growing problem for breast cancer (BC) patients. Recent studies have demonstrated a strong impact of the BC molecular subtype on the incidence of BM development. This study explores the interaction between BC cells of different molecular subtypes and the blood–brain barrier (BBB). We compared the ability of BC cells of different molecular subtypes to overcome several steps (adhesion to the brain endothelium, disruption of the BBB, and invasion through the endothelial layer) during cerebral metastases formation, in vitro as well as in vivo. Further, the impact of these cells on the BBB was deciphered at the molecular level by transcriptome analysis of the triple-negative (TNBC) cells themselves as well as of hBMECs after cocultivation with BC cell secretomes. Compared to luminal BC cells, TNBC cells have a greater ability to influence the BBB in vitro and consequently develop BM in vivo. The brain-seeking subline and parental TNBC cells behaved similarly in terms of adhesion, whereas the first showed a stronger impact on the brain endothelium integrity and increased invasive ability. The comparative transcriptome revealed potential brain-metastatic-specific key regulators involved in the aforementioned processes, e.g., the angiogenesis-related factors TNXIP and CXCL1. In addition, the transcriptomes of the two TNBC cell lines strongly differed in certain angiogenesis-associated factors and in several genes related to cell migration and invasion. Based on the present study, we hypothesize that the tumor cell’s ability to disrupt the BBB via angiogenesis activation, together with increased cellular motility, is required for BC cells to overcome the BBB and develop brain metastases.
Collapse
|
47
|
Kalita-de Croft P, Joshi V, Saunus JM, Lakhani SR. Emerging Biomarkers for Diagnosis, Prevention and Treatment of Brain Metastases-From Biology to Clinical Utility. Diseases 2022; 10:11. [PMID: 35225863 PMCID: PMC8884016 DOI: 10.3390/diseases10010011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Revised: 01/18/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Primary malignancies of the lung, skin (melanoma), and breast have higher propensity for metastatic spread to the brain. Advances in molecular tumour profiling have aided the development of targeted therapies, stereotactic radiotherapy, and immunotherapy, which have led to some improvement in patient outcomes; however, the overall prognosis remains poor. Continued research to identify new prognostic and predictive biomarkers is necessary to further impact patient outcomes, as this will enable better risk stratification at the point of primary cancer diagnosis, earlier detection of metastatic deposits (for example, through surveillance), and more effective systemic treatments. Brain metastases exhibit considerable inter- and intratumoural heterogeneity-apart from distinct histology, treatment history and other clinical factors, the metastatic brain tumour microenvironment is incredibly variable both in terms of subclonal diversity and cellular composition. This review discusses emerging biomarkers; specifically, the biological context and potential clinical utility of tumour tissue biomarkers, circulating tumour cells, extracellular vesicles, and circulating tumour DNA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Priyakshi Kalita-de Croft
- UQ Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland Faculty of Medicine, Herston, QLD 4029, Australia; (V.J.); (J.M.S.)
| | - Vaibhavi Joshi
- UQ Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland Faculty of Medicine, Herston, QLD 4029, Australia; (V.J.); (J.M.S.)
| | - Jodi M. Saunus
- UQ Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland Faculty of Medicine, Herston, QLD 4029, Australia; (V.J.); (J.M.S.)
| | - Sunil R. Lakhani
- UQ Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland Faculty of Medicine, Herston, QLD 4029, Australia; (V.J.); (J.M.S.)
- Pathology Queensland, The Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital Herston, Herston, QLD 4029, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Radiographic markers of breast cancer brain metastases: relation to clinical characteristics and postoperative outcome. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2022; 164:439-449. [PMID: 34677686 PMCID: PMC8854251 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-021-05026-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2021] [Accepted: 10/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Objective Occurrence of brain metastases BM is associated with poor prognosis in patients with breast cancer (BC). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the standard of care in the diagnosis of BM and determines further treatment strategy. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the association between the radiographic markers of BCBM on MRI with other patients’ characteristics and overall survival (OS). Methods We included 88 female patients who underwent BCBM surgery in our institution from 2008 to 2019. Data on demographic, clinical, and histopathological characteristics of the patients and postoperative survival were collected from the electronic health records. Radiographic features of BM were assessed upon the preoperative MRI. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed. Results The median OS was 17 months. Of all evaluated radiographic markers of BCBM, only the presence of necrosis was independently associated with OS (14.5 vs 22.5 months, p = 0.027). In turn, intra-tumoral necrosis was more often in individuals with shorter time interval between BC and BM diagnosis (< 3 years, p = 0.035) and preoperative leukocytosis (p = 0.022). Moreover, dural affection of BM was more common in individuals with positive human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status (p = 0.015) and supratentorial BM location (p = 0.024). Conclusion Intra-tumoral necrosis demonstrated significant association with OS after BM surgery in patients with BC. The radiographic pattern of BM on the preoperative MRI depends on certain tumor and clinical characteristics of patients. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00701-021-05026-4.
Collapse
|
49
|
Ganz JC. Cerebral metastases. PROGRESS IN BRAIN RESEARCH 2022; 268:229-258. [PMID: 35074082 DOI: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2021.10.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Brain metastases are common and deadly. Over the last 25 years GKNS has been established as an invaluable treatment. It may be used as a primary treatment or after either surgery or WBRT. Patients are assessed using one of a number of available scales. GKNS may be repeated for new metastases and for unresponsive tumors. Prescription doses are usually between 18 and 20Gy. The use of advanced MR techniques to highlight sensitive structures like the hippocampi have extended the efficacy of the treatment. More recently GKNS has been used with different target therapies with improved results. More recently frameless treatments have become more popular in this group of very sick patients. GKNS controls tumors in between 80% and over 95% of cases and may even be used for brainstem tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy C Ganz
- Department of Neurosurgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Kadamkulam Syriac A, Nandu NS, Leone JP. Central Nervous System Metastases from Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Current Treatments and Future Prospective. BREAST CANCER (DOVE MEDICAL PRESS) 2022; 14:1-13. [PMID: 35046721 PMCID: PMC8760391 DOI: 10.2147/bctt.s274514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Accepted: 12/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
It is estimated that approximately one-third of patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) will develop brain metastases. The prognosis for patients with breast cancer brain metastasis has improved in the recent past, especially for hormone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER) positive subtypes. However, the overall survival rate for patients with triple-negative subtype remains poor. The development of newer treatment options, including antibody-drug conjugates such as Sacituzumab govitecan, is particularly encouraging. This article reviews the clinical outcomes, challenges, and current approach to the treatment of brain metastasis in TNBC. We have also briefly discussed newer treatment options and ongoing clinical trials. The development of brain metastasis significantly decreases the quality of life of patients with TNBC, and newer treatment strategies and therapeutics are the need of the hour for this disease subgroup.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nitish Singh Nandu
- Department of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center/ Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Jose Pablo Leone
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| |
Collapse
|