1
|
Shah S, Saravanakumar S, Conroy D, Sowmiyanarayanan S, Singh R, Pepin A, Rashid H, Danner MT, Krishnan P, Lei S, Rashid A, Suy S, Kataria S, Aghdam N, Collins S. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer in Men With Hip Prostheses: A Cautionary Note. Cureus 2024; 16:e61432. [PMID: 38947568 PMCID: PMC11214744 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.61432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/31/2024] [Indexed: 07/02/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has been established as a safe and effective treatment for prostate cancer. SBRT requires high accuracy to reduce treatment margins. Metal hip prostheses create artifacts that distort pelvic imaging and potentially decrease the accuracy of target/organ at risk (OAR) identification and radiation dose calculations. Data on the safety and efficacy of SBRT after hip replacement is limited. This single-institution study sought to evaluate the safety and local control following SBRT for prostate cancer in men with hip replacements. METHODS 23 patients treated with localized prostate cancer and a history of pre-treatment hip replacement, treated with SBRT from 2007 to 2017 at MedStar Georgetown University Hospital were included in this retrospective analysis. Treatment was administered with the CyberKnife® (Accuray Incorporated, Sunnyvale, CA) at doses of 35 Gy or 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions. The targets and OARs were identified and contoured by a single experienced Radiation Oncologist (SPC). The adequacy of the CT and T2W MRI images for treatment planning was assessed with a three-point scale (good, adequate, or suboptimal). During treatment planning, care was taken to avoid treatment beams that directly traversed the hip prosthesis. Toxicities were recorded and scored using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 (CTCAE v.4.0). Local recurrence was confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging and/or prostate biopsy. RESULTS The median follow-up was seven years. The patients were elderly (median age = 71 years) with a high rate of comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index > 2 in 25%). Four patients had bilateral hip replacements. The majority of patients were low to intermediate risk per the D'Amico classification. Around 13% received upfront ADT. In total, 13 patients were treated with 35 Gy, and 10 were treated with 36.25 Gy. The rates of late > Grade 3 GU toxicity and > Grade 2 GI toxicity were 8.6% and 4.3%, respectively. There were no Grade 4 or 5 toxicities. Six patients (26%) developed a local recurrence at a median time of 7.5 years. Of these six patients, four had unilateral hip replacements and two had bilateral. Three underwent salvage cryotherapy and three received salvage ADT. CONCLUSIONS In the general population, high-grade toxicities and local recurrences are uncommon following prostate SBRT. However, in this cohort of patients with prior hip replacements, prostate SBRT had higher than expected rates of late toxicity and local recurrence. In the opinion of the authors, such patients should be counseled regarding an elevated risk of late toxicity and local recurrence with prostate SBRT. With its ultrasound guidance, brachytherapy would have the advantage of circumventing the need for MRI/CT-based imaging and thus may represent a preferable radiation alternative in this patient population. If these patients are treated with SBRT, they should be monitored closely for local recurrence so early salvage can be performed. We hope that recent advances in metal artifact reduction techniques and dose-calculation algorithms will improve future outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarthak Shah
- Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, USA
| | | | - Dylan Conroy
- Radiation Oncology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, USA
| | | | - Rahul Singh
- College of Arts and Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, USA
| | - Abigail Pepin
- Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Harris Rashid
- Radiation Oncology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, USA
| | - Malika T Danner
- Radiation Oncology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, USA
| | - Pranay Krishnan
- Radiology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, USA
| | - Siyuan Lei
- Radiation Oncology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, USA
| | - Abdul Rashid
- Radiation Oncology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, USA
| | - Simeng Suy
- Radiation Oncology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, USA
| | - Shaan Kataria
- Radiation Oncology, Arlington Radiation Oncology, Reston, USA
| | - Nima Aghdam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Sean Collins
- Radiation Oncology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vagni M, Tran HE, Catucci F, Chiloiro G, D’Aviero A, Re A, Romano A, Boldrini L, Kawula M, Lombardo E, Kurz C, Landry G, Belka C, Indovina L, Gambacorta MA, Cusumano D, Placidi L. Impact of bias field correction on 0.35 T pelvic MR images: evaluation on generative adversarial network-based OARs' auto-segmentation and visual grading assessment. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1294252. [PMID: 38606108 PMCID: PMC11007142 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1294252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided radiotherapy enables adaptive treatment plans based on daily anatomical changes and accurate organ visualization. However, the bias field artifact can compromise image quality, affecting diagnostic accuracy and quantitative analyses. This study aims to assess the impact of bias field correction on 0.35 T pelvis MRIs by evaluating clinical anatomy visualization and generative adversarial network (GAN) auto-segmentation performance. Materials and methods 3D simulation MRIs from 60 prostate cancer patients treated on MR-Linac (0.35 T) were collected and preprocessed with the N4ITK algorithm for bias field correction. A 3D GAN architecture was trained, validated, and tested on 40, 10, and 10 patients, respectively, to auto-segment the organs at risk (OARs) rectum and bladder. The GAN was trained and evaluated either with the original or the bias-corrected MRIs. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95th) were computed for the segmented volumes of each patient. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test assessed the statistical difference of the metrics within OARs, both with and without bias field correction. Five radiation oncologists blindly scored 22 randomly chosen patients in terms of overall image quality and visibility of boundaries (prostate, rectum, bladder, seminal vesicles) of the original and bias-corrected MRIs. Bennett's S score and Fleiss' kappa were used to assess the pairwise interrater agreement and the interrater agreement among all the observers, respectively. Results In the test set, the GAN trained and evaluated on original and bias-corrected MRIs showed DSC/HD95th of 0.92/5.63 mm and 0.92/5.91 mm for the bladder and 0.84/10.61 mm and 0.83/9.71 mm for the rectum. No statistical differences in the distribution of the evaluation metrics were found neither for the bladder (DSC: p = 0.07; HD95th: p = 0.35) nor for the rectum (DSC: p = 0.32; HD95th: p = 0.63). From the clinical visual grading assessment, the bias-corrected MRI resulted mostly in either no change or an improvement of the image quality and visualization of the organs' boundaries compared with the original MRI. Conclusion The bias field correction did not improve the anatomy visualization from a clinical point of view and the OARs' auto-segmentation outputs generated by the GAN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marica Vagni
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Huong Elena Tran
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Giuditta Chiloiro
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Angela Romano
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Boldrini
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Kawula
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Elia Lombardo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christopher Kurz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Guillaume Landry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, A Partnership Between DKFZ and LMU University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Luca Indovina
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Antonietta Gambacorta
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Davide Cusumano
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Placidi
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Oar B, Brown A, Newman G, Boles A, Rumley CN, Doyle R, Baines J, Tan A. Improvement in male pelvis magnetic resonance image contouring following radiologist-delivered training. J Med Radiat Sci 2024; 71:114-122. [PMID: 37740640 PMCID: PMC10920942 DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/24/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The magnetic resonance linear accelerator (MRL) combines both magnetic resonance imaging and a linear accelerator, allowing for daily treatment adaptation. This study aimed to assess the impact of radiologist-delivered training in magnetic resonance (MR) contouring of relevant structures within the male pelvis. METHODS Two radiation oncologists, two radiation oncology registrars and seven radiation therapists completed contouring on 10 male pelvis MR datasets both pre- and post-training. A 2-hour MR anatomy training session was delivered by a radiologist, who also provided the 'gold standard' contours. The pre- and post-training contours were compared against the gold standard with Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distances calculated; and the pre- and post-confidence scores and timing were compared. RESULTS The improvement in DSC were significant in prostate, rectum and seminal vesicles, with a post-training median DSC of 0.87 ± 0.06, 0.92 ± 0.04 and 0.80 ± 0.14, respectively. The median Hausdorff improved with a median of 1.46 ± 0.78 mm, 0.52 ± 0.32 mm and 1.11 ± 0.86 mm for prostate, rectum and seminal vesicles, respectively. Bladder concordance was high both pre- and post-training. Urethra contours improved post-training, however, remained difficult to contour with a median post-DSC of 0.51 ± 0.24. Overall, confidence scoring improved (P < 0.001) and timing decreased by an average of 4.4 ± 16.4 min post-training. CONCLUSION Radiologist-delivered training improved concordance of male pelvis contouring on MR datasets. Further work is required in the identification of urethra on MRs. These findings are of importance in the MRL adaptive workflow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bronwyn Oar
- Townsville University HospitalTownsvilleQueenslandAustralia
| | - Amy Brown
- Townsville University HospitalTownsvilleQueenslandAustralia
- Queensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
- James Cook UniversityTownsvilleQueenslandAustralia
| | - Glen Newman
- Townsville University HospitalTownsvilleQueenslandAustralia
| | - Alan Boles
- Queensland XRayTownsvilleQueenslandAustralia
| | - Christopher N. Rumley
- Townsville University HospitalTownsvilleQueenslandAustralia
- James Cook UniversityTownsvilleQueenslandAustralia
| | - Rachel Doyle
- Townsville University HospitalTownsvilleQueenslandAustralia
| | - John Baines
- Townsville University HospitalTownsvilleQueenslandAustralia
- James Cook UniversityTownsvilleQueenslandAustralia
| | - Alex Tan
- Townsville University HospitalTownsvilleQueenslandAustralia
- James Cook UniversityTownsvilleQueenslandAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Winter JD, Reddy V, Li W, Craig T, Raman S. Impact of technological advances in treatment planning, image guidance, and treatment delivery on target margin design for prostate cancer radiotherapy: an updated review. Br J Radiol 2024; 97:31-40. [PMID: 38263844 PMCID: PMC11027310 DOI: 10.1093/bjr/tqad041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2023] [Revised: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Recent innovations in image guidance, treatment delivery, and adaptive radiotherapy (RT) have created a new paradigm for planning target volume (PTV) margin design for patients with prostate cancer. We performed a review of the recent literature on PTV margin selection and design for intact prostate RT, excluding post-operative RT, brachytherapy, and proton therapy. Our review describes the increased focus on prostate and seminal vesicles as heterogenous deforming structures with further emergence of intra-prostatic GTV boost and concurrent pelvic lymph node treatment. To capture recent innovations, we highlight the evolution in cone beam CT guidance, and increasing use of MRI for improved target delineation and image registration and supporting online adaptive RT. Moreover, we summarize new and evolving image-guidance treatment platforms as well as recent reports of novel immobilization strategies and motion tracking. Our report also captures recent implementations of artificial intelligence to support image guidance and adaptive RT. To characterize the clinical impact of PTV margin changes via model-based risk estimates and clinical trials, we highlight recent high impact reports. Our report focusses on topics in the context of PTV margins but also showcase studies attempting to move beyond the PTV margin recipes with robust optimization and probabilistic planning approaches. Although guidelines exist for target margins conventional using CT-based image guidance, further validation is required to understand the optimal margins for online adaptation either alone or combined with real-time motion compensation to minimize systematic and random uncertainties in the treatment of patients with prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeff D Winter
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1P5, Canada
| | - Varun Reddy
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
| | - Winnie Li
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1P5, Canada
| | - Tim Craig
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1P5, Canada
| | - Srinivas Raman
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1P5, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ng Wei Siang K, Both S, Oldehinkel E, Langendijk JA, Wagenaar D. Assessment of residual geometrical errors of clinical target volumes and their impact on dose accumulation for head and neck radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2023; 188:109856. [PMID: 37597803 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2023] [Revised: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the residual geometrical errors (dr) and their impact on the clinical target volumes (CTV) dose coverage for head and neck cancer (HNC) proton therapy patients. METHODS We analysed 28 HNC patients treated with 70 Gy (RBE) and 54.25 Gy (RBE) to the therapeutic CTV70 and prophylactic CTV54.25, respectively. Daily cone beam CTs were converted to high quality synthetic CTs (sCTs). The CTVs from the nominal CT were propagated to the corresponding sCTs using a hybrid deformable image registration (propagated CTVs) in RayStation 11B. For 11 patients, all propagated CTVs were reviewed by our HNC radiation oncologist (physician corrected CTVs). The residual geometrical error dr was quantified as a function of the daily CTVs volume overlap with the nominal plan CTV. The errors dr(propagated CTVs) and dr(physician corrected CTVs) and the difference in dice similarity coefficients (ΔDSC) were determined. Using clinical plans, dose coverage and the tumor control probability (TCP) for the nominal, accumulated and voxel-wise minimum scenarios were determined. RESULTS The difference in the residual geometrical error dr (propagated CTVs - physician corrected CTVs) and mean DSC (|ΔDSC|mean) were minor: Δdr(CTV70) = 0.16 mm, Δdr(CTV54.25) = 0.26 mm, |ΔDSC|mean < 0.9%. For all 28 patients, dr(CTV70) = 1.91 mm and dr(CTV54.25) = 1.90 mm. However, CTV54.25 above and below the cricoid cartilage differed substantially (1.00 mm c.f. 3.93 mm). The CTV54.25 coverage below the cricoid was then almost always lower, although the TCP of the accumulated dose was higher than the TCP of the voxel-wise minimum dose. CONCLUSIONS Setup uncertainty setting of 2 mm is possible. The feasibility of using propagated CTVs for error determination is demonstrated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelvin Ng Wei Siang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands; Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands; Holland Proton Therapy Center, Department of Medical Physics & Informatics, Delft, The Netherlands.
| | - Stefan Both
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Edwin Oldehinkel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes A Langendijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk Wagenaar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sanders JW, Tang C, Kudchadker RJ, Venkatesan AM, Mok H, Hanania AN, Thames HD, Bruno TL, Starks C, Santiago E, Cunningham M, Frank SJ. Uncertainty in magnetic resonance imaging-based prostate postimplant dosimetry: Results of a 10-person human observer study, and comparisons with automatic postimplant dosimetry. Brachytherapy 2023; 22:822-832. [PMID: 37716820 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2023.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Revised: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 09/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Uncertainties in postimplant quality assessment (QA) for low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (LDRPBT) are introduced at two steps: seed localization and contouring. We quantified how interobserver variability (IoV) introduced in both steps impacts dose-volume-histogram (DVH) parameters for MRI-based LDRPBT, and compared it with automatically derived DVH parameters. METHODS AND MATERIALS Twenty-five patients received MRI-based LDRPBT. Seven clinical observers contoured the prostate and four organs at risk, and 4 dosimetrists performed seed localization, on each MRI. Twenty-eight unique manual postimplant QAs were created for each patient from unique observer pairs. Reference QA and automatic QA were also performed for each patient. IoV of prostate, rectum, and external urinary sphincter (EUS) DVH parameters owing to seed localization and contouring was quantified with coefficients of variation. Automatically derived DVH parameters were compared with those of the reference plans. RESULTS Coefficients of variation (CoVs) owing to contouring variability (CoVcontours) were significantly higher than those due to seed localization variability (CoVseeds) (median CoVcontours vs. median CoVseeds: prostate D90-15.12% vs. 0.65%, p < 0.001; prostate V100-5.36% vs. 0.37%, p < 0.001; rectum V100-79.23% vs. 8.69%, p < 0.001; EUS V200-107.74% vs. 21.18%, p < 0.001). CoVcontours were lower when the contouring observers were restricted to the 3 radiation oncologists, but were still markedly higher than CoVseeds. Median differences in prostate D90, prostate V100, rectum V100, and EUS V200 between automatically computed and reference dosimetry parameters were 3.16%, 1.63%, -0.00 mL, and -0.00 mL, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Seed localization introduces substantially less variability in postimplant QA than does contouring for MRI-based LDRPBT. While automatic seed localization may potentially help improve workflow efficiency, it has limited potential for improving the consistency and quality of postimplant dosimetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremiah W Sanders
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| | - Chad Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Rajat J Kudchadker
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Aradhana M Venkatesan
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Henry Mok
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Howard D Thames
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Teresa L Bruno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Christine Starks
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Edwin Santiago
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Mandy Cunningham
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Steven J Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Thulasi Seetha S, Garanzini E, Tenconi C, Marenghi C, Avuzzi B, Catanzaro M, Stagni S, Villa S, Chiorda BN, Badenchini F, Bertocchi E, Sanduleanu S, Pignoli E, Procopio G, Valdagni R, Rancati T, Nicolai N, Messina A. Stability of Multi-Parametric Prostate MRI Radiomic Features to Variations in Segmentation. J Pers Med 2023; 13:1172. [PMID: 37511785 PMCID: PMC10381192 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13071172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Revised: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Stability analysis remains a fundamental step in developing a successful imaging biomarker to personalize oncological strategies. This study proposes an in silico contour generation method for simulating segmentation variations to identify stable radiomic features. Ground-truth annotation provided for the whole prostate gland on the multi-parametric MRI sequences (T2w, ADC, and SUB-DCE) were perturbed to mimic segmentation differences observed among human annotators. In total, we generated 15 synthetic contours for a given image-segmentation pair. One thousand two hundred twenty-four unfiltered/filtered radiomic features were extracted applying Pyradiomics, followed by stability assessment using ICC(1,1). Stable features identified in the internal population were then compared with an external population to discover and report robust features. Finally, we also investigated the impact of a wide range of filtering strategies on the stability of features. The percentage of unfiltered (filtered) features that remained robust subjected to segmentation variations were T2w-36% (81%), ADC-36% (94%), and SUB-43% (93%). Our findings suggest that segmentation variations can significantly impact radiomic feature stability but can be mitigated by including pre-filtering strategies as part of the feature extraction pipeline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sithin Thulasi Seetha
- Prostate Cancer Program, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; (S.T.S.); (R.V.)
- Department of Precision Medicine, GROW—School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, 6211 LK Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Enrico Garanzini
- Department of Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; (E.G.); (A.M.)
| | - Chiara Tenconi
- Department of Medical Physics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy;
- Department of Oncology and Hematooncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Cristina Marenghi
- Unit of Genito-Urinary Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; (C.M.); (F.B.); (E.B.); (G.P.)
| | - Barbara Avuzzi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; (B.A.); (S.V.); (B.N.C.)
| | - Mario Catanzaro
- Department of Urology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; (M.C.); (S.S.); (N.N.)
| | - Silvia Stagni
- Department of Urology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; (M.C.); (S.S.); (N.N.)
| | - Sergio Villa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; (B.A.); (S.V.); (B.N.C.)
| | - Barbara Noris Chiorda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; (B.A.); (S.V.); (B.N.C.)
| | - Fabio Badenchini
- Unit of Genito-Urinary Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; (C.M.); (F.B.); (E.B.); (G.P.)
| | - Elena Bertocchi
- Unit of Genito-Urinary Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; (C.M.); (F.B.); (E.B.); (G.P.)
| | - Sebastian Sanduleanu
- Department of Precision Medicine, GROW—School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, 6211 LK Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Emanuele Pignoli
- Department of Medical Physics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy;
| | - Giuseppe Procopio
- Unit of Genito-Urinary Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; (C.M.); (F.B.); (E.B.); (G.P.)
| | - Riccardo Valdagni
- Prostate Cancer Program, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; (S.T.S.); (R.V.)
- Department of Oncology and Hematooncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Tiziana Rancati
- Data Science Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Nicolai
- Department of Urology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; (M.C.); (S.S.); (N.N.)
| | - Antonella Messina
- Department of Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; (E.G.); (A.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wegener E, Samuels J, Sidhom M, Trada Y, Sridharan S, Dickson S, McLeod N, Martin JM. Virtual HDR Boost for Prostate Cancer: Rebooting a Classic Treatment Using Modern Tech. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15072018. [PMID: 37046680 PMCID: PMC10093761 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15072018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Revised: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PC) is the most common malignancy in men. Internal radiotherapy (brachytherapy) has been used to treat PC successfully for over a century. In particular, there is level-one evidence of the benefits of using brachytherapy to escalate the dose of radiotherapy compared with standard external beam radiotherapy approaches. However, the use of PC brachytherapy is declining, despite strong evidence for its improved cancer outcomes. A method using external beam radiotherapy known as virtual high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost (vHDRB) aims to noninvasively mimic a brachytherapy boost radiation dose plan. In this review, we consider the evidence supporting brachytherapy boosts for PC and the continuing evolution of vHDRB approaches, culminating in the current generation of clinical trials, which will help define the role of this emerging modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Wegener
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital, Waratah, NSW 2298, Australia
- GenesisCare, Maitland, NSW 2323, Australia
- GenesisCare, Gateshead, NSW 2290, Australia
- Correspondence:
| | - Justin Samuels
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital, Waratah, NSW 2298, Australia
| | - Mark Sidhom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
| | - Yuvnik Trada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital, Waratah, NSW 2298, Australia
| | - Swetha Sridharan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital, Waratah, NSW 2298, Australia
- GenesisCare, Gateshead, NSW 2290, Australia
| | - Samuel Dickson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital, Waratah, NSW 2298, Australia
| | - Nicholas McLeod
- Department of Urology, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, NSW 2305, Australia
| | - Jarad M. Martin
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital, Waratah, NSW 2298, Australia
- GenesisCare, Maitland, NSW 2323, Australia
- GenesisCare, Gateshead, NSW 2290, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Adair Smith G, Dunlop A, Alexander SE, Barnes H, Casey F, Chick J, Gunapala R, Herbert T, Lawes R, Mason SA, Mitchell A, Mohajer J, Murray J, Nill S, Patel P, Pathmanathan A, Sritharan K, Sundahl N, Tree AC, Westley R, Williams B, McNair HA. Evaluation of therapeutic radiographer contouring for magnetic resonance image guided online adaptive prostate radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2023; 180:109457. [PMID: 36608770 PMCID: PMC10074473 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.109457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Revised: 12/13/2022] [Accepted: 12/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The implementation of MRI-guided online adaptive radiotherapy has facilitated the extension of therapeutic radiographers' roles to include contouring, thus releasing the clinician from attending daily treatment. Following undergoing a specifically designed training programme, an online interobserver variability study was performed. MATERIALS AND METHODS 117 images from six patients treated on a MR Linac were contoured online by either radiographer or clinician and the same images contoured offline by the alternate profession. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), mean distance to agreement (MDA), Hausdorff distance (HD) and volume metrics were used to analyse contours. Additionally, the online radiographer contours and optimised plans (n = 59) were analysed using the offline clinician defined contours. After clinical implementation of radiographer contouring, target volume comparison and dose analysis was performed on 20 contours from five patients. RESULTS Comparison of the radiographers' and clinicians' contours resulted in a median (range) DSC of 0.92 (0.86 - 0.99), median (range) MDA of 0.98 mm (0.2-1.7) and median (range) HD of 6.3 mm (2.5-11.5) for all 117 fractions. There was no significant difference in volume size between the two groups. Of the 59 plans created with radiographer online contours and overlaid with clinicians' offline contours, 39 met mandatory dose constraints and 12 were acceptable because 95 % of the high dose PTV was covered by 95 % dose, or the high dose PTV was within 3 % of online plan. A clinician blindly reviewed the eight remaining fractions and, using trial quality assurance metrics, deemed all to be acceptable. Following clinical implementation of radiographer contouring, the median (range) DSC of CTV was 0.93 (0.88-1.0), median (range) MDA was 0.8 mm (0.04-1.18) and HD was 5.15 mm (2.09-8.54) respectively. Of the 20 plans created using radiographer online contours overlaid with clinicians' offline contours, 18 met the dosimetric success criteria, the remaining 2 were deemed acceptable by a clinician. CONCLUSION Radiographer and clinician prostate and seminal vesicle contours on MRI for an online adaptive workflow are comparable and produce clinically acceptable plans. Radiographer contouring for prostate treatment on a MR-linac can be effectively introduced with appropriate training and evaluation. A DSC threshold for target structures could be implemented to streamline future training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alex Dunlop
- Joint Department of Physics at the Royal Marsden and The Institute of Cancer Research, United Kingdom
| | - Sophie E Alexander
- The Institute of Cancer Research/The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Helen Barnes
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Francis Casey
- Joint Department of Physics at the Royal Marsden and The Institute of Cancer Research, United Kingdom
| | - Joan Chick
- Joint Department of Physics at the Royal Marsden and The Institute of Cancer Research, United Kingdom
| | - Ranga Gunapala
- Clinical Trials and Statistic Unit, The Institute for Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Trina Herbert
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rebekah Lawes
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah A Mason
- Joint Department of Physics at the Royal Marsden and The Institute of Cancer Research, United Kingdom
| | - Adam Mitchell
- Joint Department of Physics at the Royal Marsden and The Institute of Cancer Research, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan Mohajer
- Joint Department of Physics at the Royal Marsden and The Institute of Cancer Research, United Kingdom
| | - Julia Murray
- The Institute of Cancer Research/The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Simeon Nill
- Joint Department of Physics at the Royal Marsden and The Institute of Cancer Research, United Kingdom
| | - Priyanka Patel
- The Institute of Cancer Research/The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Angela Pathmanathan
- The Institute of Cancer Research/The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kobika Sritharan
- The Institute of Cancer Research/The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nora Sundahl
- The Institute of Cancer Research/The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alison C Tree
- The Institute of Cancer Research/The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rosalyne Westley
- The Institute of Cancer Research/The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Helen A McNair
- The Institute of Cancer Research/The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Intra- and Inter-Observer Variability of Quantitative Parameters Used in Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound of Kidneys of Healthy Cats. Animals (Basel) 2022; 12:ani12243557. [PMID: 36552476 PMCID: PMC9774712 DOI: 10.3390/ani12243557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2022] [Revised: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a non-invasive imaging technique which allows qualitative and quantitative assessment of tissue perfusion. Although CEUS offers numerous advantages, a major challenge remains the variability in tissue perfusion quantification. This study aimed to assess intra- and inter-observer variability for quantification of renal perfusion. Two observers with different levels of expertise performed a quantitative analysis of 36 renal CEUS studies, twice. The CEUS data were collected from 12 healthy cats at 3 different time points with a 7-day interval. The inter- and intra-observer agreement was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient. Within and between observers, a good agreement was demonstrated for intensity-related parameters in the cortex, medulla, and interlobular artery. For some parameters, ICCinter was considerably lower than ICCintra, mostly when the ROI encompassed the entire kidney or medulla. With the exception of time to peak (TTP) and mean transit time (mTTI), time-related and slope-related parameters showed poor agreement among observers. In conclusion, it may be advised against having the quantitative assessment of renal perfusion performed by different observers, especially if their experience levels differ. The cortical mTTI seemed to be the most appropriate parameter as it showed a favorable inter-observer agreement and inter-period agreement.
Collapse
|
11
|
Sanders JW, Mok H, Hanania AN, Venkatesan AM, Tang C, Bruno TL, Thames HD, Kudchadker RJ, Frank SJ. Computer-aided segmentation on MRI for prostate radiotherapy, Part I: Quantifying human interobserver variability of the prostate and organs at risk and its impact on radiation dosimetry. Radiother Oncol 2021; 169:124-131. [PMID: 34921895 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Revised: 11/13/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Quantifying the interobserver variability (IoV) of prostate and periprostatic anatomy delineation on prostate MRI is necessary to inform its use for treatment planning, treatment delivery, and treatment quality assessment. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty five prostate cancer patients underwent MRI-based low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (LDRPBT). The patients were scanned with a 3D T2-weighted sequence for treatment planning and a 3D T2/T1-weighted sequence for quality assessment. Seven observers involved with the LDRPBT workflow delineated the prostate, external urinary sphincter (EUS), seminal vesicles, rectum, and bladder on all 50 MRIs. IoV was assessed by measuring contour similarity metrics, differences in organ volumes, and differences in dosimetry parameters between unique observer pairs. Measurements from a group of 3 radiation oncologists (G1) were compared against those from a group consisting of the other 4 clinical observers (G2). RESULTS IoV of the prostate was lower for G1 than G2 (Matthew's correlation coefficient [MCC], G1 vs. G2: planning-0.906 vs. 0.870, p < 0.001; postimplant-0.899 vs. 0.861, p < 0.001). IoV of the EUS was highest of all the organs for both groups, but was lower for G1 (MCC, G1 vs. G2: planning-0.659 vs. 0.402, p < 0.001; postimplant-0.684 vs. 0.398, p < 0.001). Large differences in prostate dosimetry parameters were observed (G1 maximum absolute prostate ΔD90: planning-76.223 Gy, postimplant-36.545 Gy; G1 maximum absolute prostate ΔV100: planning-13.927%, postimplant-8.860%). CONCLUSIONS While MRI is optimal in the management of prostate cancer with radiation therapy, significant interobserver variability of the prostate and external urinary sphincter still exist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremiah W Sanders
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
| | - Henry Mok
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | | | - Aradhana M Venkatesan
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Chad Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Teresa L Bruno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Howard D Thames
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
| | - Rajat J Kudchadker
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Steven J Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Evaluation of the impact of teaching on delineation variation during a virtual stereotactic ablative radiotherapy contouring workshop. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE 2021. [DOI: 10.1017/s1460396921000583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction:
Variation in delineation of target volumes/organs at risk (OARs) is well recognised in radiotherapy and may be reduced by several methods including teaching. We evaluated the impact of teaching on contouring variation for thoracic/pelvic stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) during a virtual contouring workshop.
Materials and methods:
Target volume/OAR contours produced by workshop participants for three cases were evaluated against reference contours using DICE similarity coefficient (DSC) and line domain error (LDE) metrics. Pre- and post-workshop DSC results were compared using Wilcoxon signed ranks test to determine the impact of teaching during the workshop.
Results:
Of 50 workshop participants, paired pre- and post-workshop contours were available for 21 (42%), 20 (40%) and 22 (44%) participants for primary lung cancer, pelvic bone metastasis and pelvic node metastasis cases, respectively. Statistically significant improvements post-workshop in median DSC and LDE results were observed for 6 (50%) and 7 (58%) of 12 structures, respectively, although the magnitude of DSC/LDE improvement was modest in most cases. An increase in median DSC post-workshop ≥0·05 was only observed for GTVbone, IGTVlung and SacralPlex, and reduction in median LDE > 1 mm was only observed for GTVbone, CTVbone and SacralPlex. Post-workshop, median DSC values were >0·7 for 75% of structures. For 92% of the structures, post-workshop contours were considered to be acceptable or within acceptable variation following review by the workshop faculty.
Conclusions:
This study has demonstrated that virtual SABR contouring training is feasible and was associated with some improvements in contouring variation for multiple target volumes/OARs.
Collapse
|
13
|
Richardson M, Skehan K, Wilton L, Sams J, Samuels J, Goodwin J, Greer P, Sridharan S, Martin J. Visualising the urethra for prostate radiotherapy planning. J Med Radiat Sci 2021; 68:282-288. [PMID: 34028976 PMCID: PMC8424315 DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2020] [Accepted: 05/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The prostatic urethra is an organ at risk for prostate radiotherapy with genitourinary toxicities a common side effect. Many external beam radiation therapy protocols call for urethral sparing, and with modulated radiotherapy techniques, the radiation dose distribution can be controlled so that maximum doses do not fall within the prostatic urethral volume. Whilst traditional diagnostic MRI sequences provide excellent delineation of the prostate, uncertainty often remains as to the true path of the urethra within the gland. This study aims to assess if a high-resolution isotropic 3D T2 MRI series can reduce inter-observer variability in urethral delineation for radiotherapy planning. METHODS Five independent observers contoured the prostatic urethra for ten patients on three data sets; a 2 mm axial CT, a diagnostic 3 mm axial T2 TSE MRI and a 0.9 mm isotropic 3D T2 SPACE MRI. The observers were blinded from each other's contours. A Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) score was calculated using the intersection and union of the five observer contours vs an expert reference contour for each data set. RESULTS The mean DSC of the observer vs reference contours was 0.47 for CT, 0.62 for T2 TSE and 0.78 for T2 SPACE (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The introduction of a 0.9 mm isotropic 3D T2 SPACE MRI for treatment planning provides improved urethral visualisation and can lead to a significant reduction in inter-observer variation in prostatic urethral contouring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Richardson
- Department of Radiation OncologyCalvary Mater NewcastleWaratahNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Kate Skehan
- Department of Radiation OncologyCalvary Mater NewcastleWaratahNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Lee Wilton
- Department of Radiation OncologyCalvary Mater NewcastleWaratahNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Joshua Sams
- Department of Radiation OncologyCalvary Mater NewcastleWaratahNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Justin Samuels
- Department of Radiation OncologyCalvary Mater NewcastleWaratahNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Jonathan Goodwin
- Department of Radiation OncologyCalvary Mater NewcastleWaratahNew South WalesAustralia
- School of Mathematical and Physical ScienceUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Peter Greer
- Department of Radiation OncologyCalvary Mater NewcastleWaratahNew South WalesAustralia
- School of Mathematical and Physical ScienceUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Swetha Sridharan
- Department of Radiation OncologyCalvary Mater NewcastleWaratahNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Jarad Martin
- Department of Radiation OncologyCalvary Mater NewcastleWaratahNew South WalesAustralia
- School of Medicine and Public HealthUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanNew South WalesAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Piazzese C, Evans E, Thomas B, Staffurth J, Gwynne S, Spezi E. FIELD RT: an open-source platform for the assessment of target volume delineation in radiation therapy. Br J Radiol 2021; 94:20210356. [PMID: 34289317 PMCID: PMC9328049 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20210356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: Target volume delineation (TVD) has been identified as a weakness in the accuracy of radiotherapy, both within and outside of clinical trials due to the intra/interobserver variations affecting the TVD quality. Sources of variations such as poor compliance or protocol violation may have adverse effect on treatment outcomes. In this paper, we present and describe the FIELDRT software developed for the ARENA project to improve the quality of TVD through qualitative and quantitative feedbacks and individual and personalized summary of trainee”s performance. Methods: For each site-specific clinical case included in the FIELDRT software, reference volumes, minimum and maximum “acceptable” volumes and organ at risk were derived by outlines of consultants and senior trainees. The software components currently developed include: (a) user-friendly importing interface (b) analysis toolbox to compute quantitative and qualitative (c) visualiser and (d) structured report generator for personalised feedback. The FIELDRT software was validated by comparing the performance of 63 trainees and by measuring performance over time. In addition, a trainee evaluation day was held in 2019 to collect feedback on FIELDRT. Results: Results show the trainees’ improvement when reoutlining a case after reviewing the feedback generated from the FIELDRT software. Comments and feedback received after evaluation day were positive and confirmed that FIELDRT can be a useful application for training purposes. Conclusion: We presented a new open-source software to support education in TVD and ongoing continuous professional development for clinical oncology trainees and consultants. ARENA in combination with FIELDRT implements site-specific modules with reference target and organs at risk volumes and automatically evaluates individual performance using several quantitative and qualitative feedbacks. Pilot results suggests this software could be used as an education tool to reduce variation in TVD so to guarantee high quality in radiotherapy. Advances in knowledge: FIELDRT is a new easy and free to use software aiming at supporting education in TVD and ongoing continuous professional development. The software provides quantitative/qualitative feedback and an exportable report with an individual and personalised summary of trainee’s performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Concetta Piazzese
- University of Huddersfield, School of Computing & Engineering, Huddersfield, UK.,Cardiff University, School of Engineering, Cardiff, UK.,Clinical Oncology, Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK
| | - Elin Evans
- Clinical Oncology, Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK
| | - Betsan Thomas
- Clinical Oncology, South West Wales Cancer Centre, Swansea, UK
| | | | - Sarah Gwynne
- Clinical Oncology, South West Wales Cancer Centre, Swansea, UK
| | - Emiliano Spezi
- Cardiff University, School of Engineering, Cardiff, UK.,Clinical Oncology, Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sadeghi S, Siavashpour Z, Vafaei Sadr A, Farzin M, Sharp R, Gholami S. A rapid review of influential factors and appraised solutions on organ delineation uncertainties reduction in radiotherapy. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2021; 7. [PMID: 34265746 DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ac14d0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 07/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Background and purpose.Accurate volume delineation plays an essential role in radiotherapy. Contouring is a potential source of uncertainties in radiotherapy treatment planning that could affect treatment outcomes. Therefore, reducing the degree of contouring uncertainties is crucial. The role of utilized imaging modality in the organ delineation uncertainties has been investigated. This systematic review explores the influential factors on inter-and intra-observer uncertainties of target volume and organs at risk (OARs) delineation focusing on the used imaging modality for these uncertainties reduction and the reported subsequent histopathology and follow-up assessment.Methods and materials.An inclusive search strategy has been conducted to query the available online databases (Scopus, Google Scholar, PubMed, and Medline). 'Organ at risk', 'target', 'delineation', 'uncertainties', 'radiotherapy' and their relevant terms were utilized using every database searching syntax. Final article extraction was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. Included studies were limited to the ones published in English between 1995 and 2020 and that just deal with computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) modalities.Results.A total of 923 studies were screened and 78 were included of which 31 related to the prostate 20 to the breast, 18 to the head and neck, and 9 to the brain tumor site. 98% of the extracted studies performed volumetric analysis. Only 24% of the publications reported the dose deviations resulted from variation in volume delineation Also, heterogeneity in studied populations and reported geometric and volumetric parameters were identified such that quantitative synthesis was not appropriate.Conclusion.This review highlightes the inter- and intra-observer variations that could lead to contouring uncertainties and impede tumor control in radiotherapy. For improving volume delineation and reducing inter-observer variability, the implementation of well structured training programs, homogeneity in following consensus and guidelines, reliable ground truth selection, and proper imaging modality utilization could be clinically beneficial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sogand Sadeghi
- Department of Nuclear Physics, Faculty of Sciences, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran
| | - Zahra Siavashpour
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shohada-e Tajrish Educational Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Alireza Vafaei Sadr
- Département de Physique Théorique and Center for Astroparticle Physics, Université de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Mostafa Farzin
- Radiation Oncology Research Center (RORC), Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.,Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ryan Sharp
- Department of Health Physics and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, United States of America
| | - Somayeh Gholami
- Radiotherapy Oncology Department, Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
A phantom study to contrast and compare polymer and gold fiducial markers in radiotherapy simulation imaging. Sci Rep 2021; 11:8931. [PMID: 33903651 PMCID: PMC8076319 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-88300-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
To assess visibility and artifact characteristics of polymer fiducials compared to standard gold fiducials for radiotherapy CT and MRI simulation. Three gold and three polymer fiducials were inserted into a CT and MRI tissue-equivalent phantom that approximated the prostate cancer radiotherapy configuration. The phantom and fiducials were imaged on CT and MRI. Images were assessed in terms of fiducial visibility and artifact. ImageJ was employed to quantify the pixel gray-scale of each fiducial and artifact. Fiducial gray-scale histograms and profiles were generated for analysis. Objective measurements of the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and artifact index (AI) were calculated. The CT images showed that the gold fiducials are visually brighter, with greater contrast than the polymer. The higher peak values illustrate this in the line profiles. However, they produce bright radiating and dark shadowing artifacts. This is depicted by the greater width of line profiles and the disruption of phantom area profiles. Quantitatively this results in greater percentile ranges of the histograms. Furthermore, for CT, gold had a higher CNR than polymer, relative to the phantom. However, the gold CNR and SNR were degraded by the greater artifact and thus AI. Both fiducials were visible on MRI and had similar histograms and profiles that were also reflected in comparable CNR, SNR and AI. Polymer fiducials were well visualized in a phantom on CT and MR and produce less artifact than the gold fiducials. Polymer markers could enhance the quality and accuracy of radiotherapy co-registration and planning but require clinical confirmation.
Collapse
|
17
|
Patrick HM, Souhami L, Kildea J. Reduction of inter-observer contouring variability in daily clinical practice through a retrospective, evidence-based intervention. Acta Oncol 2021; 60:229-236. [PMID: 32988249 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2020.1825801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inter-observer variations (IOVs) arising during contouring can potentially impact plan quality and patient outcomes. Regular assessment of contouring IOV is not commonly performed in clinical practice due to the large time commitment required of clinicians from conventional methods. This work uses retrospective information from past treatment plans to facilitate a time-efficient, evidence-based intervention to reduce contouring IOV. METHODS The contours of 492 prostate cancer treatment plans created by four radiation oncologists were analyzed in this study. Structure volumes, lengths, and DVHs were extracted from the treatment planning system and stratified based on primary oncologist and inclusion of a pelvic lymph node (PLN) target. Inter-observer variations and their dosimetric consequences were assessed using Student's t-tests. Results of this analysis were presented at an intervention meeting, where new consensus contour definitions were agreed upon. The impact of the intervention was assessed one-year later by repeating the analysis on 152 new plans. RESULTS Significant IOV in prostate and PLN target delineation existed pre-intervention between oncologists, impacting dose to nearby OARs. IOV was also present for rectum and penile-bulb structures. Post-intervention, IOV decreased for all previously discordant structures. Dosimetric variations were also reduced. Although target contouring concordance increased significantly, some variations still persisted for PLN structures, highlighting remaining areas for improvement. CONCLUSION We detected significant contouring IOV in routine practice using easily accessible retrospective data and successfully decreased IOV in our clinic through a reflective intervention. Continued application of this approach may aid improvements in practice standardization and enhance quality of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H. M. Patrick
- Medical Physics Unit, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - L. Souhami
- Department of Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - J. Kildea
- Medical Physics Unit, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Holyoake DLP, Robinson M, Silva M, Grose D, McIntosh D, Sebag-Montefiore D, Radhakrishna G, Mukherjee S, Hawkins MA. SPARC, a phase-I trial of pre-operative, margin intensified, stereotactic body radiation therapy for pancreatic cancer. Radiother Oncol 2021; 155:278-284. [PMID: 33217498 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2020] [Revised: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 11/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Following resection of pancreatic cancer, risk of positive margins and local recurrence remain high, especially for borderline-resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC). We aimed to establish the maximum tolerated dose of a margin-intensified five-fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) regimen designed to treat the region at risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a prospective multicentre phase-1 rolling-six dose-escalation study. BRPC patients received pre-operative SBRT, with one dose to the primary tumour and an integrated boost to the region where tumour was in contact with vasculature. Four dose-levels were proposed, with starting dose 30 Gy to primary PTV and 45 Gy to boost volume (PTV_R), in five daily fractions. Primary endpoint was maximum tolerated dose (MTD), defined as highest dose where zero of three or one of six patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). RESULTS Twelve patients were registered, eleven received SBRT. Radiotherapy was well tolerated with all treatment completed as scheduled. Dose was escalated one level up from starting dose without encountering any DLT (prescribed 32.5 Gy PTV, 47.5 Gy PTV_R). Nine serious adverse reactions or events occurred (seven CTCAE Grade 3, two Grade 4). Two patients went on to have surgical resection. Median overall survival for SBRT patients was 8.1 months. The study closed early when it was unable to recruit to schedule. CONCLUSION Toxicity of SBRT was low for the two dose-levels that were tested, but MTD was not established. Few patients subsequently underwent resection of pancreatic tumour after SBRT, and it is difficult to draw conclusions regarding the safety or toxicity of these therapies in combination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel L P Holyoake
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Maxwell Robinson
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom; CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Silva
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Derek Grose
- The Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - David McIntosh
- The Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - David Sebag-Montefiore
- University of Leeds, United Kingdom; Leeds Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospital, United Kingdom
| | | | - Somnath Mukherjee
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom; CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Maria A Hawkins
- Dept of Medical Physics & Biomedical Engineering, University College London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Tong N, Gou S, Chen S, Yao Y, Yang S, Cao M, Kishan A, Sheng K. Multi-task edge-recalibrated network for male pelvic multi-organ segmentation on CT images. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66:035001. [PMID: 33197901 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abcad9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Automated male pelvic multi-organ segmentation on CT images is highly desired for applications, including radiotherapy planning. To further improve the performance and efficiency of existing automated segmentation methods, in this study, we propose a multi-task edge-recalibrated network (MTER-Net), which aims to overcome the challenges, including blurry boundaries, large inter-patient appearance variations, and low soft-tissue contrast. The proposed MTER-Net is equipped with the following novel components. (a) To exploit the saliency and stability of femoral heads, we employed a light-weight localization module to locate the target region and efficiently remove the complex background. (b) We add an edge stream to the regular segmentation stream to focus on processing the edge-related information, distinguish the organs with blurry boundaries, and then boost the overall segmentation performance. Between the regular segmentation stream and edge stream, we introduce an edge recalibration module at each resolution level to connect the intermediate layers and deliver the higher-level activations from the regular stream to the edge stream to denoise the irrelevant activations. (c) Finally, using a 3D Atrous Spatial Pyramid Pooling (ASPP) feature fusion module, we fuse the features at different scales in the regular stream and the predictions from the edge stream to form the final segmentation result. The proposed segmentation network was evaluated on 200 prostate cancer patient CT images with manually delineated contours of bladder, rectum, seminal vesicle, and prostate. The segmentation performance of the proposed method was quantitatively evaluated using three metrics including Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), average surface distance (ASD), and 95% surface distance (95SD). The proposed MTER-Net achieves average DSC of 86.35%, ASD of 1.09 mm, and 95SD of 3.53 mm on the four organs, which outperforms the state-of-the-art segmentation networks by a large margin. Specifically, the quantitative DSC evaluation results of the four organs are 96.49% (bladder), 86.39% (rectum), 76.38% (seminal vesicle), and 86.14% (prostate), respectively. In conclusion, we demonstrate that the proposed MTER-Net efficiently attains superior performance to state-of-the-art pelvic organ segmentation methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nuo Tong
- Key Lab of Intelligent Perception and Image Understanding of Ministry of Education, Xidian University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710071, People's Republic of China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Duffton A, Li W, Forde E. The Pivotal Role of the Therapeutic Radiographer/Radiation Therapist in Image-guided Radiotherapy Research and Development. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2020; 32:852-860. [PMID: 33087296 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2020] [Revised: 08/21/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
The ability to personalise radiotherapy to fit the individual patient and their diagnosis has been realised through technological advancements. There is now more opportunity to utilise these technologies and deliver precision radiotherapy for more patients. Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) has enabled users to safely and accurately plan, treat and verify complex cases; and deliver a high dose to the target volume, while minimising dose to normal tissue. Rapid changes in IGRT have required a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach, carefully deciding optimum protocols to achieve clinical benefit. Therapeutic radiographer/radiation therapists (RTTs) play a pivotal role in this MDT. There is already a great deal of evidence that illustrates the contribution of RTTs in IGRT development; implementation; quality assurance; and maintaining training and competency programmes. Often this has required the RTT to undertake additional roles and responsibilities. These publications show how the profession has evolved, expanding the scope of practice. There are now more opportunities for RTT-led IGRT research. This is not only undertaken in the more traditional aspects of practice, but in recent times, more RTTs are becoming involved in imaging biomarkers research and radiomic analysis. The aim of this overview is to describe the RTT contribution to the ongoing development of IGRT and to showcase some of the profession's involvement in IGRT research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Duffton
- Department of Radiotherapy, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK.
| | - W Li
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - E Forde
- Applied Radiation Therapy Trinity, Discipline of Radiation Therapy, Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Christiansen RL, Dysager L, Bertelsen AS, Hansen O, Brink C, Bernchou U. Accuracy of automatic deformable structure propagation for high-field MRI guided prostate radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:32. [PMID: 32033574 PMCID: PMC7007657 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-1482-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2019] [Accepted: 01/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In this study we have evaluated the accuracy of automatic, deformable structure propagation from planning CT and MR scans for daily online plan adaptation for MR linac (MRL) treatment, which is an important element to minimize re-planning time and reduce the risk of misrepresenting the target due to this time pressure. METHODS For 12 high-risk prostate cancer patients treated to the prostate and pelvic lymph nodes, target structures and organs at risk were delineated on both planning MR and CT scans and propagated using deformable registration to three T2 weighted MR scans acquired during the treatment course. Generated structures were evaluated against manual delineations on the repeated scans using intra-observer variation obtained on the planning MR as ground truth. RESULTS MR-to-MR propagated structures had significant less median surface distance and larger Dice similarity index compared to CT-MR propagation. The MR-MR propagation uncertainty was similar in magnitude to the intra-observer variation. Visual inspection of the deformed structures revealed that small anatomical differences between organs in source and destination image sets were generally well accounted for while large differences were not. CONCLUSION Both CT and MR based propagations require manual editing, but the current results show that MR-to-MR propagated structures require fewer corrections for high risk prostate cancer patients treated at a high-field MRL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rasmus Lübeck Christiansen
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Winsløwparken 19 3. Sal, 5000, Odense C, Denmark.
- Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Kløvervænget 19, Indgang 85, Pavillion, Stuen, 5000, Odense C, Denmark.
| | - Lars Dysager
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Kløvervænget 19 Indgang 85 Pavillion, 1. sal, 5000, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Anders Smedegaard Bertelsen
- Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Kløvervænget 19, Indgang 85, Pavillion, Stuen, 5000, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Olfred Hansen
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Winsløwparken 19 3. Sal, 5000, Odense C, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Kløvervænget 19 Indgang 85 Pavillion, 1. sal, 5000, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Carsten Brink
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Winsløwparken 19 3. Sal, 5000, Odense C, Denmark
- Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Kløvervænget 19, Indgang 85, Pavillion, Stuen, 5000, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Uffe Bernchou
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Winsløwparken 19 3. Sal, 5000, Odense C, Denmark
- Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Kløvervænget 19, Indgang 85, Pavillion, Stuen, 5000, Odense C, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Depauw N, Keyriläinen J, Suilamo S, Warner L, Bzdusek K, Olsen C, Kooy H. MRI-based IMPT planning for prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 2019; 144:79-85. [PMID: 31734604 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2019] [Revised: 10/15/2019] [Accepted: 10/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Treatment planning for proton therapy requires the relative proton stopping power ratio (RSP) information of the patient for accurate dose calculations. RSP are conventionally obtained after mapping of the Hounsfield units (HU) from a calibrated patient computed tomography (CT). One or multiple CT are needed for a given treatment which represents additional, undesired dose to the patient. For prostate cancer, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans are the gold standard for segmentation while offering dose-less imaging. We here quantify the clinical applicability of converted MR images as a substitute for intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) treatment of the prostate. METHODS MRCAT (Magnetic Resonance for Calculating ATtenuation) is a Philips-developed technology which produces a synthetic CT image consisting of five HU from a specific set of MRI acquisitions. MRCAT and original planning CT data sets were obtained for ten patients. An IMPT plan was generated on the MRCAT for each patient. Plans were produced such that they fulfill the prostate protocol in use at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH). The plans were then recomputed onto the nominal planning CT for each patient. Robustness analyses (±5 mm setup shifts and ±3.5 % range uncertainties) were also performed. RESULTS Comparison of MRCAT plans and their recomputation onto the planning CT plan showed excellent agreement. Likewise, dose perturbations due to setup shifts and range uncertainties were well within clinical acceptance demonstrating the clinical viability of the approach. CONCLUSIONS This work demonstrate the clinical acceptability of substituting MR converted RSP images instead of CT for IMPT planning of prostate cancer. This further translates into higher contouring accuracy along with lesser imaging dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Depauw
- Francis H. Burr Proton Therapy Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Boston, USA.
| | - Jani Keyriläinen
- Department of Medical Physics & Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Sami Suilamo
- Department of Medical Physics & Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | | | - Karl Bzdusek
- Philips Healthcare, Philips Radiation Oncology Systems, Fitchburg, USA
| | - Christine Olsen
- Francis H. Burr Proton Therapy Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Boston, USA
| | - Hanne Kooy
- Francis H. Burr Proton Therapy Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Boston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Martin J, Keall P, Siva S, Greer P, Christie D, Moore K, Dowling J, Pryor D, Chong P, McLeod N, Raman A, Lynam J, Smart J, Oldmeadow C, Tang CI, Murphy DG, Millar J, Tai KH, Holloway L, Reeves P, Hayden A, Lim T, Holt T, Sidhom M. TROG 18.01 phase III randomised clinical trial of the Novel Integration of New prostate radiation schedules with adJuvant Androgen deprivation: NINJA study protocol. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e030731. [PMID: 31434782 PMCID: PMC6707760 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a non-invasive alternative to surgery for the treatment of non-metastatic prostate cancer (PC). The objectives of the Novel Integration of New prostate radiation schedules with adJuvant Androgen deprivation (NINJA) clinical trial are to compare two emerging SBRT regimens for efficacy with technical substudies focussing on MRI only planning and the use of knowledge-based planning (KBP) to assess radiotherapy plan quality. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Eligible patients must have biopsy-proven unfavourable intermediate or favourable high-risk PC, have an Eastern Collaborative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-1 and provide written informed consent. All patients will receive 6 months in total of androgen deprivation therapy. Patients will be randomised to one of two SBRT regimens. The first will be 40 Gy in five fractions given on alternating days (SBRT monotherapy). The second will be 20 Gy in two fractions given 1 week apart followed 2 weeks later by 36 Gy in 12 fractions given five times per week (virtual high-dose rate boost (HDRB)). The primary efficacy outcome will be biochemical clinical control at 5 years. Secondary endpoints for the initial portion of NINJA look at the transition of centres towards MRI only planning and the impact of KBP on real-time (RT) plan assessment. The first 150 men will demonstrate accrual feasibility as well as addressing the KBP and MRI planning aims, prior to proceeding with total accrual to 472 patients as a phase III randomised controlled trial. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION NINJA is a multicentre cooperative clinical trial comparing two SBRT regimens for men with PC. It builds on promising results from several single-armed studies, and explores radiation dose escalation in the Virtual HDRB arm. The initial component includes novel technical elements, and will form an important platform set for a definitive phase III study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ANZCTN 12615000223538.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jarad Martin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Paul Keall
- Radiation Physics Laboratory, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Shankar Siva
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Peter Greer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Kevin Moore
- Department of Medical Physics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Jason Dowling
- The Australian e-Health Research Centre, CSIRO, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - David Pryor
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital Health Service District, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
| | - Peter Chong
- Department of Urology, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nicholas McLeod
- Department of Urology, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Avi Raman
- Department of Urology, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| | - James Lynam
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Joanne Smart
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Colin I Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Urological Service Team, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jeremy Millar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Keen Hun Tai
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lois Holloway
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Penny Reeves
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Health Research Economics, University of Newcastle Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Amy Hayden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Tee Lim
- Genesis Care, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Tanya Holt
- Radiation Oncology Princess Alexandra Raymond Terrace, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Mark Sidhom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Wolf J, Nicholls J, Hunter P, Nguyen DT, Keall P, Martin J. Dosimetric impact of intrafraction rotations in stereotactic prostate radiotherapy: A subset analysis of the TROG 15.01 SPARK trial. Radiother Oncol 2019; 136:143-147. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.04.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2019] [Revised: 03/26/2019] [Accepted: 04/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
|
25
|
Abugideiri M, Schreibmann E, Switchenko J, McDonald MW, Beitler JJ, Curran WJ, Bruner D, Patel P, Tigeneh W, Mijena M, Tian S, Dhabaan A, Esiashvili N, Liu T, Ali AN. Prospective International Pilot Study Evaluating the Efficacy of a Self-Guided Contouring Teaching Module With Integrated Feedback for Transitioning From 2D to 3D Treatment Planning. J Glob Oncol 2019; 5:1-16. [PMID: 31082303 PMCID: PMC6550062 DOI: 10.1200/jgo.18.00224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/05/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Transitioning from two-dimensional to three-dimensional treatment planning requires developing contouring skills. Contouring atlases are excellent resources, but they do not provide users active feedback. Developing countries may not have many radiation oncologists experienced in three-dimensional planning to provide training. We sought to develop a standardized self-guided educational module with integrated feedback to teach contouring skills. METHODS AND MATERIALS All 18 oncology residents at Black Lion Hospital/Addis Ababa University in Ethiopia were trained to contour the level II lymph node station. Residents took a baseline pretest quiz, survey, and contouring evaluation. Residents then watched an instructional contouring lecture and performed three additional cases with integrated feedback by comparing their contours to gold-standard contours. Residents then took a post-training quiz, survey, and contouring evaluation. Paired t tests and analysis of variance were used for analysis. RESULTS Before training, the average number of total cases ever contoured was 2.4 and the average number of head and neck cases contoured was 0.5. Comfort with contouring improved from being "not at all comfortable" to "quite comfortable" after the 3-hour training (P < .001). The standard deviation between the resident contours and gold standard improved from 72.6 cm3 (pretest) to 7.4 cm3 (post-test). The average percentage overlap with the gold-standard contours and Dice similarity coefficient improved with each case performed, from 27.7% and 0.26 (pretest) to 80.1% and 0.77 (post-test), respectively (P < .001). After training, 16 of 18 (88.9%) residents produced a Dice similarity coefficient greater than 0.7, the threshold generally accepted for excellent agreement. CONCLUSION This self-guided teaching module was an effective tool for developing level II lymph node contouring skills by providing active feedback and resulted in improved user confidence and accuracy compared with a gold standard. This module can be expanded to other disease sites and countries to further facilitate transitioning to three-dimensional treatment planning in developing countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Deborah Bruner
- Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Pretesh Patel
- Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | | | - Miressa Mijena
- Black Lion Hospital/Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Sibo Tian
- Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Anees Dhabaan
- Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | | | - Tian Liu
- Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Arif N. Ali
- Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Roach D, Holloway LC, Jameson MG, Dowling JA, Kennedy A, Greer PB, Krawiec M, Rai R, Denham J, De Leon J, Lim K, Berry ME, White RT, Bydder SA, Tan HT, Croker JD, McGrath A, Matthews J, Smeenk RJ, Ebert MA. Multi-observer contouring of male pelvic anatomy: Highly variable agreement across conventional and emerging structures of interest. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2019; 63:264-271. [PMID: 30609205 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.12844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2018] [Accepted: 11/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study quantified inter-observer contouring variations for multiple male pelvic structures, many of which are of emerging relevance for prostate cancer radiotherapy progression and toxicity response studies. METHODS Five prostate cancer patient datasets (CT and T2-weighted MR) were distributed to 13 observers for contouring. CT structures contoured included the clinical target volume (CTV), seminal vesicles, rectum, colon, bowel bag, bladder and peri-rectal space (PRS). MR contours included CTV, trigone, membranous urethra, penile bulb, neurovascular bundle and multiple pelvic floor muscles. Contouring variations were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and multiple additional metrics. RESULTS Clinical target volume (CT and MR), bladder, rectum and PRS contours showed excellent inter-observer agreement (median ICC = 0.97; 0.99; 1.00; 0.95; 0.90, DSC = 0.83 ± 0.05; 0.88 ± 0.05; 0.93 ± 0.03; 0.81 ± 0.07; 0.80 ± 0.06, respectively). Seminal vesicle contours were more variable (ICC = 0.75, DSC = 0.73 ± 0.14), while colon and bowel bag contoured volumes were consistent (ICC = 0.97; 0.97), but displayed poor overlap (DSC = 0.58 ± 0.22; 0.67 ± 0.21). Smaller MR structures showed significant inter-observer variations, with poor overlap for trigone, membranous urethra, penile bulb, and left and right neurovascular bundles (DSC = 0.44 ± 0.22; 0.41 ± 0.21; 0.66 ± 0.21; 0.16 ± 0.17; 0.15 ± 0.15). Pelvic floor muscles recorded moderate to strong inter-observer agreement (ICC = 0.50-0.97), although large outlier variations were observed. CONCLUSIONS Inter-observer contouring variation was significant for multiple pelvic structures contoured on MR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dale Roach
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lois C Holloway
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael G Jameson
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jason A Dowling
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.,Australian e-Health Research Centre, CSIRO, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Angel Kennedy
- Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Peter B Greer
- School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.,Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michele Krawiec
- Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Robba Rai
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jim Denham
- School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jeremiah De Leon
- Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Karen Lim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, New South Wales, Australia.,South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Megan E Berry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, New South Wales, Australia.,South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rohen T White
- Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Sean A Bydder
- Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Hendrick T Tan
- Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | | | - Alycea McGrath
- Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - John Matthews
- Radiation Oncology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Robert J Smeenk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Martin A Ebert
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.,Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,School of Physics and Astrophysics, Faculty of Science, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Kumar S, Holloway L, Roach D, Pogson E, Veera J, Batumalai V, Lim K, Delaney GP, Lazarus E, Borok N, Moses D, Jameson MG, Vinod S. The impact of a radiologist-led workshop on MRI target volume delineation for radiotherapy. J Med Radiat Sci 2018; 65:300-310. [PMID: 30076690 PMCID: PMC6275253 DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2018] [Revised: 06/11/2018] [Accepted: 06/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used for target volume delineation in radiotherapy due to its superior soft tissue visualisation compared to computed tomography (CT). The aim of this study was to assess the impact of a radiologist-led workshop on inter-observer variability in volume delineation on MRI. METHODS Data from three separate studies evaluating the impact of MRI in lung, breast and cervix were collated. At pre-workshop evaluation, observers involved in each clinical site were instructed to delineate specified volumes. Radiologists specialising in each cancer site conducted an interactive workshop on interpretation of images and anatomy for each clinical site. At post-workshop evaluation, observers repeated delineation a minimum of 2 weeks after the workshops. Inter-observer variability was evaluated using dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and volume similarity (VOLSIM) index comparing reference and observer volumes. RESULTS Post-workshop primary gross tumour volumes (GTV) were smaller than pre-workshop volumes for lung with a mean percentage reduction of 10.4%. Breast clinical target volumes (CTV) were similar but seroma volumes were smaller post-workshop on both supine (65% reduction) and prone MRI (73% reduction). Based on DSC scores, improvement in inter-observer variability was seen for the seroma cavity volume on prone MRI with a reduction in DSC score range from 0.4-0.8 to 0.7-0.9. Breast CTV demonstrated good inter-observer variability scores (mean DSC 0.9) for both pre- and post-workshop. Post-workshop observer delineated cervix GTV was smaller than pre-workshop by 26.9%. CONCLUSION A radiologist-led workshop did not significantly reduce inter-observer variability in volume delineation for the three clinical sites. However, some improvement was noted in delineation of breast CTV, seroma volumes and cervix GTV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shivani Kumar
- South Western Sydney Clinical SchoolFaculty of MedicineUniversity of New South WalesSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy CentresLiverpool HospitalLiverpoolNew South WalesAustralia
- Ingham Institute of Applied Medical ResearchLiverpoolNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Lois Holloway
- South Western Sydney Clinical SchoolFaculty of MedicineUniversity of New South WalesSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy CentresLiverpool HospitalLiverpoolNew South WalesAustralia
- Ingham Institute of Applied Medical ResearchLiverpoolNew South WalesAustralia
- Centre for Medical Radiation PhysicsUniversity of WollongongSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Institute of Medical PhysicsSchool of PhysicsUniversity of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Dale Roach
- South Western Sydney Clinical SchoolFaculty of MedicineUniversity of New South WalesSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy CentresLiverpool HospitalLiverpoolNew South WalesAustralia
- Ingham Institute of Applied Medical ResearchLiverpoolNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Elise Pogson
- Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy CentresLiverpool HospitalLiverpoolNew South WalesAustralia
- Ingham Institute of Applied Medical ResearchLiverpoolNew South WalesAustralia
- Centre for Medical Radiation PhysicsUniversity of WollongongSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Institute of Medical PhysicsSchool of PhysicsUniversity of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | | | - Vikneswary Batumalai
- South Western Sydney Clinical SchoolFaculty of MedicineUniversity of New South WalesSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy CentresLiverpool HospitalLiverpoolNew South WalesAustralia
- Ingham Institute of Applied Medical ResearchLiverpoolNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Karen Lim
- South Western Sydney Clinical SchoolFaculty of MedicineUniversity of New South WalesSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy CentresLiverpool HospitalLiverpoolNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Geoff P. Delaney
- South Western Sydney Clinical SchoolFaculty of MedicineUniversity of New South WalesSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy CentresLiverpool HospitalLiverpoolNew South WalesAustralia
- Ingham Institute of Applied Medical ResearchLiverpoolNew South WalesAustralia
- University of Western SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Elizabeth Lazarus
- Department of RadiologyLiverpool HospitalLiverpoolNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Nira Borok
- Department of RadiologyLiverpool HospitalLiverpoolNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Daniel Moses
- Department of RadiologyPrince of Wales HospitalRandwickNew South WalesAustralia
- Prince of Wales Clinical SchoolFaculty of MedicineUniversity of New South WalesSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Michael G. Jameson
- South Western Sydney Clinical SchoolFaculty of MedicineUniversity of New South WalesSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy CentresLiverpool HospitalLiverpoolNew South WalesAustralia
- Ingham Institute of Applied Medical ResearchLiverpoolNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Shalini Vinod
- South Western Sydney Clinical SchoolFaculty of MedicineUniversity of New South WalesSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy CentresLiverpool HospitalLiverpoolNew South WalesAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Salembier C, Villeirs G, De Bari B, Hoskin P, Pieters BR, Van Vulpen M, Khoo V, Henry A, Bossi A, De Meerleer G, Fonteyne V. ESTRO ACROP consensus guideline on CT- and MRI-based target volume delineation for primary radiation therapy of localized prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 2018; 127:49-61. [PMID: 29496279 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 138] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2018] [Revised: 01/22/2018] [Accepted: 01/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Delineation of clinical target volumes (CTVs) remains a weak link in radiation therapy (RT), and large inter-observer variation is seen. Guidelines for target and organs at risk delineation for prostate cancer in the primary setting are scarce. The aim was to develop a delineation guideline obtained by consensus between a broad European group of radiation oncologists. MATERIAL AND METHODS An ESTRO contouring consensus panel consisting of leading radiation oncologists and one radiologist with known subspecialty expertise in prostate cancer was asked to delineate the prostate, seminal vesicles and rectum on co-registered CT and MRI scans. After evaluation of the different contours, literature review and multiple informal discussions by electronic mail a CTV definition was defined and a guide for contouring the CTV of the prostate and the rectum was developed. RESULTS The panel achieved consensus CTV contouring definitions to be used as guideline for primary RT of localized prostate cancer. CONCLUSION The ESTRO consensus on CT/MRI based CTV delineation for primary RT of localized prostate cancer, endorsed by a broad base of the radiation oncology community, is presented to improve consistency and reliability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carl Salembier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Europe Hospitals Brussels, Belgium
| | - Geert Villeirs
- Department of Radiology, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium
| | | | - Peter Hoskin
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, United Kingdom
| | - Bradley R Pieters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Academic Medical Center/University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marco Van Vulpen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Vincent Khoo
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ann Henry
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Alberto Bossi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Gert De Meerleer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Belgium
| | - Valérie Fonteyne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
The Challenges of Using MRI During Radiotherapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2018; 30:680-685. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2018.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2018] [Revised: 08/01/2018] [Accepted: 08/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
|
30
|
Hirose K, Sato M, Hatayama Y, Kawaguchi H, Komai F, Sohma M, Obara H, Suzuki M, Tanaka M, Fujioka I, Ichise K, Takai Y, Aoki M. The potential failure risk of the cone-beam computed tomography-based planning target volume margin definition for prostate image-guided radiotherapy based on a prospective single-institutional hybrid analysis. Radiat Oncol 2018; 13:106. [PMID: 29880006 PMCID: PMC5992771 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-018-1043-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2018] [Accepted: 05/02/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of markerless on-board kilovoltage (kV) cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based positioning uncertainty on determination of the planning target volume (PTV) margin by comparison with kV on-board imaging (OBI) with gold fiducial markers (FMs), and to validate a methodology for the evaluation of PTV margins for markerless kV-CBCT in prostate image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). Methods A total of 1177 pre- and 1177 post-treatment kV-OBI and 1177 pre- and 206 post-treatment kV-CBCT images were analyzed in 25 patients who received prostate IGRT with daily localization by implanted FMs. Intrafractional motion of the prostate was evaluated between each pre- and post-treatment image with these two different techniques. The differences in prostate deviations and intrafractional motions between matching by FM in kV-OBI (OBI-FM) and matching by soft tissues in kV-CBCT (CBCT-ST) were compared by Bland-Altman limits of agreement. Compensated PTV margins were determined and compensated by references. Results Mean differences between OBI-FM and CBCT-ST in the anterior to posterior (AP), superior to inferior (SI), and left to right (LR) directions were − 0.43 ± 1.45, − 0.09 ± 1.65, and − 0.12 ± 0.80 mm, respectively, with R2 = 0.85, 0.88, and 0.83, respectively. Intrafractional motions obtained from CBCT-ST were 0.00 ± 1.46, 0.02 ± 1.49, and 0.15 ± 0.64 mm, respectively, which were smaller than the results from OBI-FM, with 0.43 ± 1.90, 0.12 ± 1.98, and 0.26 ± 0.80 mm, respectively, with R2 = 0.42, 0.33, and 0.16, respectively. Bland-Altman analysis showed a significant proportional bias. PTV margins of 1.5 mm, 1.4 mm, and 0.9 mm for CBCT-ST were calculated from the values of CBCT-ST, which were also smaller than the values of 3.15 mm, 3.66 mm, and 1.60 mm from OBI-FM. The practical PTV margin for CBCT-ST was compensated with the values from OBI-FM as 4.1 mm, 4.8 mm, and 2.2 mm. Conclusions PTV margins calculated from CBCT-ST might be underestimated compared to the true PTV margins. To determine a reliable CBCT-ST-based PTV margin, at least the systemic error Σ and the random error σ for on-line matching errors need to be investigated by supportive preliminary FM evaluation at least once.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katsumi Hirose
- Department of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8562, Japan. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern Tohoku BNCT Research Center, 7-10, Yatsuyamada, Koriyama, Fukushima, 963-8052, Japan.
| | - Mariko Sato
- Department of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8562, Japan
| | - Yoshiomi Hatayama
- Department of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8562, Japan
| | - Hideo Kawaguchi
- Department of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8562, Japan
| | - Fumio Komai
- Division of Radiology, Hirosaki University Hospital, 53 Hon-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8563, Japan
| | - Makoto Sohma
- Division of Radiology, Hirosaki University Hospital, 53 Hon-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8563, Japan
| | - Hideki Obara
- Division of Radiology, Hirosaki University Hospital, 53 Hon-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8563, Japan
| | - Masashi Suzuki
- Division of Radiology, Hirosaki University Hospital, 53 Hon-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8563, Japan
| | - Mitsuki Tanaka
- Department of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8562, Japan
| | - Ichitaro Fujioka
- Department of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8562, Japan
| | - Koji Ichise
- Department of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8562, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Takai
- Department of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8562, Japan.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern Tohoku BNCT Research Center, 7-10, Yatsuyamada, Koriyama, Fukushima, 963-8052, Japan
| | - Masahiko Aoki
- Department of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8562, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Rooney MK, Zhu F, Gillespie EF, Gunther JR, McKillip RP, Lineberry M, Tekian A, Golden DW. Simulation as More Than a Treatment-Planning Tool: A Systematic Review of the Literature on Radiation Oncology Simulation-Based Medical Education. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 102:257-283. [PMID: 30191859 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.05.064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2018] [Revised: 04/17/2018] [Accepted: 05/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Simulation-based medical education (SBME) is gaining prominence as a tool to meet Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-mandated competency-based assessment educational goals. SBME is used in radiation oncology, although the type and extent are not clear. This study reports a systematic literature review designed to clarify the type and extent of radiation oncology SBME. METHODS AND MATERIALS The systematic review focused on radiation oncology SBME literature. The methods followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The inclusion criteria were identified according to the PICOS (population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and setting) framework. The population included undergraduate, graduate, and continuing medical education learners. Studies were limited to English-language studies published on or after January 1, 1990, in peer-reviewed journals. PubMed, MedEdPORTAL, and in-press articles were searched. The PubMed search was conducted using predefined search terms. References and similar articles were examined. Medical Subject Headings terms in selected articles were reviewed to ensure relevant terms were included. RESULTS Fifty-four SBME publications met the inclusion criteria. Only 9 of 54 studies (17%) self-identified as SBME. SBME types included screen-based simulators (56%), simulated environments (13%), virtual reality and haptic systems (13%), simulated patients (11%), part-task trainers (6%), and computer-based systems with mannequins (2%). A variety of radiation oncology skill sets were addressed, including contouring (54%), treatment planning (20%), clinical decision making (17%), anatomy and/or radiology (13%), radiation biology and/or physics (13%), communication skills and/or patient education (13%), brachytherapy (13%), and immobilization (11%). A target learning population was defined in 47 studies, including residents (53%), attending physicians (36%), medical students (21%), medical physicists (11%), radiation therapists (9%), nurses (6%), administrative staff (4%), and dosimetrists (4%). Learner feedback was reported in 32 studies. CONCLUSIONS Overall, this systematic literature review provides context and guidance for future radiation oncology SBME development. Appropriately framing SBME reports in the radiation oncology literature will facilitate development, implementation, and evaluation of SBME interventions. SBME resources should be centralized to facilitate dissemination and share resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael K Rooney
- College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Fan Zhu
- College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Erin F Gillespie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jillian R Gunther
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ryan P McKillip
- Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Matthew Lineberry
- Zamierowski Institute for Experiential Learning, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Ara Tekian
- Department of Medical Education, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Daniel W Golden
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Martin JM, Supiot S, Keall PJ, Catton CN. Moderately hypofractionated prostate external-beam radiotherapy: an emerging standard. Br J Radiol 2018; 91:20170807. [PMID: 29322821 PMCID: PMC6223284 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20170807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2017] [Revised: 01/05/2018] [Accepted: 01/08/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Research over recent years has demonstrated that curative external-beam radiotherapy can be safely and efficaciously delivered with roughly half the number of treatments which was previously considered standard. We review the data supporting this change in practice, methods for implementation, as well as emerging future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jarad M Martin
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, NSW, Australia
| | - Stephane Supiot
- Département de Radiothérapie, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Paul J Keall
- Radiation Physics Laboratory, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, NSW, Australia
| | - Charles N Catton
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Roach D, Jameson MG, Dowling JA, Ebert MA, Greer PB, Kennedy AM, Watt S, Holloway LC. Correlations between contouring similarity metrics and simulated treatment outcome for prostate radiotherapy. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018; 63:035001. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aaa50c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
34
|
Persson E, Gustafsson C, Nordström F, Sohlin M, Gunnlaugsson A, Petruson K, Rintelä N, Hed K, Blomqvist L, Zackrisson B, Nyholm T, Olsson LE, Siversson C, Jonsson J. MR-OPERA: A Multicenter/Multivendor Validation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Only Prostate Treatment Planning Using Synthetic Computed Tomography Images. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 99:692-700. [PMID: 28843375 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2016] [Revised: 05/12/2017] [Accepted: 06/07/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To validate the dosimetric accuracy and clinical robustness of a commercially available software for magnetic resonance (MR) to synthetic computed tomography (sCT) conversion, in an MR imaging-only workflow for 170 prostate cancer patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS The 4 participating centers had MriPlanner (Spectronic Medical), an atlas-based sCT generation software, installed as a cloud-based service. A T2-weighted MR sequence, covering the body contour, was added to the clinical protocol. The MR images were sent from the MR scanner workstation to the MriPlanner platform. The sCT was automatically returned to the treatment planning system. Four MR scanners and 2 magnetic field strengths were included in the study. For each patient, a CT-treatment plan was created and approved according to clinical practice. The sCT was rigidly registered to the CT, and the clinical treatment plan was recalculated on the sCT. The dose distributions from the CT plan and the sCT plan were compared according to a set of dose-volume histogram parameters and gamma evaluation. Treatment techniques included volumetric modulated arc therapy, intensity modulated radiation therapy, and conventional treatment using 2 treatment planning systems and different dose calculation algorithms. RESULTS The overall (multicenter/multivendor) mean dose differences between sCT and CT dose distributions were below 0.3% for all evaluated organs and targets. Gamma evaluation showed a mean pass rate of 99.12% (0.63%, 1 SD) in the complete body volume and 99.97% (0.13%, 1 SD) in the planning target volume using a 2%/2-mm global gamma criteria. CONCLUSIONS Results of the study show that the sCT conversion method can be used clinically, with minimal differences between sCT and CT dose distributions for target and relevant organs at risk. The small differences seen are consistent between centers, indicating that an MR imaging-only workflow using MriPlanner is robust for a variety of field strengths, vendors, and treatment techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilia Persson
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; Department of Medical Physics, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
| | - Christian Gustafsson
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; Department of Medical Physics, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Fredrik Nordström
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Maja Sohlin
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Adalsteinn Gunnlaugsson
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Karin Petruson
- Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Niina Rintelä
- Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kristoffer Hed
- Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lennart Blomqvist
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Tufve Nyholm
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; Department of Immunology, Genetics, and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Lars E Olsson
- Department of Medical Physics, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | | | - Joakim Jonsson
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Bridge P, Fielding A, Rowntree P, Pullar A. Qualitative Evaluation of a Novel 3D Volumetric Radiotherapy Segmentation Tool. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2017; 48:178-183. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2016.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2016] [Revised: 09/27/2016] [Accepted: 10/28/2016] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
36
|
Westendorp H, Surmann K, van de Pol SM, Hoekstra CJ, Kattevilder RA, Nuver TT, Moerland MA, Slump CH, Minken AW. Dosimetric impact of contouring and image registration variability on dynamic 125 I prostate brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 2017; 16:572-578. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2017.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2016] [Revised: 01/23/2017] [Accepted: 01/24/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
37
|
Harvey H, Orton MR, Morgan VA, Parker C, Dearnaley D, Fisher C, deSouza NM. Volumetry of the dominant intraprostatic tumour lesion: intersequence and interobserver differences on multiparametric MRI. Br J Radiol 2017; 90:20160416. [PMID: 28055249 PMCID: PMC5601508 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20160416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2016] [Revised: 11/10/2016] [Accepted: 01/03/2017] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To establish the interobserver reproducibility of tumour volumetry on individual multiparametric (mp) prostate MRI sequences, validate measurements with histology and determine whether functional to morphological volume ratios reflect Gleason score. METHODS 41 males with prostate cancer treated with prostatectomy (Cohort 1) or radical radiotherapy (Cohort 2), who had pre-treatment mpMRI [T2 weighted (T2W) MRI, diffusion-weighted (DW)-MRI and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI], were studied retrospectively. Dominant intraprostatic lesions (DIPLs) were manually delineated on each sequence and volumes were compared between observers (n = 40 analyzable) and with radical prostatectomy (n = 20). Volume ratios of DW-MRI and DCE-MRI to T2W MRI were documented and compared between Gleason grade 3 + 3, 3 + 4 and 4 + 3 or greater categories. RESULTS Limits of agreement of DIPL volumes between observers were: T2W MRI 0.9, -1.1 cm3, DW-MRI 1.3, -1.7 cm3 and DCE-MRI 0.74, -0.89 cm3. In Cohort 1, T2W volumes overestimated fixed specimen histological volumes (+33% Observer 1, +16% Observer 2); DW- and DCE-MRI underestimated histological volume, the latter markedly so (-32% Observer 1, -79% Observer 2). Differences between T2W, DW- and DCE-MRI volumes were significant (p < 10-8). The ratio of DW-MRI volume (73.9 ± 18.1% Observer 1, 72.5 ± 21.9% Observer 2) and DCE-MRI volume (42.6 ± 24.6% Observer 1, 34.3 ± 24.9% Observer 2) to T2W volume was significantly different (p < 10-8), but these volume ratios did not differ between the Gleason grades. CONCLUSION The low variability of the DIPL volume on T2W MRI between Observers and agreement with histology indicates its suitability for delineation of gross tumour volume for radiotherapy planning. The volume of cellular tumour represented by DW-MRI is greater than the vascular (DCE) abnormality; ratios of both to T2W volume are independent of Gleason score. Advances in knowledge: (1) Manual volume measurement of tumour is reproducible within 1 cm3 between observers on all sequences, confirming suitability across observers for radiotherapy planning. (2) Volumes derived on T2W MRI most accurately represent in vivo lesion volumes. (3) The proportion of cellular (DW-MRI) or vascular (DCE-MRI) volume to morphological (T2W MRI) volume is not affected by Gleason score.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hugh Harvey
- Cancer Research UK Imaging Centre, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Matthew R Orton
- Cancer Research UK Imaging Centre, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Veronica A Morgan
- Cancer Research UK Imaging Centre, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Chris Parker
- Academic Urology Unit, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - David Dearnaley
- Academic Urology Unit, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Cyril Fisher
- Department of Histopathology, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Nandita M deSouza
- Cancer Research UK Imaging Centre, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Evaluating Target Volume Delineation in the Era of Precision Radiotherapy: FRCR, Revalidation and Beyond. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2017; 29:436-438. [PMID: 28222956 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2017.01.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2017] [Revised: 01/23/2017] [Accepted: 01/24/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
39
|
Vinod SK, Jameson MG, Min M, Holloway LC. Uncertainties in volume delineation in radiation oncology: A systematic review and recommendations for future studies. Radiother Oncol 2016; 121:169-179. [PMID: 27729166 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 214] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2016] [Revised: 08/27/2016] [Accepted: 09/25/2016] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Volume delineation is a well-recognised potential source of error in radiotherapy. Whilst it is important to quantify the degree of interobserver variability (IOV) in volume delineation, the resulting impact on dosimetry and clinical outcomes is a more relevant endpoint. We performed a literature review of studies evaluating IOV in target volume and organ-at-risk (OAR) delineation in order to analyse these with respect to the metrics used, reporting of dosimetric consequences, and use of statistical tests. METHODS AND MATERIALS Medline and Pubmed databases were queried for relevant articles using keywords. We included studies published in English between 2000 and 2014 with more than two observers. RESULTS 119 studies were identified covering all major tumour sites. CTV (n=47) and GTV (n=38) were most commonly contoured. Median number of participants and data sets were 7 (3-50) and 9 (1-132) respectively. There was considerable heterogeneity in the use of metrics and methods of analysis. Statistical analysis of results was reported in 68% (n=81) and dosimetric consequences in 21% (n=25) of studies. CONCLUSION There is a lack of consistency in conducting and reporting analyses from IOV studies. We suggest a framework to use for future studies evaluating IOV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shalini K Vinod
- Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital, Australia; South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Australia; Western Sydney University, Australia.
| | - Michael G Jameson
- Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital, Australia; Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research, Liverpool Hospital, Australia; Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Australia
| | - Myo Min
- Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital, Australia; South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Australia; Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research, Liverpool Hospital, Australia
| | - Lois C Holloway
- Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital, Australia; South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Australia; Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research, Liverpool Hospital, Australia; Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Holyoake DLP, Robinson M, Grose D, McIntosh D, Sebag-Montefiore D, Radhakrishna G, Patel N, Partridge M, Mukherjee S, Hawkins MA. Conformity analysis to demonstrate reproducibility of target volumes for Margin-Intense Stereotactic Radiotherapy for borderline-resectable pancreatic cancer. Radiother Oncol 2016; 121:86-91. [PMID: 27519585 PMCID: PMC5100802 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2016] [Revised: 07/22/2016] [Accepted: 08/01/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Margin-directed neoadjuvant radiotherapy for borderline-resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) aims to facilitate clear surgical margins. A systematic method was developed for definition of a boost target volume prior to a formal phase-I study. MATERIAL AND METHODS Reference structures were defined by two oncologists and one radiologist, target structures were submitted by eight oncologist investigators and compared using conformity indices. Resultant risk of duodenal bleed (NTCP) was modelled. RESULTS For GTV, reference volume was 2.1cm3 and investigator mean was 6.03cm3 (95% CI 3.92-8.13cm3), for boost volume 1.1cm3 and 1.25cm3 (1.02-1.48cm3). Mean Dice conformity coefficient for GTV was 0.47 (0.38-0.56), and for boost volume was significantly higher at 0.61 (0.52-0.70, p=0.01). Discordance index (DI) for GTV was 0.65 (0.56-0.75) and for boost volume was significantly lower at 0.39 (0.28-0.49, p=0.001). NTCP using reference contours was 2.95%, with mean for investigator contour plans 3.93% (3.63-4.22%). Correlations were seen between NTCP and GTV volume (p=0.02) and NTCP and DI (correlation coefficient 0.83 (0.29-0.97), p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS Better conformity with reference was shown for boost volume compared with GTV. Investigator GTV volumes were larger than reference, had higher DI scores and modelled toxicity risk. A consistent method of target structure definition for margin-directed pancreatic radiotherapy is demonstrated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel L P Holyoake
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, UK; The Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Maxwell Robinson
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, UK; The Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Derek Grose
- The Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - David Sebag-Montefiore
- University of Leeds, CRUK Leeds Centre, UK; Leeds Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | | | | | - Mike Partridge
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Somnath Mukherjee
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, UK; The Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Maria A Hawkins
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, UK; The Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Bell LJ. Increasing consistency and accuracy in radiation therapy via educational interventions is not just limited to radiation oncologists. J Med Radiat Sci 2016; 63:145-7. [PMID: 27648277 PMCID: PMC5016613 DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
This editorial is advocating that increasing consistency and accuracy in radiation therapy via educational interventions is important for radiation therapist. Education and training with ongoing refreshers is the key to maintaining consistency throughout the radiotherapy process, which in turn will ensure all patients receive accurate treatment.![]()
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda J Bell
- Department of Radiation Oncology Northern Sydney Cancer Centre Royal North Shore Hospital St Leonards New South Wales Australia
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Holyoake DLP, Ward E, Grose D, McIntosh D, Sebag-Montefiore D, Radhakrishna G, Patel N, Silva M, Mukherjee S, Strauss VY, Odondi L, Fokas E, Melcher A, Hawkins MA. A phase-I trial of pre-operative, margin intensive, stereotactic body radiation therapy for pancreatic cancer: the 'SPARC' trial protocol. BMC Cancer 2016; 16:728. [PMID: 27619800 PMCID: PMC5020462 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-016-2765-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2016] [Accepted: 08/17/2016] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Standard therapy for borderline-resectable pancreatic cancer in the UK is surgery with adjuvant chemotherapy, but rates of resection with clear margins are unsatisfactory and overall survival remains poor. Meta-analysis of single-arm studies shows the potential of neo-adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy but the relative radio-resistance of pancreatic cancer means the efficacy of conventional dose schedules is limited. Stereotactic radiotherapy achieves sufficient accuracy and precision to enable pre-operative margin-intensive dose escalation with the goal of increasing rates of clear resection margins and local disease control. METHODS/DESIGN SPARC is a "rolling-six" design single-arm study to establish the maximum tolerated dose for margin-intensive stereotactic radiotherapy before resection of pancreatic cancer at high risk of positive resection margins. Eligible patients will have histologically or cytologically proven pancreatic cancer defined as borderline-resectable per National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria or operable tumour in contact with vessels increasing the risk of positive margin. Up to 24 patients will be recruited from up to 5 treating centres and a 'rolling-six' design is utilised to minimise delays and facilitate ongoing recruitment during dose-escalation. Radiotherapy will be delivered in 5 daily fractions and surgery, if appropriate, will take place 5-6 weeks after radiotherapy. The margin-intense radiotherapy concept includes a systematic method to define the target volume for a simultaneous integrated boost in the region of tumour-vessel infiltration, and up to 4 radiotherapy dose levels will be investigated. Maximum tolerated dose is defined as the highest dose at which no more than 1 of 6 patients or 0 of 3 patients experience a dose limiting toxicity. Secondary endpoints include resection rate, resection margin status, response rate, overall survival and progression free survival at 12 and 24 months. Translational work will involve exploratory analyses of the cytological and humoral immunological responses to stereotactic radiotherapy in pancreatic cancer. Radiotherapy quality assurance of target definition and radiotherapy planning is enforced with pre-trial test cases and on-trial review. Recruitment began in April 2015. DISCUSSION This prospective multi-centre study aims to establish the maximum tolerated dose of pre-operative margin-intensified stereotactic radiotherapy in pancreatic cancer at high risk of positive resection margins with a view to subsequent definitive comparison with other neoadjuvant treatment options. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN14138956 . Funded by CRUK.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel L. P. Holyoake
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7DQ UK
| | - Elizabeth Ward
- Oncology Clinical Trials Office, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7DQ UK
| | - Derek Grose
- The Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, 1053 Great Western Rd, Glasgow, G12 0YN UK
| | - David McIntosh
- The Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, 1053 Great Western Rd, Glasgow, G12 0YN UK
| | - David Sebag-Montefiore
- The University of Leeds, Cancer Research UK Leeds Centre,14 Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, Cancer Genetics Building, St James’s University Hospital, 15 Beckett Street, Leeds, West Yorkshire LS9 7TF UK
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Bexley Wing, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF UK
| | - Ganesh Radhakrishna
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Bexley Wing, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF UK
| | - Neel Patel
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Old Road, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LE UK
| | - Michael Silva
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Old Road, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LE UK
| | - Somnath Mukherjee
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7DQ UK
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Old Road, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LE UK
| | - Victoria Y. Strauss
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Botnar Research Centre, Windmill Road, Oxford, OX3 7LD UK
| | - Lang’o Odondi
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Botnar Research Centre, Windmill Road, Oxford, OX3 7LD UK
| | - Emmanouil Fokas
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7DQ UK
| | - Alan Melcher
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Chester Beatty Laboratories, 237, Fulham Rd, London, SW3 6JB UK
| | - Maria A. Hawkins
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7DQ UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Intraobserver Variability: Should We Worry? J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2016; 47:217-220. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2016.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2016] [Accepted: 06/20/2016] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
44
|
Moghanaki D, Turkbey B, Vapiwala N, Ehdaie B, Frank SJ, McLaughlin PW, Harisinghani M. Advances in Prostate Cancer Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography for Staging and Radiotherapy Treatment Planning. Semin Radiat Oncol 2016; 27:21-33. [PMID: 27986208 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2016.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Conventional prostate cancer staging strategies have limited accuracy to define the location, grade, and burden of disease. Evaluations have historically relied upon prostate-specific antigen levels, digital rectal examinations, random systematic biopsies, computed tomography, pelvic lymphadenectomy, or 99mtechnetium methylene diphosphonate bone scans. Today, risk-stratification tools incorporate these data in a weighted format to guide management. However, the limitations and potential consequences of their uncertainties are well known. Inaccurate information may contribute to understaging and undertreatment, or overstaging and overtreatment. Meanwhile, advances in multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), whole-body MRI, lymphotropic nanoparticle-enhanced MRI, and positron emission tomography are now available to improve the accuracy of risk stratification to facilitate more informed medical decisions. They also guide radiation oncologists to develop more accurate treatment plans. This review provides a primer to incorporate these advances into routine clinical workflow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Drew Moghanaki
- Radiation Oncology Service, Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.
| | - Baris Turkbey
- Molecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Neha Vapiwala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Behfar Ehdaie
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Steven J Frank
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Mukesh Harisinghani
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Gunther JR, Liauw SL, Choi S, Mohamed ASR, Thaker NG, Fuller CD, Stepaniak CJ, Das P, Golden DW. A Prostate Fossa Contouring Instructional Module: Implementation and Evaluation. J Am Coll Radiol 2016; 13:835-841.e1. [PMID: 27210232 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.02.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2015] [Revised: 01/25/2016] [Accepted: 02/24/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE Radiation oncology trainees frequently learn to contour through clinical experience and lectures. A hands-on contouring module was developed to teach delineation of the postoperative prostate clinical target volume (CTV) and improve contouring accuracy. METHODS Medical students independently contoured a prostate fossa CTV before and after receiving educational materials and live instruction detailing the RTOG approach to contouring this CTV. Metrics for volume overlap and surface distance (Dice similarity coefficient, Hausdorff distance (HD), and mean distance) determined discordance between student and consensus contours. An evaluation assessed perception of session efficacy (1 = "not at all" to 5 = "extremely"; reported as median[interquartile range]). Non-parametric statistical tests were used. RESULTS Twenty-four students at two institutions completed the module, and 21 completed the evaluation (88% response). The content was rated as "quite" important (4[3.5-5]). The module improved comfort contouring a prostate fossa (pre 1[1-2] vs. post 4[3-4], p<.01), ability to find references (pre 2[1-3] vs. post 4[3.5-4], p<0.01), knowledge of CT prostate/pelvis anatomy (pre 2[1.5-3] vs. post 3[3-4], p<.01), and ability to use contouring software tools (pre 2[2-3.5] vs. post 3[3-4], p=.01). After intervention, mean DSC increased (0.29 to 0.68, p<0.01) and HD and mean distance both decreased, respectively (42.8 to 30.0, p<.01; 11.5 to 1.9, p<.01). CONCLUSIONS A hands-on module to teach CTV delineation to medical students was developed and implemented. Student and expert contours exhibited near "excellent agreement" (as defined in the literature) after intervention. Additional modules to teach target delineation to all educational levels can be developed using this model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jillian R Gunther
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| | - Stanley L Liauw
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Seungtaek Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Abdallah S R Mohamed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Nikhil G Thaker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Clifton D Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Prajnan Das
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Daniel W Golden
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Vinod SK, Min M, Jameson MG, Holloway LC. A review of interventions to reduce inter-observer variability in volume delineation in radiation oncology. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2016; 60:393-406. [DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.12462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2015] [Accepted: 03/16/2016] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Shalini K Vinod
- Cancer Therapy Centre; Liverpool Hospital; Liverpool New South Wales Australia
- South Western Sydney Clinical School; University of NSW; Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Western Sydney University; Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Myo Min
- Cancer Therapy Centre; Liverpool Hospital; Liverpool New South Wales Australia
- South Western Sydney Clinical School; University of NSW; Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Michael G Jameson
- Cancer Therapy Centre; Liverpool Hospital; Liverpool New South Wales Australia
- Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research; Liverpool Hospital; Liverpool New South Wales Australia
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics; University of Wollongong; Wollongong New South Wales Australia
| | - Lois C Holloway
- Cancer Therapy Centre; Liverpool Hospital; Liverpool New South Wales Australia
- South Western Sydney Clinical School; University of NSW; Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Western Sydney University; Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research; Liverpool Hospital; Liverpool New South Wales Australia
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Segedin B, Petric P. Uncertainties in target volume delineation in radiotherapy - are they relevant and what can we do about them? Radiol Oncol 2016; 50:254-62. [PMID: 27679540 PMCID: PMC5024655 DOI: 10.1515/raon-2016-0023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2015] [Accepted: 02/01/2016] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Modern radiotherapy techniques enable delivery of high doses to the target volume without escalating dose to organs at risk, offering the possibility of better local control while preserving good quality of life. Uncertainties in target volume delineation have been demonstrated for most tumour sites, and various studies indicate that inconsistencies in target volume delineation may be larger than errors in all other steps of the treatment planning and delivery process. The aim of this paper is to summarize the degree of delineation uncertainties for different tumour sites reported in the literature and review the effect of strategies to minimize them. Conclusions Our review confirmed that interobserver variability in target volume contouring represents the largest uncertainty in the process for most tumour sites, potentially resulting in a systematic error in dose delivery, which could influence local control in individual patients. For most tumour sites the optimal combination of imaging modalities for target delineation still needs to be determined. Strict use of delineation guidelines and protocols is advisable both in every day clinical practice and in clinical studies to diminish interobserver variability. Continuing medical education of radiation oncologists cannot be overemphasized, intensive formal training on interpretation of sectional imaging should be included in the program for radiation oncology residents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Segedin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Primoz Petric
- Department of Radation Oncology, National Centre for Cancer Care and Research, Doha, Qatar
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
McPartlin AJ, Li XA, Kershaw LE, Heide U, Kerkmeijer L, Lawton C, Mahmood U, Pos F, van As N, van Herk M, Vesprini D, van der Voort van Zyp J, Tree A, Choudhury A. MRI-guided prostate adaptive radiotherapy - A systematic review. Radiother Oncol 2016; 119:371-80. [PMID: 27162159 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 114] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2016] [Revised: 04/08/2016] [Accepted: 04/09/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Dose escalated radiotherapy improves outcomes for men with prostate cancer. A plateau for benefit from dose escalation using EBRT may not have been reached for some patients with higher risk disease. The use of increasingly conformal techniques, such as step and shoot IMRT or more recently VMAT, has allowed treatment intensification to be achieved whilst minimising associated increases in toxicity to surrounding normal structures. To support further safe dose escalation, the uncertainties in the treatment target position will need be minimised using optimal planning and image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). In particular the increasing usage of profoundly hypo-fractionated stereotactic therapy is predicated on the ability to confidently direct treatment precisely to the intended target for the duration of each treatment. This article reviews published studies on the influences of varies types of motion on daily prostate position and how these may be mitigated to improve IGRT in future. In particular the role that MRI has played in the generation of data is discussed and the potential role of the MR-Linac in next-generation IGRT is discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A J McPartlin
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust and Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, UK
| | - X A Li
- Medical College of Wisconsin, USA
| | - L E Kershaw
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust and Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, UK
| | - U Heide
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, The Netherlands
| | - L Kerkmeijer
- University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - C Lawton
- Medical College of Wisconsin, USA
| | - U Mahmood
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - F Pos
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, The Netherlands
| | - N van As
- Royal Marsden Hospital, UK; Institute of Cancer Research, UK
| | - M van Herk
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust and Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, UK
| | - D Vesprini
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | | | - A Tree
- Royal Marsden Hospital, UK
| | - A Choudhury
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust and Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Nicholls L, Gorayski P, Poulsen M, Plank AW, Schick K, Pham T, Khoo ELH. Maintaining prostate contouring consistency following an educational intervention. J Med Radiat Sci 2016; 63:155-60. [PMID: 27648279 PMCID: PMC5016611 DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2015] [Revised: 01/17/2016] [Accepted: 02/09/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The aim of this study was to assess variation in prostate contouring 12 months following a structured interactive educational intervention (EI) and to test the hypothesis that EIs positively impact on prostate contouring accuracy and consistency long term. Methods A common set of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data sets were used to assess prostate contouring consistency before, immediately after and 12 months following an EI. No further EIs were provided after the initial EI. Contour variation was assessed using the volume ratio (VR), defined as the ratio of the encompassing volume to common volume. Results Of the original five radiation oncologists (ROs) at baseline, four completed all assessments, and one was unavailable at 12 months follow‐up. At 12 months, mean VR deteriorated by 3.2% on CT and 1.9% on MRI compared to immediately post EI. Overall, compared to the pre‐EI baseline VR, an improvement of 11.4% and 10.8% was demonstrated on CT and MRI, respectively. Conclusion Good retention of applied knowledge 12 months following an EI on prostate contouring was demonstrated. This study advocates for EIs to be included as part of continuing medical education to reduce contour variation among ROs and improve knowledge retention long term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luke Nicholls
- Radiation Oncology Centres Cairns Queensland Australia; School of Medicine University of Queensland St. Lucia Queensland Australia
| | - Peter Gorayski
- School of Medicine University of Queensland St. Lucia Queensland Australia; Radiation Oncology Centres Springfield Queensland Australia
| | - Michael Poulsen
- School of Medicine University of Queensland St. Lucia Queensland Australia; Radiation Oncology Centres St Andrew's Cancer Care Centre Toowoomba Queensland Australia
| | - Ashley W Plank
- Oncology Research Australia St Andrew's Hospital Toowoomba Queensland Australia
| | - Karlissa Schick
- Radiation Oncology Centres St Andrew's Cancer Care Centre Toowoomba Queensland Australia
| | - Thuy Pham
- Radiation Oncology Centres St Andrew's Cancer Care Centre Toowoomba Queensland Australia
| | - Eric L H Khoo
- Radiation Oncology Centres St Andrew's Cancer Care Centre Toowoomba Queensland Australia
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Emerging Modalities in Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer. Prostate Cancer 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-800077-9.00048-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
|