Using a Reduced Spot Size for Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy Potentially Improves Salivary Gland-Sparing in Oropharyngeal Cancer

Quantification of beam size impact on intensity-modulated proton therapy with robust optimization in head and neck cancer-comparison with intensity-modulated radiation therapy

We assessed the effect of beam size on plan robustness for intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) of head and neck cancer (HNC) and compared the plan quality including robustness with that of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). IMPT plans were generated for six HNC patients using six beam sizes (air-sigma 3-17 mm at isocenter for a 70-230 MeV) and two optimization methods for planning target volume-based non-robust optimization (NRO) and clinical target volume (CTV)-based robust optimization (RO). Worst-case dosimetric parameters and plan robustness for CTV and organs-at-risk (OARs) were assessed under different scenarios, assuming a ± 1-5 mm setup error and a ± 3% range error. Statistical comparisons of NRO-IMPT, RO-IMPT and IMRT plans were performed. In regard to CTV-D99%, RO-IMPT with smaller beam size was more robust than RO-IMPT with larger beam sizes, whereas NRO-IMPT showed the opposite (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the robustness of the CTV-D99% and CTV-D95% between RO-IMPT and IMRT. The worst-case CTV coverage of IMRT (±5 mm/3%) for all patients was 96.0% ± 1.4% (D99%) and 97.9% ± 0.3% (D95%). For four out of six patients, the worst-case CTV-D95% for RO-IMPT (±1-5 mm/3%) were higher than those for IMRT. Compared with IMRT, RO-IMPT with smaller beam sizes achieved lower worst-case doses to OARs. In HNC treatment, utilizing smaller beam sizes in RO-IMPT improves plan robustness compared to larger beam sizes, achieving comparable target robustness and lower worst-case OARs doses compared to IMRT.

Clinical Introduction of Stem Cell Sparing Radiotherapy to Reduce the Risk of Xerostomia in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Studies have shown that dose to the parotid gland stem cell rich (SCR) regions should be reduced to lower the risk of xerostomia after radiotherapy (RT). This study aimed to assess whether stem cell sparing (SCS)-RT can be adopted in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

Multiple planning studies were performed to compare SCS-RT with standard (ST)-RT using 30 head and neck cancer patients. Shifts in mean dose to the SCR regions (Dmean,SCR) and other organs at risk and their estimated impact on normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for side-effects were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. A multicenter study was performed (eight institutions, three patients) to test the generalizability of SCS-RT using the Friedman test.

RESULTS

Using photons, Dmean,SCR was reduced with median 4.1/3.5 Gy for ipsilateral/contralateral (p < 0.001). The largest reductions were when the SCR regions overlapped less with target volumes. Subsequently, NTCPs for xerostomia decreased (p < 0.001). Using protons, Dmean,SCR was also reduced (2.2/1.9 Gy for ipsilateral/contralateral, p < 0.002). Nevertheless, SCS-RT did not further decrease NTCPs for xerostomia (p > 0.17). Target coverage and prevention of other side-effects were not compromised. However, increased mean oral cavity dose was observed in some patients. Lastly, in the multicenter study Dmean,SCR could be reduced by slightly adjusting the standard optimization. Contralateral Dmean,SCR reductions differed between centers (p = 0.01), which was attributed to differences in ST-RT plans.

CONCLUSIONS

Stem cell sparing radiotherapy can be clinically introduced by making small adjustments to the optimization strategy and can reduce the risk of xerostomia.

Current Status and Future Directions of Proton Therapy for Head and Neck Carcinoma

The growing interest in proton therapy (PT) in recent decades is justified by the evidence that protons dose distribution allows maximal dose release at the tumor depth followed by sharp distal dose fall-off. But, in the holistic management of head and neck cancer (HNC), limiting the potential of PT to a mere dosimetric advantage appears reductive. Indeed, the precise targeting of PT may help evaluate the effectiveness of de-escalation strategies, especially for patients with human papillomavirus associated-oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) and nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC). Furthermore, PT could have potentially greater immunogenic effects than conventional photon therapy, possibly enhancing both the radiotherapy (RT) capability to activate anti-tumor immune response and the effectiveness of immunotherapy drugs. Based on these premises, the aim of the present paper is to conduct a narrative review reporting the safety and efficacy of PT compared to photon RT focusing on NPC and OPC. We also provide a snapshot of ongoing clinical trials comparing PT with photon RT for these two clinical scenarios. Finally, we discuss new insights that may further develop clinical research on PT for HNC.

Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Head and Neck Cancer Care: Optimizing Oral Health Management for Patients Undergoing Radiation Therapy

Radiation therapy (RT) plays a crucial role in the treatment of head and neck cancers (HNCs). This paper emphasizes the importance of effective communication and collaboration between radiation oncologists and dental specialists in the HNC care pathway. It also provides an overview of the role of RT in HNC treatment and illustrates the interdisciplinary collaboration between these teams to optimize patient care, expedite treatment, and prevent post-treatment oral complications. The methods utilized include a thorough analysis of existing research articles, case reports, and clinical guidelines, with terms such as 'dental management', 'oral oncology', 'head and neck cancer', and 'radiotherapy' included for this review. The findings underscore the significance of the early involvement of dental specialists in the treatment planning phase to assess and prepare patients for RT, including strategies such as prophylactic tooth extraction to mitigate potential oral complications. Furthermore, post-treatment oral health follow-up and management by dental specialists are crucial in minimizing the incidence and severity of RT-induced oral sequelae. In conclusion, these proactive measures help minimize dental and oral complications before, during, and after treatment.

Modelling small block aperture in an in-house developed GPU-accelerated Monte Carlo-based dose engine for pencil beam scanning proton therapy

Purpose. To enhance an in-house graphic-processing-unit accelerated virtual particle (VP)-based Monte Carlo (MC) proton dose engine (VPMC) to model aperture blocks in both dose calculation and optimization for pencil beam scanning proton therapy (PBSPT)-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).Methods and materials. A module to simulate VPs passing through patient-specific aperture blocks was developed and integrated in VPMC based on simulation results of realistic particles (primary protons and their secondaries). To validate the aperture block module, VPMC was first validated by an opensource MC code, MCsquare, in eight water phantom simulations with 3 cm thick brass apertures: four were with aperture openings of 1, 2, 3, and 4 cm without a range shifter, while the other four were with same aperture opening configurations with a range shifter of 45 mm water equivalent thickness. Then, VPMC was benchmarked with MCsquare and RayStation MC for 10 patients with small targets (average volume 8.4 c.c. with range of 0.4-43.3 c.c.). Finally, 3 typical patients were selected for robust optimization with aperture blocks using VPMC.Results. In the water phantoms, 3D gamma passing rate (2%/2 mm/10%) between VPMC and MCsquare was 99.71 ± 0.23%. In the patient geometries, 3D gamma passing rates (3%/2 mm/10%) between VPMC/MCsquare and RayStation MC were 97.79 ± 2.21%/97.78 ± 1.97%, respectively. Meanwhile, the calculation time was drastically decreased from 112.45 ± 114.08 s (MCsquare) to 8.20 ± 6.42 s (VPMC) with the same statistical uncertainties of ~0.5%. The robustly optimized plans met all the dose-volume-constraints (DVCs) for the targets and OARs per our institutional protocols. The mean calculation time for 13 influence matrices in robust optimization by VPMC was 41.6 s and the subsequent on-the-fly 'trial-and-error' optimization procedure took only 71.4 s on average for the selected three patients.Conclusion. VPMC has been successfully enhanced to model aperture blocks in dose calculation and optimization for the PBSPT-based SRS.

PETRA: A pencil beam trimming algorithm for analytical proton therapy dose calculations with the dynamic collimation system

BACKGROUND

The Dynamic Collimation System (DCS) has been shown to produce superior treatment plans to uncollimated pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy using an in-house treatment planning system (TPS) designed for research. Clinical implementation of the DCS requires the development and benchmarking of a rigorous dose calculation algorithm that accounts for pencil beam trimming, performs monitor unit calculations to produce deliverable plans at all beam energies, and is ideally implemented with a commercially available TPS.

PURPOSE

To present an analytical Pencil bEam TRimming Algorithm (PETRA) for the DCS, with and without its range shifter, implemented in the Astroid TPS (.decimal, Sanford, Florida, USA).

MATERIALS

PETRA was derived by generalizing an existing pencil beam dose calculation model to account for the DCS-specific effects of lateral penumbra blurring due to the nickel trimmers in two different planes, integral depth dose variation due to the trimming process, and the presence and absence of the range shifter. Tuning parameters were introduced to enable agreement between PETRA and a measurement-validated Dynamic Collimation Monte Carlo (DCMC) model of the Miami Cancer Institute's IBA Proteus Plus system equipped with the DCS. Trimmer position, spot position, beam energy, and the presence or absence of a range shifter were all used as variables for the characterization of the model. The model was calibrated for pencil beam monitor unit calculations using procedures specified by International Atomic Energy Agency Technical Report Series 398 (IAEA TRS-398).

RESULTS

The integral depth dose curves (IDDs) for energies between 70 MeV and 160 MeV among all simulated trimmer combinations, with and without the ranger shifter, agreed between PETRA and DCMC at the 1%/1 mm 1-D gamma criteria for 99.99% of points. For lateral dose profiles, the median 2-D gamma pass rate for all profiles at 1.5%/1.5 mm was 99.99% at the water phantom surface, plateau, and Bragg peak depths without the range shifter and at the surface and Bragg peak depths with the range shifter. The minimum 1.5%/1.5 mm gamma pass rates for the 2-D profiles at the water phantom surface without and with the range shifter were 98.02% and 97.91%, respectively, and, at the Bragg peak, the minimum pass rates were 97.80% and 97.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The PETRA model for DCS dose calculations was successfully defined and benchmarked for use in a commercially available TPS.

Design, testing and characterization of a proton central axis alignment device for the dynamic collimation system

Objective. Proton therapy conformity has improved over the years by evolving from passive scattering to spot scanning delivery technologies with smaller proton beam spot sizes. Ancillary collimation devices, such the Dynamic Collimation System (DCS), further improves high dose conformity by sharpening the lateral penumbra. However, as spot sizes are reduced, collimator positional errors play a significant impact on the dose distributions and hence accurate collimator to radiation field alignment is critical.Approach. The purpose of this work was to develop a system to align and verify coincidence between the center of the DCS and the proton beam central axis. The Central Axis Alignment Device (CAAD) is composed of a camera and scintillating screen-based beam characterization system. Within a light-tight box, a 12.3-megapixel camera monitors a P43/Gadox scintillating screen via a 45° first-surface mirror. When a collimator trimmer of the DCS is placed in the uncalibrated center of the field, the proton radiation beam continuously scans a 7×7 cm2square field across the scintillator and collimator trimmer while a 7 s exposure is acquired. From the relative positioning of the trimmer to the radiation field, the true center of the radiation field can be calculated.Main results.The CAAD can calculate the offset between the proton beam radiation central axis and the DCS central axis within 0.054 mm accuracy and 0.075 mm reproducibility.Significance.Using the CAAD, the DCS is now able to be aligned accurately to the proton radiation beam central axis and no longer relies on an x-ray source in the gantry head which is only validated to within 1.0 mm of the proton beam.

Proton Beam Radiation Therapy for Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Purpose

To discuss the role of proton beam therapy (PBT) in the treatment of patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC).

Materials and Methods

A review of the pertinent literature.

Results

Proton beam therapy likely results in reduced acute and late toxicity as compared with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). The extent of the reduced toxicity, which may be modest, depends on the endpoint and technical factors such as pencil beam versus passive scattered PBT and adaptive replanning. The disease control rates after PBT are likely similar to those after IMRT.

Conclusion

Proton beam therapy is an attractive option to treat patients with OPSCC. Whether it becomes widely available depends on access.

Proton Therapy for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: Early Clinical Experience and Current Challenges

Simple Summary

Proton therapy is a promising type of radiation therapy used to destroy tumor cells. It has the potential to further improve the outcomes for patients with head and neck cancer since it allows to minimize the radiation dose to vital structures around the tumor, leading to less toxicity. This paper describes the current experience worldwide with proton therapy in head and neck cancer.

Abstract

Proton therapy (PT) is a promising development in radiation oncology, with the potential to further improve outcomes for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC). By utilizing the finite range of protons, healthy tissue can be spared from beam exit doses that would otherwise be irradiated with photon-based treatments. Current evidence on PT for HNSCC is limited to comparative dosimetric analyses and retrospective single-institution series. As a consequence, the recognized indications for the reimbursement of PT remain scarce in most countries. Nevertheless, approximately 100 PT centers are in operation worldwide, and initial experiences for HNSCC are being reported. This review aims to summarize the results of the early clinical experience with PT for HNSCC and the challenges that are currently faced.

Technical Note: Evaluation and 2nd check of a commercial Monte Carlo dose engine for small-field apertures in pencil beam scanning proton therapy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the accuracy of the RayStation Monte Carlo dose engine (RayStation MC) in modeling small-field block apertures in proton pencil beam scanning. Furthermore, we evaluate the suitability of MCsquare as a 2^nd check for RayStation MC.

METHODS

We have enhanced MCsquare to model block apertures. To test the accuracy of both RayStation MC and the newly enhanced MCsquare, we compare the dose predictions of each to in-water dose measurements obtained using diode detectors and radiochromic film. Nine brass apertures with openings of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 cm and either 2 cm or 4 cm thickness were used in the irradiation of a water phantom. Two measurement setups were used, one with a range shifter and 119.7 MeV proton beam energy and the other with no range shifter and 147 MeV proton beam energy. To further test the validity of RayStation MC and MCsquare in modeling block apertures and to evaluate MCsquare as a 2^nd check tool, ten small-field (average target volume 8.3 cm³ ) patient treatment plans were calculated by each dose engine followed by a statistical comparison.

RESULTS

Comparing to the absolute dose measurements in water, RayStation MC differed by 1.2% ± 1.0% while MCsquare differed by -1.8% ± 3.7% in the plateau region of a pristine Bragg peak. Compared to the in-water film measurements, RayStation MC and MCsquare both performed well with an average 2D-3D gamma passing rate of 99.4% and 99.7% (3%/3mm) respectively. A t-test comparing the agreement with the film measurements between RayStation MC and MCsquare suggested that the relative spatial dose distributions calculated by MCsquare and RayStation MC were statistically indistinguishable. Directly comparing the dose calculations between MCsquare and RayStation MC over ten patients resulted in an average 3D-3D gamma passing rates of 98.5% (3%/3mm) and 94.1% (2%/2mm) respectively.

CONCLUSION

The validity of RayStation MC algorithm for use with patient-specific apertures has been expanded to include small apertures. MCsquare has been enhanced to model apertures and was found to be an adequate 2^nd check of RayStation MC in this scenario. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Investigating aperture-based approximations to model a focused dynamic collimation system for pencil beam scanning proton therapy

Purpose. The Dynamic Collimation System (DCS) is an energy layer-specific collimation device designed to reduce the lateral penumbra in pencil beam scanning proton therapy. The DCS consists of two pairs of nickel trimmers that rapidly and independently move and rotate to intercept the scanning proton beam and an integrated range shifter to treat targets less than 4 cm deep. This work examines the validity of a single aperture approximation to model the DCS, a commonly used approximation in commercial treatment planning systems, as well as higher-order aperture-based approximations for modeling DCS-collimated dose distributions.Methods. An experimentally validated TOPAS/Geant4-based Monte Carlo model of the DCS integrated with a beam model of the IBA pencil beam scanning dedicated nozzle was used to simulate DCS- and aperture-collimated 100 MeV beamlets and composite treatment plans. The DCS was represented by three different aperture approximations: a single aperture placed halfway between the upper and lower trimmer planes, two apertures located at the upper and lower trimmer planes, and four apertures, located at both the upstream and downstream faces of each pair of trimmers. Line profiles and three-dimensional regions of interest were used to evaluate the validity and limitations of the aperture approximations investigated.Results. For pencil beams without a range shifter, minimal differences were observed between the DCS and single aperture approximation. For range shifted beamlets, the single aperture approximation yielded wider penumbra widths (up to 18%) in the X-direction and sharper widths (up to 9.4%) in the Y-direction. For the example treatment plan, the root-mean-square errors (RMSEs) in an overall three-dimensional region of interest were 1.7%, 1.3%, and 1.7% for the single aperture, two aperture, and four aperture models, respectively. If the region of interest only encompasses the lateral edges outside of the target, the resulting RMSEs were 1.7%, 1.1%, and 0.5% single aperture, two aperture, and four aperture models, respectively.Conclusions. Monte Carlo simulations of the DCS demonstrated that a single aperture approximation is sufficient for modeling pristine fields at the Bragg depth while range shifted fields require a higher-order aperture approximation. For the treatment plan considered, the double aperture model performed the best overall, however, the four-aperture model most accurately modeled the lateral field edges at the expense of increased dose differences proximal to and within the target.

Applications of various range shifters for proton pencil beam scanning radiotherapy

Background

A range pull-back device, such as a machine-related range shifter (MRS) or a universal patient-related range shifter (UPRS), is needed in pencil beam scanning technique to treat shallow tumors.

Methods

Three UPRS made by QFix (Avondale, PA, USA) allow treating targets across the body: U-shaped bolus (UB), anterior lateral bolus (ALB), and couch top bolus. Head-and-neck (HN) patients who used the UPRS were tested. The in-air spot sizes were measured and compared in this study at air gaps: 6 cm, 16 cm, and 26 cm. Measurements were performed in a solid water phantom using a single-field optimization pencil beam scanning field with the ALB placed at 0, 10, and 20 cm air gaps. The two-dimensional dose maps at the middle of the spread-out Bragg peak were measured using ion chamber array MatriXX PT (IBA-Dosimetry, Schwarzenbruck, Germany) located at isocenter and compared with the treatment planning system.

Results

A UPRS can be consistently placed close to the patient and maintains a relatively small spot size resulting in improved dose distributions. However, when a UPRS is non-removable (e.g. thick couch top), the quality of volumetric imaging is degraded due to their high Z material construction, hindering the value of Image-Guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT). Limitations of using UPRS with small air gaps include reduced couch weight limit, potential collision with patient or immobilization devices, and challenges using non-coplanar fields with certain UPRS. Our experience showed the combination of a U-shaped bolus exclusively for an HN target and an MRS as the complimentary device for head-and-neck targets as well as for all other treatment sites may be ideal to preserve the dosimetric advantages of pencil beam scanning proton treatments across the body.

Conclusion

We have described how to implement UPRS and MRS for various clinical indications using the PBS technique, and comprehensively reviewed the advantage and disadvantages of UPRS and MRS. We recommend the removable UB only to be employed for the brain and HN treatments while an automated MRS is used for all proton beams that require RS but not convenient or feasible to use UB.

Patient-Reported Outcomes after Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy for Oropharynx Cancer

PURPOSE

To report patient-reported outcomes (PROs) derived from the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head and Neck (FACT-HN) tool, in patients with oropharynx cancer (OPC) treated with intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) in the context of first-course irradiation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with locally advanced OPC treated with radical IMPT between 2011 and 2018 were included in a prospective registry. FACT-HN scores were measured serially during and 24 months following IMPT. PRO changes in the FACT-HN scores over time were assessed with mixed-model analysis.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients met inclusion criteria. Median age was 60 years (range, 41-84), and 91% had human papillomavirus-associated disease. In total, 28% received induction chemotherapy and 68% had concurrent chemotherapy. Compliance to FACT-HN questionnaire completion was 59%, 48%, and 42% at 6, 12, and 24 months after treatment, respectively. The mean FACT-General (G), FACT-Total, and FACT-Trial Outcome Index (TOI) score changes were statistically and clinically significant relative to baseline from week 3 of treatment up to week 2 after treatment. Nadir was reached at week 6 of treatment for all scores, with maximum scores dropping by 15%, 20%, and 39% compared to baseline for FACT-G, FACT-Total, and FACT-TOI, respectively. Subdomain scores of physical well-being, functional well-being, and head and neck additional concerns decreased from baseline during treatment and returned to baseline at week 4 after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

IMPT was associated with a favorable PRO trajectory, characterized by an acute decline followed by rapid recovery to baseline. This study establishes the expected acute, subacute, and chronic trajectory of PROs for patients undergoing IMPT for OPC.

Development and validation of the Dynamic Collimation Monte Carlo simulation package for pencil beam scanning proton therapy

PURPOSE

The aim of this work was to develop and experimentally validate a Dynamic Collimation Monte Carlo (DCMC) simulation package specifically designed for the simulation of collimators in pencil beam scanning proton therapy (PBS-PT). The DCMC package was developed using the TOPAS Monte Carlo platform and consists of a generalized PBS source model and collimator component extensions.

METHODS

A divergent point-source model of the IBA dedicated nozzle (DN) at the Miami Cancer Institute (MCI) was created and validated against on-axis commissioning measurements taken at MCI. The beamline optics were mathematically incorporated into the source to model beamlet deflections in the X and Y directions at the respective magnet planes. Off-axis measurements taken at multiple planes in air were used to validate both the off-axis spot size and divergence of the source model. The DCS trimmers were modeled and incorporated as TOPAS geometry extensions that linearly translate and rotate about the bending magnets. To validate the collimator model, a series of integral depth dose (IDD) and lateral profile measurements were acquired at MCI and used to benchmark the DCMC performance for modeling both pristine and range shifted beamlets. The water equivalent thickness (WET) of the range shifter was determined by quantifying the shift in the depth of the 80% dose point distal to the Bragg peak between the range shifted and pristine uncollimated beams.

RESULTS

A source model of the IBA DN system was successfully commissioned against on- and off-axis IDD and lateral profile measurements performed at MCI. The divergence of the source model was matched through an optimization of the source-to-axis distance and comparison against in-air spot profiles. The DCS model was then benchmarked against collimated IDD and in-air and in-phantom lateral profile measurements. Gamma analysis was used to evaluate the agreement between measured and simulated lateral profiles and IDDs with 1%/1 mm criteria and a 1% dose threshold. For the pristine collimated beams, the average 1%/1 mm gamma pass rates across all collimator configurations investigated were 99.8% for IDDs and 97.6% and 95.2% for in-air and in-phantom lateral profiles. All range shifted collimated IDDs passed at 100% while in-air and in-phantom lateral profiles had average pass rates of 99.1% and 99.8%, respectively. The measured and simulated WET of the polyethylene range shifter was determined to be 40.9 and 41.0 mm, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We have developed a TOPAS-based Monte Carlo package for modeling collimators in PBS-PT. This package was then commissioned to model the IBA DN system and DCS located at MCI using both uncollimated and collimated measurements. Validation results demonstrate that the DCMC package can be used to accurately model other aspects of a DCS implementation via simulation.

Past, present and future of proton therapy for head and neck cancer

Proton therapy has recently gained substantial momentum worldwide due to improved accessibility to the technology and sustained interests in its advantage of better tissue sparing compared to traditional photon radiation. Proton therapy in head and neck cancer has a unique advantage given the complex anatomy and proximity of targets to vital organs. As head and neck cancer patients are living longer due to epidemiological shifts and advances in treatment options, long-term toxicity from radiation treatment has become a major concern that may be better mitigated by proton therapy. With increased utilization of proton therapy, new proton centers breaking ground, and as excitement about the technology continue to increase, we aim to comprehensively review the evidence of proton therapy in major subsites within the head and neck, hoping to facilitate a greater understanding of the full risks and benefits of proton therapy for head and neck cancer.

Salivary Gland Hypofunction and Xerostomia in Head and Neck Radiation Patients

BACKGROUND

The most manifest long-term consequences of radiation therapy in the head and neck cancer patient are salivary gland hypofunction and a sensation of oral dryness (xerostomia).

METHODS

This critical review addresses the consequences of radiation injury to salivary gland tissue, the clinical management of salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia, and current and potential strategies to prevent or reduce radiation injury to salivary gland tissue or restore the function of radiation-injured salivary gland tissue.

RESULTS

Salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia have severe implications for oral functioning, maintenance of oral and general health, and quality of life. Significant progress has been made to spare salivary gland function chiefly due to advances in radiation techniques. Other strategies have also been developed, e.g., radioprotectors, identification and preservation/expansion of salivary stem cells by stimulation with cholinergic muscarinic agonists, and application of new lubricating or stimulatory agents, surgical transfer of submandibular glands, and acupuncture.

CONCLUSION

Many advances to manage salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia induced by radiation therapy still only offer partial protection since they are often of short duration, lack the protective effects of saliva, or potentially have significant adverse effects. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and its next step, proton therapy, have the greatest potential as a management strategy for permanently preserving salivary gland function in head and neck cancer patients.Presently, gene transfer to supplement fluid formation and stem cell transfer to increase the regenerative potential in radiation-damaged salivary glands are promising approaches for regaining function and/or regeneration of radiation-damaged salivary gland tissue.

Impact of different treatment techniques for pediatric Ewing sarcoma of the chest wall: IMRT, 3DCPT, and IMPT with/without beam aperture

Purpose

To evaluate the dosimetric differences between photon intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans, 3D conformal proton therapy (3DCPT), and intensity‐modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plans and to investigate the dosimetric impact of different beam spot size and beam apertures in IMPT for pediatric Ewing sarcoma of the chest wall.

Methods and Materials

Six proton pediatric patients with Ewing sarcoma in the upper, middle, and lower thoracic spine regions as well as upper lumbar spine region were treated with 3DCPT and retrospectively planned with photon IMRT and IMPT nozzles of different beam spot sizes with/without beam apertures. The plan dose distributions were compared both on target conformity and homogeneity, and on organs‐at‐risk (OARs) sparing using QUANTEC metrics of the lung, heart, liver, and kidney. The total integral doses of healthy tissue of all plans were also evaluated.

Results

Target conformity and homogeneity indices are generally better for the IMPT plans with beam aperture. Doses to the lung, heart, and liver for all patients are substantially lower with the 3DPT and IMPT plans than those of IMRT plans. In the IMPT plans with large spot without beam aperture, some OAR doses are higher than those of 3DCPT plans. The integral dose of each photon IMRT plan ranged from 2 to 4.3 times of proton plans.

Conclusion

Compared to IMRT, proton therapy delivers significant lower dose to almost all OARs and much lower healthy tissue integral dose. Compared to 3DCPT, IMPT with small beam spot size or using beam aperture has better dose conformity to the target.

Design of a focused collimator for proton therapy spot scanning using Monte Carlo methods

PURPOSE

When designing a collimation system for pencil beam spot scanning proton therapy, a decision must be made whether or not to rotate, or focus, the collimator to match beamlet deflection as a function of off-axis distance. If the collimator is not focused, the beamlet shape and fluence will vary as a function of off-axis distance due to partial transmission through the collimator. In this work, we quantify the magnitude of these effects and propose a focused dynamic collimation system (DCS) for use in proton therapy spot scanning.

METHODS

This study was done in silico using a model of the Miami Cancer Institute's (MCI) IBA Proteus Plus system created in Geant4-based TOPAS. The DCS utilizes rectangular nickel trimmers mounted on rotating sliders that move in synchrony with the pencil beam to provide focused collimation at the edge of the target. Using a simplified setup of the DCS, simulations were performed at various off-axis locations corresponding to beam deflection angles ranging from 0° to 2.5°. At each off-axis location, focused (trimmer rotated) and unfocused (trimmer not rotated) simulations were performed. In all simulations, a 4 cm water equivalent thickness range shifter was placed upstream of the collimator, and a voxelized water phantom that scored dose was placed downstream, each with 4 cm airgaps.

RESULTS

Increasing the beam deflection angle for an unfocused trimmer caused the collimated edge of the beamlet profile to shift 0.08-0.61 mm from the baseline 0° simulation. There was also an increase in low-dose regions on the collimated edge ranging from 14.6% to 192.4%. Lastly, the maximum dose, D max , was 0-5% higher for the unfocused simulations. With a focused trimmer design, the profile shift and dose increases were all eliminated.

CONCLUSIONS

We have shown that focusing a collimator in spot scanning proton therapy reduces dose at the collimated edge compared to conventional, unfocused collimation devices and presented a simple, mechanical design for achieving focusing for a range of source-to-collimator distances.

[Proton therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: From physics to clinic]

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is presently the recommended technique for the treatment of locally advanced head and neck carcinomas. Proton therapy would allow to reduce the volume of irradiated normal tissue and, thus, to decrease the risk of late dysphagia, xerostomia, dysgeusia and hypothyroidism. An exhaustive research was performed with the search engine PubMed by focusing on the papers about the physical difficulties that slow down use of proton therapy for head and neck carcinomas. Range uncertainties in proton therapy (±3 %) paradoxically limit the use of the steep dose gradient in distality. Calibration uncertainties can be important in the treatment of head and neck cancer in the presence of materials of uncertain stoichiometric composition (such as with metal implants, dental filling, etc.) and complex heterogeneities. Dental management for example may be different with IMRT or proton therapy. Some uncertainties can be somewhat minimized at the time of optimization. Inter- and intrafractional variations and uncertainties in Hounsfield units/stopping power can be integrated in a robust optimization process. Additional changes in patient's anatomy (tumour shrinkage, changes in skin folds in the beam patch, large weight loss or gain) require rescanning. Dosimetric and small clinical studies comparing photon and proton therapy have well shown the interest of proton therapy for head and neck cancers. Intensity-modulated proton therapy is a promising treatment as it can reduce the substantial toxicity burden of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma compared to IMRT. Robust optimization will allow to perform an optimal treatment and to use proton therapy in current clinical practice.

Validation of new 2D ripple filters in proton treatments of spherical geometries and non-small cell lung carcinoma cases

A ripple filter (RiFi) is a passive energy modulator used in scanned particle therapy to broaden the Bragg peak, thus lowering the number of accelerator energies required for homogeneous target coverage, which significantly reduces the irradiation time. As we have previously shown, a new 6 mm thick RiFi with 2D groove shapes produced with 3D printing can be used in carbon ion treatments with a similar target coverage and only a marginally worse planning conformity compared to treatments with in-use 3 mm thick RiFis of an older 1D design. Where RiFis are normally not used with protons due to larger scattering and straggling effects, this new design would be beneficial in proton therapy too. Measurements of proton Bragg curves and lateral beam profiles were carried out for different RiFi designs and thicknesses as well as for no RiFi at the Heidelberg Ionenstrahl-Therapiezentrum. Base data for proton treatment planning were generated with the Monte Carlo code SHIELD-HIT12A with and without the 2D 6 mm RiFi. Plans on spherical targets in water were calculated with TRiP98 for a systematic RiFi performance analysis and for comparisons with carbon ion plans for the same respective energy depth step sizes. Plans for 9 stage I static non small cell lung cancer patients were calculated with Eclipse 13.7.15. Dose-volume-histograms, spatial dose distributions and dosimetric indexes were used for plan evaluation. Measurements confirm the functionality of the new 2D RiFi design, which reduces the beam spot size compared to 1D RiFis of the same thickness. Planning studies show that a 6 mm thick 2D RiFi could be used in proton therapy to lower the irradiation time. Although slightly worse planning conformity and dose homogeneity were found for plans with the RiFi compared to plans without, satisfactory results within the planning objective were obtained for all cases.

Advanced Treatment Planning

Treatment planning for protons and heavier ions is adapting technologies originally developed for photon dose optimization, but also has to meet its particular challenges. Since the quality of the applied dose is more sensitive to geometric uncertainties, treatment plan robust optimization has a much more prominent role in particle therapy. This has led to specific planning tools, approaches, and research into new formulations of the robust optimization problems. Tools for solution space navigation and automatic planning are also being adapted to particle therapy. These challenges become even greater when detailed models of relative biological effectiveness (RBE) are included into dose optimization, as is required for heavier ions.

Intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) - The future of IMRT for head and neck cancer

Radiation therapy plays an integral role in the management of head and neck cancers (HNCs). While most HNC patients have historically been treated with photon-based radiation techniques such as intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), there is a growing awareness of the potential clinical benefits of proton therapy over IMRT in the definitive, postoperative and reirradiation settings given the unique physical properties of protons. Intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT), also known as "pencil beam proton therapy," is a sophisticated mode of proton therapy that is analogous to IMRT and an active area of investigation in cancer care. Multifield optimization IMPT allows for high quality plans that can target superficially located HNCs as well as large neck volumes while significantly reducing integral doses. Several dosimetric studies have demonstrated the superiority of IMPT over IMRT to improve dose sparing of nearby organs such as the larynx, salivary glands, and esophagus. Evidence of the clinical translation of these dosimetric advantages has been demonstrated with documented toxicity reductions (such as decreased feeding tube dependency) after IMPT for patients with HNCs. While there are relative challenges to IMPT planning that exist today such as particle range uncertainties and high sensitivity to anatomical changes, ongoing investigations in image-guidance techniques and robust optimization methods are promising. A systematic approach towards utilizing IMPT and additional prospective studies are necessary in order to more accurately estimate the clinical benefit of IMPT over IMRT and passive proton therapy on a case-by-case basis for patients with sub-site specific HNCs.

A robust intensity modulated proton therapy optimizer based on Monte Carlo dose calculation

PURPOSE

Accuracy of dose calculation models and robustness under various uncertainties are key factors influencing the quality of intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plans. To mitigate the effects of uncertainties and to improve the dose calculation accuracy, an all-scenario robust IMPT optimization based on accurate Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculation was developed.

METHODS

In the all-scenario robust IMPT optimization, dose volume histograms (DVHs) were computed for the nominal case and for each uncertainty scenario. All scenarios were weighted by DVH values dynamically throughout optimization iterations. In contrast, probabilistic approach weighted scenarios with fixed scenario weights and worst case optimizations picked one single scenario - the worst scenario for each iteration. Uncertainties in patient setup and proton range were considered in all clinical cases studied. Graphics processing unit (GPU) computation was employed to reduce the computational time in both the MC dose calculation and optimization stages. A previously published adaptive quasi-Newton method for proton optimization was extended to include robustness. To validate the all-scenario algorithm extension, it was compared with the single scenario optimization target volume (OTV) based approach in clinical cases of three different disease sites. Additional comparisons with worst case optimization methods were conducted to evaluate the performance of the all-scenario robust optimization against other robust optimizations.

RESULTS

The all-scenario robust IMPT optimization spared organs at risk (OARs) better than the OTV-based method while maintaining target coverage and improving the robustness of targets and OARs. Compared with composite and voxel-wise worst case optimization, the all-scenario robust optimization converged faster, and arrived at solutions of tighter DVH robustness spread, better target coverage and lower OAR dose.

CONCLUSION

An all-scenario robust IMPT treatment planning system was developed using an adaptive quasi-Newton optimization method. The optimization system was GPU-accelerated and based on MC dose calculation. Improved performance was observed in clinical cases when compared with worst case optimization methods.

Development, commissioning, and evaluation of a new intensity modulated minibeam proton therapy system

PURPOSE

To invent, design, construct, and commission an intensity modulated minibeam proton therapy system (IMMPT) without the need for physical collimation and to compare its resulting conformity to a conventional IMPT system.

METHODS

A proton therapy system (Hitachi, Ltd, Hitachi City, Japan; Model: Probeat-V) was specially modified to produce scanned minibeams without collimation. We performed integral depth dose acquisitions and calibrations using a large diameter parallel-plate ionization chamber in a scanning water phantom (PTW, Freiburg, Germany; Models: Bragg Peak ionization chamber, MP3-P). Spot size and shape was measured using radiochromic film (Ashland Advanced Materials, Bridgewater NJ; Type: EBT3), and a synthetic diamond diode type scanned point by point in air (PTW Models: MicroDiamond, MP3-P). The measured data were used as inputs to generate a Monte Carlo-based model for a commercial radiotherapy planning system (TPS) (Varian Medical Systems, Inc., Palo Alto, CA; Model: Eclipse v13.7.15). The regular ProBeat-V system (sigma ~2.5 mm) TPS model was available for comparison. A simulated base of skull case with small and medium targets proximal to brainstem was planned for both systems and compared.

RESULTS

The spot sigma is determined to be 1.4 mm at 221 MeV at the isocenter and below 1 mm at proximal distances. Integral depth doses were indistinguishable from the standard spot commissioning data. The TPS fit the spot profiles closely, giving a residual error maximum of 2.5% in the spot penumbra tails (below 5% of maximum) from the commissioned energies 69.4 to 221.3 MeV. The resulting IMMPT plans were more conformal than the IMPT plans due to a sharper dose gradient (90-10%) 1.5 mm smaller for the small target, and 1.3 mm for the large target, at a representative central axial water equivalent depth of 7 cm.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed, implemented, and tested a new IMMPT system. The initial results look promising in cases where treatments can benefit from additional dose sparing to neighboring sensitive structures.

Synchrotron-Based Pencil Beam Scanning Nozzle with an Integrated Mini-Ridge Filter: A Dosimetric Study to Optimize Treatment Delivery

A mini-ridge filter is often used to widen the Bragg peak in the longitudinal direction at low energies but not high energies. To facilitate the clinical use of a mini-ridge filter, we performed a planning study for the feasibility of a mini-ridge filter as an integral part of the synchrotron nozzle (IMRF). Dose models with and without IMRF were commissioned in a commercial Treatment planning system (TPS). Dosimetric characteristics in a homogenous water phantom were compared between plans with and without IMRF for a fixed spread-out Bragg peak width of 4 cm with distal ranges varying from 8 to 30 g/cm². Six clinical cases were then used to compare the plan quality between plans. The delivery efficiency was also compared between plans in both the phantom and the clinical cases. The Bragg peak width was increased by 0.18 cm at the lowest energy and by only about 0.04 cm at the highest energy. The IMRF increased the spot size (σ) by up to 0.1 cm at the lowest energy and by only 0.02 cm at the highest energy. For the phantom, the IMRF negligibly affected dose at high energies but increased the lateral penumbra by up to 0.12 cm and the distal penumbra by up to 0.06 cm at low energies. For the clinical cases, the IMRF slightly increased dose to the organs at risk. However, the beam delivery time was reduced from 18.5% to 47.1% for the lung, brain, scalp, and head and neck cases, and dose uniformities of target were improved up to 2.9% for these cases owing to the reduced minimum monitor unit effect. In conclusion, integrating a mini-ridge filter into a synchrotron nozzle is feasible for improving treatment efficiency without significantly sacrificing the plan quality.

Evaluation of dosimetric advantages of using patient-specific aperture system with intensity-modulated proton therapy for the shallow depth tumor

In this study, we evaluate dosimetric advantages of using patient-specific aperture system with intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for head and neck tumors at the shallow depth. We used four types of patient-specific aperture system (PSAS) to irradiate shallow regions less than 4 g/cm² with a sharp lateral penumbra. Ten head and neck IMPT plans with or without aperture were optimized separately with the same 95% prescription dose and same dose constraint for organs at risk (OARs). The plans were compared using dose volume histograms (DVHs), dose distributions, and some dose indexes such as volume receiving 50% of the prescribed dose (V₅₀ ), mean or maximum dose (D_mean and D_max ) to the OARs. All examples verified in this study had decreased V₅₀ and OAR doses. Average, maximum, and minimum relative reductions of V₅₀ were 15.4%, 38.9%, and 1.0%, respectively. D_max and D_mean of OARs were decreased by 0.3% to 25.7% and by 1.0% to 46.3%, respectively. The plans with the aperture over more than half of the field showed decreased V₅₀ or OAR dose by more than 10%. The dosimetric advantage of patient-specific apertures with IMPT was clarified in many cases. The PSAS has some dosimetric advantages for clinical use, and in some cases, it enables to fulfill dose constraints.

Impact of model and dose uncertainty on model-based selection of oropharyngeal cancer patients for proton therapy

BACKGROUND

Proton therapy is becoming increasingly available, so it is important to apply objective and individualized patient selection to identify those who are expected to benefit most from proton therapy compared to conventional intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Comparative treatment planning using normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) evaluation has recently been proposed. This work investigates the impact of NTCP model and dose uncertainties on model-based patient selection.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We used IMRT and intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) treatment plans of 78 oropharyngeal cancer patients, which were generated based on automated treatment planning and evaluated based on three published NTCP models. A reduction in NTCP of more than a certain threshold (e.g. 10% lower NTCP) leads to patient selection for IMPT, referred to as 'nominal' selection. To simulate the effect of uncertainties in NTCP-model coefficients (based on reported confidence intervals) and planned doses on the accuracy of model-based patient selection, the Monte Carlo method was used to sample NTCP-model coefficients and doses from a probability distribution centered at their nominal values. Patient selection accuracy within a certain sample was defined as the fraction of patients which had similar selection in both the 'nominal' and 'sampled' scenario.

RESULTS

For all three NTCP models, the median patient selection accuracy was found to be above 70% when only NTCP-model uncertainty was considered. Selection accuracy decreased with increasing uncertainty resulting from differences between planned and delivered dose. In case of excessive dose uncertainty, selection accuracy decreased to 60%.

CONCLUSION

Model and dose uncertainty highly influence the accuracy of model-based patient selection for proton therapy. A reduction of NTCP-model uncertainty is necessary to reach more accurate model-based patient selection.

The impact of treatment accuracy on proton therapy patient selection for oropharyngeal cancer patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The impact of treatment accuracy on NTCP-based patient selection for proton therapy is currently unknown. This study investigates this impact for oropharyngeal cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data of 78 patients was used to automatically generate treatment plans for a simultaneously integrated boost prescribing 70 Gy_RBE/54.25 Gy_RBE in 35 fractions. IMRT treatment plans were generated with three different margins; intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plans for five different setup and range robustness settings. Four NTCP models were evaluated. Patients were selected for proton therapy if NTCP reduction was ≥10% or ≥5% for grade II or III complications, respectively.

RESULTS

The degree of robustness had little impact on patient selection for tube feeding dependence, while the margin had. For other complications the impact of the robustness setting was noticeably higher. For high-precision IMRT (3 mm margin) and high-precision IMPT (3 mm setup/3% range error), most patients were selected for proton therapy based on problems swallowing solid food (51.3%) followed by tube feeding dependence (37.2%), decreased parotid flow (29.5%), and patient-rated xerostomia (7.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment accuracy has a significant impact on the number of patients selected for proton therapy. Therefore, it cannot be ignored in estimating the number of patients for proton therapy.

Empowering Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Through Physics and Technology: An Overview

Considering the clinical potential of protons attributable to their physical characteristics, interest in proton therapy has increased greatly in this century, as has the number of proton therapy installations. Until recently, passively scattered proton therapy was used almost entirely. Notably, the overall clinical results to date have not shown a convincing benefit of protons over photons. A rapid transition is now occurring with the implementation of the most advanced form of proton therapy, intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT). IMPT is superior to passively scattered proton therapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) dosimetrically. However, numerous limitations exist in the present IMPT methods. In particular, compared with IMRT, IMPT is highly vulnerable to various uncertainties. In this overview we identify three major areas of current limitations of IMPT: treatment planning, treatment delivery, and motion management, and discuss current and future efforts for improvement. For treatment planning, we need to reduce uncertainties in proton range and in computed dose distributions, improve robust planning and optimization, enhance adaptive treatment planning and delivery, and consider how to exploit the variability in the relative biological effectiveness of protons for clinical benefit. The quality of proton therapy also depends on the characteristics of the IMPT delivery systems and image guidance. Efforts are needed to optimize the beamlet spot size for both improved dose conformality and faster delivery. For the latter, faster energy switching time and increased dose rate are also needed. Real-time in-room volumetric imaging for guiding IMPT is in its early stages with cone beam computed tomography (CT) and CT-on-rails, and continued improvements are anticipated. In addition, imaging of the proton beams themselves, using, for instance, prompt γ emissions, is being developed to determine the proton range and to reduce range uncertainty. With the realization of the advances described above, we posit that IMPT, thus empowered, will lead to substantially improved clinical results.

Linear energy transfer distributions in the brainstem depending on tumour location in intensity-modulated proton therapy of paediatric cancer

BACKGROUND

For tumours near organs at risk, there is concern about unintended increase in biological dose from elevated linear energy transfer (LET) at the distal end of treatment fields. The objective of this study was therefore to investigate how different paediatric posterior fossa tumour locations impact LET and biological dose to the brainstem during intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Multiple IMPT plans were generated for four different simulated tumour locations relative to the brainstem for a five-year-old male patient. A prescribed dose of 59.4 Gy(RBE) was applied to the planning target volumes (PTVs). Plans with two lateral and one posterior non-coplanar fields were created, along with plans with modified field arrangements. The dose-averaged LET (LET_d) and the physical dose × RBE_LET (D × RBE_LET), where RBE_LET=1+c × LET_d, were calculated using the FLUKA Monte Carlo code. A scaling parameter c was applied to make the RBE_LET represent variations in the biological effect due to LET.

RESULTS

High LET_d values surrounded parts of the PTV and encompassed portions of the brainstem. Mean LET_d values in the brainstem were 3.2-6.6 keV/μm. The highest absolute brainstem LET_d values were seen with the tumour located most distant from the brainstem, whereas lower and more homogeneous LET_d values were seen when the tumour invaded the brainstem. In contrast, the highest mean D × RBE_LET values were found in the latter case (54.0 Gy(RBE)), while the case with largest distance between tumour and brainstem had a mean D × RBE_LET of 1.8 Gy(RBE).

CONCLUSIONS

Using IMPT to treat posterior fossa tumours may result in high LET_d values within the brainstem, particularly if the tumour volume is separated from the brainstem. However, the D × RBE_LET was greater for tumours that approached or invaded the brainstem. Changing field angles showed a reduction of LET_d and D × RBE_LET in the brainstem.

Technical Note: A treatment plan comparison between dynamic collimation and a fixed aperture during spot scanning proton therapy for brain treatment

PURPOSE

To quantitatively assess the advantages of energy-layer specific dynamic collimation system (DCS) versus a per-field fixed aperture for spot scanning proton therapy (SSPT).

METHODS

Five brain cancer patients previously planned and treated with SSPT were replanned using an in-house treatment planning system capable of modeling collimated and uncollimated proton beamlets. The uncollimated plans, which served as a baseline for comparison, reproduced the target coverage and organ-at-risk sparing of the clinically delivered plans. The collimator opening for the fixed aperture-based plans was determined from the combined cross sections of the target in the beam's eye view over all energy layers which included an additional margin equivalent to the maximum beamlet displacement for the respective energy of that energy layer. The DCS-based plans were created by selecting appropriate collimator positions for each row of beam spots during a Raster-style scanning pattern which were optimized to maximize the dose contributions to the target and limited the dose delivered to adjacent normal tissue.

RESULTS

The reduction of mean dose to normal tissue adjacent to the target, as defined by a 10 mm ring surrounding the target, averaged 13.65% (range: 11.8%-16.9%) and 5.18% (2.9%-7.1%) for the DCS and fixed aperture plans, respectively. The conformity index, as defined by the ratio of the volume of the 50% isodose line to the target volume, yielded an average improvement of 21.35% (19.4%-22.6%) and 8.38% (4.7%-12.0%) for the DCS and fixed aperture plans, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The ability of the DCS to provide collimation to each energy layer yielded better conformity in comparison to fixed aperture plans.

Contour scanning for penumbra improvement in pencil beam scanned proton therapy

Proton therapy, especially in the form of pencil beam scanning (PBS), allows for the delivery of highly conformal dose distributions for complex tumor geometries. However, due to scattering of protons inside the patient, lateral dose gradients cannot be arbitrarily steep, which is of importance in cases with organs at risk (OARs) in close proximity to, or overlapping with, planning target volumes (PTVs). In the PBS approach, physical pencil beams are planned using a regular grid orthogonal to the beam direction. In this work, we propose an alternative to this commonly used approach where pencil beams are placed on an irregular grid along concentric paths based on the target contour. Contour driven pencil beam placement is expected to improve dose confirmation by allowing the optimizer to best enhance the penumbra of irregularly shaped targets using edge enhancement. Its effectiveness has been shown to improve dose confirmation to the target volume and reduce doses to OARs in head-and-neck planning studies. Furthermore, the deliverability of such plans, as well as the dosimetric improvements over conventional grid-based plans, have been confirmed in first phantom based verifications.

Toward improved target conformity for two spot scanning proton therapy delivery systems using dynamic collimation

PURPOSE

To quantify improvement in target conformity in brain and head and neck tumor treatments resulting from the use of a dynamic collimation system (DCS) with two spot scanning proton therapy delivery systems (universal nozzle, UN, and dedicated nozzle, DN) with median spot sizes of 5.2 and 3.2 mm over a range of energies from 100 to 230 MeV.

METHODS

Uncollimated and collimated plans were calculated with both UN and DN beam models implemented within our in-house treatment planning system for five brain and ten head and neck datasets in patients previously treated with spot scanning proton therapy. The prescription dose and beam angles from the clinical plans were used for both the UN and DN plans. The average reduction of the mean dose to the 10-mm ring surrounding the target between the uncollimated and collimated plans was calculated for the UN and the DN. Target conformity was analyzed using the mean dose to 1-mm thickness rings surrounding the target at increasing distances ranging from 1 to 10 mm.

RESULTS

The average reductions of the 10-mm ring mean dose for the UN and DN plans were 13.7% (95% CI: 11.6%-15.7%; p < 0.0001) and 11.5% (95% CI: 9.5%-13.5%; p < 0.0001) across all brain cases and 7.1% (95% CI: 4.4%-9.8%; p < 0.001) and 6.3% (95% CI: 3.7%-9.0%; p < 0.001), respectively, across all head and neck cases. The collimated UN plans were either more conformal (all brain cases and 60% of the head and neck cases) than or equivalent (40% of the head and neck cases) to the uncollimated DN plans. The collimated DN plans offered the highest conformity.

CONCLUSIONS

The DCS added either to the UN or DN improved the target conformity. The DCS may be of particular interest for sites with UN systems looking for a more economical solution than upgrading the nozzle to improve the target conformity of their spot scanning proton therapy system.

Comparison of organ-at-risk sparing and plan robustness for spot-scanning proton therapy and volumetric modulated arc photon therapy in head-and-neck cancer

PURPOSE

Proton radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer (HNC) aims to improve organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing over photon radiotherapy. However, it may be less robust for setup and range uncertainties. The authors investigated OAR sparing and plan robustness for spot-scanning proton planning techniques and compared these with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) photon plans.

METHODS

Ten HNC patients were replanned using two arc VMAT (RapidArc) and spot-scanning proton techniques. OARs to be spared included the contra- and ipsilateral parotid and submandibular glands and individual swallowing muscles. Proton plans were made using Multifield Optimization (MFO, using three, five, and seven fields) and Single-field Optimization (SFO, using three fields). OAR sparing was evaluated using mean dose to composite salivary glands (CompSal) and composite swallowing muscles (CompSwal). Plan robustness was determined for setup and range uncertainties (±3 mm for setup, ±3% HU) evaluating V95% and V107% for clinical target volumes.

RESULTS

Averaged over all patients CompSal/CompSwal mean doses were lower for the three-field MFO plans (14.6/16.4 Gy) compared to the three-field SFO plans (20.0/23.7 Gy) and VMAT plans (23.0/25.3 Gy). Using more than three fields resulted in differences in OAR sparing of less than 1.5 Gy between plans. SFO plans were significantly more robust than MFO plans. VMAT plans were the most robust.

CONCLUSIONS

MFO plans had improved OAR sparing but were less robust than SFO and VMAT plans, while SFO plans were more robust than MFO plans but resulted in less OAR sparing. Robustness of the MFO plans did not increase with more fields.

Metabolic liver function after stereotactic body radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

Purpose The time course of changes of the liver function after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) was analyzed in patients treated for non-resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Patients and methods Twenty-six patients with non-resectable HCC treated with SBRT were included in this study. Clinical, biochemical and treatment-related parameters were retrospectively collected. S-albumin, s-bilirubin, s-alkaline phosphatase (AP) and s-alanine transaminase (ALAT) at 0, 3, 6, and 12 months after radiotherapy were analyzed. Results Seventeen and nine patients were Child-Pugh class A and B, respectively. The liver was exposed to relatively high radiation doses with mean doses of 1.9-26 Gy. None of the patients developed classic radiotherapy-induced liver disease (RILD), but two patients developed non-classic RILD. Two patients developed grade 3 ascites and no grade 4-5 toxicities were observed. Six patients declined in Child-Pugh class. The s-albumin decreased significantly from a pretreatment median of 37.4-34.36 g/l at three months after SBRT and stabilized thereafter. S-bilirubin, s-AP and s-ALAT did not change significantly over the study period. Conclusion Despite the fact that patients received high radiation dose to the liver, there was only moderate morbidity related to the treatment. The s-albumin decreases over three months after SBRT reflecting minor to moderate hepatic toxicity. S-albumin should be observed in the follow-up of HCC patients treated with SBRT.

Dosimetric advantages of intensity-modulated proton therapy for oropharyngeal cancer compared with intensity-modulated radiation: A case-matched control analysis

A potential advantage of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) over intensity-modulated (photon) radiation therapy (IMRT) in the treatment of oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC) is lower radiation dose to several critical structures involved in the development of nausea and vomiting, mucositis, and dysphagia. The purpose of this study was to quantify doses to critical structures for patients with OPC treated with IMPT and compare those with doses on IMRT plans generated for the same patients and with a matched cohort of patients actually treated with IMRT. In this study, 25 patients newly diagnosed with OPC were treated with IMPT between 2011 and 2012. Comparison IMRT plans were generated for these patients and for additional IMRT-treated controls extracted from a database of patients with OPC treated between 2000 and 2009. Cases were matched based on the following criteria, in order: unilateral vs bilateral therapy, tonsil vs base of tongue primary, T-category, N-category, concurrent chemotherapy, induction chemotherapy, smoking status, sex, and age. Results showed that the mean doses to the anterior and posterior oral cavity, hard palate, larynx, mandible, and esophagus were significantly lower with IMPT than with IMRT comparison plans generated for the same cohort, as were doses to several central nervous system structures involved in the nausea and vomiting response. Similar differences were found when comparing dose to organs at risks (OARs) between the IMPT cohort and the case-matched IMRT cohort. In conclusion, these findings suggest that patients with OPC treated with IMPT may experience fewer and less severe side effects during therapy. This may be the result of decreased beam path toxicities with IMPT due to lower doses to several dysphagia, odynophagia, and nausea and vomiting-associated OARs. Further study is needed to evaluate differences in long-term disease control and chronic toxicity between patients with OPC treated with IMPT in comparison to those treated with IMRT.

Improving Head and Neck Cancer Treatments Using Dynamic Collimation in Spot Scanning Proton Therapy

Purpose

Interest in using collimation for spot scanning proton therapy has recently increased in an attempt to improve the lateral penumbra. To investigate the advantages of such an approach for complex targets, a plan comparison between uncollimated and collimated beam spots was performed for patients with head and neck cancer.

Patients and Methods

For 10 patients with head and neck cancer, previously treated with spot scanning proton therapy, uncollimated and collimated treatment plans were created using an in-house treatment-planning system capable of modeling asymmetric-beamlet dose distributions resulting from the use of a dynamic collimation system. Both uncollimated and collimated plans reproduced clinically delivered plans in terms of target coverage. A relative plan comparison was performed using both physical and radiobiological metrics on the organs at risk.

Results

The dynamic collimation system improved dose-distribution conformity while preserving target coverage. The median reduction of the mean dose to the esophagus, uninvolved larynx, and uninvolved parotids were -11.9% (minimum to maximum, -6.4% to -24.1%), -7.2% (-0.8% to -60.1%), and -5.2% (-0.2% to -21.5%), respectively, and depended on the organ location relative to the target and radiation beam angle. The collimation did not improve dose to some organs at risk surrounded by the target or located upstream of Bragg peaks because of the priority on the target coverage.

Conclusion

In spot scanning proton therapy, the dynamic collimation system generally affords better target conformity, which results in improvement in organ-at-risk sparing in the head and neck region while preserving target coverage. However, the benefits of collimation and the increased complexity should be considered for each patient. Patients with large bilateral targets or organs at risk surrounded by the target showed the least benefit.

Impact of Spot Size and Beam-Shaping Devices on the Treatment Plan Quality for Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy

PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess the clinical impact of spot size and the addition of apertures and range compensators on the treatment quality of pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy and to define when PBS could improve on passive scattering proton therapy (PSPT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The patient cohort included 14 pediatric patients treated with PSPT. Six PBS plans were created and optimized for each patient using 3 spot sizes (∼12-, 5.4-, and 2.5-mm median sigma at isocenter for 90- to 230-MeV range) and adding apertures and compensators to plans with the 2 larger spots. Conformity and homogeneity indices, dose-volume histogram parameters, equivalent uniform dose (EUD), normal tissue complication probability (NTCP), and integral dose were quantified and compared with the respective PSPT plans.

RESULTS

The results clearly indicated that PBS with the largest spots does not necessarily offer a dosimetric or clinical advantage over PSPT. With comparable target coverage, the mean dose (Dmean) to healthy organs was on average 6.3% larger than PSPT when using this spot size. However, adding apertures to plans with large spots improved the treatment quality by decreasing the average Dmean and EUD by up to 8.6% and 3.2% of the prescribed dose, respectively. Decreasing the spot size further improved all plans, lowering the average Dmean and EUD by up to 11.6% and 10.9% compared with PSPT, respectively, and eliminated the need for beam-shaping devices. The NTCP decreased with spot size and addition of apertures, with maximum reduction of 5.4% relative to PSPT.

CONCLUSIONS

The added benefit of using PBS strongly depends on the delivery configurations. Facilities limited to large spot sizes (>∼8 mm median sigma at isocenter) are recommended to use apertures to reduce treatment-related toxicities, at least for complex and/or small tumors.

A dynamic collimation system for penumbra reduction in spot-scanning proton therapy: proof of concept

PURPOSE

In the absence of a collimation system the lateral penumbra of spot scanning (SS) dose distributions delivered by low energy proton beams is highly dependent on the spot size. For current commercial equipment, spot size increases with decreasing proton energy thereby reducing the benefit of the SS technique. This paper presents a dynamic collimation system (DCS) for sharpening the lateral penumbra of proton therapy dose distributions delivered by SS.

METHODS

The collimation system presented here exploits the property that a proton pencil beam used for SS requires collimation only when it is near the target edge, enabling the use of trimmers that are in motion at times when the pencil beam is away from the target edge. The device consists of two pairs of parallel nickel trimmer blades of 2 cm thickness and dimensions of 2 cm×18 cm in the beam's eye view. The two pairs of trimmer blades are rotated 90° relative to each other to form a rectangular shape. Each trimmer blade is capable of rapid motion in the direction perpendicular to the central beam axis by means of a linear motor, with maximum velocity and acceleration of 2.5 m/s and 19.6 m/s2, respectively. The blades travel on curved tracks to match the divergence of the proton source. An algorithm for selecting blade positions is developed to minimize the dose delivered outside of the target, and treatment plans are created both with and without the DCS.

RESULTS

The snout of the DCS has outer dimensions of 22.6×22.6 cm2 and is capable of delivering a minimum treatment field size of 15×15 cm2. Using currently available components, the constructed system would weigh less than 20 kg. For irregularly shaped fields, the use of the DCS reduces the mean dose outside of a 2D target of 46.6 cm2 by approximately 40% as compared to an identical plan without collimation. The use of the DCS increased treatment time by 1-3 s per energy layer.

CONCLUSIONS

The spread of the lateral penumbra of low-energy SS proton treatments may be greatly reduced with the use of this system at the cost of only a small penalty in delivery time.

Shortening delivery times of intensity modulated proton therapy by reducing proton energy layers during treatment plan optimization

PURPOSE

To shorten delivery times of intensity modulated proton therapy by reducing the number of energy layers in the treatment plan.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We have developed an energy layer reduction method, which was implemented into our in-house-developed multicriteria treatment planning system "Erasmus-iCycle." The method consisted of 2 components: (1) minimizing the logarithm of the total spot weight per energy layer; and (2) iteratively excluding low-weighted energy layers. The method was benchmarked by comparing a robust "time-efficient plan" (with energy layer reduction) with a robust "standard clinical plan" (without energy layer reduction) for 5 oropharyngeal cases and 5 prostate cases. Both plans of each patient had equal robust plan quality, because the worst-case dose parameters of the standard clinical plan were used as dose constraints for the time-efficient plan. Worst-case robust optimization was performed, accounting for setup errors of 3 mm and range errors of 3% + 1 mm. We evaluated the number of energy layers and the expected delivery time per fraction, assuming 30 seconds per beam direction, 10 ms per spot, and 400 Giga-protons per minute. The energy switching time was varied from 0.1 to 5 seconds.

RESULTS

The number of energy layers was on average reduced by 45% (range, 30%-56%) for the oropharyngeal cases and by 28% (range, 25%-32%) for the prostate cases. When assuming 1, 2, or 5 seconds energy switching time, the average delivery time was shortened from 3.9 to 3.0 minutes (25%), 6.0 to 4.2 minutes (32%), or 12.3 to 7.7 minutes (38%) for the oropharyngeal cases, and from 3.4 to 2.9 minutes (16%), 5.2 to 4.2 minutes (20%), or 10.6 to 8.0 minutes (24%) for the prostate cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Delivery times of intensity modulated proton therapy can be reduced substantially without compromising robust plan quality. Shorter delivery times are likely to reduce treatment uncertainties and costs.

A method to select aperture margin in collimated spot scanning proton therapy

The use of collimator or aperture may sharpen the lateral dose gradient for spot scanning proton therapy. However, to date, there has not been a standard method to determine the aperture margin for a single field in collimated spot scanning proton therapy. This study describes a theoretical framework to select the optimal aperture margin for a single field, and also presents the spot spacing limit required such that the optimal aperture margin exists. Since, for a proton pencil beam partially intercepted by collimator, the maximum point dose (spot center) shifts away from the original pencil beam central axis, we propose that the optimal margin should be equal to the maximum pencil beam center shift under the condition that spot spacing is small with respect to the maximum pencil beam center shift, which can be numerically determined based on beam modeling data. A test case is presented which demonstrates agreement with the prediction made based on the proposed methods. When apertures are applied in a commercial treatment planning system this method may be implemented.

IMRT with concomitant boost versus conventional radiation in the setting of sequential chemoradiotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer

Objectives

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of IMRT with concomitant boost simultaneous integrated boost-intensity modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) compared with conventional radiation in the setting of sequential chemoradiotherapy (induction chemoradiotherapy(ICRT)) for patients with advanced oropharynx cancer (OPC).

Materials and methods

A single-institutional retrospective review was conducted on 84 patients (conventional radiation,n= 36; SIB-IMRT,n= 48) with stage III and IV OPC, who underwent definitive ICRT from 2002 to 2012. The study endpoints included overall survival (OS) and locoregional control (LRC).

Results

The median follow-up of the matched cohorts resulted similar (30 months for 3D-radiation technique versus 37 months for IMRT), and baseline characteristics were generally balanced between the two groups. However, patients managed with conventional radiation were less likely to have positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) for staging and to receive induction chemotherapy with TPF. A multivariate Cox proportional hazard model showed that OS and LRC were associated with several known prognostic factors, along with radiation modality (SIB-IMRT versus conventional radiation, hazard ratio 0·27,p= 0·004; hazard ratio 0·31,p= 0·006; for OS and LRC, respectively).

Conclusions

The adoption of SIB-IMRTversusconventional radiation may produce a clinical benefit in OS and LRC among patients receiving ICRT for advanced OPC.