The Essential Role of Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Merkel Cell Carcinoma: A Study From the Rare Cancer Network

Head and Neck Merkel Cell Carcinoma: Therapeutic Benefit of Adjuvant Radiotherapy for Nodal Disease

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the therapeutic effect of post-operative radiotherapy (PORT) with respect to nodal status among patients with head and neck Merkel cell carcinoma (HNMCC).

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we queried Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) dataset from 2000 through 2019. We included all adult patients who received primary surgical resection for histologically confirmed treatment naive HNMCC. Entropy balancing was used to reweight observations such that there was covariate balance between patients who received PORT and patients who received surgical resection alone. Doubly robust estimation was achieved by incorporating weights into a multivariable cox proportional hazards model. Planned post hoc subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of PORT by pathological node status.

RESULTS

Among 752 patients (mean age, 73.3 years [SD 10.8]; 64.2% male; 91.2% White; 41.9% node-positive), 60.4% received PORT. Among node-positive patients, we found that PORT was associated with improved overall survival (OS) (aHR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.37-0.81; p = 0.003) and improved disease-specific survival (DSS) (aHR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.35-0.92; p = 0.022). Among node-negative patients, we found that PORT was not associated with OS and was associated with worse DSS (aHR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.30-4.23; p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that PORT was associated with improved OS and DSS for node-positive patients and worse DSS for node-negative patients. For HNMCC treated with primary surgical resection, these data confirm the value of PORT for pathologically node-positive patients and support the use of single modality surgical therapy for pathologically node-negative patients without other adverse risk factors.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 134:3587-3594, 2024.

Exploring diagnosis and therapeutic complexities of an aggressive Merkel cell carcinoma: A case report and review of the literature

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive and rare cutaneous neuroendocrine carcinoma that predominantly affects the sun-damaged skin of the head and neck region, extremities, and trunk of older white individuals. Microscopically, MCC is characterized by nests or sheets of uniform small round blue cells with scant cytoplasm, granular nuclei with a salt-and-pepper chromatin pattern, high proliferative activity, and occasional necrosis. They are usually positive for epithelial and neuroendocrine markers, particularly for cytokeratin 20 and AE1/AE3 in a paranuclear dot-like staining. We herein contribute by reporting a case of MCC affecting the auricular pavilion of a 66-year-old female patient from Campinas, Brazil. Additionally, a review of the current literature is also included to analyze all the cases that have been reported in the English-language literature, totalizing 27 cases of MCC on the external ear. The 5-year overall survival rate for individuals with localized MCC is 50% and the most common treatment choice is the combination of surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy and sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Moderne Diagnostik und Therapie des Merkelzellkarzinoms

Das Merkelzellkarzinom (MCC) ist ein seltener, aggressiver Hauttumor mit epithelialer und neuroendokriner Differenzierung, dessen Inzidenz in den letzten Jahrzehnten deutlich zugenommen hat. Risikofaktoren sind fortgeschrittenes Lebensalter, heller Hauttyp, UV‐Exposition und Immunsuppression. Pathogenetisch wird ein durch das Merkelzell‐Polyomavirus (MCPyV) hervorgerufener Typ von einem UV‐induzierten Typ mit hoher Tumormutationslast unterschieden.

Klinisch präsentiert sich das MCC als meist schmerzloser, schnell wachsender, rötlich‐violetter Tumor mit glänzender Oberfläche, der bevorzugt im Kopf‐Hals‐Bereich und an den distalen Extremitäten lokalisiert ist. Eine sichere Diagnose kann nur anhand histologischer und immunhistochemischer Merkmale gestellt werden. Bei Erstdiagnose weisen 20%–26% der Patienten lokoregionäre Metastasen und 8%–14% Fernmetastasen auf, weshalb eine Ausbreitungsdiagnostik unabdingbar ist. Bei fehlenden klinischen Hinweisen auf Metastasen wird eine Sentinel‐Lymphknotenbiopsie empfohlen.

Wesentliche Säulen der Therapie sind die Operation, die adjuvante oder palliative Strahlentherapie und in fortgeschrittenen inoperablen Stadien die medikamentöse Tumortherapie. Die Einführung von Immuncheckpoint‐Inhibitoren führte zu einem Paradigmenwechsel, da sich hiermit ein wesentlich langfristigeres Ansprechen und bessere Überlebensraten als mit Chemotherapie erreichen lassen. Zur Therapie des metastasierten MCC ist in Deutschland der PD‐L1‐Inhibitor Avelumab zugelassen, aber auch die PD‐1‐Antikörper Pembrolizumab und Nivolumab werden mit Erfolg eingesetzt. Adjuvante und neoadjuvante Therapiekonzepte, Immunkombinationstherapien und zielgerichtete Therapien als Monotherapie oder in Kombination mit Immuncheckpoint‐Inhibitoren befinden sich in klinischer Prüfung.

Modern diagnostics and treatment of Merkel cell carcinoma

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive skin cancer with epithelial and neuroendocrine differentiation, the incidence of which has increased substantially during the last decades. Risk factors include advanced age, fair skin type, UV exposure, and immunosuppression. Pathogenetically, a type caused by the Merkel cell polyomavirus is distinguished from a UV-induced type with a high tumor mutational burden. Clinically, MCC presents as a mostly painless, rapidly growing, reddish-violet tumor with a shiny surface, which is preferentially localized in the head-neck region and at the distal extremities. A reliable diagnosis can only be made based on histological and immunohistochemical features. At initial diagnosis, 20-26% of patients show locoregional metastases and 8-14% distant metastases, making staging examinations indispensable. If there is no clinical evidence of metastases, a sentinel lymph node biopsy is recommended. Essential columns of therapy are surgery, adjuvant or palliative radiotherapy and, in advanced inoperable stages, medicamentous tumor therapy. The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors has led to a paradigm shift, as they provide a considerably longer duration of response and better survival rates than chemotherapy. The PD-L1 inhibitor avelumab is approved for treatment of metastatic MCC in Germany, but the PD-1 antibodies pembrolizumab and nivolumab are also used with success. Adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment concepts, immune combination therapies and targeted therapies as monotherapy or in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors are in the clinical trial phase.

The Evolving Treatment Landscape of Merkel Cell Carcinoma

OPINION STATEMENT

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) has a high risk of recurrence and requires unique treatment relative to other skin cancers. The patient population is generally older, with comorbidities. Multidisciplinary and personalized care is therefore paramount, based on patient preferences regarding risks and benefits. Positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET-CT) is the most sensitive staging modality and reveals clinically occult disease in ~ 16% of patients. Discovery of occult disease spread markedly alters management. Newly diagnosed, localized disease is often managed with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), local excision, primary wound closure, and post-operative radiation therapy (PORT). In contrast, metastatic disease is usually treated systemically with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI). However, one or more of these approaches may not be indicated. Criteria for such exceptions and alternative approaches will be discussed. Because MCC recurs in 40% of patients and early detection/treatment of advanced disease is advantageous, close surveillance is recommended. Given that over 90% of initial recurrences arise within 3 years, surveillance frequency can be rapidly decreased after this high-risk period. Patient-specific assessment of risk is important because recurrence risk varies widely (15 to > 80%: Merkelcell.org/recur) depending on baseline patient characteristics and time since treatment. Blood-based surveillance tests are now available (Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) antibodies and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)) with excellent sensitivity that can spare patients from contrast dye, radioactivity, and travel to a cancer imaging facility. If recurrent disease is locoregional, management with surgery and/or RT is typically indicated. ICIs are now the first line for systemic/advanced MCC, with objective response rates (ORRs) exceeding 50%. Cytotoxic chemotherapy is sometimes used for debulking disease or in patients who cannot tolerate ICI. ICI-refractory disease is the major problem faced by this field. Fortunately, numerous promising therapies are on the horizon to address this clinical need.

Best practices in surgical and nonsurgical management of head and neck Merkel cell carcinoma: An update

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, highly aggressive cutaneous neuroendocrine carcinoma. Controversy exists regarding optimal management of MCC as high-quality randomized studies and clinical trials are limited, and physicians are bound to interpret highly heterogeneous, retrospective literature in their clinical practice. Furthermore, the rising incidence and notably poor prognosis of MCC urges the establishment of best practices for optimal management of the primary tumor and its metastases. Herein, we summarized the relevant evidence and provided an algorithm for decision-making in MCC management based on the latest 2021 National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Additionally, we report current active MCC clinical trials in the United States. The initial management of MCC is dependent upon the pathology of the primary tumor and presence of metastatic disease. Patients with no clinical evidence of regional lymph node involvement generally require sentinel node biopsy (SLNB) while clinically node-positive patients should undergo fine needle aspiration (FNA) or core biopsy and full imaging workup. If SLNB or FNA/core biopsy are positive, a multidisciplinary team should be assembled to discuss if additional node dissection or adjuvant therapy is necessary. Wide local excision is optimal for primary tumor management and SLNB remains the preferred staging and predictive tool in MCC. The management of MCC has progressively improved in the last decade, particularly due to the establishment of immunotherapy as a new treatment option in advanced MCC. Ongoing trials and prospective studies are needed to further establish the best practices for MCC management.

Diagnosis and treatment of Merkel cell carcinoma: European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline - Update 2022

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare skin cancer, accounting for less than 1% of all cutaneous malignancies. It is found predominantly in white populations and risk factors include advanced age, ultraviolet exposure, male sex, immunosuppression, such as AIDS/HIV infection, haematological malignancies or solid organ transplantation, and Merkel cell polyomavirus infection. MCC is an aggressive tumour with 26% of cases presenting lymph node involvement at diagnosis and 8% with distant metastases. Five-year overall survival rates range between 48% and 63%. Two subsets of MCC have been characterised with distinct molecular pathogenetic pathways: ultraviolet-induced MCC versus virus-positive MCC, which carries a better prognosis. In both subtypes, there are alterations in the retinoblastoma protein and p53 gene structure and function. MCC typically manifests as a red nodule or plaque with fast growth, most commonly on sun exposed areas. Histopathology (small-cell neuroendocrine appearance) and immunohistochemistry (CK20 positivity and TTF-1 negativity) confirm the diagnosis. The current staging systems are the American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for international Cancer control 8th edition. Baseline whole body imaging is encouraged to rule out regional and distant metastasis. For localised MCC, first-line treatment is surgical excision with postoperative margin assessment followed by adjuvant radiation therapy (RT). Sentinel lymph node biopsy is recommended in all patients with MCC without clinically detectable lymph nodes or distant metastasis. Adjuvant RT alone, eventually combined with complete lymph nodes dissection is proposed in case of micrometastatic nodal involvement. In case of macroscopic nodal involvement, the standard of care is complete lymph nodes dissection potentially followed by post-operative RT. Immunotherapy with anti-PD-(L)1 antibodies should be offered as first-line systemic treatment in advanced MCC. Chemotherapy can be used when patients fail to respond or are intolerant for anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapy or clinical trials.

Patterns and predictors of relapse in Merkel cell carcinoma: Results from a population-based study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Prospective data evaluating the role of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) for Merkel Cell Carcinoma(MCC) is lacking. To better understand the efficacy of adjuvant RT, a population-based patterns of failure study was conducted.

METHODS

We identified MCC patients treated from 1988 to 2018.Primary outcome measures were recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS) and MCC-specific survival (MCC-SS). Charlson Co-morbidity Index (CCI) was also calculated.

RESULTS

217 patients with mean age 79 (range: 33-96) were analyzed. The median follow-up was 40 months. Treatments were: surgery(S) alone (n = 101, 45%) or S + RT(n = 116, 55%).Local recurrence (LR) was low in stage I (n = 6, 6.5%) with clear margin of ≥1 cm, negative sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) without high-risk factors, irrespective of adjuvant RT. Tumor size ≥ 2 cm (HR:2.95; p = 0.024) and immunosuppression(HR:3.98; p = 0.001) were associated with high risk of nodal failure. Adjuvant RT was associated with significant reduction in regional failure (HR:0.36; p = 0.002). Distant metastases (DM) were infrequent in stage I (4/90) and stage II (4/34), compared to stage III (32/93). Adjuvant RT improvedRFS but did not influence MCC-SS and OS. CCI was a significant predictor of OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant RT improvedRFS, withoutimpact on MCC-SS and OS. Co-morbidity rather than RT influenced OS. Adjuvant RT may be avoided instage I patients with negative SLNB and no associated high-risk factors. Prophylactic RNI could be considered in stage II with high risk features, inspite of negative SLNB. Stage III patients benefited from adjuvant RNI, but no impact on prevention of DM.

The Association of Radiation Therapy and Chemotherapy on Overall Survival in Merkel Cell Carcinoma: A Population-Based Analysis

Purpose/objective(s) Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive cutaneous neoplasm traditionally managed with surgical resection followed by radiotherapy (RT). With the recent approval of checkpoint inhibitors, chemotherapy is less commonly utilized. We analyzed the impact of RT and chemotherapy on overall survival (OS) in patients with MCC using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER), a population-level database. Materials and methods We performed retrospective analyses on SEER 18 Custom Data registries for MCC (ICD-0-3 8247). Data from 1980 to 2016 was queried for analysis, and an initial list of 9,792 patients was populated (ICD: C00, C07.9, C44, C80.9). Selection for cases with chemotherapy and RT status, single primary tumor, primary tumor location and surgery treatment type yielded 5,002 cases for analysis. Baseline characteristics were compared with Chi-square or Mann-Whitney U test. Univariate and multivariable analysis using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression modeling were performed. Propensity-score matched analysis with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to account for indication bias. Results Median follow-up time was 178 months (68 to 217 months). Independent prognostic factors positively correlated with increased OS, for both unadjusted Multivariate analysis and IPTW adjusted MVA were age, male sex, year of diagnosis, stage, RT status, and chemotherapy status. On adjusted MVA, use of chemotherapy was associated with worse OS (hazard ratio: 1.22 [95% CI 1.1-1.35], p<0.001), whereas RT was associated with improved OS (HR:0.9 [95% CI, 0.83-0.97], p=0.008). Conclusions The current study demonstrates that RT is associated with improved survival for patients with MCC. Chemotherapy was associated with worse OS. This supports the recent clinical shift towards immune checkpoints inhibitors as standard of care in the metastatic setting, and promising trials in the adjuvant and advanced settings.

The changing paradigm of managing Merkel cell carcinoma in Australia: An expert commentary

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a highly aggressive neuroendocrine tumor of the skin with an estimated disease-associated mortality of 15-33%. Australia has a higher incidence of MCC compared to the rest of the world, thought to be due to a higher ultraviolet index. The Australian MCC population is distinct from the MCC population of the Northern hemisphere, characterized by a predominantly viral negative etiology with high tumor mutational burden. The optimal management of MCC and the choice of treatment modality vary significantly across the world and even between institutions within Australia. Historically, the treatment for MCC has been resection followed by radiotherapy (RT), though definitive RT is an alternative treatment used commonly in Australia. The arrival of immune checkpoint inhibitors and the mounting evidence that MCC is a highly immunogenic disease is transforming the treatment landscape for MCC. Australia is playing a key role in the further development of treatment options for MCC with two upcoming Australian/New Zealand investigator-initiated clinical trials that will explore the interplay of RT and immunotherapy in the treatment of early and late stage MCC.

Real-world outcomes among US Merkel cell carcinoma patients initiating immune checkpoint inhibitors or chemotherapy

Aim: Retrospectively assessed treatment patterns and clinical and economic outcomes in Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) patients receiving recommended first-line regimens. Materials & methods: MCC patients newly treated with either immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) or chemotherapies (CTs) were selected from the Veterans Health Administration database (2013-2018); 74 patients (ICIs: 20 and CTs: 54) were selected. Results: Median duration of therapy was 300 days for ICIs and 91 days for CTs. Time to next treatment was 245 and 184 days, respectively. Mean total (per patient per month) costs were $15,306 (ICIs) and $10,957 (CTs), of which 51% and 86%, respectively, were non-MCC therapy-related costs. Conclusion: Despite higher costs, utilization of ICIs in first-line MCC shows clinical advantages over CTs in the real world.

Merkel Cell Carcinoma - Current Controversies and Future Directions

Merkel cell carcinoma is a rare, aggressive neuroendocrine skin malignancy. Evidence for management comes from case series and single-arm trials. Optimal outcomes require assessment of the patient in a multidisciplinary team setting. Rapid diagnosis and staging are essential for locoregional control and may reduce metastasis. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) adds prognostic information. FDG-positron emission tomography has high sensitivity and specificity and affects management in a quarter of cases. Surgical excision and radiotherapy provide good locoregional control even with positive margins. Wide surgical margins are needed if adjuvant radiotherapy is not used. It is uncertain whether adjuvant radiotherapy or elective surgery for uninvolved nodes or for patients selected by positive SLNB improves survival. Total doses of 50 Gy provide high levels of control for microscopic disease but at least 60 Gy should be given for macroscopic disease. Chemotherapy can be given safely with radiotherapy, but the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy remains uncertain. Trials of adjuvant immune therapy are underway. Unresectable primaries might be controlled with radiotherapy alone or combination systemic therapy, radiotherapy and surgery. Metastatic disease often responds to chemotherapy, but the response duration can be short. Immunity is central to disease control. Immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment resulted in high response rates in chemotherapy-naive patients and lower rates in chemotherapy-refractory patients. Durable responses are observed.

Merkel Cell Carcinoma Treatment in Finland in 1986-2016-A Real-World Data Study

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare cutaneous carcinoma that has gained enormous interest since the discovery of Merkel cell polyoma virus, which is a causative oncogenic agent in the majority of MCC tumours. Increased research has focused on effective treatment options with immuno-oncology. In this study, we reviewed the real-world data on different treatments given to MCC patients in Finland in 1986-2016. We used the Finnish Cancer Registry database to find MCC patients and the Hospital Discharge Register and the Cause-of-Death Register to obtain treatment data. We identified 376 MCC patients and 33 different treatment entities and/or combinations of treatment. An increase was noted in the incidence of MCC since 2005. Therefore, the cohort was divided into two groups: the "early" group with time of diagnosis between years 1986 and 2004 and the "late" group with time of diagnosis between 2005 and 2016. The multitude of different treatment combinations is a relatively new phenomenon; before the year 2005, only 11 treatments or treatment combinations were used for MCC patients. Our data show that combining radiation therapy with simple excision provided a survival advantage, which was, however, lost after adjustment for stage or age. Our registry study serves as a baseline treatment efficacy comparison as we move into the age of immunotherapy in MCC. Standardizing the treatment of MCC patients in Finland requires more work on awareness and multidisciplinary co-operation.

Patterns of Metastasis in Merkel Cell Carcinoma

Background

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a cutaneous neuroendocrine malignancy with a propensity for regional and distant spread. Because of the relative infrequency of this disease, the patterns of metastasis in MCC are understudied.

Methods

Patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (8th edition) stage I–IV MCC treated at our institution were identified (1/1/2008–2/28/2018). The first site of metastasis was classified as regional [regional lymph node (LN) basin, in-transit] or distant. Distant metastasis-free (DMFS) and MCC-specific (MSS) survival were estimated.

Results

Of 133 patients, 64 (48%) had stage I, 13 (10%) stage II, 48 (36%) stage III, and 8 (6%) stage IV disease at presentation. The median follow-up time in patients who remained alive was 36 (interquartile range 20–66) months. Regional or distant metastases developed in 78 (59%) patients. The first site was regional in 87%, including 73% with isolated LN involvement, and distant in 13%. Thirty-seven (28%) patients eventually developed distant disease, which most commonly involved the abdominal viscera (51%) and distant LNs (46%) first. The lung (0%) and brain (3%) were rarely the first distant sites. Stage III MCC at presentation was significantly associated with worse DMFS (hazard ratio 4.87, P = 0.001) and stage IV disease with worse MSS (hazard ratio 6.30, P = 0.002).

Conclusions

Regional LN metastasis is the most common first metastatic event in MCC, confirming the importance of nodal evaluation. Distant disease spread appears to have a predilection for certain sites. Understanding these patterns could help to guide surveillance strategies.

The association between facility volume and overall survival in patients with Merkel cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Merkel cell carcinoma is an uncommon malignancy often requiring multidisciplinary management. The purpose of this study was to determine whether high-volume facilities have improved outcomes in patients with Merkel cell carcinoma relative to lower-volume facilities.

METHODS

A total of 5304 patients from the National Cancer Database with stage I-III Merkel cell carcinoma undergoing surgery were analyzed. High-volume facilities were the top 1% by case volume. Multivariable Cox regression and propensity score-matching were performed to account for imbalances between groups.

RESULTS

Treatment at high-volume facilities (hazard ratio: 0.74; 95% confidence interval: 0.65-0.84, P < .001) was independently associated with improved overall survival (OS) in multivariable analyses. In propensity score-matched cohorts, 5-year OS was 62.3% at high-volume facilities vs 56.8% at lower-volume facilities (P < .001). Median OS was 111 months at high-volume facilities vs 79 months at lower-volume facilities.

CONCLUSION

Treatment at high-volume facilities is associated with improved OS in Merkel cell carcinoma. Given the impracticality of referring all elderly patients with Merkel cell carcinoma to a small number of facilities, methods to mitigate this disparity should be explored.

S2k guidelines for Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC, neuroendocrine carcinoma of the skin) - update 2018

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC, ICD-O M8247 / 3) is a rare malignant primary skin tumor with epithelial and neuroendocrine differentiation. The neoplastic cells share many morphological, immunohistochemical and ultrastructural characteristics with Merkel cells of the skin. The diagnosis of MCC is rarely made on clinical grounds. Histological and immunohistochemical studies are usually required to confirm the clinical suspicion. Given the frequent occurrence of occult lymph node metastasis, sentinel lymph node biopsy should be performed once distant metastasis has been ruled out by cross-sectional imaging. Primary tumors without evidence of organ metastases are treated with complete surgical excision with appropriate surgical margins. Radiation therapy should be considered at all stages of the disease. For advanced MCC that is no longer amenable to curative treatment by surgery or radiation therapy, there is currently no established systemic therapy for which an improvement in recurrence-free survival or overall survival has been demonstrated in a prospective randomized trial. However, immunotherapy using PD-1/PD-L1 blockade seems to be superior to chemotherapy. Various factors warrant that further diagnostic and therapeutic interventions be determined by an interdisciplinary tumor board. These factors include the tumor's aggressiveness, the frequent indication for sentinel lymph node biopsy along with the frequent occurrence in the head and neck region, the potential indication for adjuvant radiation therapy as well as the complexity of the required diagnostic workup.

Adjuvant radiotherapy for Merkel cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive cutaneous malignancy with a high propensity for local recurrence and regional and distant metastases. The main treatment is surgery with narrow excision margins and draining nodes, plus or minus adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) on the surgical bed and/or lymph nodes. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the benefits of adjuvant RT in MCC treatment. PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched to identify relevant studies published before September 2018. Prospective trials and retrospective series comparing adjuvant RT vs. no RT in resected primary MCCs were included. Primary endpoint was to evaluate the outcomes of MCC patients who received adjuvant RT in term of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Hazard ratios (HRs) for OS and DFS were aggregated according to a fixed or random effect model. Secondary endpoints were local, locoregional, and distant DFS. A total of 17,179 MCCs across 29 studies were analysed. There was a significant difference in OS between the RT and no RT arms (HR = 0.81, 95%CI 0.75-0.86, P < 0.001). There was also a significant difference in DFS in favour of adjuvant RT (HR = 0.45, 95%CI 0.32-0.62, P < 0.001). Adjuvant RT improved locoregional DFS and local DFS but not distant DFS (HR = 0.3, 95%CI 0.22-0.42; HR = 0.21, 95%CI 0.14-0.33, and HR = 0.79, 95%CI 0.49-1.14, respectively). Meta-regression analysis showed that high Newcastle-Ottawa scale scores, stage I-II MCCs, shorter follow-up durations, size >2 cm, and being of a younger age were associated with increased OS. This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests a survival and DFS benefit for postoperative radiation of MCCs. Intermediate stage MCCs derive the maximum benefit with local and regional relapses reduced by 80% and 70%, respectively. Conversely, distant metastases were not significantly prevented.

Treatment patterns, comorbidities, healthcare resource use, and associated costs by line of chemotherapy and level of comorbidity in patients with newly-diagnosed Merkel cell carcinoma in the United States

AIMS

To examine the characteristics of patients with newly-diagnosed Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), analyze their treatment patterns and comorbidities after diagnosis, and evaluate the economic burden on the MCC patient population in the US.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This observational, non-interventional cohort study identified patients with MCC that were newly-diagnosed between January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2014, and whose data were either in the MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters (CCAE) or Medicare Supplemental and Coordination of Benefits databases. Standard descriptive statistics were used to describe patient demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment regimens, and healthcare resource use (HRU) and cost.

RESULTS

Following MCC diagnosis, most patients in the study population (n = 2,177) received only surgery (34.5%) or surgery and radiotherapy without chemotherapy (22.0%), while 14.5% of patients received none of these treatments; 27.5% of patients received at least one line of chemotherapy as part of their treatment. Mean total healthcare costs per patient per year (PPPY), as well as mean inpatient, outpatient, and pharmacy costs, were significantly greater for patients who received chemotherapy compared with those who received other or no treatments. Higher HRU and mean costs were associated with increasing patient comorbidity burden, ranging from $62,401 PPPY in Deyo Charlson Comorbidity Index level 1 to $109,690 in level ≥3.

LIMITATIONS

The study used claims databases that were limited to patients who are covered by large employer-sponsored insurance and/or Medicare and did not provide information regarding the rationale for treatment choice or resource use.

CONCLUSIONS

The choice of treatment is a major factor in determining healthcare costs associated with MCC, with the highest costs in patients receiving chemotherapy. Patients with MCC often exhibit comorbidities, and both HRU and healthcare costs increase significantly with each comorbidity level.

Management of Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in Merkel Cell Carcinoma: Completion Lymphadenectomy, Radiation, or Both?

BACKGROUND

Approximately 30% of patients with clinically localized Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) show nodal involvement on sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). Optimal management of SLNB-positive disease has not been defined. This study compared outcomes after completion lymphadenectomy (CLND), radiation, and combined CLND plus radiation after a positive SLNB.

METHODS

All patients treated at a single institution for SLNB-positive MCC (1998-2015) were retrospectively evaluated, with examination of patient demographics, clinicopathologic characteristics, outcomes, and regional toxicity.

RESULTS

The study identified 71 evaluable patients with SLNB-positive disease. The median age of these patients was 76 years, and 76.1% were men. Of the 71 patients, 11 (15.5%) underwent CLND, 40 (56.3%) received radiation, and 20 (28.2%) underwent CLND plus postoperative radiation. Lymphovascular invasion was significantly more common in the radiation-alone cohort (p = 0.04). For the three cohorts, the median percentages of nodal involvement were respectively 2, 10, and 30% (p = 0.06). After a median follow-up period of 22.3 months, four patients had recurrence in their regional nodal basin (3 radiation-alone patients and 1 CLND + radiation patient). The three cohorts did not differ significantly in the development of distant metastases (p = 0.68) or overall survival (p = 0.72). Six patients experienced surgical-site infections (2 CLND and 4 CLND + radiation patients), and three patients experienced symptomatic lymphedema (1 CLND patient and 2 CLND + radiation patients).

CONCLUSIONS

Regional failure was infrequent (≤ 10%) regardless of treatment, and morbidity appeared to be low with all approaches. Given that multiple treatment approaches can be successful in treating micrometastatic MCC, future efforts should be directed at refining criteria for allocating patients to a specific method, or possibly no further nodal basin treatment, in an effort to maximize regional control at the lowest cost and morbidity.

Resection Margins in Merkel Cell Carcinoma: Is a 1-cm Margin Wide Enough?

BACKGROUND

Guidelines regarding specific resection margins for primary Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) are not well established. The current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend 1- to 2-cm resection margins. This study aimed to determine the impact of margin width on local recurrence (LR), disease-specific survival (DSS), overall survival (OS), and type of wound closure.

METHODS

All patients who underwent resection of primary MCC at a single institution from 2000 to 2015 were reviewed. Patient demographics, clinicopathologic characteristics, treatments, and outcomes were reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 240 patients underwent resection of primary MCC with resection margin width identified in the operative report. The median age was 76 years, and 65.8% of the patients were men. Of the 240 patients, 85 (35.4%) had head and neck primaries, 140 (58.3%) had extremity primaries, and 15 (6.3%) had trunk primaries. In terms of margins, 69 patients (28.8%) had a margin of 1 cm, 36 patients (15%) had a margin of 1.1-1.9 cm, and 135 patients (56.2%) had a margin of 2 cm or more. The median follow-up period was 21 months. The LR rate was 2.9% for a margin of 1 cm, 2.8% for a margin of 1.1-1.9 cm, and 5.2% for a margin of 2 cm or more (p = 0.80). The 5-year OS was 63.6% for a margin of 1 cm, 59.7% for a margin of 1.1-1.9, and 70.7% for a margin of 2 cm or more (p = 0.66). The 5-year DSS was 80.3% for a margin of 1 cm, 66.2% for a margin of 1.1-1.9 cm, and 91.8% for a margin of 2 cm or more (p = 0.28). For wound closure, 43.5, 50, and 65.9% of the patients respectively required a flap or graft with a margin of 1, 1.1-1.9, and 2 cm or more (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

A 1-cm resection margins did not increase the risk of LR. Margin width did not make a significant difference in DSS or OS. Larger resection margins increase the need for a graft or flap closure.

Effect of Patient Immune Status on the Efficacy of Radiation Therapy and Recurrence-Free Survival Among 805 Patients With Merkel Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE

Patients with Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) with chronic immunosuppression (IS) have worse outcomes, but the mechanisms are not well understood. We hypothesized that these differences may be mediated in part by differential response to treatment, and we evaluated whether radiation therapy (RT) efficacy is altered among IS compared with immune-competent (IC) patients with MCC.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Among 805 patients with MCC, recurrence-free survival (RFS) and patterns of first recurrence were compared between 89 IS and 716 IC patients with stage I to III MCC treated with curative intent. We used a Fine and Gray's competing risk multivariable analysis to estimate associations with RFS.

RESULTS

IS and IC patients with MCC had similar demographic and disease characteristics. Most (77% IC, 86% IS) were irradiated (median, 50.4 Gy IC, 50.3 Gy IS), although more IS patients were irradiated to the primary site (97% vs 81%). With a median follow-up of 54.4 months, IS patients had inferior RFS (2-year: 30% vs 57%; P < .0001) and higher rates of local recurrence as the first site of relapse (25% vs 12%; P = .0002). The association between RT and RFS differed by immune status (interaction P = .01). Although RT was associated with significantly improved RFS among IC patients (hazard ratio 0.56, 95% confidence interval 0.44-0.72), no difference in RFS was observed with RT among IS patients (hazard ratio 1.49, 95% confidence interval 0.70-3.17).

CONCLUSIONS

Radiation therapy efficacy at current standard RT doses for MCC is impaired among immunosuppressed patients with MCC. Although a strong link between durability of RT response and immune function does not appear to be evident in most cancers, our results may reflect an especially dynamic interaction between immune status and RT efficacy in MCC.

Planning study for Merkel cell carcinoma based on the relapse pattern

PURPOSE

To develop a technique for radiation (RT) of in-transit path ways (IT) in Merkel cell carcinoma.

METHOD

In the planning study, IT were ink-marked on the skin during sentinel lymphscintigraphy and wire-marked in planning-CT. Pre- and post-operative planning-CTs were acquired. The clinical target volume (CTV) included tumor bed plus safety margin, IT and draining nodes, the planning volume (PTV) the CTV plus 0.5-1cm margin. VMAT plans with 2-3 arcs were analyzed.

RESULTS

A planning study was performed for five pts. including two pts. with primary tumor (PT) in head and neck, 1 pt. each with PT of elbow, forearm and upper leg respectively. Plans showed satisfactory PTV coverage: D_mean 100%±0%, D_98% 92.4%±2.24%, homogeneity index (HI) 0.095±0.01, conformation number (CN) 0.84±0.01 and conformality index (CI) 0.95±0.01.

CONCLUSION

The planning study confirms feasibility of highly conformal irradiation of IT pathways based on individualized target delineation. Currently, patients referred for non-metastatic MCC are encouraged to enroll in a prospective clinical study that evaluates the feasibility of radiation of IT pathways.

[Care of Merkel cell carcinoma and role of the radiotherapy]

Merkel cell carcinoma is a rare neuro-endocrine tumor of skin with a poor prognosis. Data available in literature are scarce. Current treatment for locoregional disease is based on combined treatment by surgery and radiotherapy. However these treatments are controversial. The aim of the present review is to sum up the different available studies and to compare national and international guidelines.

Radiation Therapy is Associated with Improved Outcomes in Merkel Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Following wide excision of Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), postoperative radiation therapy (RT) is typically recommended. Controversy remains as to whether RT can be avoided in selected cases, such as those with negative margins. Additionally, there is evidence that RT can influence survival.

METHODS

We included 171 patients treated for non-metastatic MCC from 1994 through 2012 at a single institution. Patients without pathologic nodal evaluation (clinical N0 disease) were excluded to reflect modern treatment practice. The endpoints included local control (LC), locoregional control (LRC), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and disease-specific survival (DSS).

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 33 months. Treatment with RT was associated with improved 3-year LC (91.2 vs. 76.9 %, respectively; p = 0.01), LRC (79.5 vs. 59.1 %; p = 0.004), DFS (57.0 vs. 30.2 %; p < 0.001), and OS (73 vs. 66 %; p = 0.02), and was associated with improved 3-year DSS among node-positive patients (76.2 vs. 48.1 %; p = 0.035), but not node-negative patients (90.1 vs. 80.8 %; p = 0.79). On multivariate analysis, RT was associated with improved LC [hazard ratio (HR) 0.18, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.07-0.46; p < 0.001], LRC (HR 0.28, 95 % CI 0.14-0.56; p < 0.001), DFS (HR 0.42, 95 % CI 0.26-0.70; p = 0.001), OS (HR 0.53, 95 % CI 0.31-0.93; p = 0.03), and DSS (HR 0.42, 95 % CI 0.26-0.70; p = 0.001). Patients with negative margins had significant improvements in 3-year LC (90.1 vs. 75.4 %; p < 0.001) with RT. Deaths not attributable to MCC were relatively evenly distributed between the RT and no RT groups (28.5 and 29.3 % of patients, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

RT for MCC was associated with improved LRC and survival. RT appeared to be beneficial regardless of margin status.

Evaluation of Polo-like kinase 1 as a potential therapeutic target in Merkel cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive malignancy of the skin. Treatment options for MCC include surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. The purpose of this study was to assess the expression of Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) in MCC and the role of the inhibitor, BI2536, as a potential therapeutic option in MCC.

METHODS

PLK1 expression was assessed in tissue samples from 28 patients with MCC and 5 healthy skin samples via immunohistochemistry and furthermore in the 2 MCC cell lines, MCC13 and MCC26, via immunoblotting. The impact of increasing doses of BI2536 alone and in combination with cisplatin or irradiation on cell viability was measured using the CCK-8 assay. Colony forming assays were performed to evaluate long-term effects of combination treatments. Additionally, the induction of apoptotic cell death was measured via flow cytometry.

RESULTS

PLK1 is moderately to strongly expressed in 75% of the patients with MCC. The PLK1 inhibitor, BI2536, demonstrated marked inhibition of cell proliferation with IC50 in the low nM range (from 10.07-12.39 nM). Furthermore, BI2536 induces apoptosis in MCC cell lines and acts synergistically in combination with irradiation and cisplatin.

CONCLUSION

Because of the marked upregulation of PLK1 in MCC tumor samples and potent inhibition of cell proliferation using a specific clinically available inhibitor, targeting of PLK1 qualifies as a potential novel therapeutic strategy in MCC. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: E1918-E1925, 2016.

Merkel cell carcinoma of the head and neck: challenges in implementing best practice

OBJECTIVE

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive skin tumor. Controversies regarding optimal management persist due to inadequate data and knowledge regarding tumor biology. Head and neck MCC increases both oncological and reconstructive challenges, compounded by predominantly elderly patients. We review our practice and outcomes, review evidence, and discuss the difficulties in delivering best practice management.

METHODS

All patients with primary head and neck MCC, managed by a single multidisciplinary team between January 2001 and December 2010, were identified through retrospective analysis of a pathology coding database. A literature review was performed.

RESULTS

Twenty patients, with a mean age of 83.5 years (40-99 years) and presenting with mean symptom duration of 5 months, had primary tumors involving the nose (n = 2), periorbital region (n = 5), cheek (n = 6), and the temple and scalp (n = 7). Mean tumor size was 2.1 cm (range, 0.5-7.5 cm). Reconstructive techniques were direct closure (n = 8), skin grafting (n = 7), local flaps (n = 4), and free anterolateral thigh flap (n = 1). Two (10%) patients presented with nodal disease. Eight (40%) patients re-presented with nodal recurrence at a mean of 7 months with 6 undergoing salvage neck dissections. Adjuvant radiotherapy was completed in 5 cases, and chemotherapy used for palliation in 1 case. Most of the patients declined radiotherapy due to adverse effects or frailty.

CONCLUSIONS

Our series demonstrates the profound challenges in managing head and neck MCC, including tailoring definitive primary treatment and current consensus management to elderly patients. Regional nodal assessment and management remains crucial to achieving this goal.

Radiotherapy and Conservative Surgery in the Locoregional Management of Merkel Cell Carcinoma: The British Columbia Cancer Agency Experience

BACKGROUND

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an uncommon aggressive skin malignancy. Published series mainly focus on wide excision, which can be difficult at some sites (e.g., face) and in patients with comorbidities. In British Columbia, an approach of conservative surgery followed by radiotherapy is common.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective review of 179 patients treated for MCC with curative intent in British Columbia.

RESULTS

Totals of 68, 63, and 37 patients underwent narrow excision of primary, attempted wide excision, and biopsy only, respectively. Adjuvant radiotherapy reduced local recurrence after narrow excision (<10 mm margin) from 25 to 4.9 % (p = .03) and was effective in the presence of microscopic positive margins. Local recurrence rate was 7.1 % if the margin was >10 mm irrespective of radiation use. Local RFS was improved by adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) (p = 0.04), and there was a trend to reduced nodal relapse after elective nodal RT (p = .07). Irradiation of macroscopic tumor at 37 primary and 33 nodal sites provided 5-year local and nodal RFS of 90 and 75 %, respectively. The 5-year cancer specific survival was 77 % and was not improved by the use of adjuvant radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Local excision plus adjuvant RT is an effective treatment for MCC. Adjuvant radiation should be considered when the excision margin is <1 cm.

A case series and literature review of Merkel cell carcinoma metastasizing to pancreas

BACKGROUND

Merkel cell carcinoma is a rare aggressive tumor arising from the mechanoreceptors of the epidermis with a relative higher mortality rate stage for stage than melanoma. Microscopically, the cells appear similar to small cell lung cancer, but they specifically stain positive for CK20 and are negative for TTF-1. It is rarely known to metastasize to the pancreas.

AIMS

To report four cases of Merkel cell carcinoma metastasizing to pancreas and compare them to previously reported patients.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of all patients who underwent endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for a suspected pancreatic lesion between January 2004 and December 2012. We reviewed other reported cases with a literature search using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus.

RESULTS

Four male patients with mean age of 66 years were found to have metastatic disease in the pancreas on average 29 months after initial diagnosis of MCC. Two cases were diagnosed with EUS-FNA and two with PET-CT. Three patients had multifocal pancreatic involvement which has not been previously described. All four patients died within 3-9 months following tumor spread to the pancreas. Merkel cell carcinoma rarely metastasizes to the pancreas with only 10 cases being described in the medical literature.

CONCLUSIONS

EUS-FNA is an effective tool that can be utilized in diagnosing pancreatic masses. Differentiating metastatic pancreatic tumors, especially Merkel cell carcinoma from primary pancreatic tumor is useful as systemic therapy is an option in pancreatic adenocarcinoma, but is ineffective in metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma.

Regional nodal relapse in surgically staged Merkel cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

The nodal relapse pattern of surgically staged Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) with/without elective nodal radiotherapy (RT) was studied in a single institution.

METHOD

A total of 51 patients with MCC, 33% UICC stage I, 14% II, 53% III (4 lymph node metastases of unknown primary) were eligible. All patients had surgical staging: 23 patients sentinel node biopsy (SNB), 22 patients SNB followed by lymphadenectomy (LAD) and 6 patients LAD. In all, 94% of the primary tumors (PT) were completely resected; 57% of patients received RT, 51% of known PT sites, 33% (8/24 patients) regional RT to snN0 nodes and 68% (17/27 patients) to pN+ nodes, mean reference dose 51.5 and 50 Gy, respectively. Mean follow-up was 6 years (range 2-14 years).

RESULTS

A total of 22% (11/51) patients developed regional relapses (RR); the 5-year RR rate was 27%. In snN0 sites (stage I/II), relapse occurred in 5 of 14 nonirradiated vs. none of 8 irradiated sites (p = 0.054), resulting in a 5-year RR rate of 33% versus 0% (p = 0.16). The crude RR rate was lower in stage I (12%, 2/17 patients) than for stage II (43%, 3/7 patients). In stage III (pN+), RR appeared to be less frequent in irradiated sites (18%, 3/14 patients) compared with nonirradiated sites (33%, 3/10 patients, p = 0.45) with 5-year RR rates of 23% vs. 34%, respectively.

DISCUSSION

Our data suggest that adjuvant nodal RT plays a major role even if the sentinel nodes were negative.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant RT of the lymph nodes in patients with stage IIa tumors and RT after LAD in stage III tumors is proposed and should be evaluated prospectively.

Effect of host, tumor, diagnostic, and treatment variables on outcomes in a large cohort with Merkel cell carcinoma

IMPORTANCE

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive, neuroendocrine-derived skin cancer with high rates of recurrence and associated mortality. Few published studies have used comprehensive patient data and long-term follow-up to examine factors that predict MCC outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize MCC in a large defined-population cohort and analyze predictors of disease recurrence and survival.

SETTING, DESIGN, AND PARTICIPANTS

Retrospective cohort study of 218 patients with MCC from the cancer registry of Kaiser Permanente Northern California, a large integrated health care delivery system. Patients were diagnosed as having MCC and followed up from January 1, 1995, through December 31, 2009. We examined host (age, sex, race, and immunosuppression), tumor (anatomic site, size, and extent), diagnostic (results of imaging and pathologic nodal evaluation), and treatment (surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy) variables for their association with MCC outcomes.

EXPOSURE

Host, tumor, diagnostic, and treatment factors.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Recurrence (locoregional and distant) of MCC and patient survival (overall and MCC specific).

RESULTS

We estimated adjusted hazard ratios (AHRs) and 95% CIs for outcomes using Cox proportional hazards regression models. After adjustment for host, tumor, diagnostic, and treatment variables, tumor extent (categorized as local, regional, and distant) remained significantly associated with all outcomes. Immunosuppression was associated with higher MCC-specific mortality (AHR, 4.9 [95% CI, 1.7-14.4]), and an unknown primary site was associated with a lower risk for distant metastasis (0.1 [0.0-0.7]) and improved survival (0.4 [0.2-0.9]). Pathological nodal evaluation was associated with a lower risk for metastasis (AHR, 0.2 [95% CI, 0.0-1.0]) and improved survival. Radiation treatment was associated with a decreased risk for locoregional recurrence (AHR, 0.3 [95% CI, 0.1-0.6]), whereas chemotherapy was not associated with any alteration in outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Tumor site and extent, results of pathologic nodal evaluation, and the presence of radiation treatment were associated with MCC recurrence. Immunosuppression, tumor extent, and results of pathologic nodal evaluation were associated with MCC-specific survival, whereas chemotherapy was not associated with any outcomes. Our findings may help to inform diagnostic and therapeutic management of MCCs.

Management of early stage cutaneous Merkel cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare but aggressive skin cancer of neuroendocrine origin. As a result, few large studies have been published, and we know of even fewer on disease of the head and neck alone. The most appropriate way to manage patients with early local disease and no sign of metastases neck is controversial. We reviewed management of early cutaneous MCC of the head and neck in 8 hospitals in the United Kingdom over 12 years between 1999 and 2011 (the largest head and neck series in Europe to date), and identified 39 patients (19 men and 20 women) with early disease according to a well recognised classification. A total of 24 patients had stage Ia disease, 11 had stage Ib disease, and 4 were unclassified. Five of those with stage Ia disease developed regional metastases and 7 with stage Ib disease developed regional recurrence. The 2-year overall survival for stage Ia and Ib disease was 62% and 27%, respectively. Our study shows that prognosis is poor after conservative surgical management of stage I disease. Management of the neck is still controversial, and a meta-analysis of all the published data is needed to establish best practice statistically.

History of the rare cancer network and past research

Approximately, twenty years ago, the Rare Cancer Network (RCN) was formed in Lausanne, Switzerland, to support the study of rare malignancies. The RCN has grown over the years and now includes 130 investigators from twenty-four nations on six continents. The network held its first international symposium in Nice, France, on March 21-22, 2014. The proceedings of that meeting are presented in two companion papers. This manuscript reviews the history of the growth of the RCN and contains the abstracts of fourteen oral presentations made at the meeting of prior RCN studies. From 1993 to 2014, 74 RCN studies have been initiated, of which 54 were completed, 10 are in progress or under analysis, and 9 were stopped due to poor accrual. Forty-four peer reviewed publications have been written on behalf of the RCN.

Outcomes of Merkel cell carcinoma treated with radiotherapy without radical surgical excision

BACKGROUND

Achieving clear surgical margins in Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) can be difficult due to tumor location or patient comorbidity. Clinical impression suggests that radiation treatment achieves good control of macroscopic disease.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was undertaken of all patients with pathological evidence of MCC and treated with curative intent at the BC Cancer Agency between 1979 and 2007. This is a report on the outcomes of those with gross disease treated with radiotherapy, without radical surgery.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients received definitive radiotherapy to the primary and/or nodal disease. Median age was 75 years and median follow-up was 34 months (84.5 months for those alive at last follow-up). American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage distribution was 23, 19, and 58 % for stages I, II, and III, respectively. Tumor control at sites treated for macroscopic disease was 88 % at 12 months and 82 % at 2 years, and 5-year local relapse-free survival (RFS) was 90 %. Five-year RFS, cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival were 57, 68, and 39 %, respectively. On univariate and multivariate analyses, only male sex was associated with a worse RFS, and a radiotherapy dose >50 Gy was associated with a better CSS.

LIMITATIONS

The retrospective nature of the study and small sample size limit the strength of the conclusions.

CONCLUSIONS

Radical radiotherapy is effective in the curative treatment of MCC, especially in patients who would tolerate wide surgical excision poorly, or where it would cause significant cosmetic or functional deficits.

The role of postoperative radiation and chemoradiation in merkel cell carcinoma: a systematic review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

A systematic review of the literature was undertaken to investigate whether adjuvant radiotherapy and/or chemotherapeutics offered any additional benefit than surgery alone in the treatment of Merkel Cell Carcinoma (MCC).

METHODS

A PubMed, MEDLINE search was conducted between 1995 and 2013, to identify reported cases of surgically treated MCC followed by either observation, radiation, or chemoradiation. Patient demographics and outcomes were recorded and compared in a systematic fashion.

RESULTS

Thirty-four studies (n = 4475) were included. The median age was 73 years, median follow up was 36 months and there was a 1.5:1 ratio of men to women. All 4475 patients had surgery, 1975 had no further treatment, 1689 received postoperative RT, and 301 received postoperative chemoRT. The most common site was face/head/neck, 47.8%. Stage 1 was the most common clinical stage at diagnosis (57%). Three-year local control was 20% (median 10%) in the observation cohort, compared to 65% (62%) with postoperative RT, and 67% (75%) with postoperative chemoRT; these findings were statistically significant (P < 0.001). Recurrence was found to be 38% (60%) in the observation cohort, compared to 23% (20%) with postoperative RT (P < 0.001). Three-year overall survival (OS) was found to be 56% (57%) in the observation cohort, compared to 70% (78%) with postoperative RT and 73% (76%) with postoperative chemoRT (P < 0.001). The observation cohort had a median OS of 44 months compared with 64 months (P < 0.001) in the postoperative RT cohort. There was no statistically significant difference in any parameters assessed between postoperative radiation and postoperative chemoradiation arms.

CONCLUSION

The comprehensive collection of retrospective data suggests a survival and control benefit for postoperative radiation in MCC. No differences were noted between adjuvant radiation and chemoradiation. This analysis indicates the need for prospective trials with patients stratified by known prognostic factors.

Merkel cell carcinoma of the retroperitoneum with no identifiable primary site

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an extremely rare primary neuroendocrine neoplasm of the skin that shows aggressive behavior and a poor prognosis. We report a case of a 67-year-old male with a Merkel cell carcinoma which initially presented itself as a large retroperitoneal mass. Pathological and immunohistochemical analysis revealed tissue consistent with neuroendocrine carcinoma. Despite complete medical workup, no other primary MCC could be detected. While being an atypical presentation, the tumor mass showed an excellent response to the combination of chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy.

Evidence-based management of primary and localized Merkel cell carcinoma: a review

BACKGROUND

Merkel cell carcinoma is a rare and often lethal cutaneous neuroendocrine malignancy with a tendency for early and frequent locoregional and distant metastasis and relapses. It is a tumor of the elderly and immunosuppressed, which most often appears on sun-exposed areas of the body. There is growing interest in characterization of the disease and the best approach to its management. Despite the lack of prospective randomized clinical trials, treatment is evolving.

OBJECTIVE

To provide an updated review of the most current and relevant data concerning the surgical (± radiological) management of Merkel cell carcinoma, including the role of Mohs micrographic surgery.

METHODS

Using relevant MeSH terms, we performed a review of the literature on the above subjects from 1981 to 2011.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

For primary tumors without evidence of organ metastases, surgical excision should be the primary therapy. Owing to the high rate of local metastases, a safety margin of at least 2 cm should be considered. In situations where small, localized tumors and/or special locations necessitate a smaller safety margin, compensation by complete histological examination of the excision margins and perhaps adjuvant radiation therapy should be undertaken. The literature states that benefits of Mohs micrographic surgery (over wide local excision) include tissue conservation and identification of tumors that may require extremely wide excision margins. The majority of data to date supports the use of Mohs surgery in the treatment of Merkel cell carcinoma.

A practical update of surgical management of merkel cell carcinoma of the skin

The role of surgeons in the treatment of Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) of the skin is reviewed, with respect to diagnosis and treatment. Most of the data in the literature are case reports. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment. A wide local excision, with sentinel node (SLN) biopsy, is the recommended treatment of choice. If SLN is involved, nodal dissection should be performed; unless patient is unfit, then regional radiotherapy can be given. Surgeons should always refer patients for assessment of the need for adjuvant treatments. Adjuvant radiotherapy is well tolerated and effective to minimize recurrence. Adjuvant chemotherapy may be considered for selected node-positive patients, as per National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline. Data are insufficient to assess whether adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival. Recurrent disease should be treated by complete surgical resection if possible, followed by radiotherapy and possibly chemotherapy. Generally results of multimodality treatment for recurrent disease are better than lesser treatments. Future research should focus on newer chemotherapy and molecular targeted agents in the adjuvant setting and for gross disease.

Radiotherapy is associated with significant improvement in local and regional control in Merkel cell carcinoma

Introduction

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare tumour of skin. This study is a retrospective audit of patients with MCC from St Vincent’s and Mater Hospital, Sydney, Australia. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of radiotherapy (RT) on the local and regional control of MCC lesions and survival of patients with MCC.

Method

The data bases in anatomical pathology, RT and surgery. We searched for patients having a diagnosis of MCC between 1996 and 2007. Patient, tumour and treatment characteristics were collected and analysed. Univariate survival analysis of categorical variables was conducted with the Kaplan-Meier method together with the Log-Rank test for statistical significance. Continuous variables were assessed using the Cox regression method. Multivariate analysis was performed for significant univariate results.

Results

Sixty seven patients were found. Sixty two who were stage I-III and were treated with radical intent were analysed. 68% were male. The median age was 74 years. Forty-two cases (68%) were stage I or II, and 20 cases (32%) were stage III. For the subset of 42 stage I and II patients, those that had RT to their primary site had a 2-year local recurrence free survival of 89% compared with 36% for patients not receiving RT (p<0.001). The cumulative 2-year regional recurrence free survival for patients having adjuvant regional RT was 84% compared with 43% for patients not receiving this treatment (p<0.001). Immune status at initial surgery was a significant predictor for OS and MCCSS. In a multivariate analysis combining macroscopic size (mm) and immune status at initial surgery, only immune status remained a significant predictor of overall survival (HR=2.096, 95% CI: 1.002-4.385, p=0.049).

Conclusions

RT is associated with significant improvement in local and regional control in Merkel cell carcinoma. Immunosuppression is an important factor in overall survival.