Dosimetry of an In-Line Kilovoltage Imaging System and Implementation in Treatment Planning

Imaging doses for different CBCT protocols on the Halcyon 3.0 linear accelerator - TLD measurements in an anthropomorphic phantom

INTRODUCTION

Image guided radiotherapy allows for particularly conformal tumour irradiation through precise patient positioning. Becoming the standard for radiotherapy, this increases imaging doses to the patient. The Halcyon 3.0 linear accelerator (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) requires daily imaging due to its geometry. For this reason, the accelerator is equipped with on-line kV and MV imaging. However, daily CBCT images required for irradiation apply additional radiation, which increases the dose to normal tissue and therefore can affect the patient's secondary cancer risk. In this study, actual organ doses were measured for the kV system, and a comparison of normal tissue doses for all available kV CBCT protocols was presented to demonstrate differences in imaging doses across entities and protocols. In addition, effective dose and secondary cancer risk from imaging are evaluated.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Measurements were performed with thermoluminescent dosimeters in an anthropomorphic phantom positioned according to each entity (brain, head and neck, breast, lung, pelvis). CBCT images were obtained, using all available pre-set protocols without further adjustment of the parameters. Measured doses for each position and each protocol were then compared and secondary cancer risk of relevant and specifically radiosensitive organs was calculated.

RESULTS

It was found that imaging doses for protocols such as Pelvis and Head could be reduced by up to half using the corresponding Fast and Low Dose modes, respectively. On the other hand, larger field sizes or the Large mode yielded higher doses than their initial protocols. Image Gently was found to spare normal tissue best, however it is not suitable for certain entities due to low image quality or insufficient projection data.

DISCUSSION

By using appropriate kV-CBCT protocols, it is possible to reduce imaging doses to a significant extent and therefore spare healthy tissue. Combined with studies of image quality, the results of this study could lead to adjustments in workflow regarding the choice of protocols used in daily routine. This could prevent unnecessary radiation exposure and reduce secondary cancer risk.

Measuring out-of-field dose to the hippocampus in common radiotherapy indications

BACKGROUND

The high susceptibility of the hippocampus region to radiation injury is likely the causal factor of neurocognitive dysfunctions after exposure to ionizing radiation. Repetitive exposures with even low doses have been shown to impact adult neurogenesis and induce neuroinflammation. We address the question whether the out-of-field doses during radiotherapy of common tumour entities may pose a risk for the neuronal stem cell compartment in the hippocampus.

METHODS

The dose to the hippocampus was determined for a single fraction according to different treatment plans for the selected tumor entities: Point dose measurements were performed in an anthropomorphic Alderson phantom and the out-of-field dose to the hippocampus was measured using thermoluminescence dosimeters.

RESULTS

For carcinomas in the head and neck region the dose exposure to the hippocampal region for a single fraction ranged from to 37.4 to 154.8 mGy. The hippocampal dose was clearly different for naso-, oro- and hypopharynx, with maximal values for nasopharynx carcinoma. In contrast, hippocampal dose levels for breast and prostate cancer ranged between 2.7 and 4.1 mGy, and therefore significantly exceeded the background irradiation level.

CONCLUSION

The mean dose to hippocampus for treatment of carcinomas in the head and neck region is high enough to reduce neurocognitive functions. In addition, care must be taken regarding the out of field doses. The mean dose is mainly related to scattering effects, as is confirmed by the data from breast or prostate treatments, with a very different geometrical set-up but similar dosimetric results.

Evaluation of IGRT-Induced Imaging Doses and Secondary Cancer Risk for SBRT Early Lung Cancer Patients In Silico Study

Objectives:

This study performed dosimetry studies and secondary cancer risk assessments on using electronic portal imaging device (EPID) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) as image guided tools for the early lung cancer patients treated with SBRT.

Methods:

The imaging doses from MV-EPID and kV-CBCT of the Edge accelerator were retrospectively added to sixty-one SBRT treatment plans of early lung cancer patients. The MV-EPID imaging dose (6MV Photon beam) was calculated in Pinnacle TPS, and the kV-CBCT imaging dose was simulated and calculated by modeling of the kV energy beam in TPS using Pinnacle automatic modeling program. Three types of plans, namely Plan_EPID, Plan_CBCT and Plan_origin, were generated with incorporating doses of EPID, CBCT and no imaging, respectively, for analysis. The effects of imaging doses on dose-volume-histogram (DVH) and plan quality were analyzed, and the excess absolute risk (EAR) of secondary cancer for ipsilateral lung was evaluated.

Results:

The regions that received less than 50 cGy were significantly impacted by the imaging doses, while the isodose lines greater than 1000 cGy were barely changed. The DVH values of ipsilateral lung increased the most in Plan_EPID, followed by Plan_CBCT. Compared to Plan_origin on the average, the estimated EAR of ipsilateral lung in Plan_EPID increased by 3.43%, while the corresponding EAR increase in Plan_CBCT was much smaller (about 0.4%). Considering only the contribution of the imaging dose, the EAR values for the ipsilateral lung due to the MV-EPID dose in 5 years,10 years and 15 years were 1.49 cases, 2.09 cases and 2.88 cases per 10⁴PY respectively, and those due to the kV-CBCT dose were about 9 times lower, correspondingly.

Conclusions:

The imaging doses produced by MV-EPID and kV-CBCT had little effects on the target dose coverage. The secondary cancer risk caused by MV-EPID dose is more than 8.5 times that of kV-CBCT.

Image guidance and positioning accuracy in clinical practice: influence of positioning errors and imaging dose on the real dose distribution for head and neck cancer treatment

BACKGROUND

Modern radiotherapy offers the possibility of highly accurate tumor treatment. To benefit from this precision at its best, regular positioning verification is necessary. By the use of image-guided radiotherapy and the application of safety margins the influence of positioning inaccuracies can be counteracted. In this study the effect of additional imaging dose by set-up verification is compared with the effect of dose smearing by positioning inaccuracies for a collective of head-and-neck cancer patients.

METHODS

This study is based on treatment plans of 40 head-and-neck cancer patients. To evaluate the imaging dose several image guidance scenarios with different energies, techniques and frequencies were simulated and added to the original plan. The influence of the positioning inaccuracies was assessed by the use of real applied table shifts for positioning. The isocenters were shifted back appropriately to these values to simulate that no positioning correction had been performed. For the single fractions the shifted plans were summed considering three different scenarios: The summation of only shifted plans, the consideration of the original plan for the fractions with set-up verification, and the addition of the extra imaging dose to the latter. For both effects (additional imaging dose and dose smearing), plans were analyzed and compared considering target coverage, sparing of organs at risk (OAR) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP).

RESULTS

Daily verification of the patient positioning using 3D imaging with MV energies result in non-negligible high doses. kV imaging has only marginal influence on plan quality, primarily related to sparing of organs at risk, even with daily 3D imaging. For this collective, sparing of organs at risk and NTCP are worse due to potential positioning errors.

CONCLUSION

Regular set-up verification is essential for precise radiation treatment. Relating to the additional dose, the use of kV modalities is uncritical for any frequency and technique. Dose smearing due to positioning errors for this collective mainly resulted in a decrease of OAR sparing. Target coverage also suffered from the positioning inaccuracies, especially for individual patients. Taking into account both examined effects the relevance of an extensive IGRT is clearly present, even at the expense of additional imaging dose and time expenditure.

Imaging dose and secondary cancer risk in image-guided radiotherapy of pediatric patients

BACKGROUND

Daily image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) can contribute to cover extended body volumes with low radiation dose. The effect of additional imaging dose on secondary cancer development is modelled for a collective of children with Morbus Hodgkin.

METHODS

Eleven radiotherapy treatment plans from pediatric patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma were retrospectively analyzed, including imaging dose from scenarios using different energies (kV/MV) and planar/cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) techniques. In addition to assessing the effect of imaging dose on organs at risk, the excess average risk (EAR) for developing a secondary carcinoma of the lung or breast was modelled.

RESULTS

Although the variability between the patients is relatively large due to the different target volumes, the additional EAR due to imaging can be consistently determined. For daily 6MV CBCT, the EAR for developing a secondary cancer at age 50 is over 3 cases per 104 PY (patient-years) for the female breast and 0.7-0.8 per 104 PY for the lungs. This can be decreased by using only planar images (< 1 per 104 PY for the breast and 0.1 for the lungs). Similar values are achieved by daily 360° kV CBCT (0.44-0.57 per 104 PY for the breast and 0.08 per 104 PY for the lungs), which is again reduced for daily 200° kV CBCT (0.02 per 104 PY for the lungs and 0.07-0.08 per 104 PY for the breast). These values increase if an older attained age is considered (e.g., for 70 years, by a factor of four for the lungs).

CONCLUSIONS

Daily imaging can be performed with an additional secondary cancer risk of less than 1 per 104 PY if kV CBCT is applied. If MV modalities must be chosen, a similar EAR can be achieved with planar images. A further reduction in risk is possible if the imaging geometry allows for sparing of the breast by a partial rotation underneath the patient.

Image guidance doses delivered during radiotherapy: Quantification, management, and reduction: Report of the AAPM Therapy Physics Committee Task Group 180

BACKGROUND

With radiotherapy having entered the era of image guidance, or image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT), imaging procedures are routinely performed for patient positioning and target localization. The imaging dose delivered may result in excessive dose to sensitive organs and potentially increase the chance of secondary cancers and, therefore, needs to be managed.

AIMS

This task group was charged with: a) providing an overview on imaging dose, including megavoltage electronic portal imaging (MV EPI), kilovoltage digital radiography (kV DR), Tomotherapy MV-CT, megavoltage cone-beam CT (MV-CBCT) and kilovoltage cone-beam CT (kV-CBCT), and b) providing general guidelines for commissioning dose calculation methods and managing imaging dose to patients.

MATERIALS & METHODS

We briefly review the dose to radiotherapy (RT) patients resulting from different image guidance procedures and list typical organ doses resulting from MV and kV image acquisition procedures.

RESULTS

We provide recommendations for managing the imaging dose, including different methods for its calculation, and techniques for reducing it. The recommended threshold beyond which imaging dose should be considered in the treatment planning process is 5% of the therapeutic target dose.

DISCUSSION

Although the imaging dose resulting from current kV acquisition procedures is generally below this threshold, the ALARA principle should always be applied in practice. Medical physicists should make radiation oncologists aware of the imaging doses delivered to patients under their care.

CONCLUSION

Balancing ALARA with the requirement for effective target localization requires that imaging dose be managed based on the consideration of weighing risks and benefits to the patient.

A Monte Carlo study of organ and effective doses of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans in radiotherapy

Cone-beam CT (CBCT) scans utilised for image guided radiation therapy (IGRT) procedures have become an essential part of radiotherapy. The aim of this study was to assess organ and effective doses resulting from new CBCT scan protocols (head, thorax, and pelvis) released with a software upgrade of the kV on-board-imager (OBI) system. Organ and effective doses for protocols of the new software (V2.5) and a previous version (V1.6) were assessed using Monte Carlo (MC) simulations for the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) adult male and female reference computational phantoms. The number of projections and the mAs values were increased and the size of the scan field was extended in the new protocols. Influence of these changes on organ and effective doses of the scans was investigated. The OBI system was modelled in EGSnrc/BEAMnrc, and organ doses were estimated using EGSnrc/DOSXYZnrc. The MC model was benchmarked against experimental measurements. Organ doses resulting from the V2.5 protocols were higher than those of V1.6 for organs that were partially or fully inside the scans fields, and increased by (3-13)%, (10-77)%, and (13-21)% for the head, thorax, and pelvis protocols for both phantoms, respectively. As a result, effective doses rose by 14%, 17%, and 16% for the male phantom, and 13%, 18%, and 17% for the female phantom for the three scan protocols, respectively. The scan field extension for the V2.5 protocols contributed significantly in the dose increases, especially for organs that were partially irradiated such as the thyroid in head and thorax scans and colon in the pelvic scan. The contribution of the mAs values and projection numbers was minimal in the dose increases, up to 2.5%. The field size extension plays a major role in improving the treatment output by including more markers in the field of view to match between CBCT and CT images and hence setting up the patient precisely. Therefore, a trade-off between the risk and benefits of CBCT scans should be considered, and the dose increases should be monitored. Several recommendations have been made for optimisation of the patient dose involved for IGRT procedures.

Abdominal imaging dose in radiology and radiotherapy - Phantom point dose measurements, effective dose and secondary cancer risk

PURPOSE

To compare abdominal imaging dose from 3D imaging in radiology (standard/low-dose/dual-energy CT) and radiotherapy (planning CT, kV cone-beam CT (CBCT)).

METHODS

Dose was measured by thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD's) placed at 86 positions in an anthropomorphic phantom. Point, organ and effective dose were assessed, and secondary cancer risk from imaging was estimated.

RESULTS

Overall dose and mean organ dose comparisons yield significantly lower dose for the optimized radiology protocols (dual-source and care kV), with an average dose of 0.34±0.01 mGy and 0.54±0.01 mGy (average ± standard deviation), respectively. Standard abdominal CT and planning CT involve considerably higher dose (13.58 ± 0.18 mGy and 18.78±0.27 mGy, respectively). The CBCT dose show a dose fall-off near the field edges. On average, dose is reduced as compared with the planning or standard CT (3.79 ± 0.21 mGy for 220° rotation and 7.76 ± 0.37 mGy for 360°), unless the high-quality setting is chosen (20.30 ± 0.96 mGy). The mean organ doses show a similar behavior, which translates to the estimated secondary cancer risk. The modelled risk is in the range between 0.4 cases per million patient years (PY) for the radiological scans dual-energy and care kV, and 300 cases per million PY for the high-quality CBCT setting.

CONCLUSIONS

Modern radiotherapy imaging techniques (while much lower in dose than radiotherapy), involve considerably more dose to the patient than modern radiology techniques. Given the frequency of radiotherapy imaging, a further reduction in radiotherapy imaging dose appears to be both desirable and technically feasible.

Influence of daily imaging on plan quality and normal tissue toxicity for prostate cancer radiotherapy

Background

Modern radiotherapy offers various possibilities for image guided verification of patient positioning. Different clinically relevant IGRT (image guided radiotherapy) scenarios were considered with regard to their influence on dosimetric plan quality and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP).

Methods

This study is based on treatment plans of 50 prostate patients. We evaluate the clinically performed IGRT and simulate the influence of different daily IGRT scenarios on plan quality. Imaging doses of planar and cone-beam-CT (CBCT) images for three different energies (6 MV, 1 MV and 121 kV) were added to the treatment plans. The plan quality of the different scenarios was assessed by a visual inspection of the dose distribution and dose-volume-histogram (DVH) and a statistical analysis of DVH criteria. In addition, an assessment of the normal tissue complication probability was performed.

Results

Daily 1MV-CBCTs result in undesirable high dose regions in the target volume. The DVH shows that the scenarios with actual imaging performed, daily kV-CBCT and daily 6MV imaging (1x CBCT, 4x planar images per week) do not differ exceedingly from the original plan; especially imaging with daily kV-CBCT has little influence to the sparing of organs at risk. In contrast, daily 1MV- CBCT entails an additional dose of up to two fraction doses. Due to the additional dose amount some DVH constraints for plan acceptability could no longer be satisfied, especially for the daily 1MV-CBCT scenario. This scenario also shows increased NTCP for the rectum.

Conclusion

Daily kV-CBCT has negligible influence on plan quality and is commendable for the clinical routine. If no kV-modality is available, a daily IGRT scenario with one CBCT per week and planar axial images on the other days should be preferred over daily MV-CBCT.

Imaging dose from cone beam computed tomography in radiation therapy

Imaging dose in radiation therapy has traditionally been ignored due to its low magnitude and frequency in comparison to therapeutic dose used to treat patients. The advent of modern, volumetric, imaging modalities, often as an integral part of linear accelerators, has facilitated the implementation of image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT), which is often accomplished by daily imaging of patients. Daily imaging results in additional dose delivered to patient that warrants new attention be given to imaging dose. This review summarizes the imaging dose delivered to patients as the result of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging performed in radiation therapy using current methods and equipment. This review also summarizes methods to calculate the imaging dose, including the use of Monte Carlo (MC) and treatment planning systems (TPS). Peripheral dose from CBCT imaging, dose reduction methods, the use of effective dose in describing imaging dose, and the measurement of CT dose index (CTDI) in CBCT systems are also reviewed.

Image quality and dose distributions of three linac-based imaging modalities

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Linac-based patient imaging is possible with a variety of techniques using different photon energies. The purpose of this work is to compare three imaging systems operating at 6 MV, flattening free filter (FFF) 1 MV, and 121 kV.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The dose distributions of all pretreatment set-up images (over 1,000) were retrospectively calculated on the planning computed tomography (CT) images for all patients with prostate and head-and-neck cancer treated at our institution in 2013. We analyzed the dose distribution and the dose to organs at risk.

RESULTS

For head-and-neck cancer patients, the imaging dose from 6-MV cone beam CT (CBCT) reached maximum values at around 8 cGy. The 1-MV CBCT dose was about 63-79 % of the 6-MV CBCT dose for all organs at risk. Planar imaging reduced the imaging dose from CBCT to 30-40 % for both megavoltage modalities. The dose from the kilovoltage CBCT was 4-10 % of the 6-MV CBCT dose. For prostate cancer patients, the maximum dose from 6-MV CBCT reached 13-15 cGy, and was reduced to 66-73 % for 1 MV. Planar imaging reduces the MV CBCT dose to 10-20 %. The kV CBCT dose is 15-20 % of the 6-MV CBCT dose, slightly higher than the dose from MV axes. The dose distributions differ markedly in response to the different beam profiles and dose-depth characteristics.