Incidental Prophylactic Nodal Irradiation and Patterns of Nodal Relapse in Inoperable Early Stage NSCLC Patients Treated With SBRT: A Case-Matched Analysis

Repeated HyperArc radiosurgery for recurrent intracranial metastases and dosimetric analysis of recurrence pattern to account for diffuse dose effect on microscopical disease

Aims

Evaluate effectiveness and safety of multiple HyperArc courses and patterns of progression in patients affected by BMs with intracranial progression.

Methods

56 patients were treated for 702 BMs with 197 (range 2-8) HyperArc courses in case of exclusive intracranial progression. Primary end-point was the overall survival (OS), secondary end-points were intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS), toxicity, local control (LC), neurological death (ND), and whole-brain RT (WBRT)-free survival. Site of progression was evaluated against isodoses levels (0, 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 10, 13, 15, 20, and 24 Gy.).

Results

The 1-year OS was 70 %, and the median was 20.8 months (17-36). At the univariate analysis (UVA) biological equivalent dose (BED) > 51.3 Gy and non-melanoma histology significantly correlated with OS. The median time to iPFS was 4.9 months, and the 1-year iPFS was 15 %. Globally, 538 new BMs occurred after the first HA cycle in patients with extracranial disease controlled. 96.4 % of them occurred within the isodoses range 0-7 Gy as follows: 26.6 % (0 Gy), 16.5 % (1 Gy), 16.5 % (2 Gy), 20.1 % (3 Gy), 13.1 % (5 Gy), 3.4 % (7 Gy) (p = 0.00). Radionecrosis occurred in 2 metastases (0.28 %). No clinical toxicity of grade 3 or higher occurred during follow-up. One- and 2-year LC was 90 % and 79 %, respectively. At the UVA BED > 70 Gy and non-melanoma histology were significant predictors of higher LC. The 2-year WBRT-free survival was 70 %. After a median follow-up of 17.4 months, 12 patients deceased by ND.

Conclusion

Intracranical relapses can be safely and effectively treated with repeated HyperArc, with the aim to postpone or avoid WBRT. Diffuse dose by volumetric RT might reduce microscopic disease also at relatively low levels, potentially acting as a virtual CTV. Neurological death is not the most common cause of death in this population, which highlights the impact of extracranial disease on overall survival.

Two Recombinant Bacteriocins, Rhamnosin and Lysostaphin, Show Synergistic Anticancer Activity Against Gemcitabine-Resistant Cholangiocarcinoma Cell Lines

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), a bile duct cancer with a high mortality rate, has a poor prognosis due to its highly invasive and drug-resistant phenotypes. More effective and selective therapies are urgently needed. Bacteriocins are broad-spectrum antimicrobial peptides/proteins produced by bacterial strains to compete with other bacteria. Recent studies have reported that bacteriocins exhibit anticancer properties against various cancer cell lines with minimal toxicity toward normal cells. In this study, two types of recombinant bacteriocins, rhamnosin from probiotic Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus and lysostaphin from Staphylococcus simulans, were highly produced in Escherichia coli and subsequently purified via immobilized-Ni2+ affinity chromatography. When their anticancer activity was investigated against CCA cell lines, both rhamnosin and lysostaphin were found capable of inhibiting the growth of CCA cell lines in a dose-dependent fashion but were less toxic toward a normal cholangiocyte cell line. Rhamnosin and lysostaphin as single treatments could suppress the growth of gemcitabine-resistant cell lines to the same extent as or more than they suppressed the parental counterparts. A combination of both bacteriocins more strongly inhibited growth and enhanced cell apoptosis in both parental and gemcitabine-resistant cells partly through the increased expression of the proapoptotic genes BAX, and caspase-3, -8, and -9. In conclusion, this is the first report to demonstrate an anticancer property of rhamnosin and lysostaphin. Using these bacteriocins as single agents or in combination would be effective against drug-resistant CCA.

Pulmonary interstitial lymphography: A prospective trial with potential impact on stereotactic ablative radiotherapy planning for early-stage lung cancer

This prospective feasibility trial investigated pulmonary interstitial lymphography to identify thoracic primary nodal drainage (PND). A post-hoc analysis of nodal recurrences was compared with PND for patients with early-stage lung cancer; larger studies are needed to establish correlation. Exploratory PND-inclusive stereotactic ablative radiotherapy plans were assessed for dosimetric feasibility.

Predicting cancer relapse following lung stereotactic radiotherapy: an external validation study using real-world evidence

Purpose

For patients receiving lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR), evidence suggests that high peritumor density predicts an increased risk of microscopic disease (MDE) and local-regional failure, but only if there is low or heterogenous incidental dose surrounding the tumor (GTV). A data-mining method (Cox-per-radius) has been developed to investigate this dose-density interaction. We apply the method to predict local relapse (LR) and regional failure (RF) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Methods

199 patients treated in a routine setting were collated from a single institution for training, and 76 patients from an external institution for validation. Three density metrics (mean, 90th percentile, standard deviation (SD)) were studied in 1mm annuli between 0.5cm inside and 2cm outside the GTV boundary. Dose SD and fraction of volume receiving less than 30Gy were studied in annuli 0.5-2cm outside the GTV to describe incidental MDE dosage. Heat-maps were created that correlate with changes in LR and RF rates due to the interaction between dose heterogeneity and density at each distance combination. Regions of significant improvement were studied in Cox proportional hazards models, and explored with and without re-fitting in external data. Correlations between the dose component of the interaction and common dose metrics were reported.

Results

Local relapse occurred at a rate of 6.5% in the training cohort, and 18% in the validation cohort, which included larger and more centrally located tumors. High peritumor density in combination with high dose variability (0.5 - 1.6cm) predicts LR. No interactions predicted RF. The LR interaction improved the predictive ability compared to using clinical variables alone (optimism-adjusted C-index; 0.82 vs 0.76). Re-fitting model coefficients in external data confirmed the importance of this interaction (C-index; 0.86 vs 0.76). Dose variability in the 0.5-1.6 cm annular region strongly correlates with heterogeneity inside the target volume (SD; ρ = 0.53 training, ρ = 0.65 validation).

Conclusion

In these real-world cohorts, the combination of relatively high peritumor density and high dose variability predicts increase in LR, but not RF, following lung SABR. This external validation justifies potential use of the model to increase low-dose CTV margins for high-risk patients.

Effect of the normal liver mean dose on intrahepatic recurrence in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after receiving liver stereotactic body radiation therapy

•

The normal liver mean dosage is rarely studied in its association with metastasis related survival.

•

Higher normal liver mean dosage was related to a better intra-hepatic progression free survival.

•

No associations were found between normal liver mean dose with Local control rate, Overall Survival, Distant Metastasis Free Survival, Progression Free Survival.

Background and purpose

This study aims to evaluate whether dosimetric parameters affect the intrahepatic out-field recurrence or distant metastasis-free survival following the stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Materials and methods

A total of 76 patients with HCC who were treated with SBRT from January 2015 to May 2020 were included in this retrospective study. The main clinical endpoints considered were intrahepatic out-field free survival (OutFFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). The target parameters and the liver were documented including tumor diameters, gross tumor volume (GTV), Liver minus GTV volume (LGV), and Liver minus GTV mean dose (LGD). Multivariable Cox regression with forward stepwise selection was performed to identify independent risk factors for OutFFS and DMFS. Maximally selected rank statistics were used to determine the most informative cut-off value for age and LGD.

Results

The median follow-up was 28.2 months (range, 7.7–74.5 months). LGD higher than 12.54 Gy [HR, 0.861(0.747–0.993); p = 0.040] and age greater than 67-year-old [HR, 0.966(0.937–0.997); p = 0.030] are two independent predictors of OutFFS, previous TACE treatment [HR, 0.117(0.015–0.891); p = 0.038] was an independent predictor of DMFS.

Conclusions

The results of this study suggested that the higher the dose received by the normal liver (greater than 12.54 Gy) the better the intrahepatic out-field recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate. Further study is warranted to confirm and to better understand this phenomenon.

Impact of dose to lung outside the planning target volume on distant metastasis or progression after SBRT for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer

Mean dose (EQD2) to 3-cm shell of lung surrounding the PTV was evaluated for association with distant metastasis and PFS after SBRT for stage I NSCLC. Dose was uniformly above previously determined threshold and metastasis was uncommon. An association between outcomes and mean EQD2 could not be confirmed or refuted.

Radiation Modalities Used in Lung Cancer: An Overview for Thoracic Surgeons

Radiation is a constantly evolving technology which plays a role in the management of lung cancer in a variety of settings: as an adjunct to surgery, definitively, and palliatively. Key aspects of radiation oncology-including acute and chronic toxicities of thoracic radiation and rationale for choosing one modality of radiation over another-may be obscure to those outside the field. We aim to provide a useful overview relevant for the thoracic surgeon of radiation technology and delivery. A review was performed of salient articles identifying radiation technologies used in lung cancer which were summarized and expounded upon with focus on integrating their history, evolution, and landmark trials establishing basis of their use. This article reviews the four fundamental means of external beam radiation employed in managing lung cancer and provides visual examples of comparison plans. We also touch on potential practice-changing developments in regards to proton therapy and radiation in the era of immunotherapy. Radiation oncology has evolved considerably over time to become a critical part of lung cancer management, particularly in early-stage inoperable disease and locally advanced disease. Maximizing tumor control while minimizing toxicity drives treatment strategies. Knowledge of these fundamentals will help the thoracic surgeon answer many questions patients pose regarding radiation.

Association between incidental dose outside the prostate and tumor control after modern image-guided radiotherapy

Background and purpose

External beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer deposits incidental dose to a region surrounding the target volume. Previously, an association was identified between tumor control and incidental dose for patients treated with conventional radiotherapy. We investigated whether such an association exists for patients treated using intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and tighter margins.

Materials and methods

Computed tomography scans and three-dimensional treatment planning dose distributions were available from the Dutch randomized HYPRO trial for 397 patients in the standard fractionation arm (39 × 2 Gy) and 407 patients in the hypofractionation arm (19 × 3.4 Gy), mainly delivered using online image-guided IMRT. Endpoint was any treatment failure within 5 years. A mapping of 3D dose distributions between anatomies was performed based on distance to the surface of the prostate delineation. Mean mapped dose distributions were computed for patient groups with and without failure, obtaining dose difference distributions. Random patient permutations were performed to derive p values and to identify relevant regions.

Results

For high-risk patients treated in the conventional arm, higher incidental dose was significantly associated with a higher probability of tumor control in both univariate and multivariate analysis. The locations of the excess dose mainly overlapped with the position of obturator internus muscles at about 2.5 cm from the prostate surface. No such relationship could be established for intermediate-risk patients.

Conclusions

An association was established between reduced treatment failure and the delivery of incidental dose outside the prostate for high-risk patients treated using conventionally fractionated IMRT.

Nodal recurrences after stereotactic body radiotherapy for early stage non-small-cell lung cancer

Lobectomy is considered the standard of care for early stage non-small-cell lung cancer. However, for those patients who remain unfit to undergo surgery due to advanced age, poor performance status, comorbidities, poor pulmonary reserve or a combination of these are now treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Due to its noninvasive nature, lower cost, lower toxicity, reduced recovery time and equivalent efficacy, even medically operable patients are attracted to the option of SBRT despite the lack of level I evidence. Thus, studying the incidence and patterns of recurrence after SBRT help in understanding the magnitude of the problem, risk factors associated with the different patterns of recurrence, and aid in devising strategies to prevent them in future. Nodal recurrences are not uncommon after SBRT and can potentially lead to further seeding for distant metastases and ultimately poor survival. This review is aimed at reviewing the published data on the incidence of nodal recurrences after SBRT and compare it to surgery, identify potential risk factors for recurrence, salvage treatment options and prevention strategies.

Lung cancer staging: State of the art in the era of ablative therapies and surgical segmentectomy

Implementation of lung cancer screening and improvements in imaging are expected to increase the proportion of lung cancer diagnosed at an early stage. The standard of care has historically been anatomic lobectomy; however, there is now an array of surgical and non-surgical approaches for management of local disease either in active use or under investigation. By their nature, these new modalities offer a theoretical trade-off of reduced morbidity in exchange for reduced efficacy in the setting of advanced disease. It is therefore critical that patients being considered for these approaches (e.g. surgical segmentectomy and SABR) be accurately staged to maximize the potential for definitive treatment. In this article, we will review current approaches to the staging of patients being considered for segmentectomy or ablation. This will serve as a foundation to highlight important questions deserving further investigation.

[Prognosis factors after lung stereotactic body radiotherapy for non-small cell lung carcinoma]

Lung cancer is the fourth most common cancer in France with a prevalence of 30,000 new cases per year. Lobectomy surgery with dissection is the gold standard treatment for T1-T2 localized non-small cell lung carcinoma. A segmentectomy may be proposed to operable patients but fragile from a respiratory point of view. For inoperable patients or patients with unsatisfactory pulmonary function tests, local treatment with stereotactic radiotherapy may be proposed to achieve local control rates ranging from 85 to 95% at 3-5 years. Several studies have examined prognostic factors after stereotaxic pulmonary radiotherapy. We conducted a general review of the literature to identify factors affecting local control.

[Lung cancer and elective nodal irradiation: A solved issue?]

Lung cancer treatment is a heavy workload for radiation oncologist and that field showed many evolutions over the last two decades. The issue about target volume was raised when treatment delivery became more precise with the development of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. Initially based upon surgical series, numerous retrospective and prospective studies aimed to evaluate the risk of elective nodal failure of involved-field radiotherapy compared to standard large field elective nodal irradiation. In every setting, locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer, localized non-small cell lung cancer, localized small cell lung cancer, exclusive chemoradiation or postoperative radiotherapy, most of the studies showed no significant difference between involved-field radiotherapy or elective nodal irradiation with elective nodal failure rate under 5% at 2 years, provided staging had been done with modern imaging and diagnostic techniques (positron emission tomography scan, endoscopy, etc.). Moreover, if reducing irradiated volumes are safe regarding recurrences, involved-field radiotherapy allowed dose escalation while reducing acute and late oesophageal, cardiac and pulmonary toxicities. Consequently, major clinical trials involving radiotherapy initiated in the last two decades and international clinical guidelines recommended omission of elective nodal irradiation in favour of in-field radiotherapy.

Pattern of recurrence after CyberKnife stereotactic body radiotherapy for peripheral early non-small cell lung cancer

Background

The treatment efficacy after CyberKnife stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) have not been adequately addressed. The purpose of this study was to investigate pattern of recurrence according to irradiation field after CyberKnife SBRT for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

This retrospective study included patients with peripheral cT1/2N0M0 NSCLC that was treated with SBRT using a CyberKnife between May 2013 and March 2016 at single institute and followed up by more than two imaging examinations. Both operable and inoperable patients were included. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Cumulative incidence curves of recurrence were calculated and compared using the Gray's test.

Results

Total 71 patients were included and analyzed in this study. The median follow-up period for surviving patients was 34 months (range, 7-64 months). The 2-year OS and PFS rate were 93% (95% CI: 83-97%) and 77% (95% CI: 65-86%), respectively. The 2-year cumulative incidence rate of infield recurrence and out-of-field recurrence were 6% (95% CI: 2-14%) and 17% (95% CI: 9-27%), respectively. Gross tumor volume (GTV) ≥9 mL and diagnosis-to-treatment interval (DTI) ≥90 days were significantly associated with infield recurrence (P<0.001 and P=0.007), and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation was significantly associated with out-of-field recurrence (P=0.014).

Conclusions

Treatment efficacy after CyberKnife SBRT for peripheral early-stage NSCLC was identical to previous conventional linac-based SBRT reports. With short follow-up period, it was found that GTV and DTI were the significant predictive factor of infield recurrence, and EGFR mutation was the significant predictive factor of out-of-field recurrence.

Pretreatment 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Standardized Uptake Values and Tumor Size in Medically Inoperable Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer Is Prognostic of Overall 2-Year Survival After Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine prognostic value of tumor size and metabolic activity on survival for patients with early stage nonsmall cell lung cancer receiving stereotactic body radiation therapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the patients who underwent positron emission tomography-computed tomography scan before stereotactic body radiation therapy treatment. Tumor diameter, tumor volume, maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), standardized uptake value (SUV) average, and SUV volume were obtained. Cox regression analyses were performed to determine the associations between tumor characteristics and survival.

RESULTS

The patients with large tumors and high SUVmax have worse survival than patients with small tumors and low SUVmax (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.47, P = 0.007). Patients with small tumors and high SUVmax (HR = 1.80; P = 0.24) and large tumors and low SUVmax (HR = 1.55; P = 0.43) had increased risk of death compared with patients with small tumors and low SUVmax.

CONCLUSIONS

Both increased tumor size and metabolic activity are associated with increased risk of death. Combining size and metabolic activity together is superior for predicting 2-year survival and identifying patients for whom survival is statistically worse.

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy in treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: Unsolved questions and frontiers ahead

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has been recognized as a standard alternative treatment to surgery for inoperable early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Guaranteed local control rates over 90% makes oncologists wonder whether SABR is qualified enough to challenge surgery in operable patients. The role of SABR for centrally located lesions would be another question because of the increased risk of severe toxic effect. Plenty of studies suggest that optimization of dose regimen and appropriate case selection would be helpful. Additionally, the effect of adjuvant therapy following SABR in selected patients is worth looking forward, given that it significantly reduced risk of recurrence after complete resection. A consensus about salvage treatment after SABR also needs, given the current diversity of options. Finally, witnessing the emergence of proton therapy and immunotherapy, we believe that the future of SABR lay behind these novel forms of treatment.

Nodal recurrence after stereotactic body radiotherapy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer: Incidence and proposed risk factors

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an alternative to surgery for patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are inoperable due to comorbid disease or who refuse surgery. SBRT results in an excellent local control rate of more than 90%, which is comparable to surgery, while short and long-term overall toxicity is low. Surgically treated patients are often more extensively staged pre-operatively, e.g. with endobronchial ultrasound and/or mediastinoscopy, and typically undergo intra-operative lymph node dissection or sampling. Occult nodal metastases (ONM), detected by lymph node dissection, have been shown to increase the incidence of regional recurrence (RR) after surgery, which is associated with poor outcome. In patients undergoing SBRT, however, definite pathological nodal staging is lacking and so other ways to identify patients at high risk for ONM and RR are desirable. The aim of this systematic review is to summarize the incidence of, and risk factors for, RR after SBRT and compare these to those after surgery. The available evidence shows the incidence of RR after SBRT or surgery to be comparable, despite more elaborate pre- and intra-operative lymph node evaluation in surgical patients. However, the fact that this finding is based on mostly retrospective studies in which the majority of patients treated with SBRT were inoperable, needs to be taken into consideration. For now, there is no evidence that inoperable clinical stage I patients with no indication of pathological lymph nodes on PET/CT will benefit from more invasive lymph node staging prior to SBRT.

Predictors and Patterns of Regional Recurrence Following Lung SBRT: A Report From the Elekta Lung Research Group

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study was to determine the predictors and patterns of regional recurrence (RR) following stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for primary lung cancers.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Details of patient factors, treatment, and outcome factors were extracted from a multi-institutional (5) database. All events were calculated from the end of radiotherapy. Estimates of local recurrence, RR, and distant metastases (DM) were calculated using the competing risk method. Cause-specific and overall survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Details of locations and number of simultaneous RRs were categorized by lymph node anatomic station.

RESULTS

A total of 734 patients were analyzed. The median follow-up was 3.0 years in surviving patients. Four hundred seventy-six (65%) patients had pathologic proof of disease. There were 64 patients with RR. The 2-year local recurrence, RR, and distant metastases rates were 5.6%, 9.0%, and 14.6% respectively. The 2-year cause-specific and overall survival were 89.9% and 63.7%, respectively. There were 136 simultaneous sites of RR. There were 21 recurrences in stations 4R (15.4%), 9 (6.6%) in 4L, 30 (22%) in 7, 19 (13.9%) in 10R, and 14 (10.3%) in 10L. The most common stations for isolated recurrence (n = 19) were station 7 (n = 5; 26.3%) and station 10R (n = 6; 31.6%). The most common RR levels were stations 4 and 7 for right and left upper lobe, stations 5, 7, and 10 for left lower lobe tumors, and stations 7 and 10 for right lower lobe tumors.

CONCLUSION

Stations 4, 7, and 10 were the most common stations for RR. These patterns of recurrence may guide nodal staging procedures prior to SBRT.

Involved field radiotherapy (IFRT) versus elective nodal irradiation (ENI) for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of incidence of elective nodal failure (ENF)

Background and purpose

The use of involved field radiotherapy (IFRT) has generated concern about the increasing incidence of elective nodal failure (ENF) in contrast to elective nodal irradiation (ENI). This meta-analysis aimed to provide more reliable and up-to-date evidence on the incidence of ENF between IFRT and ENI.

Materials and methods

We searched three databases for eligible studies where locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients received IFRT or ENI. Outcome of interest was the incidence of ENF. The fixed-effects model was used to pool outcomes across the studies.

Results

There were 3 RCTs and 3 cohort studies included with low risk of bias. There was no significant difference in incidence of ENF between IFRT and ENI either among RCTs (RR = 1.38, 95 % CI: 0.59–3.25, p = 0.46) or among cohort studies (RR = 0.99, 95 % CI: 0.46–2.10, p = 0.97). There was also no significant difference in incidence of ENF between IFRT and ENI when RCTs and cohort studies were combined (RR = 1.15, 95 % CI: 0.65–2.01, p = 0.64). I² of test for heterogeneity was 0 %.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis provides more reliable and stable evidence that there is no significant difference in incidence of ENF between IFRT and ENI.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13014-016-0698-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for T3 and T4N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer

To evaluate the outcomes and feasibility of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for cT3 and cT4N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), 25 patients with localized primary NSCLC diagnosed as cT3 or cT4N0M0, given SBRT between May 2005 and July 2013, were analyzed. All patients had inoperable tumors. The major reasons for tumors being unresectable were insufficient respiratory function for curative resection, advanced age (>80 years old) or technically inoperable due to invasion into critical organs. The median patient age was 79 years (range; 60-86). The median follow-up duration was 25 months (range: 5-100 months). The 2-year overall survival rates for T3 and T4 were 57% and 69%, respectively. The 2-year local control rates for T3 and T4 were 91% and 68%, respectively. As for toxicities, Grade 0-1, Grade 2 and Grade 3 radiation pneumonitis occurred in 23, 1 and 1 patient, respectively. No other acute or symptomatic late toxicities were reported. Thirteen patients who had no local, mediastinal or intrapulmonary progression at one year after SBRT underwent pulmonary function testing. The median variation in pre-SBRT and post-SBRT forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) values was -0.1 (-0.8-0.8). This variation was not statistically significant (P = 0.56). Forced vital capacity (FVC), vital capacity (VC), %VC and %FEV1 also showed no significant differences. SBRT for cT3 and cT4N0M0 NSCLC was both effective and feasible. Considering the favorable survival and low morbidity rate, SBRT is a potential treatment option for cT3 and cT4N0M0 NSCLC.

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for centrally located early stage non-small-cell lung cancer: what we have learned

Image-guided stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR; also called stereotactic body radiotherapy or radiosurgery) has become a standard treatment for medically inoperable peripherally located stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and can achieve local control rates in excess of 90%. However, the role of SABR for centrally located lesions remains controversial because of concerns about the potential for severe toxic effects. When cutting-edge technologies and knowledge-based optimization of SABR planning that considers both target coverage and normal tissue sparing are used, some patients with central lesions can be safely and effectively cured of early stage NSCLC. However, delivery of ablative doses of radiation to critical structures such as bronchial tree, esophagus, major vessels, heart, and the brachial plexus/phrenic nerve could produce severe, potentially lethal toxic effects. Here, we address the current understanding of indications, dose regimens, planning optimization, and normal tissue dose-volume constraints for using SABR to treat central NSCLC.