1
|
Janoray G, Bruguière E, Mazurier J, Dudouet P, Guillotreau J, Tollon C, Labarthe P, Seguin P, Latorzeff I. Long-term evaluation of the safety of a rectal-prostate spacer, the ProSpace® balloon, in patients treated with radiotherapy for prostate cancer. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:934. [PMID: 39090577 PMCID: PMC11292989 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12692-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2024] [Indexed: 08/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Due to the close proximity of the prostate and rectum, rectal toxicity remains a major problem in patient treated by radiotherapy for prostate adenocarcinoma. One method of increasing the distance between the prostate and the rectum is to use a spacer implanted into the rectoprostatic space. This report describes the long-term outcomes obtained with a new ballon spacer. METHODS Patients treated with curative radiotherapy for low- or intermediate-risk prostate adenocarcinoma, who underwent insertion of the ProSpace® (BioProtect Ltd, Tzur Yigal, Israel) rectal-prostate balloon spacer, were included. The main objective was to evaluate the dosimetric benefit of the spacer for OARs. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the feasibility and tolerability of ProSpace® balloon placement and to evaluate its long-term therapeutic efficacy and tolerance. RESULTS Between October 2013 and March 2015, 16 patients were enrolled in the Pasteur Clinic, Toulouse, France. The median follow-up was 85.5 months. From top to bottom, the space created was a mean of 16.3 mm (range: 11-20.5 mm) at the base of the prostate, 12.1 mm (range: 4-16 mm) at the middle and 8.9 mm at the apex (range: 5-15 mm). On average, rectal volumes receiving a dose of 70 Gy, 60 Gy and 50 Gy were significantly lower after balloon implantation: -4.81 cc (1.5 vs. 6.3; p < 0.0005), -8.08 cc (6.4 vs. 14.5; p = 0.002) and -9.06 cc (16.7 vs. 25.7; p = 0.003), respectively. There were significant differences in coverage after balloon implantation: Median V95% (p < 0.0005), median Dmin (p = 0.01) and median V98% (p < 0.001) were higher after balloon implantation. At 5 years, cumulative gastrointestinal toxicity was grade 1 in 6% (1/16 patients). No toxicity of grade 2 or higher was found. At 5 years, no urinary toxicity grade 3 or 4 toxicity was found. The QoL was not deteriorated. CONCLUSIONS The use of the ProSpace® balloon seems to be well accepted by patients, allowing a double dosimetric gain: a decrease in doses received by the rectum and an improvement in the coverage of the high-risk PTV. The long-term gastrointestinal toxicity remains low and QoL is preserved in all treated patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Janoray
- Oncologie Radiothérapie, Groupe Orion, Clinique Pasteur, 31300, Toulouse, France.
| | - E Bruguière
- Service d'Imagerie Médicale, Clinique Pasteur, 31300, Toulouse, France
| | - J Mazurier
- Oncologie Radiothérapie, Groupe Orion, Clinique Pasteur, 31300, Toulouse, France
| | - P Dudouet
- Oncologie Radiothérapie, Groupe Orion, Clinique du Pont de Chaume, 82000, Montauban, France
| | - J Guillotreau
- Service d'Urologie, Clinique Pasteur, 31300, Toulouse, France
| | - C Tollon
- Service d'Urologie, Clinique Croix du Sud, 31130, Quint-Fonsegrives, France
| | - P Labarthe
- Service d'Urologie, Clinique Des Cèdres, 31700, Cornebarrieu, France
| | - P Seguin
- Service d'Urologie, Clinique d'Occitanie, 31600, Muret, France
| | - I Latorzeff
- Oncologie Radiothérapie, Groupe Orion, Clinique Pasteur, 31300, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
McCullum LB, Karagoz A, Dede C, Garcia R, Nosrat F, Hemmati M, Hosseinian S, Schaefer AJ, Fuller CD. Markov models for clinical decision-making in radiation oncology: A systematic review. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024. [PMID: 38766899 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
The intrinsic stochasticity of patients' response to treatment is a major consideration for clinical decision-making in radiation therapy. Markov models are powerful tools to capture this stochasticity and render effective treatment decisions. This paper provides an overview of the Markov models for clinical decision analysis in radiation oncology. A comprehensive literature search was conducted within MEDLINE using PubMed, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Only studies published from 2000 to 2023 were considered. Selected publications were summarized in two categories: (i) studies that compare two (or more) fixed treatment policies using Monte Carlo simulation and (ii) studies that seek an optimal treatment policy through Markov Decision Processes (MDPs). Relevant to the scope of this study, 61 publications were selected for detailed review. The majority of these publications (n = 56) focused on comparative analysis of two or more fixed treatment policies using Monte Carlo simulation. Classifications based on cancer site, utility measures and the type of sensitivity analysis are presented. Five publications considered MDPs with the aim of computing an optimal treatment policy; a detailed statement of the analysis and results is provided for each work. As an extension of Markov model-based simulation analysis, MDP offers a flexible framework to identify an optimal treatment policy among a possibly large set of treatment policies. However, the applications of MDPs to oncological decision-making have been understudied, and the full capacity of this framework to render complex optimal treatment decisions warrants further consideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas B McCullum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Aysenur Karagoz
- Department of Computational Applied Mathematics & Operations Research, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Cem Dede
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Raul Garcia
- Department of Computational Applied Mathematics & Operations Research, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Fatemeh Nosrat
- Department of Computational Applied Mathematics & Operations Research, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Mehdi Hemmati
- School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA
| | | | - Andrew J Schaefer
- Department of Computational Applied Mathematics & Operations Research, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Clifton D Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Computational Applied Mathematics & Operations Research, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Giacometti V, McLaughlin O, Comiskey P, Marshall H, Houlihan OA, Whitten G, Prise KM, Hounsell AR, Jain S, McGarry CK. Validation of a Quality Metric Score to Assess the Placement of Hydrogel Rectal Spacer in Patients Treated With Prostate Stereotactic Radiation Therapy. Adv Radiat Oncol 2024; 9:101396. [PMID: 38304109 PMCID: PMC10831189 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the quality of the interspace between the prostate and rectum and assess the effect on the dose to the rectum by measuring the spacer quality score (SQS) before and after implanting a hydrogel rectal spacer. Methods and Materials Thirty patients with prostate cancer were treated with stereotactic ablative body radiation therapy as part of the SPORT clinical trial. Each patient had a 10 mL polyethylene glycol hydrogel spacer inserted transperineally. Computed tomography scans were acquired before and after spacer insertion, 10MV flattening filter free (FFF) stereotactic ablative body radiation therapy (SABR) treatment plans were generated using each image set. To calculate the SQS, the prostate-rectal interspace (PRI) was measured in the anterior-posterior orientation, parallel to the anatomic midline at the prostate base, apex, and midgland on the prespacer and postspacer computed tomography. Measurements were taken in 3 transverse positions between the prostate and the rectum, and PRI scores of 0, 1, and 2 were assigned if the interspace between prostate and rectum was <0.3, 0.3 to 0.9, or ≥1 cm, respectively. The overall SQS was the lowest of the PRI scores. Differences between prespacer and postspacer PRIs and SQS were investigated by performing Fisher's exact test and differences between doses to the rectum were investigated by performing the paired samples Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Student t test. Results Statistically significant differences between prespacer versus postspacer patients were found when grouping patients according to their overall SQS. The PRI summary score did not reach statistical significance between prespacer and postspacer at the base but was significantly higher for the prostate midline and apex. Statistically significant differences in some rectum dose-volume metrics were found when grouping patients according to their PRIs and SQS. Conclusions SQS before and after the spacer insertion was evaluated and was found to be correlated with pre- and postspacer rectal dosimetry. Sources of improvement of the SQS scoring metric and limitations are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Giacometti
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Owen McLaughlin
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Patrick Comiskey
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Hannah Marshall
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Orla A. Houlihan
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Glenn Whitten
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Kevin M. Prise
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Alan R. Hounsell
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Suneil Jain
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Conor K. McGarry
- Patrick G. Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gejerman G, Goldstein MM, Chao M, Shore N, Lederer J, Crawford ED, Bukkapatnam R, Sylvester J, Orio PF. Barrigel Spacer Injection Technique. Pract Radiat Oncol 2024; 14:e57-e61. [PMID: 37657504 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2023.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Revised: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 09/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Glen Gejerman
- New Jersey Urology, VillageMD Research Institute, Saddle Brook, New Jersey.
| | - Martin M Goldstein
- New Jersey Urology, VillageMD Research Institute, Saddle Brook, New Jersey
| | - Michael Chao
- Ringwood Private Hospital, East Ringwood, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Neal Shore
- Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
| | | | | | | | | | - Peter F Orio
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ramot Y, Levin-Harrus T, Ezratty A, Steiner M, Ezov N, Domb AJ, Abdel-Haq M, Shohat S, Aperman L, Adler L, Dolkart O, Nyska A. Assessment of Bioprotect's Biodegradable Balloon System as a Rectal Spacer in Radiotherapy: An Animal Study on Tissue Response and Biocompatibility. Pharmaceutics 2023; 15:2744. [PMID: 38140085 PMCID: PMC10747072 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15122744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2023] [Revised: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer is a significant health concern for men, emphasizing the need for effective treatment strategies. Dose-escalated external beam radiotherapy shows promise in improving outcomes but presents challenges due to radiation effects on nearby structures, such as the rectum. Innovative techniques, including rectal spacers, have emerged to mitigate these effects. This study comprehensively assessed tissue responses following the implantation of the Bioprotect biodegradable fillable balloon as a rectal spacer in a rat model. Evaluation occurred at multiple time points (4, 26, and 52 weeks) post-implantation. Results revealed localized tissue responses consistent with the expected reaction to biodegradable materials, characterized by mild to moderate fibrotic reactions and encapsulation, underscoring the safety and biocompatibility of the balloon. Importantly, no other adverse events occurred, and the animals remained healthy throughout the study. These findings support its potential clinical utility in radiotherapy treatments to enhance patient outcomes and minimize long-term implant-related complications, serving as a benchmark for future similar studies and offering valuable insights for researchers in the field. In conclusion, the findings from this study highlight the safety, biocompatibility, and potential clinical applicability of the Bioprotect biodegradable fillable balloon as a promising rectal spacer in mitigating radiation-induced complications during prostate cancer radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuval Ramot
- Department of Dermatology, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem 9112001, Israel;
- Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 9112001, Israel
| | - Tal Levin-Harrus
- Envigo CRS Israel Limited, Ness Ziona 7414001, Israel; (T.L.-H.); (A.E.); (M.S.); (N.E.)
| | - Adva Ezratty
- Envigo CRS Israel Limited, Ness Ziona 7414001, Israel; (T.L.-H.); (A.E.); (M.S.); (N.E.)
| | - Michal Steiner
- Envigo CRS Israel Limited, Ness Ziona 7414001, Israel; (T.L.-H.); (A.E.); (M.S.); (N.E.)
| | - Nati Ezov
- Envigo CRS Israel Limited, Ness Ziona 7414001, Israel; (T.L.-H.); (A.E.); (M.S.); (N.E.)
| | - Abraham J. Domb
- Institute for Drug Research, School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 9112001, Israel; (A.J.D.); (M.A.-H.)
| | - Muhammad Abdel-Haq
- Institute for Drug Research, School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 9112001, Israel; (A.J.D.); (M.A.-H.)
| | - Shaul Shohat
- BioProtect, Tzur Yigal 4486200, Israel; (S.S.); (L.A.); (L.A.)
| | - Liron Aperman
- BioProtect, Tzur Yigal 4486200, Israel; (S.S.); (L.A.); (L.A.)
| | - Lee Adler
- BioProtect, Tzur Yigal 4486200, Israel; (S.S.); (L.A.); (L.A.)
| | - Oleg Dolkart
- Assuta Ashdod University Hospital, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheba 8410501, Israel;
| | - Abraham Nyska
- Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6200515, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Arceo-Olaiz R, Smith EA, Stokes C, Eaton BR, Garcia-Roig M. Use of Perirectal Hyaluronic Acid Spacer Prior to Radiotherapy in a Pediatric Patient With Bladder Rhabdomyosarcoma: A Case Report. Urology 2023; 181:136-140. [PMID: 37453583 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.06.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Revised: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) treatment involves surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. A radioprotective space between the bladder/prostate and rectum reduces postradiation complications, as reported in adult patients. Describe pediatric preradiotherapy perirectal hyaluronic acid (HA) spacer injection for bladder/prostate RMS. We present a case of a 17-month-old male with bladder/prostate RMS. Before radiotherapy, an HA spacer was injected peri-rectally. Under general anesthesia, a transrectal ultrasound was positioned and 1mL of HA spacer was injected into the perirectal space. No complications were reported at 6-month follow-up. This is the first report of pre-radiation therapy spacer injection for pediatric bladder/prostate RMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ricardo Arceo-Olaiz
- Pediatric Urology Department, Emory University School of Medicine, Sandy Springs, GA; Pediatric Urology Department, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA
| | - Edwin A Smith
- Pediatric Urology Department, Emory University School of Medicine, Sandy Springs, GA; Pediatric Urology Department, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA
| | - Claire Stokes
- Hematology/Oncology Department, Emory University School of Medicine, Sandy Springs, GA; Hematology/Oncology Department, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA
| | - Bree R Eaton
- Radiation Oncology Department, Emory University School of Medicine, Sandy Springs, GA
| | - Michael Garcia-Roig
- Pediatric Urology Department, Emory University School of Medicine, Sandy Springs, GA; Pediatric Urology Department, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
A Novel Concept of Transperineal Focused Ultrasound Transducer for Prostate Cancer Local Deep Hyperthermia Treatments. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 15:cancers15010163. [PMID: 36612159 PMCID: PMC9818476 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15010163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Revised: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Design, embodiment, and experimental study of a novel concept of extracorporeal phased array ultrasound transducer for prostate cancer regional deep hyperthermia treatments using a transperineal acoustic window is presented. An optimized design of hyperthermia applicator was derived from a modelling software where acoustic and thermal fields were computed based on anatomical data. Performance tests have been experimentally conducted on gel phantoms and tissues, under 3T MRI guidance using PRFS thermometry. Feedback controlled hyperthermia (ΔT = 5 °C during 20min) was performed on two ex vivo lamb carcasses with prostate mimicking pelvic tissue, to demonstrate capability of spatio-temporal temperature control and to assess potential risks and side effects. Our optimization approach yielded a therapeutic ultrasound transducer consisting of 192 elements of variable shape and surface, pseudo randomly distributed on 6 columns, using a frequency of 700 kHz. Radius of curvature was 140 mm and active water circulation was included for cooling. The measured focusing capabilities covered a volume of 24 × 50 × 60 mm3. Acoustic coupling of excellent quality was achieved. No interference was detected between sonication and MR acquisitions. On ex vivo experiments the target temperature elevation of 5 °C was reached after 5 min and maintained during another 15 min with the predictive temperature controller showing 0.2 °C accuracy. No significant temperature rise was observed on skin and bonny structures. Reported results represent a promising step toward the implementation of transperineal ultrasound hyperthermia in a pilot study of reirradiation in prostate cancer patients.
Collapse
|
8
|
Riberdy V, Ruiz E, Hoekstra N, Struik G, Pignol JP. Comparison of visibility of iodinated hydrogel and gadolinium-modified hyaluronic acid spacer gels on computed tomography and onboard imaging. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2022; 21:48-53. [PMID: 35243031 PMCID: PMC8861832 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2022.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Revised: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 02/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose In accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI), accurate definition of the tumour bed is crucial to reduce the risk of local recurrence and the volume of healthy tissue irradiated. Recently, hydrogels have been proposed to improve visibility of the lumpectomy cavity for APBI. The aim of this study was to alter two commercially available hyaluronic acid (HA) gels, with gadopentenate dimeglumine (GD), a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agent. We hypothesize that after injection in the surgical cavity, the mixtures will be visible with computed tomography (CT) for improved treatment planning, cone-beam CT (CBCT) for improved patient setup and planar kilovoltage (kV) x-ray for real-time tracking during treatment. Materials and methods In this ex vivo study, GD was mixed with the two HA gels, and 1 mL of each mixture was injected into fatty and muscular tissue of a pork phantom. Visibility with CT, CBCT and planar x-ray imaging was assessed. Contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were measured and compared to commercially available iodinated polyethylene glycol (PEG). Results The gel mixtures showed increased visibility over HA gels without GD. When comparing CNR of the gel mixtures to that of iodinated PEG on CT, there was a 4-fold increase in muscle for both mixtures and a 1.6-fold to 3.6-fold increase in fat, depending on the HA gel. Gel mixtures showed better visibility with planar kV imaging over iodinated PEG. Conclusion Addition of GD to HA gels increases visibility with CT, CBCT and planar x-ray imaging, indicating potential for improved delineation and positioning in APBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vlora Riberdy
- Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
- Corresponding author at: Department of Medical Physics, 5820 University Ave., Halifax, NS B3H 1V7, Canada.
| | - Ethan Ruiz
- Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Nienke Hoekstra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gerson Struik
- Department of Surgery, Franciscus Gasthuis and Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jean-Philippe Pignol
- Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Barros S, Roseira J, Caldeira P, Vaz AM, Guerreiro H, Codon O. Rectal Perforation by a Balloon Spacer: A Rare Cause of Rectal Perforation Addressed Endoscopically. GE-PORTUGUESE JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY 2021; 28:416-419. [PMID: 34901449 DOI: 10.1159/000511647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Accepted: 09/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the second most frequent cancer in men worldwide. Dose escalation is currently the standard of care for the treatment of prostate cancer with radiation therapy. However, the rectum tends to be the dose-limiting structure when treating prostate cancer, given its proximity. The injection of biodegradable spacers between the prostate and the rectum may optimize radiotherapy treatment delivery for patients with localized disease. Nevertheless, although the overall complication rate of spacers is marginal, the benefits of spacer technologies need to be evaluated against the complication risks such as rectum perforation/necrosis. We report a case of a 59-year-old man with a diagnosis of prostate adenocarcinoma for whom hormonal treatment followed by intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) was proposed. A biodegradable and expandable balloon (BioProtect®) was injected into the perirectal space without detectable immediate complications. One month later, the patient presented with a 3-day persistent rectal bleeding. The investigation confirmed a rectal perforation by the balloon spacer system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sónia Barros
- Gastroenterology Department, Algarve University Medical Center, Faro, Portugal
| | - Joana Roseira
- Gastroenterology Department, Algarve University Medical Center, Faro, Portugal
| | - Paulo Caldeira
- Gastroenterology Department, Algarve University Medical Center, Faro, Portugal
| | - Ana Margarida Vaz
- Gastroenterology Department, Algarve University Medical Center, Faro, Portugal
| | - Horácio Guerreiro
- Gastroenterology Department, Algarve University Medical Center, Faro, Portugal
| | - Oscar Codon
- Radiation Oncology Department, Algarve Radio-Oncology Clinic, Faro, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Payne HA, Pinkawa M, Peedell C, Bhattacharyya SK, Woodward E, Miller LE. SpaceOAR hydrogel spacer injection prior to stereotactic body radiation therapy for men with localized prostate cancer: A systematic review. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021; 100:e28111. [PMID: 34889268 PMCID: PMC8663810 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000028111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Revised: 10/14/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conventionally fractionated radiotherapy is a common treatment for men with localized prostate cancer. A growing consensus suggests that stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is similarly effective but less costly and more convenient for patients. The SpaceOAR hydrogel rectal spacer placed between the prostate and rectum reduces radiation-induced rectal injury in patients receiving conventionally fractionated radiotherapy, but spacer efficacy with SBRT is unclear. The purpose of this research was to assess the clinical utility of the hydrogel rectal spacer in men receiving SBRT for prostate cancer. METHODS We performed systematic searches of Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for studies in men who received the SpaceOAR hydrogel spacer prior to SBRT (≥5.0 Gy fractions) for treatment of localized prostate center. Rectal irradiation results were compared to controls without spacer implant; all other outcomes were reported descriptively owing to lack of comparative data incuding perirectal separation distance, rectal irradiation on a dosimetric curve, gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity, and freedom from biochemical failure. GI toxicity was reported as the risk of a grade 2 or 3+ bowel complication in early (≤3 months) and late (>3 months) follow-up. RESULTS In 11 studies with 780 patients, SBRT protocols ranged from 7 to 10 Gy per fraction with total dose ranging from 19 to 45 Gy. Perirectal distance achieved with the rectal spacer ranged from 9.6 to 14.5 mm (median 10.8 mm). Compared to controls receiving no spacer, SpaceOAR placement reduced the radiation delivered to the rectum by 29% to 56% across a dosimetric profile curve. In early follow-up, grade 2 GI complications were reported in 7.0% of patients and no early grade 3+ GI complications were reported. In late follow-up, the corresponding rates were 2.3% for grade 2 and 0.3% for grade 3 GI toxicity. Over 16 months median follow-up, freedom from biochemical failure ranged from 96.4% to 100% (pooled mean 97.4%). CONCLUSIONS SpaceOAR hydrogel spacer placed between the prostate and rectum prior to SBRT is a promising preventative strategy that increases the distance between the prostate and rectum, reduces rectal radiation exposure, and may lower the risk of clinically important GI complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather A. Payne
- Oncology Department, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Michael Pinkawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MediClin Robert Janker Klinik, Bonn, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Larry E. Miller
- Department of Biostatistics, Miller Scientific, Johnson City, TN
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Latorzeff I, Bruguière E, Bogart E, Le Deley MC, Lartigau E, Marre D, Pasquier D. Use of a Biodegradable, Contrast-Filled Rectal Spacer Balloon in Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients: Dosimetric Gains in the BioPro-RCMI-1505 Study. Front Oncol 2021; 11:701998. [PMID: 34513681 PMCID: PMC8427159 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.701998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background/purpose Dose-escalated external beam radiotherapy (RT) is effective in the control of prostate cancer but is associated with a greater incidence of rectal adverse events. We assessed the dosimetric gain and safety profile associated with implantation of a new biodegradable rectal spacer balloon. Materials/methods Patients scheduled for image-guided, intensity-modulated RT for intermediate-risk prostate cancer were prospectively included in the French multicenter BioPro-RCMI-1505 study (NCT02478112). We evaluated the dosimetric gain, implantation feasibility, adverse events (AEs), and prostate-cancer-specific quality of life associated with use of the balloon spacer. Results After a scheduled review of the initial recruitment target of 50 patients by the study's independent data monitoring committee (IDMC), a total of 24 patients (including 22 with dosimetry data) were included by a single center between November 2016 and May 2018. The interventional radiologist who implanted the balloons considered that 86% of the procedures were easy. 20 of the 24 patients (83.3%) received IMRT and 4 (16.7%) received volumetric modulated arc therapy (78-80 Gy delivered in 39 fractions). The dosimetric gains associated with spacer implantation were highly significant (p<0.001) for most variables. For the rectum, the median (range) relative gain ranged from 15.4% (-9.2-47.5) for D20cc to 91.4% (36.8-100.0) for V70 Gy (%). 15 patients (62%) experienced an acute grade 1 AE, 8 (33%) experienced a late grade 1 AE, 1 (4.2%) experienced an acute grade 2 AE, and 3 experienced a late grade 2 AE. No grade 3 AEs were reported. Quality of life was good at baseline (except for sexual activity) and did not markedly worsen during RT and up to 24 months afterwards. Conclusion The use of a biodegradable rectal spacer balloon is safe, effective and associated with dosimetric gains in modern RT for intermediate-risk prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Igor Latorzeff
- Department of Radiotherapy, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France
| | - Eric Bruguière
- Department of Imaging, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France
| | - Emilie Bogart
- Methodology and Biostatistics Unit, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | | | - Eric Lartigau
- Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France.,CRIStAL UMR CNRS 9189, Lille University, Lille, France
| | - Delphine Marre
- Department of Physics, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France
| | - David Pasquier
- Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France.,CRIStAL UMR CNRS 9189, Lille University, Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Omi Y, Yasui K, Shimomura A, Muramatsu R, Iwata H, Ogino H, Furukawa A, Hayashi N. Dosimetric effects of quality assurance-related setup errors in passive proton therapy for prostate cancer with and without a hydrogel spacer. Radiol Phys Technol 2021; 14:328-335. [PMID: 34313911 DOI: 10.1007/s12194-021-00632-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2020] [Revised: 07/20/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of quality assurance (QA)-related setup errors in passive proton therapy for prostate cancer with and without a hydrogel spacer. We used 20 typical computed tomography (CT) images of prostate cancer: 10 patients with and 10 patients without spacers. The following 12 model errors were assumed: output error ± 2%, range error ± 1 mm, setup error ± 1 mm for three directions, and multileaf collimator (MLC) position error ± 1 mm. We created verification plans with model errors and compared the prostate-rectal (PR) distance and dose indices with and without the spacer. The mean PR distance at the isocenter was 1.1 ± 1.3 mm without the spacer and 12.9 ± 2.9 mm with the spacer (P < 0.001). The mean rectum V53.5 GyE, V50 GyE, and V34.5 GyE in the original plan were 2.3%, 4.1%, and 12.1% without the spacer and 0.1%, 0.4%, and 3.3% with the spacer (P = 0.0011, < 0.001, and < 0.001). The effects of the range and lateral setup errors were small; however, the effects of the vertical/long setup and MLC error were significant in the cases without the spacer. The means of the maximum absolute change from original plans across all scenarios in the rectum V53.5 GyE, V50 GyE, and V34.5 GyE were 1.3%, 1.5%, and 2.3% without the spacer, and 0.2%, 0.4%, and 1.3% with the spacer (P < 0.001, < 0.001, and = 0.0019). This study indicated that spacer injections were also effective in reducing the change in the rectal dose due to setup errors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuta Omi
- Anjo Kosei Hospital, 28 Higashi-Hirokute, Anjo-cho, Anjo, Aichi, 446-8602, Japan
| | - Keisuke Yasui
- Faculty of Radiological Technology, School of Health Sciences, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.
| | - Akira Shimomura
- Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City West Medical Center, 1-1-1, Hirate-cho, Kita-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 462-8508, Japan
| | - Rie Muramatsu
- Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City West Medical Center, 1-1-1, Hirate-cho, Kita-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 462-8508, Japan
| | - Hiromitsu Iwata
- Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City West Medical Center, 1-1-1, Hirate-cho, Kita-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 462-8508, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Ogino
- Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City West Medical Center, 1-1-1, Hirate-cho, Kita-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 462-8508, Japan
| | - Akari Furukawa
- Faculty of Radiological Technology, School of Health Sciences, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan
| | - Naoki Hayashi
- Faculty of Radiological Technology, School of Health Sciences, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Meyer AR, Dharmaraj D, Harb R, Pavlovich CP, Allaf ME, Gorin MA. Perirectal hydrogel spacer placement prior to prostate radiation therapy using a probe-mounted needle guide. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2021; 29:102-105. [PMID: 34195392 PMCID: PMC8234349 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2021] [Revised: 05/03/2021] [Accepted: 05/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Perirectal spacer placement minimizes the risk of bowel toxicity from prostate radiation therapy. We show that a novel probe-mounted needle guide can be safely used for perirectal spacer insertion. The main advantage of this device is that it ensures needle visualization throughout the procedure.
In this report we describe our successful adoption of a single-use, probe-mounted, needle guide for perirectal hydrogel spacer placement prior to radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Use of this device eliminates the need for a mechanical stepper unit and facilitates perirectal hydrogel placement by ensuring alignment of the injection needle with the ultrasound probe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexa R Meyer
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins, University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Divya Dharmaraj
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins, University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Rana Harb
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins, University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Christian P Pavlovich
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins, University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Mohamad E Allaf
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins, University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Michael A Gorin
- Urology Associates and UPMC Western Maryland, Cumberland, MD, USA.,Deparmtnet of Urology, University of Pittsburg School of Medicine, Pittsburg, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Fagundes M, Rodrigues MA, Olszewski S, Khan F, McKenzie C, Gutierrez A, Chuong M, Mehta M. Expanding the Utilization of Rectal Spacer Hydrogel for Larger Prostate Glands (>80 cc): Feasibility and Dosimetric Outcomes. Adv Radiat Oncol 2021; 6:100651. [PMID: 34195489 PMCID: PMC8233470 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2020] [Revised: 11/26/2020] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The Hydrogel Spacer Prospective Randomized Pivotal Trial achieved mean rectoprostatic spacing of 12.6 mm resulting in lowering of rectal V70 from 12.4% (without spacer) to 3.3% (with spacer) in patients with glands up to 80 cm3. The value of this approach in patients with larger glands is inadequately established. This study assesses the feasibility and dosimetric outcomes of perirectal spacing in patients with prostate cancer with larger glands (>80 cm3). Methods and Materials Between January 2017 and December 2019, 33 patients with prostate glands >80 cm3 (mean 108.1 cm3; range, 81.1-186.6 cm3) were treated, 15 with glands >80 to 100 cm3 and 18 >100 cm3. Median follow-up was 10 months (range, 3-26). The median international prostate symptom score was 9 (range, 1-18). Hydrogel was placed under local anesthesia in all cases. Treatment modality included intensity modulated radiation therapy in 15 and proton therapy (PT) in 18 patients. Treatment targeted the prostate plus seminal vesicles in 21 patients and 12 also had elective nodal irradiation. Conventional fractionation (CF) to 78 Gy in 39 fractions was used in 16 and moderate hypofractionation (HF) to 70 Gy in 28 fractions in 17 patients. Results In the CF group, mean rectum (r) V75, 70, 60, 50 was 0.87%, 2.25%, 5.61%, and 10.5%, respectively. For glands >80 to 100 cm3 and >100 cm3, rV70 was 2.55% and 2%, respectively. In HF patients, mean rV65, 63, 60, and 50 was 1.67%, 2.3%, 3.4%, and 8.6%. For glands >80 to 100 cm3 and >100 cm3, rV63 was 2% and 2.56%, respectively. Overall, the mean midgland rectoprostatic hydrogel separation was 9.3 mm (range, 4.7-19.4 mm). All patients tolerated treatment well; no acute grade 2 or higher adverse gastrointestinal events were observed. Conclusions Hydrogel placement is feasible in prostate glands larger than 80 cm3 with favorable dosimetric outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcio Fagundes
- Radiation Oncology Department, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, Florida
| | | | - Steve Olszewski
- Radiation Oncology Department, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, Florida
| | - Fazal Khan
- Radiation Oncology Department, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, Florida
| | - Craig McKenzie
- Radiation Oncology Department, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, Florida
| | - Alonso Gutierrez
- Radiation Oncology Department, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, Florida
| | - Michael Chuong
- Radiation Oncology Department, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, Florida
| | - Minesh Mehta
- Radiation Oncology Department, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Vaggers S, Rai BP, Chedgy ECP, de la Taille A, Somani BK. Polyethylene glycol-based hydrogel rectal spacers for prostate brachytherapy: a systematic review with a focus on technique. World J Urol 2021; 39:1769-1780. [PMID: 32840655 PMCID: PMC8217059 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03414-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 08/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Radiation dose to the rectum in prostate brachytherapy (PBT) can be reduced by the use of polyethylene glycol (PEG) hydrogel spacers. This reduces the rate of rectal toxicity and allows dose escalation to the prostate. Our objectives were to provide an overview of technique for injection of a PEG hydrogel spacer, reduction in rectal dosimetry, gastrointestinal toxicity and potential complications. METHODS We systematically reviewed the role of PEG hydrogel spacers in PBT using the Cochrane and PRISMA methodology for all English-language articles from January 2013 to December 2019. Data was extracted for type of radiotherapy, number of patients, type of PEG-hydrogel used, mean prostate-rectum separation, rectal dosimetry, acute and late GI toxicity, procedure-related complications and the technique used for hydrogel insertion. RESULTS Nine studies (671 patients and 537 controls) met our inclusion criteria. Of these 4 used DuraSeal® and 5 used SpaceOAR®. The rectal spacing achieved varied between 7.7-16 mm. Failure of hydrogel insertion was seen only in 12 patients, mostly related to failure of hydrodissection in patients undergoing salvage PBT. Where reported, the rectal D2 cc was reduced by between 21.6 and 52.6% and the median rectal V75% cc was reduced by between 91.8-100%. Acute GI complications were mostly limited to grade 1 or 2 toxicity (n = 153, 33.7%) with low levels of grade 3 or 4 toxicity (n = 1, 0.22%). Procedure-related complications were limited to tenesmus (0.14%), rectal discomfort (1.19%), and bacterial prostatitis (0.44%). CONCLUSIONS PEG hydrogel spacers are safe to insert. Gel insertion is easy, fast and has a low rate of failure. These studies convincingly demonstrate a significant reduction in rectal dosimetry. Although the results of spacers in reducing rectal toxicity is promising, these need to be confirmed in prospective randomised trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. Vaggers
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
| | | | | | - A. de la Taille
- Department of Urology, Robotic and Miniinvasive Surgery, Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de Paris, 94000 Créteil, France
| | - B. K. Somani
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kim SH, Ding K, Rao A, He J, Bhutani MS, Herman JM, Narang A, Shin EJ. EUS-guided hydrogel microparticle injection in a cadaveric model. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2021; 22:83-91. [PMID: 34028956 PMCID: PMC8200447 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Revised: 03/31/2021] [Accepted: 04/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS A potential method to reduce gastrointestinal toxicity during radiation therapy in pancreatic head cancer is to create a physical space between the head of the pancreas (HOP) and the duodenum. To date, there have been early reports on the feasibility of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided hydrogel injection into the interface between the HOP and the duodenum to increase the peri-pancreatic space for radiotherapy. We aimed to evaluate the technical feasibility of EUS-guided hydrogel injection for the creation of space at the peri-pancreatic interface in a cadaveric model. METHODS Baseline abdominal computerized tomography (CT) was performed on three unfixed cadaveric specimens. The hydrogel was injected transduodenally into the interface between the HOP and duodenum using linear-array EUS and a 19G needle for fine needle aspiration (FNA). This procedure was repeated along the length of the HOP. CT imaging and gross dissection were performed after the procedure to confirm the localization of the hydrogel and to measure the distance between the HOP and the duodenum. RESULTS All cadavers underwent successful EUS-guided injection of the hydrogel. Cadavers 1, 2, and 3 were injected with 9.5, 27, and 10 cc of hydrogel, respectively; along the HOP, the formation of the peri-pancreatic space was a maximum size of 11.77, 13.20, and 12.89 mm, respectively. The hydrogel injections were clearly visualized as hyperechoic bullae during EUS and on post-procedure CT images without any artifacts in all cases. CONCLUSIONS We demonstrated that EUS-guided delivery of hydrogel is feasible, and that it increases the peri-pancreatic space in a cadaveric model. The polyethylene glycol (PEG) hydrogel was clearly visible on EUS and CT, without significant artifacts. This may lead to new treatment approaches for pancreatic carcinomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seong-Hun Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju-si, Jeollabuk-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Kai Ding
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Avani Rao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Manoop S Bhutani
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Joseph M Herman
- Radiation Oncology, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Lake Success, NY, USA
| | - Amol Narang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Eun Ji Shin
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Armstrong N, Bahl A, Pinkawa M, Ryder S, Ahmadu C, Ross J, Bhattacharyya S, Woodward E, Battaglia S, Binns J, Payne H. SpaceOAR Hydrogel Spacer for Reducing Radiation Toxicity During Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer. A Systematic Review. Urology 2021; 156:e74-e85. [PMID: 34029607 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Revised: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 05/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the association between SpaceOAR and radiation dosing, toxicity and quality-of-life vs no spacer across all radiotherapy modalities for prostate cancer. METHODS A systematic search of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, and Embase was performed from database inception through May 2020. Two reviewers independently screened titles/abstracts and full papers. Data extraction was performed, and quality assessed by 1 reviewer and checked by a second, using a third reviewer as required. The synthesis was narrative. RESULTS 19 studies (3,622 patients) were included (only 1 randomized controlled trial, in image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT), 18 comparatives non-randomized controlled trials in external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT), brachytherapy, and combinations thereof). No hypofractionation studies were found. Regardless of radiotherapy type, SpaceOAR significantly reduced rectal radiation dose (eg, V40 average difference -6.1% in high dose-rate brachytherapy plus IG-IMRT to -9.1% in IG-IMRT) and reduced gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicities (eg, late gastrointestinal toxicity 1% vs 6% (P = .01), late genitourinary toxicity of 15% vs 32% (P < .001) in stereotactic body radiotherapy). Improvements were observed in most Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite quality-of-life domains (eg, bowel function score decrease at 3 and 6 months: Average change of zero vs -6.25 and -3.57 respectively in low dose-rate brachytherapy plus EBRT). CONCLUSION The randomized controlled trial in IG-IMRT demonstrated that SpaceOAR reduces rectal radiation dose and late gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicities, with urinary, bowel, and sexual quality-of-life improvement. These advantages were verified in observational studies in various radiotherapy types. Further research is required in hypofractionation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nigel Armstrong
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, Escrick, YO, United Kingdom.
| | - Amit Bahl
- University Hospitals Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Pinkawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MediClin Robert Janker Klinik, Bonn, Germany
| | - Steve Ryder
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, Escrick, YO, United Kingdom
| | | | - Janine Ross
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, Escrick, YO, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Jean Binns
- Boston Scientific Corporation, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Babar M, Katz A, Ciatto M. Dosimetric and clinical outcomes of SpaceOAR in men undergoing external beam radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: A systematic review. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2021; 65:384-397. [PMID: 33855816 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2020] [Revised: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 03/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
SpaceOAR, an absorbable polyethylene glycol hydrogel, increases the space between the prostate and rectum to reduce the radiation received by the rectum during prostate cancer radiation therapy. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate controlled studies on the dosimetric and clinical outcomes of SpaceOAR in men undergoing external beam radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer. Eight studies were included in the review. All of the studies showed SpaceOAR to reduce the radiation dose volume to the rectum over numerous dosimetry levels. Of the four studies that assessed toxicity, one reported SpaceOAR to significantly decrease acute Grade 1 diarrhoea and two reported SpaceOAR to significantly decrease late Grade 1 and Grade ≥2 rectal toxicities. Two studies assessed cumulative incidence of toxicity at 3 years in which one reported SpaceOAR to significantly decrease urinary incontinence and Grade ≥1 and Grade ≥2 rectal toxicities, and the other reported SpaceOAR to significantly decrease Grade 1 diarrhoea and Grade 2 proctitis. Moreover, one study reported that fewer SpaceOAR patients experienced 10-point declines in bowel quality of life at 3 years, but another study reported no significant difference in 10-point declines in bowel quality of life between the SpaceOAR and control groups at 5 years. With the current research available, SpaceOAR may be beneficial to those who did not meet the standard rectal dose-volume criteria, have higher risk factors of developing rectal toxicities post-radiation, or wish to decrease the length and costs of radiotherapy by increasing the dose of radiation per fraction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alan Katz
- St. Francis Hospital, Roslyn, NY, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Achard V, Ris F, Rouzaud M, Puppa G, Buchs NC, De Perrot T, Koessler T, Picardi C, Zilli T. Sexual organ-sparing with hydrogel spacer injections for rectal cancer radiotherapy: a feasibility pilot study. Br J Radiol 2021; 94:20200931. [PMID: 33481641 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20200931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this pilot study was to investigate in two rectal cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy (nCRT) the implant feasibility and dosimetric benefit in sexual organ-sparing of an injectable, absorbable, radiopaque hydrogel spacer. METHODS Two rectal cancer patients (one male and one female) underwent hydrogel implant between rectum and vagina/prostate before nCRT and curative surgery. A CT scan was performed before and after injection and a comparative dosimetric study was performed testing a standard (45/50 Gy) and a dose escalated (46/55.2 Gy) schedule. RESULTS In both patients, the spacer implant in the recto-prostatic or recto-vaginal space was feasible and well tolerated. For the male, the dosimetric benefit with spacer was minimal for sexual organs. For the female however, doses delivered to the vagina were significantly reduced with spacer with a mean reduction of more than 5 Gy for both regimens. CONCLUSIONS For organ preservation protocols and selected sexually active female patients, use of hydrogel spacers can be considered to spare sexual organs from the high radiotherapy dose levels. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE For females with advanced rectal tumor, a spacer implant between the rectum and the vagina before nCRT is feasible and reduces doses delivered to the vagina.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vérane Achard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Frederic Ris
- Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland.,Department of Visceral Surgery, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Michel Rouzaud
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Giacomo Puppa
- Department of Pathology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas C Buchs
- Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland.,Department of Visceral Surgery, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Thomas De Perrot
- Department of Radiology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Thibaud Koessler
- Department of Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Cristina Picardi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.,Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
The use of hyaluronic acid hydrogel as a tumour bed marker in breast-conserving therapy. Radiother Oncol 2020; 152:8-13. [PMID: 32738260 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.07.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2019] [Revised: 07/12/2020] [Accepted: 07/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate usefulness of hyaluronic acid (HA) hydrogel as a tumour bed marker in breast conserving therapy (BCT). To analyze inter- (Inter-OV) and intraobserver (Intra-OV) variability of contouring boost target volume (CTVboost) in external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS Thirty-two patients in the HA group and 30 patients in the control group with an early stage breast cancer were included in the study. During the surgery 1-3 ml of HA hydrogel was injected into breast to mark the tumour bed for every patient in the HA group. Moreover, surgical clips were placed underneath the lumpectomy cavity. Patients in the control group were marked only by metal markers. Three radiation oncologists delineated CTVboost twice for every patient. Three parameters were calculated to quantify contouring variability: coefficient of variation for volumes (COVV), center of mass displacement (CoMd) and conformity index (CI). RESULTS There were no significant differences between mean values of COVV for HA and control group, neither for Intra-OV (0.14 vs 0.13) nor Inter-OV (0.19 vs 0.18) calculations. The mean CoMd were 6.1 mm and 9.1 mm for Inter-OV calculations and 3.9 mm and 6.4 mm for Intra-OV in the HA and the control group respectively. The mean CI for Intra-OV improved from 0.61 to 0.65 and from 0.47 to 0.56 for Inter-OV in the control and HA group respectively. CONCLUSION HA hydrogel used as a tumour bed marker improves tumour bed visibility and reduces inter- and intraobserver variability of EBRT boost target volume delineations.
Collapse
|
21
|
Cuccia F, Mazzola R, Nicosia L, Figlia V, Giaj-Levra N, Ricchetti F, Rigo M, Vitale C, Mantoan B, De Simone A, Sicignano G, Ruggieri R, Cavalleri S, Alongi F. Impact of hydrogel peri-rectal spacer insertion on prostate gland intra-fraction motion during 1.5 T MR-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:178. [PMID: 32698843 PMCID: PMC7376654 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01622-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The assessment of organ motion is a crucial feature for prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Rectal spacer may represent a helpful device in order to outdistance rectal wall from clinical target, but its impact on organ motion is still a matter of debate. MRI-Linac is a new frontier in radiation oncology as it allows a superior visualization of the real-time anatomy of the patient and the current highest level of adaptive radiotherapy. Methods We present data regarding a total of 100 fractions in 20 patients who underwent MRI-guided prostate SBRT for low-to-intermediate risk prostate cancer with or without spacer. Translational and rotational shifts were computed on the pre- and post-treatment MRI acquisitions referring to the delivery position for antero-posterior, latero-lateral and cranio-caudal direction, and assessed using the Mann-Whitney U-Test. Results All patients were treated with a five sessions schedule (35 Gy/5fx) using MRI-Linac for a median fraction treatment time of 50 min (range, 46–65). In the entire study sample, median rotational displacement was 0.1° in cranio-caudal, − 0.002° in latero-lateral and 0.01° in antero-posterior direction; median translational shift was 0.11 mm in cranio-caudal, − 0.24 mm in latero-lateral and − 0.22 mm in antero-posterior. A significant difference between spacer and no-spacer patients in terms of rotational shifts in the antero-posterior direction (p = 0.033) was observed; also for translational shifts a positive trend was detected in antero-posterior direction (p = 0.07), although with no statistical significance. We observed statistically significant differences in the pre-treatment planning phase in favor of the spacer cohort for several rectum dose constraints: rectum V32Gy < 5% (p = 0.001), V28 Gy < 10% (p = 0.001) and V18Gy < 35% (p = 0.039). Also for bladder V35 Gy < 1 cc, the use of spacer provided a dosimetric advantage compared to the no-spacer subpopulation (p = 0.04). Furthermore, PTV V33.2Gy > 95% was higher in the spacer cohort compared to the no-spacer one (p = 0.036). Conclusion In our experience, the application of rectal hydrogel spacer for prostate SBRT resulted in a significant impact on rotational antero-posterior shifts contributing to limit prostate intra-fraction motion. Further studies with larger sample size and longer follow-up are required to confirm this ideally favorable effect and to assess any potential impact on clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Cuccia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Deparment, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy.
| | - Rosario Mazzola
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Deparment, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Luca Nicosia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Deparment, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Vanessa Figlia
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Deparment, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Niccolò Giaj-Levra
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Deparment, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Ricchetti
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Deparment, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Michele Rigo
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Deparment, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Claudio Vitale
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Deparment, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Beatrice Mantoan
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Deparment, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Antonio De Simone
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Deparment, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Gianluisa Sicignano
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Deparment, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Ruggero Ruggieri
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Deparment, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Stefano Cavalleri
- Urology Division, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Filippo Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Deparment, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy.,University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Overview of patient preparation strategies to manage internal organ motion during radiotherapy in the pelvis. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE 2020. [DOI: 10.1017/s1460396919000530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
AbstractIntroduction:Pelvic internal organs change in volume and position during radiotherapy. This may compromise the efficacy of treatment or worsen its toxicity. There may be limitations to fully correcting these changes using online image guidance; therefore, effective and consistent patient preparation and positioning remain important. This review aims to provide an overview of the extent of pelvic organ motion and strategies to manage this motion.Methods and Materials:Given the breadth of this topic, a systematic review was not undertaken. Instead, existing systematic reviews and individual high-quality studies addressing strategies to manage pelvic organ motion have been discussed. Suggested levels of evidence and grades of recommendation for each strategy have been applied.Results:Various strategies to manage rectal changes have been investigated including diet and laxatives, enemas and rectal emptying tubes and rectal displacement with endorectal balloons (ERBs) and rectal spacers. Bladder-filling protocols and bladder ultrasound have been used to try to standardise bladder volume. Positioning the patient supine, using a full bladder and positioning prone with or without a belly board, has been examined in an attempt to reduce the volume of irradiated small bowel. Some randomised trials have been performed, with evidence to support the use of ERBs, rectal spacers, bladder-filling protocols and the supine over prone position in prostate radiotherapy. However, there was a lack of consistent high-quality evidence that would be applicable to different disease sites within the pelvis. Many studies included small numbers of patients were non-randomised, used less conformal radiotherapy techniques or did not report clinical outcomes such as toxicity.Conclusions:There is uncertainty as to the clinical benefit of many of the commonly adopted interventions to minimise pelvic organ motion. Given this and the limitations in online image guidance compensation, further investigation of adaptive radiotherapy strategies is required.
Collapse
|
23
|
Miller LE, Efstathiou JA, Bhattacharyya SK, Payne HA, Woodward E, Pinkawa M. Association of the Placement of a Perirectal Hydrogel Spacer With the Clinical Outcomes of Men Receiving Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3:e208221. [PMID: 32585020 PMCID: PMC7301230 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.8221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2020] [Accepted: 04/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Importance Perirectal spacers are intended to lower the risk of rectal toxic effects associated with prostate radiotherapy. A quantitative synthesis of typical clinical results with specific perirectal spacers is limited. Objective To evaluate the association between perirectal hydrogel spacer placement and clinical outcomes of men receiving radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Data Sources A systematic search was performed of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, and Embase for articles published through September 2019. Study Selection Studies comparing men who received a hydrogel spacer vs men who did not receive a spacer (controls) prior to prostate radiotherapy. Data Extraction and Synthesis Via random-effects meta-analysis, group comparisons were reported using the weighted mean difference for continuous measures and the risk ratio for binary measures. Main Outcomes and Measures Procedural results, the percentage volume of rectum receiving at least 70 Gy radiation (v70), early (≤3 months) and late (>3 months) rectal toxic effects, and early and late changes in bowel-related quality of life on the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (minimal clinically important difference, 4 points). Results The review included 7 studies (1 randomized clinical trial and 6 cohort studies) involving 1011 men (486 who received a hydrogel spacer and 525 controls), with a median duration of patient follow-up of 26 months (range, 3-63 months). The success rate of hydrogel spacer placement was 97.0% (95% CI, 94.4%-98.8% [5 studies]), and the weighted mean perirectal separation distance was 11.2 mm (95% CI, 10.1-12.3 mm [5 studies]). Procedural complications were mild and transient, occurring in 0% to 10% of patients within the studies. The hydrogel spacer group received 66% less v70 rectal irradiation compared with controls (3.5% vs 10.4%; mean difference, -6.5%; 95% CI, -10.5% to -2.5%; P = .001 [6 studies]). The risk of grade 2 or higher rectal toxic effects was comparable between groups in early follow-up (4.5% in hydrogel spacer group vs 4.1% in control group; risk ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.52-1.28; P = .38 [6 studies]) but was 77% lower in the hydrogel spacer group in late follow-up (1.5% vs 5.7%; risk ratio, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.06-0.99; P = .05 [4 studies]). Changes in bowel-related quality of life were comparable between groups in early follow-up (mean difference, 0.2; 95% CI, -3.1 to 3.4; P = .92 [2 studies]) but were greater in the hydrogel spacer group in late follow-up (mean difference, 5.4; 95% CI, 2.8-8.0; P < .001 [2 studies]). Conclusions and Relevance For men receiving prostate radiotherapy, injection of a hydrogel spacer was safe, provided prostate-rectum separation sufficient to reduce v70 rectal irradiation, and was associated with fewer rectal toxic effects and higher bowel-related quality of life in late follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jason A. Efstathiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | | | - Heather A. Payne
- Oncology Department, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Emily Woodward
- Health Economics and Market Access, Boston Scientific AG, Ecublens, Switzerland
| | - Michael Pinkawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MediClin Robert Janker Klinik, Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Paetkau O, Gagne IM, Alexander A. SpaceOAR© hydrogel rectal dose reduction prediction model: a decision support tool. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2020; 21:15-25. [PMID: 32250042 PMCID: PMC7324696 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2019] [Revised: 02/10/2020] [Accepted: 03/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer external beam radiation therapy can result in toxicity due to organ at risk (OAR) dose, potentially impairing quality of life. A polyethylene glycol-based spacer, SpaceOAR© hydrogel (SOH), implanted between prostate gland and rectum may significantly reduce dose received by the rectum and hence risk of rectal toxicity. SOH implant is not equally effective in all patients. Determining patients in which the implant will offer most benefit, in terms of rectal dose reduction, allows for effective management of SOH resources. Several factors have been shown to be correlated with reduction in rectal dose including distance between rectum and planning treatment volume (PTV), volume of rectum in the PTV, and change in rectum volume pre- to post-SOH. Several of these factors along with other pre-SOH CT metrics were able to predict reduction in rectal dose associated with SOH implant. Rectal V55Gy metric, was selected as the dose level of interest in the context of 60 Gy in 20 fraction treatment plans. Models were produced to predict change in RV55Gy and pre-SOH hydrogel RV55Gy. These models offered R-squared between 0.81 and 0.88 with statistical significance in each model. Applying an ω 1 = 3% lower limit of pre-SOH RV55 Gy and an ω 2 = 3.5% lower limit on change in RV55 Gy, retained 60% of patients experiencing the largest rectal dose reduction from the hydrogel. This may offer a clinically useful tool in deciding which patients should receive SOH implant given limited resources. Predictive models, nomograms, and a workflow diagram were produced for clinical management of SOH implant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Owen Paetkau
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | - Isabelle M Gagne
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.,Department of Medical Physics, BC Cancer - Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | - Abraham Alexander
- Department of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer - Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.,Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Stereotactic beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer: is less, more? Lancet Oncol 2019; 20:1471-1472. [DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30652-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2019] [Accepted: 09/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
26
|
Afkhami Ardekani M, Ghaffari H. Optimization of prostate brachytherapy techniques with polyethylene glycol-based hydrogel spacers: A systematic review. Brachytherapy 2019; 19:13-23. [PMID: 31542390 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2019.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2019] [Revised: 08/01/2019] [Accepted: 08/21/2019] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The objective of this overview was to critically evaluate the effect of polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based hydrogel spacers during prostate brachytherapy with regard to dosimetric and clinical benefits, as well as procedure-related toxicity. METHODS AND MATERIALS A systematic search in the PubMed database was performed. RESULTS A total of 12 studies, involving 615 patients with PEG hydrogel injection, were included. Overall, patients well tolerated the implantation of PEG hydrogel spacers with an excellent safety profile. However, although there were some procedure-related complications, rates of these complications were very rare. Toxicities related to the spacer were limited to Grade 1 rectal discomfort and pain (9/615 patients), Grade 2 rectal ulceration (1 in 615 patients), perineal abscess (1 in 615 patients), and bacterial prostatitis (2/615 patients) according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 grading scheme. The application of PEG hydrogel spacers significantly reduced radiation doses to the rectum during prostate brachytherapy in the different setting. Although there was no prospective randomized clinical trial, retrospective studies showed that reducing rectal doses by the implantation of PEG hydrogel may result in an improvement in rectal toxicity. CONCLUSIONS The insertion of hydrogel spacers is safe, resulting in a significant decrease in rectal doses. This may lead to a reduction in rectal or gastrointestinal toxicity. Prospective randomized clinical trials are warranted to confirm the clinical impact of rectal dosimetric improvements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahdieh Afkhami Ardekani
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Para-Medicine, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar-Abbas, Iran
| | - Hamed Ghaffari
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Autologous fat as a rectal–prostate spacer for prostate brachytherapy: Results at 6 months. Brachytherapy 2019; 18:462-469. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2019.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2018] [Revised: 04/03/2019] [Accepted: 04/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
28
|
Decision Support Systems in Prostate Cancer Treatment: An Overview. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2019; 2019:4961768. [PMID: 31281840 PMCID: PMC6590598 DOI: 10.1155/2019/4961768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2018] [Revised: 04/02/2019] [Accepted: 05/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Background A multifactorial decision support system (mDSS) is a tool designed to improve the clinical decision-making process, while using clinical inputs for an individual patient to generate case-specific advice. The study provides an overview of the literature to analyze current available mDSS focused on prostate cancer (PCa), in order to better understand the availability of decision support tools as well as where the current literature is lacking. Methods We performed a MEDLINE literature search in July 2018. We divided the included studies into different sections: diagnostic, which aids in detection or staging of PCa; treatment, supporting the decision between treatment modalities; and patient, which focusses on informing the patient. We manually screened and excluded studies that did not contain an mDSS concerning prostate cancer and study proposals. Results Our search resulted in twelve diagnostic mDSS; six treatment mDSS; two patient mDSS; and eight papers that could improve mDSS. Conclusions Diagnosis mDSS is well represented in the literature as well as treatment mDSS considering external-beam radiotherapy; however, there is a lack of mDSS for other treatment modalities. The development of patient decision aids is a new field of research, and few successes have been made for PCa patients. These tools can improve personalized medicine but need to overcome a number of difficulties to be successful and require more research.
Collapse
|
29
|
Schörghofer A, Drerup M, Kunit T, Lusuardi L, Holzinger J, Karner J, Groher M, Zoubek C, Forstner R, Sedlmayer F, Wolf F. Rectum-spacer related acute toxicity - endoscopy results of 403 prostate cancer patients after implantation of gel or balloon spacers. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14:47. [PMID: 30876433 PMCID: PMC6419822 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1248-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2018] [Accepted: 03/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Rectal spacers are used to limit dose to the anterior rectal wall in high dose external beam radiation therapy of the prostate and have been shown to reduce radiation induced toxicity. Here we report the complication rate and toxicity of the implantation procedure in a large cohort of patients who have either received a gel- or balloon-type spacer. Methods In total, 403 patients received rectal spacing, 264 with balloon, 139 with gel. Allocation was non-randomized. Two hundred seventy-six patients were treated with normofractionated regimen, the remaining 125 patients in moderate hypofractionation. Spacer related acute and late rectal toxicity was prospectively assessed by endoscopy using a mucosa scoring system (Vienna Rectoscopy Score) as well as CTCAE V.4. For the balloon subgroup, position and rotation of balloon spacers were additionally correlated to incidence and grade of rectal reactions in a post-hoc analysis of post-implant planning MRIs. Results Overall rectal toxicity was very low with average VRS scores of 0.06 at the day after implantation, 0.10 at the end of RT, 0.31 at 6 months and 0.42 at 12 months follow up. Acute Grade 3 toxicity (rectum perforation and urethral damage) directly related to the implantation procedure occurred in 1.49% (n = 6) and was seen exclusively in patients who had received the spacer balloon. Analysis of post implant MR imaging did not identify abnormal or mal-rotated positions of this spacer to be a predictive factors for the occurrence of spacer related G3 toxicities. Conclusions Spacer technology is an effective means to minimize dose to the anterior rectal wall. However, the benefits in terms of dose sparing need to be weighed against the low, but possible risks of complications such as rectum perforation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Schörghofer
- Dapartment of Radiotherapy and Radio-Oncology, LKH Salzburg University Clinics, Paracelsus Medical University, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Martin Drerup
- Department of Urology, LKH Salzburg University Clinics, Paracelsus Medical University, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Thomas Kunit
- Department of Urology, LKH Salzburg University Clinics, Paracelsus Medical University, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Lukas Lusuardi
- Department of Urology, LKH Salzburg University Clinics, Paracelsus Medical University, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Josef Holzinger
- Department of Surgery, LKH Salzburg University Clinics, Paracelsus Medical University, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Josef Karner
- Dapartment of Radiotherapy and Radio-Oncology, LKH Salzburg University Clinics, Paracelsus Medical University, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Michael Groher
- Dapartment of Radiotherapy and Radio-Oncology, LKH Salzburg University Clinics, Paracelsus Medical University, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Christoph Zoubek
- Department of Radiology, LKH Salzburg University Clinics, Paracelsus Medical University, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Rosemarie Forstner
- Department of Radiology, LKH Salzburg University Clinics, Paracelsus Medical University, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Felix Sedlmayer
- Dapartment of Radiotherapy and Radio-Oncology, LKH Salzburg University Clinics, Paracelsus Medical University, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Frank Wolf
- Dapartment of Radiotherapy and Radio-Oncology, LKH Salzburg University Clinics, Paracelsus Medical University, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Evolution of definitive external beam radiation therapy in the treatment of prostate cancer. World J Urol 2019; 38:565-591. [PMID: 30850855 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02661-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2018] [Accepted: 01/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Although the clinical significance of a diagnosis of prostate cancer for some men is debated, for many men it leads to significant morbidity and mortality. Radical treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer has been shown to improve survival in men with intermediate or high-risk disease. There is no high level evidence to support the superiority of radical prostatectomy, with or without adjuvant or salvage external beam radiotherapy in comparison to definitive radiotherapy with or without androgen deprivation, and the choice should be individualized. External beam radiation therapy practices are in constant evolution, and numerous strategies have been investigated to improve either efficacy or reduce toxicity, or both. METHODS Randomized controlled trials investigating strategies to improve efficacy, reduce toxicity, or both of external beam radiotherapy have been reviewed in men with prostate cancer without nodal or distant metastases. These strategies include the use of neo-adjuvant and adjuvant androgen deprivation, dose-escalation, hypofractionation, whole pelvic radiation therapy, incorporation of improved imaging, image- guided radiation therapy, and adjuvant systemic therapy. The evidence to date for these strategies is discussed, noting limitations in applying the results of reported trials to men treated in contemporary settings. RESULTS A number of strategies have shown improvements in biochemical control using external beam radiotherapy. To date, only with the use of androgen deprivation therapy has this translated into improvements in disease specific and overall survival. This may reflect the long natural history of prostate cancer and high incidence of competing risks. Technological advances have enabled dose escalation with reduced toxicity, of paramount importance given the long natural history. RESULTS The use of external beam radiation therapy in prostate cancer is evolving with numerous strategies incorporated to improve outcomes. The optimum dose and fractionation and use of androgen deprivation or systemic adjuvants for each man is unclear based on current evidence and prognostic and predictive parameters. Patient preferences play an important role in chosen therapy. It is hoped that future studies better capture all prostate cancer- and treatment- related morbidity to clarify the optimal therapy choices for each man with prostate cancer.
Collapse
|
31
|
Rectal wall delineation in patients with a rectal displacement device in place during prostate cancer radiotherapy. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s13566-019-00378-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
32
|
Vanneste BG, Buettner F, Pinkawa M, Lambin P, Hoffmann AL. Ano-rectal wall dose-surface maps localize the dosimetric benefit of hydrogel rectum spacers in prostate cancer radiotherapy. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2019; 14:17-24. [PMID: 30456317 PMCID: PMC6234617 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2018.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2018] [Revised: 10/31/2018] [Accepted: 10/31/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To evaluate spatial differences in dose distributions of the ano-rectal wall (ARW) using dose-surface maps (DSMs) between prostate cancer patients receiving intensity-modulated radiation therapy with and without implantable rectum spacer (IMRT+IRS; IMRT-IRS, respectively), and to correlate this with late gastro-intestinal (GI) toxicities using validated spatial and non-spatial normal-tissue complication probability (NTCP) models. MATERIALS AND METHODS For 26 patients DSMs of the ARW were generated. From the DSMs various shape-based dose measures were calculated at different dose levels: lateral extent, longitudinal extent, and eccentricity. The contiguity of the ARW dose distribution was assessed by the contiguous-DSH (cDSH). Predicted complication rates between IMRT+IRS and IMRT-IRS plans were assessed using a spatial NTCP model and compared against a non-spatial NTCP model. RESULTS Dose surface maps are generated for prostate radiotherapy using an IRS. Lateral extent, longitudinal extent and cDSH were significantly lower in IMRT+IRS than for IMRT-IRS at high-dose levels. Largest significant differences were observed for cDSH at dose levels >50 Gy, followed by lateral extent at doses >57 Gy, and longitudinal extent in anterior and superior-inferior directions. Significant decreases (p = 0.01) in median rectal and anal NTCPs (respectively, Gr 2 late rectal bleeding and subjective sphincter control) were predicted when using an IRS. CONCLUSIONS Local-dose effects are predicted to be significantly reduced by an IRS. The spatial NTCP model predicts a significant decrease in Gr 2 late rectal bleeding and subjective sphincter control. Dose constraints can be improved for current clinical treatment planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Michael Pinkawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MediClin Robert Janker Klinik, Bonn, Germany
| | - Philippe Lambin
- The D-Lab, GROW – School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Aswin L. Hoffmann
- MAASTRO Clinic, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Institute of Radiooncology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus at the Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Struik GM, Pignol JP, Kolkman-Deurloo IK, Godart J, Verduijn GM, Koppert LB, Birnie E, Ghandi A, Klem TM. Subcutaneous spacer injection to reduce skin toxicity in breast brachytherapy: A pilot study on mastectomy specimens. Brachytherapy 2018; 18:204-210. [PMID: 30528494 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2018.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2018] [Revised: 10/23/2018] [Accepted: 11/05/2018] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Accelerated partial breast irradiation is a treatment option for selected patients with early-stage breast cancer. Some accelerated partial breast irradiation techniques lead to skin toxicity with the skin dose as a main risk factor. Biodegradable spacers are effective and safe in prostate brachytherapy to protect the rectum. We hypothesize that a subcutaneous spacer injection reduces the skin dose in breast brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS Ultrasound-guided spacer injections, either hyaluronic acid (HA) or iodined polyethylene glycol (PEG), were performed on fresh mastectomy specimens. Success was defined as a spacer thickness of ≥5 mm in the high-dose skin area. Usability was scored using the system usability scale. Pre and postinjection CT scans were used to generate low-dose-rate seed brachytherapy treatment plans after defining a clinical target volume. Maximum dose to small skin volumes (D0.2cc) and existence of hotspots (isodose ≥90% on 1 cm2 of skin) were calculated as skin toxicity indicators. RESULTS We collected 22 mastectomy specimens; half had HA and half had PEG injection. Intervention success was 100% for HA and 90.9% for PEG (p = NS). Hydrodissection was feasible in 81.8% with HA and 63.6% with PEG. Median system usability scale score was 97.5 for HA and 82.5 for PEG (p < 0.001). Mean D0.2cc was 80.8 Gy without spacer and 53.7 Gy with spacer (p < 0.001). Skin hotspots were present in 40.9% without spacer but none with spacer (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS A spacer injection in mastectomy specimens is feasible. An extra 5 mm space is always achieved, thereby potentially reducing the skin dose dramatically in low-dose-rate seed breast brachytherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerson M Struik
- Department of Surgery, Franciscus Gasthuis and Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Jean-Philippe Pignol
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | | | - Jeremy Godart
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gerda M Verduijn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Linetta B Koppert
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Erwin Birnie
- Department of Statistics and Education, Franciscus Gasthuis and Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Division of Woman and Baby, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ali Ghandi
- Department of Radiology, Franciscus Gasthuis and Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Taco M Klem
- Department of Surgery, Franciscus Gasthuis and Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Leiker AJ, Desai NB, Folkert MR. Rectal radiation dose-reduction techniques in prostate cancer: a focus on the rectal spacer. Future Oncol 2018; 14:2773-2788. [PMID: 29939069 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2018-0286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men. External beam radiotherapy by a variety of methods is a standard treatment option with excellent disease control. However, acute and late rectal side effects remain a limiting concern in intensification of therapy in higher-risk patients and in efforts to reduce treatment burden in others. A number of techniques have emerged that allow for high-radiation dose delivery to the prostate with reduced risk of rectal toxicity, including image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy, endorectal balloons and various forms of rectal spacers. Image-guided radiation therapy, either intensity-modulated radiation therapy or stereotactic ablative radiation therapy, in conjunction with a rectal spacer, is an efficacious means to reduce acute and long-term rectal toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J Leiker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 2280 Inwood Road, Dallas, TX 75390-9303, USA
| | - Neil B Desai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 2280 Inwood Road, Dallas, TX 75390-9303, USA
| | - Michael R Folkert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 2280 Inwood Road, Dallas, TX 75390-9303, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
BioPro-RCMI-1505 trial: multicenter study evaluating the use of a biodegradable balloon for the treatment of intermediate risk prostate cancer by intensity modulated radiotherapy; study protocol. BMC Cancer 2018; 18:566. [PMID: 29769060 PMCID: PMC5956854 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4492-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2017] [Accepted: 05/08/2018] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Prospective trials have demonstrated the advantage of dose-escalated radiotherapy for the biochemical and clinical control of intermediate risk prostate cancer. Dose escalation improves outcomes but increases risks of urinary and bowel toxicity. Recently the contribution of “spacers” positioned in the septum between the rectum and the prostate could improve the functional results of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). To date most of the evaluated devices were polyethylen glycol (PEG) and hyaluronic acid (HA). Men on the Spacer arm had decreased bowel toxicity and less decline in both urinary and bowel quality of life as compared to Control men in a randomized trial. Methods This is an interventional, multi-center study to evaluate the use of biodegradable inflatable balloon for patients with intermediate risk prostate cancer treated by IMRT (74 to 80 Gy, 2 Gy/fraction) with daily image guided radiotherapy. Discussion This multicenter prospective study will yield new data regarding dosimetric gain and implantation stages of Bioprotect balloon. Acute and late toxicities and quality of life will be registered too. Trial registration NCT02478112, date of registration: 15/06/2015.
Collapse
|
36
|
Chao M, Ho H, Chan Y, Tan A, Pham T, Bolton D, Troy A, Temelcos C, Sengupta S, McMillan K, Cham CW, Liu M, Ding W, Subramanian B, Wasiak J, Lim Joon D, Spencer S, Lawrentschuk N. Prospective analysis of hydrogel spacer for patients with prostate cancer undergoing radiotherapy. BJU Int 2018. [PMID: 29520983 DOI: 10.1111/bju.14192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report on the dosimetric benefits and late toxicity outcomes after injection of hydrogel spacer (HS) between the prostate and rectum for patients treated with prostate radiotherapy (RT). PATIENTS AND METHODS In all, 76 patients with a clinical stage of T1-T3a prostate cancer underwent general anaesthesia for fiducial marker insertion plus injection of the HS into the perirectal space before intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) or volumetric-modulated arc RT (VMAT). HS safety, dosimetric benefits, and the immediate- to long-term effects of gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity were assessed. RESULTS There were no postoperative complications reported. The mean (range) prostate size was 66.0 (25.0-187.0) mm. Rectal dose volume parameters were observed and the volume of rectum receiving 70 Gy (rV70 ), 75 Gy (rV75 ) and 78 Gy (rV78 ) was 7.8%, 3.6% and 0.4%, respectively. In all, 21% of patients (16/76) developed acute Grade 1 GI toxicities, but all were resolved completely by 3 months after treatment; whilst, 3% of patients (2/76) developed late Grade 1 GI toxicities. No patients had acute or late Grade ≥2 GI toxicities. CONCLUSION Injection of HS resulted in a reduction of irradiated rectal dose volumes along with minimal GI toxicities, irrespective of prostate size.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Chao
- The Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Vic., Australia.,Genesis Cancer Care Victoria, Ringwood East, Vic., Australia
| | - Huong Ho
- Genesis Cancer Care Victoria, Ringwood East, Vic., Australia
| | - Yee Chan
- The Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Vic., Australia.,Ringwood Private Hospital, Ringwood East, Vic., Australia
| | - Alwin Tan
- The Bays Hospital, Mornington, Vic., Australia
| | - Trung Pham
- The Valley Private Hospital, Mulgrave, Vic., Australia
| | - Damien Bolton
- The Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Vic., Australia.,Ringwood Private Hospital, Ringwood East, Vic., Australia
| | - Andrew Troy
- The Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Vic., Australia
| | | | - Shomik Sengupta
- The Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Vic., Australia.,Melbourne University; Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Clayton, Vic., Australia
| | - Kevin McMillan
- Ringwood Private Hospital, Ringwood East, Vic., Australia
| | | | - Madalena Liu
- Ringwood Private Hospital, Ringwood East, Vic., Australia
| | - Wei Ding
- Genesis Cancer Care Victoria, Ringwood East, Vic., Australia
| | | | - Jason Wasiak
- The Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Vic., Australia.,University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Daryl Lim Joon
- The Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Vic., Australia.,Genesis Cancer Care Victoria, Ringwood East, Vic., Australia
| | - Sandra Spencer
- Genesis Cancer Care Victoria, Ringwood East, Vic., Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Vanneste BGL, van De Beek K, Lutgens L, Lambin P. Implantation of a biodegradable rectum balloon implant: tips, Tricks and Pitfalls. Int Braz J Urol 2018; 43:1033-1042. [PMID: 28338306 PMCID: PMC5734065 DOI: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2016.0494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2016] [Accepted: 12/20/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: A rectum balloon implant (RBI) is a new device to spare rectal structures during prostate cancer radiotherapy. The theoretical advantages of a RBI are to reduce the high radiation dose to the anterior rectum wall, the possibility of a post-implant correction, and their predetermined shape with consequent predictable position. Objective: To describe, step-by-step, our mini-invasive technique for hands-free transperineal implantation of a RBI before start of radiotherapy treatment. Materials and Methods: We provide step-by-step instructions for optimization of the transperineal implantation procedure performed by urologists and/or radiation oncologists experienced with prostate brachytherapy and the use of the real-time bi-plane transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) probe. A RBI was performed in 15 patients with localised prostate cancer. Perioperative side-effects were reported. Results: We provide ‘tips and tricks’ for optimizing the procedure and proper positioning of the RBI. Please watch the animation, see video in https://vimeo.com/205852376/789df4fae4. The side-effects included mild discomfort to slight pain at the perineal region in 8 out of 15 patients. Seven patients (47%) had no complaints at all. Two patients developed redness of the skin, where prompt antibiotic regimen was started with no further sequelae. One patient revealed a temporary urine retention, which resolved in a few hours following conservative treatment. Further no perioperative complications occurred. Conclusion: This paper describes in detail the implantation procedure for an RBI. It is a feasible, safe and very well-tolerated procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben G L Vanneste
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Kees van De Beek
- Department of Urology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Ludy Lutgens
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Philippe Lambin
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
King RB, Osman SO, Fairmichael C, Irvine DM, Lyons CA, Ravi A, O'Sullivan JM, Hounsell AR, Mitchell DM, McGarry CK, Jain S. Efficacy of a rectal spacer with prostate SABR-first UK experience. Br J Radiol 2018; 91:20170672. [PMID: 29182384 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20170672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study assessed the use of implanted hydrogel rectal spacers for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy-volumetric modulated arc therapy (SABR-VMAT) patients, investigating practicality, dosimetric impact, normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) and early toxicity. METHODS Data from the first 6 patients treated within a prostate SABR and rectal spacer trial were examined to determine spacer insertion tolerability, resultant changes in treatment planning and dosimetry and early toxicity effects. CT scans acquired prior to spacer insertion were used to generate SABR plans which were compared to post-insertion plans. Plans were evaluated for target coverage, conformity, and organs at risk doses with NTCPs also determined from resultant dose fluences. Early toxicity data were also collected. RESULTS All patients had successful spacer insertion under local anaesthetic with maximal Grade 1 toxicity. All plans were highly conformal, with no significant differences in clinical target volume dose coverage between pre- and post-spacer plans. Substantial improvements in rectal dose metrics were observed in post-spacer plans, e.g. rectal volume receiving 36 Gy reduced by ≥42% for all patients. Median NTCP for Grade 2 + rectal bleeding significantly decreased from 4.9 to 0.8% with the use of a rectal spacer (p = 0.031). To date, two episodes of acute Grade 1 proctitis have been reported following treatment. CONCLUSION The spacer resulted in clinically and statistically significant reduction in rectal doses for all patients. Advances in knowledge: This is one of the first studies to investigate the efficacy of a hydrogel spacer in prostate SABR treatments. Observed dose sparing of the rectum is predicted to result in meaningful clinical benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raymond B King
- 1 Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast , Belfast , Ireland.,2 Radiotherapy Physics, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast City Hospital , Belfast , Ireland
| | - Sarah Os Osman
- 1 Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast , Belfast , Ireland.,2 Radiotherapy Physics, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast City Hospital , Belfast , Ireland
| | - Ciaran Fairmichael
- 1 Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast , Belfast , Ireland.,3 Department of Clinical Oncology, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast City Hospital , Belfast , Ireland
| | - Denise M Irvine
- 2 Radiotherapy Physics, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast City Hospital , Belfast , Ireland
| | - Ciara A Lyons
- 1 Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast , Belfast , Ireland.,3 Department of Clinical Oncology, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast City Hospital , Belfast , Ireland.,4 Department of Clinical Oncology, North West Cancer Centre, Altnagelvin Area Hospital , Londonderry , Northern Ireland
| | - Ananth Ravi
- 5 Department of Medical Physics, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre , Toronto , Canada
| | - Joe M O'Sullivan
- 1 Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast , Belfast , Ireland.,3 Department of Clinical Oncology, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast City Hospital , Belfast , Ireland
| | - Alan R Hounsell
- 1 Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast , Belfast , Ireland.,2 Radiotherapy Physics, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast City Hospital , Belfast , Ireland
| | - Darren M Mitchell
- 3 Department of Clinical Oncology, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast City Hospital , Belfast , Ireland
| | - Conor K McGarry
- 1 Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast , Belfast , Ireland.,2 Radiotherapy Physics, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast City Hospital , Belfast , Ireland
| | - Suneil Jain
- 1 Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast , Belfast , Ireland.,3 Department of Clinical Oncology, Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast City Hospital , Belfast , Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Vanneste BGL, van Wijk Y, Lutgens LC, Van Limbergen EJ, van Lin EN, van de Beek K, Lambin P, Hoffmann AL. Dynamics of rectal balloon implant shrinkage in prostate VMAT : Influence on anorectal dose and late rectal complication risk. Strahlenther Onkol 2017; 194:31-40. [PMID: 29038832 PMCID: PMC5752748 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-017-1222-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2017] [Accepted: 09/19/2017] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the effect of a shrinking rectal balloon implant (RBI) on the anorectal dose and complication risk during the course of moderately hypofractionated prostate radiotherapy. METHODS In 15 patients with localized prostate cancer, an RBI was implanted. A weekly kilovolt cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan was acquired to measure the dynamics of RBI volume and prostate-rectum separation. The absolute anorectal volume encompassed by the 2 Gy equieffective 75 Gy isodose (V75Gy) was recalculated as well as the mean anorectal dose. The increase in estimated risk of grade 2-3 late rectal bleeding (LRB) between the start and end of treatment was predicted using nomograms. The observed acute and late toxicities were evaluated. RESULTS A significant shrinkage of RBI volumes was observed, with an average volume of 70.4% of baseline at the end of the treatment. Although the prostate-rectum separation significantly decreased over time, it remained at least 1 cm. No significant increase in V75Gy of the anorectum was observed, except in one patient whose RBI had completely deflated in the third week of treatment. No correlation between mean anorectal dose and balloon deflation was found. The increase in predicted LRB risk was not significant, except in the one patient whose RBI completely deflated. The observed toxicities confirmed these findings. CONCLUSIONS Despite significant decrease in RBI volume the high-dose rectal volume and the predicted LRB risk were unaffected due to a persistent spacing between the prostate and the anterior rectal wall.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben G L Vanneste
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P.O. Box 3035, 6202 NA, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Y van Wijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P.O. Box 3035, 6202 NA, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - L C Lutgens
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P.O. Box 3035, 6202 NA, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - E J Van Limbergen
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P.O. Box 3035, 6202 NA, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - E N van Lin
- Radiotherapy Bonn-Rhein-Sieg, Troisdorf, Germany
| | - K van de Beek
- Department of Urology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - P Lambin
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P.O. Box 3035, 6202 NA, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - A L Hoffmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P.O. Box 3035, 6202 NA, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus at the Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
[Therapeutic innovations in radiation oncology for localized prostate cancer]. Cancer Radiother 2017; 21:454-461. [PMID: 28890087 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2017.07.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2017] [Revised: 07/21/2017] [Accepted: 07/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Intensity-modulated radiation therapy, image-guided radiation therapy with fiducial markers and prostate brachytherapy allow the delivery of dose escalation for localized prostate cancer with very low rates of long-term toxicity and sequelae. Nowadays, modern radiotherapy techniques make it possible to shorten treatment time with hypofractionation, to better protect surrounding healthy tissues and to escalate the dose even further. Advances in radiotherapy are closely linked to advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or PET imaging. Functional imaging makes it possible to deliver personalised pelvic nodal radiotherapy, targeting the nodal areas at higher risk of microscopic involvement. In patients with an index lesion at baseline or at failure, MR-based focal therapy or focal dose escalation with brachytherapy or stereotactic body radiation therapy is also currently investigated. MR-based adaptive radiotherapy, which makes it possible to track prostate shifts during radiation delivery, is another step forward in the integration of MR imaging in radiation delivery.
Collapse
|
41
|
Vilotte F, Antoine M, Bobin M, Latorzeff I, Supiot S, Richaud P, Thomas L, Leduc N, Guérif S, Iriondo-Alberdi J, de Crevoisier R, Sargos P. Post-Prostatectomy Image-Guided Radiotherapy: The Invisible Target Concept. Front Oncol 2017; 7:34. [PMID: 28337425 PMCID: PMC5343009 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2017.00034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2017] [Accepted: 02/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
In the era of intensity-modulated radiation therapy, image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) appears crucial to control dose delivery and to promote dose escalation while allowing healthy tissue sparing. The place of IGRT following radical prostatectomy is poorly described in the literature. This review aims to highlight some key points on the different IGRT techniques applicable to prostatic bed radiotherapy. Furthermore, methods used to evaluate target motion and to reduce planning target volume margins will also be explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florent Vilotte
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Bergonié , Bordeaux Cedex , France
| | - Mickael Antoine
- Department of Medical Physics, Institut Bergonié , Bordeaux Cedex , France
| | - Maxime Bobin
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Bergonié , Bordeaux Cedex , France
| | - Igor Latorzeff
- Department of Radiotherapy, Groupe ONCORAD, Clinique Pasteur , Toulouse , France
| | - Stéphane Supiot
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest René Gauducheau , Nantes , France
| | - Pierre Richaud
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Bergonié , Bordeaux Cedex , France
| | - Laurence Thomas
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Bergonié , Bordeaux Cedex , France
| | - Nicolas Leduc
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Bergonié , Bordeaux Cedex , France
| | - Stephane Guérif
- Department of Radiotherapy, CHU de Poitier , Poitiers , France
| | | | | | - Paul Sargos
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Bergonié , Bordeaux Cedex , France
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Chung H, Polf J, Badiyan S, Biagioli M, Fernandez D, Latifi K, Wilder R, Mehta M, Chuong M. Rectal dose to prostate cancer patients treated with proton therapy with or without rectal spacer. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2017; 18:32-39. [PMID: 28291917 PMCID: PMC5689902 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2016] [Accepted: 09/08/2016] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a spacer inserted in the prerectal space could reduce modeled rectal dose and toxicity rates for patients with prostate cancer treated in silico with pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy. A total of 20 patients were included in this study who received photon therapy (12 with rectal spacer (DuraSeal™ gel) and 8 without). Two PBS treatment plans were retrospectively created for each patient using the following beam arrangements: (1) lateral-opposed (LAT) fields and (2) left and right anterior oblique (LAO/RAO) fields. Dose volume histograms (DVH) were generated for the prostate, rectum, bladder, and right and left femoral heads. The normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for ≥grade 2 rectal toxicity was calculated using the Lyman-Kutcher-Burman model and compared between patients with and without the rectal spacer. A significantly lower mean rectal DVH was achieved in patients with rectal spacer compared to those without. For LAT plans, the mean rectal V70 with and without rectal spacer was 4.19 and 13.5%, respectively. For LAO/RAO plans, the mean rectal V70 with and without rectal spacer was 5.07 and 13.5%, respectively. No significant differences were found in any rectal dosimetric parameters between the LAT and the LAO/RAO plans generated with the rectal spacers. We found that ≥ 9 mm space resulted in a significant decrease in NTCP modeled for ≥grade 2 rectal toxicity. Rectal spacers can significantly decrease modeled rectal dose and predicted ≥grade 2 rectal toxicity in prostate cancer patients treated in silico with PBS. A minimum of 9 mm separation between the prostate and anterior rectal wall yields the largest benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heeteak Chung
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of MarylandBaltimore School of MedicineBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - Jerimy Polf
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of MarylandBaltimore School of MedicineBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - Shahed Badiyan
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of MarylandBaltimore School of MedicineBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - Matthew Biagioli
- Department of Radiation OncologyFlorida Hospital Cancer InstituteOrlandoFLUSA
| | - Daniel Fernandez
- Department of Radiation OncologyH. Lee Moffitt Cancer CenterTampaFLUSA
| | - Kujtim Latifi
- Department of Radiation OncologyH. Lee Moffitt Cancer CenterTampaFLUSA
| | - Richard Wilder
- Department of Radiation OncologyH. Lee Moffitt Cancer CenterTampaFLUSA
| | - Minesh Mehta
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of MarylandBaltimore School of MedicineBaltimoreMDUSA
| | - Michael Chuong
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of MarylandBaltimore School of MedicineBaltimoreMDUSA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Prostate Cancer Radiation Therapy: What Do Clinicians Have to Know? BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2016; 2016:6829875. [PMID: 28116302 PMCID: PMC5225325 DOI: 10.1155/2016/6829875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2016] [Revised: 10/18/2016] [Accepted: 10/31/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer (PC) has steadily evolved over the last decades, with improving biochemical disease-free survival. Recently population based research also revealed an association between overall survival and doses ≥ 75.6 Gray (Gy) in men with intermediate- and high-risk PC. Examples of improved RT techniques are image-guided RT, intensity-modulated RT, volumetric modulated arc therapy, and stereotactic ablative body RT, which could facilitate further dose escalation. Brachytherapy is an internal form of RT that also developed substantially. New devices such as rectum spacers and balloons have been developed to spare rectal structures. Newer techniques like protons and carbon ions have the intrinsic characteristics maximising the dose on the tumour while minimising the effect on the surrounding healthy tissue, but clinical data are needed for confirmation in randomised phase III trials. Furthermore, it provides an overview of an important discussion issue in PC treatment between urologists and radiation oncologists: the comparison between radical prostatectomy and RT. Current literature reveals that all possible treatment modalities have the same cure rate, but a different toxicity pattern. We recommend proposing the possible different treatment modalities with their own advantages and side-effects to the individual patient. Clinicians and patients should make treatment decisions together (shared decision-making) while using patient decision aids.
Collapse
|
44
|
Zilli T, Benz E, Dipasquale G, Rouzaud M, Miralbell R. Reirradiation of Prostate Cancer Local Failures After Previous Curative Radiation Therapy: Long-Term Outcome and Tolerance. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2016; 96:318-322. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.05.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2016] [Revised: 05/16/2016] [Accepted: 05/23/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
45
|
Who will benefit most from hydrogel rectum spacer implantation in prostate cancer radiotherapy? A model-based approach for patient selection. Radiother Oncol 2016; 121:118-123. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.08.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2016] [Revised: 08/05/2016] [Accepted: 08/29/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
46
|
Basu A, Haim-Zada M, Domb AJ. Biodegradable inflatable balloons for tissue separation. Biomaterials 2016; 105:109-116. [DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2016] [Revised: 08/03/2016] [Accepted: 08/03/2016] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
47
|
In Regard to Habl et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2016; 96:241-2. [PMID: 27511861 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2016] [Accepted: 04/06/2016] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
48
|
De Bari B, Arcangeli S, Ciardo D, Mazzola R, Alongi F, Russi EG, Santoni R, Magrini SM, Jereczek-Fossa BA. Extreme hypofractionation for early prostate cancer: Biology meets technology. Cancer Treat Rev 2016; 50:48-60. [PMID: 27631875 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2016.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2016] [Revised: 08/11/2016] [Accepted: 08/16/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this review is to present the available radiobiological, technical and clinical data about extreme hypofractionation in primary prostate cancer radiotherapy. The interest in this technique is based on the favourable radiobiological characteristics of prostate cancer and supported by advantageous logistic aspects deriving from short overall treatment time. The clinical validity of short-term treatment schedule is proven by a body of non-randomised studies, using both isocentric (LINAC-based) or non-isocentric (CyberKnife®-based) stereotactic body irradiation techniques. Twenty clinical studies, each enrolling more than 40 patients for a total of 1874 treated patients, were revised in terms of technological setting, toxicity, outcome and quality of life assessment. The implemented strategies for the tracking of the prostate and the sparing of the rectal wall have been investigated with particular attention. The urinary toxicity after prostate stereotactic body irradiation seems slightly more pronounced as compared to rectal adverse events, and this is more evident for late occurring events, but no worse as respect to conventional fractionation schemes. As far as the rate of severe acute toxicity is concerned, in all the available studies the treatment was globally well tolerated. While awaiting long-term data on efficacy and toxicity, the analysed studies suggest that the outcome profile of this approach, alongside the patient convenience and reduced costs, is promising. Forty-eight ongoing clinical trials are also presented as a preview of the expectation from the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Berardino De Bari
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Stefano Arcangeli
- Division of Radiation Oncology, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospitals, Rome, Italy
| | - Delia Ciardo
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
| | - Rosario Mazzola
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Cancer Care Center, Negrar-Verona, Italy
| | - Filippo Alongi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Cancer Care Center, Negrar-Verona, Italy
| | - Elvio G Russi
- S.C. di Radioterapia Oncologica, Azienda ospedaliera S. Croce e Carle, Cuneo, Italy
| | - Riccardo Santoni
- Università di Roma, Tor Vergata, U.O.C. di Radioterapia, Policlinico Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy
| | - Stefano M Magrini
- Istituto del Radio "O. Alberti", Spedali Civili, Università di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Barbara A Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Müller AC, Mischinger J, Klotz T, Gagel B, Habl G, Hatiboglu G, Pinkawa M. Interdisciplinary consensus statement on indication and application of a hydrogel spacer for prostate radiotherapy based on experience in more than 250 patients. Radiol Oncol 2016; 50:329-36. [PMID: 27679550 PMCID: PMC5024663 DOI: 10.1515/raon-2016-0036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2016] [Accepted: 04/17/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of the study was to reach a consensus on indication and application of a hydrogel spacer based on multicentre experience and give new users important information to shorten the learning curve for this innovative technique. Methods The interdisciplinary meeting was attended by radiation oncologists and urologists, each with experience of 23 – 138 hydrogel injections (SpaceOAR®) in prostate cancer patients before dose-escalated radiotherapy. User experience was discussed and questions were defined to comprise practical information relevant for successful hydrogel injection and treatment. Answers to the defined key questions were generated. Hydrogel-associated side effects were collected to estimate the percentage, treatment and prognosis of potential risks. Results The main indication for hydrogel application was dose-escalated radiotherapy for histologically confirmed low or intermediate risk prostate cancer. It was not recommended in locally advanced prostate cancer. The injection or implantation was performed under transrectal ultrasound guidance via the transperineal approach after prior hydrodissection. The rate of injection-related G2-toxicity was 2% (n = 5) in a total of 258 hydrogel applications. The most frequent complication (n = 4) was rectal wall penetration, diagnosed at different intervals after hydrogel injection and treated conservatively. Conclusions A consensus was reached on the application of a hydrogel spacer. Current experience demonstrated feasibility, which could promote initiation of this method in more centres to reduce radiation-related gastrointestinal toxicity of dose-escalated IGRT. However, a very low rate of a potential serious adverse event could not be excluded. Therefore, the application should carefully be discussed with the patient and be balanced against potential benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Theodor Klotz
- Department of Urology, Hospital Weiden, Weiden, Germany
| | - Bernd Gagel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Weiden, Weiden, Germany
| | - Gregor Habl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Gencay Hatiboglu
- Department of Urology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Pinkawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Vanhanen A, Kapanen M. The effect of rectal retractor on intrafraction motion of the prostate. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2016. [DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/2/3/035021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|