1
|
Van Damme A, Tummers P, De Visschere P, Van Dorpe J, Van de Vijver K, Vercauteren T, De Gersem W, Denys H, Naert E, Makar A, De Neve W, Vandecasteele K. Exclusion of non-Involved uterus from the target volume (EXIT-trial): An individualized treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer using modern radiotherapy and imaging techniques followed by completion surgery. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 47:100793. [PMID: 38798749 PMCID: PMC11126536 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Revised: 04/29/2024] [Accepted: 05/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Chemoradiotherapy followed by brachytherapy is the standard of care for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). In this study, we postulate that omitting an iconographical unaffected uterus (+12 mm distance from the tumour) from the treatment volume is safe and that no tumour will be found in the non-targeted uterus (NTU) leading to reduction of high-dose volumes of surrounding organs at risk (OARs). Material and Methods In this single-arm phase 2 study, two sets of target volumes were delineated: one standard-volume (whole uterus) and an EXIT-volume (exclusion of non-tumour-bearing parts of the uterus with a minimum 12 mm margin from the tumour). All patients underwent chemoradiotherapy targeting the EXIT-volume, followed by completion hysterectomy. In 15 patients, a plan comparison between two treatment plans (PTV vs PTV_EXIT) was performed. The primary endpoint was the pathological absence of tumour involvement in the non-targeted uterus (NTU). Secondary endpoints included dosimetric impact of target volume reduction on OARs, acute and chronic toxicity, overall survival (OS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and progression-free survival (PFS). Results In all 21 (FIGO stage I: 2; II: 14;III: 3; IV: 2) patients the NTU was pathologically negative. Ssignificant reductions in Dmean in bladder, sigmoid and rectum; V15Gy in sigmoid and rectum, V30Gy in bladder, sigmoid and rectum; V40Gy and V45Gy in bladder, bowel bag, sigmoid and rectum; V50Gy in rectum were achieved. Median follow-up was 54 months (range 7-79 months). Acute toxicity was mainly grade 2 and 5 % grade 3 urinary. The 3y- OS, PFS and LRFS were respectively 76,2%, 64,9% and 81 %. Conclusion MRI-based exclusion of the non-tumour-bearing parts of the uterus at a minimum distance of 12 mm from the tumour out of the target volume in LACC can be done without risk of residual disease in the NTU, leading to a significant reduction of the volume of surrounding OARS treated to high doses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Axel Van Damme
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Philippe Tummers
- Department of Gynaecology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Gynecological Pelvic Oncology Network (GYPON), Ghent University (Hospital), Ghent, Belgium
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Pieter De Visschere
- Gynecological Pelvic Oncology Network (GYPON), Ghent University (Hospital), Ghent, Belgium
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Departement of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium
| | - Jo Van Dorpe
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Koen Van de Vijver
- Gynecological Pelvic Oncology Network (GYPON), Ghent University (Hospital), Ghent, Belgium
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Tom Vercauteren
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Werner De Gersem
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Hannelore Denys
- Department of Gynaecology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Gynecological Pelvic Oncology Network (GYPON), Ghent University (Hospital), Ghent, Belgium
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Gynaecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, ZNA Middelheim Antwerpen, Belgium
| | - Eline Naert
- Department of Gynaecology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Gynecological Pelvic Oncology Network (GYPON), Ghent University (Hospital), Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Gynaecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, ZNA Middelheim Antwerpen, Belgium
| | - Amin Makar
- Gynecological Pelvic Oncology Network (GYPON), Ghent University (Hospital), Ghent, Belgium
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Medical Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Wilfried De Neve
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Katrien Vandecasteele
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Gynecological Pelvic Oncology Network (GYPON), Ghent University (Hospital), Ghent, Belgium
- Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Umezawa R, Tokunaga H, Yamamoto T, Shigeta S, Takahashi N, Takeda K, Suzuki Y, Kishida K, Ito K, Kadoya N, Shimada M, Jingu K. Retrospective analysis of local recurrence pattern by computed tomography image-guided intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer in a single Japanese institution. Brachytherapy 2023; 22:477-486. [PMID: 37208225 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2023.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2022] [Revised: 03/25/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to investigate the treatment results with focus on local control (LC) by computed tomography (CT)-guided intracavity brachytherapy and interstitial brachytherapy (ICBT/ISBT) for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients with LACC undergoing ICBT/ISBT at least once in our institution between January 2017 and June 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. The primary endpoint was local control (LC), and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and late toxicities. Differences between patient subgroups for prognostic factors in LC, PFS, and OS were analyzed using the log-rank test. The recurrence patterns of LC were also investigated. RESULTS Forty-four patients were included in the present study. The median high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) at the initial brachytherapy was 48.2 cc. The median total dose of HR-CTV D90 (EQD2) was 70.7 Gy. The median followup period was 39.4 months. The 3-year LC, PFS and OS rates in all patients were 88.2%, 56.6%, and 65.4% (95% CI 50.3-78.0%), respectively. Corpus invasion and large HR-CTV (70 cc or more) were significant prognostic factors in LC, PFS, and OS. Marginal recurrences at the fundus of the uterus were detected in 3 of 5 patients in whom local recurrence was observed. Late toxicities of Grade 3 or higher were detected in 3 patients (6.8%). CONCLUSIONS Favorable LC was achieved by performing CT-guided ICBT/ISBT for LACC. The brachytherapy strategy for patients with corpus invasion or large HR-CTV may need to be reconsidered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rei Umezawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
| | - Hideki Tokunaga
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Takaya Yamamoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Shogo Shigeta
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Noriyoshi Takahashi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Kazuya Takeda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Yu Suzuki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Keita Kishida
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Kengo Ito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Noriyuki Kadoya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Muneaki Shimada
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Keiichi Jingu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Clinicopathologic analysis of microscopic tumor extension in glioma for external beam radiotherapy planning. BMC Med 2021; 19:269. [PMID: 34784919 PMCID: PMC8597244 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-021-02143-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is no consensus regarding the clinical target volume (CTV) margins in radiotherapy for glioma. In this study, we aimed to perform a complete macropathologic analysis examining microscopic tumor extension (ME) to more accurately define the CTV in glioma. METHODS Thirty-eight supra-total resection specimens of glioma patients were examined on histologic sections. The ME distance, defined as the maximum linear distance from the tumor border to the invasive tumor cells, was measured at each section. We defined the CTV based on the relationships between ME distance and clinicopathologic features. RESULTS Between February 2016 and July 2020, a total of 814 slides were examined, corresponding to 162 slides for low-grade glioma (LGG) and 652 slides for high-grade glioma (HGG). The ME value was 0.69 ± 0.43 cm for LGG and 1.29 ± 0.54 cm for HGG (P < 0.001). After multivariate analysis, tumor grade, O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase promoter methylated status (MGMTm), isocitrate dehydrogenase wild-type status (IDHwt), and 1p/19q non-co-deleted status (non-codel) were positively correlated with ME distance (all P < 0.05). We defined the CTV of glioma based on tumor grade. To take into account approximately 95% of the ME, a margin of 1.00 cm, 1.50 cm, and 2.00 cm were chosen for grade II, grade III, and grade IV glioma, respectively. Paired analysis of molecularly defined patients confirmed that tumors that had all three molecular alterations (i.e., MGMTm/IDHwt/non-codel) were the most aggressive subgroups (all P < 0.05). For these patients, the margin could be up to 1.50 cm, 2.00 cm, and 2.50 cm for grade II, grade III, and grade IV glioma, respectively, to cover the subclinical lesions in 95% of cases. CONCLUSIONS The ME was different between the grades of gliomas. It may be reasonable to recommend 1.00 cm, 1.50 cm, and 2.00 cm CTV margins for grade II, grade III, and grade IV glioma, respectively. Considering the highly aggressive nature of MGMTm/IDHwt/non-codel tumors, for these patients, the margin could be further expanded by 0.5 cm. These recommendations would encompass microscopic disease extension in 95% of cases. TRIAL REGISTRATION The trial was registered with Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( ChiCTR2100049376 ).
Collapse
|
4
|
de Boer P, Spijkerboer AM, Bleeker MCG, van Lonkhuijzen LRCW, Monraats MA, Nederveen AJ, van de Vijver MJ, Kenter GG, Bel A, Rasch CRN, Stoker J, Stalpers LJA. Prospective validation of craniocaudal tumour size on MR imaging compared to histoPAthology in patients with uterine cervical cancer: The MPAC study. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2019; 18:9-15. [PMID: 31341971 PMCID: PMC6610701 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2019.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2019] [Revised: 06/12/2019] [Accepted: 06/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Tumour extension on MRI was compared with histopathology using three methods. MRI visualises tumour extension within a margin of 10 mm compared to microscopy. The major source of measurement uncertainty is post-surgical change of organ.
Purpose To determine the accuracy of MRI in detecting craniocaudal tumour extension, compared to histopathology, of the hysterectomy specimen in patients with early-stage uterine cervical cancer. Three complementary methods were investigated. Materials and methods Thirty-four patients with early-stage cervical cancer had pre-operative MRI, followed by radical hysterectomy or trachelectomy. 1) craniocaudal tumour extension was measured on MRI by two radiologists and compared to microscopy by a pathologist, 2) to compensate for changes in uterine shape between pre-operative MRI and the surgical specimen, craniocaudal tumour extensions were directly compared and appreciated as being a part of a 3-dimensional tumour by a radiation oncologist and resident, and 3) tumour size on MRI was compared macroscopically after digital non-rigid registration of the uterus, uterine cavity and tumour of both modalities. Results The craniocaudal tumour extension measured on histopathology minus MRI gives: 1) on average +3 mm difference when measured by a radiologist compared to the microscopic extension (range −13 to +15 mm), 2) −0.2 mm (range −11 to +6.0 mm) when evaluated on MRI by a radiation oncologist compared to the macroscopic tumour; 3) after non-rigid organ registration, a margin of 10 mm around the tumour on MRI would be needed to cover 95% of the tumour in 90% of the patients. Conclusions Results indicate that microscopic tumour extension towards the uterine fundus is within a margin of 10 mm around the visible tumour on MRI. The major source of measurement uncertainty is post-surgical change of organ shape and form.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter de Boer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anje M Spijkerboer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maaike C G Bleeker
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Luc R C W van Lonkhuijzen
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mélanie A Monraats
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Aart J Nederveen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc J van de Vijver
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gemma G Kenter
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arjan Bel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Coen R N Rasch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jaap Stoker
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lukas J A Stalpers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|