Safeguarding Autonomy of Patients With Bladder Cancer

Bladder cancer

Bladder cancer is a global health issue with sex differences in incidence and prognosis. Bladder cancer has distinct molecular subtypes with multiple pathogenic pathways depending on whether the disease is non-muscle invasive or muscle invasive. The mutational burden is higher in muscle-invasive than in non-muscle-invasive disease. Commonly mutated genes include TERT, FGFR3, TP53, PIK3CA, STAG2 and genes involved in chromatin modification. Subtyping of both forms of bladder cancer is likely to change considerably with the advent of single-cell analysis methods. Early detection signifies a better disease prognosis; thus, minimally invasive diagnostic options are needed to improve patient outcomes. Urine-based tests are available for disease diagnosis and surveillance, and analysis of blood-based cell-free DNA is a promising tool for the detection of minimal residual disease and metastatic relapse. Transurethral resection is the cornerstone treatment for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer and intravesical therapy can further improve oncological outcomes. For muscle-invasive bladder cancer, radical cystectomy with neoadjuvant chemotherapy is the standard of care with evidence supporting trimodality therapy. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated benefit in non-muscle-invasive, muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer. Effective management requires a multidisciplinary approach that considers patient characteristics and molecular disease characteristics.

Setting the stage for bladder preservation

There is an underutilization of potentially curative treatments for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Contemporary trimodality bladder-preservation therapy - which includes a maximally safe transurethral resection of the bladder tumor followed by concurrent chemoradiation and close cystoscopic surveillance with salvage cystectomy reserved for invasive tumor recurrence - can help fulfill this unmet need. Over the past few decades, cumulative published data from prospective clinical trials and large institutional series have established trimodality therapy (TMT) for select patients as a safe and effective alternative to upfront cystectomy. Indeed, TMT is now supported as an accepted option for muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients by numerous clinical guidelines. Following TMT, the vast majority of long-term survivors maintain their native bladders, which tend to function well with relatively low rates of long-term toxicity and good long-term quality of life. There is the potential to further improve outcomes by optimizing systemic therapy integration and by validating predictive biomarkers for improved patient and treatment selection. TMT offers a unique opportunity for urologic surgeons, radiation oncologists and medical oncologists to work hand-in-hand in a multidisciplinary effort to deliver such therapy optimally, to support its research, to promote informed decision-making and ultimately to preserve the autonomy of patients with bladder cancer. The third annual meeting of the Johns Hopkins Greenberg Bladder Cancer Institute/American Urological Association Translational Research Collaboration allowed bladder cancer experts to meet and advance this mission.

Quality Indicators for Bladder Cancer Services: A Collaborative Review

CONTEXT

There is a lack of accepted consensus on what should constitute appropriate quality-of-care indicators for bladder cancer.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the optimal management of bladder cancer and propose quality indicators (QIs).

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic review was performed to identify literature on current optimal management and potential quality indicators for both non-muscle-invasive (NMIBC) and muscle-invasive (MIBC) bladder cancer. A panel of experts was convened to select a recommended list of QIs.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

For NMIBC, preoperative QIs include tobacco cessation counselling and appropriate imaging before initial transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT). Intraoperative QIs include administration of antibiotics, proper safe conduct of TURBT using a checklist, and performing restaging TURBT with biopsy of the prostatic urethra in appropriate cases. Postoperative QIs include appropriate receipt of perioperative adjuvant therapy, risk-stratified surveillance, and appropriate decision to change therapy when indicated (eg, bacillus Calmette-Guerin [BCG] unresponsive). For MIBC, preoperative QIs include multidisciplinary care, selection for candidates for continent urinary diversion, receipt of neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy, time to commencing radical treatment, consideration of trimodal therapy as a bladder-sparing alternative in select patients, preoperative counselling with stoma marking, surgical volume of radical cystectomy, and enhanced recovery after surgery protocols. Intraoperative QIs include adequacy of lymphadenectomy, blood loss, and operative time. Postoperative QIs include prospective standardised monitoring of morbidity and mortality, negative surgical margins for pT2 disease, appropriate surveillance after primary treatment, and adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy in appropriate cases. Participation in clinical trials was highlighted as an important component indicating high quality of care.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose a set of QIs for both NMIBC and MIBC based on established clinical guidelines and the available literature. Although there is currently a lack of level 1 evidence for the benefit of implementing these QIs, we believe that the measurement of these QIs could aid in the improvement and benchmarking of optimal care for bladder cancer.

PATIENT SUMMARY

After a systematic review of existing guidelines and literature, a panel of experts has recommended a set of quality indicators that can help providers and patients measure and strive towards optimal outcomes for bladder cancer care.