1
|
Yu TY, Wang HJ, Sung MT, Chuang YC, Chen YT, Cheng YT, Kang CH, Liu HY, Chang YL, Luo HL. Variant histology is associated with more non-urothelial tract recurrence but less intravesical recurrence for upper tract urothelial carcinoma after radical nephroureterectomy. Int J Urol 2024; 31:410-418. [PMID: 38169055 DOI: 10.1111/iju.15376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the prognostic impact of variant histology (VH) on oncological outcomes in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) who had undergone radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 1239 patients with clinically localized UTUC who underwent RNU at a single institution between January 2005 and June 2020 were included. The VH was reviewed by a uro-pathologist at our institution. The Cox regression model was used to perform multivariate analysis, including VH and other established prognostic factors for post-RNU oncological outcomes (intravesical recurrence [IVR], non-urothelial recurrence, and cancer-specific death). RESULTS Of the 1239 patients with UTUC, 384 patients (31%) were found to have VH. Advanced tumor stage, lymph node metastasis, high tumor grade, lymphovascular invasion, open surgery, and renal pelvis had a significantly larger proportion of UTUC with VH compared to pure UTUC (all p < 0.05). VH was an independent prognostic factor associated with less IVR identified by multivariate analysis, more non-urothelial recurrence, and more cancer-specific mortality. CONCLUSION Patients with VH account for 31% with UTUC treated with RNU in this cohort. VH was an independent prognostic factor associated with more non-urothelial recurrence and cancer-specific mortality but less IVR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsung Yu Yu
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University and College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Hung Jen Wang
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University and College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Min Tse Sung
- Department of Pathology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yao Chi Chuang
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University and College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Center for Shockwave Medicine and Tissue Engineering, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yen Ta Chen
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University and College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yuan Tso Cheng
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University and College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chih Hsiung Kang
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University and College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Hui Ying Liu
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University and College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yin Lun Chang
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University and College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Hao Lun Luo
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University and College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Center for Shockwave Medicine and Tissue Engineering, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pinar U, Calleris G, Grobet-Jeandin E, Grande P, Benamran D, Thibault C, Gontero P, Rouprêt M, Seisen T. The role of perioperative chemotherapy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy. World J Urol 2023; 41:3205-3230. [PMID: 36905443 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04330-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/05/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To summarize evidence regarding the use of neoadjuvant (NAC) and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) among patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). METHODS A comprehensive literature search of PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE and the Cochrane library was performed to identify any original or review article on the role of perioperative chemotherapy for UTUC patients treated with RNU. RESULTS With regards to NAC, retrospective studies consistently suggested that it may be associated with better pathological downstaging (pDS) ranging from 10.8 to 80% and complete response (pCR) ranging from 4.3 to 15%, while decreasing the risk of recurrence and death as compared to RNU alone. Even higher pDS ranging from 58 to 75% and pCR ranging from 14 to 38% were observed in single-arm phase II trials. With regards to AC, retrospective studies provided conflicting results although the largest report from the National Cancer Database suggested an overall survival benefit in pT3-T4 and/or pN + patients. In addition, a phase III randomized controlled trial showed that the use of AC was associated with a disease-free survival benefit (HR = 0.45; 95% CI = [0.30-0.68]; p = 0.0001) in pT2-T4 and/or pN + patients with acceptable toxicity profile. This benefit was consistent in all subgroups analyzed. CONCLUSIONS Perioperative chemotherapy improves oncological outcomes associated with RNU. Given the impact of RNU on renal function, the rational is stronger for the use of NAC which impacts final pathology and potentially prolongs survival. However, the level of evidence is stronger for the use of AC that has been proven to decrease the risk of recurrence after RNU with a potential survival benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ugo Pinar
- GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière, Urology, Sorbonne University, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Giorgio Calleris
- Department of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Città Della Salute E Della Scienza and University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Pietro Grande
- GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière, Urology, Sorbonne University, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Daniel Benamran
- Division of Urology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Constance Thibault
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hopital Européen Georges Pompidou, Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, AP-HP Centre, Paris, France
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Department of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Città Della Salute E Della Scienza and University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière, Urology, Sorbonne University, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Thomas Seisen
- GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière, Urology, Sorbonne University, 75013, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zalay O, Yan M, Sigurdson S, Malone S, Vera-Badillo FE, Mahmud A. Adjuvant Radiotherapy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Curr Oncol 2022; 30:19-36. [PMID: 36661651 PMCID: PMC9858283 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30010002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Revised: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare form of malignancy comprising only 5% of urothelial cancers. The mainstay of treatment is radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) with bladder cuff excision. Neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy is often used in locally advanced disease. The role of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT), however, remains controversial. To further explore the potential role of adjuvant RT, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature from 1990 to present. METHODS AND MATERIALS We identified 810 candidate articles from database searches, of which 67 studies underwent full-text review, with final inclusion of 20 eligible studies. Among the included studies, there were no randomized controlled trials and a single prospective trial, with the remainder being retrospective series. We performed quantitative synthesis of the results by calculating the pooled odds ratios (OR) for the primary outcome of locoregional recurrence (LRR) and secondary outcomes of overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and distant recurrence (DR). RESULTS Adjuvant RT, which was mostly prescribed for locally advanced or margin-positive disease following RNU, significantly reduced locoregional recurrence risk OR 0.43 (95% CI: 0.23-0.70), and the effect remained significant even following subgroup analysis to account for adjuvant systemic therapy. The effect of adjuvant RT on 3-year OS, 5-year CSS and DR was non-significant. However, 5-year OS was unfavourable in the adjuvant RT arm, but study heterogeneity was high, and analysis of small-study effects and subgroups suggested bias in reporting of outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Adjuvant RT in the setting of locally advanced UTUC improves locoregional control following definitive surgery, but does not appear to improve OS. Higher-quality studies, ideally randomized controlled trials, are needed to further quantify its benefit in this setting, and to explore multi-modal treatments that include systemic agents given concomitantly or sequentially with RT, which may offer an OS benefit in addition to the locoregional control benefit of RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Osbert Zalay
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada
| | - Michael Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 2C1, Canada
| | - Samantha Sigurdson
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8V 5C2, Canada
| | - Shawn Malone
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada
| | - Francisco Emilio Vera-Badillo
- Department of Oncology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 5P9, Canada
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen’s Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, ON K7L 2V5, Canada
| | - Aamer Mahmud
- Department of Oncology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 5P9, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Is radiotherapy helpful for the prognosis of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma? A meta-analysis. Urol Oncol 2022; 40:424-433. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.06.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Revised: 05/31/2022] [Accepted: 06/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
5
|
Li X, Li H, Gao XS, Fang D, Qin S, Zhang Z, Zhou L, Li X, Wang D. Effectiveness of adjuvant radiotherapy for high recurrence risk patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Urol Oncol 2022; 40:410.e1-410.e10. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Revised: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
6
|
Chen TS, Chen YT, Wang HJ, Chiang PH, Yang WC, Lee WC, Chuang YC, Cheng YT, Kang CH, Lee WC, Chen CH, Shen YC, Liu YY, Liu HY, Chang YL, Su YL, Huang CC, Luo HL. The Prognostic Impact of Tumor Location in pT3N0M0 Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Front Oncol 2022; 12:850874. [PMID: 35372015 PMCID: PMC8964942 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.850874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We aimed to evaluate the impact of tumor location on cancer outcomes in patients with pT3N0M0 upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) with bladder cuff excision. Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed 302 patients with pT3N0M0 UTUC who underwent RNU with bladder cuff excision at our institution between 2005 and 2019, including 191 renal pelvis tumors and 111 ureteral tumors. Clinicopathologic characteristics were compared between renal pelvis and ureter urothelial carcinomas. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression was used to assess the association between outcomes and clinical factors. Outcomes of interest included intravesical recurrence-free survival (IVRFS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS), which were measured using the Kaplan-Meier curve with a log-rank test. Results A total of 302 patients underwent RNU with bladder cuff excision. During the median follow-up of 42.7 months, 70 (23.2%), 95 (31.5%), and 99 (32.8%) patients experienced intravesical recurrence, local recurrence, and distant metastasis, respectively. Seventy (23.2%) patients died from UTUC. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that tumor location was an independent predictor of local recurrence (HR = 2.05, p = 0.001), with borderline independent significance in intravesical recurrence (HR = 1.54, p = 0.074) and distant metastasis (HR = 1.45, p = 0.08). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that ureter tumors had a worse 5-year local recurrence (log-rank p < 0.001) and borderline worse 5-year intravesical recurrence (log-rank p = 0.055) and 5-year distant metastasis (log-rank p = 0.073). Conclusion Ureter tumors seem to be associated with worse oncological outcomes, especially with local recurrence in UTUC. Further large and long-term studies are warranted for investigating biological differences based on tumor location.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tzu Shuang Chen
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yen Ta Chen
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Hung Jen Wang
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | | | - Wen Chou Yang
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Wei Ching Lee
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yao Chi Chuang
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yuan Tso Cheng
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chih Hsiung Kang
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Wei Chia Lee
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chien Hsu Chen
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yuan Chi Shen
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yi Yang Liu
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Hui Ying Liu
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yin Lun Chang
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yu Li Su
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chun Chieh Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Hao Lun Luo
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fan B, Huang Y, Wen S, Teng Q, Yang X, Sun M, Chen T, Huang Y, Wang Y, Liu Z. Predictive Value of Preoperative Positive Urine Cytology for Development of Bladder Cancer After Nephroureterectomy in Patients With Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Prognostic Nomogram Based on a Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study and Systematic Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol 2021; 11:731318. [PMID: 34660295 PMCID: PMC8519510 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.731318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UUT-UC) is a rare and severe urinary malignancy. Several studies have explored the relationship between preoperative urine cytology and intravesical recurrence (IVR) in patients with UUT-UC. However, the results of these studies are controversial or even contradictory, and investigations with UUT-UC patients in northeast China are rare. Methods We first estimated the prognostic significance of preoperative urine cytology in the outcomes of intravesical recurrence in 231 UUT-UC patients (training cohort = 142, validation cohort = 89) after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) by the nomogram model. Subsequently, we quantitatively combined our results with the published data after searching several databases to assess whether preoperative positive urine cytology was associated with poor intravesical recurrence-free survival and a high risk of tumor malignant biological behavior. Results Firstly, the multicenter retrospective cohort study demonstrated that preoperative positive urine cytology correlated with poor intravesical recurrence-free survival and can serve as significant independent predictors of IVR by Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analysis. The construction of the nomogram demonstrated that predictive efficacy and accuracy were significantly improved when preoperative urine cytology was combined. Meanwhile, meta-analysis showed that preoperative positive urine cytology was associated with a 49% increased risk of IVR. In the subgroup analysis by region, study type, and sample size, the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) were statistically significant for the Japan subgroup (HR 1.32), China subgroup (HR 1.88), cohort study subgroup (HR 1.45), and the single-arm study subgroup (HR 1.63). Conclusions Preoperative urine cytology was validated as a potential predictor of intravesical recurrence in patients with UUT-UC after RNU, although these results need to be generalized with caution. Large, prospective trials are required to further confirm its significance in prognosis and tumor malignant biological behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo Fan
- Department of Urology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Yuanbin Huang
- Department of Urology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Shuang Wen
- Department of Pathology, Dalian Friendship Hospital, Dalian, China
| | - Qiliang Teng
- Department of Urology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Xinrui Yang
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Man Sun
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Tingyu Chen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Yan Huang
- Department of Urology, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang, China
| | - Yumei Wang
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Zhiyu Liu
- Department of Urology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Khriguian J, Patrocinio H, Andonian S, Aprikian A, Kassouf W, Tanguay S, Cury FL. Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Pract Radiat Oncol 2021; 12:e34-e39. [PMID: 34530170 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2021.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2021] [Revised: 07/20/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Urothelial carcinomas (UCs), also known as transitional cell carcinomas, account for the majority of upper urinary tract tumors. The gold-standard therapy for operable patients with localized disease is radical nephroureterectomy. However, some patients are not surgical candidates. Data on the use of modern radiation therapy for upper urinary tract UC (UTUC) are scarce. The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of SABR in UTUC. METHODS AND MATERIALS This retrospective study included all patients with UTUC treated with SABR at one institution. Charts were reviewed to evaluate renal function and the development of toxicity using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0. Tumor response on follow-up imaging with computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scans was assessed using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. RESULTS A total of 16 patients (7 patients with UC at the ureter and 9 at the renal pelvis) were identified as treated with SABR. Of the 9 patients with renal pelvis UC, 4 had a previous history of bladder cancer. At the time of treatment, the median age was 85 years (range, 67-95 years). Most patients received 40 Gy in 8 fractions every second day. The median followup was 21 months (range, 3-110 months). Most patients maintained stable renal function, and only 2 patients developed worsening chronic kidney disease, but none required dialysis. Acutely, 4 patients developed grade 1 diarrhea, and 1 patient had new grade 1 hematuria. No chronic side effects were observed. One patient did not have follow-up imaging and was excluded from the tumor-response analysis. Two patients had a complete response of the treated lesion, 9 had a partial response, 2 had stable disease, and 2 had disease progression within the treatment field. CONCLUSIONS This small case series suggests that SABR for UTUC is safe and well-tolerated, with good radiographic tumor response to ablative doses of radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Khriguian
- McGill University Health Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Horacio Patrocinio
- McGill University Health Center, Department of Medical Physics, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Sero Andonian
- McGill University Health Center, Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Armen Aprikian
- McGill University Health Center, Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Wassim Kassouf
- McGill University Health Center, Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Simon Tanguay
- McGill University Health Center, Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Fabio L Cury
- McGill University Health Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Liu MZ, Gao XS, Qin SB, Li XY, Ma MW, Xie M, Lyu F, Wang D. Radiation therapy for nonmetastatic medically inoperable upper-tract urothelial carcinoma. Transl Androl Urol 2021; 10:2929-2937. [PMID: 34430395 PMCID: PMC8350229 DOI: 10.21037/tau-21-291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The standard management for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). However, some patients cannot undergo this procedure for several reasons, such as unresectable disease, old age, and multiple comorbidities. Our study explored the potential safety and effectiveness of radiotherapy as a curative treatment for UTUC patients unfit for surgery. Methods The data of patients treated with radiotherapy between December 2017 and November 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. For the literature review, computerized PubMed Medline, Index Medicus, and Web of Science databases and reference lists from the identified publications of interest were used. And “upper-tract urothelial carcinoma” and “radiotherapy” were used as key words in the search. Results We describe 8 patients with UTUC who were treated with radiotherapy. The median follow-up time was 13.5 months (range, 8.6–30.9 months). Local tumor control was achieved in all patients. However, distant metastases were observed in 2 patients with T3-4/N+ status. One patient had T4 status and the other had N2+ status. The patients died of tumor progression at 15.0 and 17.7 months. In addition, the other 6 patients who were still alive had relatively early-stage tumors without nodal involvement. Regarding acute toxicity, according to the CTCAE v5.0, mild side effects were noted, including grade 1 nausea and diarrhea. Four patients developed mild anemia, generally of grade 1–2. One patient experienced grade 3 anemia, but it was manageable and improved with symptomatic support. In addition, no grade 4 acute or late toxicities were observed. No significant long-term impairment of renal function occurred. Conclusions For patients with nonmetastatic UTUC who are not suitable for surgery, radiotherapy is a safe treatment and can achieve good local tumor control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming-Zhu Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Xian-Shu Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Shang-Bin Qin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiao-Ying Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Ming-Wei Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Mu Xie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Feng Lyu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Dian Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gao RW, Tollefson MK, Thompson RH, Potretzke AM, Quevedo FJ, Choo R, Davis BJ, Pisansky TM, Harmsen WS, Stish BJ. Predictors of Locoregional Recurrence and Delineation of Adjuvant Radiation Therapy Fields for Patients With Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Receiving Nephroureterectomy. Pract Radiat Oncol 2021; 11:e468-e476. [PMID: 33636378 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2021.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Revised: 02/10/2021] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To identify factors predictive of locoregional recurrence (LRR) in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with nephroureterectomy and to propose adjuvant radiation therapy (ART) fields. METHODS AND MATERIALS Clinical and pathologic variables for patients receiving nephroureterectomy for UTUC between 1995 and 2009 were analyzed for associations with outcomes. Sites of LRR from all patients with available imaging (39) were contoured on computed tomography image sets of patients with representative anatomy, and ART fields were proposed based on these distributions. RESULTS A total of 279 patients with a median follow-up of 13.0 years were analyzed. The 5-year cumulative incidence of LRR was 16.7% (95% CI, 12.2-21). Pathologic risk factors (PRFs) associated with increased risk of LRR included tumor in both the renal pelvis and ureter, T stage ≥2, lymph node involvement, grade 3 histology, and positive surgical margins (P < .05). Patients with an increased number of PRFs had a significantly greater risk of LRR. The 5-year cumulative incidence estimates of LRR were 5.3% (95% CI, 1.8%-16.0%), 15.6% (95% CI, 9.5%-25.7%), and 43.9% (95% CI, 31.1%-62.1%) for those with 1, 2, and ≥3 PRFs, respectively. ART fields covering the renal fossa and retroperitoneal lymph nodes from the superior border of L1 through the aortic bifurcation would encompass all sites of LRR for 33 of 46 patients (72%). Non-LRR bladder and distant failure occurred in 101 (36.2%) and 73 (26.2%) of the patients, respectively. The 5-year cumulative incidence estimate of distant failure was 22.5% (95% CI, 17.4%-27.3%). CONCLUSIONS In patients receiving nephroureterectomy for UTUC, LRR is significantly increased in patients with 2 or more PRFs. These data provide clinically valuable insight into the selection of candidates for ART and the design of ART fields.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert W Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | | | | | | | - Richard Choo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Brian J Davis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - W Scott Harmsen
- Department of Biostatistics & Information, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Bradley J Stish
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Leow JJ, Chong YL, Chang SL, Valderrama BP, Powles T, Bellmunt J. Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A 2020 Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, and Future Perspectives on Systemic Therapy. Eur Urol 2020; 79:635-654. [PMID: 32798146 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 103] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2020] [Accepted: 07/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT To improve the prognosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), clinicians have used neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) or adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) before or after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Despite some new data, the evidence remains mixed on their efficacy. OBJECTIVE To update the current evidence on the role of NAC and AC for UTUC. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We searched for all studies investigating NAC or AC for UTUC in Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology meetings up to February 2020. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS For NAC, the pooled pathologic complete response rate (≤ypT0N0M0) was 11% (n = 811) and pathologic partial response rate (≤ypT1N0M0) was 43% (n = 869), both across 14 studies. Across six studies, the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) were 0.44 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.32-0.59, p < 0.001) for overall survival (OS) and 0.38 (95% CI: 0.24-0.61, p < 0.001) for cancer-specific survival (CSS) in favor of NAC. The evidence for NAC is at best level 2. As for AC, there was a benefit in OS (pooled HR 0.77; 95% CI: 0.64-0.92, p = 0.004 across 14 studies and 7983 patients), CSS (pooled HR 0.79; 95% CI: 0.69-0.91, p = 0.001 across 18 studies and 5659 patients), and disease-free survival (DFS; pooled HR 0.52; 95% CI: 0.38-0.70 across four studies and 602 patients). While most studies were retrospective (level 2 evidence), there were two prospective randomized trials providing level 1 evidence. There are currently four phase 2 trials on neoadjuvant immunotherapy and three phase 2 trials on adjuvant immunotherapy for UTUC. CONCLUSIONS NAC for UTUC confers a favorable pathologic response and tumor downstaging rate, and an OS and CSS benefit compared with RNU alone. AC confers an OS, CSS, and DFS benefit compared with RNU alone. Currently, the evidence for AC appears stronger (with positive level 1 evidence) than that for NAC (at best level 2 evidence). Limited data are available for chemoimmunotherapy approaches, but preliminary data support an active research investment. PATIENT SUMMARY After a comprehensive search of the latest studies examining the role of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy for upper tract urothelial cancer, the pooled evidence shows that perioperative chemotherapy was beneficial for prolonging survival; however, the evidence for adjuvant chemotherapy was stronger than that for neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey J Leow
- Department of Urology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore; Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore; Division of Urology and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yew Lam Chong
- Department of Urology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore; Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| | - Steven L Chang
- Division of Urology and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Begoña P Valderrama
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Thomas Powles
- Barts Cancer Institute, Barts Health and the Royal Free NHS Trusts, London, UK
| | - Joaquim Bellmunt
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and PSMAR-IMIM Research Lab, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Li X, Cui M, Gu X, Fang D, Li H, Qin S, Yang K, Zhu T, Li X, Zhou L, Gao XS, Wang D. Pattern and risk factors of local recurrence after nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. World J Surg Oncol 2020; 18:114. [PMID: 32473636 PMCID: PMC7261378 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-020-01877-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2019] [Accepted: 05/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study aims to identify predictive local recurrence risk factors and site-specific local recurrence pattern of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) with different primary tumor locations. Methods Three hundred and eighty-nine UTUC patients with radical nephroureterectomy were included in this study. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regressions were performed to measure the risk of local recurrence. We also mapped the position of local recurrence sites stratified by primary tumor locations. Results A total of 73 patients (18.7%) developed local recurrence within a median follow-up of 41 months (range, 3-80 months). For patients with local recurrence, the median interval of local recurrence was 9 months. Ureter tumor, multifocality, T stage, G grade, lymph node metastasis (LNM), lymph node dissection (LND), and lymph vascular invasion (LVI) were all significantly associated with increased local recurrence by univariable analyses (P < 0.05). Only multifocality, T3–4, G3, and LNM remained independent predictors of increased local recurrence by multivariable analyses. Adjuvant radiotherapy could reduce the local recurrence (HR = 0.177; 95% CI 0.064-0.493, P = 0.001). Patients with local recurrence had poorer cancer-specific survival (4-year cancer-specific survival rate 36 ± 7.5% vs 88.4 ± 2.2%, P = 0.000). We evaluated local recurrence pattern stratified by tumor locations. Para-aortic lymph node region was the most common recurrence area for all the patients. Left-sided UTUC had more than 70% recurrent lymph nodes in the left para-aortic region (LPA). For right-sided UTUC patients, recurrent para-aortic lymph nodes distributed in the LPA (33.3%), aortocaval (AC) (41.5%), and right paracaval (RPC) (25.2%) regions. Recurrence in the internal and external iliac regions was only found in the distal ureter group (P < 0.05). Renal pelvic fossa recurrence was only found in renal pelvic tumor (22.2%, P = 0.007). The ureter tumor bed recurrence rate was higher for ureter patients (P = 0.001). Conclusions Multifocality, T3–4, G3, and LNM are predictors of higher local recurrence rate of UTUC. Adjuvant radiotherapy can reduce local recurrence rate. Local recurrence patterns are different according to primary tumor locations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoying Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Ming Cui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaobin Gu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Dong Fang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Hongzhen Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Shangbin Qin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Kunlin Yang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Tianzhao Zhu
- Department of Medical Imaging, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xuesong Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Liqun Zhou
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.
| | - Xian-Shu Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.
| | - Dian Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center , Chicago, USA
| |
Collapse
|