1
|
Bilski M, Konat-Bąska K, Zerella MA, Corradini S, Hetnał M, Leonardi MC, Gruba M, Grzywacz A, Hatala P, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Fijuth J, Kuncman Ł. Advances in breast cancer treatment: a systematic review of preoperative stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for breast cancer. Radiat Oncol 2024; 19:103. [PMID: 39095859 PMCID: PMC11295558 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-024-02497-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2024] [Accepted: 07/26/2024] [Indexed: 08/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Breast conserving treatment typically involves surgical excision of tumor and adjuvant radiotherapy targeting the breast area or tumor bed. Accurately defining the tumor bed is challenging and lead to irradiation of greater volume of healthy tissues. Preoperative stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) which target tumor may solves that issues. We conducted a systematic literature review to evaluates the early toxicity and cosmetic outcomes of this promising treatment approach. Secondary we reviewed pathological complete response (pCR) rates, late toxicity, patient selection criteria and radiotherapy protocols. We retrieved literature from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, ScienceDirect, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The study adhered to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Ten prospective clinical trials (7 phase II, 3 phase I), encompassing 188 patients (aged 18-75 years, cT1-T3 cN0-N3 cM0, primarily with ER/PgR-positive, HER2-negative status,), were analyzed. Median follow-up was 15 months (range 3-30). Treatment involved single-fraction SBRT (15-21Gy) in five studies and fractionated (19.5-31.5Gy in 3 fractions) in the rest. Time interval from SBRT to surgery was 9.5 weeks (range 1-28). Acute and late G2 toxicity occurred in 0-17% and 0-19% of patients, respectively, G3 toxicity was rarely observed. The cosmetic outcome was excellent in 85-100%, fair in 0-10% and poor in only 1 patient. pCR varied, showing higher rates (up to 42%) with longer intervals between SBRT and surgery and when combined with neoadjuvant systemic therapy (up to 90%). Preoperative SBRT significantly reduce overall treatment time, enabling to minimalize volumes. Early results indicate excellent cosmetic effects and low toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mateusz Bilski
- Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
- Department of Brachytherapy, Lublin Cancer Center, Lublin, Poland
- Department of Radiotherapy, Lublin Cancer Center, Lublin, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Konat-Bąska
- Department of Brachytherapy, Lower Silesian Oncology Pulmonology and Hematology Center, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Maria Alessia Zerella
- Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marcin Hetnał
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University, Kraków, Poland
- Amethyst Radiotherapy Centre, Ludwik Rydygier Memorial Hospital, Kraków, Poland
| | | | - Martyna Gruba
- Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
| | | | - Patrycja Hatala
- Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Jacek Fijuth
- Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
- Department of External Beam Radiotherapy, Copernicus Memorial Hospital in Lodz Comprehensive Cancer Center and Traumatology, Pabianicka 62, 93-513, Lodz, Poland
| | - Łukasz Kuncman
- Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.
- Department of External Beam Radiotherapy, Copernicus Memorial Hospital in Lodz Comprehensive Cancer Center and Traumatology, Pabianicka 62, 93-513, Lodz, Poland.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yuan J, Zhang M, Wang M, Zhang M, Wu K, Chen H. Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy is safe and feasible for breast conserving surgery or immediate reconstruction. Sci Rep 2024; 14:9208. [PMID: 38649431 PMCID: PMC11035569 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-59961-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the survival outcomes of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (NARCT) for early breast cancer. Female patients ≤ 80 years old with unilateral T1-T4 invasive ductal breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and radiation therapy (RT) between 2006 and 2015 were enrolled from SEER database. Baseline differences in clinical and pathological characteristics were evaluated using chi-square test. The survival outcomes were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared using Cox hazards models. The effects of baseline differences on survival outcome in patients treated with neoadjuvant radiation therapy (NART) and post-operation radiation therapy (PORT) were circumvented by propensity score matching (PSM). Altogether 14,151 patients receiving NAC and RT were enrolled, among whom 386 underwent NART. Based on a 1:4 PSM cohort, NART was an independent unfavorable prognostic factor for breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) for the whole cohort. However, among patients receiving breast conserving surgery (BCS) (HR 1.029, P = 0.915 for BCSS; HR 1.003, P = 0.990 for OS) or implant-based immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) (HR 1.039, P = 0.921 for BCSS; HR 1.153, P = 0.697 for OS), those treated with NART had similar survival outcomes compared with patients treated with PORT. In conclusion, NARCT was a safe and feasible approach for patients undergoing BCS and IBR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingjing Yuan
- Department of Breast Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, 200011, China
| | - Meilin Zhang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, 200011, China
| | - Maoli Wang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, 200011, China
| | - Mingdi Zhang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, 200011, China
| | - Kejin Wu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, 200011, China
| | - Hongliang Chen
- Department of Breast Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, 200011, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kong X, Song J, Gao P, Gao R, Zhang L, Fang Y, Wang Y, Gao J, Wang J. Revolutionizing the battle against locally advanced breast cancer: A comprehensive insight into neoadjuvant radiotherapy. Med Res Rev 2024; 44:606-631. [PMID: 37947371 DOI: 10.1002/med.21998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2022] [Revised: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 10/29/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) constitutes one of the most pervasive malignancies affecting the female population. Despite progressive improvements in diagnostic and therapeutic technologies, leading to an increased detection of early stage BCs, locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) persists as a significant clinical challenge. Owing to its poor overall survival (OS) rate, elevated recurrence rate, and high potential for distant metastasis, LABC prominently impacts the comprehensive efficacy of BC treatments. Radiotherapy, encompassing preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative modalities, is acknowledged as an effective strategy for mitigating BC metastasis and enhancing survival rates among patients. Nevertheless, the domain of preoperative neoadjuvant radiotherapy (NART) remains conspicuously underexplored in clinical studies. Available research suggests that NART can induce tumor volume reduction, provoke fibrotic changes in tumor and adjacent normal tissues, thereby mitigating intraoperative cancer propagation and enhancing the quality of life for LABC patients. This manuscript seeks to provide a review of contemporary research pertaining to LABC and its preoperative radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiangyi Kong
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China
| | - Jiarui Song
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China
| | - Peng Gao
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Department of Breast Surgery, Clinical Research Center for Breast, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Ran Gao
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Lin Zhang
- Suzhou Industrial Park Monash Research Institute of Science and Technology, Suzhou, China
- The School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Yi Fang
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yipeng Wang
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jidong Gao
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China
| | - Jing Wang
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Song D, Zhang H, Ren C, Zhan N, Xie L, Xie W. Accelerated partial breast irradiation: Current evidence and future developments. CANCER INNOVATION 2024; 3:e106. [PMID: 38948534 PMCID: PMC11212331 DOI: 10.1002/cai2.106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Revised: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/02/2024]
Abstract
Whole breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery for early breast cancer has become one of the standard treatment modes for breast cancer and yields the same effect as radical surgery. Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) as a substitute for whole breast irradiation for patients with early breast cancer is a hot spot in clinical research. APBI is characterised by simple high-dose local irradiation of the tumour bed in a short time, thus improving convenience for patients and saving costs. The implementation methods of APBI mainly include brachytherapy, external beam radiation therapy, and intraoperative radiotherapy. This review provides an overview of the clinical effects and adverse reactions of the main technologies of APBI and discusses the prospects for the future development of APBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dandan Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen University, Cancer Research Center, School of MedicineXiamen UniversityXiang'anXiamenChina
| | - Honghong Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen University, Cancer Research Center, School of MedicineXiamen UniversityXiang'anXiamenChina
| | - Chengbo Ren
- Department of Radiation OncologyThe First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North UniversityZhangjiakouHebeiChina
| | - Ning Zhan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen University, Cancer Research Center, School of MedicineXiamen UniversityXiang'anXiamenChina
| | - Liangxi Xie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen University, Cancer Research Center, School of MedicineXiamen UniversityXiang'anXiamenChina
| | - Wenjia Xie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen University, Cancer Research Center, School of MedicineXiamen UniversityXiang'anXiamenChina
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zerella MA, Zaffaroni M, Ronci G, Dicuonzo S, Rojas DP, Morra A, Gerardi MA, Fodor C, Rondi E, Vigorito S, Penco S, Sargenti M, Baratella P, Vicini E, Morigi C, Kahler-Ribeiro-Fontana S, Galimberti VE, Gandini S, De Camilli E, Renne G, Cattani F, Veronesi P, Orecchia R, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Leonardi MC. A narrative review for radiation oncologists to implement preoperative partial breast irradiation. LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA 2023; 128:1553-1570. [PMID: 37650981 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-023-01706-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
The strategy to anticipate radiotherapy (RT) before surgery, for breast cancer (BC) treatment, has recently generated a renewed interest. Historically, preoperative RT has remained confined either to highly selected patients, in the context of personalized therapy, or to clinical research protocols. Nevertheless, in the recent years, thanks to technological advances and increased tumor biology understanding, RT has undergone great changes that have also impacted the preoperative settings, embracing the modern approach to breast cancer. In particular, the reappraisal of preoperative RT can be viewed within the broader view of personalized and tailored medicine. In fact, preoperative accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) allows a more precise target delineation, with less variability in contouring among radiation oncologists, and a smaller treatment volume, possibly leading to lower toxicity and to dose escalation programs. The aim of the present review, which represents a benchmark study for the AIRC IG-23118, is to report available data on different technical aspects of preoperative RT including dosimetric studies, patient's selection and set-up, constraints, target delineation and clinical results. These data, along with the ones that will become available from ongoing studies, may inform the design of the future trials and representing a step toward a tailored APBI approach with the potential to challenge the current treatment paradigm in early-stage BC.Trial registration: The study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04679454).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Alessia Zerella
- Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Mattia Zaffaroni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Ronci
- Unit of Medical Physics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Samantha Dicuonzo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Damaris Patricia Rojas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Morra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Cristiana Fodor
- Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Rondi
- Unit of Medical Physics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Sabrina Vigorito
- Unit of Medical Physics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Penco
- Division of Breast Radiology, IRCSS, IEO European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Manuela Sargenti
- Division of Breast Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Baratella
- Division of Breast Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisa Vicini
- Division of Breast Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Consuelo Morigi
- Division of Breast Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Sara Gandini
- Department of Experimental Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisa De Camilli
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Renne
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Cattani
- Unit of Medical Physics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Veronesi
- Division of Breast Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Directorate, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Cristina Leonardi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Civil YA, Jonker LW, Groot Koerkamp MPM, Duvivier KM, de Vries R, Oei AL, Slotman BJ, van der Velde S, van den Bongard HJGD. Preoperative Partial Breast Irradiation in Patients with Low-Risk Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review of Literature. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:3263-3279. [PMID: 36869253 PMCID: PMC10175515 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13233-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/29/2023] [Indexed: 03/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preoperative instead of standard postoperative partial breast irradiation (PBI) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) has the advantage of reducing the irradiated breast volume, toxicity, and number of radiotherapy sessions and can allow tumor downstaging. In this review, we assessed tumor response and clinical outcomes after preoperative PBI. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a systematic review of studies on preoperative PBI in patients with low-risk breast cancer using the databases Ovid Medline, Embase.com, Web of Science (Core Collection), and Scopus (PROSPERO registration CRD42022301435). References of eligible manuscripts were checked for other relevant manuscripts. The primary outcome measure was pathologic complete response (pCR). RESULTS A total of eight prospective and one retrospective cohort study were identified (n = 359). In up to 42% of the patients, pCR was obtained and this increased after a longer interval between radiotherapy and BCS (0.5-8 months). After a maximum median follow-up of 5.0 years, three studies on external beam radiotherapy reported low local recurrence rates (0-3%) and overall survival of 97-100%. Acute toxicity consisted mainly of grade 1 skin toxicity (0-34%) and seroma (0-31%). Late toxicity was predominantly fibrosis grade 1 (46-100%) and grade 2 (10-11%). Cosmetic outcome was good to excellent in 78-100% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS Preoperative PBI showed a higher pCR rate after a longer interval between radiotherapy and BCS. Mild late toxicity and good oncological and cosmetic outcomes were reported. In the ongoing ABLATIVE-2 trial, BCS is performed at a longer interval of 12 months after preoperative PBI aiming to achieve a higher pCR rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasmin A Civil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Lysanne W Jonker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maartje P M Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Katya M Duvivier
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ralph de Vries
- Medical Library, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arlene L Oei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Center for Experimental Molecular Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology and Immunology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Berend J Slotman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Susanne van der Velde
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H J G Desirée van den Bongard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology and Immunology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Civil YA, Oei AL, Duvivier KM, Bijker N, Meijnen P, Donkers L, Verheijen S, van Kesteren Z, Palacios MA, Schijf LJ, Barbé E, Konings IRHM, -van der Houven van Oordt CWM, Westhoff PG, Meijer HJM, Diepenhorst GMP, Thijssen V, Mouliere F, Slotman BJ, van der Velde S, van den Bongard HJGD. Prediction of pathologic complete response after single-dose MR-guided partial breast irradiation in low-risk breast cancer patients: the ABLATIVE-2 trial-a study protocol. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:419. [PMID: 37161377 PMCID: PMC10169374 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-10910-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Partial breast irradiation (PBI) is standard of care in low-risk breast cancer patients after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Pre-operative PBI can result in tumor downstaging and more precise target definition possibly resulting in less treatment-related toxicity. This study aims to assess the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate one year after MR-guided single-dose pre-operative PBI in low-risk breast cancer patients. METHODS The ABLATIVE-2 trial is a multicenter prospective single-arm trial using single-dose ablative PBI in low-risk breast cancer patients. Patients ≥ 50 years with non-lobular invasive breast cancer ≤ 2 cm, grade 1 or 2, estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, and tumor-negative sentinel node procedure are eligible. A total of 100 patients will be enrolled. PBI treatment planning will be performed using a radiotherapy planning CT and -MRI in treatment position. The treatment delivery will take place on a conventional or MR-guided linear accelerator. The prescribed radiotherapy dose is a single dose of 20 Gy to the tumor, and 15 Gy to the 2 cm of breast tissue surrounding the tumor. Follow-up MRIs, scheduled at baseline, 2 weeks, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after PBI, are combined with liquid biopsies to identify biomarkers for pCR prediction. BCS will be performed 12 months after radiotherapy or after 6 months, if MRI does not show a radiologic complete response. The primary endpoint is the pCR rate after PBI. Secondary endpoints are radiologic response, toxicity, quality of life, cosmetic outcome, patient distress, oncological outcomes, and the evaluation of biomarkers in liquid biopsies and tumor tissue. Patients will be followed up to 10 years after radiation therapy. DISCUSSION This trial will investigate the pathological tumor response after pre-operative single-dose PBI after 12 months in patients with low-risk breast cancer. In comparison with previous trial outcomes, a longer interval between PBI and BCS of 12 months is expected to increase the pCR rate of 42% after 6-8 months. In addition, response monitoring using MRI and biomarkers will help to predict pCR. Accurate pCR prediction will allow omission of surgery in future patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION The trial was registered prospectively on April 28th 2022 at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05350722).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasmin A. Civil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arlene L. Oei
- Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology (LEXOR), Center for Experimental Molecular Medicine (CEMM), Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology and Immunology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Universiteit van Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Katya M. Duvivier
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nina Bijker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Philip Meijnen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lorraine Donkers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sonja Verheijen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Zdenko van Kesteren
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Miguel A. Palacios
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Laura J. Schijf
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ellis Barbé
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Inge R. H. M. Konings
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C. Willemien Menke -van der Houven van Oordt
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Paulien G. Westhoff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Hanneke J. M. Meijer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Gwen M. P. Diepenhorst
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Victor Thijssen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology (LEXOR), Center for Experimental Molecular Medicine (CEMM), Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology and Immunology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Florent Mouliere
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology and Immunology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Berend J. Slotman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Susanne van der Velde
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H. J. G. Desirée van den Bongard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology and Immunology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
To NH, Gabelle-Flandin I, Luong TMH, Loganadane G, Ouidir N, Boukhobza C, Grellier N, Verry C, Thiolat A, Cohen JL, Radosevic-Robin N, Belkacemi Y. Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Sequential Chemoradiation Therapy in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer: Preliminary, Translational Results from the French Neo-APBI-01 Trial. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15072030. [PMID: 37046691 PMCID: PMC10092968 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15072030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Revised: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Radiation therapy (RT), a novel approach to boost the anticancer immune response, has been progressively evaluated in the neoadjuvant setting in breast cancer (BC). Purpose: We aimed to evaluate immunity-related indicators of response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (NACRT) in BC for better treatment personalization. Patients and Methods: We analyzed data of the first 42 patients included in the randomized phase 2 Neo-APBI-01 trial comparing standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and NACRT regimen in locally advanced triple-negative (TN) and luminal B (LB) subtype BC. Clinicopathological parameters, blood counts and the derived parameters, total tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and their subpopulation, as well as TP53 mutation status, were assessed as predictors of response. Results: Twenty-one patients were equally assigned to each group. The pathologic complete response (pCR) was 33% and 38% in the NACT and NACRT groups, respectively, with a dose-response effect. Only one LB tumor reached pCR after NACRT. Numerous parameters associated with response were identified, which differed according to the assigned treatment. In the NACRT group, baseline hemoglobin of ≥13 g/dL and body mass index of <26 were strongly associated with pCR. Higher baseline neutrophils-to-lymphocytes ratio, total TILs, and T-effector cell counts were favorable for pCR. Conclusion: This preliminary analysis identified LB and low-TIL tumors as poor responders to the NACRT protocol, which delivered RT after several cycles of chemotherapy. These findings will allow for amending the selection of patients for the trial and help better design future trials of NACRT in BC.
Collapse
|
9
|
Thorpe CS, DeWees TA, Laughlin BS, Vallow LA, Seneviratne D, Pockaj BA, Cronin PA, Halyard MY, Vern-Gross TZ, McGee LA, McLaughlin SA, Voss MM, Golafshar MA, Bulman GF, Vargas CE. Pilot/Phase II Trial of Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy to the Whole Breast Alone Before Breast Conserving Surgery. Adv Radiat Oncol 2023; 8:101111. [PMID: 36483068 PMCID: PMC9723298 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.101111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Our purpose was to report the results of a phase II trial of patients with breast cancer treated with hypofractionated whole breast radiation therapy (RT) before breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Methods and materials Between 2019 and 2020, patients with cT0-T2, N0, M0 breast cancer were enrolled. Patients were treated with hypofractionated whole breast RT, 25 Gy in 5 fractions, 4 to 8 weeks before BCS. Pathologic assessment was performed using the residual cancer burden (RCB). Toxicities were assessed according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4). Quality of life was assessed with Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, The Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale, Linear Analogue Self-Assessment, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System. Results Twenty-two patients were enrolled. Median follow-up was 7.6 months (range, 0.2-16.8). Seven (32%) and 2 (9%) patients experienced grade 2+ or 3 toxicities, respectively. Overall quality of life Linear Analogue Self-Assessment and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System did not change significantly from baseline (P = .21 and P = .72, respectively). There was no clinically significant change (≥1 point) in any of The Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale domains. Only 1 (5%) patient experienced a clinical deterioration that corresponded to a "fair" outcome on the Harvard Cosmesis Scale. At pathologic evaluation, 14 (64%) patients had RCB-0 or RCB-I, including 3 (14%) patients with a pathologic complete response (RCB-0). Eight patients (36%) had RCB-II. No local or distant recurrences have been observed. Conclusions Extremely hypofractionated whole breast RT before BCS is a feasible approach. There were low rates of toxicities and good cosmesis. Further investigation into this approach with RT before BCS is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Todd A. DeWees
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | | | - Laura A. Vallow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Dee Seneviratne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | | | | | | | | | - Lisa A. McGee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | | - Molly M. Voss
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Meattini I, Kim K, Livi L. Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation: Florence Phase 3 Trial Experience and Future Perspectives. Am J Clin Oncol 2023; 46:10-15. [PMID: 36472353 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Accelerated partial breast irradiation Florence phase 3 trial is a single-center study comparing intensity-modulated based accelerated partial breast irradiation (PBI, 30 Gy in 5 fractions) and whole breast irradiation (50 Gy in 25 fractions) followed by a tumor bed boost (10 Gy in 5 fractions). This easy-to-deliver PBI approach showed excellent long-term disease control with favorable safety and cosmetic outcome profiles. A plateau has been probably reached concerning the reduction of the number of fractions in the postoperative PBI setting. A 5-fraction schedule is the standard regimen and probably the appropriate compromise in terms of efficacy, safety, and quality of life, also considering the negative results of most intraoperative single-fraction PBI trials. A new frontier is now open on the potential benefit of preoperative PBI delivery, although concerns remain on the optimal dose, fractionation, and technique. Hereby we report the accelerated PBI Florence phase 3 trial experience and future perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Icro Meattini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio," University of Florence
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Kyubo Kim
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio," University of Florence
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Meattini I, Francolini G, Di Cataldo V, Visani L, Becherini C, Scoccimarro E, Salvestrini V, Bellini C, Masi L, Doro R, Di Naro F, Loi M, Salvatore G, Simontacchi G, Greto D, Bernini M, Nori J, Orzalesi L, Bianchi S, Mangoni M, Livi L. Preoperative robotic radiosurgery for early breast cancer: Results of the phase II ROCK trial (NCT03520894). Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2022; 37:94-100. [PMID: 36177053 PMCID: PMC9513617 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 09/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Preoperative partial breast irradiation treats well-defined target. Stereotactic body radiation therapy have been routinely implemented in clinical practice. No acute toxicity greater than grade 2 was recorded. A single 21 Gy dose preoperative robotic radiosurgery represents a feasible technique.
Background and purpose Preoperative partial breast irradiation (PBI) has got the advantage of treating a well-defined target. We report the results of the phase II ROCK trial (NCT03520894), enrolling early breast cancer (BC) patients treated with preoperative robotic radiosurgery (prRS), in terms of acute and early late toxicity, disease control, and cosmesis. Material and methods The study recruited between 2018 and 2021 at our Radiation Oncology Unit. Eligible patients were 50 + years old BC, hormonal receptors positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HR+/HER2-), sized up to 25 mm. The study aimed to prospectively assess the toxicity and feasibility of a robotic single 21 Gy-fraction prRS in preoperative setting. Results A total of 70 patients were recruited and 22 patients were successfully treated with pRS. Overall, three G1 adverse events (13.6 %) were recorded within 7 days from prRS. Three events (13.6 %) were recorded between 7 and 30 days, one G2 breast oedema and two G1 breast pain. No acute toxicity greater than G2 was recorded. Five patients experienced early late G1 toxicity. One patient reported G2 breast induration. No early late toxicity greater than G2 was observed. At a median follow up of 18 months (range 6–29.8), cosmetic results were scored excellent/good and fair in 14 and 5 patients, respectively, while 3 patients experienced a poor cosmetic outcome. Conclusions ROCK trial showed that a single 21 Gy dose prRS represents a feasible technique for selected patients affected by early BC, showing an acceptable preliminary toxicity profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Icro Meattini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Giulio Francolini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Vanessa Di Cataldo
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Luca Visani
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.,CyberKnife Center, Istituto Fiorentino di Cura e Assistenza (IFCA), Florence, Italy
| | - Carlotta Becherini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Erika Scoccimarro
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Viola Salvestrini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.,CyberKnife Center, Istituto Fiorentino di Cura e Assistenza (IFCA), Florence, Italy
| | - Chiara Bellini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Laura Masi
- CyberKnife Center, Istituto Fiorentino di Cura e Assistenza (IFCA), Florence, Italy
| | - Raffaela Doro
- CyberKnife Center, Istituto Fiorentino di Cura e Assistenza (IFCA), Florence, Italy
| | - Federica Di Naro
- Diagnostic Senology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Mauro Loi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Giulia Salvatore
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Gabriele Simontacchi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Daniela Greto
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Marco Bernini
- Breast Surgery Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Jacopo Nori
- Diagnostic Senology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Orzalesi
- Breast Surgery Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Simonetta Bianchi
- Division of Pathological Anatomy, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Monica Mangoni
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Liu Y, Jia M, Wu C, Zhang H, Chen C, Ge W, Wan K, Lan Y, Liu S, Li Y, Fang M, He J, Pan HL, Si JQ, Li M. Transcriptomic Profiling in Mice With CB1 receptor Deletion in Primary Sensory Neurons Suggests New Analgesic Targets for Neuropathic Pain. Front Pharmacol 2022; 12:781237. [PMID: 35046811 PMCID: PMC8762320 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.781237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Type 1 and type 2 cannabinoid receptors (CB1 and CB2, respectively) mediate cannabinoid-induced analgesia. Loss of endogenous CB1 is associated with hyperalgesia. However, the downstream targets affected by ablation of CB1 in primary sensory neurons remain unknown. In the present study, we hypothesized that conditional knockout of CB1 in primary sensory neurons (CB1cKO) alters downstream gene expression in the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) and that targeting these pathways alleviates neuropathic pain. We found that CB1cKO in primary sensory neurons induced by tamoxifen in adult Advillin-Cre:CB1-floxed mice showed persistent hyperalgesia. Transcriptome/RNA sequencing analysis of the DRG indicated that differentially expressed genes were enriched in energy regulation and complement and coagulation cascades at the early phase of CB1cKO, whereas pain regulation and nerve conduction pathways were affected at the late phase of CB1cKO. Chronic constriction injury in mice induced neuropathic pain and changed transcriptome expression in the DRG of CB1cKO mice, and differentially expressed genes were mainly associated with inflammatory and immune-related pathways. Nerve injury caused a much larger increase in CB2 expression in the DRG in CB1cKO than in wildtype mice. Interfering with downstream target genes of CB1, such as antagonizing CB2, inhibited activation of astrocytes, reduced neuroinflammation, and alleviated neuropathic pain. Our results demonstrate that CB1 in primary sensory neurons functions as an endogenous analgesic mediator. CB2 expression is regulated by CB1 and may be targeted for the treatment of neuropathic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yongmin Liu
- Department of Neurobiology, School of Basic Medicine, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.,Department of Pathophysiology, Medical College of Shihezi University, Shihezi, China
| | - Min Jia
- Clinical Laboratories, Wuhan First Hospital, Wuhan, China
| | - Caihua Wu
- Department of Acupuncture, Wuhan First Hospital, Wuhan, China
| | - Hong Zhang
- Department of Neurobiology, School of Basic Medicine, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Chao Chen
- Department of Neurobiology, School of Basic Medicine, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Wenqiang Ge
- Department of Neurobiology, School of Basic Medicine, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Kexing Wan
- Department of Neurobiology, School of Basic Medicine, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Yuye Lan
- Department of Neurobiology, School of Basic Medicine, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Shiya Liu
- Department of Neurobiology, School of Basic Medicine, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Yuanheng Li
- Department of Neurobiology, School of Basic Medicine, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Mengyue Fang
- Department of Neurobiology, School of Basic Medicine, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Jiexi He
- Department of Neurobiology, School of Basic Medicine, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Hui-Lin Pan
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Jun-Qiang Si
- Department of Physiology, Medical College of Shihezi University, Shihezi, China
| | - Man Li
- Department of Neurobiology, School of Basic Medicine, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
A Novel Approach for the Discovery of Biomarkers of Radiotherapy Response in Breast Cancer. J Pers Med 2021; 11:jpm11080796. [PMID: 34442440 PMCID: PMC8399231 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11080796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2021] [Revised: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy (RT) is an important treatment modality for the local control of breast cancer (BC). Unfortunately, not all patients that receive RT will obtain a therapeutic benefit, as cancer cells that either possess intrinsic radioresistance or develop resistance during treatment can reduce its efficacy. For RT treatment regimens to become personalised, there is a need to identify biomarkers that can predict and/or monitor a tumour's response to radiation. Here we describe a novel method to identify such biomarkers. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) was used on conditioned media (CM) samples from a radiosensitive oestrogen receptor positive (ER+) BC cell line (MCF-7) to identify cancer-secreted biomarkers which reflected a response to radiation. A total of 33 radiation-induced secreted proteins that had higher (up to 12-fold) secretion levels at 24 h post-2 Gy radiation were identified. Secretomic results were combined with whole-transcriptome gene expression experiments, using both radiosensitive and radioresistant cells, to identify a signature related to intrinsic radiosensitivity. Gene expression analysis assessing the levels of the 33 proteins showed that 5 (YBX3, EIF4EBP2, DKK1, GNPNAT1 and TK1) had higher expression levels in the radiosensitive cells compared to their radioresistant derivatives; 3 of these proteins (DKK1, GNPNAT1 and TK1) underwent in-lab and initial clinical validation. Western blot analysis using CM samples from cell lines confirmed a significant increase in the release of each candidate biomarker from radiosensitive cells 24 h after treatment with a 2 Gy dose of radiation; no significant increase in secretion was observed in the radioresistant cells after radiation. Immunohistochemistry showed that higher intracellular protein levels of the biomarkers were associated with greater radiosensitivity. Intracellular levels were further assessed in pre-treatment biopsy tissues from patients diagnosed with ER+ BC that were subsequently treated with breast-conserving surgery and RT. High DKK1 and GNPNAT1 intracellular levels were associated with significantly increased recurrence-free survival times, indicating that these two candidate biomarkers have the potential to predict sensitivity to RT. We suggest that the methods highlighted in this study could be utilised for the identification of biomarkers that may have a potential clinical role in personalising and optimising RT dosing regimens, whilst limiting the administration of RT to patients who are unlikely to benefit.
Collapse
|
14
|
Bosma SCJ, van der Leij F, Elkhuizen PHM, Vreeswijk S, Loo CE, Vogel WV, Bartelink H, van de Vijver MJ. Evaluation of Early Response to Preoperative Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (PAPBI) by Histopathology, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and 18F-fluorodexoyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (FDG PET/CT). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 110:1151-1158. [PMID: 33647369 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.02.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2020] [Revised: 02/12/2021] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to find indicators for early response to radiation therapy in breast cancer. These would be of help in tailoring treatment for individual patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS We analyzed 66 patients with low-risk breast cancer (≥60 years; cT1-2pN0) treated within the Preoperative Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (PAPBI) trial. Patients received radiation therapy (RT; 10 x 4 Gray or 5 x 6 Gray), followed by a wide local excision after 6 weeks. Patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 18F-fluorodexoyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) before RT and 5 weeks after RT, before surgery. We assessed the response to PAPBI using a histopathologic assessment and correlated this with responses on MRI and FDG PET/CT. We calculated the positive predictive values (PPVs) of MRI and PET/CT as the number of true positives (complete response on MRI/normalized at visual evaluation on PET/CT and pathologic complete response) divided by the number of patients with a complete response on MRI/normalized at visual evaluation on PET/CT. Similarly, the negative predictive values (NPVs) of MRI and PET/CT were calculated. RESULTS The pathologic response was (nearly) complete in 15 (23%) of the 66 patients and partially complete in 28 (42%). The remaining 23 patients (35%) were nonresponders. The PPV of MRI (Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors [RECIST]) was 87.5% and the NPV was 85%. The PPV and NPV of PET/CT were 25% and 92%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The most accurate method to predict a response and residual disease after preoperative RT in low-risk breast cancer was MRI, using RECIST.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie C J Bosma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Femke van der Leij
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Paula H M Elkhuizen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Vreeswijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Claudette E Loo
- Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter V Vogel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Harry Bartelink
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc J van de Vijver
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam Universitair Medische Centra, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Obeng-Gyasi S, Coles CE, Jones J, Sacks R, Lightowlers S, Bliss JM, Brunt AM, Haviland JS, Kirby AM, Kalinsky K. When the World Throws You a Curve Ball: Lessons Learned in Breast Cancer Management. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2021; 41:1-11. [PMID: 33956493 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_320691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
In the care of patients with operable breast cancer, there has been a shift toward increasing use of neoadjuvant therapy. There are benefits to neoadjuvant therapy, such as monitoring for response, as well as an increased rate of breast conservation and reduction of potential morbidity associated with breast surgery, including axillary management. Among patients with highly proliferative tumors, such as HER2-positive or triple-negative breast cancer, those with residual disease are at higher risk of recurrence, which informs the recommended systemic therapy in the adjuvant setting. For instance, in patients with residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and HER2-targeted therapy, there is a role for adjuvant trastuzumab emtansine for those with residual disease at the time of surgery. The same holds true regarding the role of adjuvant capecitabine in patients with residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. With the added complexities of treating patients in the era of the COVID-19 outbreak, additional considerations are critical, including initiation of surgery within an appropriate time from completion of neoadjuvant therapy. National consensus guidelines on time to surgery must be developed to improve measurement and comparison across systems. In addition, there is emerging radiation treatment management research addressing a number of factors, including hypofractionation, role of proton beam therapy, safe omission of radiotherapy, and preoperative radiotherapy with or without drug combination. In this article, the multidisciplinary approach of treating patients with operable breast cancer is highlighted, with updates and future considerations described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samilia Obeng-Gyasi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Charlotte E Coles
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Jade Jones
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Ruth Sacks
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Sara Lightowlers
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Judith M Bliss
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - A Murray Brunt
- School of Medicine, University of Keele, Keele, United Kingdom
| | - Joanne S Haviland
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Anna M Kirby
- Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden National Health Service Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kevin Kalinsky
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Belkacemi Y, Debbi K, Loganadane G, Ghith S, Hadhri A, Hassani W, Cherif MA, Coraggio G, To NH, Colson-Durand L, Grellier N. [Adjuvant and neoadjuvant radiotherapy in breast cancer: A literaure review and update on the state of the evidence in 2020]. Cancer Radiother 2020; 24:482-492. [PMID: 32839105 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2020.06.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2020] [Revised: 06/07/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Radiation therapy has benefited from many developments over the past 20 years. These developments are mainly linked to the technology, imaging and informatics evolutions which allow better targets definitions, ensure better organs-at-risk sparing and excellent reproducibility of treatments, with a perfect control of patient positioning. In breast cancer radiotherapy, the evolution was marked by the possibility of reducing the duration of treatments from 6-7 to 3-4 weeks by using hypofractionated regimens, or by further reducing the irradiation to one week when treatment is solely focalised to the tumour bed. This concept of accelerated partial breast irradiation has challenged the paradigm of the obligation to irradiate the whole breast after conservative surgery in all patients. In addition, the technical mastery of accelerated partial breast irradiation and the development of stereotactic radiotherapy techniques are currently contributing to the development of research projects in neoadjuvant settings. Thus, numerous ongoing studies are evaluating the impact of high-dose preoperative tumour irradiation, alone or in combination with systemic treatments, on biological tumor changes, on anti-tumour immunity, and on the pathologic complete response, which is considered as predictive of better long-term survival in some molecular breast cancer subtypes. In this review, we discuss all these developments which allow breast radiation therapy to enter the era of personalisation of treatments in oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Belkacemi
- Service d'oncologie-radiothérapie-AP-HP, hôpitaux universitaires Henri-Mondor et université Paris Est Créteil, 94010 Créteil, France; Centre sein Henri-Mondor, hôpitaux universitaires Henri-Mondor, 94010 Créteil, France; Inserm U955 equipe 21, IMRB, 94010 Créteil, France.
| | - K Debbi
- Service d'oncologie-radiothérapie-AP-HP, hôpitaux universitaires Henri-Mondor et université Paris Est Créteil, 94010 Créteil, France
| | - G Loganadane
- Service d'oncologie-radiothérapie-AP-HP, hôpitaux universitaires Henri-Mondor et université Paris Est Créteil, 94010 Créteil, France; Inserm U955 equipe 21, IMRB, 94010 Créteil, France
| | - S Ghith
- Service d'oncologie-radiothérapie-AP-HP, hôpitaux universitaires Henri-Mondor et université Paris Est Créteil, 94010 Créteil, France; Centre sein Henri-Mondor, hôpitaux universitaires Henri-Mondor, 94010 Créteil, France
| | - A Hadhri
- Service d'oncologie-radiothérapie-AP-HP, hôpitaux universitaires Henri-Mondor et université Paris Est Créteil, 94010 Créteil, France
| | - W Hassani
- Service d'oncologie-radiothérapie-AP-HP, hôpitaux universitaires Henri-Mondor et université Paris Est Créteil, 94010 Créteil, France
| | - M A Cherif
- Service d'oncologie-radiothérapie-AP-HP, hôpitaux universitaires Henri-Mondor et université Paris Est Créteil, 94010 Créteil, France
| | - G Coraggio
- Service d'oncologie-radiothérapie-AP-HP, hôpitaux universitaires Henri-Mondor et université Paris Est Créteil, 94010 Créteil, France
| | - N H To
- Service d'oncologie-radiothérapie-AP-HP, hôpitaux universitaires Henri-Mondor et université Paris Est Créteil, 94010 Créteil, France; Inserm U955 equipe 21, IMRB, 94010 Créteil, France
| | - L Colson-Durand
- Service d'oncologie-radiothérapie-AP-HP, hôpitaux universitaires Henri-Mondor et université Paris Est Créteil, 94010 Créteil, France
| | - N Grellier
- Service d'oncologie-radiothérapie-AP-HP, hôpitaux universitaires Henri-Mondor et université Paris Est Créteil, 94010 Créteil, France; Centre sein Henri-Mondor, hôpitaux universitaires Henri-Mondor, 94010 Créteil, France
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Tumor Response After Neoadjuvant Magnetic Resonance Guided Single Ablative Dose Partial Breast Irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 106:821-829. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.11.406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2019] [Revised: 11/14/2019] [Accepted: 11/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
18
|
Bosma SCJ, Leij F, Vreeswijk S, Maaker MD, Wesseling J, Vijver MVD, Scholten A, Rivera S, Bourgier C, Auzac G, Foukakis T, Lekberg T, Bongard D, Loo C, Rutgers E, Bartelink H, Elkhuizen PHM. Five-Year Results of the Preoperative Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (PAPBI) Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 106:958-967. [PMID: 31987957 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.12.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2019] [Revised: 12/12/2019] [Accepted: 12/16/2019] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In this multicenter phase 2 feasibility study, we investigated the impact of preoperative accelerated partial breast irradiation (PAPBI) on local control, breast fibrosis, and cosmetic outcome. METHODS AND MATERIALS Women aged >60 years with an invasive, unifocal (mammography and magnetic resonance imaging), nonlobular adenocarcinoma of the breast were treated with PAPBI. Six weeks after radiation therapy, a wide local excision was performed. Radiation therapy consisted of 10 × 4 Gy (2010-2013) or 5 × 6 Gy (after 2013) to the tumor (gross target volume) with a 25 mm margin (20 mm from gross target volume to clinical target volume, 5 mm planning target volume). RESULTS One hundred thirty-three patients treated between 2010 and 2016 were analyzed with a median follow-up of 5.0 years (0.9-8.8 years). Seventy-eight (59%) patients were treated with 10 × 4 Gy in 2 weeks and 55 (41%) patients with 5 × 6 Gy in 1 week. Eighteen postoperative complications (14%) occurred in 15 patients (11%). The proportion of patients with no to mild fibrosis in the treated part of the breast at 2 years and later time points was around 90%. Cosmesis improved over time in several patients: excellent to good cosmetic score as rated by the physician was 68% at 6 months and 92% at 5 years. Seventy-seven percent (6 months) to 82% (5 years) of patients were "satisfied" or "very satisfied" with their cosmetic outcome. Three recurrences were detected in the biopsy track and 1 recurrence in the ipsilateral breast. CONCLUSIONS PAPBI is a feasible method with a low postoperative complication rate, limited fibrosis, and good to excellent cosmetic outcome. The local recurrence rate was 3% at 5 years; however, no local recurrences were observed since removal of the needle biopsy track.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie C J Bosma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Femke Leij
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sandra Vreeswijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel de Maaker
- Division of Molecular Pathology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jelle Wesseling
- Division of Molecular Pathology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Astrid Scholten
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sofia Rivera
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Celine Bourgier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier, France
| | - Guillaume Auzac
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Theodoros Foukakis
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Tobias Lekberg
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Desiree Bongard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Claudette Loo
- Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Emiel Rutgers
- Department of Surgical Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Harry Bartelink
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Paula H M Elkhuizen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|