1
|
Washington I, Palm RF, White J, Rosenberg SA, Ataya D. The Role of MRI in Breast Cancer and Breast Conservation Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2122. [PMID: 38893241 PMCID: PMC11171236 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16112122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2024] [Revised: 05/19/2024] [Accepted: 05/24/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Contrast-enhanced breast MRI has an established role in aiding in the detection, evaluation, and management of breast cancer. This article discusses MRI sequences, the clinical utility of MRI, and how MRI has been evaluated for use in breast radiotherapy treatment planning. We highlight the contribution of MRI in the decision-making regarding selecting appropriate candidates for breast conservation therapy and review the emerging role of MRI-guided breast radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iman Washington
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, USA;
| | - Russell F. Palm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, USA;
| | - Julia White
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Kansas Medical Center, 4001 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA;
| | - Stephen A. Rosenberg
- Department of Radiation Therapy, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, USA;
| | - Dana Ataya
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, 10920 N. McKinley Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Qadir A, Singh N, Moe AAK, Cahoon G, Lye J, Chao M, Foroudi F, Uribe S. Potential of MRI in Assessing Treatment Response After Neoadjuvant Radiation Therapy Treatment in Breast Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review. Clin Breast Cancer 2024:S1526-8209(24)00136-8. [PMID: 38906720 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2024.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Revised: 05/07/2024] [Accepted: 05/26/2024] [Indexed: 06/23/2024]
Abstract
The objective of this scoping review is to evaluate the potential of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and to determine which of the available MRI techniques reported in the literature are the most promising for assessing treatment response in breast cancer patients following neoadjuvant radiotherapy (NRT). Ovid Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases were searched to identify relevant studies published from inception until March 13, 2023. After primary selection, 2 reviewers evaluated each study using a standardized data extraction template, guided by set inclusion and exclusion criteria. A total of 5 eligible studies were selected. The positive and negative predictive values for MRI predicting pathological complete response across the studies were 67% to 88% and 76% to 85%, respectively. MRI's potential in assessing postradiotherapy tumor sizes was greater for volume measurements than uni-dimensional longest diameter measurements; however, overestimation in surgical tumor sizes was observed. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and Time to Enhance (TTE) was seen to increase post-NRT, with a notable difference between responders and nonresponders at 6 months, indicating a potential role in assessing treatment response. In conclusion, this review highlights tumor volume measurements, ADC, and TTE as promising MRI metrics for assessing treatment response post-NRT in breast cancer. However, further research with larger cohorts is needed to confirm their utility. If MRI can accurately identify responders from nonresponders to NRT, it could enable a more personalized and tailored treatment approach, potentially minimizing radiation therapy related toxicity and enhancing cosmetic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayyaz Qadir
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Nabita Singh
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Aung Aung Kywe Moe
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Glenn Cahoon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jessica Lye
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael Chao
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Farshad Foroudi
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sergio Uribe
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hannoun-Levi JM, Gimeno Morales M, Gal J, Anchuelo J, Guinot JL, Gaztañaga M, Meszaros N, Polgar C, Strnad V, Schiappa R, Gutierrez C. Very accelerated partial breast irradiation in 1 or 2 days: Late toxicity and early oncological outcome of the GEC-ESTRO VAPBI cohort. Radiother Oncol 2024; 194:110217. [PMID: 38460552 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2024] [Revised: 03/05/2024] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/11/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To analyze late toxicity after very accelerated partial breast irradiation (VAPBI) for low-risk breast cancer. MATERIALS Methods: In this retrospective, observational, international multicenter study (HDH F20220713143949), patients with low-risk breast cancer underwent lumpectomy + vAPBI (high-dose rate multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy-MIBT). VAPBI was performed with 4(4x6.2 Gy/2d), 3(3x7.45 Gy/2d) or 1 fraction (1x16Gy or 1x18Gy/1d). Primary endpoint was late toxicity. Secondary endpoints were cumulative incidence of breast cancer local relapse (LR) and distant metastatic relapse (DMR) and specific (SS) and overall (OS) survivals. Prognostic factors for late toxicity were analyzed. RESULTS From 01/2012 to 06/2022, 516 pts with early breast cancer were enrolled. Median follow-up was 44 months [95 %CI 39-46]. Median age was 71 years [40-100]. Median tumor size was 12 mm [1-35]. VAPBI delivered 1, 3 and 4 fractions for 205pts (39.7 %), 167pts (32.4 %) and 144pts (28 %) respectively. 221 late toxicity events were observed in 168pts (32.6 %) (Fibrosis, dyschromia, pain and telangiectasia). Grade 2 and 3 late toxicities were observed in 7.2 and 0.6 % respectively (no G4) with no difference between 1 and ≥ 2 treatment days. CTV > 50 cc (p = 0.007) and V150 > 40 % (p = 0.027) were prognostic factors for G ≥ 2 late toxicity. Four-year cumulative incidence rates of LR and DMR were 2 % [95 %CI 0-3] and 1 % [95 %CI 0-2] respectively. CONCLUSIONS VAPBI based on 1 or ≥ 2 days of MIBT represents an attractive de-escalation of irradiation approach for low-risk breast cancer. Late toxicity profile appears acceptable while early oncological outcome shows encouraging local control. Longer follow-up is warranted in order to confirm these preliminary results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Michel Hannoun-Levi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, University Côte d'Azur, 33 avenue Valombrose, 06189 Nice Cedex 2, Nice, France.
| | - Marta Gimeno Morales
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Jocelyn Gal
- Department of Statistics, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center - University of Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Javier Anchuelo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain
| | - Jose-Luis Guinot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Miren Gaztañaga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Norbert Meszaros
- Department of Oncology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Csaba Polgar
- National Institute of Oncology and National Tumor Biology Laboratory, Budapest, Hungary; Department of Oncology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Vratislav Strnad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Renaud Schiappa
- Department of Statistics, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center - University of Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Cristina Gutierrez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Moore-Palhares D, Dasgupta A, Saifuddin M, Anzola Pena ML, Prasla S, Ho L, Lu L, Kung J, McNabb E, Sannachi L, Vesprini D, Chen H, Karam I, Soliman H, Szumacher E, Chow E, Gandhi S, Trudeau M, Curpen B, Stanisz GJ, Kolios M, Czarnota GJ. Radiation enhancement using focussed ultrasound-stimulated microbubbles for breast cancer: A Phase 1 clinical trial. PLoS Med 2024; 21:e1004408. [PMID: 38758967 PMCID: PMC11146716 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2023] [Revised: 06/03/2024] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preclinical studies have demonstrated that tumour cell death can be enhanced 10- to 40-fold when radiotherapy is combined with focussed ultrasound-stimulated microbubble (FUS-MB) treatment. The acoustic exposure of microbubbles (intravascular gas microspheres) within the target volume causes bubble cavitation, which induces perturbation of tumour vasculature and activates endothelial cell apoptotic pathways responsible for the ablative effect of stereotactic body radiotherapy. Subsequent irradiation of a microbubble-sensitised tumour causes rapid increased tumour death. The study here presents the mature safety and efficacy outcomes of magnetic resonance (MR)-guided FUS-MB (MRgFUS-MB) treatment, a radioenhancement therapy for breast cancer. METHODS AND FINDINGS This prospective, single-center, single-arm Phase 1 clinical trial included patients with stages I-IV breast cancer with in situ tumours for whom breast or chest wall radiotherapy was deemed adequate by a multidisciplinary team (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04431674). Patients were excluded if they had contraindications for contrast-enhanced MR or microbubble administration. Patients underwent 2 to 3 MRgFUS-MB treatments throughout radiotherapy. An MR-coupled focussed ultrasound device operating at 800 kHz and 570 kPa peak negative pressure was used to sonicate intravenously administrated microbubbles within the MR-guided target volume. The primary outcome was acute toxicity per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0. Secondary outcomes were tumour response at 3 months and local control (LC). A total of 21 female patients presenting with 23 primary breast tumours were enrolled and allocated to intervention between August/2020 and November/2022. Three patients subsequently withdrew consent and, therefore, 18 patients with 20 tumours were included in the safety and LC analyses. Two patients died due to progressive metastatic disease before 3 months following treatment completion and were excluded from the tumour response analysis. The prescribed radiation doses were 20 Gy/5 fractions (40%, n = 8/20), 30 to 35 Gy/5 fractions (35%, n = 7/20), 30 to 40 Gy/10 fractions (15%, n = 3/20), and 66 Gy/33 fractions (10%, n = 2/20). The median follow-up was 9 months (range, 0.3 to 29). Radiation dermatitis was the most common acute toxicity (Grade 1 in 16/20, Grade 2 in 1/20, and Grade 3 in 2/20). One patient developed grade 1 allergic reaction possibly related to microbubbles administration. At 3 months, 18 tumours were evaluated for response: 9 exhibited complete response (50%, n = 9/18), 6 partial response (33%, n = 6/18), 2 stable disease (11%, n = 2/18), and 1 progressive disease (6%, n = 1/18). Further follow-up of responses indicated that the 6-, 12-, and 24-month LC rates were 94% (95% confidence interval [CI] [84%, 100%]), 88% (95% CI [75%, 100%]), and 76% (95% CI [54%, 100%]), respectively. The study's limitations include variable tumour sizes and dose fractionation regimens and the anticipated small sample size typical for a Phase 1 clinical trial. CONCLUSIONS MRgFUS-MB is an innovative radioenhancement therapy associated with a safe profile, potentially promising responses, and durable LC. These results warrant validation in Phase 2 clinical trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT04431674.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Moore-Palhares
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Physical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | - Archya Dasgupta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Physical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | - Shopnil Prasla
- Physical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ling Ho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Lin Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Joseph Kung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Evan McNabb
- Physical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Danny Vesprini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Hanbo Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Irene Karam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Hany Soliman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ewa Szumacher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Edward Chow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Sonal Gandhi
- Division of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Maureen Trudeau
- Division of Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Belinda Curpen
- Department of Medical Imaging, Sunnybrook Health Sciences, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Greg J. Stanisz
- Physical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University, Lublin, Poland
| | | | - Gregory J. Czarnota
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Physical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Senan S, Schneiders FL, Moghanaki D. Sub-lobar resections for peripheral non-small cell lung cancer measuring ≤ 2 cm: Insights from recent clinical trials. Radiother Oncol 2024; 192:110094. [PMID: 38224918 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Revised: 12/02/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 01/17/2024]
Abstract
The findings of two well conducted trials that randomised 1803 patients with a peripheral non-small cell lung cancer measuring ≤ 2 cm to a lobar to sub-lobar resection have established the latter as a new standard of care. It is important for non-surgical oncologists to appreciate the details of study design and outcomes of both studies, given the possible impact they have for considerations of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for operable patients with early-stage NSCLC. Differences in overall survival between the study populations highlight the impact of confounding factors like smoking history and comorbidities on reported outcomes. For example, despite low post-operative mortality rates in both trials, the 5-year disease-free survival rate in the CALGB 140503 trial was only approximately 60 % with either surgical procedure. Both phase III trials required guideline recommended nodal staging, which does not reflect real world surgical practice, and which may limit the generalisability of the reported findings to local institutional outcomes. Furthermore, the emergence of other malignancies was recorded in 15-18 % of study patients during follow-up, and patients who underwent sub-lobar resections had a better long-term survival associated with a higher likelihood of undergoing additional curative treatments. These findings from the JCOG0802 and the CALGB 140503 will encourage more interest in enrolling patients into ongoing trials comparing surgical resection with SABR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suresh Senan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, Postbus 7057 1007 MB, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Famke L Schneiders
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1117, Postbus 7057 1007 MB, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Drew Moghanaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, 200 Medical Plaza Driveway, Suite #B265, Los Angeles, CA 90095-6951 USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Guhan M, Crane SM, Valerius LS, Cruz DDL, Smith BD, Woodward WA, Mitchell MP, Valero V, Rauch GM, Krishnamurthy S, Warnecke CL, Kuerer HM, Shaitelman SF. Patient Interest in Exploring Nonsurgical Treatment Approaches for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Qualitative Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:443-454. [PMID: 37802228 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.08.065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Revised: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Advances in radiation therapy have enabled the ability to deliver ablative treatments, but there has been limited application of these treatments to early-stage breast cancers with a goal of omitting surgery. The purpose of this study was to explore patient interest in pursuing nonsurgical treatment approaches for their early-stage breast cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS We conducted a qualitative study involving interviews with 21 patients with early-stage breast cancer who were eligible for participation in a phase 2 clinical trial offering omission of definitive surgery. Interviews were transcribed and an inductive, thematic analysis was performed by 3 independent reviewers to generate themes and subthemes. RESULTS Data analysis revealed the following factors that affected patient willingness and desire to explore nonsurgical treatment options: (1) perceptions and feelings about their cancer; (2) current quality of life and the level of support available in their daily life; (3) external conversations focusing on family members' and friends' experiences with cancer and/or cancer treatments; (4) personal health care experiences, including their current breast cancer diagnosis; (5) perceptions and feelings about their physicians; (6) conversations with their physicians about their treatment options; and (7) self-identified desire to direct care decisions. Specifically, patients verbalized fearing surgery and surgical recovery; wanting to preserve their breast(s); the prior negative surgical experiences of friends, family, and themselves; a desire to receive treatment per the latest research; wanting to match the level of treatment with the severity of their cancer; and other comorbidities as reasons for wanting to explore omitting surgery. CONCLUSIONS Our findings demonstrate an unmet need directed by patient interest to explore nonsurgical options for early-stage, biologically favorable breast cancer. These results may shape conversations around shared decision-making and clinical trial design, and result in more personalized treatment options for women with early-stage breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maya Guhan
- Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Henry M Kuerer
- Breast Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zerella MA, Zaffaroni M, Ronci G, Dicuonzo S, Rojas DP, Morra A, Gerardi MA, Fodor C, Rondi E, Vigorito S, Penco S, Sargenti M, Baratella P, Vicini E, Morigi C, Kahler-Ribeiro-Fontana S, Galimberti VE, Gandini S, De Camilli E, Renne G, Cattani F, Veronesi P, Orecchia R, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Leonardi MC. A narrative review for radiation oncologists to implement preoperative partial breast irradiation. LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA 2023; 128:1553-1570. [PMID: 37650981 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-023-01706-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
The strategy to anticipate radiotherapy (RT) before surgery, for breast cancer (BC) treatment, has recently generated a renewed interest. Historically, preoperative RT has remained confined either to highly selected patients, in the context of personalized therapy, or to clinical research protocols. Nevertheless, in the recent years, thanks to technological advances and increased tumor biology understanding, RT has undergone great changes that have also impacted the preoperative settings, embracing the modern approach to breast cancer. In particular, the reappraisal of preoperative RT can be viewed within the broader view of personalized and tailored medicine. In fact, preoperative accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) allows a more precise target delineation, with less variability in contouring among radiation oncologists, and a smaller treatment volume, possibly leading to lower toxicity and to dose escalation programs. The aim of the present review, which represents a benchmark study for the AIRC IG-23118, is to report available data on different technical aspects of preoperative RT including dosimetric studies, patient's selection and set-up, constraints, target delineation and clinical results. These data, along with the ones that will become available from ongoing studies, may inform the design of the future trials and representing a step toward a tailored APBI approach with the potential to challenge the current treatment paradigm in early-stage BC.Trial registration: The study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04679454).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Alessia Zerella
- Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Mattia Zaffaroni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Ronci
- Unit of Medical Physics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Samantha Dicuonzo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Damaris Patricia Rojas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Morra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Cristiana Fodor
- Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Rondi
- Unit of Medical Physics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Sabrina Vigorito
- Unit of Medical Physics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Penco
- Division of Breast Radiology, IRCSS, IEO European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Manuela Sargenti
- Division of Breast Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Baratella
- Division of Breast Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisa Vicini
- Division of Breast Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Consuelo Morigi
- Division of Breast Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Sara Gandini
- Department of Experimental Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisa De Camilli
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Renne
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Cattani
- Unit of Medical Physics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Veronesi
- Division of Breast Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Directorate, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Cristina Leonardi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Civil YA, Jonker LW, Oei AL, van der Velde S, van den Bongard HJGD. ASO Author Reflections: Personalized Breast Cancer Treatment Using Preoperative Partial Breast Irradiation. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:5709-5710. [PMID: 36894803 PMCID: PMC10409828 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13298-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Yasmin A Civil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Lysanne W Jonker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arlene L Oei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Center for Experimental Molecular Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology and Immunology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Susanne van der Velde
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H J G Desirée van den Bongard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology and Immunology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Masi L, Doro R, Di Cataldo V, Francolini G, Zani M, Visani L, Meattini I, Livi L. Preoperative single fraction breast radiotherapy: Intra-fraction geometric uncertainties and dosimetric implications. Phys Med 2023; 112:102638. [PMID: 37441821 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.102638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Revised: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE A preoperative breast robotic radiosurgery trial was concluded in our centre. Purposes of the present study were to evaluate retrospectively over the enrolled patients: i) respiratory patterns ii) tracking uncertainties iii) necessity of respiratory compensation iv) tracking errors dosimetric effects. METHODS 22 patients were treated in 21 Gy single fraction using CyberKnife (CK) respiratory modelling and tracking (SynchronyResp) and data extracted from log-files. Respiratory motion and baseline drifts (BD) were analyzed. SynchronyResp uncertainties were computed and compared with errors simulated for CK fiducial tracking without respiratory compensation. Plans were perturbed by tracking errors and perturbed doses calculated on the planning CT scan in order to simulate the dosimetric consequences of intra-fraction errors. RESULTS After BD correction, respiratory amplitudes were below 5.5 mm except one value of 8 mm. 50% of patients showed BD above 3 mm. Standard deviations of SynchronyResp errors remained within 2.1 mm. Standard deviations of tracking errors without respiratory compensation were comparable and below 2.5 mm. Using a 3 mm PTV margin, perturbed CTV coverage was below 95% (93.7%) just for one patient. The latter case presented a large CTV-Skin interface. Perturbed OAR doses were always judged clinically acceptable. CONCLUSION Intra-fraction geometric uncertainties and their effects were quantified for breast neoadjuvant CK treatments. Data indicated that in the majority of cases respiratory compensation may be disabled without increasing uncertainties and reducing treatment time, provided that fiducial intra-fraction tracking is performed to account for BD. Dosimetric effects are mostly not clinically relevant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Masi
- Department of Medical Physics and Radiation Oncology, IFCA, Florence, Italy.
| | - Raffaela Doro
- Department of Medical Physics and Radiation Oncology, IFCA, Florence, Italy
| | - Vanessa Di Cataldo
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi Florence, Italy
| | - Giulio Francolini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi Florence, Italy
| | - Margherita Zani
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi Florence, Italy
| | - Luca Visani
- Department of Medical Physics and Radiation Oncology, IFCA, Florence, Italy; Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi Florence, Italy
| | - Icro Meattini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi Florence, Italy; Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences 'Mario Serio', University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi Florence, Italy; Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences 'Mario Serio', University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Civil YA, Jonker LW, Groot Koerkamp MPM, Duvivier KM, de Vries R, Oei AL, Slotman BJ, van der Velde S, van den Bongard HJGD. Preoperative Partial Breast Irradiation in Patients with Low-Risk Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review of Literature. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:3263-3279. [PMID: 36869253 PMCID: PMC10175515 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13233-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/29/2023] [Indexed: 03/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preoperative instead of standard postoperative partial breast irradiation (PBI) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) has the advantage of reducing the irradiated breast volume, toxicity, and number of radiotherapy sessions and can allow tumor downstaging. In this review, we assessed tumor response and clinical outcomes after preoperative PBI. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a systematic review of studies on preoperative PBI in patients with low-risk breast cancer using the databases Ovid Medline, Embase.com, Web of Science (Core Collection), and Scopus (PROSPERO registration CRD42022301435). References of eligible manuscripts were checked for other relevant manuscripts. The primary outcome measure was pathologic complete response (pCR). RESULTS A total of eight prospective and one retrospective cohort study were identified (n = 359). In up to 42% of the patients, pCR was obtained and this increased after a longer interval between radiotherapy and BCS (0.5-8 months). After a maximum median follow-up of 5.0 years, three studies on external beam radiotherapy reported low local recurrence rates (0-3%) and overall survival of 97-100%. Acute toxicity consisted mainly of grade 1 skin toxicity (0-34%) and seroma (0-31%). Late toxicity was predominantly fibrosis grade 1 (46-100%) and grade 2 (10-11%). Cosmetic outcome was good to excellent in 78-100% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS Preoperative PBI showed a higher pCR rate after a longer interval between radiotherapy and BCS. Mild late toxicity and good oncological and cosmetic outcomes were reported. In the ongoing ABLATIVE-2 trial, BCS is performed at a longer interval of 12 months after preoperative PBI aiming to achieve a higher pCR rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasmin A Civil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Lysanne W Jonker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maartje P M Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Katya M Duvivier
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ralph de Vries
- Medical Library, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arlene L Oei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Center for Experimental Molecular Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology and Immunology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Berend J Slotman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Susanne van der Velde
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H J G Desirée van den Bongard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology and Immunology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ladbury C, Amini A, Schwer A, Liu A, Williams T, Lee P. Clinical Applications of Magnetic Resonance-Guided Radiotherapy: A Narrative Review. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15112916. [PMID: 37296879 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15112916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Revised: 05/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) represents a promising new image guidance technology for radiation treatment delivery combining an onboard MRI scanner with radiation delivery technology. By enabling real-time low-field or high-field MRI acquisition, it facilitates improved soft tissue delineation, adaptive treatment, and motion management. Now that MRgRT has been available for nearly a decade, research has shown the technology can be used to effectively shrink treatment margins to either decrease toxicity (in breast, prostate cancer, and pancreatic cancer) or facilitate dose-escalation and improved oncologic outcomes (in pancreatic and liver cancer), as well as enabling indications that require clear soft tissue delineation and gating (lung and cardiac ablation). In doing so, the use of MRgRT has the potential to significantly improve the outcomes and quality of life of the patients it treats. The present narrative review aims to describe the rationale for MRgRT, the current and forthcoming state of technology, existing studies, and future directions for the advancement of MRgRT, including associated challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colton Ladbury
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
| | - Arya Amini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
| | - Amanda Schwer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope Orange County Lennar Foundation Cancer Center, Irvine, CA 92618, USA
| | - An Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
| | - Terence Williams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
| | - Percy Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope Orange County Lennar Foundation Cancer Center, Irvine, CA 92618, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Civil YA, Oei AL, Duvivier KM, Bijker N, Meijnen P, Donkers L, Verheijen S, van Kesteren Z, Palacios MA, Schijf LJ, Barbé E, Konings IRHM, -van der Houven van Oordt CWM, Westhoff PG, Meijer HJM, Diepenhorst GMP, Thijssen V, Mouliere F, Slotman BJ, van der Velde S, van den Bongard HJGD. Prediction of pathologic complete response after single-dose MR-guided partial breast irradiation in low-risk breast cancer patients: the ABLATIVE-2 trial-a study protocol. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:419. [PMID: 37161377 PMCID: PMC10169374 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-10910-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Partial breast irradiation (PBI) is standard of care in low-risk breast cancer patients after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Pre-operative PBI can result in tumor downstaging and more precise target definition possibly resulting in less treatment-related toxicity. This study aims to assess the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate one year after MR-guided single-dose pre-operative PBI in low-risk breast cancer patients. METHODS The ABLATIVE-2 trial is a multicenter prospective single-arm trial using single-dose ablative PBI in low-risk breast cancer patients. Patients ≥ 50 years with non-lobular invasive breast cancer ≤ 2 cm, grade 1 or 2, estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, and tumor-negative sentinel node procedure are eligible. A total of 100 patients will be enrolled. PBI treatment planning will be performed using a radiotherapy planning CT and -MRI in treatment position. The treatment delivery will take place on a conventional or MR-guided linear accelerator. The prescribed radiotherapy dose is a single dose of 20 Gy to the tumor, and 15 Gy to the 2 cm of breast tissue surrounding the tumor. Follow-up MRIs, scheduled at baseline, 2 weeks, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after PBI, are combined with liquid biopsies to identify biomarkers for pCR prediction. BCS will be performed 12 months after radiotherapy or after 6 months, if MRI does not show a radiologic complete response. The primary endpoint is the pCR rate after PBI. Secondary endpoints are radiologic response, toxicity, quality of life, cosmetic outcome, patient distress, oncological outcomes, and the evaluation of biomarkers in liquid biopsies and tumor tissue. Patients will be followed up to 10 years after radiation therapy. DISCUSSION This trial will investigate the pathological tumor response after pre-operative single-dose PBI after 12 months in patients with low-risk breast cancer. In comparison with previous trial outcomes, a longer interval between PBI and BCS of 12 months is expected to increase the pCR rate of 42% after 6-8 months. In addition, response monitoring using MRI and biomarkers will help to predict pCR. Accurate pCR prediction will allow omission of surgery in future patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION The trial was registered prospectively on April 28th 2022 at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05350722).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasmin A. Civil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arlene L. Oei
- Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology (LEXOR), Center for Experimental Molecular Medicine (CEMM), Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology and Immunology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Universiteit van Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Katya M. Duvivier
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nina Bijker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Philip Meijnen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lorraine Donkers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sonja Verheijen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Zdenko van Kesteren
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Miguel A. Palacios
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Laura J. Schijf
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ellis Barbé
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Inge R. H. M. Konings
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C. Willemien Menke -van der Houven van Oordt
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Paulien G. Westhoff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Hanneke J. M. Meijer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Gwen M. P. Diepenhorst
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Victor Thijssen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology (LEXOR), Center for Experimental Molecular Medicine (CEMM), Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology and Immunology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Florent Mouliere
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology and Immunology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Berend J. Slotman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Susanne van der Velde
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H. J. G. Desirée van den Bongard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology and Immunology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
De-Colle C, Kirby A, Russell N, Shaitelman S, Currey A, Donovan E, Hahn E, Han K, Anandadas C, Mahmood F, Lorenzen E, van den Bongard D, Groot Koerkamp M, Houweling A, Nachbar M, Thorwarth D, Zips D. Adaptive radiotherapy for breast cancer. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2023; 39:100564. [PMID: 36632056 PMCID: PMC9826896 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.100564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Revised: 12/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Research in the field of local and locoregional breast cancer radiotherapy aims to maintain excellent oncological outcomes while reducing treatment-related toxicity. Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) considers variations in target and organs at risk (OARs) anatomy occurring during the treatment course and integrates these in re-optimized treatment plans. Exploiting ART routinely in clinic may result in smaller target volumes and better OAR sparing, which may lead to reduction of acute as well as late toxicities. In this review MR-guided and CT-guided ART for breast cancer patients according to different clinical scenarios (neoadjuvant and adjuvant partial breast irradiation, whole breast, chest wall and regional nodal irradiation) are reviewed and their advantages as well as challenging aspects discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C. De-Colle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - A. Kirby
- Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - N. Russell
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - S.F. Shaitelman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - A. Currey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | - E. Donovan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre - Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - E. Hahn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - K. Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - C.N. Anandadas
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - F. Mahmood
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - E.L. Lorenzen
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | | | - M.L. Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - A.C. Houweling
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - M. Nachbar
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology. University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - D. Thorwarth
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology. University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Tübingen; and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - D. Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Tübingen; and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Phase 2 Study of Preoperative SABR for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Introduction of a Novel Form of Accelerated Partial Breast Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023:S0360-3016(22)03689-6. [PMID: 36796498 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.12.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Revised: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/17/2023]
|
15
|
Moore-Palhares D, Ho L, Lu L, Chugh B, Vesprini D, Karam I, Soliman H, Symons S, Leung E, Loblaw A, Myrehaug S, Stanisz G, Sahgal A, Czarnota GJ. Clinical implementation of magnetic resonance imaging simulation for radiation oncology planning: 5 year experience. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:27. [PMID: 36750891 PMCID: PMC9903411 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02209-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2022] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Integrating magnetic resonance (MR) into radiotherapy planning has several advantages. This report details the clinical implementation of an MR simulation (MR-planning) program for external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in one of North America's largest radiotherapy programs. METHODS AND MATERIALS An MR radiotherapy planning program was developed and implemented at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center in 2016 with two dedicated wide-bore MR platforms (1.5 and 3.0 Tesla). Planning MR was sequentially implemented every 3 months for separate treatment sites, including the central nervous system (CNS), gynecologic (GYN), head and neck (HN), genitourinary (GU), gastrointestinal (GI), breast, and brachial plexus. Essential protocols and processes were detailed in this report, including clinical workflow, optimized MR-image acquisition protocols, MR-adapted patient setup, strategies to overcome risks and challenges, and an MR-planning quality assurance program. This study retrospectively reviewed simulation site data for all MR-planning sessions performed for EBRT over the past 5 years. RESULTS From July 2016 to December 2021, 8798 MR-planning sessions were carried out, which corresponds to 25% of all computer tomography (CT) simulations (CT-planning) performed during the same period at our institution. There was a progressive rise from 80 MR-planning sessions in 2016 to 1126 in 2017, 1492 in 2018, 1824 in 2019, 2040 in 2020, and 2236 in 2021. As a result, the relative number of planning MR/CT increased from 3% of all planning sessions in 2016 to 36% in 2021. The most common site of MR-planning was CNS (49%), HN (13%), GYN (12%), GU (12%), and others (8%). CONCLUSION Detailed clinical processes and protocols of our MR-planning program were presented, which have been improved over more than 5 years of robust experience. Strategies to overcome risks and challenges in the implementation process are highlighted. Our work provides details that can be used by institutions interested in implementing an MR-planning program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Moore-Palhares
- grid.413104.30000 0000 9743 1587Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, T2, Toronto, ON M4N3M5 Canada ,grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada ,grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938Physical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ling Ho
- grid.413104.30000 0000 9743 1587Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, T2, Toronto, ON M4N3M5 Canada
| | - Lin Lu
- grid.413104.30000 0000 9743 1587Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, T2, Toronto, ON M4N3M5 Canada
| | - Brige Chugh
- grid.413104.30000 0000 9743 1587Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, T2, Toronto, ON M4N3M5 Canada ,grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada ,grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938Physical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | - Danny Vesprini
- grid.413104.30000 0000 9743 1587Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, T2, Toronto, ON M4N3M5 Canada ,grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Irene Karam
- grid.413104.30000 0000 9743 1587Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, T2, Toronto, ON M4N3M5 Canada ,grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Hany Soliman
- grid.413104.30000 0000 9743 1587Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, T2, Toronto, ON M4N3M5 Canada ,grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Sean Symons
- grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938Physical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada ,grid.413104.30000 0000 9743 1587Department of Medical Imaging, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Eric Leung
- grid.413104.30000 0000 9743 1587Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, T2, Toronto, ON M4N3M5 Canada ,grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Andrew Loblaw
- grid.413104.30000 0000 9743 1587Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, T2, Toronto, ON M4N3M5 Canada ,grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Sten Myrehaug
- grid.413104.30000 0000 9743 1587Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, T2, Toronto, ON M4N3M5 Canada ,grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Greg Stanisz
- grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938Physical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- grid.413104.30000 0000 9743 1587Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, T2, Toronto, ON M4N3M5 Canada ,grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Gregory J. Czarnota
- grid.413104.30000 0000 9743 1587Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, T2, Toronto, ON M4N3M5 Canada ,grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada ,grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938Physical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Canada ,grid.17063.330000 0001 2157 2938Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Thorpe CS, DeWees TA, Laughlin BS, Vallow LA, Seneviratne D, Pockaj BA, Cronin PA, Halyard MY, Vern-Gross TZ, McGee LA, McLaughlin SA, Voss MM, Golafshar MA, Bulman GF, Vargas CE. Pilot/Phase II Trial of Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy to the Whole Breast Alone Before Breast Conserving Surgery. Adv Radiat Oncol 2023; 8:101111. [PMID: 36483068 PMCID: PMC9723298 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.101111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Our purpose was to report the results of a phase II trial of patients with breast cancer treated with hypofractionated whole breast radiation therapy (RT) before breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Methods and materials Between 2019 and 2020, patients with cT0-T2, N0, M0 breast cancer were enrolled. Patients were treated with hypofractionated whole breast RT, 25 Gy in 5 fractions, 4 to 8 weeks before BCS. Pathologic assessment was performed using the residual cancer burden (RCB). Toxicities were assessed according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4). Quality of life was assessed with Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, The Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale, Linear Analogue Self-Assessment, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System. Results Twenty-two patients were enrolled. Median follow-up was 7.6 months (range, 0.2-16.8). Seven (32%) and 2 (9%) patients experienced grade 2+ or 3 toxicities, respectively. Overall quality of life Linear Analogue Self-Assessment and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System did not change significantly from baseline (P = .21 and P = .72, respectively). There was no clinically significant change (≥1 point) in any of The Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale domains. Only 1 (5%) patient experienced a clinical deterioration that corresponded to a "fair" outcome on the Harvard Cosmesis Scale. At pathologic evaluation, 14 (64%) patients had RCB-0 or RCB-I, including 3 (14%) patients with a pathologic complete response (RCB-0). Eight patients (36%) had RCB-II. No local or distant recurrences have been observed. Conclusions Extremely hypofractionated whole breast RT before BCS is a feasible approach. There were low rates of toxicities and good cosmesis. Further investigation into this approach with RT before BCS is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Todd A. DeWees
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | | | - Laura A. Vallow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Dee Seneviratne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | | | | | | | | | - Lisa A. McGee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | | - Molly M. Voss
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Montalvo SK, Collins B, Vicini F, Rahimi A. Stereotactic Partial Breast Irradiation: What Does the Future Hold? Am J Clin Oncol 2023; 46:20-24. [PMID: 36477344 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Breast irradiation has evolved significantly over the last several decades. Accelerated partial breast and stereotactic breast irradiation have evolved as strategies to reduce irradiated volumes, preserve appropriate oncologic control, and improve cosmetic outcome. The sequencing and/or combination of stereotactic partial breast irradiation with novel systemic agents is of great interest to the oncologic community. Here we explore the landscape of modern trials and opine on the future of partial breast irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven K Montalvo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Brian Collins
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tampa General Hospital, Tampa, FL
| | - Frank Vicini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Genesis Care, Farmington Hills, MI
| | - Asal Rahimi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Meattini I, Francolini G, Di Cataldo V, Visani L, Becherini C, Scoccimarro E, Salvestrini V, Bellini C, Masi L, Doro R, Di Naro F, Loi M, Salvatore G, Simontacchi G, Greto D, Bernini M, Nori J, Orzalesi L, Bianchi S, Mangoni M, Livi L. Preoperative robotic radiosurgery for early breast cancer: Results of the phase II ROCK trial (NCT03520894). Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2022; 37:94-100. [PMID: 36177053 PMCID: PMC9513617 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 09/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Preoperative partial breast irradiation treats well-defined target. Stereotactic body radiation therapy have been routinely implemented in clinical practice. No acute toxicity greater than grade 2 was recorded. A single 21 Gy dose preoperative robotic radiosurgery represents a feasible technique.
Background and purpose Preoperative partial breast irradiation (PBI) has got the advantage of treating a well-defined target. We report the results of the phase II ROCK trial (NCT03520894), enrolling early breast cancer (BC) patients treated with preoperative robotic radiosurgery (prRS), in terms of acute and early late toxicity, disease control, and cosmesis. Material and methods The study recruited between 2018 and 2021 at our Radiation Oncology Unit. Eligible patients were 50 + years old BC, hormonal receptors positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HR+/HER2-), sized up to 25 mm. The study aimed to prospectively assess the toxicity and feasibility of a robotic single 21 Gy-fraction prRS in preoperative setting. Results A total of 70 patients were recruited and 22 patients were successfully treated with pRS. Overall, three G1 adverse events (13.6 %) were recorded within 7 days from prRS. Three events (13.6 %) were recorded between 7 and 30 days, one G2 breast oedema and two G1 breast pain. No acute toxicity greater than G2 was recorded. Five patients experienced early late G1 toxicity. One patient reported G2 breast induration. No early late toxicity greater than G2 was observed. At a median follow up of 18 months (range 6–29.8), cosmetic results were scored excellent/good and fair in 14 and 5 patients, respectively, while 3 patients experienced a poor cosmetic outcome. Conclusions ROCK trial showed that a single 21 Gy dose prRS represents a feasible technique for selected patients affected by early BC, showing an acceptable preliminary toxicity profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Icro Meattini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Giulio Francolini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Vanessa Di Cataldo
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Luca Visani
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.,CyberKnife Center, Istituto Fiorentino di Cura e Assistenza (IFCA), Florence, Italy
| | - Carlotta Becherini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Erika Scoccimarro
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Viola Salvestrini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.,CyberKnife Center, Istituto Fiorentino di Cura e Assistenza (IFCA), Florence, Italy
| | - Chiara Bellini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Laura Masi
- CyberKnife Center, Istituto Fiorentino di Cura e Assistenza (IFCA), Florence, Italy
| | - Raffaela Doro
- CyberKnife Center, Istituto Fiorentino di Cura e Assistenza (IFCA), Florence, Italy
| | - Federica Di Naro
- Diagnostic Senology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Mauro Loi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Giulia Salvatore
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Gabriele Simontacchi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Daniela Greto
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Marco Bernini
- Breast Surgery Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Jacopo Nori
- Diagnostic Senology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Orzalesi
- Breast Surgery Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Simonetta Bianchi
- Division of Pathological Anatomy, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Monica Mangoni
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Anderson B, Arthur D, Hannoun-Levi JM, Kamrava M, Khan A, Kuske R, Scanderbeg D, Shah C, Shaitelman S, Showalter T, Vicini F, Wazer D, Yashar C. Partial breast irradiation: An updated consensus statement from the American brachytherapy society. Brachytherapy 2022; 21:726-747. [PMID: 36117086 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2022.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2022] [Revised: 06/15/2022] [Accepted: 07/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In recent years, results with mature follow-up have been reported for several Phase III trials randomizing women to receive whole breast irradiation (WBI) versus varying modalities of partial breast irradiation (PBI). It is important to recognize that these methods vary in terms of volume of breast tissue treated, dose per fraction, and duration of therapy. As such, clinical and technical guidelines may vary among the various PBI techniques. METHODS Members of the American Brachytherapy Society with expertise in PBI performed an extensive literature review focusing on the highest quality data available for the numerous PBI options offered in the modern era. Data were evaluated for strength of evidence and published outcomes were assessed. RESULTS The majority of women enrolled on randomized trials of WBI versus PBI have been age >45 years with tumor size <3 cm, negative margins, and negative lymph nodes. The panel also concluded that PBI can be offered to selected women with estrogen receptor negative and/or Her2 amplified breast cancer, as well as ductal carcinoma in situ, and should generally be avoided in women with extensive lymphovascular space invasion. CONCLUSIONS This updated guideline summarizes published clinical trials of PBI methods. The panel also highlights the role of PBI for women facing special circumstances, such as history of cosmetic breast augmentation or prior breast irradiation, and discusses promising novel modalities that are currently under study, such as ultrashort and preoperative PBI. Updated consensus guidelines are also provided to inform patient selection for PBI and to characterize the strength of evidence to support varying PBI modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bethany Anderson
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
| | - Douglas Arthur
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
| | | | | | - Atif Khan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Robert Kuske
- Arizona Breast Cancer Specialists, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - Daniel Scanderbeg
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Chirag Shah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH
| | - Simona Shaitelman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Timothy Showalter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA
| | | | - David Wazer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Catheryn Yashar
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Groot Koerkamp ML, van den Bongard HD, Philippens ME, van der Leij F, Mandija S, Houweling AC. Intrafraction motion during radiotherapy of breast tumor, breast tumor bed, and individual axillary lymph nodes on cine magnetic resonance imaging. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2022; 23:74-79. [PMID: 35833200 PMCID: PMC9271760 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2022.06.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Revised: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Intrafraction motion of the breast and individual axillary lymph nodes was studied. Displacements were investigated using cine magnetic resonance imaging. Motion was separated into breathing and drift components. Medians of the maximum displacements were small, <3 mm for breast and lymph nodes. Intrafraction motion of the tumor (bed) was less in prone than in supine position.
Background and purpose In (ultra-)hypofractionation, the contribution of intrafraction motion to treatment accuracy becomes increasingly important. Our purpose was to evaluate intrafraction motion and resulting geometric uncertainties for breast tumor (bed) and individual axillary lymph nodes, and to compare prone and supine position for the breast tumor (bed). Materials and methods During 1–3 min of free breathing, we acquired transverse/sagittal interleaved 1.5 T cine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast tumor (bed) in prone and supine position and coronal/sagittal cine MRI of individual axillary lymph nodes in supine position. A total of 31 prone and 23 supine breast cine MRI (in 23 women) and 52 lymph node cine MRI (in 24 women) were included. Maximum displacement, breathing amplitude, and drift were analyzed using deformable image registration. Geometric uncertainties were calculated for all displacements and for breathing motion only. Results Median maximum displacements (range over the three orthogonal orientations) were 1.1–1.5 mm for the breast tumor (bed) in prone and 1.8–3.0 mm in supine position, and 2.2–2.4 mm for lymph nodes. Maximum displacements were significantly smaller in prone than in supine position, mainly due to smaller breathing amplitude: 0.6–0.9 mm in prone vs. 0.9–1.4 mm in supine. Systematic and random uncertainties were 0.1–0.4 mm in prone position and 0.2–0.8 mm in supine position for the tumor (bed), and 0.4–0.6 mm for the lymph nodes. Conclusion Intrafraction motion of breast tumor (bed) and individual lymph nodes was small. Motion of the tumor (bed) was smaller in prone than in supine position.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maureen L Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Radiotherapy, UMC Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Corresponding author.
| | | | | | - Femke van der Leij
- Department of Radiotherapy, UMC Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Stefano Mandija
- Department of Radiotherapy, UMC Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Computational Imaging Group for MR Diagnostics & Therapy, Center for Image Sciences, UMC Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Antonetta C Houweling
- Department of Radiotherapy, UMC Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Prionas ND, Stephens SJ, Blitzblau RC. Early-stage Breast Cancer: Tailored External Beam Fractionation Approaches for Treatment of the Whole or Partial Breast. Semin Radiat Oncol 2022; 32:245-253. [DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2022.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
22
|
Vasmel JE, Groot Koerkamp ML, Mandija S, Veldhuis WB, Moman MR, Froeling M, van der Velden BH, Charaghvandi RK, Vreuls CP, van Diest PJ, van Leeuwen AG, van Gorp J, Philippens ME, van Asselen B, Lagendijk JJ, Verkooijen HM, van den Bongard HD, Houweling AC. Dynamic Contrast-enhanced and Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Response Evaluation After Single-Dose Ablative Neoadjuvant Partial Breast Irradiation. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 7:100854. [PMID: 35387418 PMCID: PMC8977856 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose We aimed to evaluate changes in dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) and diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans acquired before and after single-dose ablative neoadjuvant partial breast irradiation (NA-PBI), and explore the relation between semiquantitative MRI parameters and radiologic and pathologic responses. Methods and Materials We analyzed 3.0T DCE and DW-MRI of 36 patients with low-risk breast cancer who were treated with single-dose NA-PBI, followed by breast-conserving surgery 6 or 8 months later. MRI was acquired before NA-PBI and 1 week, 2, 4, and 6 months after NA-PBI. Breast radiologists assessed the radiologic response and breast pathologists scored the pathologic response after surgery. Patients were grouped as either pathologic responders or nonresponders (<10% vs ≥10% residual tumor cells). The semiquantitative MRI parameters evaluated were time to enhancement (TTE), 1-minute relative enhancement (RE1min), percentage of enhancing voxels (%EV), distribution of washout curve types, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). Results In general, the enhancement increased 1 week after NA-PBI (baseline vs 1 week median – TTE: 15s vs 10s; RE1min: 161% vs 197%; %EV: 47% vs 67%) and decreased from 2 months onward (6 months median – TTE: 25s; RE1min: 86%; %EV: 12%). Median ADC increased from 0.83 × 10−3 mm2/s at baseline to 1.28 × 10−3 mm2/s at 6 months. TTE, RE1min, and %EV showed the most potential to differentiate between radiologic responses, and TTE, RE1min, and ADC between pathologic responses. Conclusions Semiquantitative analyses of DCE and DW-MRI showed changes in relative enhancement and ADC 1 week after NA-PBI, indicating acute inflammation, followed by changes indicating tumor regression from 2 to 6 months after radiation therapy. A relation between the MRI parameters and radiologic and pathologic responses could not be proven in this exploratory study.
Collapse
|
23
|
Pham TT, Whelan B, Oborn BM, Delaney GP, Vinod S, Brighi C, Barton M, Keall P. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guided proton therapy: A review of the clinical challenges, potential benefits and pathway to implementation. Radiother Oncol 2022; 170:37-47. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.02.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Revised: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/25/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
24
|
Loap P, De Marzi L, Almeida CE, Barcellini A, Bradley J, de Santis MC, Dendale R, Jimenez R, Orlandi E, Kirova Y. Hadrontherapy techniques for breast cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021; 169:103574. [PMID: 34958916 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Revised: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy plays a key role in breast cancer treatment, and recent technical advances have been made to improve the therapeutic window by limiting the risk of radiation-induced toxicity or by increasing tumor control. Hadrontherapy is a form a radiotherapy relying on particle beams; compared with photon beams, particle beams have specific physical, radiobiological and immunological properties, which can be valuable in diverse clinical situations. To date, available hadrontherapy techniques for breast cancer irradiation include proton therapy, carbon ion radiation therapy, fast neutron therapy and boron neutron capture therapy. This review analyzes the current rationale and level of evidence for each hadrontherapy technique for breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre Loap
- Proton Therapy Center, Institut Curie, Orsay, France.
| | | | - Carlos Eduardo Almeida
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | - Julie Bradley
- University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL, United States
| | | | - Remi Dendale
- Proton Therapy Center, Institut Curie, Orsay, France
| | - Rachel Jimenez
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Ester Orlandi
- National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, Pavia, Italy
| | - Youlia Kirova
- Proton Therapy Center, Institut Curie, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Groot Koerkamp ML, van der Leij F, van 't Westeinde T, Bol GH, Scholten V, Bouwmans R, Mandija S, Philippens MEP, van den Bongard HJGD, Houweling AC. Prone vs. supine accelerated partial breast irradiation on an MR-Linac: A planning study. Radiother Oncol 2021; 165:193-199. [PMID: 34774649 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2021] [Revised: 11/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) may benefit from the MR-Linac for target definition, patient setup, and motion monitoring. In this planning study, we investigated whether prone or supine position is dosimetrically beneficial for APBI on an MR-Linac and we evaluated patient comfort. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty-patients (9 postoperative, 11 preoperative) with a DCIS or breast tumor <3 cm underwent 1.5 T MRI in prone and supine position. The tumor or tumor bed was delineated as GTV and a 2 cm CTV-margin and 0.5 cm PTV-margin were added. 1.5 T MR-Linac treatment plans (5 × 5.2 Gy) with 11 beams were created for both positions in each patient. We evaluated the number of plans that achieved the planning constraints and performed a dosimetric comparison between prone and supine position using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (p-value <0.01 for significance). Patient experience during scanning was evaluated with a questionnaire. RESULTS All 40 plans met the target coverage and OAR constraints, regardless of position. Heart Dmean was not significantly different (1.07 vs. 0.79 Gy, p-value: 0.027). V5Gy to the ipsilateral lung (4.4% vs. 9.8% median, p-value 0.009) and estimated delivery time (362 vs. 392 s, p-value: 0.003) were significantly lower for prone position. PTV coverage and dose to other OAR were comparable between positions. The majority of patients (13/20) preferred supine position. CONCLUSION APBI on the MR-Linac is dosimetrically feasible in prone and supine position. Mean heart dose was similar in both positions. Ipsilateral lung V5Gy was lower in prone position.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Gijsbert H Bol
- Department of Radiotherapy, UMC Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Roel Bouwmans
- Department of Radiotherapy, UMC Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Stefano Mandija
- Department of Radiotherapy, UMC Utrecht, The Netherlands; Computational Imaging Group for MR Diagnostics & Therapy, Center for Image Sciences, UMC Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Wang C, Padgett KR, Su MY, Mellon EA, Maziero D, Chang Z. Multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI) for treatment response assessment of radiation therapy. Med Phys 2021; 49:2794-2819. [PMID: 34374098 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Revised: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays an important role in the modern radiation therapy (RT) workflow. In comparison with computed tomography (CT) imaging, which is the dominant imaging modality in RT, MRI possesses excellent soft-tissue contrast for radiographic evaluation. Based on quantitative models, MRI can be used to assess tissue functional and physiological information. With the developments of scanner design, acquisition strategy, advanced data analysis, and modeling, multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), a combination of morphologic and functional imaging modalities, has been increasingly adopted for disease detection, localization, and characterization. Integration of mpMRI techniques into RT enriches the opportunities to individualize RT. In particular, RT response assessment using mpMRI allows for accurate characterization of both tissue anatomical and biochemical changes to support decision-making in monotherapy of radiation treatment and/or systematic cancer management. In recent years, accumulating evidence have, indeed, demonstrated the potentials of mpMRI in RT response assessment regarding patient stratification, trial benchmarking, early treatment intervention, and outcome modeling. Clinical application of mpMRI for treatment response assessment in routine radiation oncology workflow, however, is more complex than implementing an additional imaging protocol; mpMRI requires additional focus on optimal study design, practice standardization, and unified statistical reporting strategy to realize its full potential in the context of RT. In this article, the mpMRI theories, including image mechanism, protocol design, and data analysis, will be reviewed with a focus on the radiation oncology field. Representative works will be discussed to demonstrate how mpMRI can be used for RT response assessment. Additionally, issues and limits of current works, as well as challenges and potential future research directions, will also be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chunhao Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kyle R Padgett
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA.,Department of Radiology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Min-Ying Su
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, California, USA.,Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Eric A Mellon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Danilo Maziero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Zheng Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Oxygen-Sensitive MRI: A Predictive Imaging Biomarker for Tumor Radiation Response? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 110:1519-1529. [PMID: 33775857 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.03.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2020] [Revised: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/21/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop a noninvasive prognostic imaging biomarker related to hypoxia to predict SABR tumor control. METHODS AND MATERIALS A total of 145 subcutaneous syngeneic Dunning prostate R3327-AT1 rat tumors were focally irradiated once using cone beam computed tomography guidance on a small animal irradiator at 225 kV. Various doses in the range of 0 to 100 Gy were administered, while rats breathed air or oxygen, and tumor control was assessed up to 200 days. Oxygen-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (T1-weighted, ΔR1, ΔR2*) was applied to 79 of these tumors at 4.7 T to assess response to an oxygen gas breathing challenge on the day before irradiation as a probe of tumor hypoxia. RESULTS Increasing radiation dose in the range of 0 to 90 Gy enhanced tumor control of air-breathing rats with a TCD50 estimated at 59.6 ± 1.5 Gy. Control was significantly improved at some doses when rats breathed oxygen during irradiation (eg, 40 Gy; P < .05), and overall there was a modest left shift in the control curve: TCD50(oxygen) = 53.1 ± 3.1 Gy (P < .05 vs air). Oxygen-sensitive MRI showed variable response to oxygen gas breathing challenge; the magnitude of T1-weighted signal response (%ΔSI) allowed stratification of tumors in terms of local control at 40 Gy. Tumors showing %ΔSI >0.922 with O2-gas breathing challenge showed significantly better control at 40 Gy during irradiation while breathing oxygen (75% vs 0%, P < .01). In addition, increased radiation dose (50 Gy) substantially overcame resistance, with 50% control for poorly oxygenated tumors. Stratification of dose-response curves based on %ΔSI >0.922 revealed different survival curves, with TCD50 = 36.2 ± 3.2 Gy for tumors responsive to oxygen gas breathing challenge; this was significantly less than the 54.7 ± 2.4 Gy for unresponsive tumors (P < .005), irrespective of the gas inhaled during tumor irradiation. CONCLUSIONS Oxygen-sensitive MRI allowed stratification of tumors in terms of local control at 40 Gy, indicating its use as a potential predictive imaging biomarker. Increasing dose to 50 Gy overcame radiation resistance attributable to hypoxia in 50% of tumors.
Collapse
|
28
|
Tsoutsou PG. In Regard to Vasmel et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 110:1250-1251. [PMID: 34171239 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.01.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2020] [Accepted: 01/15/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Pelagia G Tsoutsou
- Radiation Oncology Department, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland; University of Geneva, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Lee SL, Hall WA, Morris ZS, Christensen L, Bassetti M. MRI-Guided Radiation Therapy. ADVANCES IN ONCOLOGY 2021; 1:29-39. [PMID: 37064601 PMCID: PMC10104451 DOI: 10.1016/j.yao.2021.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/18/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sangjune Laurence Lee
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI, USA
- Department of Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - William A. Hall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Zachary S. Morris
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Leslie Christensen
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Michael Bassetti
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI, USA
- Corresponding author. Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin, University Hospital L7/B36, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53792.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Groot Koerkamp ML, de Hond YJM, Maspero M, Kontaxis C, Mandija S, Vasmel JE, Charaghvandi RK, Philippens MEP, van Asselen B, van den Bongard HJGD, Hackett SS, Houweling AC. Synthetic CT for single-fraction neoadjuvant partial breast irradiation on an MRI-linac. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66. [PMID: 33761491 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abf1ba] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
A synthetic computed tomography (sCT) is required for daily plan optimization on an MRI-linac. Yet, only limited information is available on the accuracy of dose calculations on sCT for breast radiotherapy. This work aimed to (1) evaluate dosimetric accuracy of treatment plans for single-fraction neoadjuvant partial breast irradiation (PBI) on a 1.5 T MRI-linac calculated on a) bulk-density sCT mimicking the current MRI-linac workflow and b) deep learning-generated sCT, and (2) investigate the number of bulk-density levels required. For ten breast cancer patients we created three bulk-density sCTs of increasing complexity from the planning-CT, using bulk-density for: (1) body, lungs, and GTV (sCTBD1); (2) volumes for sCTBD1plus chest wall and ipsilateral breast (sCTBD2); (3) volumes for sCTBD2plus ribs (sCTBD3); and a deep learning-generated sCT (sCTDL) from a 1.5 T MRI in supine position. Single-fraction neoadjuvant PBI treatment plans for a 1.5 T MRI-linac were optimized on each sCT and recalculated on the planning-CT. Image evaluation was performed by assessing mean absolute error (MAE) and mean error (ME) in Hounsfield Units (HU) between the sCTs and the planning-CT. Dosimetric evaluation was performed by assessing dose differences, gamma pass rates, and dose-volume histogram (DVH) differences. The following results were obtained (median across patients for sCTBD1/sCTBD2/sCTBD3/sCTDLrespectively): MAE inside the body contour was 106/104/104/75 HU and ME was 8/9/6/28 HU, mean dose difference in the PTVGTVwas 0.15/0.00/0.00/-0.07 Gy, median gamma pass rate (2%/2 mm, 10% dose threshold) was 98.9/98.9/98.7/99.4%, and differences in DVH parameters were well below 2% for all structures except for the skin in the sCTDL. Accurate dose calculations for single-fraction neoadjuvant PBI on an MRI-linac could be performed on both bulk-density and deep learning sCT, facilitating further implementation of MRI-guided radiotherapy for breast cancer. Balancing simplicity and accuracy, sCTBD2showed the optimal number of bulk-density levels for a bulk-density approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M L Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Y J M de Hond
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - M Maspero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Computational Imaging Group for MR diagnostics & therapy, Center for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - C Kontaxis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - S Mandija
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Computational Imaging Group for MR diagnostics & therapy, Center for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J E Vasmel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - R K Charaghvandi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - M E P Philippens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - B van Asselen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - S S Hackett
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - A C Houweling
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Bosma SCJ, van der Leij F, Elkhuizen PHM, Vreeswijk S, Loo CE, Vogel WV, Bartelink H, van de Vijver MJ. Evaluation of Early Response to Preoperative Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (PAPBI) by Histopathology, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and 18F-fluorodexoyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (FDG PET/CT). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 110:1151-1158. [PMID: 33647369 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.02.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2020] [Revised: 02/12/2021] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to find indicators for early response to radiation therapy in breast cancer. These would be of help in tailoring treatment for individual patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS We analyzed 66 patients with low-risk breast cancer (≥60 years; cT1-2pN0) treated within the Preoperative Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (PAPBI) trial. Patients received radiation therapy (RT; 10 x 4 Gray or 5 x 6 Gray), followed by a wide local excision after 6 weeks. Patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 18F-fluorodexoyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) before RT and 5 weeks after RT, before surgery. We assessed the response to PAPBI using a histopathologic assessment and correlated this with responses on MRI and FDG PET/CT. We calculated the positive predictive values (PPVs) of MRI and PET/CT as the number of true positives (complete response on MRI/normalized at visual evaluation on PET/CT and pathologic complete response) divided by the number of patients with a complete response on MRI/normalized at visual evaluation on PET/CT. Similarly, the negative predictive values (NPVs) of MRI and PET/CT were calculated. RESULTS The pathologic response was (nearly) complete in 15 (23%) of the 66 patients and partially complete in 28 (42%). The remaining 23 patients (35%) were nonresponders. The PPV of MRI (Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors [RECIST]) was 87.5% and the NPV was 85%. The PPV and NPV of PET/CT were 25% and 92%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The most accurate method to predict a response and residual disease after preoperative RT in low-risk breast cancer was MRI, using RECIST.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie C J Bosma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Femke van der Leij
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Paula H M Elkhuizen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Vreeswijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Claudette E Loo
- Department of Radiology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter V Vogel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Harry Bartelink
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marc J van de Vijver
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam Universitair Medische Centra, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Low-Risk Patients With Breast Cancer Treated With Single-Dose Preoperative Partial Breast Irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 109:1325-1331. [PMID: 33333201 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Revised: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Preoperative partial breast irradiation (PBI) has the potential to induce tumor regression. We evaluated the differences in the numbers of preirradiation tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) between responders and nonresponders after preoperative PBI in low-risk patients with breast cancer. Furthermore, we evaluated the change in number of TILs before and after irradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS In the prospective ABLATIVE study, low-risk patients with breast cancer underwent treatment with single-dose preoperative PBI (20 Gy) to the tumor and breast-conserving surgery after 6 or 8 months. In the preirradiation diagnostic biopsy and postirradiation resection specimen, numbers of TILs in 3 square regions of 450 × 450 μm were counted manually. TILs were visualized with CD3, CD4, and CD8 immunohistochemistry. Differences in numbers of preirradiation TILs between responders and nonresponders were tested using Mann-Whitney U test. Responders were defined as pathologic complete or near-complete response, and nonresponders were defined "as all other response." Changes in numbers of TILs after preoperative PBI was evaluated with the Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS Preirradiation tissue was available from 28 patients, postirradiation tissue from 29 patients, resulting in 22 pairs of preirradiation and postirradiation tissue. In these 35 patients, 15 had pathologic complete response (43%), 11 had a near-complete response (31%), 7 had a partial response (20%), and 2 had stable disease (6%). The median numbers of CD3+ TILs, CD4+ TILs, and CD8+ TILs in the preirradiation tumor tissue were 49 (interquartile range [IQR], 36-80), 45 (IQR, 28-57), and 19 (IQR, 8-35), respectively. The number of preirradiation TILs did not differ significantly between responders and nonresponders. The median numbers of CD3+ TILs, CD4+ TILs, and CD8+ TILs in postirradiation tumor tissue were 17 (IQR, 13-31), 26 (IQR, 16-35), and 7 (IQR, 5-11), respectively. CONCLUSIONS After preoperative PBI in this limited cohort, the number of TILs in tumor tissue decreased. No differences in numbers of preirradiation TILs between responders and nonresponders were observed.
Collapse
|
33
|
Karasawa K, Omatsu T, Shiba S, Irie D, Wakatsuki M, Fukuda S. A clinical study of curative partial breast irradiation for stage I breast cancer using carbon ion radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:265. [PMID: 33187529 PMCID: PMC7666457 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01713-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 11/06/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Our institute initiated carbon ion radiotherapy research for patients with stage I breast cancer in April 2013. The purpose of this article is to evaluate the treatment outcome of cases treated outside clinical trial up to May 2020. Materials and methods Eligibility criteria of the patients were having untreated stage I breast cancer and being unsuitable for operation for physical or mental reasons. The irradiated volume was defined as the gross tumor including intraductal components. The dose escalation study was initially conducted four times a week for a total of 52.8 Gy [relative biological efficacy (RBE)]. After confirming that adverse effects were within acceptable range, the total dose was increased to 60.0 Gy (RBE). Results Between April 2013 and November 2015, 14 cases were treated. The median follow up period was 61 months. No adverse toxicities were observed except for grade 1 acute skin reaction in 10 cases. The time required from carbonion radiotherapy to tumor disappearance was 3 months in 1 case, 6 months in 3 cases, 12 months in 4 cases, and 24 months in 5 cases. The third case developed local recurrence 6 months after radiotherapy. Twelve patients with luminal subtype received 5-year endocrine therapy. Thirteen of 14 tumors have been maintaining complete response with excellent cosmetic results. Conclusions The time from carbon ion radiotherapy to tumor disappearance was longer than expected, but complete tumor disappearance was observed except for one high-grade case. With careful patient selection, carbonion radiotherapy in patients with stage I breast cancer is deemed effective and safe, and further research is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kumiko Karasawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-8666, Japan. .,National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba-city, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan.
| | - Tokuhiko Omatsu
- National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba-city, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan
| | - Shintaro Shiba
- National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba-city, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma University, 3-39-22, Showa-machi, Maebashi City, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan
| | - Daisuke Irie
- National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba-city, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma University, 3-39-22, Showa-machi, Maebashi City, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan
| | - Masaru Wakatsuki
- National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba-city, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan
| | - Shigekazu Fukuda
- National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba-city, Chiba, 263-8555, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Veluvolu M, Patel M, Narayanasamy G, Kim T. Definitive single fraction stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for inoperable early-stage breast cancer: A case report. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2020; 25:760-764. [PMID: 32742200 PMCID: PMC7387738 DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2020.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2020] [Revised: 06/02/2020] [Accepted: 06/29/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Abstract
We review a case of inoperable early stage breast cancer treated definitively with the use of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). A 57-year-old female with a history of decompensated cirrhosis with early stage breast cancer was treated with 25 Gy in one fraction. At her 7-month follow up visit, there was a complete resolution of disease on imaging. This case represents a novel approach for the treatment of breast cancer with SABR when surgery is contraindicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manasa Veluvolu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, 72205, United States
| | - Mausam Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, 72205, United States
| | - Ganesh Narayanasamy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, 72205, United States
| | - Thomas Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, 60612, United States
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Groot Koerkamp ML, Vasmel JE, Russell NS, Shaitelman SF, Anandadas CN, Currey A, Vesprini D, Keller BM, De-Colle C, Han K, Braunstein LZ, Mahmood F, Lorenzen EL, Philippens MEP, Verkooijen HM, Lagendijk JJW, Houweling AC, van den Bongard HJGD, Kirby AM. Optimizing MR-Guided Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer Patients. Front Oncol 2020; 10:1107. [PMID: 32850318 PMCID: PMC7399349 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2020] [Accepted: 06/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Current research in radiotherapy (RT) for breast cancer is evaluating neoadjuvant as opposed to adjuvant partial breast irradiation (PBI) with the aim of reducing the volume of breast tissue irradiated and therefore the risk of late treatment-related toxicity. The development of magnetic resonance (MR)-guided RT, including dedicated MR-guided RT systems [hybrid machines combining an MR scanner with a linear accelerator (MR-linac) or 60Co sources], could potentially reduce the irradiated volume even further by improving tumour visibility before and during each RT treatment. In this position paper, we discuss MR guidance in relation to each step of the breast RT planning and treatment pathway, focusing on the application of MR-guided RT to neoadjuvant PBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jeanine E. Vasmel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Nicola S. Russell
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Simona F. Shaitelman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Carmel N. Anandadas
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Adam Currey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | - Danny Vesprini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Brian M. Keller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Chiara De-Colle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Kathy Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lior Z. Braunstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Faisal Mahmood
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Research Unit for Oncology, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Ebbe L. Lorenzen
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | | | | | - Jan J. W. Lagendijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Antonetta C. Houweling
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Anna M. Kirby
- Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|