1
|
Sundar S, Symonds P. In Regard to Dinh et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 111:585. [PMID: 34473985 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 05/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Santhanam Sundar
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
| | - Paul Symonds
- University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hoffman KE, Johnstone P. A 25-year perspective on the evolution of radiation treatment of urologic cancers. Urol Oncol 2021; 39:577-581. [PMID: 34325987 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Revised: 06/04/2021] [Accepted: 06/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Advances in radiotherapy technology and technique over the last 3 decades have revolutionized radiation treatment options for genitourinary malignancies. The development of more focused and accurate radiation treatment has facilitated safe delivery of dose-escalated treatment that improves disease control and the development of shorter-duration hypofractionated treatment regimens that are more convenient for patients and improve access to treatment. The management of oligometastatic disease is evolving with ablative treatment of oligometastasis and the primary for select patients and shorter-duration palliative treatment regimens. Work is ongoing to personalize radiation treatment regimens for genitourinary malignancies based on molecular biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen E Hoffman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| | - Peter Johnstone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fonteyne V, Sargos P. What is the Optimal Dose, Fractionation and Volume for Bladder Radiotherapy? Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 33:e245-e250. [PMID: 33832838 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2021] [Revised: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
External beam radiotherapy (EBRT), as part of a trimodality approach, is an attractive bladder-preserving alternative to radical cystectomy. Several EBRT regimens with different treatment volumes have been described with similar tumour control and, so far, clear recommendations on the optimal radiotherapy regimen and treatment volume are lacking. The current review summarises EBRT literature on dose prescription, fractionation as well as treatment volume in order to guide clinicians in their daily practice when treating patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Taking into account literature on repopulation, continuous-course radiotherapy can be used safely in daily practice where a split-course should only be reserved for those patients who are fit enough to undergo a radical cystectomy in case of a poor early response. A recent meta-analysis has proven that hypofractionated radiotherapy is superior to conventional radiotherapy with regards to invasive locoregional control with similar toxicity profiles. In the absence of node-positive disease, the target volume can be restricted to the bladder. In order to compensate for organ motion, very large margins need to be applied in the absence of image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). Therefore, the use of IGRT or an adaptive approach is recommended. Based on the available literature, one can conclude that moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy to a dose of 55 Gy in 20 fractions to the bladder only, delivered with IGRT, can be considered standard of care for patients with node-negative invasive bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Fonteyne
- Department of Radiotherapy-Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - P Sargos
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hijab A, Tocco B, Hanson I, Meijer H, Nyborg CJ, Bertelsen AS, Smeenk RJ, Smith G, Michalski J, Baumann BC, Hafeez S. MR-Guided Adaptive Radiotherapy for Bladder Cancer. Front Oncol 2021; 11:637591. [PMID: 33718230 PMCID: PMC7947660 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.637591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 01/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy has an important role in the curative and palliative treatment settings for bladder cancer. As a target for radiotherapy the bladder presents a number of technical challenges. These include poor tumor visualization and the variability in bladder size and position both between and during treatment delivery. Evidence favors the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as an important means of tumor visualization and local staging. The availability of hybrid systems incorporating both MRI scanning capabilities with the linear accelerator (MR-Linac) offers opportunity for in-room and real-time MRI scanning with ability of plan adaption at each fraction while the patient is on the treatment couch. This has a number of potential advantages for bladder cancer patients. In this article, we examine the technical challenges of bladder radiotherapy and explore how magnetic resonance (MR) guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) could be leveraged with the aim of improving bladder cancer patient outcomes. However, before routine clinical implementation robust evidence base to establish whether MRgRT translates into improved patient outcomes should be ascertained.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adham Hijab
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.,Department of Radiotherapy, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Boris Tocco
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.,Department of Radiotherapy, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ian Hanson
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.,Department of Radiotherapy, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hanneke Meijer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Robert Jan Smeenk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Gillian Smith
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jeff Michalski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Brian C Baumann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Shaista Hafeez
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.,Department of Radiotherapy, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|