1
|
Tham JLM, Ng SP, Khor R, Wada M, Gan H, Thai AA, Corry J, Bahig H, Mäkitie AA, Nuyts S, De Bree R, Strojan P, Ng WT, Eisbruch A, Chow JCH, Ferlito A. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Recurrent and Oligometastatic Head and Neck Tumours. J Clin Med 2024; 13:3020. [PMID: 38892731 PMCID: PMC11173254 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13113020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2024] [Revised: 05/13/2024] [Accepted: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
The treatment of head and neck cancers (HNCs) encompasses a complex paradigm involving a combination of surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic treatment. Locoregional recurrence is a common cause of treatment failure, and few patients are suitable for salvage surgery. Reirradiation with conventional radiation techniques is challenging due to normal tissue tolerance limits and the risk of significant toxicities. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged as a highly conformal modality that offers the potential for cure while limiting the dose to surrounding tissue. There is also growing research that shows that those with oligometastatic disease can benefit from curative intent local ablative therapies such as SBRT. This review will look at published evidence regarding the use of SBRT in locoregional recurrent and oligometastatic HNCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jodie L. M. Tham
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer and Wellness Centre, Austin Health, Melbourne 3084, Australia
| | - Sweet Ping Ng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer and Wellness Centre, Austin Health, Melbourne 3084, Australia
| | - Richard Khor
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer and Wellness Centre, Austin Health, Melbourne 3084, Australia
| | - Morikatsu Wada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer and Wellness Centre, Austin Health, Melbourne 3084, Australia
| | - Hui Gan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer and Wellness Centre, Austin Health, Melbourne 3084, Australia
| | - Alesha A. Thai
- Department of Medical Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer and Wellness Centre, Austin Health, Melbourne 3084, Australia
| | - June Corry
- GenesisCare, St Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne 3065, Australia
| | - Houda Bahig
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de L’Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H2X 3E4, Canada
| | - Antti A. Mäkitie
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Research Program in Systems Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, 00100 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Sandra Nuyts
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Remco De Bree
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, VU University Medical Centre, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Primož Strojan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Wai Tong Ng
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Avraham Eisbruch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - James C. H. Chow
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Queens Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Alfio Ferlito
- International Head and Neck Scientific Group, 35100 Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mutsaers A, Abugharib A, Poon I, Loblaw J, Bayley A, Zhang L, Chin L, Galapin M, Erler D, Sahgal A, Higgins K, Enepekides D, Eskander A, Karam I. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for distant metastases to the head and neck. Support Care Cancer 2024; 32:230. [PMID: 38488881 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08419-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 03/03/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To report clinical outcomes for patients with metastatic disease to the head and neck (HN) treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). METHODS A retrospective review of patients treated with SBRT to HN sites from 2012 to 2020 was conducted. Treatment indications included the following: oligometastases, oligoprogression, and control a dominant area of progression (DAP). Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate local control (LC), regional control (RC), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). Univariable (UVA) and multivariable analyses (MVA) were performed. Grade 3-4 acute and late toxicities were reported by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0. RESULTS Fifty-six patients (58 lesions) were analysed with a median follow-up of 16 months. Primary sites included lung (25.0%), kidney (19.6%), breast (19.6%) and other (35.8%). SBRT indications were as follows: oligometastases (42.9%), oligoprogression (19.6%) and local control of a dominant area of progression (37.5%). Most patients received SBRT to a single neck node (n = 47, 81.0%). Median SBRT dose was 40 Gy (range 25-50 Gy) in five fractions, with a median biologically effective dose (BED10) of 72 Gy (range 37.5-100 Gy). One- and 2-year LC and RC rates were 97.6% and 72.7% as well as 100% and 86.7%, respectively. Median OS was 19.2 months (95% [CI] 14.8-69.4), and median PFS was 7.4 months (95% [CI] 5.2-11.9). The 1-year OS and PFS rates for oligometastases, oligoprogression and DAP were 95.8%, 63.6% and 38.1% (p = 0.0039) as well as 56.5%, 27.3% and 19.1% (p = 0.0004), respectively. On MVA, treatment indication and histology were predictive for OS, while indication and prior systemic therapy were predictive for PFS. Cumulative late grade 3 + toxicity rate was 11.3%, without grade 5 events. CONCLUSION The use of SBRT for metastatic disease to the HN provided excellent LC rates with low rates of regional failure and an acceptable toxicity profile, highlighting its utility in these patients. Patients with oligometastatic disease had better OS and PFS than others.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Mutsaers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ahmed Abugharib
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt
| | - Ian Poon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Joshua Loblaw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andrew Bayley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Liying Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lee Chin
- Department of Medical Physics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Madette Galapin
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Darby Erler
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kevin Higgins
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Danny Enepekides
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Antoine Eskander
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Irene Karam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mutsaers A, Li G, Fernandes J, Ali S, Barnes E, Chen H, Czarnota G, Karam I, Moore-Palhares D, Poon I, Soliman H, Vesprini D, Cheung P, Louie A. Uncovering the armpit of SBRT: An institutional experience with stereotactic radiation of axillary metastases. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 45:100730. [PMID: 38317679 PMCID: PMC10839264 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose/objectives The growing use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in metastatic cancer has led to its use in varying anatomic locations. The objective of this study was to review our institutional SBRT experience for axillary metastases (AM), focusing on outcomes and process. Materials/methods Patients treated with SBRT to AM from 2014 to 2022 were reviewed. Cumulative incidence functions were used to estimate the incidence of local failure (LF), with death as competing risk. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Univariate regression analysis examined predictors of LF. Results We analyzed 37 patients with 39 AM who received SBRT. Patients were predominantly female (60 %) and elderly (median age: 72). Median follow-up was 14.6 months. Common primary cancers included breast (43 %), skin (19 %), and lung (14 %). Treatment indication included oligoprogression (46 %), oligometastases (35 %) and symptomatic progression (19 %). A minority had prior overlapping radiation (18 %) or surgery (11 %). Most had prior systemic therapy (70 %).Significant heterogeneity in planning technique was identified; a minority of patient received 4-D CT scans (46 %), MR-simulation (21 %), or contrast (10 %). Median dose was 40 Gy (interquartile range (IQR): 35-40) in 5 fractions, (BED10 = 72 Gy). Seventeen cases (44 %) utilized a low-dose elective volume to cover remaining axilla.At first assessment, 87 % had partial or complete response, with a single progression. Of symptomatic patients (n = 14), 57 % had complete resolution and 21 % had improvement. One and 2-year LF rate were 16 % and 20 %, respectively. Univariable analysis showed increasing BED reduced risk of LF. Median OS was 21.0 months (95 % [Confidence Interval (CI)] 17.3-not reached) and median PFS was 7.0 months (95 % [CI] 4.3-11.3). Two grade 3 events were identified, and no grade 4/5. Conclusion Using SBRT for AM demonstrated low rates of toxicity and LF, and respectable symptom improvement. Variation in treatment delivery has prompted development of an institutional protocol to standardize technique and increase efficiency. Limited followup may limit detection of local failure and late toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. Mutsaers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - G.J. Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - J.S. Fernandes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - S. Ali
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - E.A. Barnes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - H. Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - G.J. Czarnota
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - I. Karam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - D. Moore-Palhares
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - I. Poon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - H. Soliman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - D. Vesprini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - P. Cheung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - A.V. Louie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mutsaers A, Akingbade A, Louie AV, Id Said B, Zhang L, Poon I, Smoragiewicz M, Eskander A, Karam I. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Extracranial Oligometastatic Disease from Head and Neck Primary Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:851. [PMID: 38473213 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16050851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Revised: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is increasingly used to treat disease in the oligometastatic (OM) setting due to mounting evidence demonstrating its efficacy and safety. Given the low population representation in prospective studies, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes of HNC patients with extracranial OM disease treated with SBRT. METHODS A systematic review was conducted with Cochrane, Medline, and Embase databases queried from inception to August 2022 for studies with extracranial OM HNC treated with stereotactic radiotherapy. Polymetastatic patients (>five lesions), mixed-primary cohorts failing to report HNC separately, lack of treatment to all lesions, nonquantitative endpoints, and other definitive treatments (surgery, conventional radiotherapy, and radioablation) were excluded. The meta-analysis examined the pooled effects of 12- and 24-month local control (LC) per lesion, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Weighted random-effects were assessed using the DerSimonian and Laird method, with heterogeneity evaluated using the I2 statistic and Cochran Qtest. Forest plots were generated for each endpoint. RESULTS Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria (639 patients, 831 lesions), with twelve eligible for quantitative synthesis with common endpoints and sufficient reporting. Fourteen studies were retrospective, with a single prospective trial. Studies were small, with a median of 32 patients (range: 6-81) and 63 lesions (range: 6-126). The OM definition varied, with a maximum of two to five metastases, mixed synchronous and metachronous lesions, and a few studies including oligoprogressive lesions. The most common site of metastasis was the lung. Radiation was delivered in 1-10 fractions (20-70 Gy). The one-year LC (LC1), reported in 12 studies, was 86.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 79.3-91.9%). LC2 was 77.9% (95% CI: 66.4-86.3%), with heterogeneity across studies. PFS was reported in five studies, with a PFS1 of 43.0% (95% CI: 35.0-51.4%) and PFS2 of 23.9% (95% CI: 17.8-31.2%), with homogeneity across studies. OS was analyzed in nine studies, demonstrating an OS1 of 80.1% (95% CI: 74.2-85.0%) and OS2 of 60.7% (95% CI: 51.3-69.4%). Treatment was well tolerated with no reported grade 4 or 5 toxicities. Grade 3 toxicity rates were uniformly below 5% when reported. CONCLUSIONS SBRT offers excellent LC and promising OS, with acceptable toxicities in OM HNC. Durable PFS remains rare, highlighting the need for effective local or systemic therapies in this population. Further investigations on concurrent and adjuvant therapies are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Mutsaers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
- Division of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences, Western University, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Aquila Akingbade
- Division of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences, Western University, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Alexander V Louie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Badr Id Said
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Liying Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Ian Poon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Martin Smoragiewicz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Antoine Eskander
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Irene Karam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kerba M, Lourenco RDA, Sahgal A, Cardet RDF, Siva S, Ding K, Myrehaug SD, Masucci GL, Brundage M, Parulekar WR. An Economic Analysis of SC24 in Canada: A Randomized Study of SBRT Compared With Conventional Palliative RT for Spinal Metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024:S0360-3016(24)00022-1. [PMID: 38218455 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.12.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/31/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The Canadian Cancer Trials Group (CCTG) Symptom Control 24 protocol (SC.24) was a multicenter randomized controlled phase 2/3 trial conducted in Canada and Australia. Patients with painful spinal metastases were randomized to either 24 Gy/2 stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) or 20 Gy/5 conventional external beam radiation therapy (CRT). The study met its primary endpoint and demonstrated superior complete pain response rates at 3 months following SBRT (35%) versus CRT (14%). SBRT planning and delivery is resource intensive. Given its benefits in SC.24, we performed an economic analysis to determine the incremental cost-effectiveness of SBRT compared with CRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS The trial recruited 229 patients. Cost-effectiveness was assessed using a Markov model taking into account observed survival, treatments costs, retreatment, and quality of life over the lifetime of the patient. The EORTC-QLU-C10D was used to determine quality of life values. Transition probabilities for outcomes were from available patient data. Health system costs were from the Canadian health care perspective and were based on 2021 Canadian dollars (CAD). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was expressed as the ratio of incremental cost to quality-adjusted life years (QALY). The impact of parameter uncertainty was investigated using deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS The base case for SBRT compared with CRT had an ICER of $9,040CAD per QALY gained. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the ICER was most sensitive to variations in the utility assigned to "No local failure" ($5,457CAD to $241,051CAD per QALY), adopting low and high estimates of utility and the cost of the SBRT (ICERs ranging from $7345-$123,361CAD per QALY). It was more robust to variations in assumptions around survival and response rate. CONCLUSIONS SBRT is associated with higher upfront costs than CRT. The ICER shows that, within the Canadian health care system, SBRT with 2 fractions is likely to be more cost-effective than CRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc Kerba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
| | - Richard De Abreu Lourenco
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rafael De Feria Cardet
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Shankar Siva
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Keyue Ding
- Canadian Clinical Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Sten D Myrehaug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Giuseppina L Masucci
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Michael Brundage
- Department of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queens's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Wendy R Parulekar
- Canadian Clinical Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zayed S, Louie AV, Breadner DA, Palma DA, Correa RJM. Radiation and immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of oligometastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a practical review of rationale, recent data, and research questions. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2023; 15:17588359231183668. [PMID: 37435562 PMCID: PMC10331344 DOI: 10.1177/17588359231183668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023] Open
Abstract
The combined use of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is an emerging treatment paradigm for oligometastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recent phase I and II trial data suggest that SABR to multiple metastases in addition to ICI use is safe and effective with promising progression-free survival and overall survival signals. There is great interest in capitalizing on combined immunomodulation from these two modalities for the treatment of oligometastatic NSCLC. Ongoing trials seek to validate the safety, efficacy, and preferred sequencing of SABR and ICI. This narrative review of the role of SABR when combined with ICI in oligometastatic NSCLC discusses the rationale for this bimodality treatment, summarizes recent clinical trial evidence, and proposes key principles of management based on the available evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sondos Zayed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada
| | - Alexander V. Louie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Hospital Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Daniel A. Breadner
- Department of Medical Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada
| | - David A. Palma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kumar A, Salama JK. Role of radiation in oligometastases and oligoprogression in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: consensus and controversy. Expert Rev Respir Med 2023; 17:1033-1040. [PMID: 37962878 DOI: 10.1080/17476348.2023.2284362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The oligometastatic state in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has recently become well-established. However, the specific definition of oligometastases remains unclear. Several smaller randomized studies have investigated the safety and efficacy of radiation as metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) in oligometastatic NSCLC, which have led the way to larger studies currently accruing patients globally. AREAS COVERED This review covers the definitions of 'oligometastases' and explains why the oligometastatic state is becoming increasingly relevant in metastatic NSCLC. This includes the rationale for MDT in oligometastatic NSCLC, specifically reviewing stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) as a treatment strategy. This review details many randomized trials that support radiation as MDT and introduces trials that are currently accruing patients. Finally, it explores some of the controversies that warrant further investigation. EXPERT OPINION Radiation treatment, specifically SBRT, has been shown to be safe, convenient, and cost-effective as MDT. As systemic therapy, including targeted agents and immunotherapy, continues to improve, the precise role(s) and timing of radiation therapy may evolve. However, radiation therapy as MDT will continue to be an integral part of treatment in patients with oligometastatic NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhishek Kumar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Joseph K Salama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pérez-Montero H, Lozano A, de Blas R, Sánchez JJ, Martínez E, Laplana M, Gil-Gil M, Garcia-Tejedor A, Pernas S, Falo C, Godino Ó, Pla MJ, Guedea F, Navarro-Martin A. Ten-year experience of bone SBRT in breast cancer: analysis of predictive factors of effectiveness. CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE FEDERATION OF SPANISH ONCOLOGY SOCIETIES AND OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE OF MEXICO 2023; 25:1756-1766. [PMID: 36645616 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-023-03073-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Data on the benefit of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with breast cancer (BC) and bone metastases remain limited. The purpose of this study is to report our 10-year experience of bone SBRT, analyzing toxicity and prognostic factors for local control (LC); progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS). METHODS/PATIENTS We analyzed all spine and non-spine bone SBRT performed in patients with BC during the 2012-2022 period at our institution. Treatments carried out with ablative intent in stereotactic conditions with dose/fraction ≥ 5 Gy in 5 or fewer sessions were considered. Demographic, treatment, and toxicity data were recorded according to CTCAEv4. Risk factors were assessed through univariate and multivariate analysis by Cox regression. RESULTS 60 bone SBRT treatments were performed during the study period. 75% were spine SBRT and 25% were non-spine SBRT (median BED4Gy was 80 Gy4). The median age was 52.5 years (34-79). The median tumor volume was 2.9 cm3 (0.5-39.4). The median follow-up was 32.4 months (1.2-101.7). 1 and 2 years LC were 92.9 and 86.6%, respectively. 1 and 2 years OS were 100 and 90.6%, respectively. Multivariate analysis (MVA) associated volume of the treated lesion ≥ 13 cm3 with worse LC (p = 0.046; HR 12.1, 95%CI = 1.1-140.3). In addition, deferring SBRT > 3 months after lesion diagnosis to prioritize systemic treatment showed a significant benefit, improving the 2 years LC up to 96.8% vs. 67.5% for SBRT performed before this period (p = 0.031; HR 0.1, 95%CI = 0.01-0.8). Hormonal receptors, the total number of metastases, and CA15-3 value were significantly associated with OS in MVA. During follow-up, three non-spine fractures (5%) were observed. CONCLUSIONS According to our data, bone SBRT is a safe and effective technique for BC. Upfront systemic treatment before SBRT offers a benefit in LC. Therefore, SBRT should be considered after prior systemic treatment in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Héctor Pérez-Montero
- Radiation Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 199-203, 08908, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alicia Lozano
- Radiation Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 199-203, 08908, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rodolfo de Blas
- Medical Physics and Radiation Protection Department, Radiation Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 199-203, 08908, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Juan José Sánchez
- Radiodiagnostic Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Carrer de la Feixa Llarga, S/N, 08907, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Evelyn Martínez
- Radiation Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 199-203, 08908, Barcelona, Spain
| | - María Laplana
- Radiation Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 199-203, 08908, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Miguel Gil-Gil
- Medical Oncology Department, Radiation Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Amparo Garcia-Tejedor
- Gynecology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Carrer de la Feixa Llarga, S/N, 08907, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sonia Pernas
- Medical Oncology Department, Radiation Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Catalina Falo
- Medical Oncology Department, Radiation Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Óscar Godino
- Neurosurgery Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Carrer de la Feixa Llarga, S/N, 08907, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria J Pla
- Gynecology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Carrer de la Feixa Llarga, S/N, 08907, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ferrán Guedea
- Radiation Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 199-203, 08908, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Arturo Navarro-Martin
- Radiation Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 199-203, 08908, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
de Bree R, Hardillo JA, de Ridder M. Oligometastases in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2023; 23:1-3. [PMID: 36380722 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2023.2148658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Remco de Bree
- Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jose A Hardillo
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mischa de Ridder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tan VS, Palma DA. Top Ten Lessons Learned from Trials in Oligometastatic Cancers. Cancer Res Treat 2023; 55:5-14. [PMID: 36567069 PMCID: PMC9873316 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2022.1460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent evidence supports the role of aggressive local treatment in the oligometastatic setting. In this review, we discuss the top 10 lessons we have learned from trials in oligometastatic cancers. Major lessons learned pertain to definitions of oligometastatic disease, outcomes, toxicity, costs, and the combination of ablative therapies with systemic therapy, including immunotherapy. Barriers to accrual for trials and upcoming phase III trials are also reviewed. These lessons may help to inform clinical practice and may be the basis for future research in the oligometastatic space.
Collapse
|
11
|
Olson RA, Palma DA. Should Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy Be Used for Oligometastatic Disease? NEJM EVIDENCE 2022; 1:EVIDtt2200209. [PMID: 38319839 DOI: 10.1056/evidtt2200209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
Should SABR Be Used for Oligometastatic Disease?The efficacy of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy in the oligometastatic setting has not been shown in phase 3 randomized controlled trials for breast (or many other) cancers. We review the evidence base and propose a trial to address the question, should stereotactic ablative radiotherapy be used for oligometastatic disease?
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert A Olson
- The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sher DJ, Chen RC. The Cost-Effectiveness of Consolidative Radiation Therapy in Oligometastatic Disease: High-Value Proposition or Wishful Thinking? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 114:824-826. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.09.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2022] [Accepted: 09/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
13
|
Oligometastases: Learning From the Past, Building for the Future. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 114:833-835. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.03.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2022] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
14
|
Willmann J, Vlaskou Badra E, Adilovic S, Christ SM, Ahmadsei M, Mayinger M, Guckenberger M, Andratschke N. Stereotactic body radiotherapy to defer systemic therapy in patients with oligorecurrent disease. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2022; 37:12-18. [PMID: 36046333 PMCID: PMC9421088 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Revised: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
SBRT may be used to defer systemic therapy in patients with oligorecurrence. Low rates of systemic therapy after SBRT for all oligorecurrent lesions were observed. Patients had favorable OS and few treatment-related toxicities. New metastases were treated with repeat SBRT in 33.8% of patients. Fewer lines of systemic therapy and a low baseline tumor volume were associated with longer systemic therapy-free interval.
Background Patients who develop oligorecurrent disease may be treated with metastasis-directed stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to defer the start of systemic therapy and delay its potential side effects. We report oncological outcomes and patterns of failure in patients with oligorecurrent disease treated with SBRT and determine which factors impact the interval to initiation of systemic therapy. Material/Methods This retrospective study included patients with oligorecurrent disease (≤5 lesions) from any solid organ malignancy, treated with SBRT to all metastases and no systemic therapy for a minimum one month after SBRT between 01/2014 and 12/2019. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and the cumulative incidence of initiation of systemic therapy was analyzed assuming death without systemic therapy as a competing risk. Univariable and multivariable analyses are used to assess predictors of the systemic therapy-free interval. Results Among 545 patients treated with SBRT for oligometastatic disease, 142 patients were treated with SBRT only for oligorecurrent disease. The most common primary tumors were lung and gastrointestinal cancer in 47 (33.1 %) and 28 (19.7 %) patients, respectively. After a median follow-up of 25 months, the median PFS and OS was 6.1 months and 48.9 months, respectively. Distant metastases were the most common first failure, and oligometastatic distant failure occured in 86 patients (60.6 %). New metastases were treated with repeat SBRT in 48 patients (33.8 %). The 1- and 2-year cumulative incidence of initiation of systemic therapy was 24.6 % and 36.8 %, respectively. In multivariable analysis, the number of previous lines of systemic therapy and the cumulative volume of metastases were significantly associated with the interval to initiation of systemic therapy. Conclusion Selected patients with oligorecurrence achieved favorable OS and low cumulative incidence of initiation of systemic therapy. Prospective studies are warranted to determine how the deferral of systemic therapy impacts OS compared with immediate systemic therapy in combination with SBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Willmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Eugenia Vlaskou Badra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Selma Adilovic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Sebastian M Christ
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Maiwand Ahmadsei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael Mayinger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nicolaus Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Yaney A, Stevens A, Monk P, Martin D, Diaz DA, Wang SJ. Radiotherapy in Oligometastatic, Oligorecurrent and Oligoprogressive Prostate Cancer: A Mini-Review. Front Oncol 2022; 12:932637. [PMID: 35756663 PMCID: PMC9213742 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.932637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Globally, prostate cancer is one of the most common malignancies affecting men. With the advent of advanced molecular imaging, an increasing number of men are found to have oligometastatic disease (OD) either at primary diagnosis or at the time of biochemical failure. No strict definition exists for OD, with historical and ongoing studies utilizing diverse criteria. There is mounting evidence from many different malignancies that patients with OD have improved outcomes compared to their widely metastatic counterparts. As such, treatment intensification of those with OD or oligoprogressive disease has become an area of intense interest and study. This article will review the biology, evidence and controversy behind the treatment of de novo oligometastatic, oligorecurrent and oligoprogressive prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Yaney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Andrew Stevens
- College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Paul Monk
- Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Douglas Martin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Dayssy A Diaz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Shang-Jui Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Verma V, Yegya-Raman N, Sprave T, Han G, Kantarjian HM, Welsh JW, Chang JY, Lin SH. A Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness Studies of Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Cancer Oligometastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 114:977-988. [PMID: 35675852 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.05.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Revised: 05/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE It is crucial to economically justify the use of promising therapies such as stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for oligometastatic disease (OMD). The goal of this systematic review was to summatively evaluate publications that analyzed the cost-effectiveness of SABR for OMD. METHODS AND MATERIALS Using PRISMA-guided methodology, PubMed and EMBASE were searched for modeling-based cost effectiveness (CE) studies for various forms of limited metastatic disease. Only full publications that specifically compared SABR with a systemic therapy-based approach were included. RESULTS Of 9 studies, 4 pertained to OMD with mixed histologies, 2 to oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer, 1 to pulmonary OMD, 1 to liver OMD, and 1 to low-volume oligorecurrent castration-sensitive prostate cancer. All but one investigation illustrated that SABR was cost-effective for the studied population (or a subpopulation); of these studies, the incremental CE ratios (ICERs) for SABR (when reported) ranged from $28,000/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) to $55,000/QALY. Of studies that reported the probability of SABR being cost-effective at common willingness-to-pay values, the median (range) probability of achieving CE was roughly 61% (30-88%) at a $50,000/QALY threshold and 78% (31%-100%) at a $100,000/QALY threshold. CONCLUSIONS The available evidence suggests that SABR is a cost-effective approach for OMD, which has implications for value-based oncologic practice and construction of future health policies. However, re-assessment is required in the context of modern systemic therapies (e.g. immunotherapy) as well as long-term follow-up of existing and newly reported randomized trials. Prudent patient selection remains the single most important factor influencing the CE of SABR for OMD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nikhil Yegya-Raman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Tanja Sprave
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Guang Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Hagop M Kantarjian
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - James W Welsh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Joe Y Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Steven H Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lessons in stereotactic radiotherapy for oligometastases. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2022; 53:S63-S65. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2022.04.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
18
|
Lourenco RDA, Khoo T, Crothers A, Haas M, Montgomery R, Ball D, Bressel M, Siva S. Cost-Effectiveness of Single Versus Multifraction SABR for Pulmonary Oligometastases: The SAFRON II Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 114:968-976. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.01.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Revised: 01/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
|
19
|
Evaluation of Patient-Reported Outcome Differences by Radiotherapy Techniques for Bone Metastases in A Population-Based Healthcare System. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:2073-2080. [PMID: 35323367 PMCID: PMC8947740 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29030167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Revised: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
We assessed whether advanced RT techniques were associated with differences in patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Patients with bone metastases who completed the brief pain inventory (BPI) before and after RT were identified, and RT technique was categorized as simple (e.g., parallel opposed pair) or advanced (e.g., 3D-conformal RT (3DCRT), intensity-modulated RT (IMRT), or stereotactic ablative RT (SABR)). Pain response and patient-reported interference on quality of life secondary to pain was compared. A total of 1712 patients completed the BPI. From 2017−2021, the rate of advanced RT technique increased significantly (p < 0.001; 2.4%, 2.4%, 9.7%, 5.5%, 9.3%), with most advanced techniques consisting of IMRT, and only 7% of advanced techniques were SABR. Comparing simple vs. advanced technique, neither the complete pain response (12.3% vs. 11.4%; p = 0.99) nor the partial pain response (50.0% vs. 51.8%; p = 0.42) was significantly different. There was no significant patient-reported difference in pain interfering with general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relationships, sleep, or enjoyment of life. Given that there is increasing utilization of advanced RT techniques, there is further need for randomized trials to assess their benefits given the increased cost and inconvenience to patients.
Collapse
|
20
|
Fogarty T, Tacey M, McCorkell G, Kok D, Hornby C, Milne RL, Millar J, Foroudi F, Ong WL. Patterns of the use of advanced radiation therapy techniques for the management of bone metastases and the associated factors in Victoria. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2022; 66:678-687. [PMID: 35106919 PMCID: PMC9541909 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Revised: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 01/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To describe the pattern of the use of advanced radiation therapy (RT) techniques, including intensity-modulated RT (IMRT), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and stereotactic body RT (SBRT) for the management of bone metastases (BM), and the associated factors in Victoria. METHODS We used a population-based cohort of patients from the state-wide Victorian Radiotherapy Minimum Data Set (VRMDS) who received RT for BM between 2012 and 2017. The primary outcome was proportion of RT courses using advanced RT techniques. The Cochran-Armitage test for trend was used to evaluate temporal trend in advanced RT use. Multinomial logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with advanced RT use. RESULTS A total of 18,158 courses of RT were delivered to 10,956 patients-16,626 (91.6%) courses were 3D conformal RT, 857 (4.7%) IMRT/VMAT and 675 (3.7%) SBRT. There was a sharp increase in IMRT/VMAT use from <1% in 2012-2015, to 10.1% in 2016 and 16.3% in 2017 (P-trend < 0.001). Increase in SBRT use was more gradual, from 1.2% in 2012 to 4.8% in 2016 and 5.5% in 2017 for SBRT (P-trend<0.001). In multivariate analyses, year of RT was the strongest predictor of IMRT/VMAT use (OR = 41; 95%CI = 25-67; P < 0.001, comparing 2012-2013 and 2016-2017). Primary tumour type (prostate cancer) was the strongest predictor of SBRT use (OR = 6.07; 95% CI = 4.19-8.80; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Overall, there was increasing trend in the use of advanced RT techniques for BM in Victoria, with a distinct pattern for IMRT/VMAT compared with SBRT - SBRT uptake was more gradual while IMRT/VMAT uptake was abrupt, occurring contemporaneously with Medicare Benefit Scheme funding changes in 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamara Fogarty
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.,Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mark Tacey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Giulia McCorkell
- Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - David Kok
- Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Colin Hornby
- Victorian Department of Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Roger L Milne
- Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jeremy Millar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Central Clinical School, Monash University, Prahran, Victoria, Australia
| | - Farshad Foroudi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Wee Loon Ong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Prahran, Victoria, Australia.,School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Radiation Therapy in Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma: From Palliation to Ablation. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13194775. [PMID: 34638260 PMCID: PMC8508247 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13194775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2021] [Revised: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary In the United States, over 13,000 patients are diagnosed with soft tissue sarcoma annually leading to over 5000 deaths per year despite aggressive treatments including radiotherapy, surgery, and chemotherapy. Although the majority of patients present with localized disease, unfortunately many will develop metastatic disease, which is generally not curable. There is growing evidence that local ablative therapies may be beneficial in patients with a variety of metastatic malignancies. In this review article, we explore the evolving role of radiotherapy in patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma. In particular, we review the growing role of ablative radiotherapy for oligometastatic disease, local control of the primary site, and palliation. Abstract The management of patients with metastatic cancer is rapidly changing. Historically, radiotherapy was utilized for the treatment of localized disease or for palliation. While systemic therapy remains the mainstay of management for patients with metastatic cancer, radiotherapy is becoming increasingly important not only to palliate symptoms, but also to ablate oligometastatic or oligoprogressive disease and improve local control in the primary site. There is emerging evidence in multiple solid malignancies that patients with low volume metastatic disease that undergo local ablative therapy to metastatic sites may have improved progression free survival and potentially overall survival. In addition, there is increasing evidence that select patients with metastatic disease may benefit from aggressive treatment of the primary site. Patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma have a poor overall prognosis. However, there may be opportunities in patients with low volume metastatic soft tissue sarcoma to improve outcomes with local therapy including surgery, ablation, embolization, and radiation therapy. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) offers a safe, convenient, precise, and non-invasive option for ablation of sites of metastases. In this review article, we explore the limited yet evolving role of radiotherapy to metastatic and primary sites for local control and palliation, particularly in the oligometastatic setting.
Collapse
|
22
|
Thariat J, Calugaru V, Aloi D, Maingon P, Grégoire V. Head and neck proton therapy in France: A missed opportunity or a challenge in front of us? Cancer Radiother 2021; 25:537-544. [PMID: 34272183 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2021.06.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2021] [Revised: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Following major advances of the best of photon-techniques such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and, to arrive soon, magnetic resonance (MR)-linac radiotherapy, there are still substantial opportunities in the treatment of head and neck cancers to further reduce the toxicity burden. Proton therapy represents another attractive option in this high-quality and highly competitive precision radiotherapy landscape. Proton therapy holds promises to reduce toxicities and to escalate the dose in radioresistant cases or cases where dose distribution is not satisfactory with photons. However, the selection of patients for proton therapy needs to be done using evidence-based medicine to build arguments in favor of personalized precision radiation therapy. Referral to proton therapy versus IMRT or SBRT should be registered (ProtonShare® platform) and envisioned in a formalized clinical research perspective through randomized trials. The use of an enrichment process using a model-based approach should be done to only randomize patients doomed to benefit from proton. To tackle such great opportunities, the French proton therapy challenge is to collaborate at the national and international levels, and to demonstrate that the extra-costs of treatment are worth clinically and economically in the short, mid, and long-term. In parallel to the clinical developments, there are still preclinical issues to be tackled (e.g., proton FLASH, mini-beams, combination with immunotherapy), for which the French Radiotransnet network offers a unique platform. The current article provides a personal view of the challenges and opportunities with a focus on clinical research and randomized trial requirements as well as the needs for strong collaborations at the national and international levels for PT in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck to date.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Thariat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre François-Baclesse, Caen, France; Laboratoire de physique Corpusculaire IN2P3/ENSICAEN/CNRS UMR 6534, Normandie Université, Caen, France; GORTEC - Intergroupe ORL, Tours, France.
| | - V Calugaru
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - D Aloi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, Côte d'Azur University, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - P Maingon
- Department of Oncology Radiotherapy, CLIP (2) Galilée, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie (IUC), Sorbonne University, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - V Grégoire
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Léon-Bérard, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Mehrens D, Unterrainer M, Corradini S, Niyazi M, Manapov F, Westphalen CB, Froelich MF, Wildgruber M, Seidensticker M, Ricke J, Rübenthaler J, Kunz WG. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Local Treatment in Oligometastatic Disease. Front Oncol 2021; 11:667993. [PMID: 34211842 PMCID: PMC8239286 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.667993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2021] [Accepted: 05/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In certain malignancies, patients with oligometastatic disease benefit from radical ablative or surgical treatment. The SABR-COMET trial demonstrated a survival benefit for oligometastatic patients randomized to local stereotactic ablative radiation (SABR) compared to patients receiving standard care (SC) alone. Our aim was to determine the cost-effectiveness of SABR. MATERIALS AND METHODS A decision model based on partitioned survival simulations estimated costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) associated with both strategies in a United States setting from a health care perspective. Analyses were performed over the trial duration of six years as well as a long-term horizon of 16 years. Model input parameters were based on the SABR-COMET trial data as well as best available and most recent data provided in the published literature. An annual discount of 3% for costs was implemented in the analysis. All costs were adjusted to 2019 US Dollars according to the United States Consumer Price Index. SABR costs were reported with an average of $11,700 per treatment. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. Incremental costs, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) were calculated. The willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was set to $100,000/QALY. RESULTS Based on increased overall and progression-free survival, the SABR group showed 0.78 incremental QALYs over the trial duration and 1.34 incremental QALYs over the long-term analysis. Treatment with SABR led to a marginal increase in costs compared to SC alone (SABR: $304,656; SC: $303,523 for 6 years; ICER $1,446/QALY and SABR: $402,888; SC: $350,708 for long-term analysis; ICER $38,874/QALY). Therapy with SABR remained cost-effective until treatment costs of $88,969 over the trial duration (i.e. 7.6 times the average cost). Sensitivity analysis identified a strong model impact for ongoing annual costs of oligo- and polymetastatic disease states. CONCLUSION Our analysis suggests that local treatment with SABR adds QALYs for patients with certain oligometastatic cancers and represents an intermediate- and long-term cost-effective treatment strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dirk Mehrens
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Farkhad Manapov
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Matthias F. Froelich
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim-University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Moritz Wildgruber
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Max Seidensticker
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Wolfgang G. Kunz
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Oligometastatic Cancer: Key Concepts and Research Opportunities for 2021 and Beyond. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13112518. [PMID: 34063904 PMCID: PMC8196648 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13112518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2021] [Revised: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 05/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Traditionally, clinicians distinguished three forms of cancer outgrowth [...].
Collapse
|