Screening and Validation of Molecular Targeted Radiosensitizers

Integrated High-Throughput Screening and Large-Scale Isobolographic Analysis to Accelerate the Discovery of Radiosensitizers With Greater Selectivity for Cancer Cells

PURPOSE

High-throughput screening (HTS) platforms have been widely used to identify candidate anticancer drugs and drug-drug combinations; however, HTS-based identification of new drug-ionizing radiation (IR) combinations has rarely been reported. Herein, we developed an integrated approach including cell-based HTS and computational large-scale isobolographic analysis to accelerate the identification of radiosensitizing compounds acting strongly and more specifically on cancer cells.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In a 384-well plate format, 160 compounds likely to interfere with the cell response to radiation were screened on human glioblastoma (U251-MG) and cervix carcinoma (ME-180) cell lines, as well as on normal fibroblasts (CCD-19Lu). After drug exposure, cells were irradiated or not and short-term cell survival was assessed by high-throughput cell microscopy. Computational large-scale dose-response and isobolographic approach were used to identify promising synergistic drugs radiosensitizing cancer cells rather than normal cells. Synergy of a promising compound was confirmed on ME-180 cells by an independent 96-well assay protocol, and finally, by the gold-standard colony forming assay.

RESULTS

We retained 4 compounds synergistic at 2 isoeffects in U251-MG and ME-180 cell lines and 11 compounds synergistically effective in only one cancer cell line. Among these 15 promising radiosensitizers, 5 compounds showed limited toxicity combined or not with IR on normal fibroblasts.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, this study demonstrated that HTS chemoradiation screening together with large-scale computational analysis is an efficient tool to identify synergistic drug-IR combinations, with concomitant assessment of unwanted toxicity on normal fibroblasts. It sparks expectations to accelerate the discovery of highly desired agents improving the therapeutic index of radiation therapy.

ClonoScreen3D - A Novel 3-Dimensional Clonogenic Screening Platform for Identification of Radiosensitizers for Glioblastoma

PURPOSE

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a lethal brain tumor. Standard-of-care treatment comprising surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy results in median survival rates of 12 to 15 months. Molecular-targeted agents identified using conventional 2-dimensional (2D) in vitro models of GBM have failed to improve outcome in patients, rendering such models inadequate for therapeutic target identification. A previously developed 3D GBM in vitro model that recapitulates key GBM clinical features and responses to molecular therapies was investigated for utility for screening novel radiation-drug combinations using gold-standard clonogenic survival as readout.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patient-derived GBM cell lines were optimized for inclusion in a 96-well plate 3D clonogenic screening platform, ClonoScreen3D. Radiation responses of GBM cells in this system were highly reproducible and comparable to those observed in low-throughout 3D assays. The screen methodology provided quantification of candidate drug single agent activity (half maximal effective concentration or EC50) and the interaction between drug and radiation (radiation interaction ratio).

RESULTS

The poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors talazoparib, rucaparib, and olaparib each showed a significant interaction with radiation by ClonoScreen3D and were subsequently confirmed as true radiosensitizers by full clonogenic assay. Screening a panel of DNA damage response inhibitors revealed the expected propensity of these compounds to interact significantly with radiation (13/15 compounds). A second screen assessed a panel of compounds targeting pathways identified by transcriptomic analysis and demonstrated single agent activity and a previously unreported interaction with radiation of dinaciclib and cytarabine (radiation interaction ratio 1.28 and 1.90, respectively). These compounds were validated as radiosensitizers in full clonogenic assays (sensitizer enhancement ratio 1.47 and 1.35, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The ClonoScreen3D platform was demonstrated to be a robust method to screen for single agent and radiation-drug combination activity. Using gold-standard clonogenicity, this assay is a tool for identification of radiosensitizers. We anticipate this technology will accelerate identification of novel radiation-drug combinations with genuine translational value.

The role of radiotherapy in the management of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors: a single-center retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

This study sought to investigate the role of radiotherapy (RT) in addition to surgery for oncological outcomes in patients with malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST).

METHODS

In this single-center, retrospective cohort study, histopathologically confirmed MPNST were analyzed. Local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with LC, OS, and DMFS.

RESULTS

We included 57 patients with a median follow-up of 20.0 months. Most MPNSTs were located deeply (87.5%), were larger than 5 cm (55.8%), and had high-grade histology (78.7%). Seventeen patients received surgery only, and 25 patients received surgery and pre- or postoperative RT. Median LC, OS, and DMFS after surgery only were 8.7, 25.5, and 22.0 months; after surgery with RT, the median LC was not reached, while the median OS and DMFS were 111.5 and 69.9 months. Multivariable Cox regression of LC revealed a negative influence of patients presenting with local disease recurrence compared to patients presenting with an initial primary diagnosis of localized MPNST (hazard ratio: 8.86, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of RT to wide surgical excision appears to have a beneficial effect on LC. Local disease recurrence at presentation is an adverse prognostic factor for developing subsequent local recurrences. Future clinical and translational studies are warranted to identify molecular targets and find effective perioperative combination therapies with RT to improve patient outcomes.

Photon and Proton irradiation in Patient-derived, Three-Dimensional Soft Tissue Sarcoma Models

BACKGROUND

Despite their heterogeneity, the current standard preoperative radiotherapy regimen for localized high-grade soft tissue sarcoma (STS) follows a one fits all approach for all STS subtypes. Sarcoma patient-derived three-dimensional cell culture models represent an innovative tool to overcome challenges in clinical research enabling reproducible subtype-specific research on STS. In this pilot study, we present our methodology and preliminary results using STS patient-derived 3D cell cultures that were exposed to different doses of photon and proton radiation. Our aim was: (i) to establish a reproducible method for irradiation of STS patient-derived 3D cell cultures and (ii) to explore the differences in tumor cell viability of two different STS subtypes exposed to increasing doses of photon and proton radiation at different time points.

METHODS

Two patient-derived cell cultures of untreated localized high-grade STS (an undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) and a pleomorphic liposarcoma (PLS)) were exposed to a single fraction of photon or proton irradiation using doses of 0 Gy (sham irradiation), 2 Gy, 4 Gy, 8 Gy and 16 Gy. Cell viability was measured and compared to sham irradiation at two different time points (four and eight days after irradiation).

RESULTS

The proportion of viable tumor cells four days after photon irradiation for UPS vs. PLS were significantly different with 85% vs. 65% (4 Gy), 80% vs. 50% (8 Gy) and 70% vs. 35% (16 Gy). Proton irradiation led to similar diverging viability curves between UPS vs. PLS four days after irradiation with 90% vs. 75% (4 Gy), 85% vs. 45% (8 Gy) and 80% vs. 35% (16 Gy). Photon and proton radiation displayed only minor differences in cell-killing properties within each cell culture (UPS and PLS). The cell-killing effect of radiation sustained at eight days after irradiation in both cell cultures.

CONCLUSIONS

Pronounced differences in radiosensitivity are evident among UPS and PLS 3D patient-derived sarcoma cell cultures which may reflect the clinical heterogeneity. Photon and proton radiation showed similar dose-dependent cell-killing effectiveness in both 3D cell cultures. Patient-derived 3D STS cell cultures may represent a valuable tool to enable translational studies towards individualized subtype-specific radiotherapy in patients with STS.

Afatinib Reverses EMT via Inhibiting CD44-Stat3 Axis to Promote Radiosensitivity in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Afatinib, a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), exerts its radiosensitive effects in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). However, the detailed mechanism of afatinib-mediated sensitivity to radiation is still obscure in NPC.

METHODS

Quantitative phosphorylated proteomics and bioinformatics analysis were performed to illustrate the global phosphoprotein changes. The activity of the CD44-Stat3 axis and Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT)-linked markers were evaluated by Western blotting. Wound healing and transwell assays were used to determine the levels of cell migration upon afatinib combined IR treatment. Cell proliferation was tested by CCK-8 assay. A pharmacological agonist by IL-6 was applied to activate Stat3. The xenograft mouse model was treated with afatinib, radiation or a combination of afatinib and radiation to detect the radiosensitivity of afatinib in vivo.

RESULTS

In the present study, we discovered that afatinib triggered global protein phosphorylation alterations in NPC cells. Further, bioinformatics analysis indicated that afatinib inhibited the CD44-Stat3 signaling and subsequent EMT process. Moreover, functional assays demonstrated that afatinib combined radiation treatment remarkably impeded cell viability, migration, EMT process and CD44-Stat3 activity in vitro and in vivo. In addition, pharmacological stimulation of Stat3 rescued radiosensitivity and biological functions induced by afatinib in NPC cells. This suggested that afatinib reversed the EMT process by blocking the activity of the CD44-Stat3 axis.

CONCLUSION

Collectively, this work identifies the molecular mechanism of afatinib as a radiation sensitizer, thus providing a potentially useful combination treatment and drug target for NPC radiosensitization. Our findings describe a new function of afatinib in radiosensitivity and cancer treatment.

Pencil beam scanning proton FLASH maintains tumor control while normal tissue damage is reduced in a mouse model

PURPOSE

Preclinical studies indicate a normal tissue sparing effect when ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) radiation is used, while tumor response is maintained. This differential response has promising perspectives for improved clinical outcome. This study investigates tumor control and normal tissue toxicity of pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton FLASH in a mouse model.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Tumor bearing hind limbs of non-anaesthetized CDF1 mice were irradiated in a single fraction with a PBS proton beam using either conventional (CONV) dose rate (0.33-0.63 Gy/s field dose rate, 244 MeV) or FLASH (71-89 Gy/s field dose rate, 250 MeV). 162 mice with a C3H mouse mammary carcinoma subcutaneously implanted in the foot were irradiated with physical doses of 40-60 Gy (8-14 mice per dose point). The endpoints were tumor control (TC) assessed as no recurrent tumor at 90 days after treatment, the level of acute moist desquamation (MD) to the skin of the foot within 25 days post irradiation, and radiation induced fibrosis (RIF) within 24 weeks post irradiation.

RESULTS

TCD₅₀ (dose for 50% tumor control) was similar for CONV and FLASH with values (and 95% confidence intervals) of 49.1 (47.0-51.4) Gy for CONV and 51.3 (48.6-54.2) Gy for FLASH. RIF analysis was restricted to mice with tumor control. Both endpoints showed distinct normal tissue sparing effect of proton FLASH with MDD₅₀ (dose for 50% of mice displaying moist desquamation) of <40.1 Gy for CONV and 52.3 (50.0-54.6) Gy for FLASH, (dose modifying factor at least 1.3) and FD₅₀ (dose for 50% of mice displaying fibrosis) of 48.6 (43.2-50.8) Gy for CONV and 55.6 (52.5-60.1) Gy for FLASH (dose modifying factor of 1.14).

CONCLUSIONS

FLASH had the same tumor control as CONV, but reduced normal tissue damage assessed as acute skin damage and radiation induced fibrosis.