1
|
Milgrom SA, Dandapani SV, Wong J, Kalapurakal J, Smith KS, Han C, Simiele E, Hua CH, Fitzgerald TJ, Kry S, Wong K, Symons H, Kovalchuk N, Hiniker SM. Incorporating intensity modulated total body irradiation into a Children's Oncology Group trial: Rationale, techniques, and safeguards. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2024:e31185. [PMID: 39118225 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.31185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2024] [Revised: 06/21/2024] [Accepted: 06/22/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024]
Abstract
Historically, total body irradiation (TBI) has been delivered using static, parallel opposed photon beams (2D-TBI). Recently, centers have increasingly used intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) techniques for TBI. Relative to 2D-TBI, IMRT can reduce doses to critical organs (i.e., lungs and kidneys) while delivering myeloablative doses to the rest of the body, so it may decrease the risk of toxicity while maintaining oncologic outcomes. Despite these potential benefits, delivering TBI using IMRT introduces new challenges in treatment planning and delivery. We describe the extensive experience with IMRT-based TBI at Stanford University and City of Hope Cancer Center. These groups, and others, have reported favorable clinical outcomes and have developed methods to optimize treatment planning and delivery. A critical next step is to evaluate the broader adoption of this approach. Therefore, IMRT-based TBI will be incorporated into a prospective, multi-institutional Children's Oncology Group study with careful procedures and safeguards in place.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah A Milgrom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | | | - Jeffrey Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA
| | - John Kalapurakal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Koren S Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core-Rhode Island, UMass Chan Medical School, Lincoln, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Chunhui Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Eric Simiele
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Chia-Ho Hua
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Thomas J Fitzgerald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core-Rhode Island, UMass Chan Medical School, Lincoln, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Stephen Kry
- Division of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kenneth Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Heather Symons
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Nataliya Kovalchuk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Susan M Hiniker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Seravalli E, Bosman ME, Han C, Losert C, Pazos M, Engström PE, Engellau J, Fulcheri CPL, Zucchetti C, Saldi S, Ferrer C, Ocanto A, Hiniker SM, Clark CH, Hussein M, Misson-Yates S, Kobyzeva DA, Loginova AA, Hoeben BAW. Technical recommendations for implementation of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy and Helical Tomotherapy Total Body Irradiation. Radiother Oncol 2024; 197:110366. [PMID: 38830537 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2024] [Revised: 05/10/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Abstract
As a component of myeloablative conditioning before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), Total Body Irradiation (TBI) is employed in radiotherapy centers all over the world. In recent and coming years, many centers are changing their technical setup from a conventional TBI technique to multi-isocenter conformal arc therapy techniques such as Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) or Helical Tomotherapy (HT). These techniques allow better homogeneity and control of the target prescription dose, and provide more freedom for individualized organ-at-risk sparing. The technical design of multi-isocenter/multi-plan conformal TBI is complex and should be developed carefully. A group of early adopters with conformal TBI experience using different treatment machines and treatment planning systems came together to develop technical recommendations and share experiences, in order to assist departments wishing to implement conformal TBI, and to provide ideas for standardization of practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrica Seravalli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Mirjam E Bosman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Chunhui Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Christoph Losert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | - Montserrat Pazos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | - Per E Engström
- Department of Haematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Jacob Engellau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | | | - Claudio Zucchetti
- Section of Medical Physics, Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Simonetta Saldi
- Section of Radiation Oncology, Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Carlos Ferrer
- Department of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Abrahams Ocanto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, San Francisco de Asís University Hospital, GenesisCare, Madrid, Spain
| | - Susan M Hiniker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Catharine H Clark
- Radiotherapy Physics, National Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance Group (RTTQA), Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK; Metrology for Medical Physics Centre, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK; Radiotherapy Physics, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Medical Physics and Bioengineering Department, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mohammad Hussein
- Metrology for Medical Physics Centre, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK
| | - Sarah Misson-Yates
- Medical Physics Department, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK; UK School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK; National Physical Laboratory, Metrology for Medical Physics Centre, London, UK
| | - Daria A Kobyzeva
- Deptartment of Radiation Oncology, Dmitry Rogachev National Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Anna A Loginova
- Deptartment of Radiation Oncology, Dmitry Rogachev National Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Bianca A W Hoeben
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nelson G, Sarkar V, Szegedi M, Molineu A, Olch AJ, Kunz JN, Zhao H, Huang YJ, Pillai S, Rassiah P. Validation of Acuros for total body irradiation at extended distance. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024:e14468. [PMID: 39023298 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2024] [Revised: 05/23/2024] [Accepted: 06/20/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Standardized and accurately reported doses are essential in conventional total body irradiation (TBI), especially lung doses. This study evaluates the accuracy of the Acuros algorithm in predicting doses for extended-distance TBI. METHODS Measurements and calculations were done with both 6 and 18 MV. Tissue Maximum Ratio (TMR), output and off axis ratios (OAR) were measured at 200 and 500 cm source to detector distance and compared to Acuros calculated values. Two end-to-end tests were carried out, one with an in-house phantom (solid water and Styrofoam) with inserted ion chambers and the other was with the Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core (IROC) TBI anthropomorphic phantom equipped with TLDs. The end-to-end test was done for 6 and 18 MV both with and without lung blocks. The source to midplane distance for both phantoms were at 518 and 508 cm respectively. Lung blocks were placed at the phantom surface and a beam spoiler was positioned 30 cm from the surface of the phantoms as per our clinical set up. RESULTS The agreement between measured and calculated TMR, output and off axis ratios for both 6 and 18 MV were within 2%. Ion chamber measurements in both the Styrofoam and solid water for both energies carried out with and without lung blocks were within 2% of calculated values. TLD measured doses for both 6 and 18 MV in the IROC phantom were within 5% of calculated doses which is within the uncertainty of the TLD measurement. CONCLUSIONS The results indicate that the clinical beam model for Acuros 16.1 commissioned at standard clinical distances is capable of calculating doses accurately at extended distances up to 500 cm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geoffrey Nelson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Vikren Sarkar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Martin Szegedi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Andrea Molineu
- Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core, Houston QA Center, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Arthur J Olch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Southern California and Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jeremy N Kunz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Hui Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Y Jessica Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | | | - Prema Rassiah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ehler ED, Turcotte LM, Skamene S, Baker KS, Das SK, Constine LS, Yuan J, Dusenbery KE. Idiopathic Pneumonitis Syndrome After Total Body Irradiation in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Myeloablative Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A PENTEC Comprehensive Review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:625-639. [PMID: 36973099 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.02.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Revised: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Pulmonary complications, especially idiopathic pneumonitis syndrome (IPS), are potentially life altering or fatal sequelae of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Total body irradiation (TBI) as part of the conditioning regimen has been implicated in IPS. A comprehensive PENTEC (Pediatric Normal Tissues in the Clinic) review was performed to increase our understanding of the role of TBI in the development of acute, noninfectious IPS. METHODS AND MATERIALS A systematic literature search was conducted using the MEDLINE, PubMed, and Cochrane library databases for articles describing pulmonary toxicity in children treated with HCT. Data pertaining to TBI and pulmonary endpoints were extracted. Risk of IPS was analyzed in relation to patient age, TBI dose, fractionation, dose rate, lung shielding, timing, and type of transplant, with the goal to better understand factors associated with this complication in children undergoing HCT. A logistic regression model was developed using a subset of studies with comparable transplant regimens and sufficient TBI data. RESULTS Six studies met criteria for modeling of the correlation of TBI parameters with IPS; all consisted of pediatric patients undergoing allogeneic HCT with a cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy regimen. IPS was variably defined, but all studies that reported IPS were included in this analysis. The mean incidence of post-HCT IPS was 16% (range, 4%-41%). Mortality from IPS, when it occurred, was high (median, 50%; range, 45%-100%). Fractionated TBI prescription doses encompassed a narrow range of 9 to 14 Gy. Many differing TBI methods were reported, and there was an absence of 3-dimensional dose analysis of lung blocking techniques. Thus, a univariate correlation between IPS and total TBI dose, dose fractionation, dose rate, or TBI technique could not be made. However, a model, built from these studies based on prescribed dose using a normalized dose parameter of equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2), adjusted for dose rate, suggested correlation with the development of IPS (P = .0004). The model-predicted odds ratio for IPS was 24.3 Gy-1 (95% confidence interval, 7.0-84.3). Use of TBI lung dose metrics (eg, midlung point dose) could not be successfully modeled, potentially because of dosimetric uncertainties in the actual delivered volumetric lung dose and imperfections in our modeling process. CONCLUSIONS This PENTEC report is a comprehensive review of IPS in pediatric patients receiving fractionated TBI regimens for allogenic HCT. IPS was not clearly associated with 1 single TBI factor. Modeling using dose-rate adjusted EQD2 showed a response with IPS for allogeneic HCT using a cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy regimen. Therefore, this model suggests IPS mitigation strategies can focus on not just the dose and dose per fraction but also the dose rate used in TBI. More data are needed to confirm this model and to determine the influence of chemotherapy regimens and contribution from graft-versus-host disease. The presence of confounding variables (eg, systemic chemotherapies) that affect risk, the narrow range of fractionated TBI doses found in the literature, and limitations of other reported data (eg, lung point dose) may have prevented a more straightforward link between IPS and total dose from being observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sonia Skamene
- Division of Radiation Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - K Scott Baker
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington
| | - Shiva K Das
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Louis S Constine
- Department of Radiation Oncology, James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Webster M, Dona Lemus OM, Zheng D, Wancura JN, Tanny S, Sakthivel G, Constine L. Case study with dosimetric analysis: Total body irradiation to a patient with a left ventricular assist device. Clin Case Rep 2024; 12:e8868. [PMID: 38756618 PMCID: PMC11096280 DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.8868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2024] [Revised: 04/03/2024] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Key Clinical Message A patient presented with cardiogenic shock, requiring the implantation of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD), and acute myeloblastic leukemia. This necessitated total body irradiation (TBI) while balancing dose reduction to the LVAD components to avoid potential radiation damage. Here we outline our treatment approach and dose estimates to the LVAD. Abstract This case report discusses the delivery of TBI to a patient with an LVAD. This treatment required radiation-dose determinations and consequential reductions for the heart, LVAD, and an external controller connected to the LVAD. The patient was treated using a traditional 16MV anterior posterior (AP)/posterior anterior (PA) technique at a source-to-surface-distance of 515 cm for 400 cGy in two fractions. A 3 cm thick Cerrobend block was placed on the beam spoiler to reduce dose to the heart and LVAD to 150 cGy. The external controller was placed in a 1 cm thick acrylic box to reduce neutron dose and positioned as far from the treatment fields as achievable. In vivo measurements were made using optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs) placed inside the box at distances of 2 cm, 8.5 cm, and 14 cm from the field edge, and on the patient along the central axis and centered behind the LVAD block. Further ion chamber measurements were made using a solid water phantom to more accurately estimate the dose delivered to the LVAD. Neutron dose measurements were also conducted. The total estimated dose to the controller ranged from 135.3 cGy to 91.5 cGy. The LVAD block reduced the surface dose to the patient to 271.6 cGy (68.1%). The block transmission factors of the 3 cm Cerrobend block measured in the phantom were 45% at 1 cm depth and decreased asymptotically to around 30% at 3 cm depth. Applying these transmission factors to the in vivo measurements yielded a dose of 120 cGy to the implanted device. The neutron dose the LVAD region is estimated around 0.46 cGy. Physical limitations of the controller made it impossible to completely avoid dose. Shielding is recommended. The block had limited dose reduction to the surface, due to secondary particles, but appropriately reduced the dose at 3 cm and beyond. More research on LVADs dose limits would be beneficial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Webster
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterNew YorkUSA
| | - Olga M. Dona Lemus
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterNew YorkUSA
| | - Dandan Zheng
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterNew YorkUSA
| | - Joshua N. Wancura
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterNew YorkUSA
| | - Sean Tanny
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterNew YorkUSA
| | - Gukan Sakthivel
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterNew YorkUSA
| | - Louis Constine
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterNew YorkUSA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Burmeister JW, Bossenberger T, Nalichowski A, Hammoud A, Baran G, Dominello MM. Total body irradiation delivered using a dedicated Co-60 TBI unit: Evaluation of dosimetric uniformity and dose verification. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024; 25:e14188. [PMID: 37910646 PMCID: PMC10860458 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Revised: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023] Open
Abstract
This work presents the dosimetric characteristics of Total Body Irradiation (TBI) delivered using a dedicated Co-60 TBI unit. We demonstrate the ability to deliver a uniform dose to the entire patient without the need for a beam spoiler or patient-specific compensation. Full dose distributions are calculated using an in-house Monte Carlo treatment planning system, and cumulative dose distributions are created by deforming the dose distributions within two different patient orientations. Sample dose distributions and profiles are provided to illustrate the plan characteristics, and dose and DVH statistics are provided for a heterogeneous cohort of patients. The patient cohort includes adult and pediatric patients with a range of 132-198 cm in length and 16.5-37.5 cm in anterior-posterior thickness. With the exception of the lungs, a uniform dose of 12 Gy is delivered to the patient with nearly the entire volume receiving a dose within 10% of the prescription dose. Mean lung doses (MLDs) are maintained below the estimated threshold for radiation pneumonitis, with MLDs ranging from 7.3 to 9.3 Gy (estimated equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2 ) of 6.2-8.5 Gy). Dose uniformity is demonstrated across five anatomical locations within the patient for which mean doses are all within 3.1% of the prescription dose. In-vivo dosimetry demonstrates excellent agreement between measured and calculated doses, with 78% of measurements within ±5% of the calculated dose and 99% within ±10%. These results demonstrate a state-of-the-art TBI planning and delivery system using a dedicated TBI unit and hybrid in-house and commercial planning techniques which provide comprehensive dosimetric data for TBI treatment plans that are accurately verified using in-vivo dosimetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jay W. Burmeister
- Department of OncologyWayne State University School of MedicineDetroitMichiganUSA
- Gershenson Radiation Oncology CenterBarbara Ann Karmanos Cancer InstituteDetroitMichiganUSA
| | - Todd Bossenberger
- Gershenson Radiation Oncology CenterBarbara Ann Karmanos Cancer InstituteDetroitMichiganUSA
| | - Adrian Nalichowski
- Department of OncologyWayne State University School of MedicineDetroitMichiganUSA
- Gershenson Radiation Oncology CenterBarbara Ann Karmanos Cancer InstituteDetroitMichiganUSA
| | - Ahmad Hammoud
- Gershenson Radiation Oncology CenterBarbara Ann Karmanos Cancer InstituteDetroitMichiganUSA
| | - Geoff Baran
- Gershenson Radiation Oncology CenterBarbara Ann Karmanos Cancer InstituteDetroitMichiganUSA
| | - Michael M. Dominello
- Department of OncologyWayne State University School of MedicineDetroitMichiganUSA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kalapurakal JA, Wolden SL, Haas-Kogan D, Laack NN, Hua CH, Paulino AC, Hill-Kayser CE, Hoppe BS, Fitzgerald TJ. Children's Oncology Group's 2023 blueprint for research: Radiation oncology. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2023; 70 Suppl 6:e30593. [PMID: 37486145 PMCID: PMC10588230 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.30593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023]
Abstract
Radiation oncology is an integral part of the multidisciplinary team caring for children with cancer. The primary goal of our committee is to enable the delivery of the safest dose of radiation therapy (RT) with the maximal potential for cure, and to minimize toxicity in children by delivering lower doses to normal tissues using advanced technologies like intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) and proton therapy. We provide mentorship for y ators and are actively involved in educating the global radiation oncology community. We are leaders in the effort to discover novel radiosensitizers, radioprotectors, and advanced RT technologies that could help improve outcomes of children with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Chia-ho Hua
- St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Köksal M, Özkan O, Holderried T, Heine A, Brossart P, Gawish A, Scafa D, Sarria GR, Leitzen C, Schmeel LC, Müdder T. Optimized Conformal Total Body Irradiation with VMAT Using a Linear-Accelerator-Based Radiosurgery Treatment System in Comparison to the Golden Standard Helical TomoTherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4220. [PMID: 37686498 PMCID: PMC10486387 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15174220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2023] [Revised: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Modern irradiation techniques for optimized conformal TBI can be realized by Helical Tomotherapy (HT) or Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT), depending on the availability of suitable specialized equipment. In this dosimetric planning study, we compared both modalities and addressed the question of whether VMAT with small field sizes is also suitable as a backup in case of HT equipment malfunctions. For this purpose, we retrospectively used planning computed tomography (CT) data from 10 patients treated with HT with a total dose of 8 Gy (n = 5) or 12 Gy (n = 5) for treatment planning for VMAT with a small field size (36 × 22 cm). The target volume coverage, dose homogeneity at target volume, and dose reduction in organs at risk (OAR) (lungs, kidneys, lenses) were analyzed and compared. One patient was irradiated with both modalities due to a device failure of the HT equipment during the study, which facilitated a comparison in a real clinical setting. The findings indicate that in addition to a higher mean dose to the lenses in the 12 Gy group for VMAT and a better dose homogeneity in the target volume for HT, comparably good and adequate target dose coverage and dose reduction in the other OAR could be achieved for both modalities, with significantly longer treatment times for VMAT. In conclusion, after appropriate optimization of the treatment times, VMAT using linear accelerator radiosurgery technology can be used both as a backup in addition to HT and in clinical routines to perform optimized conformal TBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mümtaz Köksal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Oğuzhan Özkan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Tobias Holderried
- Department of Internal Medicine—Oncology, Hematology and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany (P.B.)
| | - Annkristin Heine
- Department of Internal Medicine—Oncology, Hematology and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany (P.B.)
| | - Peter Brossart
- Department of Internal Medicine—Oncology, Hematology and Rheumatology, University Hospital of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany (P.B.)
| | - Ahmed Gawish
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Marburg, 35043 Marburg, Germany
| | - Davide Scafa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Gustavo R. Sarria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Christina Leitzen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Leonard C. Schmeel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| | - Thomas Müdder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Misson-Yates S, Cunningham R, Gonzalez R, Diez P, Clark CH. Optimised conformal total body irradiation: a heterogeneous practice, so where next? Br J Radiol 2023; 96:20220650. [PMID: 36475820 PMCID: PMC10078861 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20220650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The use of volumetric arc therapy and inverse planning has been in routine use in radiotherapy for two decades. However, use in total body irradiation (TBI) has been more recent and few guidelines exist as to how to plan or verify. This has led to heterogeneous approaches. The goal of this review is to provide an overview of current advanced planning and dosimetry verification protocols used in optimised conformal TBI as a basis for investigating the need for greater standardisation in TBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Misson-Yates
- Department of Medical Physics, Guy's Cancer Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rissa Cunningham
- Department of Medical Physics, Guy's Cancer Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Regina Gonzalez
- Department of Medical Physics, Guy's Cancer Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Patricia Diez
- Radiotherapy Physics, National Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance Group (RTTQA), Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK
| | - Catharine H Clark
- Radiotherapy Physics, National Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance Group (RTTQA), Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK
- Metrology for Medical Physics Centre, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK
- Radiotherapy Physics, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Medical Physics and Bioengineering Department, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Full Body Surface Coverage with Water-Equivalent Bolus as Novel Technique for Total Body Irradiation before Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Pediatric Acute Lymphoid Leukemia. CHILDREN 2022; 9:children9111740. [DOI: 10.3390/children9111740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Revised: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background: Total body irradiation (TBI) 2 × 2 Gy for 3 consecutive days followed by chemotherapy for conditioning pediatric patients with acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL) before bone marrow transplantation is superior to chemo-conditioning alone. The globally used anterior-posterior/posterior-anterior (AP/PA) technique is the most referable method, but volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with modern linear accelerators is more precise in terms of ensuring better dose distribution, especially for skin, and higher protection of organs at risk, resulting in less side effects. Method: For TBI, a modern VMAT technique was used. Whole-body immobilization in the supine position was performed using a vacuum mattress with a full body coverage, with a water-equivalent bolus of 1 cm thickness. The design goal was to achieve dose inhomogeneity of less than ±10%. Results: From 2020 to 2022, we performed TBI for five pediatric patients with ALL, with full body bolus and VMAT, who later received hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. No acute complications related to TBI were observed during the treatment period with a median follow-up of 1.27 (0.43–2.11) years. Conclusion: Using full body water-equivalent bolus with VMAT for TBI provides a safe method for children with a better organ sparing in the short term follow-up.
Collapse
|
11
|
Hoeben BAW, Pazos M, Seravalli E, Bosman ME, Losert C, Albert MH, Boterberg T, Ospovat I, Mico Milla S, Demiroz Abakay C, Engellau J, Jóhannesson V, Kos G, Supiot S, Llagostera C, Bierings M, Scarzello G, Seiersen K, Smith E, Ocanto A, Ferrer C, Bentzen SM, Kobyzeva DA, Loginova AA, Janssens GO. ESTRO ACROP and SIOPE recommendations for myeloablative Total Body Irradiation in children. Radiother Oncol 2022; 173:119-133. [PMID: 35661674 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.05.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Myeloablative Total Body Irradiation (TBI) is an important modality in conditioning for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), especially in children with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). TBI practices are heterogeneous and institution-specific. Since TBI is associated with multiple late adverse effects, recommendations may help to standardize practices and improve the outcome versus toxicity ratio for children. MATERIAL AND METHODS The European Society for Paediatric Oncology (SIOPE) Radiotherapy TBI Working Group together with ESTRO experts conducted a literature search and evaluation regarding myeloablative TBI techniques and toxicities in children. Findings were discussed in bimonthly virtual meetings and consensus recommendations were established. RESULTS Myeloablative TBI in HSCT conditioning is mostly performed for high-risk ALL patients or patients with recurring hematologic malignancies. TBI is discouraged in children <3-4 years old because of increased toxicity risk. Publications regarding TBI are mostly retrospective studies with level III-IV evidence. Preferential TBI dose in children is 12-14.4 Gy in 1.6-2 Gy fractions b.i.d. Dose reduction should be considered for the lungs to <8 Gy, for the kidneys to ≤10 Gy, and for the lenses to <12 Gy, for dose rates ≥6 cGy/min. Highly conformal techniques i.e. TomoTherapy and VMAT TBI or Total Marrow (and/or Lymphoid) Irradiation as implemented in several centers, improve dose homogeneity and organ sparing, and should be evaluated in studies. CONCLUSIONS These ESTRO ACROP SIOPE recommendations provide expert consensus for conventional and highly conformal myeloablative TBI in children, as well as a supporting literature overview of TBI techniques and toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bianca A W Hoeben
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands; Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Montserrat Pazos
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | - Enrica Seravalli
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Mirjam E Bosman
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Christoph Losert
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | - Michael H Albert
- Dept. of Pediatrics, Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | - Tom Boterberg
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Inna Ospovat
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Soraya Mico Milla
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Candan Demiroz Abakay
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Uludag University Faculty of Medicine Hospital, Bursa, Turkey
| | - Jacob Engellau
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | | | - Gregor Kos
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Stéphane Supiot
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes St. Herblain, France
| | - Camille Llagostera
- Dept. of Medical Physics, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes St. Herblain, France
| | - Marc Bierings
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Giovanni Scarzello
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Veneto Institute of Oncology-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | | | - Ed Smith
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Abrahams Ocanto
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carlos Ferrer
- Dept. of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Søren M Bentzen
- Dept. of Epidemiology and Public Health, Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States
| | - Daria A Kobyzeva
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Dmitry Rogachev National Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Anna A Loginova
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Dmitry Rogachev National Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Geert O Janssens
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands; Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Loginova AA, Tovmasian DA, Lisovskaya AO, Kobyzeva DA, Maschan MA, Chernyaev AP, Egorov OB, Nechesnyuk AV. Optimized Conformal Total Body Irradiation methods with Helical TomoTherapy and Elekta VMAT: Implementation, Imaging, Planning and Dose Delivery for Pediatric Patients. Front Oncol 2022; 12:785917. [PMID: 35359412 PMCID: PMC8960917 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.785917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Optimized conformal total body irradiation (OC-TBI) is a highly conformal image guided method for irradiating the whole human body while sparing the selected organs at risk (OARs) (lungs, kidneys, lens). This study investigated the safety and feasibility of pediatric OC-TBI with the helical TomoTherapy (TomoTherapy) and volumetric modulated arc (VMAT) modalities and their implementation in routine clinical practice. This is the first study comparing the TomoTherapy and VMAT modalities in terms of treatment planning, dose delivery accuracy, and toxicity for OC-TBI in a single-center setting. The OC-TBI method with standardized dosimetric criteria was developed and implemented with TomoTherapy. The same OC-TBI approach was applied for VMAT. Standardized treatment steps, namely, positioning and immobilization, contouring, treatment planning strategy, plan evaluation, quality assurance, visualization and treatment delivery procedure were implemented for 157 patients treated with TomoTherapy and 52 patients treated with VMAT. Both modalities showed acceptable quality of the planned target volume dose coverage with simultaneous OARs sparing. The homogeneity of target irradiation was superior for TomoTherapy. Overall assessment of the OC-TBI dose delivery was performed for 30 patients treated with VMAT and 30 patients treated with TomoTherapy. The planned and delivered (sum of doses for all fractions) doses were compared for the two modalities in groups of patients with different heights. The near maximum dose values of the lungs and kidneys showed the most significant variation between the planned and delivered doses for both modalities. Differences in the patient size did not result in statistically significant differences for most of the investigated parameters in either the TomoTherapy or VMAT modality. TomoTherapy-based OC-TBI showed lower variations between planned and delivered doses, was less time-consuming and was easier to implement in routine practice than VMAT. We did not observe significant differences in acute and subacute toxicity between TomoTherapy and VMAT groups. The late toxicity from kidneys and lungs was not found during the 2.3 years follow up period. The study demonstrates that both modalities are feasible, safe and show acceptable toxicity. The standardized approaches allowed us to implement pediatric OC-TBI in routine clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Anzorovna Loginova
- Dmitry Rogachev National Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia
- *Correspondence: Anna Anzorovna Loginova,
| | - Diana Anatolievna Tovmasian
- Dmitry Rogachev National Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia
- Faculty of Physics, Federal State Budget Educational Institution of Higher Education, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - Daria Alexeevna Kobyzeva
- Dmitry Rogachev National Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - Alexander Petrovich Chernyaev
- Faculty of Physics, Federal State Budget Educational Institution of Higher Education, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kovalchuk N, Simiele E, Skinner L, Yang Y, Howell N, Lewis J, Hui C, Blomain ES, Hoppe RT, Hiniker SM. The Stanford VMAT TBI Technique. Pract Radiat Oncol 2022; 12:245-258. [PMID: 35182803 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2021.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2021] [Revised: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 12/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In this work, we describe the technical aspects of the XXX VMAT TBI technique, compare it to other VMAT TBI techniques, and share our initial experience. METHODS From September 2019 to August 2021, 35 patients were treated with VMAT TBI at our institution. Treatment planning was performed using in-house developed automated planning scripts. Organ sparing depended on the regimen: myeloablative (lungs, kidneys, and lenses); non-myeloablative with benign disease (lungs, kidneys, lenses, gonads, brain, and thyroid). Quality assurance was performed using EPID portal dosimetry and Mobius3D. Robustness was evaluated for the first ten patients by performing local and global isocenter shifts of 5 mm. Treatment was delivered using IGRT for every isocenter and every fraction. In-vivo measurements were performed on the matchline between the VMAT and AP/PA fields and on the testes for the first fraction. RESULTS The lungs, lungs-1cm, and kidneys Dmean were consistently spared to 57.6±4.4%, 40.7±5.5%, and 70.0±9.9% of the prescription dose, respectively. Gonadal sparing (Dmean=0.69±0.13 Gy) was performed for all patients with benign disease. The average PTV D1cc was 120.7±6.4% for all patients. The average Gamma passing rate for the VMAT plans was 98.1±1.6% (criteria of 3%/2mm). Minimal differences were observed between Mobius3D- and EclipseAAA-calculated PTV Dmean (0.0±0.3%) and lungs Dmean (-2.5±1.2%). Robustness evaluation showed that the PTV Dmax and lungs Dmean are insensitive to small positioning deviations between the VMAT isocenters (1.1±2.4% and 1.2±1.0%, respectively). The average matchline dose measurement indicated patient setup was reproducible (96.1±4.5% relative to prescription dose). Treatment time, including patient setup and beam-on, was 47.5±9.5 min. CONCLUSIONS The XXX VMAT TBI technique, from simulation to treatment delivery, was presented and compared to other VMAT TBI techniques. Together with publicly shared autoplanning scripts, our technique may provide the gateway for wider adaptation of this technology and the possibility of multi-institutional studies in the cooperative group setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nataliya Kovalchuk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States
| | - Eric Simiele
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States
| | - Lawrie Skinner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States
| | - Yong Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States
| | - Nicole Howell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States
| | - Jonathan Lewis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States
| | - Caressa Hui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States
| | - Erik S Blomain
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States
| | - Richard T Hoppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States
| | - Susan M Hiniker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hoeben BAW, Wong JYC, Fog LS, Losert C, Filippi AR, Bentzen SM, Balduzzi A, Specht L. Total Body Irradiation in Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Paediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia: Review of the Literature and Future Directions. Front Pediatr 2021; 9:774348. [PMID: 34926349 PMCID: PMC8678472 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2021.774348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Total body irradiation (TBI) has been a pivotal component of the conditioning regimen for allogeneic myeloablative haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in very-high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) for decades, especially in children and young adults. The myeloablative conditioning regimen has two aims: (1) to eradicate leukaemic cells, and (2) to prevent rejection of the graft through suppression of the recipient's immune system. Radiotherapy has the advantage of achieving an adequate dose effect in sanctuary sites and in areas with poor blood supply. However, radiotherapy is subject to radiobiological trade-offs between ALL cell destruction, immune and haematopoietic stem cell survival, and various adverse effects in normal tissue. To diminish toxicity, a shift from single-fraction to fractionated TBI has taken place. However, HSCT and TBI are still associated with multiple late sequelae, leaving room for improvement. This review discusses the past developments of TBI and considerations for dose, fractionation and dose-rate, as well as issues regarding TBI setup performance, limitations and possibilities for improvement. TBI is typically delivered using conventional irradiation techniques and centres have locally developed heterogeneous treatment methods and ways to achieve reduced doses in several organs. There are, however, limitations in options to shield organs at risk without compromising the anti-leukaemic and immunosuppressive effects of conventional TBI. Technological improvements in radiotherapy planning and delivery with highly conformal TBI or total marrow irradiation (TMI), and total marrow and lymphoid irradiation (TMLI) have opened the way to investigate the potential reduction of radiotherapy-related toxicities without jeopardising efficacy. The demonstration of the superiority of TBI compared with chemotherapy-only conditioning regimens for event-free and overall survival in the randomised For Omitting Radiation Under Majority age (FORUM) trial in children with high-risk ALL makes exploration of the optimal use of TBI delivery mandatory. Standardisation and comprehensive reporting of conventional TBI techniques as well as cooperation between radiotherapy centres may help to increase the ratio between treatment outcomes and toxicity, and future studies must determine potential added benefit of innovative conformal techniques to ultimately improve quality of life for paediatric ALL patients receiving TBI-conditioned HSCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bianca A. W. Hoeben
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Jeffrey Y. C. Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA, United States
| | - Lotte S. Fog
- Alfred Health Radiation Oncology, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Christoph Losert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Andrea R. Filippi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo and University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Søren M. Bentzen
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Adriana Balduzzi
- Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, Clinica Paediatrica Università degli Studi di Milano Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Lena Specht
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|