Current indications for laparoscopy in day-case surgery

The Impact of Pediatric Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair in a Community Based Children's Ambulatory Surgery Center - It's Safe and Effective

PURPOSE

Pediatric surgery in a free-standing children's ambulatory surgery center (C-ASC) is a common practice. The implementation of minimally invasive surgery in this setting may be associated with unique challenges. The purpose of this study was to compare a cohort of children who underwent laparoscopic (LHR) and open inguinal hernia repairs (OHR) at the C-ASC as part of a quality assurance initiative to assess safety and efficacy.

METHODS

From January 2021 to December 2021, the records of all children who underwent LHR or OHR at our C-ASC were analyzed. The following data was retrieved and compared with the Student's t-test: age, weight, gender, procedure type, total room time (RT), total operative time (OT), and outcomes.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight (n = 88) children underwent LHR or OHR during this period. There was no difference between the two groups regarding their age or weight. Both groups had equal outcomes, specifically, no wound infections or recurrent hernias. (2.5 year follow-up). There was a significant reduction in RT and OT in those children who underwent unilateral LHR compared to unilateral OHR (15% and 17% respectively, p < 0.05). In those children who underwent bilateral LHR and bilateral OHR, there was a reduction in RT and OT in the LHR group compared to OHR, but it was not significant (10% and 12% respectively, p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric LHR is safe and effective in the C-ASC. The unilateral LHR technique is associated with a significant reduction in total room time and operative time compared to the unilateral OHR technique. Additional analyses would be important to examine the relationship of time and outcomes in this setting.

TYPE OF STUDY

Original Research Retrospective Case-control study.

Analysis of Factors Associated with Same-Day Discharge After Robotic Transversus Abdominis Release for Incisional Hernia Repairs

Background: Advancement in surgery has shifted numerous procedures to a same-day discharge (SDD) setting. In this study, we evaluated factors related to SDD after robotic transversus abdominis release (rTAR). Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained hernia databank was performed. Patients who underwent rTAR for incisional hernias were assigned to either the SDD group (length of stay [LOS] <1) or the inpatient group (LOS ≥1 day). Pre-, intra-, and postoperative variables were compared. Predictors of SDD were explored through a logistic regression, and a mediation analysis was performed to assess their effect on the LOS. Results: Out of the 167 patients included, 53 patients were discharged the same day. Age, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, history of coronary artery disease, and wound infection were significantly higher in the inpatient group. Overall, median LOS was 1 (0-2). Postoperative complications did not differ between SDD and inpatient groups except for Clavien-Dindo Grade-II (1 versus 14, respectively; P = .039). Thirty-day readmission rates were comparable (P = .229). A binary logistic regression to predict factors associated with SDD rTAR showed statistical significance in age, operative time, mesh area, and history of wound infection. Mediation analysis showed that mesh size indirectly affected the LOS through the operative time (a = 0.54; b = 0.46; P < .001). An age >46-year-old, an operative time beyond 217 minutes, and a mesh size >475 cm² increased the probability of an inpatient stay (area-under-the-receiver operating characteristic curves: 0.69, 0.81, and 0.82, respectively). Conclusion: The pre- and intraoperative factors associated with SDD rTAR were age, history of wound infection, operative time, and mesh area. Further studies are needed to investigate the appropriateness of discharge decisions while balancing patients' benefits, resource utilization, and costs.

Impact of COVID-19 on clinical outcomes of robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repair

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the healthcare sector and forced hospitals to limit the number of elective procedures with the goal of reducing overcrowding of wards and thus viral transmission. Recent trends for ventral hernia repair have shifted towards retromuscular techniques, which normally require a longer length of stay. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on clinical outcomes of robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repair (rRVHR).

METHODS

Patients who underwent rRVHR up to 600 days before and after March 10, 2020, were included in this retrospective study and assigned to the pre- or post-COVID group depending on the date of their procedure. Pre-, intra-, and postoperative variables including patients' demographics, hernia characteristics, complications, and hernia recurrence were compared between both groups.

RESULTS

153 (46% female) and 141 (51% female) patients were assigned to the pre- and post-COVID groups respectively. Median age was statistically different between both groups [pre-COVID: 57 (48-68) vs. post-COVID 55 (42-64) years, p = 0.045]. Median hospital length of stay (LOS) was 0 day (0-1) in both groups, and same day discharge were 61% pre-pandemic and 70% post-pandemic (p = 0.09). Mean postoperative follow-up was 39.2 (4.1-93.6) months. In total, 26 pre-COVID patients had postoperative complications, out of which 7 were pulmonary complications, whereas 23 complications were recorded in the post-COVID group, with only 3 pulmonary complications (p = 0.88). Rate of surgical-site events was comparable between both groups, and no recurrences were recorded.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to describe the impact of the COVID-19 on rRVHR. Hospital LOS was comparable between both groups. Rates of medical and hernia specific complications were not altered by the pandemic.

Day-case robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: Feasibility and safety

OBJECTIVE

The delivery of surgical services has undergone a shift in the past decade with increasing numbers of surgeries being performed in the daycare setting. Implementing a minimally invasive surgical approach with a robot with an enhanced recovery protocol permits robot-assisted laparoscopic surgeries (RALS) to be performed as a day-case (DC) procedure. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of DC surgery according to our experience.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this prospective observational study, 43 patients underwent DC RALS performed by a single surgeon over 18 months [simple nephrectomy (n=7), radical nephrectomy (n=15), radical nephrectomy with para-aortic lymphadenectomy (n=5), and adrenalectomy (n=5)]. In addition, reconstructive urological procedures that included pyeloplasty (n=9), ureteroureterostomy (n=1), and bladder diverticulectomy with ureteric re-implantation (n=1) were performed as DC surgeries during this study period. RALS was performed in the standard way with an enhanced recovery pathway of care for DC. We collected data regarding the demographic information, medical comorbidities, preoperative outcomes, intraoperative outcomes, complications, length of stay, and readmission rates. The data were analyzed and evaluated.

RESULTS

All the patients (100%) were successfully discharged on the same day with no major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade>I). The readmission rates were 0%.

CONCLUSION

DC RALS are safe and feasible with an enhanced recovery protocol. With adequate protocols in place, these surgeries might prove to be better than the available minimally invasive techniques and can become the standard of care in the future.

Is It Safe to Recommend Cholecystectomy Whenever Gallstones Develop After Bariatric Surgery?

BACKGROUND

Cholelithiasis (ChL) is common after bariatric surgery (BS). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), the preferential treatment, is usually recommended only to symptomatic patients. LC may be, however, beneficial to asymptomatic patients as well. A prerequisite to such a policy is that it must be safe. This study aimed to assess whether, in post-bariatric (Post-Bar) patients who develop gallstones, LC achieves the same results as those reported in the general population.

METHODS

A cohort of 376 patients undergoing elective LC had their medical records reviewed. Patients were divided into non-bariatric (Non-Bar) and Post-Bar groups, and then compared for characteristics and surgical outcomes.

RESULTS

The study included 367 patients, 292 Non-Bar and 75 Post-Bar. Considering characteristics, Post-Bar patients were younger (44.5 ± 11.8 vs 48.4 ± 14.1) and less symptomatic (2.4% vs 19.8%) and had a higher BMI (32.2 ± 4.8 vs 30.8 ± 4.4) than Non-Bar patients. Regarding surgical outcomes, mortality (none), morbidity (1%, only in Non-Bar patients), readmission (1%, only in Non-Bar patients), conversion to laparotomy (0.6%, only in Non-Bar patients) showed no difference between the groups. Operative time (42.6 ± 14.4 min in Non-Bar and 38.2 ± 12.6 min in Post-Bar patients) tended to be lower in Post-Bar patients, p = 0.054. Same-day discharge was higher in Post-Bar patients (98.6%) than in Non-Bar patients (90.4%), p = 0.03.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with Non-Bar patients, LC in Post-Bar patients showed not only similar morbimortality, readmissions, and conversions but also even a higher same-day discharge rate and a trend to lower operative times.

Feasibility and cost effectiveness of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A retrospective cohort study

Ambulatory surgery is an efficient, safe and widely performed procedure; this study would shows the advantages of the ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedure from the point of view of patients and the Hospital/National Health System. Materials and Methods: Single-center retrospective cohort study including 288 patients who underwent laparoscopic-cholecystectomy at **** from January 2016 to July 2018. Ambulatory LC were compared to well-matched inpatient procedures performed in the same study period. The primary endpoints was the 30-day readmission rate. Secondary endpoints were the discharge rate in the ambulatory group, the post-operative complications rate and cost effectiveness. Results: 120/288 (41.7%) patients underwent ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Thirty-two (26.7%) patients who underwent ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy had major preoperative comorbidities and 35 (29.2%) had undergone prior abdominal surgery. The readmission rates for ambulatory patients and inpatients were 0.8% and 1.7% (p = 0.56), respectively; 104 (86.7%) ambulatory patients were discharged successfully on the same day. The two groups showed the same post-operative complication rate (p = 0.40). Ambulatory procedures resulted in related cost savings of more than 300% for the hospital and a remarkable financial benefit for the National Italian Healthcare System, accounting for savings exceeding € 27 000 per year. Conclusions: Ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe and cost effective. Since a third of ambulatory patients showed comorbidity or previous abdominal surgery, we believe that this procedure may be performed safely in a tertiary HPB centre, even in complex patients.

Day-case laparoscopic nephrectomy: Feasibility and safety

Purpose:

The method of surgery and its recovery play an important part in a success of any surgery. Implementing a minimal invasive approach with enhanced recovery protocol permits Nephrectomy to be performed as a day-case (DC) procedure. Here we report our initial experience with laparoscopic nephrectomy (LN) as DC surgery with an aim to assess its feasibility and safety.

Patients and methods:

In this retrospective observational study, nine patients underwent DC LN performed by a single surgeon (NR). LN was performed in the standard way followed by enhanced recovery pathway of care for DC. We collected data regarding demographic information, medical co-morbidities, preoperative outcomes, complications and readmission rates. The data was analysed and evaluated.

Results:

There were four (44.4%) women and five (55.5%) men with a median age of 35 years (range 17–52 years). Eight (88.9%) patients had benign diseases associated with non-functioning kidneys and one (11.1%) patient had a renal tumour. All patients (100%) were successfully discharged the same day with no major complication (Clavien Dindo Grade > I). Readmission rates were 0%.

Conclusion:

In our small series, DC LN is feasible and safe with a belief that the results are easily reproducible. Increasing experience in laparoscopic surgery with implementation of enhanced recovery protocol may help to increase the success rate of LN as DC.

Perioperative factors that contribute to postoperative pain and/or nausea and vomiting in ambulatory laparoscopic surgery

INTRODUCTION

Both postoperative pain and postoperative nausea and vomiting are major factors that determine the time and quality of recovery in laparoscopic surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the perioperative factors that contribute to the appearance of postoperative pain and postoperative nausea and vomiting in outpatient laparoscopic surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective study was conducted on a cohort of 297 patients undergoing laparoscopic ambulatory surgery. A record was made of preoperative factors (usual medication, anaesthetic risk, etc.), intraoperative (surgical and anaesthetic times, drugs, CO₂ pressure, etc.), and postoperative factors (major and minor complications, recovery times, etc.). As dependent variables, the postoperative symptoms considered were, nausea, vomiting, and/or postoperative pain.

RESULTS

Considering as a combined variable the occurrence of níusea, vomiting or moderate/severe pain (4 or more points on a visual analogue scale), one or more of these symptoms occurred in 58.7% of the patients (95% CI: 52.8-64.4). Using a logistic regression, the variables associated with the appearance of symptoms were: female gender (OR: 3.4), waiting time over 45minutes prior to surgery (OR: 4.9) and no anti-emetic prophylaxis (OR: 12.2).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing ambulatory laparoscopic surgery, one in 4had postoperative nausea and vomiting, and approximately half of moderate-intensity pain before discharge. Considering the overall the occurrence of pain and/or postoperative níusea and vomiting, these symptoms affect more than half of the patients being operated on, and are more frequent in women and in those who have to wait to access the operating room.

Day surgery versus overnight stay laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic cholecystectomies are being increasingly performed as a day surgery procedure.

AIM

To systematically assess the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a day surgery procedure compared to overnight stay.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials and clinical controlled trials involving day surgery laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included in a systematic literature search. Two authors independently assessed the studies for inclusion and extracted the data. A meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the safety and feasibility of day surgery compared to overnight stay laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

RESULTS

Twelve studies were selected for our meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference between the two groups on morbidity (P=0.65). The mean in-hospital admission and readmission rates were 13.1% and 2.4% in the day surgery group, respectively. The two groups had similar prolonged hospitalization (P=0.27), readmission rate (P=0.58) and consultation rate (P=0.73). In addition, there was no significant difference in the visual analogue scale score, postoperative nausea and vomiting scale, time to return to activity and work between the two groups (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Currently available evidence demonstrates that laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be performed safely in selected patients as a day surgery procedure, though further studies are needed.

Patients' perspective on day case breast surgery

BACKGROUND

This study assessed the views of patients undergoing breast surgery for breast cancer with a planned overnight stay, asking whether they would be happy to be discharged home on the same day of surgery.

METHODS

A structured questionnaire sent out in the 6 weeks following surgery was used to ascertain the patients' views.

RESULTS

The majority of patients undergoing mastectomy and axillary node clearance preferred an overnight stay, primarily for psychological reasons.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery were more prepared to go home on the day of surgery.

Management of superficial abscesses: scope for day case surgery

Background. Patients presenting with superficial abscesses are often regarded as low priority and given a less efficient service. Aim. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficiency of emergency treatment of superficial abscesses and to identify areas for service improvement. Method. A retrospective case review of patients admitted to Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, over a four-month period. Results. Ninety-seven patients were included in the study. Seventy two (74%) arrived between 08.00 and 16.00 hours. Overall, 75 patients (77%) were referred on weekdays with 22 patients (23%) during weekends. Seventy-two patients (74%) had treatment under a general anaesthetic. Sixty-three percent of operations occurred within the working day. The time interval between admission and surgery ranged from 52 minutes to 38 hours (mean ± SD 16 ± 9.15). The length of admission ranged from 5.3 hours to 11 days (mean 36 hours). Of the one hundred overnight beds used by the 97 patients, 30 nights were spent awaiting surgery and 70 following surgery and awaiting discharge. Conclusion. Eighty-nine percent of the patients would have been suitable for treatment as day cases. This review shows that a simple service redesign has the potential of reducing inpatient bed occupancy and improving the patient's journey.

Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair in an ambulatory surgery-extended recovery centre: a review of 259 consecutive cases

PURPOSE

The high prevalence of incisional hernias and an average stay of 3-10 days for open procedures have made this pathology both a health problem and an economic issue. A protocol was developed for performing this procedure in an Ambulatory Surgery Center (ASC) with extended recovery.

METHODS

From January 2000 to December 2011, data about all laparoscopic incisional hernia repairs were gathered prospectively. The patients' clinical features, hernia type, intraoperative and postoperative complications and reasons for hospital admission are studied.

RESULTS

A total of 259 patients have been operated for incisional hernia (185) or recurrent hernioplasty (74) in our ASC. Laparoscopic repair was successful in 254 patients (98.07 %). Conversion to open surgery was necessary in five patients (1.93 %). A total of 50 patients (19.69 %) in whom surgery was completed laparoscopically were discharged the same day of surgery, 179 (70.47 %) at 24 h and 25 (9.84 %) required a stay of over 24 h. Postoperative pain was severe in 10 % of patients, moderate in 40 %, and mild in 50 %. Complications, mostly minor and self-limiting, were observed in 25 patients (9.84 %) during hospital stay. Five major complications that occured were: bile peritonitis, an acute peritonitis, due to an inadvertent intestinal perforation, and one intestinal obstruction by partial detachment of the mesh, an intra-abdominal hematoma and a colo-cutaneous fistula. There were no deaths in the series. The mean follow-up of patients was 29.35 months (range 12-129 months). The recurrence rate was 7.03 % (n = 18). Four trocar-site hernias were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

It is essential to create a protocol with selection criteria that take into account the patient, his entourage, the anesthetic-surgical procedure, and a team dedicated to surgical laparoscopic surgery in an ASC with extended recovery to achieve good results in terms of morbidity and patient safety.

Day-case laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication

INTRODUCTION

For day-case laparoscopic surgery to be successful, patient selection is of the utmost importance. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of day-case laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and to identify factors that may lead to readmission and overstay.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients who underwent day-case laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication over a 4-year period (2006 through 2010) was undertaken. Patient age, social circumstances, and other demographics were recorded as well as any comorbidities and ASA score. The primary endpoint measured was rate of readmission and overstay.

RESULTS

A total of 72 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria for day-case surgery. Five patients (6.94%) required admission immediately following the procedure, ie, overstayed or were readmitted. The rates were 1.38% (P=.05, CI 95%) for readmission and 5.55% (P=.05, CI 95%) for overstay. Six (8.33%) patients were classified as ASA III, and 3 (50%) were readmitted or overstayed.

CONCLUSION

Day-case laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication is a feasible, safe option. The authors conclude that ASA score of III and increasing age correlate with an increasing incidence of overstay and readmission. Therefore, we would recommend the use of integrated pathways and advanced planning to reduce these rates.

Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: a review of present results and future prospects

Pancreatic surgery is still associated with a relatively high morbidity and mortality compared with other specialties. This is a result of the complex nature of the organ, the difficult access as a result of the retroperitoneal position and the number of technically challenging anastomoses required. Nevertheless, the past two decades have witnessed a steady improvement in morbidity and a decrease in mortality achieved through alterations of technique (particularly relating to the pancreatic anastomoses) together with hormonal manipulation to decrease pancreatic secretions. Recently minimally invasive pancreatic surgery has been attempted by several centres around the world which has stimulated considerable interest in this approach. The majority of the cases attempted have been distal pancreatectomies, because of the more straightforward nature of the resection and the lack of a pancreatic ductal anastomosis, but more recently reports of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy have started to appear. The reports of the series to date have been difficult to interpret and although the results are claimed to be equivalent or better than those associated with a traditional approach a careful examination of the literature and comparison with the best results previously reported does not presently support this. In the present review we examined all the reports of pancreatic procedures performed laparoscopically and compared the results with those previously achieved at open surgery.