1
|
Hua X, Chen Z, Zhang X, Chen Y, Wei Q, Lan J, Zhang D, Liu F, Wei H. Primary robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for hemorrhage secondary to angiomyolipoma: a retrospective study from a large tertiary hospital in China. Sci Rep 2024; 14:22458. [PMID: 39342001 PMCID: PMC11439052 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-73315-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2024] [Accepted: 09/16/2024] [Indexed: 10/01/2024] Open
Abstract
With the continuous development of robot-assisted technology, Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy (RALPN) has gradually become an optional method for the treatment of Hemorrhage secondary to angiomyolipoma (HSA). However, there are rare clinical reports of the primary RALPN for HSA. Therefore, this research aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of primary RALPN for HSA. Fourteen patients(six males and eight females), aged 14-56 years, underwent primary RALPN for HSA and were retrospectively analyzed from 2015 to 2023. The initial blood routine examination revealed decreased hemoglobin in all patients, and Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) indicated retroperitoneal hematoma. After correcting shock and electrolyte imbalance through fluid therapy and medical treatment, all primary RALPN procedures were performed with transabdominal access on the side of the Hemorrhage. After tumor resection and hematoma removal with a monopolar Curved Scissor, the absorbable barbed suture was performed for inner and outer running stitches, respectively. Patient demographic information, perioperative characteristics, and functional outcomes were collected and analyzed. The initial tumor size of fourteen patients ranged from 57 to 145 mm, and the RENAL ranged from 7 to 11. All of the HSA was controlled, and primary RALPN was successful. The operating time it was ranged from 105 to 265 min. Postoperatively, one patient exhibited chylous drainage (Clavien-Dindo II), and another patient developed pleural effusion (Clavien-Dindo III). No postoperative transfusion and Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA) highly selective embolization of the bleeding vessel was needed. No patients developed urinoma or urinary fistula. Within the follow-up period, the overall complications were manageable. Primary RALPN is a safe and effective procedure for HSA, which may be considered an alternative to selective renal artery embolization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xintao Hua
- The Second Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, 310053, Zhejiang, China
- Urology & Nephrology Center, Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, No. 158, Shangtang Road, Gongshu District, Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang, China
| | - Zeqi Chen
- Urology & Nephrology Center, Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, No. 158, Shangtang Road, Gongshu District, Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang, China
- Postgraduate Training Base Alliance of Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, 310014, China
| | - Xinyu Zhang
- Urology & Nephrology Center, Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, No. 158, Shangtang Road, Gongshu District, Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang, China
- Postgraduate Training Base Alliance of Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, 310014, China
| | - Yiyang Chen
- The Second Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, 310053, Zhejiang, China
- Urology & Nephrology Center, Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, No. 158, Shangtang Road, Gongshu District, Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang, China
| | - Qianqian Wei
- Urology & Nephrology Center, Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, No. 158, Shangtang Road, Gongshu District, Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jiawen Lan
- Urology & Nephrology Center, Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, No. 158, Shangtang Road, Gongshu District, Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang, China
| | - Dahong Zhang
- Urology & Nephrology Center, Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, No. 158, Shangtang Road, Gongshu District, Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang, China.
| | - Feng Liu
- Urology & Nephrology Center, Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, No. 158, Shangtang Road, Gongshu District, Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang, China.
| | - Haibin Wei
- Urology & Nephrology Center, Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, No. 158, Shangtang Road, Gongshu District, Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
García Rojo E, Hevia Palacios V, Brime Menendez R, Feltes Ochoa JA, Justo Quintas J, Lista Mateos F, Touijer K, Romero Otero J. Da Vinci and Hugo RAS Platforms for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a preliminary prospective comparative analysis of the outcomes. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2024; 76:303-311. [PMID: 38757775 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.24.05623-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) has emerged as the preferred approach for T1 renal-cell-carcinoma. As new robotic platforms like Hugo RAS emerge, we seek to understand their potential in achieving similar RAPN outcomes as the established Da Vinci system. METHODS A prospective single-center comparative study was conducted, and 50 patients selected for RAPN were enrolled (25 Da Vinci Xi; 25 Hugo RAS). The choice of robotic system was based solely on hospital logistics criteria. Surgeries were performed by expert surgeons. Demographic data, tumor characteristics, operative details and postoperative outcomes were collected. SPSS version 22.0 was used for statistical analyses. RESULTS The average age of patients was 62.52±9.47 years, with no significant differences in median age, sex, and nephrometry scores between groups. Da Vinci group showed a significantly shorter docking time (12.56 vs. 20.08 min; P<0.01), while other intraoperative measures like console time and warm ischemia time were similar. The Hugo RAS group had a shorter renorraphy time (14.33 vs. 18.84 min; P=0.024). Postoperative outcomes and surgical margin positivity showed no significant differences. Each group had one patient (4%) who developed major surgical complications (Clavien IIIa). Trifecta rates were comparable between both groups (Da Vinci 88% vs. Hugo RAS 84%; P=0.93). CONCLUSIONS Initial findings suggest similar perioperative outcomes for RAPN when using Hugo RAS compared to the Da Vinci system. Further research with long-term follow-up is necessary to evaluate oncological and functional outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther García Rojo
- Department of Urology, ROC Clinic, HM Sanchinarro University Hospital, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Vital Hevia Palacios
- Department of Urology, ROC Clinic, HM Sanchinarro University Hospital, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ricardo Brime Menendez
- Department of Urology, ROC Clinic, HM Sanchinarro University Hospital, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Javier A Feltes Ochoa
- Department of Urology, ROC Clinic, HM Sanchinarro University Hospital, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan Justo Quintas
- Department of Urology, ROC Clinic, HM Sanchinarro University Hospital, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Fernando Lista Mateos
- Department of Urology, ROC Clinic, HM Sanchinarro University Hospital, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Karim Touijer
- Service of Urology, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Javier Romero Otero
- Department of Urology, ROC Clinic, HM Sanchinarro University Hospital, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain -
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wei L, Wang C, Fu J, Qiangba T, Zhou X, He P, Li X, Lang L, Li C, Wang Y. Holographic 3D renal segments reconstruction protects renal function by promote choice of selective renal artery clamping during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. World J Urol 2023; 41:2975-2983. [PMID: 37698633 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04599-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/13/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the impact of selective artery clamping (SAC) and main artery clamping (MAC) during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) on renal function and the influence of holographic three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of renal segments on the selection between SAC and MAC. METHODS This retrospective observational study included patients who underwent RAPN at First Hospital Affiliated to the Army Medical University between December 2016 and July 2022. According to the clamping methods, the patients were divided into the SAC group and the MAC group. The primary outcome was renal function. RESULTS A total of 422 patients (194 in the SAC group and 228 in the MAC group) were included. The RAPN procedures were all completed successfully. The patients in SAC group had less glomerular filtration rate (GFR) decline in the affected kidney (8.6 ± 7.0 ml/min vs. 18.7 ± 10.9 ml/min, P < 0.001) and minor estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decrease (4.3 ± 10.5 ml/min vs. 12.6 ± 12.1 ml/min, P < 0.001) than those in MAC group. Among 37 patients with baseline renal insufficiency, the GFR decline of the affected kidney in the SAC subgroup was significantly lower than in the MAC subgroup (5.5 ± 6.5 ml/min vs. 14.3 ± 9.2 ml/min, P = 0.002). The proportion of patients who underwent 3D reconstruction was significant higher in the SAC group than in the MAC group. (65.46% vs. 28.07%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION The SAC technique during RAPN may serve as a protective measure for renal function, while the implementation of holographic 3D renal segment reconstruction technique may facilitate optimal selection of SAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ling Wei
- Department of Urology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, China
| | - Cong Wang
- Department of Urology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, China
| | - Jian Fu
- Department of Urology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, China
| | - Tudan Qiangba
- Department of Urology, Tibet CORPS Hospital of Chinese People's Armed Police Forces, Lhasa, 850000, Tibet, China
| | - Xiaozhou Zhou
- Department of Urology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, China
| | - Peng He
- Department of Urology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, China
| | - Xuemei Li
- Department of Urology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, China
| | - Lang Lang
- Department of Urology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, China
| | - Chunxia Li
- Department of Urology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, China
| | - Yongquan Wang
- Department of Urology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chaurasia A, Singh S, Homayounieh F, Gopal N, Jones EC, Linehan WM, Shyn PB, Ball MW, Malayeri AA. Complications after Nephron-sparing Interventions for Renal Tumors: Imaging Findings and Management. Radiographics 2023; 43:e220196. [PMID: 37384546 PMCID: PMC10323228 DOI: 10.1148/rg.220196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Revised: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023]
Abstract
The two primary nephron-sparing interventions for treating renal masses such as renal cell carcinoma are surgical partial nephrectomy (PN) and image-guided percutaneous thermal ablation. Nephron-sparing surgery, such as PN, has been the standard of care for treating many localized renal masses. Although uncommon, complications resulting from PN can range from asymptomatic and mild to symptomatic and life-threatening. These complications include vascular injuries such as hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula, and/or renal ischemia; injury to the collecting system causing urinary leak; infection; and tumor recurrence. The incidence of complications after any nephron-sparing surgery depends on many factors, such as the proximity of the tumor to blood vessels or the collecting system, the skill or experience of the surgeon, and patient-specific factors. More recently, image-guided percutaneous renal ablation has emerged as a safe and effective treatment option for small renal tumors, with comparable oncologic outcomes to those of PN and a low incidence of major complications. Radiologists must be familiar with the imaging findings encountered after these surgical and image-guided procedures, especially those indicative of complications. The authors review cross-sectional imaging characteristics of complications after PN and image-guided thermal ablation of kidney tumors and highlight the respective management strategies, ranging from clinical observation to interventions such as angioembolization or repeat surgery. Work of the U.S. Government published under an exclusive license with the RSNA. Online supplemental material and the slide presentation from the RSNA Annual Meeting are available for this article. Quiz questions for this article are available in the Online Learning Center. See the invited commentary by Chung and Raman in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aditi Chaurasia
- From the Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute,
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (A.C., N.G., W.M.L., M.W.B.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National
Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr 1C352, Bethesda, MD 20892 (S.S., F.H.,
E.C.J., A.A.M.); and Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Department
of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School,
Boston, Mass (P.B.S.)
| | - Shiva Singh
- From the Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute,
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (A.C., N.G., W.M.L., M.W.B.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National
Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr 1C352, Bethesda, MD 20892 (S.S., F.H.,
E.C.J., A.A.M.); and Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Department
of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School,
Boston, Mass (P.B.S.)
| | - Fatemeh Homayounieh
- From the Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute,
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (A.C., N.G., W.M.L., M.W.B.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National
Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr 1C352, Bethesda, MD 20892 (S.S., F.H.,
E.C.J., A.A.M.); and Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Department
of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School,
Boston, Mass (P.B.S.)
| | - Nikhil Gopal
- From the Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute,
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (A.C., N.G., W.M.L., M.W.B.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National
Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr 1C352, Bethesda, MD 20892 (S.S., F.H.,
E.C.J., A.A.M.); and Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Department
of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School,
Boston, Mass (P.B.S.)
| | - Elizabeth C. Jones
- From the Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute,
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (A.C., N.G., W.M.L., M.W.B.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National
Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr 1C352, Bethesda, MD 20892 (S.S., F.H.,
E.C.J., A.A.M.); and Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Department
of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School,
Boston, Mass (P.B.S.)
| | - W. Marston Linehan
- From the Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute,
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (A.C., N.G., W.M.L., M.W.B.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National
Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr 1C352, Bethesda, MD 20892 (S.S., F.H.,
E.C.J., A.A.M.); and Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Department
of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School,
Boston, Mass (P.B.S.)
| | - Paul B. Shyn
- From the Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute,
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (A.C., N.G., W.M.L., M.W.B.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National
Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr 1C352, Bethesda, MD 20892 (S.S., F.H.,
E.C.J., A.A.M.); and Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Department
of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School,
Boston, Mass (P.B.S.)
| | - Mark W. Ball
- From the Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute,
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (A.C., N.G., W.M.L., M.W.B.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National
Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr 1C352, Bethesda, MD 20892 (S.S., F.H.,
E.C.J., A.A.M.); and Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Department
of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School,
Boston, Mass (P.B.S.)
| | - Ashkan A. Malayeri
- From the Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute,
National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (A.C., N.G., W.M.L., M.W.B.);
Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National
Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr 1C352, Bethesda, MD 20892 (S.S., F.H.,
E.C.J., A.A.M.); and Division of Abdominal Imaging and Intervention, Department
of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School,
Boston, Mass (P.B.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
De Backer P, Vermijs S, Van Praet C, De Visschere P, Vandenbulcke S, Mottaran A, Bravi CA, Berquin C, Lambert E, Dautricourt S, Goedertier W, Mottrie A, Debbaut C, Decaestecker K. A Novel Three-dimensional Planning Tool for Selective Clamping During Partial Nephrectomy: Validation of a Perfusion Zone Algorithm. Eur Urol 2023; 83:413-421. [PMID: 36737298 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2022] [Revised: 11/25/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Selective clamping during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) requires extensive knowledge on patient-specific renal vasculature, obtained through imaging. OBJECTIVE To validate an in-house developed perfusion zone algorithm that provides patient-specific three-dimensional (3D) renal perfusion information. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Between October 2020 and June 2022, 25 patients undergoing RAPN at Ghent University Hospital were included. Three-dimensional models, based on preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans, showed the clamped artery's ischemic zone, as calculated by the algorithm. SURGICAL PROCEDURE All patients underwent selective clamping during RAPN. Indocyanine green (ICG) was administered to visualize the true ischemic zone perioperatively. Surgery was recorded for a postoperative analysis. MEASUREMENTS The true ischemic zone of the clamped artery was compared with the ischemic zone predicted by the algorithm through two metrics: (1) total ischemic zone overlap and (2) tumor ischemic zone overlap. Six urologists assessed metric 1; metric 2 was assessed objectively by the authors. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS In 92% of the cases, the algorithm was sufficiently accurate to plan a selective clamping strategy. Metric 1 showed an average score of 4.28 out of 5. Metric 2 showed an average score of 4.14 out of 5. A first limitation is that ICG can be evaluated only at the kidney surface. A second limitation is that mainly patients with impaired renal function are expected to benefit from this technology, but contrast-enhanced CT is required at present. CONCLUSIONS The proposed new tool demonstrated high accuracy when planning selective clamping for RAPN. A follow-up prospective study is needed to determine the tool's clinical added value. PATIENT SUMMARY In partial nephrectomy, the surgeon has no information on which specific arterial branches perfuse the kidney tumor. We developed a surgeon support system that visualizes the perfusion zones of all arteries on a three-dimensional model and indicates the correct arteries to clamp. In this study, we validate this tool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pieter De Backer
- Department of Urology, ERN eUROGEN Accredited Centre, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium; IBiTech-Biommeda, Department of Electronics and Information Systems, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent Belgium; ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium.
| | - Saar Vermijs
- IBiTech-Biommeda, Department of Electronics and Information Systems, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent Belgium; Cancer Research Institute Ghent, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Charles Van Praet
- Department of Urology, ERN eUROGEN Accredited Centre, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent Belgium
| | - Pieter De Visschere
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Sarah Vandenbulcke
- IBiTech-Biommeda, Department of Electronics and Information Systems, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Angelo Mottaran
- ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium; Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium
| | - Carlo A Bravi
- ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium; Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Camille Berquin
- Department of Urology, ERN eUROGEN Accredited Centre, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Edward Lambert
- Department of Urology, ERN eUROGEN Accredited Centre, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Stéphanie Dautricourt
- Department of Urology, ERN eUROGEN Accredited Centre, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Wouter Goedertier
- Department of Urology, ERN eUROGEN Accredited Centre, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Alexandre Mottrie
- ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium; Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium
| | - Charlotte Debbaut
- IBiTech-Biommeda, Department of Electronics and Information Systems, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Cancer Research Institute Ghent, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Karel Decaestecker
- Department of Urology, ERN eUROGEN Accredited Centre, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent Belgium; Department of Urology, AZ Maria Middelares Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tang H, Shen T, Zhou K, Xu F, Lv H, Ge J. Retrospective comparison of clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy through transabdominal or retroperitoneal approaches in patients with T1b renal tumor. BMC Urol 2022; 22:208. [PMID: 36544160 PMCID: PMC9769003 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-022-01162-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We compared the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RALPN) via transabdominal or retroperitoneal approaches in patients with stage T1b renal cell carcinoma. METHODS The medical records for 92 patients who underwent RALPN were retrospectively collected and data on their baseline demographics, duration of operation, duration of renal artery clamping, intraoperative blood loss, recovery time of intestinal functions, surgical margin positive rate, as well as postoperative complications were analyzed. RESULTS Of the 92 enrolled patients, 43 and 49 patients were subjected to RALPN via the transabdominal and retroperitoneal approaches, respectively. All patients successfully completed the operation. Baseline characteristics for the transabdominal and retroperitoneal groups were comparable. Differences in operative time, renal artery clamping time, intraoperative blood loss, positive rate of surgical margin, and incidences of postoperative complications between the two approaches were insignificant. The recovery time of intestinal function after operation was significantly shorter in patients subjected to the retroperitoneal approach, relative to those subjected to transabdominal approach (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Application of RALPN via transabdominal or retroperitoneal approaches showed comparable clinical outcomes in patients with stage T1b renal cell carcinoma. The retroperitoneal approach was superior to the transabdominal approach in terms of postoperative intestinal function recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Tang
- grid.41156.370000 0001 2314 964XDepartment of Urology, Jinling Hospital Affiliated to Medical College of Nanjing University, No. 305 East Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, 210002 China
| | - Tianyi Shen
- grid.41156.370000 0001 2314 964XDepartment of Urology, Jinling Hospital Affiliated to Medical College of Nanjing University, No. 305 East Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, 210002 China
| | - Kai Zhou
- grid.41156.370000 0001 2314 964XDepartment of Urology, Jinling Hospital Affiliated to Medical College of Nanjing University, No. 305 East Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, 210002 China
| | - Feng Xu
- grid.41156.370000 0001 2314 964XDepartment of Urology, Jinling Hospital Affiliated to Medical College of Nanjing University, No. 305 East Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, 210002 China
| | - Huichen Lv
- grid.41156.370000 0001 2314 964XDepartment of Urology, Jinling Hospital Affiliated to Medical College of Nanjing University, No. 305 East Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, 210002 China
| | - Jingping Ge
- grid.41156.370000 0001 2314 964XDepartment of Urology, Jinling Hospital Affiliated to Medical College of Nanjing University, No. 305 East Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, 210002 China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Murugesan A. Robot-assisted ipsilateral partial nephrectomy with distal ureterectomy for synchronous renal and ureteric tumors—a case report. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst 2022; 34:49. [DOI: 10.1186/s43046-022-00151-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Ipsilateral synchronous renal and ureteric tumor is uncommon. Nephron sparing surgery is the standard for small renal masses. Ureteric tumors can be selectively managed with nephron sparing surgery, especially in renal dysfunction. This case report details the management of double malignancy by nephron sparing surgery with robot-assisted approach.
Case report
A 63-year-old gentleman with diabetes presented with history of intermittent gross hematuria for 2 weeks. He was clinically normal. On evaluation, he had grade 4 renal dysfunction (Se. creatinine 4.5 mg%) with mild proteinuria. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed right renal upper polar Bosniak III lesion and right hydroureteronephrosis due to 2 cm ureteric tumor near the vessel crossing. Renogram showed overall GFR of 22 ml/min with 31% (6 ml/min) contribution from the right side. He underwent robot-assisted right partial nephrectomy with distal ureterectomy and Boari flap ureteric reimplantation. Histopathology revealed margins free T2 clear cell carcinoma (kidney) and high-grade T3 transitional cell carcinoma (ureter). His nadir creatinine at 1 year follow-up was 3.3 mg% and no recurrence on MRI, cystoscopy, and ureteroscopy at 1 year.
Conclusion
Minimally invasive nephron sparing surgery is feasible and reasonable option with satisfactory oncological control even in ipsilateral synchronous renal and ureteric tumors in selected patients with renal dysfunction.
Collapse
|
8
|
Hur KJ, Hooti Q, Shin D, Park YH, Bae WJ, Cho H, Ha US, Lee JY, Choi YJ, Hong SH. Implication of cystic fluid cytology of renal cell carcinoma on surgical practice. BMC Urol 2022; 22:192. [PMID: 36434618 PMCID: PMC9700985 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-022-01144-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the incidence of positive cystic fluid cytology and its risk factors in cystic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) addressing its implication on the current surgical practice. METHODS All clinically diagnosed Bosniak III, IV cystic renal masses from March 2019 to August 2022 were studied prospectively. Database of patients' demographics and cystic tumor characteristics were recorded. Partial or radical nephrectomies were performed by either laparoscopic or robotic approach. Cystic fluid was collected right after specimen retrieval in the surgical field and examined by pathologist. Cytology results were compared to the demographic, perioperative variables using univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS A total of 70 patients of histologically confirmed cystic RCC were included. Sixty seven patients underwent radical nephrectomy with laparoscopic or robotic approaches, while 3 patients underwent radical nephrectomy. There was no intraoperative cystic rupture or fluid spillage. Positive cystic fluid cytology findings were identified in 34 (48.6%) patients, while negative cystic fluid cytology were identified in 36 (51.4%) cases. Definite malignant cells were observed in 28 patients while the other six patients showed highly suspicious atypical cells. Histologically, 24 (70.8%) patients were proven clear cell RCC and 25 (73%) showed Fuhrman grade 1 or 2 in final histologic review in positive group. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis between positive and negative cytology groups showed that the presence of the malignant cells in cystic fluid was significantly associated with patients' age (> 55 years) and Bosniak grade of cystic tumor (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Definite malignant cells in cystic fluid cytology were observed through our study. Additionally, patients' age (> 55 years) and Bosniak grade were the significant risk factors of positive cytology in cystic RCC. Therefore, necessity of meticulous manipulation of cystic renal tumors, despite their clinical features, should not be underemphasized to avoid the least possible tumor cell seeding in case of cystic rupture when operating such high risk of positive cytology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyung Jae Hur
- grid.411947.e0000 0004 0470 4224Department of Urology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222, Banpo-Daero, Seocho-Gu, Seoul, 06591 Republic of Korea ,grid.413395.90000 0004 0647 1890Department of Urology, Daegu Fatima Hospital, Daegu, South Korea
| | - Qais Hooti
- grid.416132.30000 0004 1772 5665Department of Urology, The Royal Hospital, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman
| | - Dongho Shin
- grid.411947.e0000 0004 0470 4224Department of Urology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222, Banpo-Daero, Seocho-Gu, Seoul, 06591 Republic of Korea
| | - Yong Hyun Park
- grid.411947.e0000 0004 0470 4224Department of Urology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222, Banpo-Daero, Seocho-Gu, Seoul, 06591 Republic of Korea
| | - Woong Jin Bae
- grid.411947.e0000 0004 0470 4224Department of Urology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222, Banpo-Daero, Seocho-Gu, Seoul, 06591 Republic of Korea
| | - Hyukjin Cho
- grid.411947.e0000 0004 0470 4224Department of Urology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222, Banpo-Daero, Seocho-Gu, Seoul, 06591 Republic of Korea
| | - U-syn Ha
- grid.411947.e0000 0004 0470 4224Department of Urology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222, Banpo-Daero, Seocho-Gu, Seoul, 06591 Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Youl Lee
- grid.411947.e0000 0004 0470 4224Department of Urology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222, Banpo-Daero, Seocho-Gu, Seoul, 06591 Republic of Korea
| | - Yeong Jin Choi
- grid.411947.e0000 0004 0470 4224Department of Pathology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung-Hoo Hong
- grid.411947.e0000 0004 0470 4224Department of Urology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222, Banpo-Daero, Seocho-Gu, Seoul, 06591 Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bianchi L, Cercenelli L, Bortolani B, Piazza P, Droghetti M, Boschi S, Gaudiano C, Carpani G, Chessa F, Lodi S, Tartarini L, Bertaccini A, Golfieri R, Marcelli E, Schiavina R, Brunocilla E. 3D renal model for surgical planning of partial nephrectomy: A way to improve surgical outcomes. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1046505. [PMID: 36338693 PMCID: PMC9634646 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1046505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 09/13/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE to evaluate the impact of 3D model for a comprehensive assessment of surgical planning and quality of partial nephrectomy (PN). MATERIALS AND METHODS 195 patients with cT1-T2 renal mass scheduled for PN were enrolled in two groups: Study Group (n= 100), including patients referred to PN with revision of both 2D computed tomography (CT) imaging and 3D model; Control group (n= 95), including patients referred to PN with revision of 2D CT imaging. Overall, 20 individuals were switched to radical nephrectomy (RN). The primary outcome was the impact of 3D models-based surgical planning on Trifecta achievement (defined as the contemporary absence of positive surgical margin, major complications and ≤30% postoperative eGFR reduction). The secondary outcome was the impact of 3D models on surgical planning of PN. Multivariate logistic regressions were used to identify predictors of selective clamping and Trifecta's achievement in patients treated with PN (n=175). RESULTS Overall, 73 (80.2%) patients in Study group and 53 (63.1%) patients in Control group achieved the Trifecta (p=0.01). The preoperative plan of arterial clamping was recorded as clampless, main artery and selective in 22 (24.2%), 22 (24.2%) and 47 (51.6%) cases in Study group vs. 31 (36.9%), 46 (54.8%) and 7 (8.3%) cases in Control group, respectively (p<0.001). At multivariate logistic regressions, the use of 3D model was found to be independent predictor of both selective or super-selective clamping and Trifecta's achievement. CONCLUSION 3D-guided approach to PN increase the adoption of selective clamping and better predict the achievement of Trifecta.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Bianchi
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Università degli studi di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Laura Cercenelli
- eDIMES Lab - Laboratory of Bioengineering, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Barbara Bortolani
- eDIMES Lab - Laboratory of Bioengineering, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Pietro Piazza
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Matteo Droghetti
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Sara Boschi
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Caterina Gaudiano
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giulia Carpani
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesco Chessa
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Università degli studi di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Simone Lodi
- eDIMES Lab - Laboratory of Bioengineering, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Tartarini
- eDIMES Lab - Laboratory of Bioengineering, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessandro Bertaccini
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Università degli studi di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Rita Golfieri
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Emanuela Marcelli
- eDIMES Lab - Laboratory of Bioengineering, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Riccardo Schiavina
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Università degli studi di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Eugenio Brunocilla
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Università degli studi di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Vartolomei MD, Remzi M, Fajkovic H, Shariat SF. Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy Mid-Term Oncologic Outcomes: A Systematic Review. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11206165. [PMID: 36294486 PMCID: PMC9605111 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11206165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Revised: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 10/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is used more and more in present days as a therapy option for surgical treatment of cT1 renal masses. Current guidelines equally recommend open (OPN), laparoscopic (LPN), or robotic partial nephrectomy (PN). The aim of this review was to analyze the most representative RAPN series in terms of reported oncological outcomes. (2) Methods: A systematic search of Webofscience, PUBMED, Clinicaltrials.gov was performed on 1 August 2022. Studies were considered eligible if they: included patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) stage T1, were prospective, used randomized clinical trials (RCT) or retrospective studies, had patients undergo RAPN with a minimum follow-up of 48 months. (3) Results: Reported positive surgical margin rates were from 0 to 10.5%. Local recurrence occurred in up to 3.6% of patients. Distant metastases were reported in up to 6.4% of patients. 5-year cancer free survival (CFS) estimates rates ranged from 86.4% to 98.4%. 5-year cancer specific survival (CSS) estimates rates ranged from 90.1% to 100%, and 5-year overall survival (OS) estimates rated ranged from 82.6% to 97.9%. (4) Conclusions: Data coming from retrospective and prospective series shows very good oncologic outcomes after RAPN. Up to now, 10-year survival outcomes were not reported. Taken together, RAPN deliver similar oncologic performance to OPN and LPN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mihai Dorin Vartolomei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Institution Organizing University Doctoral Studies IOSUD, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences and Technology, 540142 Târgu Mureș, Romania
- Correspondence:
| | - Mesut Remzi
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Harun Fajkovic
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Shahrokh F. Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow 119992, Russia
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 14853, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 15006 Prague, Czech Republic
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al Ahlizza Amman University, Amman 19328, Jordan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Clinical and oncological outcomes of open partial nephrectomy versus robot assisted partial nephrectomy over 15 years. J Robot Surg 2022; 17:519-526. [PMID: 35851947 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-022-01446-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Partial nephrectomy (PN) is the gold standard surgical treatment for localized kidney cancer. The objective of our study was to compare clinical and perioperative outcomes of open partial nephrectomy (OPN) and robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). We retrospectively collected all patients who underwent PN for kidney cancer between 2007 and 2019 at two French academic urology departments. Clinical and perioperative outcomes and complications were compared between the OPN group and the RAPN group. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared using the log-rank test. We included 405 patients. The maximum follow-up time was 13.6 years in the OPN group and 7.1 years in the RAPN group. The OPN group was associated with more blood loss and longer hospital stay (respectively, 287 ml vs. 62.1 ml; p < 0.001 and 8.54 days vs. 4.96 days; p < 0.001). Ischemia time was shorter in the OPN group (11.4 min vs. 16.9 min; p < 0.001). The rate of complications during hospitalization and after discharge from hospital was higher in the OPN group (respectively, n = 51 vs. 30; p = 0.031 and n = 31 vs. 14; p < 0.001). RFS and OS were similar in both groups. In our study, RAPN has better perioperative outcomes with shorter hospital stay and less blood loss but also fewer early and late complications. However, we did not find any difference in terms of RFS and OS.
Collapse
|
12
|
Liedberg F, Abrahamsson J, Bobjer J, Gudjonsson S, Löfgren A, Nyberg M, Sörenby A. Robot-assisted nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma-feasibility and complications: a single center experience. Scand J Urol 2022; 56:301-307. [PMID: 35736556 DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2022.2091018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robot-assisted nephroureterectomy (RANU) is the primary treatment for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) at our hospital for patients with clinical stage less than T2, and for patients with invasive tumours, but unfit for major surgery. OBJECTIVE To assess peri-operative conditions and outcomes of RANU at our unit, and to evaluate the safety of the procedure. METHODS The medical records of all 166 patients undergoing RANU for suspected UTUC and followed for more than three months in a large university hospital in Sweden were reviewed retrospectively. After the exclusion of twenty patients because of previous cystectomy, simultaneous surgical procedure, or other tumour types than UTUC in the pathological report, 146 patients remained for the analyses. The primary endpoint was complication rate according to Clavien-Dindo at 90 days. Secondary endpoints were perioperative bleeding, violation of oncological surgical principles, hospital stay, and re-admission within 90 days. RESULTS The median age was 75 [(Inter Quartile Range) IQR 70-80] years and 57% of the patients had an ASA score above 2. According to Clavien-Dindo, one patient had a grade 3 complication, and no patient had a grade 4-5 complication. The median blood loss was 50 (IQR 20-100) ml and the median hospital stay was 6 (IQR 5-7) days. Twelve patients were re-admitted to the hospital within 90 days (eight with urinary tract infection/haematuria, one with hematoma, and three with other diseases). CONCLUSION Robot-assisted nephroureterectomy is a safe procedure for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma, with a low risk of major surgical complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Liedberg
- Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.,Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - J Abrahamsson
- Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.,Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - J Bobjer
- Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.,Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - S Gudjonsson
- Department of Urology, Landspitali University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - A Löfgren
- Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.,Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - M Nyberg
- Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.,Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - A Sörenby
- Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.,Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Jiang XL, OuYang K, Yang R, Yu XY, Yang DD, Wu JT, Zhao HW. The application of internal traction technique in retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for renal ventral tumors. World J Surg Oncol 2022; 20:213. [PMID: 35739505 PMCID: PMC9219164 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-022-02684-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background For patients with prior intra-abdominal surgery or multiple arteries, the retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (rRAPN) is a better choice. The renal ventral tumor poses an additional challenge due to poor tumor exposure. This study is determined to assess the feasibility of an internal traction technique (ITT) in rRAPN for the management of renal ventral tumors. Methods From November 2019 to March 2021, a total of 28 patients with renal ventral tumor underwent rRAPN. All patients had prior abdominal surgery or multiple arteries. The ITT group (20 patients), which improved the tumor exposure by traction of the kidney with suture, was compared with the traditional technique group (8 patients) in terms of warm ischemia time, estimated blood loss and postoperative hospital stay, retroperitoneal drainage, R.E.N.A.L. score, and serum creatinine. Differences were considered significant when P < 0.05. Results All rRAPN surgeries were successful without conversion to radical nephrectomy or open partial nephrectomy. The warm ischemia time was lower in the ITT group (17.10 min vs. 24.63 min; P < 0.05). Estimated blood loss in the traditional technique group was 324.88 ± 79.42 mL, and in the ITT group, it was 117.45±35.25 mL (P < 0.05). No significant differences with regard to postoperative hospital stay, retroperitoneal drainage, R.E.N.A.L. score, and serum creatinine were observed between both groups. Surgical margins were negative and no intraoperative complications occurred in all the patients. After 10 months of follow-up, no recurrence or metastasis occurred in all cases. Conclusion ITT is a feasible, safe, and valid procedure in rRAPN for renal ventral tumors. Application of ITT improved the exposure and reduces warm ischemic time in comparison with the conventional procedure. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-022-02684-1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao-Lu Jiang
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, Shandong, China
| | - Kui OuYang
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, Shandong, China
| | - Rui Yang
- Affiliated Hospital of Weifang Medical University, School of Clinical Medicine, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, China
| | - Xiao-Yang Yu
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, Shandong, China
| | - Dian-Dong Yang
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, Shandong, China
| | - Ji-Tao Wu
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, NO. 20 East Yuhuangding Road, Yantai, 264000, Shandong, China.
| | - Hong-Wei Zhao
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, NO. 20 East Yuhuangding Road, Yantai, 264000, Shandong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Yano F, Kira S, Takahashi N, Sawada N, Nakagomi H, Ihara T, Takeda M, Mitsui T. Risk Factors for Atelectasis or Pneumomediastinum After Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy. Cureus 2021; 13:e20383. [PMID: 35036214 PMCID: PMC8752410 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.20383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
|
15
|
Haehn DA, Bajalia EM, Gonzalez Albo GA, Thomas Ball CS, Thiel DD. Statin use and association with postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rates in patients undergoing robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy. J Endourol 2021; 36:197-202. [PMID: 34663077 DOI: 10.1089/end.2020.1199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the association between preoperative statin use with changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) following robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). METHODS 389 consecutive patients undergoing RAPN were evaluated. Associations of preoperative statin use with change in eGFR from pre-RAPN to POD1, 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months after RAPN were evaluated using longitudinal mixed-effects regression models with random patient-specific intercepts and slopes while accounting for imbalance of preoperative patient and tumor characteristics between groups with stabilized inverse propensity score weighting. Post-operative eGFR change from baseline was measured as total change, maintaining eGFR within 10% of baseline, and as going from eGFR > 60 ml/min/1.73m2 to < 60 ml/min/1.73m2. RESULTS 167 (43.0%) of 389 patients were on statin therapy preoperatively. Statin patients were older (66 vs. 58 years old) and had higher rates of comorbidities including diabetes mellitus (31.7% vs. 14.9%) and hypertension (82.6% vs. 45%). Statin patients tended to have lower preoperative eGFR (mean±SD, 71.1±17.6 vs. 77.4±19.4 ml/min/1.73m2). There was no evidence of an association of preoperative statin use with changes in eGFR at any time point following RAPN (P=0.66). CONCLUSION Patients on pre-operative statins undergoing RAPN had lower eGFR preoperatively compared to those not taking those medications. There was no evidence of an association between preoperative statin use and change in post-RAPN eGFR in the immediate post-operative period or at 1 year following surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela A Haehn
- Mayo Clinic Florida, 23389, Urology, 4500 San Pablo Rd S, Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32224;
| | - Essa M Bajalia
- Mayo Clinic Florida, 23389, Urology, Jacksonville, Florida, United States;
| | | | | | - David D Thiel
- Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, Department of Urology, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32224.,University of Iowa, Department of Urology, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, Iowa, United States, 52242;
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Carbonara U, Simone G, Minervini A, Sundaram CP, Larcher A, Lee J, Checcucci E, Fiori C, Patel D, Meagher M, Crocerossa F, Veccia A, Hampton LJ, Ditonno P, Battaglia M, Brassetti A, Bove A, Mari A, Campi R, Carini M, Sulek J, Montorsi F, Capitanio U, Eun D, Porpiglia F, Derweesh I, Autorino R. Outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors: A multicenter analysis. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2021; 47:1179-1186. [PMID: 32868149 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2020] [Revised: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 08/10/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Multicenter retrospective analysis of robotic partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors (i.e. 3 points for the 'E' domain of the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score) was performed. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients' demographics, tumor characteristics, perioperative, functional, pathological and oncological data were analyzed and compared with those of patients with exophytic and mesophytic masses (i.e. 1 and 2 points for the 'E' domain, respectively). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess variables for trifecta achievement (negative margin, no postoperative complications, and 90% estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] recovery). RESULTS Overall, 147 patients were included in the study group. Patients with a completely endophytic mass had bigger tumors (mean 4.2 vs. 4.1 vs. 3.2 cm; p < 0.001) on preoperative imaging and higher overall R.E.N.A.L. score. There was no difference in mean operative time. Estimated blood loss was higher in the endophytic group (mean 177.75 vs. 185.5 vs. 130 ml; p = 0.001). Warm ischemia time was shorter for the exophytic group (median 16 vs. 21 vs. 22 min; p < 0.001). Postoperative complications were more frequent in patients with endophytic tumor (24.8% vs. 19.5% vs. 14.8%; p < 0.001). Six (4.5%) patients had positive surgical margins, there was no difference between groups. Trifecta was achieved in 44 patients in endophytic group (45.4 vs. 68.8 and 50.9%, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis for trifecta revealed that clinical tumor size (odds ratio: 0.667, 95% confidence interval: 0.56-0.79, p < 0.001) was only significant predictor for trifecta achievement. CONCLUSIONS Our findings confirm that RAPN in case of completely endophytic renal masses can be performed with acceptable outcomes in centers with significant robotic expertise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Umberto Carbonara
- Division of Urology, VCU Health, Richmond, VA, USA; Department of Urology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | | | - Andrea Minervini
- Department of Urology, Carreggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Alessandro Larcher
- Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Jennifer Lee
- Department of Urology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Enrico Checcucci
- Department of Urology, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Cristian Fiori
- Department of Urology, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Devin Patel
- Department of Urology, UCSD, San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Aldo Brassetti
- Department of Urology, Regina Elena Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Alfredo Bove
- Department of Urology, Regina Elena Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Mari
- Department of Urology, Carreggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Riccardo Campi
- Department of Urology, Carreggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Marco Carini
- Department of Urology, Carreggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Jay Sulek
- Department of Urology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Umberto Capitanio
- Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniel Eun
- Department of Urology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Department of Urology, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Usefulness of Thulium-Doped Fiber Laser and Diode Laser in Zero Ischemia Kidney Surgery-Comparative Study in Pig Model. MATERIALS 2021; 14:ma14082000. [PMID: 33923581 PMCID: PMC8073520 DOI: 10.3390/ma14082000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2021] [Revised: 03/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of a thulium-doped fiber laser and a diode laser in zero ischemia kidney surgery, by carrying out a comparative study in a pig model. Material and methods: Research was carried out on 12 pigs weighing 30 kg each. A thulium-doped fiber laser (TDFL) and a diode laser (DL) operating at wavelengths of 1940 and 1470 nm, respectively, were used. The cut sites were assessed both macroscopically and microscopically. The zone of thermal damage visible in the histopathological preparations was divided into superficial and total areas. Results: During partial nephrectomy, moderate to minimal bleeding was observed, which did not require additional hemostatic measures. All animals survived the procedure. On day 0, the total thermal damage depth was 837.8 µm for the TDFL and 1175.0 µm for the DL. On day 7, the depths were 1556.2 and 2301.7 µm, respectively. On day 14, the overall thermal damage depth for the DL was the greatest (6800 µm). The width of the superficial zone was significantly reduced on days 7 and 14 after TDFL application. Conclusion: Both lasers are suitable for partial wedge nephrectomy without ischemia in pigs. The TDFL produced similar or better hemostasis than the DL, with a smaller zone of thermal damage and, therefore, seems more suitable for application in human medicine.
Collapse
|
18
|
Xu Z, Xu C, Zheng J, Zheng Y. Harmonic scalpel versus traditional scissors in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: A propensity score-based analysis. LAPAROSCOPIC, ENDOSCOPIC AND ROBOTIC SURGERY 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.lers.2021.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
|
19
|
The Impact of 3D Digital Reconstruction on the Surgical Planning of Partial Nephrectomy: A Case-control Study. Still Time for a Novel Surgical Trend? Clin Genitourin Cancer 2020; 18:e669-e678. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2020.03.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2020] [Revised: 03/29/2020] [Accepted: 03/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
20
|
Numakura K, Muto Y, Yamamoto R, Koizumi A, Nara T, Kanda S, Saito M, Narita S, Inoue T, Habuchi T. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma in horseshoe kidney: a hybrid technique with conventional laparoscopic surgery. Int Cancer Conf J 2020; 9:199-202. [PMID: 32904068 DOI: 10.1007/s13691-020-00420-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2020] [Accepted: 05/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomies (RAPN) have come up to standard treatment for small renal tumors, with a growing indication to accomplish this procedure. Although a horseshoe kidney is one of the most common congenital renal fusion anomalies, surgical planning for tumors is considered difficult because of its poor mobility and abnormal vascular supply. We showed our experience of RAPN in combination with conventional laparoscopic kidney mobilization and dissection for a patient with renal cell carcinoma in a horseshoe kidney. The patient was an otherwise healthy 66-year-old man with 26 mm right renal mass on the lower pole of the horseshoe kidney. Robotic assistance allows for proper tissue dissection, easy to aware unconfirmed vasculatures, and meticulous fine suturing and would overcome the potential challenges involved in the minimally invasive management of such complex anomalies as shown in the patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuyuki Numakura
- Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543 Japan
| | - Yumina Muto
- Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543 Japan
| | - Ryohei Yamamoto
- Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543 Japan
| | - Atsushi Koizumi
- Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543 Japan
| | - Taketoshi Nara
- Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543 Japan
| | - Sohei Kanda
- Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543 Japan
| | - Mitsuru Saito
- Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543 Japan
| | - Shintaro Narita
- Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543 Japan
| | - Takamitsu Inoue
- Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543 Japan
| | - Tomonori Habuchi
- Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543 Japan
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Guo J, Zhou X, Zhang C, Wang G, Fu B. Comparison Studies of “Ultrathin Parenchyma” Resection and Sharp Dissection in Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Tumors. J Endourol 2020; 34:281-288. [PMID: 31885280 DOI: 10.1089/end.2019.0698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ju Guo
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, P.R. China
| | - Xiaochen Zhou
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, P.R. China
| | - Cheng Zhang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, P.R. China
| | - Gongxian Wang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, P.R. China
| | - Bin Fu
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Koo CH, Ryu JH. Anesthetic considerations for urologic surgeries. Korean J Anesthesiol 2019; 73:92-102. [PMID: 31842248 PMCID: PMC7113163 DOI: 10.4097/kja.19437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2019] [Accepted: 12/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Urologic surgeries are widely performed, and the cases have increased owing to the fact that the elderly population is growing. The narrow and limited surgical space is a challenge in performing most urologic surgeries. Additionally, the elderly population is exposed to the risk of perioperative complications; therefore, a comprehensive understanding and approach are required to provide optimized anesthesia during surgery. We have searched the literature on anesthesia for urologic surgeries and summarized the anesthetic considerations for urologic surgeries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chang-Hoon Koo
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Jung-Hee Ryu
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.,Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abaza R, Gerhard RS, Martinez O. Feasibility of adopting retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy after extensive transperitoneal experience. World J Urol 2019; 38:1087-1092. [DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02935-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2019] [Accepted: 08/28/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
|
24
|
Cronan J, Dariushnia S, Bercu Z, Ermentrout RM, Majdalany B, Findeiss L, Newsome J, Kokabi N. Systematic Review of Contemporary Evidence for the Management of T1 Renal Cell Carcinoma: What IRs Need to Know for Kidney Cancer Tumor Boards. Semin Intervent Radiol 2019; 36:194-202. [PMID: 31435127 DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1693119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Renal cell carcinoma is a relatively common malignancy, with 60 to 70 thousand cases a year in the United States alone. Increased utilization of cross-sectional imaging has led to an increase in the number of early renal cell cancers seen by the medical establishment. In addition, certain patient populations have an increased risk of developing kidney cancers which may mandate aggressive screening protocols. This article discusses the epidemiology of renal cell cancers; discusses the current management guidelines from multiple specialty societies; discusses some of the surgical and interventional techniques used in the treatment of such lesions; and provides a review of the literature regarding treatments of early-stage renal cell cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Cronan
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Sean Dariushnia
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Zachary Bercu
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Robert Mitchell Ermentrout
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Bill Majdalany
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Laura Findeiss
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Janice Newsome
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Nima Kokabi
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Sayari AJ, Pardo C, Basques BA, Colman MW. Review of robotic-assisted surgery: what the future looks like through a spine oncology lens. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2019; 7:224. [PMID: 31297389 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2019.04.69] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Recent advancements in medical technology have led to the emergence of robotic-assisted surgery with the hope of creating a safer and more efficient surgical environment for the patient and surgical team. Spine surgery and spine tumor surgery involve challenging anatomy and demand highly precise surgical maneuvers, creating an important niche for robotic systems. While still in its infancy, robotics in spine surgery have proven successful in pedicle screw placement. Similarly, robotics has begun to be used for accurate resections and surgical planning in tumor surgery. As future studies are published and robotics systems continue to evolve, we can expect more tactile haptic feedback and implementation of useful instruments to improve preoperative planning, resection guidance, and reconstruction during spine tumor surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arash J Sayari
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Coralie Pardo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Bryce A Basques
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Matthew W Colman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Benoit M, Bouvier A, Panayotopoulos P, Culty T, Guillonneau B, Aube C, Azzouzi AR, Sebe P, Bigot P. Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy After Selective Embolization and Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: A Comparison of Short-Term Oncological and Functional Outcomes. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2018; 16:453-457. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2018] [Revised: 07/04/2018] [Accepted: 07/07/2018] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
|
27
|
Heinze A, Larcher A, Umari P, Fossati N, Piccolo J, De Groote R, Goossens M, De Coninck V, De Naeyer G, Mottrie A. Assessing perioperative, functional and oncological outcomes of patients with imperative versus elective indications for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: Results from a high-volume center. Int J Urol 2018; 25:826-831. [PMID: 30132976 DOI: 10.1111/iju.13754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2018] [Accepted: 06/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the impact of imperative or elective indications on the perioperative, functional and oncological outcomes of patients undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. METHODS Between June 2006 and September 2016, data of patients who underwent robot-assisted partial nephrectomy at the Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital in Aalst, Belgium, were retrospectively reviewed from a prospectively collected database. Only patients with non-metastatic, clinical T1-T2 graded tumors were included. Perioperative, functional and oncological outcomes were recollected. A comparative analysis was carried out after dividing patients into two groups: those who underwent robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for an elective indication (group 1, n = 194), and for an imperative indication (group 2, n = 57) caused by a solitary kidney (n = 20), impaired renal function (n = 2) or both (n = 35). RESULTS Patients in group 2 were older (74 vs 71 years, P < 0.001), and had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (P < 0.001) and American Society of Anesthesiologists score (P < 0.001). No differences were observed concerning laterality, sex, preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical score or clinical stage. Surgical outcomes considering estimated blood loss, surgical time, ischemia time and transfusion rate showed no significant difference between groups. The complication rate according to Clavien-Dindo showed no difference between groups (P = 0.6). No difference was found between groups with regard to percentage decrease of estimated glomerular filtration rate (7.4 vs 4.8%, P < 0.15). CONCLUSIONS Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy can be safely and effectively carried out by experienced surgeons in a high-volume center with similar perioperative, functional and oncological outcomes for both elective or imperative indications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Heinze
- Department of Urology, OLV Ziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium.,School of Medicine, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Alessandro Larcher
- Department of Urology, OLV Ziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium.,Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Umari
- Department of Urology, OLV Ziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium.,Department of Urology, Ospedali riuniti di Trieste, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Nicola Fossati
- Department of Urology, OLV Ziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium.,Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Joey Piccolo
- American British Cowdray Medical Center, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Khene ZE, Peyronnet B, Pradère B, Robert C, Goujon A, Kammerer-Jacquet SF, Verhoest G, Rioux-Leclercq N, Mathieu R, Bensalah K. Does tumour effraction during robotic partial nephrectomy have any impact on recurrence? Int J Clin Oncol 2018; 24:87-93. [PMID: 30083964 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-018-1331-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2018] [Accepted: 08/02/2018] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the impact of accidental surgical incision into the tumour (ASIT) on oncological outcomes in patients undergoing RPN for a malignant tumour. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective review of our prospectively maintained database was performed to identify all patients who underwent RPN for a localized RCC between June 2010 and July 2016. We stratified our cohort into two groups according to the presence of an ASIT. Perioperative data were compared between the two groups. Logistic regression analyses were used to assess the variables associated with ASIT. Recurrence-free survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between groups with the log-rank test. RESULTS A total of 234 patients were identified. 32 (14%) ASIT were observed. Patients' characteristics were similar in the two groups. Most of intraoperative outcomes were comparable between the two groups, but patients in the ASIT group had greater EBL (475 vs. 300 mL; p = 0.01). In multivariate analysis, tumour size (p = 0.02), RENAL score (p = 0.02), EBL (p = 0.05) and low surgeon experience (p = 0.03) were all predictive factors of ASIT. 15 (6%) of recurrences were observed over a median follow-up of 36 months. There was no difference in recurrence-free survival between the two groups (p = 0.57). CONCLUSIONS In our experience, accidental surgical incision into the tumour during RPN was a common event that did not appear to compromise oncological outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zine-Eddine Khene
- Department of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, 2, Rue Henri Le Guilloux, 35033, Rennes Cedex, France.
| | - Benoit Peyronnet
- Department of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, 2, Rue Henri Le Guilloux, 35033, Rennes Cedex, France
| | - Benjamin Pradère
- Department of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, 2, Rue Henri Le Guilloux, 35033, Rennes Cedex, France
| | - Corentin Robert
- Department of Radiology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France
| | - Anna Goujon
- Department of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, 2, Rue Henri Le Guilloux, 35033, Rennes Cedex, France
| | | | - Grégory Verhoest
- Department of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, 2, Rue Henri Le Guilloux, 35033, Rennes Cedex, France
| | | | - Romain Mathieu
- Department of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, 2, Rue Henri Le Guilloux, 35033, Rennes Cedex, France
| | - Karim Bensalah
- Department of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, 2, Rue Henri Le Guilloux, 35033, Rennes Cedex, France
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
The age of robotic surgery - Is laparoscopy dead? Arab J Urol 2018; 16:262-269. [PMID: 30140462 PMCID: PMC6104663 DOI: 10.1016/j.aju.2018.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2018] [Revised: 06/24/2018] [Accepted: 07/10/2018] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) has become a widely used technology in urology. Urological procedures that are now being routinely performed robotically are: radical prostatectomy (RP), radical cystectomy (RC), renal procedures - mainly partial nephrectomy (PN), and pyeloplasty, as well as ureteric re-implantation and adrenalectomy. Methods This non-systematic review of the literature examines the effectiveness of RALS compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery for the most relevant urological procedures. Results For robot-assisted RP there seems to be an advantage in terms of continence and potency over laparoscopy. Robot-assisted RC seems equal in terms of oncological outcome but with lower complication rates; however, the effect of intracorporeal urinary diversion has hardly been examined. Robotic PN has proven safe and is most likely superior to conventional laparoscopy, whereas there does not seem to be a real advantage for the robot in radical nephrectomy. For reconstructive procedures, e.g. pyeloplasty and ureteric re-implantation, there seems to be advantages in terms of operating time. Conclusions We found substantial, albeit mostly low-quality evidence, that robotic operations can have better outcomes than procedures performed laparoscopically. However, in light of the significant costs and because high-quality data from prospective randomised trials are still missing, conventional urological laparoscopy is certainly not 'dead' yet.
Collapse
Key Words
- (RA)PN, (robot-assisted) partial nephrectomy
- (RA)RN, (robot-assisted) radical nephrectomy
- (RA)RP, (robot-assisted) radical prostatectomy
- (RA-)RPLND, (robot-assisted) retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy (RA)RC, (robot-assisted) radical cystectomy
- 3D, three-dimensional
- EAU, European Association of Urology
- ICG, indocyanine green
- IVC, inferior vena cava
- Laparoscopic
- NSGCT, non-seminomatous germ cell tumour
- PSM, positive surgical margin
- RAIL, robot-assisted inguinal lymphadenectomy
- RALS, robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery
- RALUR, robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteric re-implantation
- Robotic
- Robotic urological surgery
- Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
- WIT, warm ischaemia time
- dVSS, da Vinci Surgical System
Collapse
|
30
|
Pradere B, Peyronnet B, Delporte G, Manach Q, Khene ZE, Moulin M, Roumiguié M, Rizk J, Brichart N, Beauval JB, Cormier L, Bex A, Rouprêt M, Bruyère F, Bensalah K. Intraoperative Cyst Rupture during Partial Nephrectomy for Cystic Renal Masses-Does it Increase the Risk of Recurrence? J Urol 2018; 200:1200-1206. [PMID: 29935273 DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.06.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/12/2018] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Our objective was to assess the prevalence of intraoperative cyst rupture and its impact on oncologic outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS All patients who underwent partial nephrectomy for a cystic renal mass via an open or robot-assisted approach at a total of 8 academic institutions were included in this retrospective study. All operative reports were carefully reviewed and any description of cyst rupture, cyst effraction or local spillage intraoperatively was recorded as cyst rupture. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was done to assess the variables associated with cyst rupture. Recurrence-free, cancer specific and overall survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log rank test. RESULTS Overall 268 patients were included in study. There were 50 intraoperative cyst ruptures (18.7%) in the whole cohort. No preoperative parameter was significantly associated with a risk of intraoperative cyst rupture on univariate or multivariate analysis. Of the cystic renal masses 75% were malignant on the final pathology report. At a median followup of 32 months 5 patients (2.5%) had local recurrence while progression to metastasis was observed in 2%. There were no peritoneal carcinomatosis nor port site metastasis. There was also no local or metastatic recurrence in the subgroup with intraoperative cyst rupture. Estimated recurrence-free survival did not differ significantly between patients with vs without intraoperative cyst rupture at 100% vs 92.7% at 5 years (p = 0.20). CONCLUSIONS Intraoperative cyst rupture during partial nephrectomy is a relatively common occurrence but with few oncologic implications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Tours, Tours, France.
| | - Benoit Peyronnet
- Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - Gauthier Delporte
- Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire Lille, Lille, France
| | - Quentin Manach
- Department of Urology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpetrière, Sorbonne Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Zine-Eddine Khene
- Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - Morgan Moulin
- Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon, Dijon, France
| | - Mathieu Roumiguié
- Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Jérome Rizk
- Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire Lille, Lille, France
| | - Nicolas Brichart
- Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Orléans, Orléans, France
| | | | - Luc Cormier
- Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon, Dijon, France
| | - Axel Bex
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Department of Urology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpetrière, Sorbonne Université, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Franck Bruyère
- Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Tours, Tours, France
| | - Karim Bensalah
- Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Rennes, Rennes, France
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
With the ubiquitous use of cross-sectional abdominal imaging in recent years, the incidence of small renal masses (SRMs) has increased, and the evaluation and management of SRMs have become important clinical issues. Diagnosing a mass in the early stages theoretically allows for high rates of cure but simultaneously risks overtreatment. In the past 20 years, surgical treatment of SRMs has transitioned from radical nephrectomy for all renal tumors, regardless of size, to elective partial nephrectomy whenever technically feasible. Additionally, newer approaches, including renal mass biopsy, active surveillance for select patients, and renal mass ablation, have been increasingly used. In this chapter, we review the current evidence-based papers covering aspects of the diagnosis and management of SRMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Avinash Chenam
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology and Urologic Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, 1500 E. Duarte Rd, MOB L002H, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA
| | - Clayton Lau
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology and Urologic Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, 1500 E. Duarte Rd, MOB L002H, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Honda M, Morizane S, Hikita K, Takenaka A. Current status of robotic surgery in urology. Asian J Endosc Surg 2017; 10:372-381. [PMID: 28905493 DOI: 10.1111/ases.12381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2017] [Accepted: 03/08/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
As a result of ergonomics, optimal magnification of the operative field, surgeon dexterity, and precision of surgical manipulation, robotic technology has been shown to overcome many difficulties associated with pure laparoscopy. With the recent expansion of robot-assisted surgery in the field of urology and following the success of robot-assisted prostatectomy and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy, robot-assisted surgery is being applied to treat many other genitourinary diseases, such as bladder cancer and ureteropelvic junction obstruction. The aim of the present review is to discuss the role of robotic surgery in urology and summarize recent developments in the field of urologic robotic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masashi Honda
- Department of Urology, Tottori University Faculty of Medicine, Yonago, Japan
| | - Shuichi Morizane
- Department of Urology, Tottori University Faculty of Medicine, Yonago, Japan
| | - Katsuya Hikita
- Department of Urology, Tottori University Faculty of Medicine, Yonago, Japan
| | - Atsushi Takenaka
- Department of Urology, Tottori University Faculty of Medicine, Yonago, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Kasivisvanathan V, Raison N, Challacombe B. The diagnosis and management of small renal masses. Int J Surg 2016; 36:493-494. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.11.096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|