Building a model for day case hiatal surgery - Lessons learnt over a 10 year period in a high volume unit: A case series

Feasibility and Outcomes of Same-Day Surgery in Primary and Reoperative Laparoscopic Hiatal Hernia Repair

OBJECTIVE

To assess the feasibility and outcomes of same-day surgery in primary and reoperative laparoscopic hiatal hernia repairs.

METHODS

Same-day surgery was planned in elective procedures with ASA II-IV. An Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol was implemented to achieve same-day surgery, and opioid-based anesthesia was replaced by opioid-free anesthesia. Outcomes were assessed by length of stay, transition from same-day surgery to observation or inpatient, and postoperative emergency department visits/readmissions. The predictors of same-day surgery were assessed. Values are presented as median (interquartile range).

RESULTS

From 04/13/2017 to 09/29/2022, there were 518 laparoscopic hiatal hernia repairs in 491 patients, 428/518 (82.6%) were primary, and 90/518 (17.4%) were reoperative. In the primary group, 314/428 (73.4%) were planned as same-day surgery and 246/314 (78.3%) were performed as same-day surgery. Same-day surgery with opioid-based anesthesia protocol was performed in 77/314 (24.5%) vs. same-day surgery with opioid-free anesthesia protocol in 169/314 (53.8%), p < 0.001, 41/246 (16.7%) same-day surgery primary procedures had emergency department visit post-discharge, and 26/246 (10.6%) were readmitted. In the reoperative group, 51/90 (56.7%) were planned as same-day surgery, and 27/51 (52.9%) were performed as same-day surgery. Same-day surgery with opioid-based anesthesia protocol was performed in 2/51 (3.9%) vs. same-day surgery with opioid-free anesthesia protocol in 25/51 (49.0%), p < 0.001, 3/27 (11.1%) same-day surgery reoperative procedures had emergency department visit post-discharge, and 3/27 (11.1%) were readmitted. Opioid-free anesthesia protocol was the positive predictor of same-day surgery compared to opioid-based anesthesia protocol (OR 7.44 [95% CI: 2.94, 18.83]), p < 0.001. Negative predictors were ASA III compared to II (OR 0.52 [95% CI: 0.28, 0.94]), p = 0.031, and duration of operation (OR 0.98 [0.97, 0.99]) p < 0.001.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair can be performed as same-day surgery in the majority of primary and reoperative procedures with good outcomes and low postoperative emergency department visits and readmissions. The odds of same-day surgery are higher with opioid-free anesthesia, lower ASA, and shorter operative time.

A fast tract to foregut surgery: Pandemic-driven protocol development

BACKGROUND

COVID-19 has overwhelmed many health care systems which has affected the landscape of elective surgery. A pandemic driven protocol was developed to perform foregut surgeries as a Same Day Surgery (SDS) discharge for all comers to reduce resource utilization.

METHODS

Retrospective review of all patients who underwent elective laparoscopic foregut surgery (hiatal hernia, paraesophageal hernia, heller myotomy, and fundoplication) from 8/1/2020-1/31/2022 by a single surgeon after the implementation of a SDS protocol. Patients were compared to a pre-pandemic cohort, from 8/1/2019-4/30/2020, when overnight admission was standard practice.

RESULTS

There were 36 pre-pandemic patients, and 41 pandemic patients successfully discharged the same day of surgery. We failed to detect a statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding 30-day ED visit rate (p-value of 0.4557) and 30-day readmission rate (p-value of 0.6790).

CONCLUSION

The creation of a SDS protocol for foregut surgery is a safe way to deliver much needed care to the community while decreasing resource utilization.

Robotic Hiatal Hernia Repair Associated with Higher Morbidity and Readmission Rates Compared to Laparoscopic Repair: 10-Year Analysis from the National Readmissions Database (NRD)

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic techniques have been used for hiatal hernia repair. Robotic-assisted repairs have been increasingly used with unproven benefits. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes between laparoscopic and robotic-assisted hiatal hernia repair.

METHODS

The Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) was used to identify hospitalizations for laparoscopic or robotic hiatal hernia repair from 2010 to 2019. Primary outcomes included post-operative complications and 30- and 90-day readmission rates. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital death, length of stay, and inflation-adjusted hospital cost. Multivariable models were estimated for overall complication and readmission rates.

RESULTS

Approximately 517,864 hospitalizations met inclusion criteria with 11.3% including robotic repairs. Robotic repair was associated with a higher overall complication rate (9.2% vs. 6.8%, odds ratio [OR]: 1.4, 95% CI: 1.3-1.5, p < .001); however, the trend showed more similar complication rates across years. The higher overall complication rate remained after adjusting for patient and facility characteristics (adjusted OR [aOR]: 1.3, 95% CI: 1.2-1.4, p < .001). Robotic repairs were associated with higher 30-day (6.1% vs. 7.4%, aOR: 1.2, 95% CI: 1.2-1.3, p < .001) and 90-day readmission rates (9.4% vs. 11.2%, aOR: 1.2, 95% CI: 1.2-1.3, p < .001). In-hospital mortality and length of stay were similar, although, higher hospital costs were associated with robotic repairs. Both complications and readmission rates were lower as annual procedural volume increased.

CONCLUSION

Robotic repairs had higher unadjusted and adjusted complication and readmission rates. The overall complication rate has shown a trend towards improvement which may be a result of increasing experience with robotic surgery.

Technique and outcome of day case laparoscopic hiatus hernia surgery for small and large hernias: a five-year retrospective review from a high-volume UK centre

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery is the standard surgical treatment for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in patients for who long-term pharmacotherapy is intolerable or ineffective. Advances in anaesthesia and minimally invasive surgery have led to day case treatment being adopted by some centres. The objective of this study is to describe our day case pathway and peri- and postoperative outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a single centre, retrospective case series review of a prospectively collected database from October 2014 to August 2019 performed in a tertiary centre for upper gastrointestinal surgery. Data collected included demographics, comorbidities, indications, complications, length of stay and readmission.

RESULTS

A total of 362 patients underwent laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery with or without hiatus hernia repair of up to 10cm, with day case rates of 59%. Unplanned admission following day surgery was 5.1% (13/225) and 30-day readmission was 2.2% (8/362); 90.6% of patients remained in hospital for less than 24 hours. There was one intraoperative complication and one patient required revisional surgery within 30 days. The rate of all postoperative complications was 1.38% (5/362) with one postoperative mortality.

DISCUSSION

The inclusion of larger hernias is unusual, as most studies limit size to 5cm or less. Our results show the safety and feasibility of the procedure even when applied to hiatus hernias up to 10cm. Success was multifactorial and based on standardisation of procedures and support from dedicated specialist nursing staff.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery can be performed safely as a day case procedure even in larger hiatus hernias, with a dedicated care pathway and specialist nurse practitioners to support it.