Are we curing by cutting? A call for long-term follow up and outcomes research in global surgery interventions - perspective

Global trends and decision-making in the management of arachnoid cysts

OBJECTIVE

In pediatric patients, middle cranial fossa (MCF) arachnoid cysts are often discovered incidentally on imaging in asymptomatic patients during workup for other indications. This study aims to describe current management gestalt and threshold for surgical intervention by surveying an international cohort of neurosurgeons.

METHODS

A web-based survey was circulated via email list of attendants of the 2019 Canadian Pediatric Neurosurgery Study Group (CPNSG) and International Society of Pediatric Neurosurgery (ISPN) mailing list. The survey consisted of 8 clinical scenarios involving patients with MCF arachnoid cysts. Demographic variables of respondents and their decisions regarding management for each scenario were analyzed using R computing software.

RESULTS

A total of 107 respondents were included. Cysts in asymptomatic patients (92%), younger age at diagnosis (81%), and presence of a mild learning delay were predominantly managed non-surgically (80.7 ± 9.4%). Patients with cyst enlargement, headaches, new seizures, or hemorrhage were divided between non-surgical (55.8 ± 3.3%) and surgical (44.2 ± 2.9%) management. Patients with contralateral hemiparesis were treated predominantly surgically (67%). For both Galassi I and II, papilledema was favored as the primary indication for surgical intervention in 54% of patients. Those inclined to surgery (n = 17) were more likely to practice and train outside North America compared to those not pro-surgical (adjusted P = 0.092).

CONCLUSION

Incidental MCF arachnoid cysts in asymptomatic patients and younger age of diagnosis are predominantly managed non-surgically. Mild learning delay was not considered an indication to intervene. In contrast, radiological progression, hemorrhagic evolution, or non-focal neurological deficits lead to uncertainty in management, while focal neurological deficits and papilledema with MCF cysts were favored to be intervened surgically. Among the provider level factors, only location of training and practice trended towards a pro-surgery approach.

The impact of limited access to electronic medical records on neurosurgical care within the CARICOM countries: A survey and scoping review

Introduction

Global access to electronic medical records (EMRs) continues to grow, however many countries including those within the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) lack access to this system. Minimal research investigating EMR use in this region exists.

Research question

How does limited EMR access impact neurosurgical care within the CARICOM?

Materials and methods

The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Scopus, PubMed/MEDLINE databases, and grey literature were queried for studies addressing this issue within the CARICOM and low- and/or middle-income countries (LMICs). A comprehensive search for hospitals within the CARICOM was performed and responses to a survey inquiring about neurosurgery availability and EMR access within each facility were recorded.

Results

26 out of 87 surveys were returned leading to a response rate of 29.0%. Among the survey respondents, 57.7% stated neurosurgery was provided at their facility; however, only 38.4% admitted to using an EMR system. Paper charting was the primary means of record keeping for the majority of the facilities (61.5%). The most frequently reported barriers stalling EMR implementation were financial limitations (73.6%) and poor internet access (26.3%). A total of 14 articles were included in the scoping review. Results from these studies suggest that limited EMR access contributes to suboptimal neurosurgical outcomes within the CARICOM and LMICs.

Discussion and conclusion

This paper is the first to address the impact that limited EMR has on neurosurgical outcomes in the CARICOM. The lack of research addressing this issue also highlights the need for ongoing efforts to increase research output focused on EMR accessibility and neurosurgical outcomes in these countries.

Consensus recommendations on how to assess the quality of surgical interventions

Postoperative complications represent a major public health burden worldwide. Without standardized, clinically relevant and universally applied endpoints, the evaluation of surgical interventions remains ill-defined and inconsistent, opening the door for biased interpretations and hampering patient-centered health care delivery. We conducted a Jury-based consensus conference incorporating the perspectives of different stakeholders, who based their recommendations on the work of nine panels of experts. The recommendations cover the selection of postoperative outcomes from the perspective of patients and other stakeholders, comparison and interpretation of outcomes, consideration of cultural and demographic factors, and strategies to deal with unwarranted outcomes. With the recommendations developed exclusively by the Jury, we provide a framework for surgical outcome assessment and quality improvement after medical interventions, that integrates the main stakeholders' perspectives.

Partnering to build surgical capacity in low-resource settings: a qualitative study of Canadian global surgeons

OBJECTIVES

This qualitative study aimed to explore the perspectives of Canadian global surgeons with experience developing surgical education partnerships with low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) for the purpose of identifying factors for success.

DESIGN

A purposive sample of leaders from global surgery programmes at Canadian Faculties of Medicine participated in virtual semi-structured interviews. A six-phase thematic analysis was performed using a constructivist lens on verbatim transcripts by three independent researchers. Key factors for success were thematically collated with constant comparison and inter-investigator triangulation in NVivo software until theoretical saturation was reached.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifteen surgeons, representing 11 subspecialties at 6 Canadian academic institutions and a combined experience across 6 continents, were interviewed between January and June 2022.

RESULTS

Four facilitators for success of global surgery training programmes were identified, with a strong undertone of relationship-building permeating all subthemes: (1) facilitative skill sets and infrastructure, (2) longitudinal engagement, (3) local ownership and (4) interpersonal humility. Participants defined facilitative skill sets to include demonstrated surgical competence and facilitative infrastructure to include pre-existing local networks, language congruency, sustainable funding and support from external organisations. They perceived longitudinal engagement as spanning multiple trips, enabled by strong personal motivation and arrangements at their home institutions. Ownership of projects by local champions, including in research output, was noted as key to preventing brain drain and catalysing a ripple effect of surgical trainees. Finally, interviewees emphasised interpersonal humility as being crucial to decolonising the institution of global surgery with cultural competence, reflexivity and sustainability.

CONCLUSIONS

The interviewed surgeons perceived strong cross-cultural relationships as fundamental to all other dimensions of success when working in low-resource capacity-building. While this study presents a comprehensive Canadian perspective informed by high-profile leadership in global surgery, a parallel study highlighting LMIC-partners' perspectives will be critical to a more complete understanding of programme success.

Assessing the Success and Sustainability of Global Neurosurgery Collaborations: Systematic Review and Adaptation of the Framework for Assessment of InteRNational Surgical Success Criteria

BACKGROUND

The high unmet neurosurgical burden in low- and middle-income countries has necessitated multiple global neurosurgical collaborations. We identified these collaborations and their peer-reviewed journal publications and evaluated them using a modified version of the Framework for Assessment of InteRNational Surgical Success (FAIRNeSS).

METHODS

A systematic literature review yielded 265 articles describing neurosurgery-focused collaborations. A subset of 101 papers from 17 collaborations were evaluated with the modified FAIRNeSS criteria. Analysis of trends was performed for both individual articles and collaborations.

RESULTS

Most of the articles were general reviews (64), and most focused on clinical research (115). The leading collaboration focus was workforce and infrastructure development (45%). Composite FAIRNeSS scores ranged from 7/34 to 30/34. Average FAIRNeSS scores for individual articles ranged from 0.25 to 26.75, while collaboration-wide FAIRNeSS score averages ranged from 5.25 to 20.04. There was significant variability within each subset of FAIRNeSS indicators (P value <0.001). Short-term goals had higher scores than medium- and long-term goals (P value <0.001). Collaboration composite scores correlated with the number of papers published (R2 = 0.400, P = 0.007) but not with the number of years active (R2 = 0.072, P = 0.3). Finally, the overall agreement between reviewers was 53.5%, and the overall correlation was 38.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Global neurosurgery has no established metrics for evaluating collaborations; therefore, we adapted the FAIRNeSS criteria to do so. The criteria may not be well suited for measuring the success and sustainability of global neurosurgery collaborations, creating a need to develop a more applicable alternate set of metrics.

Educating the Next Generation of Global Neurosurgeons: Competencies, Skills, and Resources for Medical Students Interested in Global Neurosurgery

BACKGROUND

Global neurosurgery operates at the intersection of neurosurgery and public health. Although most global neurosurgery initiatives have targeted neurosurgeons and trainees, medical students represent the future of global neurosurgery.

METHODS

A narrative review of the literature regarding research methodology, education, economics, health policy, health advocacy, relevant to global neurosurgery was conducted.

RESULTS

We summarize pearls that all medical students interested in global neurosurgery should know.

DISCUSSION

To become effective agents of change within global neurosurgery, medical students must master competencies of motivation, organization, collaborativeness, dependability, flexibility, resilience, creative problem-solving, ethical thinking, cultural humility, and global awareness and gain knowledge and skills regarding research, education, policy making, and advocacy. Discussions with neurosurgeons and trainees, neurosurgery interest groups, conferences, university global neurosurgery initiatives, and student organizations represent opportunities for learning and becoming involved in global neurosurgery.