Differential effects of CD28 costimulation upon cytokine production by CD4+ and CD8+ T cells

Antibody response to pneumococcal and influenza vaccination in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving abatacept

BACKGROUND

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), including those treated with biologics, are at increased risk of some vaccine-preventable infections. We evaluated the antibody response to standard 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) and the 2011-2012 trivalent seasonal influenza vaccine in adults with RA receiving subcutaneous (SC) abatacept and background disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs).

METHODS

Two multicenter, open-label sub-studies enrolled patients from the ACQUIRE (pneumococcal and influenza) and ATTUNE (pneumococcal) studies at any point during their SC abatacept treatment cycle following completion of ≥3 months' SC abatacept. All patients received fixed-dose abatacept 125 mg/week with background DMARDs. A pre-vaccination blood sample was taken, and after 28 ± 3 days a final post-vaccination sample was collected. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving an immunologic response to the vaccine at Day 28 among patients without a protective antibody level to the vaccine antigens at baseline (pneumococcal: defined as ≥2-fold increase in post-vaccination titers to ≥3 of 5 antigens and protective antibody level of ≥1.6 μg/mL to ≥3 of 5 antigens; influenza: defined as ≥4-fold increase in post-vaccination titers to ≥2 of 3 antigens and protective antibody level of ≥1:40 to ≥2 of 3 antigens). Safety and tolerability were evaluated throughout the sub-studies.

RESULTS

Pre- and post-vaccination titers were available for 113/125 and 186/191 enrolled patients receiving the PPSV23 and influenza vaccine, respectively. Among vaccinated patients, 47/113 pneumococcal and 121/186 influenza patients were without protective antibody levels at baseline. Among patients with available data, 73.9 % (34/46) and 61.3 % (73/119) met the primary endpoint and achieved an immunologic response to PPSV23 or influenza vaccine, respectively. In patients with pre- and post-vaccination data available, 83.9 % in the pneumococcal study demonstrated protective antibody levels with PPSV23 (titer ≥1.6 μg/mL to ≥3 of 5 antigens), and 81.2 % in the influenza study achieved protective antibody levels (titer ≥1:40 to ≥2 of 3 antigens) at Day 28 post-vaccination. Vaccines were well tolerated with SC abatacept with background DMARDs.

CONCLUSIONS

In these sub-studies, patients with RA receiving SC abatacept and background DMARDs were able to mount an appropriate immune response to pneumococcal and influenza vaccines.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT00559585 (registered 15 November 2007) and NCT00663702 (registered 18 April 2008).

CD28 ligation increases macrophage suppression of T-cell proliferation

When compared to spleen or lymph node cells, resident peritoneal cavity cells respond poorly to T-cell activation in vitro. The greater proportional representation of macrophages in this cell source has been shown to actively suppress the T-cell response. Peritoneal macrophages exhibit an immature phenotype (MHC class II(lo), B7(lo)) that reduces their efficacy as antigen-presenting cells. Furthermore, these cells readily express inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), an enzyme that promotes T-cell tolerance by catabolism of the limiting amino acid arginine. Here, we investigate the ability of exogenous T-cell costimulation to recover the peritoneal T-cell response. We show that CD28 ligation failed to recover the peritoneal T-cell response and actually suppressed responses that had been recovered by inhibiting iNOS. As indicated by cytokine ELISpot and neutralizing monoclonal antibody (mAb) treatment, this 'cosuppression' response was due to CD28 ligation increasing the number of interferon (IFN)-γ-secreting cells. Our results illustrate that cellular composition and cytokine milieu influence T-cell costimulation biology.Cellular & Molecular Immunology advance online publication, 23 April 2012; doi:10.1038/cmi.2012.13.

Cytokine treatment of macrophage suppression of T cell activation

High Mphi:T cell ratios suppress the immune response to the retroviral superantigen Mls by IFNgamma-triggered production of the arg- and trp-consuming enzymes iNOS and IDO. Attempts to reverse suppression by treatment with pro-inflammatory cytokines revealed that IL-6 improved the T cell response to Mls and the pro-hematopoietic cyokines IL-3 and GM-CSF increased suppression. GM-CSF treatment increased Mphi expression of CD80, a ligand for the immune suppressive B7H1 and CTLA-4 receptors. These results illustrate potential strategies for reversing the suppression of cell-mediated immunity characteristic of the high Mphi:T cell ratios found in many tumors.

Glucocorticoid-induced TNFR-related protein lowers the threshold of CD28 costimulation in CD8+ T cells

CD28 is well characterized as a costimulatory molecule in T cell activation. Recent evidences indicate that TNFR superfamily members, including glucocorticoid-induced TNFR-related protein (GITR), act as costimulatory molecules. In this study, the relationship between GITR and CD28 has been investigated in murine CD8(+) T cells. When suboptimal doses of anti-CD3 Ab were used, the absence of GITR lowered CD28-induced activation in these cells whereas the lack of CD28 did not affect the response of CD8(+) T cells to GITR costimulus. In fact, costimulation of CD28 in anti-CD3-activated GITR(-/-) CD8(+) T cells resulted in an impaired increase of proliferation, impaired protection from apoptosis, and an impaired rise of activation molecules such as IL-2R, IL-2, and IFN-gamma. Most notably, CD28-costimulated GITR(-/-) CD8(+) T cells revealed lower NF-kappaB activation. As a consequence, up-regulation of Bcl-x(L), one of the major target proteins of CD28-dependent NF-kappaB activation, was defective in costimulated GITR(-/-) CD8(+) T cells. What contributed to the response to CD28 ligation in CD8(+) T cells was the early up-regulation of GITR ligand on the same cells, the effect of which was blocked by the addition of a recombinant GITR-Fc protein. Our results indicate that GITR influences CD8(+) T cell response to CD28 costimulation, lowering the threshold of CD8(+) T cell activation.

Peritoneal macrophages suppress T-cell activation by amino acid catabolism

T-lymphocyte activation triggered by anti-CD3, endogenous or exogenous superantigen, and mitogens was suppressed in a cell-dose-dependent fashion by peritoneal cavity (PerC) leucocytes. Study of lymphocyte-deficient mice and the use of multiparameter fluorescence-activated cell sorter analyses revealed that macrophages were responsible for this form of immune regulation. Interferon-gamma was essential to trigger suppression, which, by enzyme inhibition studies, was shown to be the result of tryptophan and arginine catabolism. These results illustrate that macrophages, which are classically defined by their innate effector function as antigen-presenting cells, have the potential to temper adaptive immunity.

The molecular immunology of mucositis: implications for evidence-based research in alternative and complementary palliative treatments

The terms 'mucositis' and 'stomatitis' are often used interchangeably. Mucositis, however, pertains to pharyngeal-esophago-gastrointestinal inflammation that manifests as red, burn-like sores or ulcerations throughout the mouth. Stomatitis is an inflammation of the oral tissues proper, which can present with or without sores, and is made worse by poor dental hygiene. Mucositis is observed in a variety of immunosuppressed patients, but is most often consequential to cancer therapy. It appears as early as the third day of intervention, and is usually established by Day 7 of treatment. Mucositis increases mortality and morbidity and contributes to rising health care costs. The precise immune components involved in the etiology of mucositis are unclear, but evidence-based research (EBR) data has shown that applications of granulocyte-macrophage-colony stimulating factor prevent the onset or the exacerbation of oropharyngeal mucositis. The molecular implications of this observation are discussed from the perspective of future developments of complementary and alternative treatments for this condition. It must be emphasized that this article is meant to be neither a review on mucositis and the various treatments for it, nor a discussion paper on its underlying molecular immunology. It is a statement of the implications of EBR for CAM-based interventions for mucositis. It explores and discusses the specific domain of molecular immunology in the context of mucositis and its direct implications for EBR research in CAM-based treatments for mucositis.