Influence of glutathione S-transferase T1 donor/recipient mismatch and anti-GSTT1 antibodies in hepatic graft-versus-host-disease

Denovo granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor antibody production has been linked to acute graft-versus-host disease following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from an HLA-matched, unrelated donor

The role of non-HLA antibodies in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) is not established. Serum samples collected from 58 adult patients before and after HSCT were examined for non-HLA antibodies. Following HSCT, 47 out of 58 patients (81.0 %) had various antibody patterns, with 23 of them (39.7 %) producing denovo antibodies. The most prevalent antibodies were directed against granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). The Fisher exact test revealed a statistically significant correlation between the incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease and denovo production of GM-CSF antibodies in patients fully HLA-matched with their donors (p = 0.001). There were no cases of denovo GM-CSF antibody production seen in non-permissively HLA-mismatched patients. Consequently, we hypothesize that the development of aGVHD after HLA-matched HSCT may differ from that following HLA-mismatched HSCT.

Evaluating the Clinical Relevance of Antibodies against Non-Human Leukocyte Antigen in Kidney Transplantation

Introduction: Kidney transplantation is the preferred modality of kidney replacement therapy for eligible patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), given that it has been found to reduce mortality rates, improve quality of life, and is cost-effective compared to dialysis. Recent advancements in human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing and donor-specific antibody (DSA) detection have helped to reduce the risk of rejection, but antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) can still occur without DSA. Previous studies suggest that rejection can be attributed to antibodies against Non-Human Leucocyte Antigens (non-HLAs). We aimed to acquire further understanding of the prevalence and distribution of non-HLA antibodies in our local population and attempt to correlate these findings with graft outcomes, as well as assess whether non-HLA antibodies can be utilized to determine graft impairment and dysfunction. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study involving kidney transplant recipients between January 2010 and December 2020. All included individuals were aged over 18 and underwent kidney-alone transplants; were ABO- and HLA-compatible; and were matched at A, B, and DR loci (mismatch 0:0:0). HLA testing was negative at the time of transplantation. The samples from both cases of early graft rejection and the control group were tested for non-HLA antibodies using One Lambda LABScreenTM, Autoantibody kit groups 1, 2, and 3, as well as the Immucor LIFECODES non-HLA autoantibody assay. Results: A total of 850 kidney transplant recipients were included, in which 12 patients experienced early graft rejection within the first month post transplant and 18 patients who did not experience graft rejection were selected as study controls. Our study reported no correlation between the total burden of non-HLA antibodies and early rejection, most likely as the result of a small sample size. Nevertheless, a sub-analysis revealed that specific high-frequency pre-transplant non-HLA antibodies such as GSTT, CXCL11, CXCL10, and HNR, detected by LIFECODES, were associated with rejection (Fisher's exact test with Bonferroni correction, p < 0.001). Most pre-transplant non-HLA antibody levels were reduced after transplantation, which was attributed to immunosuppression. Conclusion: The 'high frequency' non-HLA antibodies displayed an association with graft rejection, though the overall associations between the burden of non-HLA antibodies and rejection episodes remain inconclusive. Further work is needed to establish the rebound phenomenon of non-HLA antibodies, the development of de novo non-HLA antibodies in the long run, and their implications on graft survival.

De novo recipient-specific Glutathione S-transferase T1 antibody development after HLA-identical hematopoietic cell transplantation

Donor-specific antibodies against Glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) have been associated with de novo immune hepatitis after liver transplantation. These antibodies have also been found very early in allo-HCT associated with acute hepatic GvHD but in all the cases the donor cells had experienced previous priming through pregnancies. It remained to be explored whether or not primary recognition of the antigen occurs after HCT and what could be the consequences in the long term outcome. We genotyped a cohort of 68 HCT patients and found 11 with the GSTT1 null donor/positive recipient mismatch. After testing 114 serum samples, we found a unique case of a 33-year-old patient transplanted from his HLA-identical sibling donor in which IgG GSTT1 antibodies were detected for the first time on day +178. After stimulation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells with GSTT1 peptides we could demonstrate that this patient also had GSTT1-specific T lymphocytes that became activated upon exposure to the GSTT1 antigen. In this report, we describe the first case in which simultaneous T and B cell response against GSTT1 is developed in HCT although the clinical consequences in GvHD are still unclear.

Mismatch on glutathione S-transferase T1 increases the risk of graft-versus-host disease and mortality after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Several drug-metabolizing enzymes, preferentially expressed in the liver, have the potential to act as minor histocompatibility antigens. In the present study, we analyzed the impact of glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1), glutathione S-transferase M1, glutathione S-transferase P1, and UDP glucuronosyl transferase 2B17 (UGT2B17) disparities on the outcome of 125 patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Grades 2 to 4 acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) developed in 56.2% versus 73.3% of GSTT1-matched versus mismatched patients (P = .048). Remarkably, 8.6% GSTT1-matched patients developed grades 2 to 4 liver aGVHD, compared with 36.8% among GSTT1-mismatched recipients (P < .001). Regarding chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD), 34.8% versus 70.7% matched versus mismatched patients developed overall cGVHD (P = .038) and 16.3% versus 48% developed hepatic cGVHD (P = .006). We also found a strong association between the UGT2B17 mismatch and the risk of severe aGVHD (P = .001), especially with gut involvement (P < .001). Most striking was the influence of the GSTT1 mismatch on nonrelapse mortality (26.8% versus 52.6%, P = .031) and overall survival (62% versus 36.9%, P = .045). In summary, UGT2B17 and GSTT1 mismatch are risk factors for the development of GVHD and the latter also influences on mortality and survival after allogeneic transplantation from HLA-identical donors.