Floating knee: a modified Fraser's classification and the results of a series of 28 cases

Advances in Understanding and Managing Floating Knee Injuries: A Comprehensive Review

Fractures of the ipsilateral tibia and femur, frequently combined with soft tissue damage and dislocations, describe floating knee injuries, a complicated orthopedic condition. Epidemiological data suggest that floating knee injuries account for a small but significant proportion of traumatic orthopedic injuries, with a higher incidence observed in younger males engaged in high-risk activities. Anatomically, floating knee injuries involve fractures of the femur and tibia, ligamentous disruptions, and soft tissue damage, contributing to the complexity and severity of these injuries. An extensive analysis of floating knee injuries is given in this paper, including information about epidemiology, anatomy, pathophysiology, categorization, management approaches, complications, prognosis, and current and upcoming developments.

Simultaneous ipsilateral floating hip and knee: the double floating extremity-a systematic review and proposal of a treatment algorithm

PURPOSE

To systematically review the currently available existing evidence related to the presentation and management of simultaneous floating hip and knee injuries to identify injury characteristics, treatment strategies, and complications.

METHODS

Data sources: Relevant articles were identified by searching Medline, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases with no language restrictions. Manual searches of other relevant databases (SciELO and grey literature databases) and reference lists of primary articles found from initial searches were also conducted.

STUDY SELECTION

All types of study designs published from January 1st, 2000 to October 1st, 2022 involving skeletally mature patients with simultaneous floating hip and knee injuries were included.

DATA EXTRACTION

Basic information and specific injury-related information were collected.

RESULTS

Eight case reports were included. No study adequately reported the case with sufficient detail to allow other investigators to make inferences, nor was the result properly calculated, nor was the follow-up considered adequate for adequate functional assessment to occur in 80% of the studies.

CONCLUSION

The exact treatment strategy and the follow-up time are not uniform across the included studies; therefore, they are not sufficient to adequately recommend surgical approach, timing of fixation, and fixation method. Our findings warrant the need for better documentation and reporting information about the mode of treatment of simultaneous floating hip and knee injuries.

The current issues and challenges in the management of floating knee injury: a retrospective study

Purpose

The management of floating knee injuries is still controversial and challenging for trauma specialists. This study aims to evaluate the incidence of the floating knee in lower limb trauma, analyzing the challenges in its management, and factors affecting clinical outcomes.

Methods

In this mono-center retrospective study, 36 consecutive patients were included. All individuals were diagnosed with an ipsilateral fracture of the femur and tibia, managed surgically according to their fracture pattern (Fraser classification), and the severity of the injury. The timing for each operation was determined based on the general condition of the patient and the local physiological condition of soft tissues. The patients' clinical outcomes were finally evaluated based on their Karlstrom and Olerud scores and were categorized as excellent, good, acceptable, fair, or poor.

Results

In this study, the mean follow-up period was 51.39 ± 16.02 months (11-130 months). Incidence of the floating knee was 2.32% in all lower limb traumas. From this number, 16 patients suffered from floating knee injury in the left lower extremity, and 18 in the right lower limb, while in 2 patients the condition was bilateral. The most common injury mechanism was road traffic accidents, accounting for 28 (77.78%) cases. The outcome was as follows; Excellent to good results in 22 (61.11%) cases, acceptable results in 2 (5.56%) cases, and fair to poor results in 12 (33.33%) cases according to the Karlström-Olerud scoring system. The most frequent early complications were wound infection and deep venous thrombosis in 5 (13.88%) of the cases. The most common late complication was common peroneal nerve palsy recorded in 2 (5.56%) cases.

Conclusion

The presence of important concomitant injuries to the floating knee together with poor soft tissue conditions constituted important factors influencing possible management options and may have led to poorer clinical outcomes.

Early Total Care Versus Damage Control Orthopedics in Floating Knee Injury: Analysis of Radiological and Functional Outcomes

Introduction

Floating knee injury (FKI) occurs as a result of a high-velocity impact. We assessed the radiological and functional outcomes of FKIs treated by various fixation methods, by damage control orthopedics (DCO) or early total care (ETC).

Materials and methods

We investigated 46 patients with FKI who were operated on between January 2013 and January 2018 at the RL Jalappa Hospital and Research Center, Kolar, India. Functional assessments were evaluated using Karlström and Olerud’s criteria (KOC). Based on their treatments, the patients were divided into the damage control orthopedics group (n = 21) and the ETC group (n = 25). Statistical analyses were used to obtain and compare summary data.

Results

The data of 46 patients were collected. Fractures were classified using the modified Fraser’s classification. Five patients were not included in the final analysis because of death due to complications in the immediate postoperative period. In patients managed by DCO, after radiological union, the functional outcome was excellent in three cases, good in eight, fair in seven, and poor in two. The average time required for radiological union of the femur was 10.75 ± 1.482 months (P = 0.001); for tibia union, it was 10.25 ± 1.682 months (P = 0.011). The average range of knee flexion was 85°± 16.059° (P = 0.001), which was statistically significant. In patients managed by ETC, there were six cases with an excellent functional outcome, 13 with a good outcome, and two with a fair outcome. The average time required for radiological union of the femur was 9.29 ± 1.765 months (P = 0.006); for the tibia, it was 9.05 ± 1.161 months (P = 0.012). The average range of knee flexion was 100° ± 10.954° (P = 0.001), which was statistically significant. Fat embolism was noted in eight cases; four of these patients died due to multiorgan dysfunction. This was the major life-threatening complication in the early definitive fixation group. In the DCO group, only three cases had fat embolism, with one death due to multiorgan dysfunction. Early postoperative infection was a concern in the ETC group, evident in six cases.

Conclusion

The classification system for FKI needs further research, which must include multiple parameters. Fracture classification and patient selection are crucial considerations in deciding the best treatment for a particular fracture.

Floating knee injuries - An analytical study using a conglomerated comprehensive classification

PURPOSE

Floating knee injuries are complex high velocity injuries with a simultaneous breach of skeletal integrity both above and below the knee joint. Intraarticular fractures, severe comminution, soft tissue insult, associated other skeletal and systemic injuries have been the most common factors influencing the outcome. With our previous experience we framed a conglomerated comprehensive classification, which includes important prognosticating factors that influences the outcome. Aim of this study is to analyse the efficacy of this classification system for floating knee injury by studying the duration of hospitalisation, number of procedures required for completion of treatment, prognosticating functional outcomes and complications.

METHODS

This classification is a conglomeration of the existing standard classifications (Fraser, AO, Gustilo and Andersons) along with modifiers like disruption of exensor mechanism M1, avulsion fractures around knee M2 and fractures around hip and ankle joints M3. This classification system was applied to all FKI cases presented to our institution between 2015 and 2018, it has 4 types, 3 subtypes and 3 modifiers. 92 cases were prospectively analysed, the standard treatment protocol was followed as per flowchart, only stable and borderline stable patients were included, functional outcome and recovery of these patients was assessed using modified Karlstrom and Olerud scoring after fracture union. Demographic data, duration of hospitalisation, number of procedures required for completion of treatment, functional outcomes and complications were collected and statistical analysis was done.

RESULTS

Statistical Analysis showed significant difference between groups I and IV of conglomerated comprehensive classification in the number of days of hospitalisation and number of procedures with p value 0.006 and 0.018 respectively.

CONCLUSION

Conglomerated comprehensive classification using prognostic factors and existing standard classifications enables better prognostication of these complex floating knee injuries. Identifing and addressing these factors and modifiers included in this classification system will surely improve the outcome. A multicentric study will validate this classifaction in a better way.

Neglected infected floating knee injury: evaluation of closed reduction techniques

PURPOSE

Floating knee injury is uncommon yet challenging problem. The situation is more complicated by presence of infection, open comminuted fractures, and late presentation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the closed reduction techniques by circular external fixation in a single stage to treat patients having infected neglected floating knee injuries.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 19 patients with a mean age of 34.4 years. The average duration from trauma to surgery was 51.1 days. All patients had at least one infected open fracture. According to Fraser's classification, ten injuries were type I, one case was type IIa, four were type IIb, and four were type IIc. Patients were treated by closed reduction techniques using the Ilizarov principles. Orthoplastic procedures were done in four cases in the same surgical setting.

RESULTS

Closed reduction and union were achieved in all cases with control of infection in 17 cases. The follow-up period averaged 41 months. The mean knee flexion was 97.4°. The complications included 5° extension lag (two cases), malunion (three cases), refracture (two cases), and DVT (four cases). The bone results were excellent (12 cases), good (5 cases), and poor (2 cases). The functional results were excellent (two cases), good (seven cases), acceptable (seven cases), and poor (three cases).

CONCLUSIONS

Closed reduction techniques using a circular frame provided a valid treatment option for infected neglected floating knee injuries in one stage without bone grafting. However, the high rate of complications and the diminished knee range of motion should be considered.

Challenges and outcomes in the treatment of floating knees. A case series of ipsilateral femur and tibia fractures around the knee

BACKGROUND

Ipsilateral femur and tibia fractures around the knee (floating knee) are rare injuries that threaten both limb viability and patient life. A correct surgical strategy is essential to reduce complications and sequelae. The aim of this study was to evaluate characteristics and results of treatment in patients with a floating knee treated at a single trauma center.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a retrospective and non-consecutive case series of 18 floating knees occurred in 17 patients. All patients were operated in a single third-level public and university hospital from December 2010 to December 2018. Data on demographics, injuries, treatment and follow-up were collected. A general health questionnaire (SF-12) and a knee functional questionnaire (KOOS-PS) were used to display results.

RESULTS

We identified 13 men and 4 women, aged between 16 and 52. Mean follow-up period was 16.49 months. High-energy trauma following a traffic collision was the most frequent mechanism. Mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 39.05, and a damage control strategy was used in 15 (83.33%) injuries. Extra-articular fractures (Fraser I) largely predominated, resulting in double intramedullary nailing in 72.22% of cases. Eleven injuries (61.11%) presented with an open fracture. Complications appeared in 6 (33.33%) injuries, being 3 infections. Mean score for the SF-12 was 35.59 for the physical dimension and 50.44 for mental dimension. Mean score for the KOOS-PS was 43.64.

CONCLUSION

Floating knee injuries usually occur in polytrauma contexts. Visceral involvement and exposed fractures are common, so the most appropriate strategy is usually a staged treatment. Complications and sequelae are frequent.

The Floating Knee Injuries: Does it Need a New Classification System?

BACKGROUND

This study aims to determine the differences between the clinical and radiological results of patients based on Karlstrom-Olerud Scoring System who cannot be included in any classification for floating knee injuries and to seek an answer to the question of whether a new classification is needed.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Seventy patients with floating knee injuries treated in our clinic were retrospectively analyzed between 2008 and 2019 in the study. The results of fractures that classifiable and unclassifiable according to the Fraser, Blake and McBryde classifications were statistically compared based on the Karlstrom-Olerud criteria.

RESULTS

Seventy patients, 64 males and 6 females, participated in the study. The mean age of our patients was 32.3 ± 12.55 (18-68) years. The mean follow-up period of the patients was 30.26 ± 18.19 months (11-60 months). The results of the fractures that could not be classified according to the Blake and McBryde classification were statistically poorer than the results of those that could be classified according to the criteria (p = 0.041).The results of the fractures that could not be classified according to the Fraser classification were statistically poorer than the results of those that could be classified according to the criteria defined by Karlstrom and Olerud (p = 0.010).

CONCLUSION

We observed that floating knee injuries that we could and could not classify led to different clinical results. In conclusion, we think that there is a need for a new floating knee classification that includes segmental fractures, patellar fractures and open fractures.

Management of the Floating Knee: Ipsilateral Fractures of the Femur and Tibia

The "floating knee" is defined as fractures of the ipsilateral femur and tibia, which consists of a spectrum of injury, and may be in isolation or part of multiple system trauma for a given patient. A floating knee may compromise limb viability due to severe soft-tissue and vascular injury. Expeditious fracture reduction and patient resuscitation are crucial, while type and timing of provisional and definitive management is guided by the extent of injury to the involved extremity and associated systemic injuries. Numerous surgical techniques are available to treat the floating knee, including external fixation and internal fixation with plates or intramedullary nails. Fracture complexity and severity of soft-tissue injury present challenges, with articular injuries potentially more debilitating in the long term. Complications such as infection, deep vein thrombosis, knee stiffness, nonunion, malunion, and posttraumatic arthrosis after these injuries should be considered.

Implant-associated Hoffa's Fracture in a Floating Knee: A Case Report and Review of Literature

Introduction:

Complex floating knee in the presence of a previous implant creates an unusual fracture pattern which is a rare entity and poses a unique challenge in management and subsequent rehabilitation.

Case Report:

A 56-year-old psychiatric patient who jumped from height had a polytrauma and a floating knee injury. Following the primary care and damage control surgery with knee-spanning fixator at some other centers, he was shifted to us on ventilator care and was directly admitted to intensive care unit for further management. On presentation, it was a floating knee injury with gross comminution of both femur and tibia with associated Hoffa with bent implant in situ. It was managed by plating of both lower end femur and tibia and at the end of 6 months, showed a satisfactory outcome.

Conclusion:

Floating knee injuries further complicated by the presence of the previous implant in a polytrauma situation poses a unique challenge which requires meticulous surgical planning and prolonged rehabilitation to achieve satisfactory outcome.

Prevalence of Deep Surgical Site Infection After Repair of Periarticular Knee Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

IMPORTANCE

Surgical management of periarticular knee fractures can be challenging, and adverse outcomes may be severe. Recent literature indicates that the rate of periarticular knee surgical site infection (SSI) may range from 2% to 88% depending on the fracture site.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the prevalence of deep SSI and the rate of septic arthritis after surgical repair of fractures around the knee.

DATA SOURCES

The electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from their inception to July 1, 2018.

STUDY SELECTION

Eligible studies had to specifically report deep SSI rates and include fractures in the distal femur, patella, tibial plateau, or proximal tibia. Risk factors that were associated with increased the risk of deep SSI were also examined.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. Data were extracted by multiple investigators. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software was used for the pooling of data, using either random-effects or fixed-effects models, with respect to the degree of statistical heterogeneity present. Data analyses were conducted in October 2019.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was overall prevalence of deep SSI after periarticular knee fracture repair. The secondary outcomes were the overall prevalence of septic arthritis, risk factors associated with deep SSI, and the most commonly cultured bacteria specimens found periarticular knee infections.

RESULTS

Of 6928 articles screened, 117 articles met inclusion criteria and were included in analysis. Among 11 432 patients included in analysis, 653 patients (5.7%) experienced deep SSIs, most commonly among patients with proximal tibia fractures (56 of 872 patients [6.4%]). Among studies that included information on septic arthritis, 38 of 1567 patients (2.4%) experienced septic arthritis. The 2 most commonly reported bacteria were methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, found in 67 SSIs, and methicillin-susceptible S aureus, found in 53 SSIs. Sixty-two studies (53.0%) in the sample received a Coleman Methodological Score of poor (<50 points).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Deep SSIs occurred in nearly 6% of periarticular knee fracture repairs, and 2.4% of SSIs were associated with septic arthritis. Surgeons managing these injuries should be vigilant when wounds are not pristine. Efforts should be made to elevate the quality of research conducted not only in this subject but also in orthopedic surgery as a whole.

Challenges in the management of floating knee injuries: Results of treatment and outcomes of 224 consecutive cases in 10 years

INTRODUCTION

Floating knee is a flail knee joint resulting from fractures of the shafts or adjacent metaphyses of the femur and the ipsilateral tibia. It is usually associated with several complications and mortality. This study was designed to present our experience with the treatment of this injury.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

This study was performed between January 2004 and December 2014. 224 cases of floating knee injuries gathered from the 34,480 lower extremities trauma files were studied, and the target information recorded. The injuries most frequently occurred in subjects between 16 and 35 years of age (60.71%), and in male subjects (85.71%). The most frequent mechanism of injury was traffic accident (92.85%). External fixation was the common type of treatment (82.14%) in emergency or as a definitive treatment. The treatment was performed within 24 h of the trauma. We performed a 36-month follow up with clinical examination, radiographs, assessing the complications, and using the Modified Cincinnati Rating System Questionnaire (MCRSQ) and the Karlström/Olerud Score (KOS) to evaluate the progression of the outcomes.

RESULTS

Early complications included 8 cases of compartment syndrome, 60 open fractures and 24 partially amputated limbs. A total amputation was performed in 3 patients. The most common late complication was heterotopic calcifications of the knee (n = 68, 30.6%). Good scores for MCRSQ and KOS were obtained only after patients were sent to a reference center for knee surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience revealed that the complication rate associated with floatingknee injuries remains high, regardless of the performed treatment. Surgeons should focus on reducing complications while treating these severe injuries.

Fracture patterns in patients with multiple fractures: the probability of multiple fractures and the most frequently associated regions

INTRODUCTION

Multiple fractures are of high clinical relevance, as a significant increase in mortality rate has been described. The purpose of this study was to evaluate differences in age and gender distribution in multiple fractures dependent on severity of trauma. Furthermore, affected anatomic regions and frequently associated fracture regions were investigated.

METHODS

Patients who had sustained multiple fractures between 2000 and 2012 were included in this study. At hospital admission, patients were divided according to trauma severity (high- vs low-traumatic), gender, and age for demographic analysis. Fractures were grouped in anatomical regions, and multiple fracture event probabilities as well as frequently associated regions were calculated.

RESULTS

In total, 25,043 patients at an age range of 0-100 years (5.8% of all fracture patients; 14,769 male and 10,274 female patients) who sustained 57,862 multiple fractures were included. The lumbar/thoracic spine, cervical spine, femoral shaft, skull, and pelvis showed a probability of more than 40% of the presence of further fractures in each high-traumatic fracture event. In high-traumatic fracture events, male patients were more affected (p < 0.001). Considering low-traumatic fractures, female patients had a significantly higher proportion (p < 0.001) of multiple fractures among all fractures than male patients.

CONCLUSIONS

As a novelty, gender as well as age distributions in multiple fracture patients and a probability statement with the most affected anatomic regions, the risk of presence of further fractures for every region, and the frequently associated fracture regions including the percentage of occurrence are provided. These aspects yield new opportunities for clinical work and may reduce the high rate of overlooked fractures stated in the literature.

WITHDRAWN: Challenges in the management of floating knee injuries: Results of treatment and outcomes of 224 consecutive cases in 10 years

The Publisher regrets that this article is an accidental duplication of an article that has already been published in Injury, 50(2) (2019) 453–461, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2018.12.009. The duplicate article has therefore been withdrawn. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal.

Variables affecting functional outcome in floating knee injuries

BACKGROUND

The surgical outcome of floating knee injuries is difficult to predict. The high-velocity nature of the injury, complex fracture pattern and associated soft tissue/visceral injuries may have some impact on the functional outcome. The present study evaluates the variables affecting the clinical and radiological outcomes of floating knee injuries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The clinical, radiological and functional outcome (Karlstrom and Olegrud criteria) of 89 patients with 90 floating knee injuries were evaluated at the end of one year who were managed in our level 1 trauma center between January 2013 and December 2016. The details of the injury, fracture pattern, management and complications were collected retrospectively from their records.

RESULTS

There were 81 (91.1%) males and 8 (8.9%) females with mean age of 34.34 ± 12.28 years. The mean time for tibia and femur union was 9.52 (±6.6) and 10.5 (±7.37) months. There was significant delay (p < 0.005) in time taken for union in segmental femur fractures (14.3 ± 9.6 months) compared to nonsegmental femur fractures (8.68 ± 5.18 months). Such significant difference in time taken for union was not seen in tibial segmental (10.6 ± 4.62 months) and nonsegmental fractures (9.05 ± 7.27 months). As per the Karlstrom and Olegrud criteria, there were 22 (24.4%) excellent, 26 (28.9%) good, 24 (26.7%) fair and 11 (12.2%) poor outcome. There were 15 patients with malunited tibia, 6 with malunited femur, 10 with limb length discrepancy and 39 with knee stiffness. 28 (33.3%) patients underwent major additional procedures such as bone grafting, re-fixation or bone transport or tendon transfer. It was observed that open tibia fracture, segmental fracture, intra-articular fracture, additional surgical procedures, initial external-fixator (ex-fix) application were significantly associated with development of knee stiffness, limb shortening, malalignment and unsatisfactory (Karlstrom and Olegrud fair to poor) functional outcome.

CONCLUSION

Open tibial fractures, segmental fractures, intraarticular involvement, additional surgical procedures and initial external fixator application are the poor prognostic indicators of floating knee injuries.

The floating knee: a review on ipsilateral femoral and tibial fractures

In 1975, Blake and McBryde established the concept of 'floating knee' to describe ipsilateral fractures of the femur and tibia.1 This combination is much more than a bone lesion; the mechanism is usually a high-energy trauma in a patient with multiple injuries and a myriad of other lesions.After initial evaluation patients should be categorised, and only stable patients should undergo immediate reduction and internal fixation with the rest receiving external fixation.Definitive internal fixation of both bones yields the best results in almost all series.Nailing of both bones is the optimal fixation when both fractures (femoral and tibial) are extra-articular.Plates are the 'standard of care' in cases with articular fractures.A combination of implants are required by 40% of floating knees.Associated ligamentous and meniscal lesions are common, but may be irrelevant in the case of an intra-articular fracture which gives the worst prognosis for this type of lesion. Cite this article: Muñoz Vives K, Bel J-C, Capel Agundez A, Chana Rodríguez F, Palomo Traver J, Schultz-Larsen M, Tosounidis, T. The floating knee. EFORT Open Rev 2016;1:375-382. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.1.000042.

Management of the Floating Knee in Polytrauma Patients

Ipsilateral fracture of the femur and tibia, or floating knee, is a rare injury that is found almost exclusively in polytrauma or high-energy trauma patients. It presents a combination of diaphyseal, metaphyseal and intra-articular fractures of the femur and tibia, with a high incidence of neurovascular, ligamentous and soft-tissue injuries. The functional outcome and, in some cases, the life, of such polytrauma patients depends largely on a correct therapeutic approach being taken. In general, the treatment decided upon will depend on the individual characteristics present, regarding aspects such as the patient’s general condition, the fracture line and the state of the soft tissues. The treatment provided may be the same as when single fractures are presented, but it is often necessary to consider whether certain techniques or surgical approaches may interfere with other lines of treatment. It is essential at all times to take into consideration the associated injuries and complications before deciding upon a treatment strategy. Ligamentous injuries play an important role in these injuries, much more so than when fractures occur singly. Therefore, these injuries require management by an experienced multidisciplinary team.

Traumatic Floating Knee: A Review of a Multi-Centric Series of 172 Cases in Adult

The traumatic floating knee in adults (FK) is a combined injury of the lower limb defined by ipsilateral fractures of the tibia and femur. The first publications emphasized the severity of injuries, the bad results after conservative treatment, the most severe functional outcome in case of articular fracture and the frequency of associated cruciate ligament injuries. The surgical management of FK has been highly modified according the improvement of the fracture fixation devices and the operative techniques. This retrospective multicentric observational study included 172 adults with a FK injury admitted in emergency in 5 different level I or II trauma centers. All the patients data were collected on an anonymized database. Results were evaluated by the overall clinical Karlström's score at latest follow-up. Fracture union was assessed on X-rays when at least 3 out of 4 cortices were in continuity in two different radiological planes. A statistical analysis was performed by a logistic regression method. Despite some limitations, this study confirms the general and local severity of this high-energy trauma, mainly occurring in young people around the third decade. A special effort should lead to a better initial diagnosis of associated ligamentous injury: a tear of PCL can be suspected on a lateral-ray view and a testing of the knee should be systematically performed after fixation of the fracture under anesthesia. Secondary MRI assessment is sometimes difficult to interpret because of hardware artifacts. The timing of fracture fixation is discussed on a case by case basis. However, a first femoral fixation is recommended except in cases of tibia fracture with major soft tissue lesion or leg ischemia requiring the tibia fixation first. Also a tibia stabilized facilitates the reduction and fixation of a complex distal femur fracture. The dual nailing remains so far for us the best treatment in Fraser I FK. Further prospective studies are needed to validate treatment algorithms, best fixation techniques in order to decrease the rate of complication and improve the functional outcome of floating knee injuries.