1
|
Zeelenberg ML, Van Lieshout EMM, Polinder S, Panneman MJM, Verhofstad MHJ, Den Hartog D. Trends in incidence, health care use and costs for subtrochanteric femur fractures in the Netherlands 2000-2019. Injury 2024; 55:111461. [PMID: 38457999 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Revised: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 02/25/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to provide population based trends in incidence rate, hospital length of stay (HLOS), trauma mechanism, and costs for healthcare and lost productivity of subtrochanteric femur fractures in the Netherlands. METHODS Data on patients with subtrochanteric femur fractures sustained between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2019 were extracted from the National Medical Registration of the Dutch Hospital Database. Incidence rates, HLOS, health care and productivity costs were calculated in sex- and age-specific groups. RESULTS A total of 14,399 patients sustained a subtrochanteric fracture in the 20-year study period. Incidence rates in the entire population dropped by 15.5 % from 4.5 to 3.8 per 100,000 person years (py). This decline was larger in women (6.4 to 5.2 per 100,000 py, -19.8 %) than in men (2.6 to 2.5 per 100,000 py, -4.0 %). HLOS declined by 62.5 % from a mean of 21.6 days in 2000-2004 to 8.1 days in 2015-2019. Subtrochanteric fractures were associated with total annual costs of €15.5 M, of which 91 % (€14.1 M) were health care costs and €1.3 M were costs due to lost productivity. Mean healthcare costs per case were lower in men (€16,394) than in women (€23,154). CONCLUSION The incidence rates and HLOS of subtrochanteric fractures in the Netherlands have decreased in the 2000-2019 study period and subtrochanteric fractures are associated with a relatively small total annual cost of €15.5 M. Increasing incidence rates and a bimodal age distribution, described in previous studies from other European countries, were not found in the Dutch population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miliaan L Zeelenberg
- Trauma Research Unit Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Esther M M Van Lieshout
- Trauma Research Unit Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Suzanne Polinder
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Michael H J Verhofstad
- Trauma Research Unit Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Dennis Den Hartog
- Trauma Research Unit Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cnossen JD, Panneman MJM, Polinder S, Verhofstad MHJ, Van Lieshout EMM. Trends in incidence, health care consumption, and medical and productivity costs of femoral shaft fractures in the Netherlands between 2005 and 2019. Injury 2023; 54:111140. [PMID: 37865546 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.111140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 10/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/23/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Population-based knowledge on the occurrence of femoral shaft fractures is necessary for allocation of health care services, optimization of preventive measures, and research purposes. This nationwide study aimed to provide an overview on the incidence of femoral shaft fractures over a 15-year period and to gain insight into health care consumption and work absence with associated costs in the Dutch population. METHODS Data of patients who sustained an acute femoral shaft fracture in the years 2005-2019 were extracted from the National Medical Registration of the Dutch Hospital Database. The incidence rate, hospital length of stay (HLOS), direct medical costs, productivity costs, and years lived with disability were calculated for age- and gender specific groups. RESULTS A total of 15,847 patients with a femoral shaft fracture were included. The incidence rate increased with 13 % over this 15-year period (5.71/100,000 persons per year in 2005 and 6.47/100,000 in 2019). The mean HLOS per patient was 13.8 days in 2005-2009 versus 8.4 days in 2015-2019 for the entire group. Mean HLOS per patient increased with age (10.0 days for age group 0-9 and 12.7 days for age group >80), but declined over time from 13.6 days in 2005-2009 to 8.8 days in 2015-2019 in males, and from 13.7 days and to 8.2 days, respectively, in females. The costs due to work absence was higher in males. Cumulative health care costs were highest in females >80 years (8.4 million euros versus 1.6 million in males). CONCLUSION The incidence rate of femoral shaft fractures increased over the past 15 years in the Netherlands. Mean HLOS per patient has decreased in all age groups and in both sexes. Health care costs were highest for female octogenarians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Daniël Cnossen
- Trauma Research Unit Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Suzanne Polinder
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, P.O. Box 2040, 3000, CA, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Michael H J Verhofstad
- Trauma Research Unit Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Esther M M Van Lieshout
- Trauma Research Unit Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Karimi D, Qvistgaard SW, Gundtoft PH, Brorson S, Viberg B. Unchanged incidence but change in treatment trends from 1996 to 2018: 23,718 humeral shaft fractures from the Danish National Patient Registry. Acta Orthop 2023; 94:523-529. [PMID: 37831408 PMCID: PMC10574250 DOI: 10.2340/17453674.2023.21125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 09/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Humeral shaft fractures (HSF) can be treated surgically or non-surgically. National trends and distributions are sparsely reported. We present the temporal trends in epidemiology of adult HSF in Denmark, with the primary aim of reporting HSF incidences, and the secondary aim of reporting on the primary treatment management. PATIENTS AND METHODS The diagnosis (International Classification of Diseases Version 10 [ICD-10]: S42.3) and surgical procedure codes for HSF were obtained from the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR) covering 1996-2018. The diagnosis code for HSF is validated in the DNPR with a positive predictive value of 89%. Patients aged 18 years and above were included. Surgical treatment was defined as a diagnosis of HSF combined with a surgical procedure within 3 weeks of injury. Cases without relevant registered procedures within 3 weeks were defined as nonsurgical treatment cases. RESULTS 23,718 HSF (62% female) were identified in the DNPR. The overall mean incidence was 25/100,000/year and was stable over 23 years. The population above 50 years accounted for 78% of all HSF. Non-surgical treatment accounted for 87% of treatments and was stable during the study period. Temporal changes were observed regarding surgical procedures; intramedullary nailing decreased from 57% to 26% and plate osteosynthesis increased from 12% to 69%. CONCLUSION The overall incidence for HSF remained stable from 1996 to 2018. Most cases were females aged 50 years and above. The preferred primary treatment for HSF was non-surgical for all ages. Plate osteosynthesis became more popular than intramedullary nailing over the study period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis Karimi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark.
| | - Søren Wacher Qvistgaard
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark
| | - Per Hviid Gundtoft
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark; Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Aarhus University Hospital
| | - Stig Brorson
- Centre for Evidence-Based Orthopedics, Zealand University Hospital and Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen
| | - Bjarke Viberg
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark; Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Odense University Hospital and Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zeelenberg ML, Den Hartog D, Panneman MJM, Polinder S, Verhofstad MHJ, Van Lieshout EMM. Trends in incidence, health care consumption, and costs for proximal femoral fractures in the Netherlands between 2000 and 2019: a nationwide study. Osteoporos Int 2023:10.1007/s00198-023-06774-y. [PMID: 37119329 PMCID: PMC10382328 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-023-06774-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/01/2023]
Abstract
This study evaluated the incidence rates and societal burden of hip fractures in The Netherlands. Although incidence in the elderly population is decreasing and hospital stay is at an all-time low, the burden of medical costs and crude numbers of proximal femoral fractures are still rising in our aging population. PURPOSE The aim of this nationwide study was to provide an overview of the incidence rate and economic burden of acute femoral neck and trochanteric fractures in The Netherlands. METHODS Data of patients who sustained acute proximal femoral fractures in the period January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2019, were extracted from the National Medical Registration of the Dutch Hospital Database. The incidence rate, hospital length of stay (HLOS), health care and lost productivity costs, and years lived with disability (YLD) were calculated for age- and sex-specific groups. RESULTS A total of 357,073 patients were included. The overall incidence rate increased by 22% over the 20-year study period from 16.4 to 27.1/100,000 person-years (py). The age-specific incidence rate in elderly > 65 years decreased by 16% (from 649.1 to 547.6/100,000 py). The incidence rate in men aged > 90 has surpassed the incidence rate in women. HLOS decreased in all age groups, hip fracture subtypes, and sexes from a mean of 18.5 to 7.2 days. The mean health care costs, over the 2015-2019 period, were lower for men (€17,723) than for women (€23,351) and increased with age to €26,639 in women aged > 80. Annual cumulative costs reached €425M, of which 73% was spent on women. CONCLUSION The total incidence of hip fractures in The Netherlands has increased by 22%. Although incidence in the elderly population is decreasing and HLOS is at an all-time low, the burden of medical costs and crude numbers of proximal femoral fractures are still rising in our aging population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M L Zeelenberg
- Trauma Research Unit Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - D Den Hartog
- Trauma Research Unit Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - S Polinder
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M H J Verhofstad
- Trauma Research Unit Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E M M Van Lieshout
- Trauma Research Unit Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Economic evaluation of operative versus nonoperative treatment of a humeral shaft fracture: economic analyses alongside a multicenter prospective cohort study (HUMMER). Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2022; 49:929-938. [PMID: 36480054 PMCID: PMC10175317 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-022-02160-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Operative treatment of a humeral shaft fracture results in faster recovery than nonoperative treatment. The cost-effectiveness, in terms of costs per Quality-Adjusted Life Year (QALY) gained (Dutch threshold €20,000-€80,000) or minimal important change (MIC) in disability reduced (DASH 6.7), is unknown. The aim of this study was to determine cost-utility and cost-effectiveness of operative versus nonoperative treatment in adults with a humeral shaft fracture type 12A or 12B. METHODS This study was performed alongside a multicenter prospective cohort study. Costs for health care and lost productivity until one year after trauma were calculated. The incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) was reported in costs per QALY (based on the EuroQoL-5D-3L (EQ-5D)) gained. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was reported in costs per MIC (based on the DASH score at three months) reduced. RESULTS Overall, 245 patients were treated operatively and 145 nonoperatively. In the operative group, the mean total costs per patient (€11,925 versus €8793; p < 0.001) and QALYs (0.806 versus 0.778; p < 0.001) were higher. The ICUR of operative treatment was €111,860 per QALY gained (i.e., €3132/0.028). The DASH was 7.3 points (p < 0.001) lower in the operative group. The ICER of operative treatment was €2880 per MIC in disability reduced (i.e., €3132/7.3*6.7). CONCLUSION Due to the limited effect of treatment on quality of life measured with the EQ-5D, the ICUR of operative treatment (€111,860 per QALY gained) exceeds the threshold. However, the incremental costs of €2880 per clinically meaningful difference in DASH are much lower and suggest that operative treatment for a humeral shaft fracture is cost-effective.
Collapse
|
6
|
Talevski J, Sanders KM, Lal A, Watts JJ, Beauchamp A, Duque G, Borgström F, Kanis JA, Svedbom A, Brennan-Olsen SL. A micro-costing analysis of post-fracture care pathways: results from the International Costs and Utilities Related to Osteoporotic Fractures Study (ICUROS). Osteoporos Int 2022; 33:1895-1907. [PMID: 35701629 PMCID: PMC9463215 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-022-06460-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED This study identified the costs and health-related quality of life impacts of several post-fracture multidisciplinary care pathways specific to individual skeletal site (hip, distal forearm, vertebrae, humerus). These care pathways may assist healthcare providers in allocating resources for osteoporotic fractures in more effective and cost-efficient ways. INTRODUCTION This micro-costing study was undertaken to provide the estimated healthcare costs of several fracture site-specific health service use pathways associated with different trajectories of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) 12-months post-fracture. METHODS The study included 4126 adults aged ≥ 50 years with a fragility fracture (1657 hip, 681 vertebrae, 1354 distal forearm, 434 humerus) from the International Costs & Utilities Related to Osteoporotic fractures Study (ICUROS). ICUROS participants were asked to recall the frequency and duration (where applicable) of their health and community care service use at 4- and 12-month follow-up visits. Patient-level costs were identified and aggregated to determine the average cost of healthcare use related to the fracture in each care pathway (presented in Australian 2021 dollars). Mean cost differences were calculated and analysed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc Bonferroni correction to determine any statistically significant differences. RESULTS The total direct cost of fractures was estimated at $89564, $38926, $18333, and $38461AUD per patient for hip, vertebral, wrist, and humeral participants, respectively. A Kruskal-Wallis test yielded a statistically significant difference in cost values between most care pathways (p < 0.001). Of the 20 care pathways, those associated with recovery of HRQoL had lower mean costs per patient across each fracture site. CONCLUSIONS This study identified the costs and HRQoL impacts of several multidisciplinary care pathways for individual fracture sites based on the health service utilization of an international cohort of older adults. These care pathways may assist healthcare providers in allocating resources for fragility fractures in more effective and cost-efficient ways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Talevski
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition Research (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
- Department of Medicine-Western Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
- Australian Institute for Musculoskeletal Science (AIMSS), The University of Melbourne and Western Health, St Albans, VIC, Australia.
- School of Rural Health, Monash University, Warragul, VIC, Australia.
| | - K M Sanders
- Department of Medicine-Western Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Australian Institute for Musculoskeletal Science (AIMSS), The University of Melbourne and Western Health, St Albans, VIC, Australia
- School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - A Lal
- Deakin Health Economics, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
- Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - J J Watts
- School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
- Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - A Beauchamp
- Department of Medicine-Western Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Australian Institute for Musculoskeletal Science (AIMSS), The University of Melbourne and Western Health, St Albans, VIC, Australia
- School of Rural Health, Monash University, Warragul, VIC, Australia
| | - G Duque
- Department of Medicine-Western Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Australian Institute for Musculoskeletal Science (AIMSS), The University of Melbourne and Western Health, St Albans, VIC, Australia
| | - F Borgström
- Quantify Research, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J A Kanis
- Mary McKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - S L Brennan-Olsen
- Department of Medicine-Western Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Australian Institute for Musculoskeletal Science (AIMSS), The University of Melbourne and Western Health, St Albans, VIC, Australia
- School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
- Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Handoll HH, Elliott J, Thillemann TM, Aluko P, Brorson S. Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 6:CD000434. [PMID: 35727196 PMCID: PMC9211385 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd000434.pub5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fractures of the proximal humerus, often termed shoulder fractures, are common injuries, especially in older people. The management of these fractures varies widely, including in the use of surgery. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2001 and last updated in 2015. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects (benefits and harms) of treatment and rehabilitation interventions for proximal humeral fractures in adults. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, trial registries, and bibliographies of trial reports and systematic reviews to September 2020. We updated this search in November 2021, but have not yet incorporated these results. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials that compared non-pharmacological interventions for treating acute proximal humeral fractures in adults. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Pairs of review authors independently selected studies, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. We pooled data where appropriate and used GRADE for assessing the certainty of evidence for each outcome. We prepared a brief economic commentary for one comparison. MAIN RESULTS We included 47 trials (3179 participants, mostly women and mainly aged 60 years or over) that tested one of 26 comparisons. Six comparisons were tested by 2 to 10 trials, the others by small single-centre trials only. Twelve studies evaluated non-surgical treatments, 10 compared surgical with non-surgical treatments, 23 compared two methods of surgery, and two tested timing of mobilisation after surgery. Most trials were at high risk of bias, due mainly to lack of blinding. We summarise the findings for four key comparisons below. Early (usually one week post injury) versus delayed (after three or more weeks) mobilisation for non-surgically-treated fractures Five trials (350 participants) made this comparison; however, the available data are very limited. Due to very low-certainty evidence from single trials, we are uncertain of the findings of better shoulder function at one year in the early mobilisation group, or the findings of little or no between-group difference in function at 3 or 24 months. Likewise, there is very low-certainty evidence of no important between-group difference in quality of life at one year. There was one reported death and five serious shoulder complications (1.9% of 259 participants), spread between the two groups, that would have required substantive treatment. Surgical versus non-surgical treatment Ten trials (717 participants) evaluated surgical intervention for displaced fractures (66% were three- or four-part fractures). There is high-certainty evidence of no clinically important difference between surgical and non-surgical treatment in patient-reported shoulder function at one year (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.07 to 0.27; 7 studies, 552 participants) and two years (SMD 0.06, 95% CI -0.13 to 0.25; 5 studies, 423 participants). There is moderate-certainty evidence of no clinically important between-group difference in patient-reported shoulder function at six months (SMD 0.17, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.38; 3 studies, 347 participants). There is high-certainty evidence of no clinically important between-group difference in quality of life at one year (EQ-5D (0: dead to 1: best quality): mean difference (MD) 0.01, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.04; 6 studies, 502 participants). There is low-certainty evidence of little between-group difference in mortality: one of the 31 deaths was explicitly linked with surgery (risk ratio (RR) 1.35, 95% CI 0.70 to 2.62; 8 studies, 646 participants). There is low-certainty evidence of a higher risk of additional surgery in the surgery group (RR 2.06, 95% CI 1.21 to 3.51; 9 studies, 667 participants). Based on an illustrative risk of 35 subsequent operations per 1000 non-surgically-treated patients, this indicates an extra 38 subsequent operations per 1000 surgically-treated patients (95% CI 8 to 94 more). Although there was low-certainty evidence of a higher overall risk of adverse events after surgery, the 95% CI also includes a slightly increased risk of adverse events after non-surgical treatment (RR 1.46, 95% CI 0.92 to 2.31; 3 studies, 391 participants). Open reduction and internal fixation with a locking plate versus a locking intramedullary nail Four trials (270 participants) evaluated surgical intervention for displaced fractures (63% were two-part fractures). There is low-certainty evidence of no clinically important between-group difference in shoulder function at one year (SMD 0.15, 95% CI -0.12 to 0.41; 4 studies, 227 participants), six months (Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (0 to 100: worst disability): MD -0.39, 95% CI -4.14 to 3.36; 3 studies, 174 participants), or two years (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES) (0 to 100: best outcome): MD 3.06, 95% CI -0.05 to 6.17; 2 studies, 101 participants). There is very low-certainty evidence of no between-group difference in quality of life (1 study), and of little difference in adverse events (4 studies, 250 participants) and additional surgery (3 studies, 193 participants). Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) versus hemiarthroplasty There is very low-certainty evidence from two trials (161 participants with either three- or four-part fractures) of no or minimal between-group differences in self-reported shoulder function at one year (1 study) or at two to three years' follow-up (2 studies); or in quality of life at one year or at two or more years' follow-up (1 study). Function at six months was not reported. Of 10 deaths reported by one trial (99 participants), one appeared to be surgery-related. There is very low-certainty evidence of a lower risk of complications after RTSA (2 studies). Ten people (6.2% of 161 participants) had a reoperation; all eight cases in the hemiarthroplasty group received a RTSA (very low-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There is high- or moderate-certainty evidence that, compared with non-surgical treatment, surgery does not result in a better outcome at one and two years after injury for people with displaced proximal humeral fractures. It may increase the need for subsequent surgery. The evidence is absent or insufficient for people aged under 60 years, high-energy trauma, two-part tuberosity fractures or less common fractures, such as fracture dislocations and articular surface fractures. There is insufficient evidence from randomised trials to inform the choices between different non-surgical, surgical or rehabilitation interventions for these fractures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Hg Handoll
- Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Joanne Elliott
- Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Theis M Thillemann
- Department of Orthopaedics, Shoulder and Elbow Unit, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Patricia Aluko
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Innovation Observatory, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Stig Brorson
- Centre for Evidence-Based Orthopaedics, Zealand University Hospital and Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Prins JTH, Wijffels MME, Wooldrik SM, Panneman MJM, Verhofstad MHJ, Van Lieshout EMM. Trends in incidence rate, health care use, and costs due to rib fractures in the Netherlands. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2021; 48:3601-3612. [PMID: 33846831 PMCID: PMC9532326 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-021-01662-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Accepted: 03/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to examine population-based trends in the incidence rate, health care consumption, and work absence with associated costs in patients with rib fractures. METHODS A retrospective nationwide epidemiologic study was performed with data from patients with one or more rib fractures presented or admitted to a hospital in the Netherlands between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2018 and have been registered in the Dutch Injury Surveillance System (DISS) or the Hospital Discharge Registry (HDR). Incidence rates were calculated using data from Statistics Netherlands. The associated direct health care costs, costs for lost productivity, and years lived with disability (YLD) were calculated using data from a questionnaire. RESULTS In the 4-year study period, a total of 32,124 patients were registered of which 19,885 (61.9%) required hospitalization with a mean duration of 7.7 days. The incidence rate for the total cohort was 47.1 per 100,000 person years and increased with age. The mean associated direct health care costs were €6785 per patient and showed a sharp increase after the age of 75 years. The mean duration of work absence was 44.2 days with associated mean indirect costs for lost productivity of €22,886 per patient. The mean YLD was 0.35 years and decreased with age. CONCLUSION Rib fractures are common and associated with lengthy HLOS and work absenteeism as well as high direct and indirect costs which appear to be similar between patients with one or multiple rib fractures and mostly affected by admitted patients and age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonne T H Prins
- Trauma Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mathieu M E Wijffels
- Trauma Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sophie M Wooldrik
- Trauma Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Michael H J Verhofstad
- Trauma Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther M M Van Lieshout
- Trauma Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hendrickx LAM, Hilgersom NFJ, Alkaduhimi H, Doornberg JN, van den Bekerom MPJ. Radial nerve palsy associated with closed humeral shaft fractures: a systematic review of 1758 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2021; 141:561-568. [PMID: 32285189 PMCID: PMC7966639 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-020-03446-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Humeral shaft fractures are often associated with radial nerve palsy (RNP) (8-16%). The primary aim of this systematic review was to assess the incidence of primary and secondary RNP in closed humeral shaft fractures. The secondary aim was to compare the recovery rate of primary RNP and the incidence of secondary RNP between operative and non-operative treatment. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed in 'Trip Database', 'Embase' and 'PubMed' to identify original studies reporting on RNP in closed humeral shaft fractures. The Coleman Methodology Score was used to grade the quality of the studies. The incidence and recovery of RNP, fracture characteristics and treatment characteristics were extracted. Chi-square and Fisher exact tests were used to compare operative versus non-operative treatment. RESULTS Forty studies reporting on 1758 patients with closed humeral shaft fractures were included. The incidence of primary RNP was 10%. There was no difference in the recovery rate of primary RNP when comparing operative treatment with radial nerve exploration (98%) versus non-operative treatment (91%) (p = 0.29). The incidence of secondary RNP after operative and non-operative treatment was 4% and 0.4%, respectively (p < 0.01). INTERPRETATION One-in-ten patients with a closed humeral shaft fracture has an associated primary RNP, of which > 90% recovers without the need of (re-)intervention. No beneficial effect of early exploration on the recovery of primary RNP could be demonstrated when comparing patients managed non-operatively with those explored early. Patients managed operatively for closed humeral shaft fractures have a higher risk of developing secondary RNP. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV; Systematic Review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurent A. M. Hendrickx
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ,Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre, Flinders University, Adelaide, 5042 Australia
| | - Nick F. J. Hilgersom
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, 1091 Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hassanin Alkaduhimi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, 1091 Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Job N. Doornberg
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ,Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre, Flinders University, Adelaide, 5042 Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Oliver WM, Searle HKC, Ng ZH, Wickramasinghe NRL, Molyneux SG, White TO, Clement ND, Duckworth AD. Fractures of the proximal- and middle-thirds of the humeral shaft should be considered as fragility fractures. Bone Joint J 2020; 102-B:1475-1483. [DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.102b11.bjj-2020-0993.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Aims The aim of this study was to determine the current incidence and epidemiology of humeral diaphyseal fractures. The secondary aim was to explore variation in patient and injury characteristics by fracture location within the humeral diaphysis. Methods Over ten years (2008 to 2017), all adult patients (aged ≥ 16 years) sustaining an acute fracture of the humeral diaphysis managed at the study centre were retrospectively identified from a trauma database. Patient age, sex, medical/social background, injury mechanism, fracture classification, and associated injuries were recorded and analyzed. Results A total of 900 fractures (typical 88.9%, n = 800/900; pathological 8.3%, n = 75/900; periprosthetic 2.8%, n = 25/900) were identified in 898 patients (mean age 57 years (16 to 97), 55.5% (n = 498/898) female). Overall fracture incidence was 12.6/100,000/year. For patients with a typical fracture (n = 798, mean age 56 years (16 to 96), 55.1% (n = 440/798) female), there was a bimodal distribution in men and unimodal distribution in older women (Type G). A fall from standing was the most common injury mechanism (72.6%, n = 581/800). The majority of fractures involved the middle-third of the diaphysis (47.6%, n = 381/800) followed by the proximal- (30.5%, n = 244/800) and distal-thirds (n = 175/800, 21.9%). In all, 18 injuries (2.3%) were open and a radial nerve palsy occurred in 6.7% (n = 53/795). Fractures involving the proximal- and middle-thirds were more likely to occur in older (p < 0.001), female patients (p < 0.001) with comorbidities (p < 0.001) after a fall from standing (p < 0.001). Proximal-third fractures were also more likely to occur in patients with alcohol excess (p = 0.003) and to be classified as AO-Orthopaedic Trauma Association type B or C injuries (p < 0.001). Conclusion This study updates the incidence and epidemiology of humeral diaphyseal fractures. Important differences in patient and injury characteristics were observed based upon fracture location. Injuries involving the proximal- and middle-thirds of the humeral diaphysis should be considered as fragility fractures. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(11):1475–1483.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William M. Oliver
- Edinburgh Orthopaedic Trauma, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Henry K. C. Searle
- Edinburgh Orthopaedic Trauma, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Zhan Herr Ng
- Edinburgh Orthopaedic Trauma, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Samuel G. Molyneux
- Edinburgh Orthopaedic Trauma, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Tim O. White
- Edinburgh Orthopaedic Trauma, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Andrew D. Duckworth
- Edinburgh Orthopaedic Trauma, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Leliveld MS, Polinder S, Panneman MJM, Verhofstad MHJ, Van Lieshout EMM. Epidemiologic trends for isolated tibia shaft fracture admissions in The Netherlands between 1991 and 2012. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2020; 46:1115-1122. [PMID: 30617403 PMCID: PMC7593275 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-018-01072-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2018] [Accepted: 12/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Population-based knowledge on the occurrence of specific injuries is essential for the allocation of health care services, optimization of preventive measures, and research purposes. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine long-term nation-based trends in the incidence rate, trauma mechanism, hospital length of stay (HLOS), treatment, and outcome of hospital-admitted patients with an isolated tibia shaft fracture between 1991 and 2012 in The Netherlands. METHODS All hospital-admitted patients in The Netherlands between 1991 and 2012 with an isolated tibia shaft fracture were included. Age and gender-standardized incidence rates were calculated for each year. Data were extracted from the National Medical Registration. RESULTS The incidence rate for men decreased to 13.8/100,000 person years (py). For women the incidence rate remained stable with 7.2/100,000 py. Incidence showed a peak for adolescent men (15-19 years), and increased in both genders from 65 years onwards. Since 1993 the mean HLOS for isolated tibia fractures reduced from 10.8 to 5.4 days. Mean HLOS increased with age. Mean years lived with disability (YLD) was 4.5 years, declined linearly with age, and showed no gender effect. CONCLUSIONS In 22 years, the incidence rate of hospital admitted patients with an isolated tibia shaft fracture in The Netherlands dropped with 12%, which was mainly attributable to a 15% decline among men. Incidence rate, trauma mechanism, and HLOS were age and gender related. HLOS also reduced over time. Operation rate and YLD were only age related.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mandala S Leliveld
- Trauma Research Unit Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Suzanne Polinder
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Michael H J Verhofstad
- Trauma Research Unit Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther M M Van Lieshout
- Trauma Research Unit Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wu EJ, Zhang SE, Truntzer JN, Gardner MJ, Kamal RN. Cost-Minimization Analysis and Treatment Trends of Surgical and Nonsurgical Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fractures. J Hand Surg Am 2020; 45:698-706. [PMID: 32482497 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.03.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2018] [Revised: 11/20/2019] [Accepted: 03/31/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Recent evidence demonstrated similar outcomes between nonsurgical and surgical management of displaced proximal humerus fractures. We analyzed treatment trends and performed a cost-minimization analysis comparing nonsurgical treatment, open reduction and internal fixation, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, and hemiarthroplasty. We hypothesized that rates of surgical treatment have increased and that the costs associated with surgery are greater compared with nonsurgical management of proximal humerus fractures. METHODS We used a US private-payer claims database of 22 million patient records from 2007 to 2016 to compare (1) cost for the episode of care from the payer perspective between each surgical group and nonsurgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures, and (2) annual trends and complication rates of each group. Cost data, including facility fees, physician fees, physical therapy, and clinic visits, were used to complete a cost-minimization analysis. RESULTS Nonsurgical treatment was associated with lower average total costs compared with surgical intervention. Facility and physician fees accounted for most of this difference. Physical therapy costs and number of physical therapy visits were higher in each surgical group compared with nonsurgical treatment. Surgical treatment was associated with higher complications, revision rates, and length of stay. There was a small but statistically significant decrease in nonsurgical management of proximal humerus fractures between 2007 and 2016. No change was observed in rates of open reduction and internal fixation, whereas rates of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty increased and rates of hemiarthroplasty decreased. CONCLUSIONS Nonsurgical management of proximal humerus fractures decreased during the study period. In the setting of treatment equipoise, cost-minimization analysis favors nonsurgical management of proximal humerus fractures. Surgical management is associated with higher complication rates, revision rates, and length of stay. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Economic Decision Analysis IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward J Wu
- VOICES Health Policy Research Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA
| | - Steven E Zhang
- VOICES Health Policy Research Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA
| | - Jeremy N Truntzer
- VOICES Health Policy Research Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA
| | - Michael J Gardner
- VOICES Health Policy Research Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA
| | - Robin N Kamal
- VOICES Health Policy Research Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Klug A, Gramlich Y, Wincheringer D, Schmidt-Horlohé K, Hoffmann R. Trends in surgical management of proximal humeral fractures in adults: a nationwide study of records in Germany from 2007 to 2016. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2019; 139:1713-1721. [PMID: 31375915 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-019-03252-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Proximal humeral fractures (PHF) are among the most common adult fractures. However, valid epidemiologic population-based data, including differentiation of treatment modalities, are lacking. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using the ICD codes and associated OPS codes for PHF, a retrospective analysis of 2007-2016 Federal Statistical Office of Germany data was performed. Data were evaluated for total incidence of PHF as well as total use, annual utilization rates, age, and sex distributions of all associated surgical procedures. Simple linear regressions were performed to evaluate trends in treatment modalities. RESULTS There were 642,556 cases of PHF. During the study period, incidence changed substantially from 65.2 to 74.2 per 100,000 inhabitants with a significant rise in elderly (> 70 years) patients (P < 0.001). The number of surgical procedures increased by 39%, with locking plate fixation being the most common procedure (48.3%), followed by intramedullary nailing (IMN) (20.0%), hemiarthroplasty (HA) (7.5%), K-wire fixation (6.4%), and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) (5.6%). The utilization rate increased for locking plates, K-wires, and RSA and decreased for HA and IMN. Particularly, the utilization of RSA exhibited a > eightfold increase. Significant linear correlation of procedure and time were found for all surgical treatments. CONCLUSIONS During this period, the number of inpatient PHFs, especially in the elderly, increased. Although locking plate fixation remained the most common treatment method, RSA had the greatest proportional increase over time, supporting its growing popularity in the light of the current scientific evidence. This incline was offset by a corresponding decrease in HA and IMN, which may be related to a growing knowledge of their application limitations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Descriptive epidemiology study, large database analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Klug
- Zentrum für Unfallchirurgie und orthopädische Chirurgie, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Frankfurt am Main, Friedberger Landstrasse 430, 60389, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
| | - Yves Gramlich
- Zentrum für Unfallchirurgie und orthopädische Chirurgie, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Frankfurt am Main, Friedberger Landstrasse 430, 60389, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Dennis Wincheringer
- Zentrum für Unfallchirurgie und orthopädische Chirurgie, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Frankfurt am Main, Friedberger Landstrasse 430, 60389, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Kay Schmidt-Horlohé
- Orthopaedicum Wiesbaden, Praxis für Orthopädie, Unfallchirurgie und Sportmedizin, Zentrum für Ellenbogenchirurgie, Friedrichstrasse 29, 65185, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Reinhard Hoffmann
- Zentrum für Unfallchirurgie und orthopädische Chirurgie, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Frankfurt am Main, Friedberger Landstrasse 430, 60389, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Grgic O, Chung K, Shevroja E, Trajanoska K, Uitterlinden AG, Wolvius EB, Rivadeneira F, Medina-Gomez C. Fractures in school age children in relation to sex and ethnic background: The Generation R Study. Bone 2019; 121:227-231. [PMID: 30677542 DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2019.01.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2018] [Revised: 01/07/2019] [Accepted: 01/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Fracture rate in childhood is increasing and its consequences may affect health and developmental processes and cause school absence and restricted activity days. There are scarce epidemiologic studies regarding fractures in children. The aim of this study was to evaluate if pediatric fractures show disparities across sexes and ethnic groups. This study was conducted based on data from 3632 participants of the Generation R Study. Prevalent fractures were assessed using a questionnaire at a mean age of 9.7 years. Child's ethnicity was determined based on country of birth of the parents using questionnaires (geographic ancestry) or admixture analysis (genetic ancestry). Associations between fracture occurrence and sex or ethnicity were evaluated using logistic regression models adjusted for age, weight, lean mass fraction, bone mineral density (BMD) and sex/ethnicity. Fracture was reported for 525 (14.5%) children. The great majority of these children were classified as European (N = 3164), followed by African (N = 283) and Asian (N = 185) based on geographic ancestry. Similarly, the highest proportion of Europeans was observed based on genetic ancestry. Prevalence of fractures was not different between boys and girls, even after adjustment for possible confounders (OR: 1.03, 95% CI 0.84-1.27, p-value = 0.8). However, odds of prevalent fractures were two times higher in European when compared to Asian children (OR: 2.01, 95% CI 1.17-3.45, p-value = 0.01), and 1.5 times higher when compared to African children (OR: 1.50, 95% CI 1.00-2.26, p-value = 0.05). Overall, in this study, European children showed a highest risk of prevalent fractures independently of factors such as body composition and BMD, while no difference in the prevalence of fractures between boys and girls was observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olja Grgic
- Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Department of Internal Medicine, the Netherlands; Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Department of Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Special Dental Care and Orthodontics, the Netherlands; Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, The Generation R Study, the Netherlands
| | - Kuan Chung
- Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, The Generation R Study, the Netherlands; Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Department of Epidemiology, the Netherlands.
| | - Enisa Shevroja
- Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Department of Internal Medicine, the Netherlands.
| | - Katerina Trajanoska
- Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Department of Internal Medicine, the Netherlands; Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Department of Epidemiology, the Netherlands.
| | - Andre G Uitterlinden
- Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Department of Internal Medicine, the Netherlands; Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, The Generation R Study, the Netherlands; Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Department of Epidemiology, the Netherlands.
| | - Eppo B Wolvius
- Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Department of Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Special Dental Care and Orthodontics, the Netherlands; Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, The Generation R Study, the Netherlands.
| | - Fernando Rivadeneira
- Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Department of Internal Medicine, the Netherlands; Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, The Generation R Study, the Netherlands; Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Department of Epidemiology, the Netherlands.
| | - Carolina Medina-Gomez
- Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Department of Internal Medicine, the Netherlands; Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, The Generation R Study, the Netherlands; Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Department of Epidemiology, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Zarezadeh A, Mamelson K, Thomas WC, Schoch BS, Wright TW, King JJ. Outcomes of distal humerus fractures: What are we measuring? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2018; 104:1253-1258. [PMID: 30352777 DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.08.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2017] [Revised: 08/03/2018] [Accepted: 08/23/2018] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We evaluate the most common outcome measures used in distal humerus fracture studies in order to suggest standardization for future research. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic review identified articles assessing the outcomes of acute distal humerus fractures from 2006 to 2016 from PubMed and Web of Science databases. The inclusion criterion was studies reporting on the outcomes of treatment of acute distal humerus fractures. Review articles, meta-analyses, studies with<5 patients, technique articles, biomechanical studies, and those focusing on one complication/outcome were excluded. Patient demographics and all outcome measures were reviewed. Journal and demographic factors were then compared. RESULTS One-hundred-nine of 2158 articles met inclusion criteria. The median number of fractures per study was 35. Mean patient age was 55.0 years. Average follow-up was 35 months. Range-of-motion and strength measurements were reported in 90% and 17% of studies, respectively. Twenty patient-reported outcome instruments were used. The most commonly reported measures were MEPS, DASH, VAS pain, and Quick DASH scores. An average of 1.9 outcome measures were reported per study. A journal impact factor of≥1.5 was associated with more reported outcome measures. Articles including elbow arthroplasty were associated with higher impact factor journals, more outcome measures, and longer follow-up. Level of evidence was not associated with the number of reported outcome measures. DISCUSSION The current distal humerus fracture literature inconsistently reports outcome measures. More outcome measures were reported in higher impact journals. Future distal humerus fracture studies should include MEPS, DASH or Quick DASH, and VAS Pain scores to allow for appropriate cross-study comparison. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV, Systematic review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Zarezadeh
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Kelly Mamelson
- College of Medicine, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA
| | - W Christian Thomas
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Bradley S Schoch
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Thomas W Wright
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Joseph J King
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Passaretti D, Candela V, Sessa P, Gumina S. Epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures: a detailed survey of 711 patients in a metropolitan area. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2017; 26:2117-2124. [PMID: 28735839 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.05.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2017] [Revised: 05/24/2017] [Accepted: 05/27/2017] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Literature lacks data concerning several epidemiologic aspects of proximal humeral fractures (PHFs). METHODS This retrospective study included 711 consecutive patients (209 men, 502 women) who sustained a PHF in the last 3 years. Participants were divided into 2 groups, adults and children. Data regarding age, sex, date, and fracture side were collected. According to the mechanism of injury, we arbitrarily distinguished 7 subgroups. PHFs were classified according to the head-greater-lesser-shaft (HGLS)-Hertel classification and to the Salter-Harris classification using x-ray and computed tomography imaging. RESULTS PHFs represent 5.03% of the overall fractures. The right side was involved in 389 patients (54.7%; P = .6). The mean age of male and female patients was 55.4 (standard deviation, 21.9) years and 67.0 (standard deviation, 16.1) years, respectively (P = .0001). Significant differences in the trauma mechanism between female patients (street/home low-energy trauma) and male patients (high-energy trauma) were found. A significant correlation between trauma mechanisms from 1 to 5 and fracture patterns H-G-L-S, HL-G-S, HGL-S, and HLS-G was observed. The occurrence of the same patterns significantly varied according to different age subgroups. Considering the pediatric population, a significant incidence of Salter-Harris 2 in both genders was found. No correlation was observed between the fracture patterns and the trauma mechanism. CONCLUSIONS PHFs have a higher prevalence and incidence in females and in older age, respectively; they are more frequent in the winter months. In addition, male fractures are due to different traumatic events than those in females. A correlation between trauma and PHF pattern was evident only for adults. Some fracture patterns are correlated with different ranges of age in all patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele Passaretti
- Shoulder and Elbow Unit, Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic Medicine and Orthopedics Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome-Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy.
| | - Vittorio Candela
- Shoulder and Elbow Unit, Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic Medicine and Orthopedics Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome-Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Pasquale Sessa
- Shoulder and Elbow Unit, Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic Medicine and Orthopedics Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome-Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefano Gumina
- Shoulder and Elbow Unit, Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic Medicine and Orthopedics Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome-Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Delayed union of humeral shaft fractures: comparison of autograft with and without platelet-rich plasma treatment: a randomized, single blinded clinical trial. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2017; 137:1247-1252. [PMID: 28667397 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-017-2736-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite an adequate orthopedic treatment with functional bracing, some patients develop a delayed union in humeral shaft fractures. The objective of the present study was to determine the bone consolidation time among patients with delayed union of diaphyseal humeral fractures who were managed with locking compression plate (LCP) fixation combined with an iliac crest autograft using platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as a co-adjuvant. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study was a controlled, randomized, experimental, longitudinal, comparative, prospective, blind clinical trial. Patients diagnosed with delayed union of a diaphyseal humeral fracture with at least 4 months of evolution were treated with an open reduction and LCP osteosynthesis combined with an iliac crest autograft. The experimental group also received PRP. The patients were assessed radiographically until 36 weeks of evolution. RESULTS A total of 16 patients were included. Both groups had similar demographic characteristics. The patients treated with PRP had an earlier beginning of bone consolidation. Furthermore, these same patients exhibited bone consolidation at 19.9 weeks, on average, in contrast to 25.4 weeks in the control group. CONCLUSIONS The use of PRP promotes earlier bone consolidation in patients with delayed union of the humeral shaft.
Collapse
|
18
|
Klement MR, Nickel BT, Bala A, Penrose CT, Zura RD, Garrigues GE. Glenohumeral arthritis as a risk factor for proximal humerus nonunion. Injury 2016; 47 Suppl 7:S36-S39. [PMID: 28040076 DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1383(16)30852-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proximal humerus fractures are common injuries and nonsurgical treatment has proven to yield good to excellent clinical results. A small percentage of these fractures go on to delayed or nonunion and the incidence and risk factors for this complication are poorly understood. We hypothesize that adjacent joint stiffness of the glenohumeral joint might lead to an increased rate of nonunion for proximal humerus fractures. METHODS A search of the entire Medicare database from 2005 to 2011 was performed to identify 38,754 patients who sustained a proximal humerus fracture including 13,802 with co-existing ipsilateral shoulder osteoarthritis (OA) and 24,952 with co-existing diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A cohort of 301,987 patients served as a control. Medical co-morbidities and fracture complications were compared between the cohorts. RESULTS The incidence of delayed union at 3 and 6 months for OA and RA groups were significantly increased compared to control at 0.79% and 1.74%, and 0.67% and 1.86%, respectively (p < 0.001). Nonunion rates were also significantly increased (p < 0.001) in the OA and RA cohorts at 9 months and 1 year with incidences of 2.39%, 2.89% and 2.59% and 3.08%, Respectively. The incidence of nonunion in the control cohort at the same time points was 1.13% and 1.35%. CONCLUSIONS The coexistence of shoulder OA or a diagnosis of RA nearly doubled in the incidence of proximal humerus nonunion. This is the first study investigating this association in the shoulder and should be considered along with traditional nonunion risk factors in the treatment algorithm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitchell R Klement
- Department of Orthopedics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, United States.
| | - Brian T Nickel
- Department of Orthopedics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, United States
| | - Abiram Bala
- Department of Orthopedics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, United States
| | - Colin T Penrose
- Department of Orthopedics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, United States
| | - Robert D Zura
- Department of Orthopedics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, United States
| | - Grant E Garrigues
- Department of Orthopedics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, United States
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lange M, Brandt D, Mittlmeier T, Gradl G. Proximal humeral fractures: non-operative treatment versus intramedullary nailing in 2-, 3- and 4-part fractures. Injury 2016; 47 Suppl 7:S14-S19. [PMID: 28040071 DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1383(16)30848-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about non-operative treatment of proximal humerus 4-part and severe displaced fractures as those are normally treated operatively. In this study, we present a historical collective of two level I trauma centers, where all humeral head fractures, despite displaced fractures, received non-operative treatment within a 10 years period. Functional and clinical results of 2-, 3- and 4-part fractures were compared to those after fixed angle intramedullary nailing by matched pair analysis. METHODS Between 2000 and 2010, 167 patients with 2-, 3- and 4-part humeral head fractures were treated non-operatively in two level I trauma centers in Rostock. Complete clinical, functional and radiographic follow-up were available for 41 patients in the retrospective analysis. The results were compared by matched-pair analysis to a prospective series of 143 patients treated by antegrade intramedullary nailing using a proximal humeral nail. Of these 143 patients complete radiological and clinical 12 months' follow-up was available for 117 patients. Thus, it was possible to built 41 pairs according to age, gender, and fracture type. Statistical significant differences in constant score (CS), pain, activity of daily living (ADL), range of motion (ROM) and muscle strength were evaluated by Wilcoxon test. Furthermore, x-ray analysis of fracture healing and complications were recorded. RESULTS Operative treatment was not superior to non operative treatment concerning functional results, even in displaced fractures. The only significant difference was found in 3-part-fractures, where better ROM was reached in the non-operative group (p = 0.05). In contrast, there was a tendency toward better activity of daily living (ADL) in intramedullary nailing, but this did not reach statistical significance. X-ray findings revealed better anatomical reconstruction with less valgus and varus displacements after surgery (15% versus 50%, p < 0.005). The complication rate of 37% was higher in the surgery group with a reoperation rate of 32%. CONCLUSION In our study, surgical treatment by fixed angle intramedullary nailing (Targon PH) seems not to be superior to non-operative treatment, regardless of fracture type. In 2-, 3- and 4-part fractures functional and clinical results were similar.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirjam Lange
- Department of Trauma, Orthopedic and Reconstructive Surgery, Munich University Hospital (LMU), Munich, Germany
| | - Daniel Brandt
- Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Rostock, Medical Center, Germany
| | - Thomas Mittlmeier
- Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Rostock, Medical Center, Germany
| | - Georg Gradl
- Department of Trauma, Orthopedic and Reconstructive Surgery, Munich Municipal Hospital Group, Clinic Harlaching, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Proximal humeral fractures with a spiral line of fracture extending from the humeral head to the diaphyseal region are increasing. Treatment for these fractures is comparable to that for shaft fractures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of a new "Long" humeral nail for this type of lesion and identify the best distal locking. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty-three patients treated with a Long Diphos Nail® were selected for this study: main exclusion criteria were poor cognitive and responsive ability to physical therapy, four-part fracture requiring humeral head replacement, an isolated greater or lesser tubercle fracture and a head-splitting fracture. All patients were divided into two groups according to the distal locking (single or double) and clinically evaluated at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery. The following parameters were evaluated: fracture healing on radiographic images every month; level of pain with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS); recovery of shoulder function or ability to resume normal daily activities according to the Constant Scoring System (CSS); patient satisfaction; and complications, like fracture consolidation defect or delay. A statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS Improvements in pain, satisfaction and shoulder functional recovery were recorded. Patients reached fracture healing in two to six months. The mean healing time was better for double distal locking (p=0.04).There was a clinically greater difference (p=0.006) between the groups for the mean Constant score at 3 months follow-up, with better results for the double distal locking group. Complications were: one patient with a consolidation delay with a single distal locking screw breakage; it was necessary to remove the nail and perform a second treatment. CONCLUSIONS The results of the study indicate the efficacy of Long Diphos Nail® in the treatment of fractures with a line of fracture extending to the proximal diaphyseal region. The features of a multiplane stabilisation above the fracture and a distal double locking may represent the key for a good fixation for 11-A2, A3 or B2 fractures with a long spiral line. A double distal locking reduces fracture micro-instability and so patients recover function and strength quicker because of less pain at the fracture site. STUDY DESIGN retrospective, cohort of cases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV.
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
Necrosis of the humeral head, infections and non-unions are among the most dangerous and difficult-to-treat complications of proximal humeral fractures. The aim of this work was to analyse in detail non-unions and post-traumatic bone defects and to suggest an algorithm of care. Treatment options are based not only on the radiological frame, but also according to a detailed analysis of the patient, who is classified using a risk factor analysis. This method enables the surgeon to choose the most suitable treatment for the patient, thereby facilitating return of function in the shortest possible time. The treatment of such serious complications requires the surgeon to be knowledgeable about the following possible solutions: increased mechanical stability; biological stimulation; and reconstructive techniques in two steps, with application of biotechnologies and prosthetic substitution.
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fracture of the proximal humerus, often termed shoulder fracture, is a common injury in older people. The management of these fractures varies widely. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2001 and last updated in 2012. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects (benefits and harms) of treatment and rehabilitation interventions for proximal humeral fractures in adults. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and other databases, conference proceedings and bibliographies of trial reports. The full search ended in November 2014. SELECTION CRITERIA We considered all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomised controlled trials pertinent to the management of proximal humeral fractures in adults. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Both review authors performed independent study selection, risk of bias assessment and data extraction. Only limited meta-analysis was performed. MAIN RESULTS We included 31 heterogeneous RCTs (1941 participants). Most of the 18 separate treatment comparisons were tested by small single-centre trials. The main exception was the surgical versus non-surgical treatment comparison tested by eight trials. Except for a large multicentre trial, bias in these trials could not be ruled out. The quality of the evidence was either low or very low for all comparisons except the largest comparison.Nine trials evaluated non-surgical treatment in mainly minimally displaced fractures. Four trials compared early (usually one week) versus delayed (three or four weeks) mobilisation after fracture but only limited pooling was possible and most of the data were from one trial (86 participants). This found some evidence that early mobilisation resulted in better recovery and less pain in people with mainly minimally displaced fractures. There was evidence of little difference between the two groups in shoulder complications (2/127 early mobilisation versus 3/132 delayed mobilisation; 4 trials) and fracture displacement and non-union (2/52 versus 1/54; 2 trials).One quasi-randomised trial (28 participants) found the Gilchrist-type sling was generally more comfortable than the Desault-type sling (body bandage). One trial (48 participants) testing pulsed electromagnetic high-frequency energy provided no evidence. Two trials (62 participants) provided evidence indicating little difference in outcome between instruction for home exercises versus supervised physiotherapy. One trial (48 participants) reported, without presentable data, that home exercise alone gave better early and comparable long-term results than supervised exercise in a swimming pool plus home exercise.Eight trials, involving 567 older participants, evaluated surgical intervention for displaced fractures. There was high quality evidence of no clinically important difference in patient-reported shoulder and upper-limb function at one- or two-year follow-up between surgical (primarily locking plate fixation or hemiarthroplasty) and non-surgical treatment (sling immobilisation) for the majority of displaced proximal humeral fractures; and moderate quality evidence of no clinically important difference between the two groups in quality of life at two years (and at interim follow-ups at six and 12 months). There was moderate quality evidence of little difference between groups in mortality in the surgery group (17/248 versus 12/248; risk ratio (RR) 1.40 favouring non-surgical treatment, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69 to 2.83; P = 0.35; 6 trials); only one death was explicitly linked with the treatment. There was moderate quality evidence of a higher risk of additional surgery in the surgery group (34/262 versus 16/261; RR 2.06, 95% CI 1.18 to 3.60; P = 0.01; 7 trials). Although there was moderate evidence of a higher risk of adverse events after surgery, the 95% confidence intervals for adverse events also included the potential for a greater risk of adverse events after non-surgical treatment.Different methods of surgical management were tested in 12 trials. One trial (57 participants) comparing two types of locking plate versus a locking nail for treating two-part surgical neck fractures found some evidence of slightly better function after plate fixation but also of a higher rate of surgically-related complications. One trial (61 participants) comparing a locking plate versus minimally invasive fixation with distally inserted intramedullary K-wires found little difference between the two implants at two years. Compared with hemiarthroplasty, one trial (32 participants) found similar results with locking plate fixation in function and re-operation rates, whereas another trial (30 participants) reported all five re-operations occurred in the tension-band fixation group. One trial (62 participants) found better patient-rated (Quick DASH) and composite shoulder function scores at a minimum of two years follow-up and a lower incidence of re-operation and complications after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) compared with hemiarthroplasty.No important between-group differences were found in one trial (120 participants) comparing the deltoid-split approach versus deltopectoral approach for non-contact bridging plate fixation, and two trials (180 participants) comparing 'polyaxial' and 'monaxial' screws in locking plate fixation. One trial (68 participants) produced some preliminary evidence that tended to support the use of medial support locking screws in locking plate fixation. One trial (54 participants) found fewer adverse events, including re-operations, for the newer of two types of intramedullary nail. One trial (35 participants) found better functional results for one of two types of hemiarthroplasty. One trial (45 participants) found no important effects of tenodesis of the long head of the biceps for people undergoing hemiarthroplasty.Very limited evidence suggested similar outcomes from early versus later mobilisation after either surgical fixation (one trial: 64 participants) or hemiarthroplasty (one trial: 49 participants). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There is high or moderate quality evidence that, compared with non-surgical treatment, surgery does not result in a better outcome at one and two years after injury for people with displaced proximal humeral fractures involving the humeral neck and is likely to result in a greater need for subsequent surgery. The evidence does not cover the treatment of two-part tuberosity fractures, fractures in young people, high energy trauma, nor the less common fractures such as fracture dislocations and head splitting fractures.There is insufficient evidence from RCTs to inform the choices between different non-surgical, surgical, or rehabilitation interventions for these fractures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen H G Handoll
- Health and Social Care Institute, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, Tees Valley, UK, TS1 3BA
| | | |
Collapse
|