A mini-invasive technique for severe arthrofibrosis of the knee: A technical note

Old but gold: Is the Judet procedure still a viable option for posttraumatic knee stiffness in 2024? A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Posttraumatic extension contracture of the knee (PECK) is common after knee injury. Initial management is conservative to improve the range of motion; if it fails, surgery may be necessary. This systematic review analyses existing literature on Judet quadricepsplasty for PECK. We will assess clinical outcomes, complications, patient satisfaction and factors that may influence its success.

Methods

A search was conducted on 25 November 2023, adhering to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines. PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar were used. Search strings were ([Judet] OR [quadricepsplasty]) AND (knee) AND (stiffness) and ([Judet] OR [quadricepsplasty]) AND (knee). Inclusion criteria: English articles focused on PECK, published between 2003 and 2023, and a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Exclusion criteria: case reports, alternative techniques, knee stiffness cases not only due to trauma, a sample size of <10 patients and articles not reporting functional outcomes.

Results

Among selected studies, 239 patients were considered. The average time between injury and Judet was 27 months. The population was predominantly male; the mean follow-up was 33 months. An average intraoperative knee range of motion improvement of 79.1 degrees (confidence interval 76.9; 81.3) compared to the average preoperative starting value of 30.7 degrees was observed. This improvement decreased by 13.5 degrees at the first postoperative check and by an additional 2.4 degrees at the follow-up, while maintaining an average value of bending above 90 degrees.

Conclusion

Judet quadricepsplasty appears an effective technique for the management of PECK. The heterogeneity of included studies and the absence of standardized outcome measures limit the ability to draw definitive conclusions.

Level of Evidence

Level III.

Patellar Base Support Technique During Manipulation Under Anesthesia for Knee Arthrofibrosis Limits the Risk of Iatrogenic Complications

Knee extension contracture is a common postinjury and postsurgical complication, which decreases knee joint flexion. Many techniques have been described in the literature to restore knee flexion, with the most common one being an arthroscopic lysis of adhesions. However, in severe cases, additional intra- and extra-articular procedures are needed to restore full knee flexion. Manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) is one of them. Unfortunately, it may lead to devastating complications, such as iatrogenic rupture of the patellar tendon or fractures of the patella or tibial tuberosity. Therefore, the purpose of this report is to present a safer modification of MUA for knee extension contracture in cases in which excessive force is demanded to achieve flexion. The key aim of the "patellar base support" technique (PBS technique) is to stretch the contracted quadriceps muscle with controlled and decreased tension on the patella, patellar tendon, and tibial tuberosity.

Complications of the surgical treatment of fractures of the tibial plateau: prevalence, causes, and management

Open reduction and internal fixation is the gold standard treatment for tibial plateau fractures. However, the procedure is not free of complications such as knee stiffness, acute infection, chronic infection (osteomyelitis), malunion, non-union, and post-traumatic osteoarthritis. The treatment options for knee stiffness are mobilisation under anaesthesia (MUA) when the duration is less than 3 months, arthroscopic release when the duration is between 3 and 6 months, and open release for refractory cases or cases lasting more than 6 months. Early arthroscopic release can be associated with MUA. Regarding treatment of acute infection, if the fracture has healed, the hardware can be removed, and lavage and debridement can be performed along with antibiotic therapy. If the fracture has not healed, the hardware is retained, and lavage, debridement, and antibiotic therapy are performed (sometimes more than once until the fracture heals). Fracture stability is important not only for healing but also for resolving the infection. In cases of osteomyelitis, treatment should be performed in stages: aggressive debridement of devitalised tissue and bone, antibiotic spacing and temporary external fixation until the infection is resolved (first stage), followed by definitive surgery with grafting or soft tissue coverage depending on the bone defect (second stage). Intra-articular or extra-articular osteotomy is a good option to correct malunion in young, active patients without significant joint damage. When malunion is associated with extensive joint involvement or the initial cartilage damage has resulted in knee osteoarthritis, the surgical option is total knee arthroplasty.

Etiopathology and Management of Stiff Knees: A Current Concept Review

BACKGROUND

Knee stiffness after trauma, fracture fixation, arthroscopic surgery, infection, and knee arthroplasty is a known complication, which is challenging to manage and causes significant disability to the patients.

METHODS

We did a comprehensive search on the stiff knees, in the last week of May 2020, from the search engines of PubMed, SCOPUS, Google Scholar, and Research Gates using the appropriate keywords.

RESULTS

We found two types of articles related to knees stiffness: (a) following trauma, internal and external fixation of fractures and arthroscopic surgery, and (b) following total knee arthroplasty. Arthroscopic surgery was found to be a favored mode of management of stiff knees in both of the above groups. The Manipulation under Anesthesia (MUA) was also found effective if done carefully and in the early course of the stiffness.

CONCLUSION

Knee stiffness due to any cause is a trouble proposition to both patients and treating surgeons. Various methods of management have been described to deal with knee stiffness. Amongst the operative treatment, MUA and arthroscopic surgery were found to be the most effective. Arthroscopic surgery offers a good option of release stiff knees in the majority of cases, and it is most valuable and effective if done earlier in the course of the stiffness (preferably between 3 and 6 months).

Arthrofibrosis After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management

Arthrofibrosis is the pathologic stiffening of a joint caused by an exaggerated inflammatory response. As a common complication following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), this benign-appearing connective tissue hyperplasia can cause significant disability among patients because the concomitant knee pain and restricted range of motion severely hinder postoperative rehabilitation, clinical outcomes, and basic activities of daily living. The most effective management for arthrofibrosis in the setting of TKA is prevention, including preoperative patient education programs, aggressive postoperative physical therapy regimens, and anti-inflammatory medications. Operative treatments include manipulation under anesthesia, arthroscopic debridement, and quadricepsplasty.

All-arthroscopic release for treating severe knee extension contractures could improve the knee range of motion and the mid-term functional outcomes

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety, feasibility, and effectiveness of an all-arthroscopic technique for the intra- and extraarticular release of severe knee extension contractures.

METHODS

From 2012 to 2016, 25 patients with severe knee extension contractures (less than 45° range of flexion) were treated with an all-arthroscopic release technique. The patients underwent intra- and extraarticular arthroscopic release and arthroscopic-assisted mini-incision quadriceps plasty. The post-operative rehabilitation was initiated the first day after the procedures. Comprehensive clinical follow-up evaluations including the range-of-motion (ROM) assessment, the Lysholm score, and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score were performed on all patients.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 28 months (range 12-65 months). The ROM improved from 23.9° ± 7.5° pre-operatively to 105.9° ± 6.5° at the final follow-up (P < 0.001). In addition, the Lysholm score increased from 59.9 ± 5.2 pre-operatively to 89.7 ± 3.3 (P < 0.001). The IKDC score increased from 47.6 ± 3.4 pre-operatively to 91.7 ± 2.4 (P < 0.001). All patients were satisfied with their final ROM and functional outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The all-arthroscopic release technique was a safe, feasible and effective method for treating severe knee extension contractures. The severe knee extension contractures may be successfully addressed by the all-arthroscopic release technique during our clinical practice.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

The Anatomy of the Articularis Genus Muscle and Its Relation to the Extensor Apparatus of the Knee

Background:

The anatomy of the articularis genus muscle has prompted speculation that it elevates the suprapatellar bursa during extension of the knee joint. However, its architectural parameters indicate that this muscle is not capable of generating enough force to fulfill this function. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the anatomy of the articularis genus, with special emphasis on its relationship with the adjacent vastus intermedius and vastus medialis muscles.

Methods:

The articularis genus muscle was investigated in 18 human cadaveric lower limbs with use of macrodissection techniques. All components of the quadriceps muscle group were traced from origin to insertion, and their affiliations were determined. Six limbs were cut transversely in the middle third of the thigh. The modes of origin and insertion of the articularis genus, its nerve supply, and its connections with the vastus intermedius and vastus medialis were studied.

Results:

The muscle bundles of the articularis genus were organized into 3 main layers: superficial, intermediate, and deep. The bundles of the superficial layer and, in 60% of the specimens, the bundles of the intermediate layer originated from both the vastus intermedius and the anterior and anterolateral surfaces of the femur. The bundles of the deep layer and, in 40% of the specimens, the bundles of the intermediate layer arose solely from the anterior surface of the femur. The distal insertion sites included different levels of the suprapatellar bursa and the joint capsule. A number of connections between the articularis genus and the vastus intermedius were found. While the vastus medialis inserted into the whole length of the vastus intermedius aponeurosis, it included muscle fibers of the articularis genus, building an intricate muscle system supplied by nerve branches of the same medial deep division of the femoral nerve.

Conclusions:

The articularis genus, vastus medialis, and vastus intermedius have a complex, interacting architecture, suggesting that the articularis genus most likely does not act as an independent muscle. With support of the vastus intermedius and vastus medialis, the articularis genus might be able to function as a retractor of the suprapatellar bursa. The finding of likely interplay between the articularis genus, vastus intermedius, and vastus medialis is supported by their concurrent innervation.

Clinical Relevance:

The association between the articularis genus, vastus medialis, and vastus intermedius may be more complex than previously believed, and this close anatomical connection could have functional implications for knee surgery. Dysfunction, scarring, or postoperative arthrofibrosis of the sophisticated interactive mechanism needs further investigation.