Standardised virtual fracture clinic management of radiographically stable Weber B ankle fractures is safe, cost effective and reproducible

Outcomes of a Novel Spine Virtual Fracture Clinic in an Australian Tertiary Hospital

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the proportion of referrals diverted by the spine virtual fracture clinic (SVFC) from traditional outpatient clinic management.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The consistent rise in demand for orthopedic outpatient clinic services is creating marked challenges to the provision of quality care. Virtual fracture clinics for upper and lower limb fractures have reduced the burden on outpatient clinics by providing an alternative telehealth management pathway. To date, no study describes the expansion of virtual care to the spine trauma population.

METHODS

A study of spine fractures referred to the RMH Department of Orthopaedic Surgery was conducted comparing outcomes before (January to December 2021) and following (July 2022 to November 2023) implementation of an SVFC. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a telephone-based SVFC on outpatient clinic activity, represented by the proportion of referrals discharged without requiring an outpatient clinic appointment. Secondary aims included appointment utilization, lost to follow-up rates, duration of care, missed or misdiagnoses, unplanned operations, and complications.

RESULTS

Of the 731 referrals managed by the SVFC, 91.1% were discharged without requiring in-person outpatient clinic attendance. Compared with the outpatient clinic historical cohort (150 referrals), SVFC management was associated with reductions in the average number of consultations per referral (1.8 vs . 2.4, P <0.001), appointments not attended (5% vs . 13%, P <0.001), referrals lost to follow-up (0% vs . 10.7%, P <0.001), and a shorter duration of care (median 48 vs . 58 d, P <0.001). A total of 65 patients (8.1%) were redirected to the outpatient clinic, of which three underwent surgical intervention. No diagnostic errors, complications or adverse events were identified.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that an SVFC is an effective and safe alternative pathway to traditional hospital-based outpatient clinics, ith low-risk for any adverse outcomes.

Trauma Assessment Clinic: A virtual fracture clinic model that delivers on its PROMise!

BACKGROUND

The use of virtual fracture clinics across the United Kingdom and Ireland is growing and have been shown in an increasing number of studies to be safe, cost-effective and associated with good functional outcomes and patient satisfaction rates for certain fracture types. Initially pioneered at Glasgow Royal Infirmary, many centres have adopted similar templates, or variations of, and the overall aim of this study was to assess functional outcomes and injury recovery satisfaction rates of patients discharged directly following review in a specific virtual fracture clinic model known as the Trauma Assessment Clinic (TAC).

METHODS

A prospective observational study was carried out of paediatric (aged <17 years) and adult (aged >17 years) patients, with the five most commonly observed fracture types, who were discharged directly following review at the TAC in a single hospital centre over a 12 month period from January to December 2018. Primary and secondary outcomes were assessed via telephone administered questionnaires and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs).

RESULTS

A total of 198 patients were included in the study (n = 98 paediatric and n = 100 adult). Overall, 192 (97%) patients or parents/guardians of patients stated that they either strongly agreed (n = 148, 74.9%) or agreed (n = 44, 22.1%) that they were satisfied with their own or their child's recovery from their injury at a median follow-up of 9 months post direct discharge from the TAC. Adult patients had an EQ-5D-5L index median value of 1 (range 0-1), an EQ-VAS median of 87 (range 0-100), a QuickDASH median score of 0 (range 0-100) and a median LEFS of 80 (range 0-80).

CONCLUSION

The virtual management of trauma patients via the TAC model is a safe and patient-centred approach to treating certain injuries and fracture patterns. This study reports excellent patient reported outcome measures and patient injury recovery satisfaction rates. The use of current available technology in tandem with up-to-date best clinical practice and guidelines play a central role in this novel care pathway.

Efficiency of a virtual fracture care protocol in non-operative treatment of adult patients with a distal radial fracture

This study aimed to determine the effects of virtual fracture care (VFC) on secondary healthcare utilization in non-operative treatment of adult patients with a distal radial fracture. A retrospective cohort study was performed, including those who received non-operative treatment without VFC (pre-VFC) and with VFC (VFC). Outcomes included secondary healthcare utilization, calculated treatment costs, emergency department (ED) reattendances and complication rates. In total, 88 pre-VFC and 99 VFC patients were included. Pre-VFC patients had more follow-up appointments, with a median of 4 (IQR: 3) versus a median of 4 (IQR: 1) in VFC patients. In addition, 3% of follow-up appointments for pre-VFC patients were performed remotely compared to 18% for VFC patients. Complications and ED reattendances were comparable between groups. In this study, non-operative treatment of adult patients with a distal radial fracture through VFC reduced secondary healthcare utilization, with similar reported complication and ED reattendance rates compared with treatment without VFC.Level of evidence: III.

Letter-only discharge process for virtual fracture clinic, a safe alternative to telephone discharge, outcomes and 12 month follow up for 1140 patients

Telephone consult has become the accepted discharge method for virtual fracture clinic (VFC) within the United Kingdom. Telephone consultations are time consuming; many orthopaedic units lack the resources and staff to deliver large numbers of daily telephone consultations which may block the development of an effective VFC. Our study aim was to validate a letter only VFC discharge process for safety and efficacy. A letter only discharge VFC was instigated in response to the COVID-19 pandemic (April 2020). No ethical approval was required, the protocol was designed as a phased service evaluation and improvement project after change in practice. After smaller pilot audits, a comprehensive review of discharges outcomes from the VFC August-September 2021 (Phase 1) and January-March 2022 (Phase 2) was completed. Electronic letters, AE (accident and emergency) attendances and PACS database images (radiography and scans) taken over a 12 month follow up were analysed for failed discharges and adverse outcomes. Of 4810 patients reviewed in VFC, 1140 were discharged (24%). Mean patient age; 35 years (range 2-98), two thirds of patients were adults (>16 years). 116 (10%) returned with symptoms related to their initial presentation usually within the first few weeks via contact with the VFC helpline. Of the returning patients 65 were discharged again with the same advice, 48 underwent further imaging (CT/ MRI/ US scanning). 6 patients (0.5%) underwent surgery for problems relating to the initial injury; 2 knee meniscal repair/debridement, 1 ACL reconstruction, 1 fixation fifth metatarsal non-union, 2 shoulder arthroscopy. All surgeries were performed on elective timescales between 4 and 12 months after injury. Discharging letters detailed rehabilitation and symptom resolution timeframes. Our approach did not result in high return rates or adverse events (unexpected operations) in comparison to published traditional telephone discharge VFC. Units with limited staffing resources wishing to implement a VFC could safely adopt this approach as an alternative to telephone discharge.

Cast versus removable orthosis for the management of stable type B ankle fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

There is currently no consensus on nonoperative management in adult patients after a stable type B ankle fracture. The aim of this review is to compare a removable orthosis versus a cast regarding safety and functional outcome in the NOM of stable type B ankle fractures.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed using randomized clinical trials and observational studies. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed with the methodological index for non-randomized studies instrument. Nonoperative management was compared using the number of complications and functional outcome measured using the Olerud and Molander Score (OMAS) or the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Ankle Score.

RESULTS

Five studies were included. Two were randomized clinical trials, and three were observational studies, including a total of 516 patients. A meta-analysis showed statistically significant higher odds of developing complications in the cast group [odds ratio (OR), 4.67 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.52-14.35)]. Functional outcome in OMAS did not vary significantly at 6 weeks, mean difference (MD) - 6.64 (95% CI - 13.72 to + 0.45), and at 12 weeks, MD - 6.91 (95% CI - 18.73 to + 4.91). The mean difference of functional outcome in OMAS at 26 weeks or longer was significantly better in the removable orthosis group; MD - 2.63 (95% CI - 5.01 to - 0.25).

CONCLUSION

Results of this systematic review and meta-analysis show that a removable orthosis is a safe alternative type of NOM, as complication numbers are significantly lower in the orthosis group. In addition, no statistically significant differences were found in terms of functional outcome between a removable orthosis and a cast at 6 and 12 weeks. The 6-week and the 26-week OMAS results show that in patients with stable type B ankle fractures, a removable orthosis is non-inferior to a cast in terms of functional outcome.

Virtual Fracture Clinic Model in India: A Technological Innovation

Background

Virtual Fracture Clinics (VFCs) are an alternative to the conventional model of fracture and minor injuries care. It is a new, evolving service designed to speed up patient access to orthopaedic care introduced in the United Kingdom in 2011 and has been increasingly used in the management of certain musculoskeletal injuries.

Methods

This observational, pilot study evaluates the possibility of combining telemedicine technology and a virtual fracture clinical assessment pathway to remotely assess patients supported by radiology imaging in India.

Results

Piloting and developing a virtual fracture clinical assessment pathway model in India is faced with many challenges including regulations, internet, and data connectivity issues, and concerns of medico-legal implications.

Conclusion

Recent studies have reported Virtual Fracture Clinics (VFCs) to be able to provide a safe, cost-effective model of patient care in a subset of musculoskeletal injuries. Limitations and shortcomings of Virtual Fracture Clinics (VFCs) in India can be mitigated with effective communication, enhanced documentation, appropriate training, and information governance. This pathway is not a replacement for conventional 'face-to-face' evaluation but a credible option to complement the delivery of trauma and orthopaedic care in the future in India.

Surgeon preferences are associated with utilization of telehealth in fracture care

BACKGROUND

The SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic has the potential to evoke lasting changes in the delivery of care, and the utilization of telehealth. We sought associations between surgeon personal factors and greater use of telehealth to treat fractures relative to in-person care.

METHODS

Seventy-five fracture surgeons participated in a survey-based experiment. All surgeons were asked about their preferences regarding remote compared to in-person communication. Participants rated the following items on slider scales: their degree of introversion, the importance of a hands-on/physical exam and surgeon preferences regarding telehealth. We identified factors associated with the use of, and comfort with, telehealth.

RESULTS

The use of telehealth during the pandemic was associated with comfort evaluating wounds via telehealth. A greater proportion of remote visits was associated with comfort evaluating wounds and confidence teaching exercises via telehealth. There was consensus that telehealth did not alter utilization rates of radiographs or offer of discretionary surgery. The use of absorbable sutures to limit in-person visits was associated with a preference for working from home and greater comfort with evaluating wounds remotely. The use of 2- and 6-week post-operative telehealth visits and plans to use telehealth after the pandemic (52%) were associated with greater comfort in evaluating wounds through telehealth and greater confidence with video instruction of exercises.

CONCLUSIONS

The finding that personal factors are associated with utilization of telehealth helps target strategies for increased use of telehealth and other technologies as the pandemic wanes. Given that telehealth adds convenience for people with ambulatory difficulties or in remote areas, such efforts are warranted.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Not applicable.

Weber Ankle Fracture Classification System Yields Greatest Interobserver and Intraobserver Reliability Over AO/OTA and Lauge-Hansen Classification Systems Under Time Constraints in an Asian Population

No previous studies have evaluated the intra- and interobserver reliability between the Weber, Lauge-Hansen and AO Foundation/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification systems under time constraints. This study compares the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the aforementioned classification systems under simulated time constraints. Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of ankle malleolar fractures from 80 consecutive patients from 2015 to 2016 were classified by 2 independent observers according to Weber, Lauge-Hansen and AO/OTA. Classifications were conducted over 4 successive weeks under timed (25-seconds) and untimed conditions, with 1-week gaps between each classification. Cohen's kappa and percentage agreement were calculated. Cohen's kappa for interobserver agreement ranged 0.67 to 0.67 and 0.59 to 0.73 for untimed and timed classifications for Weber; 0.38 to 0.47 and 0.44 to 0.50 for Lauge-Hansen; 0.28 to 0.49 and 0.13 to 0.37 for AO/OTA. Intraobserver agreement ranged from 0.83 to 0.85 and 0.78 to 0.79 for untimed and timed classifications for Weber; 0.46 to 0.65 and 0.59 to 0.73 for Lauge-Hansen; 0.42 to 0.63 and 0.40 to 0.51 for AO/OTA. Based on the Landis and Koch's benchmark scale, there was substantial agreement in the inter- and intraobserver variables for Weber; moderate agreement in inter- and intraobserver variables for Lauge-Hansen; fair and moderate agreement in inter- and intraobserver variables respectively for AO/OTA. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability was the most substantial for Weber, followed by Lauge-Hansen and AO/OTA. Time constraint did not have a statistically significant effect on the reliability of classifications. We recommend concurrent usage of the Weber and Lauge-Hansen system, since they demonstrate the greatest reliability and reproducibility, and confer better understanding of the fracture type, respectively.

Orthopedic Telemedicine Outpatient Practice Diagnoses Set during the First COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown-Individual Observation

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused a substantial intensification of the telemedicine transformation process in orthopedics since 2020. In the light of the legal regulations introduced in Poland, from the beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, physicians, including orthopedic surgeons, have had the opportunity to conduct specialist teleconsultations. Teleconsultations increase epidemiological safety and significantly reduce the exposure of patients and medical staff to direct transmission of the viral vector and the spread of infections. The study aimed to describe diagnoses and clinical aspects of consecutive orthopedic teleconsultations (TC) during the pandemic lockdown. The diagnoses were set according to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10). Hybrid teleconsultations used smartphones and obligatory Electronic Health Record (EHR) with supplemental voice, SMS, MMS, Medical images, documents, and video conferencing if necessary. One hundred ninety-eight consecutive orthopedic teleconsultations were served for 615 women and 683 men (mean age 41.82 years ± 11.47 years). The most frequently diagnosed diseases were non-acute orthopedic disorders "M" (65.3%) and injuries "S" (26.3%). Back pain (M54) was the most frequent diagnosis (25.5%). Although virtual orthopedic consultation cannot replace an entire personal visit to a specialist orthopedic surgeon, in many cases, teleconsultation enables medical staff to continue to participate in providing medical services at a sufficiently high medical level to ensure patient and physician. The unified approach to TC diagnoses using ICD-10 or ICD-11 may improve further research on telemedicine-related orthopedics repeatability. Future research directions should address orthopedic teleconsultations' practical aspects and highlight legal, organizational, and technological issues with their implementations.

The introduction of the trauma triage clinic at a district general hospital: safety and efficacy during the first year of implementation

INTRODUCTION

Previously published work has shown that there are no missed injuries following the introduction of a trauma triage clinic (TTC). This study aimed to assess both the safety and efficacy of the TTC model in a district general hospital in the United Kingdom. We aimed to assess the rate of missed 'high-risk' injuries, including posterior shoulder dislocations, talar injuries, Lisfranc injuries and complex carpal instability.

METHODS

Data were collected retrospectively between November 2017 and October 2018 (inclusive). During this time, 3,721 patients were reviewed (mean age 38 years, SD 25.5, range 1-103 years). Case notes and x-rays were reviewed for all patients. Compliance was assessed against British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma (BOAST 7) guidelines for fracture clinic services. The standard for adherence to guidelines was 100%.

RESULTS

Thirty-two of 3,721 patients had a missed injury during the study period, and 66% of these injuries were high risk. TTC was effective in reducing the number of patients seen in the fracture clinic, with 23% of patients discharged directly from the TTC. Eighty-nine per cent of patients were reviewed in clinic within 72 hours of presentation, with a median time to review of 2 days.

CONCLUSION

This study has shown that TTC is efficient in reducing the burden of patients seen in the fracture clinic, but it is not as safe as reported previously. Although the prevalence of missed injuries is low, hospitals introducing a TTC model should consider departmental processes to help accurately identify and triage high-risk injuries.

Virtual fracture clinic reduces patient X-ray volume for common wrist and ankle fractures

Background

Virtual fracture clinics (VFC) have been widely adopted worldwide as part of the changes in healthcare delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic. They have been shown to be a safe and effective method of delivering trauma care for injuries which do not require immediate intervention or specialist management, whilst maintaining high levels of patient satisfaction.

Aims

Our aim was to evaluate whether VFCs reduce the volume of X-rays performed for common fractures of the wrist and ankle.

Methods

A retrospective cohort review was performed. The pre-VFC group consisted of 168 wrist and 108 ankle referrals from March to September 2019. The VFC group included 75 wrist and 68 ankle referrals, during the period March to September 2020. The total number of X-ray images, carried out within a 3-month period for each fracture was summated, with statistical analysis performed following fracture pattern classification.

Findings

A statistically significant decrease in mean X-rays was observed for isolated stable fracture patterns, such as non-displaced distal radius, − 0.976 (p = 0.00025), and Weber A ankle fractures, − 0.907 (p = 0.000013). A reduction was also observed for more complex fracture patterns such as dorsally displaced distal radius, − 0.701 (p = 0.129) and Weber B ankle fractures, − 0.786 (p = 0.235), though not achieving statistical significance.

Conclusions

Virtual fracture clinics can reduce X-ray frequency for common stable wrist and ankle fractures, with resultant benefits for both patients and healthcare systems. These benefits may be sustained in patient care beyond the current COVID-19 pandemic.

The Use of Telehealth for Orthopedic Consultations and Assessments: A Systematic Review

As a result of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, tele-health for orthopedic care is expanding rapidly. The authors sought to identify the evidence describing the effectiveness, barriers, and clinical applications of telehealth for orthopedic assessments and consultations. MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to March 2020. Forty-seven studies were included, with the most common conditions evaluated being trauma related and the primary modality being videoconferencing. Available literature supports the use of telehealth for orthopedic consultations and assessments because it yields moderate-to-high patient and provider satisfaction, accurate examinations, cost-effectiveness, and reduced wait times. Most commonly reported concerns were professional liability, network security, and technical issues. Given the COVID-19 pandemic, rapid implementation and uptake of virtual assessment for patient care has occurred. The current evidence suggests that telehealth is capable of providing prompt access to quality, cost-efficient orthopedic consultations and assessments. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(4):198--206.].

Currents concepts of the perioperative management of closed ankle fractures

Ankle fractures are common injuries that can result in substantial morbidity in the population. This review discusses the management of closed ankle fractures and outlines the recent evidence and guidelines on perioperative management. In general, a detailed history should be undertaken, followed by examination and imaging of the affected limb. Fixation is based on the AO principles of fracture management that aims towards restoring stability of the joint and reducing the risk of long-term complications. A multidisciplinary approach towards perioperative management is recommended in view of the increasing proportion of aging patients with significant comorbidities.

Adoption of direct discharge of simple stable injuries amongst (orthopaedic) trauma surgeons

INTRODUCTION

The importance of routine follow-up of several relatively simple stable injuries (SSIs) is questionable. Multiple studies show that direct discharge (DD) of patients with SSIs from the Emergency Department results in patient outcomes and experiences comparable to 'standard care' with outpatient follow-up. The purpose of this study was to evaluate to which extent DD of SSIs has been adopted amongst trauma and orthopedic surgeons internationally, and to assess the variation in the management of these common injuries.

METHODS

An online survey was sent to members of an international trauma- and orthopaedic surgery collaboration. Participants, all trauma- or orthopaedic surgeons, were presented with eleven hypothetical cases of patients with simple stable injuries in which they were asked to outline their treatment plan regarding number of follow-up appointments and radiographs, physiotherapy and when to start functional movement. The primary outcome was the proportion of surgeons selecting direct discharge (i.e. zero scheduled appointments), per injury. Secondary outcomes included clinical agreement (>80% of respondents answering similarly) on total number of follow-up appointments (0, 1 or ≥2), radiographs (0, 1 or ≥2), routine physiotherapy referral (yes/no) and when to start functional movement (weeks).

RESULTS

138 of 667 (20.7%) surgeons completed the survey. Adoption of direct discharge ranged from 4-45% of case examples. In 10 out of 11 cases, less than 25% of surgeons selected direct discharge. Clinical agreement regarding number of appointments and when to start functional movement was not reached for any of the injuries. There was clinical agreement on number of radiographs for one injury and for four injuries regarding routine referral to a physiotherapist.

DISCUSSION

Despite available evidence, DD of SSIs has not been widely adopted worldwide. Practice variation still exists even for these common injuries. This variation suggests inefficiency and consequently unnecessarily high healthcare costs. (Orthopaedic) trauma surgeons are encouraged to evaluate their current treatment protocols of SSIs.

Establishing a Virtual Clinic for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: A Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

The aim was to describe the introduction and operation of a virtual developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) clinic. Our secondary objectives were to provide an overview of DDH referral reasons, treatment outcomes, and adverse events associated with it.

METHODS

A prospective observational study involving all patients referred to the virtual DDH clinic was conducted. The clinic consultant delivered with 2 DDH clinical nurse specialists (CNS). The outcomes following virtual review include further virtual review, CNS review, consultant review or discharge. Treatment options include surveillance, brace therapy, or surgery. Efficiency and cost analysis were assessed.

RESULTS

Over the 3.5-year study period, 1002 patients were reviewed, of which 743 (74.2%) were female. The median age at time of referral was 7 months, (interquartile range of 5 to 11) with a median time to treatment decision of 9 days. Median waiting times from referral to treatment decision was reduced by over 70%. There were 639 virtual reviews, 186 CNS reviews, and 144 consultant reviews. The direct discharge rate was 24%. One hundred one patients (10%) had dislocated or subluxed hips at initial visit while 26.3% had radiographically normal hips. Over the study period 704 face to face (F2F) visits were avoided. Cost reductions of €170 were achieved per patient, with €588,804 achieved in total. Eighteen parents (1.8%) opted for F2F instead of virtual review. There were no unscheduled rereferrals or recorded adverse events.

CONCLUSION

We report the outcomes of the first prospective virtual DDH clinic. This clinic has demonstrated efficiency and cost-effectiveness, without reported adverse outcomes to date. It is an option to provide consultant delivered DDH care, while reducing F2F consults.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

A multicentre national study of the effectiveness of virtual fracture clinic management of orthopaedic trauma during the COVID-19 pandemic (MAVCOV): a cross-sectional study protocol

Aims

Virtual fracture clinics (VFCs) are advocated by recent British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma and Orthopaedics (BOASTs) to efficiently manage injuries during the COVID-19 pandemic. The primary aim of this national study is to assess the impact of these standards on patient satisfaction and clinical outcome amid the pandemic. The secondary aims are to determine the impact of the pandemic on the demographic details of injuries presenting to the VFC, and to compare outcomes and satisfaction when the BOAST guidelines were first introduced with a subsequent period when local practice would be familiar with these guidelines.

Methods

This is a national cross-sectional cohort study comprising centres with VFC services across the UK. All consecutive adult patients assessed in VFC in a two-week period pre-lockdown (6 May 2019 to 19 May 2019) and in the same two-week period at the peak of the first lockdown (4 May 2020 to 17 May 2020), and a randomly selected sample during the ‘second wave’ (October 2020) will be eligible for the study. Data comprising local VFC practice, patient and injury characteristics, unplanned re-attendances, and complications will be collected by local investigators for all time periods. A telephone questionnaire will be used to determine patient satisfaction and patient-reported outcomes for patients who were discharged following VFC assessment without face-to-face consultation.

Ethics and dissemination

The study results will identify changes in case-mix and numbers of patients managed through VFCs and whether this is safe and associated with patient satisfaction. These data will provide key information for future expert-led consensus on management of trauma injuries through the VFC. The protocol will be disseminated through conferences and peer-reviewed publication. This protocol has been reviewed by the South East Scotland Research Ethics Service and is classified as a multicentre audit.

Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(3):211–215.

Retrospective cohort study evaluating the efficacy and safety of an orthopaedic consultant-led virtual fracture clinic in an Australian level 1 trauma centre

BACKGROUND

In Australian health care, the consistent rise in demand for orthopaedic outpatient clinic services is creating marked challenges in the provision of quality care. This study investigates the efficacy and safety of a virtual fracture clinic (VFC) as an alternative model of care for the management of acute injuries and musculoskeletal conditions in the Australian public hospital setting.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of consecutive emergency department (ED) referrals to the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery was conducted comparing outcomes prior to (November 2015-February 2017) and after (March 2017-June 2018) implementation of a VFC. The primary outcome measures assessed were the proportion of referrals virtually discharged and unplanned 30-day ED re-attendance rates.

RESULTS

A total of 737 (36.4%) referrals managed by the VFC were discharged without requiring orthopaedic outpatient clinic attendance. The rate of unplanned ED re-attendances was 5.2% post-VFC implementation compared to 6.5% at baseline (P = 0.01). VFC implementation was also associated with reductions in the average number of orthopaedic outpatient clinic attendances per referral (1.1 versus 1.7, P < 0.01) and the number of referrals lost to follow-up (7.2% versus 14.7%, P < 0.01). In addition, patient wait times for first contact by the orthopaedic team were significantly reduced from a median of 7 (IQR 5, 9) days to 2 (IQR 1, 3) days post-intervention (P < 0.01). No complications or adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that a VFC is applicable to the Australian healthcare system, and can lead to effective and safe provision of orthopaedic outpatient care.

Virtual Fracture Clinics in Orthopaedic Surgery - A Systematic Review of Current Evidence

AIMS

Approximately 75% of fractures are simple, stable injuries which are often unnecessarily immobilised with subsequent repeated radiographs at numerous fracture clinic visits. In 2014, the Glasgow Fracture Pathway offered an alternative virtual fracture clinic (VFC) pathway with the potential to reduce traditional fracture clinic visits, waiting times and overall costs. Many units have implemented this style of pathway in the non-operative management of simple, undisplaced fractures. This study aims to systematically review the clinical outcomes, patient reported outcomes and cost analyses for VFCs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two independent reviewers performed the literature search based on PRISMA guidelines, utilizing the MEDLINE, EMBASE and COCHRANE Library databases. Studies reporting outcomes following the use of VFC were included. Outcomes analysed were: 1) clinical outcomes, 2) patient reported outcomes, and 3) cost analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, 15 studies involving 11,921 patients with a mean age of 41.1 years and mean follow-up of 12.6 months were included. In total, 65.7% of patients were directly virtually discharged with protocol derived conservative management, with 9.1% using the Helpline and 15.6% contacting their general practitioner for advice or reassurance. A total of 1.2% of patients experienced fracture non-unions and 0.4% required surgical intervention. The overall patient satisfaction rate was 81.0%, with only 1.3% experiencing residual pain at the fracture site. Additionally, the mean cost per patient for VFC was £71, with a mean saving of £53 when compared to traditional clinic models. Subgroup analysis found that for undisplaced fifth metatarsal or radial head/neck fractures, the rates of discharge from VFC to physiotherapy or general practitioners were 81.2% and 93.7% respectively.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

This study established that there is excellent evidence to support virtual fracture clinic for non-operative management of fifth metatarsal fractures, with moderate evidence for radial head and neck fractures. However, the routine use of virtual fracture clinics is presently not validated for all stable, undisplaced fracture patterns.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; Systematic Review of all Levels of Evidence.

Are Virtual Fracture Clinics During the COVID-19 Pandemic a Potential Alternative for Delivering Fracture Care? A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Virtual fracture clinics are an alternative to the traditional model of fracture care. Since their introduction in 2011, they have become increasingly used in the United Kingdom and Ireland. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) health crisis has driven institutions to examine such innovative solutions to manage patient care. The current controversies include quantifying safety outcomes, such as potential delayed or missed injuries, inadequate treatment, and medicolegal claims. Questions also exist regarding the potential for cost reductions and efficiencies that may be achieved. Physical distancing has limited the number of face-to-face consultations, so this review was conducted to determine if virtual fracture clinics can provide an acceptable alternative in these challenging times.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The aim of this systematic review was to describe (1) adverse outcomes, (2) cost reductions, and (3) efficiencies associated with the virtual fracture clinic model.

METHODS

A systematic review of the PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase databases was conducted from database inception to March 2020. The keywords "virtual" or "telemedicine" or "telehealth" or "remote" or "electronic" AND "fracture" or "trauma" or "triage" AND "clinic" or "consultation" were entered, using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Inclusion criteria included adults and children treated for injuries by a virtual clinic model at the initial review. Eligible injuries included injuries deemed to not need surgical intervention, and those able to be treated remotely using defined protocols. Exclusion criteria consisted of patients reviewed by telemedicine using video links or in person at the initial review. Initially, 1065 articles were identified, with 665 excluded as they did not relate to virtual fracture clinics. In all, 400 articles were screened for eligibility, and 27 full-text reviews were conducted on 18 studies (30,512 virtual fracture clinic encounters). Three subdomains focusing on adverse outcomes, cost reductions, and efficiencies were recorded. The term adverse outcomes was used to describe any complications, further surgeries, re-referrals back to the clinic, or deviations from the protocols. Efficiency described the number of patients reviewed and discharged using the model, savings in clinic slots, reduced waiting times, or a reduction in consumption of resources such as radiographs. All studies were observational and the quality was assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa tool, which demonstrated a median score of 6 ± 1.8, indicating moderate quality.

RESULTS

Six studies reported adverse outcomes in detail, with events ranging from inappropriate splinting, deviations from protocols, and one patient underwent an osteotomy for a malunion. Efficiency varied from direct discharge proportions of 18% in early studies to 100% once the virtual fracture clinic model was more established. Cost reductions compared with estimates derived from conventional fracture clinics varied from USD 53 to USD 297 and USD 39,125 to USD 305876 compared with traditional fracture clinic visits.

CONCLUSIONS

Virtual fracture clinics may provide a means to treat patients remotely, using agreed-upon protocols. They have an important role in the current COVID-19 pandemic, due to the possibility to provide ongoing care in an otherwise challenging setting. More robust studies looking at this model of care will be needed to assess its long-term effects on patients, institutions, and health care systems.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

How useful are virtual fracture clinics?: a systematic review

Background

Due to the overwhelming demand for trauma services, resulting from increasing emergency department attendances over the past decade, virtual fracture clinics (VFCs) have become the fashion to keep up with the demand and help comply with the BOA Standards for Trauma and Orthopaedics (BOAST) guidelines. In this article, we perform a systematic review asking, “How useful are VFCs?”, and what injuries and conditions can be treated safely and effectively, to help decrease patient face to face consultations. Our primary outcomes were patient satisfaction, clinical efficiency and cost analysis, and clinical outcomes.

Methods

We performed a systematic literature search of all papers pertaining to VFCs, using the search engines PubMed, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Database, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) checklist. Searches were carried out and screened by two authors, with final study eligibility confirmed by the senior author.

Results

In total, 21 records were relevant to our research question. Six orthopaedic injuries were identified as suitable for VFC review, with a further four discussed in detail. A reduction of face to face appointments of up to 50% was reported with greater compliance to BOAST guidelines (46.4%) and cost saving (up to £212,000).

Conclusions

This systematic review demonstrates that the VFC model can help deliver a safe, more cost-effective, and more efficient arm of the trauma service to patients.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-11:683–690.

A Service Evaluation after 4 year's use of the Virtual Fracture Clinic model by a District General Hospital in the South West of England

INTRODUCTION

A Virtual fracture clinic (VFC) was set up in 2015. An initial patient satisfaction survey demonstrated satisfaction with the service. The purpose of this service evaluation was to re-evaluate the VFC by reporting on patient satisfaction. A small audit was undertaken alongside to examine the time taken from ED presentation to VFC review against the British Orthopaedic Association Society for Trauma (BOAST) guidelines of 72 h.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients discharged from VFC in August 2019 were eligible to take part in the patient satisfaction survey. The Electronic Patients Records System (EPRS) was used to generate data regarding time of review and patient return for follow up appointments.

RESULTS

The results demonstrated that 88% of patients would recommend the service to friends. More than 80% of patients were satisfied with various elements of the service and 80% of patients are seen within the target time of 72 h.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients continue to be satisfied with the VFC. There seems to be a greater acceptance of not being reviewed by a doctor. In general, patients were seen within 72 h of ED presentation but more work is needed to streamline the process of tertiary referrals.

An analysis of virtual fracture clinics in orthopaedic trauma in the UK during the coronavirus crisis

Virtual fracture clinics (VFC) are advocated by new orthopaedic (British Orthopaedic Association) and National Health Service (NHS) guidelines in the United Kingdom. We discuss benefits and limitations, reviewing the literature, as well as recommendations on introducing a VFC service during the coronavirus pandemic and into the future.A narrative review identifying current literature on virtual fracture clinic outcomes when compared to traditional model fracture clinics in the UK. We identify nine relevant publications related to VFC.The Glasgow model, initiated in 2011, has become the benchmark. Clinical efficiency can be improved, reducing the number of emergency department (ED) referrals seen in VFC by 15-28% and face-to-face consultations by 65%. After review in the VFC, 33-60% of patients may be discharged. Some studies have shown no negative impact on the ED; the time to discharge was not increased. Patient satisfaction ranges from 91-97% using a VFC service, and there may be cost-saving benefits annually of £67,385 to £212,705. Non-attendance may be reduced by 75% and there are educational opportunities for trainees. However, evidence is limited; 28% of patients prefer face-to-face consultations and not all have access to internet or email (72%).We propose a pathway integrating the VFC model, whilst having senior orthopaedic decision makers available in the ED, during normal working hours, to cope with the pandemic. Beyond the pandemic, evidence suggests the Glasgow model is viable for day-to-day practice. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:442-448. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.200041.

Standardised virtual fracture clinic management of Achilles tendon ruptures is safe and reproducible

BACKGROUND

Traditional fracture clinics are some of the busiest clinics in a hospital, often with significant patient waiting times and delays. The use of virtual fracture clinic (VFC) for the management of certain injuries to reduce the workload on the traditional fracture clinic, in addition to reducing costs is growing in popularity. The tendoachilles is the most frequently ruptured tendon in the body but despite this, management remains a keenly debated topic.

METHODS

All adult patients referred to the VFC with an actual or suspected Achilles tendon rupture were identified between January 2015 to October 2017.

RESULTS

This study found that patient with and acute achilles tendon ruptures managed according to a standardised VFC protocol had a re-rupture rate of 3.82%.

CONCLUSIONS

One of the advantages of a VFC model that is standardised, initiated in the ED, is that it has no variation in outcome seen in our patient group.

Trauma assessment clinic: Virtually a safe and smarter way of managing trauma care in Ireland

INTRODUCTION

The Trauma Assessment Clinic [TAC], also referred to as Virtual Fracture Clinic, offers a novel care pathway for patients and is being increasingly utilised across the Irish and UK health care systems. The provision of safe, patient centred, efficient and cost-effective treatment via a multidisciplinary team [MDT] approach is the primary focus of TAC. The Trauma and Orthopaedic unit at Tullamore Hospital was the first centre to introduce a TAC in Ireland and this overview outlines the experiences of this pilot.

METHODS AND PATIENTS

Patients arriving to the Emergency Department with injuries that were TAC appropriate were treated as per a recognised protocol. They were given information regarding their injury and a removable splint or cast and told to expect a follow up phone call from the orthopaedic team. Within 24 h the patient's clinical notes and x-rays were assessed by the TAC MDT and patients were called immediately to be advised as to their planned treatment.

RESULTS

To date the TAC pilot in Tullamore Hospital has reviewed 2704 patients. 35% of patients were discharged at the TAC review stage, 27% were referred to an appropriate clinic (e.g. Shoulder injuries referred to an upper limb specialist) or a general trauma follow-up clinic, and 38% were referred onto physiotherapy services local and community based for follow-up. A survey of patients reviewed in the TAC revealed that 97% of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that they were satisfied with their recovery. The cost of each TAC consultation was €28 versus €129 for a traditional fracture clinic appointment.

CONCLUSION

Our experience of the TAC is that it provides a very safe, patient focused and cost-effective means of delivering trauma care. It provides a more streamlined and improved patient journey in select patients with certain fracture patterns, allowing for patient empowerment without compromising clinical care and marries current available technology with up to date best clinical practice.

Electronic referrals for virtual fracture clinic service using the National Integrated Medical Imaging System (NIMIS)

INTRODUCTION

Virtual fracture clinics (VFC) are now prevalent across many orthopaedic services in the UK and Ireland. The management of a variety of musculoskeletal injuries using the VFC model has been demonstrated to be safe, cost-effective and associated with high levels of patient satisfaction. Referrals were made available through the National Integrated Medical Imaging System (NIMIS). NIMIS allows for electronic movement of patient images throughout the Irish health service.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 157 orthopaedic fracture referrals from a regional hospital was performed. The referrals were received during a 6-week period between May 2016 and June 2016. Each of these referrals was sent electronically. These referrals were reviewed each day by a consultant-led multi-disciplinary team.

RESULTS

Thirty (93%) patients agreed or strongly agreed that they received adequate information in relation to the VFC when they attended the emergency department (ED). All patients except for one either agreed or strongly agreed that they were satisfied with their recovery (97%). Fifteen parents advised us that they would have had to take time off to attend fracture clinic with their child. Two patients attended their general practitioner (GP) or ED to seek further pain relief following their injuries. Only one patient reported a poor clinical outcome. Nine (28%) patients reported that they would have preferred a face-to-face appointment rather than being treated by the VFC.

CONCLUSION

Virtual review of orthopaedic trauma patients results in satisfactory patient outcomes. Clinical outcomes were acceptable with minimal additional medical attention required following injury. Electronic transfer of information allows for the virtual service to operate from sites long distances from the primary orthopaedic centre. The NIMIS is a safe and confidential means of collaborating with other institutions and has huge potential in the areas of trauma care delivery, clinical conferencing and other image-based disciplines.

The "National Integrated Medical Imaging System" [NIMIS]-friend, not nimesis!

INTRODUCTION

The "National Integrated Medical Imaging System" or NIMIS went live in 2011 and allows the movement of patient radiology imaging throughout the Irish health system. At the time of its launch, NIMIS was not only going to allow the filmless passage of patient radiology imaging but it was also envisaged that it would act as a medical image archive. The aim of this study was to assess the awareness and use of non-consultant hospital doctors and hospital consultants with regard to this medical image archive/referral function of NIMIS.

METHODS

A survey was carried out on 50 doctors across all specialities and grades at Tullamore Hospital looking at different aspects of the use of NIMIS.

RESULTS

Ninety-four percent of respondents use NIMIS on a daily basis and 6% use it on a weekly basis. The primary reason for using NIMIS was found to be "Viewing and Ordering Imaging" in 92% of those surveyed with 8% stating it was "Viewing imaging/reports". Ninety-eight percent surveyed said they had never used NIMIS to send a referral form or clinical photograph and 82% were not aware of this potential function. The majority of those surveyed stated that they either agreed or strongly agreed NIMIS is user-friendly.

CONCLUSION

NIMIS allows the safe and confidential flow of patient images and clinical information in the Irish health system. It could provide definite potential in the areas of clinical conferencing, multidisciplinary meetings and remote patient assessment along with collaborative research and education.