History of osteochondral allograft transplantation

Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation in the Shoulder: A Systematic Review of Indications and Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To collate current literature pertaining to the published reports of indications for, and outcomes of, osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantations in the shoulder so as to guide surgeons in the management of various etiologies of osteochondral lesions in this joint.

DESIGN

A systematic review of the current literature was performed in February 2022 in the PubMed, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases using specific search terms and predetermined inclusion/exclusion criteria.

RESULTS

One-hundred-twenty-three articles were initially identified, 30 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, and 17 articles met inclusion criteria. Data were collected for study characteristics, etiology, lesion size/location, intervention/type of graft used, follow-up, and outcomes. In total, 83 shoulders were included (n = 83) in the review with an average follow-up of 45.7 months. Nine specific indications for OCA transplantation in the shoulder included: reverse Hill-Sachs lesions (33), Hill-Sachs lesions (22), pain pump chondrolysis (10), recurrent shoulder instability (7), osteoarthritis/degenerative changes (5), radiofrequency chondrolysis (2), prominent suture anchors (2), glenoid lesion (1), and osteochondritis dissecans (1). Seventeen patients had concomitant surgeries and two patients were lost to follow-up. Of the total 83 shoulders, 68 had favorable outcomes and 13 had unfavorable outcomes as determined by graft incorporation, pain scores, functionality/ROM, patient-reported satisfaction, and/or requirement for revision/arthroplasty. Of the 13 with unfavorable outcomes, a disproportionate number had concomitant surgeries and/or were performed for pain pump chondrolysis (6).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of OCAs appears to be a viable option for a variety of difficult-to-treat shoulder pathologies, particularly those characterized by isolated osteochondral injuries.

Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes for Immediate Unrestricted Weightbearing Versus Restricted Rehabilitation Protocols After Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation to the Distal Femur

Background

There is no standardized rehabilitation protocol after osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation surgery to the distal femur. The spectrum of recommendations includes restrictions to toe-touch weightbearing (TTWB) for 6 weeks and immediate weightbearing as tolerated (WBAT).

Purpose/Hypothesis

The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes for immediate unrestricted WBAT to restricted TTWB after OCA transplantation to the distal femur. It was hypothesized that the immediate WBAT protocol would be noninferior to delayed, restricted TTWB.

Study Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Methods

A total of 74 patients who underwent press-fit, dowel technique OCA transplantation to the femoral condyle(s) for contained (International Cartilage Repair Society grade 3-4) lesions were identified in the Metrics of Osteochondral Allograft multicenter database: 36 patients (18 women/18 men) who were prescribed TTWB were allocated to the control cohort and 38 patients (21 women/17 men) who were prescribed WBAT were allocated to the test cohort. Baseline characteristics were similar except for larger grafts in test patients (3.4 vs 2.7 cm2; P = .004) and higher body mass index (BMI) in control patients (27.8 vs 24.9 kg/m2; P = .01). Failure rates, final patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores, and PRO score changes from baseline were compared between the cohorts. Multiple regression was used to control for potential confounders and investigate noninferiority using minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs).

Results

The mean follow-up was 2 years (range, 1-5 years) in both cohorts. Both cohorts showed significant improvement in all PRO scores, with no significant between-group differences in failure rates, final PRO scores, or PRO changes from baseline. There were 3 cases of failure in each cohort (control cohort: allograft revision [n = 2], debridement [n = 1]; test cohort: chondroplasty [n = 2], conversion to total knee arthroplasty [n = 1]). Regression analysis showed that adjusted differences in final PRO scores based on weightbearing protocol were minor and less than MCIDs when controlling for age, sex, graft size, BMI, and allograft location. Analysis of the MCIDs with respect to the lower bounds of the confidence intervals indicated that WBAT was noninferior to TTWB with a reasonable degree of confidence (range, 84.1%-99.9% confidence).

Conclusion

Results indicated that immediate unrestricted WBAT after OCA transplantation to the distal femur was equally safe and effective compared to restricted TTWB.

Influence of Concomitant Meniscal Allograft Transplantation on Midterm Outcomes After Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation: A Comparative Matched-Pair Analysis

BACKGROUND

Osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCAT) is an accepted knee joint-preserving treatment strategy for focal osteochondral lesions that is often conducted in combination with meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT). Despite its frequent and simultaneous utilization, there remains a lack in the literature reporting on outcomes and failure rates after concomitant procedures.

PURPOSE

To determine (1) the midterm clinical success rate after OCAT+MAT in comparison with a matched-pair cohort undergoing isolated OCAT, (2) whether patient-specific and procedural variables influence the risk of failure, and (3) patient-reported outcome measures over time.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A single-center matched-pair cohort study was conducted investigating outcomes in patients who underwent OCAT of the medial or lateral femoral condyle with and without MAT between 2004 and 2020. Patients were matched 1:1 by age (±5 years), sex (male or female), body mass index (±5), and grouped Kellgren and Lawrence grade (grades 0-1 or 2-4). The minimum follow-up time was 2 years. Radiographic variables (International Cartilage Regeneration & Joint Preservation Society [ICRS] grade and Kellgren and Lawrence grade) were assessed preoperatively and at follow-up. Subjective patient-reported outcome measures (Lysholm score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS] including subscores, International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC] score, and visual analog scale score) were collected preoperatively and at follow-up. Clinical failure was defined as revision surgery for graft failure or conversion to total knee arthroplasty. Patient-reported, clinical, and radiographic outcomes were compared between groups.

RESULTS

In total, 66 patients (33 treated with isolated OCAT, 33 treated with OCAT+MAT; 57.6% male) with a mean age of 26.3 years (range, 18-62 years) were followed for a mean of 5.6 years (minimum, 2 years; range, 24-218 months). The 2 cohorts showed no difference in Kellgren and Lawrence grade postoperatively (P = .59). There was a significantly higher ICRS grade detected at follow-up in the OCAT+MAT group (2.81 ± 1.10) compared with the OCAT group (2.04 ± 0.96) (P < .05). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups regarding reoperation rate (OCAT: n = 6; OCAT+MAT: n = 13; P = .116), time to reoperation (OCAT: 46.67 ± 47.27 months vs OCAT+MAT: 28.08 ± 30.16 months; P = .061), and failure rate (OCAT: n = 4 [12.1%] vs OCAT+MAT: n = 5 [15.2%]; P = .66). In the OCAT+MAT group, an increase of tibial slope by 1° conferred a 1.65-fold increase in the hazard for failure over decreased slope (hazard ratio, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.10-2.50; P < .05). The overall survival rate was 86% at a mean follow-up of 5.6 years. Patient-reported outcome scores were significantly improved at the final follow-up compared with preoperative status. No significant differences were seen between groups with respect to subjective IKDC, Lysholm, Tegner, and KOOS results, except for the KOOS Symptoms subscale score, which was significantly higher in the OCAT+MAT group than in the OCAT group (mean difference, 14.6; P < .05) and did exceed the minimal clinically important difference threshold of 10.7.

CONCLUSION

Midterm results after isolated OCAT and OCAT+MAT show high rates of healing and sustainable subjective improvement of knee function and quality of life. However, it should be noted that the difference in reoperation rate and time to reoperation between the groups is arguably clinically important and that lack of statistical significance may be because of low power. These results imply that isolated OCAT is an efficient joint-preserving treatment that can be combined with MAT in well-selected patients with meniscal insufficiency without negative influence on global clinical outcomes.

Intra-articular injection of ascorbic acid enhances microfracture-mediated cartilage repair

Previous studies have confirmed that ascorbic acid (AA) can promote cartilage repair and improve cartilage differentiation in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. However, the use of microfracture (MFX) combined with AA to repair cartilage damage has not been studied. This study established a rabbit animal model and treated cartilage injury with different concentrations of AA combined with MFX. Macroscopic observations, histological analysis, immunohistochemical analysis and reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis of TGF-β, AKT/Nrf2, and VEGF mRNA expression were performed. The results showed that intra-articular injection of AA had a positive effect on cartilage repair mediated by microfractures. Moreover, 10 mg/ml AA was the most effective at promoting cartilage repair mediated by microfractures. Intra-articular injection of AA promoted the synthesis of type II collagen and the formation of glycosaminoglycans by downregulating the mRNA expression of TGF-β and VEGF. In summary, this study confirmed that AA could promote cartilage repair after MFX surgery.

Young Age and Concomitant or Prior Bony Realignment Procedures are Associated with Decreased Risk of Failure of Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation in the Knee: A Nationwide Database Study

OBJECTIVE

Osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation is a restorative surgical option for large, full-thickness chondral or osteochondral defects in the knee. Variability in outcomes reporting has led to a broad range of graft survival rates. Using rate of salvage surgery following OCA as a failure metric, the purpose of this study was to analyze the incidence and risk factors for failure in a nationwide cohort.

DESIGN

The M151Ortho PearlDiver database was queried for patients aged 20 to 59 who underwent primary OCA between 2010 and 2020. Patients with prior cartilage procedures or arthroplasty were excluded. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to characterize cumulative rate of salvage surgery, defined as any patient subsequently undergoing revision OCA, autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI), osteochondral autograft transfer system (OATS), unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the effect of several variables on odds of salvage surgery.

RESULTS

Around 6,391 patients met inclusion criteria. Cumulative 5-year salvage rate was 1.71%, with 68.8% in the first 2 years. Age 20 to 29 and concomitant or prior bony realignment procedures were associated with significantly decreased rate of salvage surgery (age-adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24-0.99, P = 0.046; realignment-aOR = 0.24, 95% CI, 0.04-0.75, P = 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

In the largest OCA cohort studied to date, less than 2% of patients required salvage surgery. Young age and bony realignment were protective. These findings suggest that OCA in the knee is a durable cartilage-restoration procedure, especially in young patients with corrected alignment.

Research Progress of Design Drugs and Composite Biomaterials in Bone Tissue Engineering

Bone, like most organs, has the ability to heal naturally and can be repaired slowly when it is slightly injured. However, in the case of bone defects caused by diseases or large shocks, surgical intervention and treatment of bone substitutes are needed, and drugs are actively matched to promote osteogenesis or prevent infection. Oral administration or injection for systemic therapy is a common way of administration in clinic, although it is not suitable for the long treatment cycle of bone tissue, and the drugs cannot exert the greatest effect or even produce toxic and side effects. In order to solve this problem, the structure or carrier simulating natural bone tissue is constructed to control the loading or release of the preparation with osteogenic potential, thus accelerating the repair of bone defect. Bioactive materials provide potential advantages for bone tissue regeneration, such as physical support, cell coverage and growth factors. In this review, we discuss the application of bone scaffolds with different structural characteristics made of polymers, ceramics and other composite materials in bone regeneration engineering and drug release, and look forward to its prospect.

Progress and prospect of technical and regulatory challenges on tissue-engineered cartilage as therapeutic combination product

Hyaline cartilage plays a critical role in maintaining joint function and pain. However, the lack of blood supply, nerves, and lymphatic vessels greatly limited the self-repair and regeneration of damaged cartilage, giving rise to various tricky issues in medicine. In the past 30 years, numerous treatment techniques and commercial products have been developed and practiced in the clinic for promoting defected cartilage repair and regeneration. Here, the current therapies and their relevant advantages and disadvantages will be summarized, particularly the tissue engineering strategies. Furthermore, the fabrication of tissue-engineered cartilage under research or in the clinic was discussed based on the traid of tissue engineering, that is the materials, seed cells, and bioactive factors. Finally, the commercialized cartilage repair products were listed and the regulatory issues and challenges of tissue-engineered cartilage repair products and clinical application would be reviewed.

•

Tissue engineered cartilage, a promising strategy for articular cartilage repair.

•

Nearly 20 engineered cartilage repair products in clinic based on clinical techniques.

•

Combination product, the classification of tissue-engineered cartilage.

•

Key regulatory compliance issues for combination products.

Fresh Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation in the Knee: A Viability and Histologic Analysis for Optimizing Graft Viability and Expanding Existing Standard Processed Graft Resources Using a Living Donor Cartilage Program

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to (1) determine and validate living cartilage allograft transplantation as a novel source for viable osteochondral allograft (OCA) tissues and (2) perform histologic and viability comparisons of living donor cartilage tissues to currently available clinical-grade standard processed grafts.

DESIGN

Using healthy cartilage from well-preserved contralateral compartments in 27 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and 10 clinical-grade OCA specimens obtained immediately following operative implantation, standard and living donor OCA quality was evaluated at the time of harvest and following up to 3 weeks of storage on the basis of macroscopic International Cartilage Repair Society grade, histology, and viability.

RESULTS

Osteochondral samples demonstrated a consistent decrease in viability and histologic quality over the first 3 weeks of storage at 37°C, supporting the utility of an OCA paradigm shift toward early implantation, as was the clinical standard up until recent adoption of transplantation at 14 to 35 days following donor procurement. Samples from the 10 clinical-grade OCAs, implanted at an average of 23 days following graft harvest demonstrated a mean viable cell density of 45.6% at implantation, significantly lower (P < 0.01) than the 93.6% viability observed in living donor allograft tissues.

CONCLUSIONS

Osteochondral tissue viability and histologic quality progressively decreases with ex vivo storage, even when kept at physiologic temperatures. Currently available clinical OCAs are stored for 2 to 5 weeks prior to implantation and demonstrate inferior viability to that of fresh osteochondral tissues that can be made available through the use of a living donor cartilage program.

Management of Chondral Defects Associated with Patella Instability

Cartilage defects of the patellofemoral joint are commonly found in association with patellar instability owing to abnormal biomechanics. Strategies to address chondral defects of the patellofemoral joint secondary to instability should first address causes of recurrent instability. Most patellofemoral chondral defects associated with instability are less than 2 cm2 and do not generally require intervention beyond chondroplasty. Larger defects of the patella and/or the trochlea can be repaired with osteochondral or surface cartilage repair.

Acetabular Coverage May Affect Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation of Focal Femoral Head Lesions: A Case Series From a Single Institution

Osteochondral lesions of the femoral head in young people are rare and present unique management challenges. Optimal treatment for these lesions is unclear. From 2009 to 2016, clinical and radiographic outcomes were prospectively collected within a series of symptomatic focal osteochondral lesions of the femoral head with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. A surgical hip dislocation followed by implantation of a size-matched fresh osteochondral femoral head allograft was performed. Nine hips in eight patients (6 female patients) underwent surgery at an average of 17 years (11 to 21 years). Individual allograft sizes ranged from 10 to 35 mm in diameter; with 2 of 9 hips receiving two allografts in a stacked or mosaicplasty technique at the time of treatment. The average graft implantation was 3536.5 mm2. Modified Harris hip scores improved by 13.4 (P = 0.018) from preoperative to final follow-up for all patients. Significant improvements in internal rotation (12° versus 23°, P = 0.011), external rotation (32° versus 50°, P = 0.041), and abduction (28° versus 40°, P = 0.042) were also achieved. Three patients (four hips) demonstrated poor radiographic healing (<50% incorporation at 2 years), which correlated with worse clinical outcomes and was associated with a lower preoperative lateral center edge angle (21.5° versus 30.4°, P = 0.049). Fresh osteochondral allograft treatment is a good option for focal osteochondral lesions of the femoral head with improved outcomes and motion; however, higher failure rates may be seen in those with a lower center edge angle.

3D printing of implantable elastic PLCL copolymer scaffolds

Poly(l-lactic acid) (PLLA) scaffolds have been used in regenerative medicine, however, they commonly suffer from low flexibility, restricting their application in the repair and reconstruction of soft tissues. In this study, poly(l-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone) (PLCL) copolymers were examined to modulate the elasticity of PLLA with the random presence of CL units in PLLA. Thermodynamic analysis revealed that the introduction of PCL could significantly decrease the melting point and glass transition temperature of PLLA, benefiting the extrusion and printing of PLCL. Diverse scaffolds with designed architectures including porous cubes with or without large holes, cambered plates with holes and round tubes could be easily constructed by 3D printing. In the process of elastic deformation, the maximum elastic stress of the copolymer scaffold was obviously increased from 19.6 to 31.5 MPa when the relative content of PCL was increased to 70%, while the elongation at break was evidently increased from 388% to about 1974%. The Young's modulus of PLCL was also significantly decreased (P < 0.05) in comparison with that of PLLA. PLCL scaffolds have good platelet and endotheliocyte adhesion ability and no obvious hemolysis was observed. In vivo subcutaneous implantation of PLCL scaffolds demonstrated superior biocompatibility. Collectively, this work highlights that copolymerization of PCL segments into PLLA is an effective approach to tune the 3D printability and the stiffness and elasticity of PLLA scaffolds. PLCL scaffolds hold great promise for the regeneration of soft tissues including but not limited to cartilage, myocardium, muscle, tendon and nervous tissues.

Use of Allografts in Orthopaedic Surgery: Safety, Procurement, Storage, and Outcomes

The use of allografts has become a vital option for orthopaedic surgeons in the treatment of a variety of musculoskeletal lesions, ranging from osteochondral defects in the glenohumeral joint to meniscal deficiency in the young athlete. Nevertheless, barriers to treating a patient with an allograft-based procedure may arise from concerns over disease transmission, the navigation of tissue banks that supply allografts, the process of obtaining insurance approval, or optimal storage methods. This review serves to support orthopaedic surgeons in the incorporation of allografts into their practice by quelling these potential concerns. Fresh osteochondral allografts, fresh-frozen meniscal allografts, soft tissue allografts, and off-the-shelf cartilage products are the focus of this review amid broad overviews of allograft safety and tissue bank practices in the United States.

Autologous costal chondral transplantation and costa-derived chondrocyte implantation: emerging surgical techniques

It is a great challenge to cure symptomatic lesions and considerable defects of hyaline cartilage due to its complex structure and poor self-repair capacity. If left untreated, unmatured degeneration will cause significant complications. Surgical intervention to repair cartilage may prevent progressive joint degeneration. A series of surgical techniques, including biological augmentation, microfracture and bone marrow stimulation, autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI), and allogenic and autogenic chondral/osteochondral transplantation, have been used for various indications. However, the limited repairing capacity and the potential pitfalls of these techniques cannot be ignored. Increasing evidence has shown promising outcomes from ACI and cartilage transplantation. Nevertheless, the morbidity of autologous donor sites and limited resource of allogeneic bone have considerably restricted the wide application of these surgical techniques. Costal cartilage, which preserves permanent chondrocytes and the natural osteochondral junction, is an ideal candidate for the restoration of cartilage defects. Several in vitro and in vivo studies have shown good performance of costal cartilage transplantation. Although costal cartilage is a classic donor in plastic and cosmetic surgery, it is rarely used in skeletal cartilage restoration. In this review, we introduce the fundamental properties of costal cartilage and summarize costa-derived chondrocyte implantation and costal chondral/osteochondral transplantation. We will also discuss the pitfalls and pearls of costal cartilage transplantation. Costal chondral/osteochondral transplantation and costa-based chondrocytotherapy might be up-and-coming surgical techniques for recalcitrant cartilage lesions.

Transplantation and Alternatives to Treat Autoimmune Diseases

Transplantation is considered as one of the methods for the treatment of autoimmune diseases. There are different sorts of transplantation which improved the situation for the cure of different kinds of autoimmune diseases. Cord blood transplantation is favored over other transplant techniques. The propelled treatments incorporate interferon administrative elements and mesenchymal stromal cells for the management of immune system issue particularly in the treatment of rheumatoid joint inflammation. According to the studies conducted, it was proven that cord blood/UC mesenchymal cells along with DMARDs, without consistent organization expanded the level of administrative regulatory T-cells of the peripheral blood which might be a protected and huge technique for the treatment of patients experiencing rheumatoid joint inflammation. This review article focusses on different organ transplantation and alternative methods to treat autoimmune condition like rheumatoid arthritis. Using 3D printing and artificial intelligence are some of the recent trends that may be used for the management of autoimmune diseases.

[Non-cryoconserving storage strategies for fresh osteochondral allografts]

BACKGROUND

The clinical outcome of fresh allogeneic osteochondral allografts (OCA) is greatly dependent on the number of viable chondrocytes at the time of implantation. The selection and preparation of a suitable recipient can be very time-consuming and the number of tissue donors is greatly limited; therefore, the preservation of high allograft viability before transplantation is a focal point of current research.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review is to give an overview of established storage strategies for OCA and to serve as a decision-making aid for German clinics in the choice of a suitable storage strategy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A search of the literature published between January 2002 and May 2017 was independently performed by two persons with respect to original works on storage strategies of OCA with a focus on storage medium, use of fetal bovine serum, storage temperature and change of medium. A total of 20 suitable studies were selected for this review.

RESULTS

Based on the current studies a clearly superior storage solution could not be identified; however, storage at 4 °C seems to give better results with respect to cell viability than storage at 37 °C. High chondrocyte viability rates after 28 days of storage were also achieved using media without the addition of fetal bovine serum.

CONCLUSION

A major difficulty in comparing the relevant studies on storage solutions is that multiple aspects in the study design varied between the studies. Due to this no definite conclusion on what the ideal storage strategy should look like could be drawn. Further studies are needed to conclusively show whether cell culture medium-based storage solutions are truly superior to those based on Ringer-lactate solutions.