Subtrochanteric fractures: Issues and challenges

Comparative biomechanical analysis of reconstruction and cephalomedullary nails in the treatment of osteoporotic subtrochanteric fractures

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to compare the biomechanical properties of two types of intramedullary nails - reconstruction nails (RCN) and cephalomedullary nails (CMN) - each with different proximal fixations, in a model of an osteoporotic subtrochanteric femoral fracture. This study focused on assessing stiffness and load to failure of RCN and CMN nails to provide insight into their clinical applications in osteoporotic fracture treatments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten synthetic osteoporotic femoral models were used to generate a comminuted subtrochanteric fracture model. Five femurs were fixed using an RCN, and the remaining five were fixed using a CMN. The constructs were subjected to axial compression to measure their structural stiffness, load to failure, and failure modes.

RESULTS

The CMN group demonstrated a slightly higher load to failure (mean, 2250 N) than the RCN group (mean, 2100 N), which was statistically significant (p = 0.008). However, the stiffness in both groups was statistically similar (RCN, 250 N/mm; CMN, 255 N/mm; p = 0.69). Both groups showed a load to failure exceeding 1500 N, a typically exerted load on the femoral head by a 75 kg individual. The failure patterns differed, with CMN failures starting at the nail insertion area and RCN failures starting at the reconstruction screw area.

CONCLUSION

The RCN offers stiffness comparable to that of the CMN; although its load to failure is slightly lower than that of the CMN, it still exceeds the physiological tolerance limit. These findings suggest that the RCN is a viable alternative for treating osteoporotic subtrochanteric fractures.

Subtrochanteric femur nonunion - Chasing the elusive an analysis of two techniques to achieve union: Nail-plate fixation and plate-structural fibula graft fixation

INTRODUCTION

The subtrochanteric region is known for its unique biomechanical properties that contribute to challenges in fracture reduction. To ensure optimal fracture healing, achieving robust mechanical stability is essential. There are very few studies in the literature describing the treatment of subtrochanteric fracture nonunion.

PURPOSE

To analyze the outcomes of two techniques of revision fixation of nonunion in subtrochanteric femur fracture, namely, nail-plate fixation and plate-structural fibula graft fixation.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of subtrochanteric femur nonunion between January 2011 and December 2019. The demographic details, details of the index surgery, details of the revision surgery and the time to final union were collected. The nonunion was divided based on the level of the fracture into high subtrochanteric and low subtrochanteric. Two revision techniques were used: plate-structural fibula graft for high subtrochanteric and nail-plate construct for low subtrochanteric femur fractures RESULTS: Out of the 54 patients that were included, there was malalignment in 53.70 %, medial comminution in 46.3 %, distraction at the fracture site in 44.4 %, lateral trochanteric wall break in 37.03 % and implant failure in 70.37 % of the patients. There were 20 high subtrochanteric and 34 low subtrochanteric fractures. Union was achieved in 53 patients (98.14 %). The mean LEFS score was 71.4 in the nail-plate group and 66.2 in the plate-structural fibula graft group (p 0.003).

CONCLUSION

The treatment of subtrochanteric femur fracture nonunion can be a daunting task. The goal is to correct the varus and restore the medial support which will prevent the occurrence of collapse and another failure. We were able to achieve this with both the nail-plate and the plate- structural fibula graft revision methods.

The effect of valgus reduction on resistant subtrochanteric femoral non-unions: a single-centre report of twenty six cases

PURPOSE

Re-revision of subtrochanteric non-unions is technically challenging and lacks robust evidence. The results of managing subtrochanteric fractures after multiple failed procedures have rarely been reported in the literature. This study aims to evaluate the effect of valgus reduction on non-united subtrochanteric fractures with single or multiple failed revision surgeries.

METHODS

Twenty-six patients with aseptic subtrochanteric fracture non-union underwent failed single or multiple revision procedures after index fracture fixation surgery between 2011 and 2019. The exclusion criteria were as follows: septic non-union, peri-prosthetic, and pathological fractures. Lateral-based wedge valgus reduction and compression at the non-union site using a valgus-contoured DCS together with decortication, debridement, and bone grafting were used. The main outcome measurement was radiological union, pain, LLD, HHS, and restoration of pre-fracture activities.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 4.5 years (range 3 to 7); prior revision surgeries range from two to five and union at 6.5 months (range 3 to 10) and the delayed union in one case and an infected non-union in one case. The mean LLD was 4 cm (range 3 to 5), which improved to 1.5 cm (range 1 to 4) (P-value < 0.001). The mean VAS was 7 (range 6 to 8), and 24 patients achieved painless ambulation without a walking aid after the union. The mean HHS was 40 (range 25 to 65), which improved to 85 (range 55 to 95) (P-value < 001), achieving 15 excellent, ten good, and one poor results.

CONCLUSION

Mechanical optimisation by lateral closing wedge and stable fixation with pre-contoured DCS with biological enhancement resulted in a successful outcome in recalcitrant subtrochanteric non-unions.

Intramedullary nailing for irreducible spiral subtrochanteric fractures: A comparison of cerclage and non-cerclage wiring

PURPOSE

Intramedullary nailing is the preferred internal fixation technique for the treatment of subtrochanteric fractures because of its biomechanical advantages. However, no definitive conclusion has been reached regarding whether combined cable cerclage is required during intramedullary nailing treatment. This study was performed to compare the clinical effects of intramedullary nailing with cerclage and non-cerclage wiring in the treatment of irreducible spiral subtrochanteric fractures.

METHODS

Patients with subtrochanteric fractures admitted to our center from January 2013 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were enrolled in the case-control study according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria and divided into the non-cerclage group and the cerclage group. The patients' clinical data, including the operative time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, reoperation rate, fracture union time, and Harris hip score, were compared between these 2 groups. Categorical variables were compared using Chi-square or Fisher's exact test. Continuous variables with normal distribution were presented as mean ± standard deviation and analyzed with Student's t-test. Non-normally distributed variables were expressed as median (Q1, Q3) and assessed using the Mann-Whitney test. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

In total, 69 patients were included in the study (35 patients in the non-cerclage group and 34 patients in the cerclage group). The baseline data of the 2 groups were comparable. There were no significant difference in the length of hospital stay (z = -0.391, p = 0.696), operative time (z = -1.289, p = 0.197), or intraoperative blood loss (z = -1.321, p = 0.186). However, compared with non-cerclage group, the fracture union time was shorter (z = -5.587, p < 0.001), the rate of nonunion was lower (χ2 = 6.030, p = 0.03), the anatomical reduction rate was higher (χ2 = 5.449, p = 0.03), and the Harris hip score was higher (z = -2.99, p = 0.003) in the cerclage group, all with statistically significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Intramedullary nailing combined with cable cerclage wiring is a safe and reliable technique for the treatment of irreducible subtrochanteric fractures. This technique can improve the reduction effect, increase the stability of fracture fixation, shorten the fracture union time, reduce the occurrence of nonunion, and contribute to the recovery of hip joint function.

Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Reduction With Cerclage Fixation in Spiral or Oblique Subtrochanteric Femoral Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing Cables and Wires

OBJECTIVES

To compare the outcomes of a minimally invasive reduction (MIR) technique using a cable and wire in spiral or oblique subtrochanteric femoral fractures (SFFs).

METHODS

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Two University Hospitals.

PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA

Skeletally mature patients with spiral or oblique SFFs (OTA/AO 32A1 and 32A2) treated with intramedullary nailing and MIR with a cerclage wire passer using either a single-loop cable or cerclage wire or MIR without cable or wire between May 2016 and November 2021 were included.

OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS

Coronal and sagittal interfragmentary gap, neck-shaft angle, coronal and sagittal angulation, fracture union, time to union, and Radiographic Union Score for Hip (RUSH) at 6 months post operation were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 46 patients were included, with 16 each in the cable and wire groups and 14 in the non-wiring group. There were no differences in demographics ( P > 0.05), fracture classification ( P = 0.710), or operative data ( P > 0.05) between the three groups. The cable group showed significantly better coronal ( P = 0.003) and sagittal ( P = 0.003) interfragmentary gap, shorter union time ( P < 0.001), and higher 6-month RUSH score ( P < 0.001) among the three groups. There were no significant differences in outcome measures between the wire and non-wiring groups (all P > 0.05). No mechanical complications or reoperations were observed in all three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive reduction using a cable is more effective than wire or non-wiring reduction to improve reduction quality and promote bone union in the SFFs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Atypical Versus Typical Subtrochanteric Femoral Fractures: Disparate Patient Profiles, Similar Outcomes

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate differences in demographic features and clinical outcomes between patients who sustained a typical versus atypical subtrochanteric femoral fracture.

METHODS

We reviewed the records for a cohort of consecutive patients who had undergone operative treatment of a subtrochanteric femoral fracture. Fractures were classified as either "typical" or "atypical" on the basis of the criteria of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR). All patients were treated with a similar surgical algorithm and postoperative protocol. Groups were compared on the basis of demographic features, injury characteristics, operative quality measures, postoperative complications and outcomes, and radiographic time to healing. Comparative analyses were performed to compare the typical and atypical cohorts.

RESULTS

Of 220 subtrochanteric fractures, 165 (75.0%) were classified as typical and 55 (25.0%) were classified as atypical. The atypical cohort was predominately female and more likely to have bisphosphonate usage (odds ratio [OR], 7.975; [95% confidence interval (CI), 3.994-15.922]; p < 0.001) and fractures with lower-energy mechanisms (p < 0.001). Patients in the atypical cohort were more likely to be treated with a 10-mm cephalomedullary nail (CMN) (OR, 2.100 [95% CI, 1.119-3.939]; p = 0.020), whereas patients in the typical cohort were treated more frequently with an 11-mm CMN (OR, 0.337 [95% CI, 0.168-0.674]; p = 0.002). There were no differences between the groups in terms of other operative parameters; however, anatomic fracture reduction in neutral lateral alignment was achieved more frequently in the typical cohort (OR, 0.438 [95% CI, 0.220-0.875]; p = 0.018). There were no differences between the groups in terms of hospital quality measures, mortality rates, readmission rates, or complication rates (including implant failure [broken screw or nail] and fracture nonunion) (p = 1.00). Interestingly, there was no significant difference between the groups in terms of time to radiographic healing (260.30 ± 187.97 days in the typical group, compared with 246.40 ± 116.33 days in the atypical group) (OR, 0.999 [95% CI, 0.997-1.002]; p = 0.606).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite differences in terms of demographic and injury characteristics, patients who sustain a subtrochanteric femur fracture can expect similar outcome profiles regardless of fracture type.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Efficacy of Physiotherapy Rehabilitation for Subtrochanteric Femur Fracture: A Case Report

Proximal femur fractures that occur within 5 cm of the lesser trochanter are commonly referred to as subtrochanteric femur fractures (STF). In this case report, we depicted a 45-year-old who came with a history of road traffic accident (RTA) for which an investigation like an X-ray was performed which revealed STF and the patient was surgically managed. Postoperatively, the patient's main complaints were pain around the hip joint with restriction in performing hip joint full range of motion. For these complaints, she was given physiotherapy. There was a reduction in joint pain, a significant improvement in joint movement, and increased muscle strength which was observed after evaluating the outcome measures.

Biomechanical Behavior of Dynamic vs. Static Distal Locking Intramedullary Nails in Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures

OBJECTIVE

Hip fractures are one of the most frequent fractures presenting to the emergency department and orthopedic trauma teams. The aim of this study was to determine the best indication and therapeutic technique for subtrochanteric fractures and unifying criteria when choosing the most suitable type of nail.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

To analyze the influence of the material and the type of distal locking of intramedullary nails (static or dynamic), a femur model with a fracture in the subtrochanteric region stabilized with a long Gamma intramedullary nail was applied using finite element method (FEM) simulation.

RESULTS

The mechanical study shows that titanium nails allow for greater micromobility at the fracture site, which could act as a stimulus for the formation of callus and consolidation of the fracture. In the mechanical study, the type of distal locking mainly affects mobility at the fracture site and stress in the cortical bone around the distal screws, without in any case exceeding values that may compromise the viability of the assembly or that may result in detrimental effects (in terms of mobility at the fracture site) for the consolidation process.

CONCLUSION

Subtrochanteric fractures treated with titanium nail and static distal locking is safe and does not hinder consolidation.

Intramedullary nail fixation assisted by locking plate for complex subtrochanteric femur fractures: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

This study aims to compare therapeutic effects of two methods in complicated subtrochanteric femur fractures surgery: intramedullary nail fixation assisted with lateral monocortical locking plate versus intramedullary nail fixation assisted with supplementary cables.

METHODS

From June 2015 to June 2020, seventy-seven patients with complex subtrochanteric fractures (i.e., Seinsheimer's classification type IV or V) were included in this study. Thirty-six patients (plate group) were operated using the intramedullary nail fixation assisted by lateral monocortical locking plate, and forty-one patients (cable group) were using the intramedullary nail fixation assisted by cables. The clinical information and demographic results were collected and compared.

RESULTS

Operation time of plate group was shorter than cable group and the Incisions length of plate group was longer. The fluoroscopy times were 22.8 ± 8.2 in plate group and 33.0 ± 9.0 in cable group (p < 0.01). Compared with the cable group, patients in plate group used less cerclage cables (p < 0.01). Patients in the plate group has less medial cortex displacement compared with the cable group. (p = 0.038). As for the angular difference of neck shaft angle between operated hip and uninjured hip, plate group has less difference compared with the cable group. Time to union was 14.2 ± 3.1 weeks in plate group which is shorter than the cable group (17.9 ± 4.8 weeks). In terms of follow up period, number of malunion, Harris hip score, walking ability and traumatic hip rating scale, no significant differences were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that using lateral monocortical plate as an auxiliary way may have a longer surgical incision and more intraoperative blood loss, however, the operation time is shorter, the fluoroscopy times is less, and the time to union is shorter. Intramedullary nail fixation assisted by lateral monocortical locking plate may be a new option for patients with complex subtrochanteric femur fractures.

Nail breakage in patients with hypertrophic pseudoarthrosis after subtrochanteric femur fracture: treatment with exchanging nail and decortication

In this study, we aimed to show the results of exchange nail and decortication in patients whose subtrochanteric femur fractures were treated with intramedullary nails and subsequently developed fracture nonunion and nail breakage com- plications. This study consisted of patients presenting with subtrochanteric femur fractures between January 2013 and April 2019 who underwent surgery and later experienced nail breakage due to hypertrophic nonunion. There were a total of 10 patients aged 26-62 years (Avg 40,30, SD: 9,989). Nine patients were smokers, and 1 patient had diabetes and hypertension. Three patients were admitted to the trauma center due to a car accident and 7 patients were admitted because of a fall. The infection parameters of all patients were normal. All patients had pathological movement complications and pain at the fracture site. Preoperatively, medulla diameter was measured with standard radiography in all patients. The diameters of the old nails applied to the patients ranged from 10 to 12 mm, and the diameters of the newly applied nails ranged from 14 to 16 mm. The fracture lines of all patients were opened to remove the broken nails, and decortication was performed. No additional autograft or allograft was applied to any patient. Union was achieved in all patients. We conclude that the use of larger diameter nails in conjunction with decortication will prevent nail breakage, improve healing and provide early union in patients with subtrochanteric femur fractures with hypertrophic pseudoarthrosis.

Blood loss and transfusion risk in intramedullary nailing for subtrochanteric fractures

BACKGROUND

The incidence of hip fractures and subtrochanteric fractures in particular is increasing, along with the globally expanding aging population. Intramedullary nailing remains the 'gold standard' of their treatment. Blood loss can be a result of the original trauma, but also secondary to the subsequent surgical insult, especially during the reaming of the intramedullary canal.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of our study was to report on the blood loss and incidence of blood transfusion in patients presenting with a subtrochanteric fracture treated with intramedullary nailing. Most importantly, we aim to identify factors associated with the need for transfusion within the first 48 h post-operatively.

METHODS

Following institutional board approval, 431 consecutive patients (131 males; age: 79.03 years old, SD 13.68 years) presenting in a Level 1 Trauma Centre with a subtrochanteric fracture treated with an intramedullary nail were retrospectively identified, over an 8-year period. Exclusion criteria included patients with high energy injuries, pathological fractures, primary operations at other institutions and patients lost to follow-up. To identify risk factors leading to increased risk of transfusion, we first compared patients requiring intra-operative transfusion or transfusion during the first 48 h post-operatively against those who did not require transfusion. This was then followed by multivariate regression analysis adjusted for confounding factors to identify the most important risk factors associated with need for transfusion within the first 48 h post-operatively.

RESULTS

Incidence of blood transfusion was 6.0% pre-operatively, compared to 62.7% post-operatively. A total of 230 patients (52.3%) required either intra-operative transfusion or transfusion during the first 48 h following surgery. Patients having a transfusion within the first 48 h post-operatively had a higher incidence of escalation in their care (p = 0.050), LOS (p = 0.015), 30-day (p = 0.033) and one-year mortality (p = 0.004). Multivariate regression analysis adjusted for confounding factors identified that the most important association of a need for transfusion within the first 48 post-operative hours was a pre-operative Hb <100 g/L (OR 6.64); a nail/canal ratio <70% (OR 3.92), followed by need for open reduction (OR 2.66). Fracture involving the lesser trochanter was also implicated with an increased risk (OR 2.08). Additionally, pre-operative moderate/severe renal impairment (OR 4.56), as well as hypoalbuminaemia on admission (OR 2.10) were biochemical predictors of an increased risk of transfusion. Most importantly, the need for transfusion was associated with an increase in 30-day mortality (OR 12.07).

CONCLUSION

Several patient, fracture and surgery related factors are implicated with an increased risk for transfusion within the first 48-h post-operatively. Early identification, and where possible correction of these factors can potentially reduce blood loss and risk of transfusion, along with all the associated sequelae and mortality risk.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Medium-Term Outcomes of a Forward-Striking Technique to Reduce Fracture Gaps during Long Cephalomedullary Nailing in Subtrochanteric Femoral Fractures

INTRODUCTION

A residual fracture gap after intramedullary nailing is a known risk factor for delayed union and non-union. This study aimed to report the outcomes of a forward-striking technique to reduce fracture gaps during long cephalomedullary nailing in subtrochanteric femoral fractures (SFFs).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients with SFFs treated in a single institution between February 2013 and October 2018. A total of 58 patients treated via long cephalomedullary nailing with a forward-striking technique were included. The width of the fracture gap, location of the cephalic screw, tip-apex distance (TAD), and time to bone union were evaluated using intraoperative and postoperative radiographs. Complication rates, including fixation failure, non-union, implant breakage, and infection, were assessed. The mean follow-up duration was 4 (range, 2‒8) years.

RESULTS

Of the 58 patients (mean age, 67.9 years), 38 (65.5%) were female. Thirty-two cases (55.2%) were classified as atypical femoral fractures. The mean fracture gap reduced from 5.1 mm to 1.6 mm by forward striking (P<0.001). The reduced fracture gap was significantly greater in atypical SFFs (mean, 4.9 mm vs. 1.7 mm; P<0.001). The lag screw was located in the center-center or center-inferior zones of the femoral head in 54 patients (93.1%). The mean TAD was 14.2 mm and was under 25 mm in 55 patients (94.8%). Bone union was achieved in all cases without reoperation at a mean of 5.4 months. One incident of lag screw breakage was noted at 5 months, but bone union was achieved at 7 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The forward-striking technique with a long cephalomedullary nail demonstrated a 100% bone union rate in a consecutive series of 58 SFFs. This technique is effective in reducing the fracture gap as well as placing the cephalic screw into the optimal position. The forward-striking technique was particularly effective in reducing atypical SFFs with a transverse or short oblique configuration.

Subtrochanteric femoral fractures and intramedullary nailing complications: a comparison of two implants

INTRODUCTION

Intramedullary (IM) nails are considered the 'gold' standard treatment for subtrochanteric femoral fractures. The incidence and risk factors for re-operation in subtrochanteric fractures remain unclear. Furthermore, no studies have compared the outcomes of different nailing systems used to treat subtrochanteric fractures in the same study population.

AIMS/OBJECTIVES

Our study aimed to (i) investigate the cumulative incidence and factors associated with an increased risk of re-operation in subtrochanteric fractures treated with a long intramedullary (IM) nail, (ii) compare the outcomes of subtrochanteric fractures treated with long Affixus and Gamma nails, and (iii) establish whether the addition of a proximal anti-rotation screw in the Affixus nail confers any clinical benefit.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all adult patients admitted to a level 1 trauma centre with a subtrochanteric femur fracture treated with a long cephalomedullary IM nail over an 8-year period was conducted. Exclusion criteria were primary surgery performed at another institution, prophylactic nailing because of tumours, incomplete fractures, and patients who were lost to follow-up or died before fracture healing. Data variables were assessed for normality prior to determining the use of either parametric or non-parametric tests. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify potential factors associated with re-operation. For the comparison between the two nail types, patients were matched into two groups of 119 each by age (10-year intervals), gender and mechanism of injury (low energy, high energy and pathological fractures). A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. The Kaplan-Meier nail survival curve was used to demonstrate the survival of each nail. Data were analysed using the statistical package R (R version 3.6.0).

RESULTS

A total of 309 subtrochanteric fractures were treated with a distally locked long IM nail (re-operation rate: 22.33%) over an 8-year period. Logistic regression identified six factors associated with an increased risk of re-operation, including age < 75 years old, use of a long Gamma nail, pre-injury coxa-vara femoral neck shaft angles, an immediate post-operative reduction angle of > 10° varus, deep wound infection and non-union. Following matching, we compared the two long cephalomedullary nailing systems used (Gamma versus Affixus nail). The only differences identified from the unadjusted analysis were a higher overall incidence of nail failure in Gamma nails due to any cause, re-operation, and impingement of the nail tip distally against the anterior femoral cortex. When we corrected for covariates, no significant differences remained evident between the two nails. From the Kaplan-Meier nail survival curves, however, the Affixus nail demonstrated better survivorship up to 5 years post-implantation in terms of nail failure and re-operation for all causes. Finally, the addition of a proximal anti-rotation screw in the Affixus nail did not seem to confer any benefit.

CONCLUSION

We reported a 22.3% re-operation rate in our cohort of subtrochanteric fractures treated with a long IM nail. We have identified six risk factors associated with re-operation: age < 75 years old, pre-injury femoral neck shaft angle, choice of nail, varus reduction angle, fracture-related infection and non-union. The addition of a proximal anti-rotation screw in the Affixus nail did not confer any benefit.

Intramedullary nailing of subtrochanteric fractures in elderly patients: Comparative study of helical blade cephalomedullary nail versus reconstruction nail

INTRODUCTION

Intramedullary nailing (IMN), which is a common method for treating subtrochanteric fractures, is conducted as cephalomedullary (CMN) or reconstruction (RCN) nailing. Numerous studies have reported the effectiveness of CMN, which requires a shorter surgery time and provides stronger fixation strength with blade-type devices. However, the radiographic and clinical outcomes of the use of CMN and RCN in elderly patients aged ≥65 years have not been compared yet. This study aimed to investigate whether CMN offers superior outcomes over RCN in the treatment of subtrochanteric fractures in elderly patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 60 elderly patients (17 men and 43 women; mean age: 74.9 years) diagnosed with subtrochanteric fractures and treated with IMN with helical blade CMN (CMN group: 30 patients) or RCN (RCN group: 30 patients) between January 2013 and December 2018 with at least 1 year of follow-up period. Radiologic outcomes were evaluated based on the postoperative state of alignment and the achievement and timing of bony union at the final follow-up. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Merle d'Aubigné-Postel score. Radiologic and clinical outcomes in the two groups were compared and analyzed, and the occurrence of complications was examined.

RESULTS

The difference in malalignment between the two groups was not significant; however, the RCN group achieved more effective reduction. At the final follow-up, bony union was achieved within 18.9 weeks, on average, in 28 patients in the CMN group and within 21.6 weeks, on average, in 27 patients in the RCN group. Twenty patients in the CMN group and 26 in the RCN group showed good or better results according to the Merle d'Aubigné-Postel score. No significant differences were found for any of the parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

In the treatment of difficult subtrochanteric fractures in elderly patients, RCN can provide excellent reduction and strong fixation similar to CMN and can result in outstanding clinical and radiologic outcomes.

The Clinical Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Clamp-Assisted Reduction and Open Reduction with Wire Cerclage for Unstable Subtrochanteric Fractures

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical effectiveness of minimally invasive clamp-assisted reduction and open reduction with wire cerclage and intramedullary nails for unstable subtrochanteric fractures. Between January 2016 and October 2019, 68 patients who had unstable subtrochanteric fractures experienced intramedullary nail surgery in this retrospective study. There were 41 cases in the minimally invasive clamp or closed reduction group (group A) and 27 cases in the open reduction with wire cerclage group (group B). There were 3 cases of complications in group A and 2 cases of complications in group B. Remarkable distinction was observed between the two groups in the operation time (p < 0.05), quality of reduction (p < 0.05), and union time (p < 0.05). For the successful surgical treatment of unstable femoral subtrochanteric fractures, an anatomical reduction is crucial. Reduction and wire cerclage are cut to give medial support for the anatomical reduction, which has a positive effect on fracture healing.

Management of subtrochanteric femur fractures: is open reduction associated with poor outcomes?

Purpose

The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with the need for open reduction in subtrochanteric femoral fractures and investigate the effect of cerclage wiring compared to open reduction alone, on the development of complications, especially infection and non-union.

Methods

All consecutive patients with a fracture involving the subtrochanteric region were retrospectively identified, over an 8-year period. Data documented and analysed included patient demographics, fracture characteristics, patient comorbidities, time to fracture union and development of complications.

Results

A total of 512 patients met the inclusion criteria (523 fractures). Open reduction was performed in 48% (247) of the fractures. Following matching and regression analysis, we identified diaphyseal extension of the fracture to be associated with an open reduction (OR: 2.30; 95% CI 1.45–3.65; p < 0.001). Open reduction was also associated with an increased risk of superficial infection (OR: 7.88; 95% CI 1.63–38.16; p = 0.010), transfusion within 48 h following surgery (OR: 2.44; 95% CI 1.96–4.87; p < 0.001) and a prolonged surgical time (OR: 3.09; 95% CI 1.96–4.87; p < 0.001). The risk of non-union, deep infection and overall mortality was not increased with open reduction. The use of cerclage wires [50 out of 201 fractures (24.9%) treated with an open reduction] to achieve anatomical reduction as compared to open reduction alone significantly reduced the risk of non-union (OR: 0.20; 95% CI 0.06–0.74; p = 0.015).

Conclusion

Open reduction of subtrochanteric fractures is not associated with an increased risk of deep infection and non-union, even though it is associated with an increased risk of superficial infection, prolonged surgical time and transfusion. The use of cerclage wire is associated with reduced risk of non-union with little evidence of an increase in complications.

Level of evidence

III.

Surgical Site Infection Following Intramedullary Nailing of Subtrochanteric Femoral Fractures

Aim: To investigate the incidence, risk factors and pathogenic micro-organisms causing superficial and deep infection in subtrochanteric femoral fractures managed with an intramedullary nail. Materials and Methods: Following institutional board approval, all consecutive patients presenting with a subtrochanteric fracture were retrospectively identified, over an 8-year period. Basic demographics, fracture characteristics, fracture union, revision operation, mortality and other complications were reported and analysed. Variables deemed statistically significant (p-value < 0.05) were then included into a revised adjusted model of logistic regression analysis, where we reported on the odds ratio (OR). Results: The overall incidence of infection was 6.4% (n = 36/561; superficial: 3.7%; deep: 2.7%). Associations with deep infection included: non-union (OR 9.29 (2.56–3.38)), the presence of an open fracture (OR 4.23 (3.18–5.61)), the need for massive transfusion (OR 1.42 (2.39–8.39)), post-operative transfusion (OR 1.40 (1.10–1.79)) and prolonged length of stay (OR 1.04 (1.02–1.06)). The Commonest causes of superficial infection were Staphylococcus aureus (28.5%), enteric flora (23.8%) and mixed flora (23.8%); whereas coliforms (60%) and Staphylococcus aureus (26.7%) were the commonest micro-organisms isolated in deep infection. Polymicrobial infection was identified in 38.5% and 80% of superficial and deep infections, respectively. Conclusion: Causative micro-organisms identified in both superficial and deep infection were similar to those reported in post-traumatic osteomyelitis. In an attempt to minimise infection, the treating clinician should focus on modifiable risk factors with adequate patient optimisation, prompt surgical treatment, adequate antibiotic coverage and wound care when treating patients with subtrochanteric femur fracture.

Management of Refractory Aseptic Subtrochanteric Non-union by Dual Plating

BACKGROUND

Subtrochanteric fractures are challenging to treat because of their anatomical and biomechanical behaviours. Non-unions of this region become much more difficult to treat because of the previous surgical scar, fibrosis, mal-reduction, presence of an implant, compromised soft tissue, and osseous vascularity, bone-mass loss etc. The aim is to provide a stable mechanical environment by PF-LCP, augmented by LCP (dual plating) where biology can work uneventfully. Biology is re-initiated by decortication (shingling) and autologous cancellous bone graft.

METHODS

Twelve cases of failed aseptic subtrochanteric non-union either with intact or broken implant were included in this study in a period of 3 years from August 2016 to July 2019. The interposing fibrous tissue resected in patients with mal-aligned fragments. The mechanical stabilization is achieved by orthogonal dual plating. PF-LCP on lateral and 4.5 mm LCP anteriorly, decortication, and cancellous graft applied before applying for the anterior plate. Patients were encouraged for a toe-touch walk with walking-frame from 3rd post-operative day. Functional outcomes were assessed using Parker Mobility Score (PMS).

RESULTS

All fractures united in 7 ± 1.53 months. ROM at the knee remained unchanged but improved at the hip after revision surgery. Average PMS improved to 7.58 from pre-revision 1.75 validating the efficacy of this protocol.

CONCLUSION

Adequate stability by dual-plate construct and re-initiation of cellular and biochemical processes by decortication and cancellous bone-graft reunited ununited subtrochanteric fractures. This particular combination of plates and decortication has not been employed earlier as per our review of the literature.

AIM

To offer a new paradigm for the management of surgically failed subtrochanteric non-unions.

Mortality and Medical Complications of Subtrochanteric Fracture Fixation

The aim of this study was to define the incidence and investigate the associations with mortality and medical complications, in patients presenting with subtrochanteric femoral fractures subsequently treated with an intramedullary nail, with a special reference to advancement of age. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review, covering an 8-year period, of all patients admitted to a Level 1 Trauma Centre with the diagnosis of subtrochanteric fractures was conducted. Normality was assessed for the data variables to determine the further use of parametric or non-parametric tests. Logistic regression analysis was then performed to identify the most important associations for each event. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: A total of 519 patients were included in our study (age at time of injury: 73.26 ± 19.47 years; 318 female). The average length of hospital stay was 21.4 ± 19.45 days. Mortality was 5.4% and 17.3% for 30 days and one year, respectively. Risk factors for one-year mortality included: Low albumin on admission (Odds ratio (OR) 4.82; 95% Confidence interval (95%CI) 2.08-11.19), dementia (OR 3.99; 95%CI 2.27-7.01), presence of pneumonia during hospital stay (OR 3.18; 95%CI 1.76-5.77) and Charlson comorbidity score (CCS) > 6 (OR 2.94; 95%CI 1.62-5.35). Regarding the medical complications following the operative management of subtrochanteric fractures, the overall incidence of hospital acquired pneumonia (HAP) was 18.3%. Patients with increasing CCS (CCS 6-8: OR 1.69; 95%CI 1.00-2.84/CCS > 8: OR 2.02; 95%CI 1.03-3.95), presence of asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (OR 2.29; 95%CI 1.37-3.82), intensive care unit (ICU)/high dependency unit (HDU) stay (OR 3.25; 95%CI 1.77-5.96) and a length of stay of more than 21 days (OR 8.82; 95%CI 1.18-65.80) were at increased risk of this outcome. The incidence of post-operative delirium was found to be 10.2%. This was associated with pre-existing dementia (OR 4.03; 95%CI 0.34-4.16), urinary tract infection (UTI) (OR 3.85; 95%CI 1.96-7.56), need for an increased level of care (OR 3.16; 95%CI 1.38-7.25), pneumonia (OR 2.29; 95%CI 1.14-4.62) and post-operative deterioration of renal function (OR 2.21; 95%CI 1.18-4.15). The incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) was 3.7% (pulmonary embolism (PE): 8 patients; deep venous thrombosis (DVT): 11 patients), whilst the incidence of myocardial infarction (MI)/cerebrovascular accidents (CVA) was 4.0%. No evidence of the so called "weekend effect" was identified on both morbidity and mortality. Regression analysis of these complications did not reveal any significant associations. Conclusions: Our study has opened the field for the investigation of medical complications within the subtrochanteric fracture population. Early identification of the associations of these complications could help prognostication for those who are at risk of a poor outcome. Furthermore, these could be potential "warning shots" for clinicians to act early to manage and in some cases prevent these devastating complications that could potentially lead to an increased risk of mortality.

Risk factor analysis for delayed union after subtrochanteric femur fracture: quality of reduction and valgization are the key to success

Background

Subtrochanteric femur fractures (SFF) are uncommon, but have a high complication rate concerning non-union and mechanical complications. There is ongoing discussion about risk factors for delayed fracture healing after SFF. The purpose of this study was to evaluate potential risk factors for delayed fracture healing after SFF.

Methods

This retrospective radio-morphometric case control study compares 61 patients after SFF in two groups (uncomplicated healing within 6 months postoperatively vs. delayed union) concerning radiographical properties. The patients were analyzed concerning the following parameter: Quality of the reduction according to Baumgaertner, CCD-angle, Tip-Apex Distance, leg-length shortening and fracture healing according to the RUSH Score.

Results

The mean RUSH-Score at 6 months postoperatively was 21.32(±4.57). At that point of time, only 29/61 fractures were radiographically fully consolidated (timely fracture healing) and 32 patients were rated as delayed union. The total revision rate was 9/61 (14.7%), whereof four patients required revision for symptomatic non-union of the SFF. The results of the radio-morphometric measurement showed a significant difference between both groups concerning the degree of reduction measured according to Baumgaertner (p = 0.022). The postoperative ipsilateral CCD-angle was different between the two groups (p = 0.019). After 12 months postoperatively, 48/61 (78.6%) of fractures were rated healed without any further intervention.

Conclusions

Delayed union after SFF occurs frequently. In our patient population, the quality of reduction and the postoperative CCD-angle were the key factors to avoid delayed union.

Level of evidence

Level III, Therapeutic study.

Trial registration

Clinical Trial Registry University of Regensburg Z-2018-1074-1. Registered 04. Aug 2018. https://studienanmeldung.zks-regensburg.de

Risk factors for nonunion after intramedullary nailing of subtrochanteric femoral fractures

INTRODUCTION

Nonunion is a common complication after intramedullary nailing of subtrochanteric femoral fractures. A more detailed knowledge, particularly of avoidable risk factors for subtrochanteric fracture nonunion, is thus desired to develop strategies for reducing nonunion rates. The aim of the present study therefore was to analyse a wide range of parameters as potential risk factors for nonunion after intramedullary nailing of subtrochanteric fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-four patients who sustained a subtrochanteric fracture and were treated by femoral intramedullary nailing at a single level 1 trauma centre within a 6-year period were included in this study. A total of 15 patient-related, fracture-related, surgery-related, mechanical and biological parameters were analysed as potential risk factors for nonunion. Furthermore, the accuracy of each of these parameters to predict nonunion was calculated.

RESULTS

Nonunion occurred in 17 of 74 patients (23.0%). Of the 15 potential risk factors analysed, only 3 were found to have a significant effect on the nonunion rate (p < 0.05): postoperative varus malalignment, postoperative lack of medial cortical support and autodynamisation of the nail within the first 12 weeks post-surgery. Accuracy of each of these 3 parameters to predict nonunion was > 0.70. Furthermore, the nonunion rate significantly increased with the number of risk factors (no risk factor: 2.9%, one risk factor: 23.8%, two risk factors: 52.9%, and three risk factors: 100% [Chi-square test, p = 0.001)].

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicates that intraoperative correction of varus malalignment and restoration of the medial cortical support are the most critical factors to prevent nonunion after intramedullary nailing of subtrochanteric femoral fractures. In addition, autodynamisation of the nail within the first 3 months post-surgery is a strong predictor for failure and should result in revision surgery.