Assessment of Reamer Irrigator Aspirator System (RIA) filtrate for its osteoinductive potential in a validated animal model

Comparison of reamer irrigator aspirator (RIA) suspension versus bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMC) for percutaneous treatment of long bone nonunions-A preclinical canine model

OBJECTIVE

To compare the bone healing effects of percutaneously delivered bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMC) versus reamer irrigator aspirator (RIA) suspension in a validated preclinical canine ulnar nonunion model. We hypothesized that BMC would be superior to RIA in inducing bone formation across a nonunion site after percutaneous application. The null hypothesis was that BMC and RIA would be equivalent.

METHODS

A bilateral ulnar nonunion model (n= 6; 3 matched pairs) was created. Eight weeks after segmental ulnar ostectomy, RIA from the ipsilateral femur and BMC from the proximal humerus were harvested and percutaneously administered into either the left or right ulnar defect. The same volume (3 ml) of RIA suspension and BMC were applied on each side. Eight weeks after treatment, the dogs were euthanized, and the nonunions were evaluated using radiographic, biomechanical, and histologic assessments.

RESULTS

All dogs survived for the intended study duration, formed radiographic nonunions 8 weeks after segmental ulnar ostectomy, and underwent the assigned percutaneous treatment. Radiographic and macroscopic assessments of bone healing at the defect sites revealed superior bridging-callous formation in BMC-treated nonunions. Histologic analyses revealed greater amount of bony bridging and callous formation in the BMC group. Biomechanical testing of the treated nonunions did not reveal any significant differences.

CONCLUSION

Bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMC) had important advantages over Reamer Irrigator Aspirator (RIA) suspension for percutaneous augmentation of bone healing in a validated preclinical canine ulnar nonunion model based on clinically relevant radiographic and histologic measures of bone formation.

An in vivo study to investigate an original intramedullary bone graft harvesting technology

BACKGROUND

Harvesting bone graft (BG) from the intramedullary canal to treat bone defects is largely conducted using the Reamer-Irrigator-Aspirator (RIA) system. The RIA system uses irrigation fluid during harvesting, which may result in washout of osteoinductive factors. Here, we propose a new harvesting technology dedicated to improving BG collection without the potential washout effect of osteoinductive factors associated with irrigation fluid. This novel technology involves the conceptual approach of first aspirating the bone marrow (BM) with a novel aspirator prototype, followed by reaming with standard reamers and collecting the bone chips with the aspirator (reaming-aspiration method, R-A method). The aim of this study was to assess the harvesting efficacy and osteoinductive profile of the BG harvested with RIA 2 system (RIA 2 group) compared to the novel harvesting concept (aspirator + R-A method, ARA group).

METHODS

Pre-planning computed tomography (CT) imaging was conducted on 16 sheep to determine the femoral isthmus canal diameter. In this non-recovery study, sheep were divided into two groups: RIA 2 group (n = 8) and ARA group (n = 8). We measured BG weight collected from left femur and determined femoral cortical bone volume reduction in postoperative CT imaging. Growth factor and inflammatory cytokine amounts of the BGs were quantified using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) methods.

RESULTS

The use of the stand-alone novel aspirator in BM collection, and in harvesting BG when the aspirator is used in conjunction with sequential reaming (R-A method) was proven feasible. ELISA results showed that the collected BG contained relevant amounts of growth factors and inflammatory cytokines in both the RIA 2 and the ARA group.

CONCLUSIONS

Here, we present the first results of an innovative concept for harvesting intramedullary BG. It is a prototype of a novel aspirator technology that enables the stepwise harvesting of first BM and subsequent bone chips from the intramedullary canal of long bones. Both the BG collected with the RIA 2 system and the aspirator prototype had the capacity to preserve the BG's osteoinductive microenvironment. Future in vivo studies are required to confirm the bone regenerative capacity of BG harvested with the innovative harvesting technology.

Reamer Irrigator Aspirator Versus Iliac Crest Bone Grafting and Proximal Tibial Curettage: Is There a Difference in Blood Loss and Transfusion Rates?

OBJECTIVES

To compare blood loss and transfusion rates among reamer irrigator aspirator (RIA), iliac crest bone graft (ICBG), and proximal tibial curettage (PTC) for autograft harvest.

DESIGN

Retrospective comparative study.

SETTING

Level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

The study included 139 adult patients treated between 2011 and 2018.

INTERVENTIONS

Nonunion repair of the femur or tibia using either RIA (n = 64), ICBG (n = 59), or PTC (n = 16) for autograft.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Estimated blood loss and transfusion rates.

RESULTS

Patient demographics, surgical indications, and medical comorbidities that affect bleeding did not differ among the groups. Estimated blood loss (mL) was significantly higher in the RIA group [RIA: 388 ± 368 (50-2000), ICBG: 286 ± 344 (10-2000), PTC: 196 mL ± 219 (10-700), P < 0.01]. The transfusion rate was also significantly higher in the RIA group (RIA 14%, ICBG 0%, PTC 0%, P < 0.01). The amount of graft obtained was higher in the RIA group (RIA = 48.3 mL, ICBG = 31.0 mL, PTC = 18.8 mL, P < 0.01), and the operative time (hours) was longer in the RIA group (RIA = 2.8, ICBG = 2.6, PTC = 1.9, P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Estimated blood loss and transfusion rates were significantly higher in patients undergoing RIA compared with those in patients undergoing ICBG and PTC; however, the incidence of transfusion after RIA (14%) was considerably lower than previous reports. These findings suggest that the risk of transfusion after RIA is present and clinically significant but lower than previously believed, and it is likely affected by the amount of graft obtained and complexity of the nonunion repair. The risk of transfusion should be discussed with patients and the choice of RIA carefully evaluated in patients who have anemia or risk factors of bleeding.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Autologous Bone Grafting in Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery: An Evidence-Based Narrative Review

Autologous bone grafting is common in trauma and orthopaedic surgery. Both the Reamer Irrigator Aspirator (RIA) and Iliac Crest Bone Graft (ICBG) aim to obtain autologous bone graft. Although the process of harvesting a bone graft is considered simple, complications may occur. This study examined morbidity and pain at the donor site, blood loss, and iatrogenic fractures, comparing RIA and ICBG. The source of the autologous bone graft, the alternative graft sites, and the storage modalities of the harvested bone marrow were also evaluated. In May 2021, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar were accessed, with no time constraints. RIA may produce greater blood loss, but with less morbidity and complications, making it a potential alternative source of bone grafting.

Reamer-irrigator-aspirate versus bone marrow aspirate concentrate for osteoprogenitor cell retention and osteoinductive protein release on cancellous bone

Bone defects often require operative intervention with the use of bone graft. Two sources of autologous bone graft include reamer-irrigator-aspirate (RIA) and bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMC). Osteoprogenitor cells and osteoconductive proteins have been identified in both sources. This study collected samples of these cells and proteins from a canine model and cultured them on human cancellous allograft bone blocks. Findings suggest that BMC may be preferred for indications that allow for delivery via injection, saturation of the patient's tissues, or an implanted scaffold, whereas RIA may be preferred when the biologic augment is delivered as a scaffold or graft.

In vivo studies on osteoinduction: A systematic review on animal models, implant site, and type and postimplantation investigation

Musculoskeletal diseases involving loss of tissue usually require management with bone grafts, among which autografts are still the gold standard. To overcome autograft disadvantages, the development of new scaffolds is constantly increasing, as well as the number of in vivo studies evaluating their osteoinductivity in ectopic sites. The aim of the present systematic review is to evaluate the last 10 years of osteoinduction in vivo studies. The review is focused on: (a) which type of animal model is most suitable for osteoinduction evaluation; (b) what are the most used types of scaffolds; (c) what kind of post-explant evaluation is most used. Through three websites (www.pubmed.com, www.webofknowledge.com and www.embase.com), 77 in vivo studies were included. Fifty-eight studies were conducted in small animal models (rodents) and 19 in animals of medium or large size (rabbits, dogs, goats, sheep, and minipigs). Despite the difficulty in establishing the most suitable animal model for osteoinductivity studies, small animals (in particular mice) are the most utilized. Intramuscular implantation is more frequent than subcutis, especially in large animals, and synthetic scaffolds (especially CaP ceramics) are preferred than natural ones, also in combination with cells and growth factors. Paraffin histology and histomorphometric evaluations are usually employed for postimplantation analyses.