Assessment of fracture healing in orthopaedic trauma

The predictive value of stress-induced hyperglycemia parameters for delayed healing after tibial fracture post-surgery

PURPOSE

The objective of this retrospective cohort study was to investigate the predictive value of stress-induced hyperglycemia parameters for delayed healing after tibial fracture post-surgery.

METHODS

A cohort of 108 participants who underwent surgical intervention for tibial fractures caused by trauma was included in this retrospective study. Data collected from electronic medical records encompassed demographic characteristics, bone healing assessments, stress-induced hyperglycemia parameters, inflammatory markers, and stress-related hormones. Comparative analyses, correlation analyses, univariate logistic regression analyses, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were conducted to assess the predictive value of the studied parameters.

RESULTS

The delayed healing group exhibited higher levels of fasting blood glucose, postprandial glucose, and HbA1c, as well as elevated levels of inflammatory markers and stress-related hormones compared to the normal healing group. Correlation analysis and logistic regression demonstrated positive associations between stress-induced hyperglycemia parameters, inflammatory markers, stress-related hormones, and delayed union of tibial fractures (R2: 0.183 ~ 0.403;OR: 1.091 ~ 16.332). ROC curve analysis revealed high area under the curve (AUC = 0.911) values for stress-induced hyperglycemia parameters, indicating their potential as predictive markers for delayed healing. Multivariate regression analysis further substantiated the predictive capability of stress-induced hyperglycemia parameters.

CONCLUSION

The study findings highlight the complex interplay between stress-induced hyperglycemia, inflammatory response, and bone healing outcomes in patients undergoing surgical intervention for tibial fractures. The identification of stress-induced hyperglycemia parameters as potential predictive markers for delayed healing after tibial fracture surgery offers insights for risk assessment and patient management, emphasizing the need for comprehensive understanding of these factors to optimize postoperative recovery in orthopedic patients.

Cannulated compression screws with cable technique leads to a dramatic reduction in patella fracture fixation complications compared to tension band wiring

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical, radiological and functional outcomes between cannulated compression screw with cable construct (CS) and tension band wiring (TBW) in transverse patella fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on patients surgically treated for AO/OTA 34C1 or 34C2 transverse patella fractures with CS or TBW technique between January 2019 and January 2023. Clinical outcomes included complications related to the implant, wound and fracture at 6 months and 1 year, time to achieving full weight bearing status and early perioperative clinical outcomes. Radiological outcomes included the time to fracture heals and delayed union. Functional outcome measures using the Oxford Knee Scale, 36-short form questionnaire and the Bartlett Anterior Knee Score were assessed.

RESULTS

73 patients were treated with CS (n = 33) or TBW (n = 40). TBW had higher complication rates: 25.0% (n = 10) required implant removal, 12.5% (n = 5) had wire breakage, 12.5% (n = 5) experienced fracture displacement while 52.5% (n = 21) experienced implant migration. In contrast, no CS patients had implant removals, wire breakage or fracture displacement and 3.0% (n = 1) experienced implant migration. At 1 day post-operatively, 87.9% (n = 29) CS group patients were able to ambulate as compared to the 55.0% (n = 22) of TBW patients. Furthermore, CS patients ambulated further distances at 11.8 ± 10.6 m than the TBW group (6.4 ± 7.4 m). The CS group (25.9 ± 24.6 days) also achieved full weight bearing status faster than the TBW group (43.6 ± 39.4 days). The time taken for the fracture to heal and functional outcomes were comparable among the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The CS technique demonstrated lower complications, in particular, no CS patient had implant removals, wire migration or fracture displacement. Additionally, CS technique showed a faster return to ambulation and time to achieving full weight bearing status.

Longitudinal CT-based finite element analyses provide objective fracture healing measures in an ovine tibia model

Measuring the healing status of a bone fracture is important to determine the clinical care a patient receives. Implantable devices can directly and continuously assess the healing status of fracture fixation constructs, while subject-specific virtual biomechanical tests can noninvasively determine callus structural integrity at single time points. Despite their potential for objectification, both methods are not yet integrated into clinical practice with further evidence of their benefits required. This study correlated continuous data from an implantable sensor assessing healing status through implant load monitoring with computer tomography (CT) based longitudinal finite element (FE) simulations in a large animal model. Eight sheep were part of a previous preclinical study utilizing a tibial osteotomy model and equipped with such a sensor. Sensor signal was collected over several months, and CT scans were acquired at six interim time points. For each scan, two FE analyses were performed: a virtual torsional rigidity test of the bone and a model of the bone-implant construct with the sensor. The longitudinal simulation results were compared to the sensor data at corresponding time points and a cohort-specific empirical healing rule was employed. Healing status predicted by both in silico simulations correlated significantly with the sensor data at corresponding time points and correctly identified a delayed and a nonunion in the cohort. The methodology is readily translatable with the potential to be applied to further preclinical or clinical cohorts to find generalizable healing criteria. Virtual mechanical tests can objectively measure fracture healing progressing using longitudinal CT scans.

Methods to accelerate fracture healing - a narrative review from a clinical perspective

Bone regeneration is a complex pathophysiological process determined by molecular, cellular, and biomechanical factors, including immune cells and growth factors. Fracture healing usually takes several weeks to months, during which patients are frequently immobilized and unable to work. As immobilization is associated with negative health and socioeconomic effects, it would be desirable if fracture healing could be accelerated and the healing time shortened. However, interventions for this purpose are not yet part of current clinical treatment guidelines, and there has never been a comprehensive review specifically on this topic. Therefore, this narrative review provides an overview of the available clinical evidence on methods that accelerate fracture healing, with a focus on clinical applicability in healthy patients without bone disease. The most promising methods identified are the application of axial micromovement, electromagnetic stimulation with electromagnetic fields and direct electric currents, as well as the administration of growth factors and parathyroid hormone. Some interventions have been shown to reduce the healing time by up to 20 to 30%, potentially equivalent to several weeks. As a combination of methods could decrease the healing time even further than one method alone, especially if their mechanisms of action differ, clinical studies in human patients are needed to assess the individual and combined effects on healing progress. Studies are also necessary to determine the ideal settings for the interventions, i.e., optimal frequencies, intensities, and exposure times throughout the separate healing phases. More clinical research is also desirable to create an evidence base for clinical guidelines. To make it easier to conduct these investigations, the development of new methods that allow better quantification of fracture-healing progress and speed in human patients is needed.

Concepts and clinical aspects of active implants for the treatment of bone fractures

Nonunion is a complication of long bone fractures that leads to disability, morbidity and high costs. Early detection is difficult and treatment through external stimulation and revision surgery is often a lengthy process. Therefore, alternative diagnostic and therapeutic options are currently being explored, including the use of external and internal sensors. Apart from monitoring fracture stiffness and displacement directly at the fracture site, it would be desirable if an implant could also vary its stiffness and apply an intervention to promote healing, if needed. This could be achieved either by a predetermined protocol, by remote control, or even by processing data and triggering the intervention itself (self-regulated 'intelligent' or 'smart' implant). So-called active or smart materials like shape memory alloys (SMA) have opened up opportunities to build active implants. For example, implants could stimulate fracture healing by active shortening and lengthening via SMA actuator wires; by emitting pulses, waves, or electromagnetic fields. However, it remains undefined which modes of application, forces, frequencies, force directions, time durations and periods, or other stimuli such implants should ideally deliver for the best result. The present paper reviews the literature on active implants and interventions for nonunion, discusses possible mechanisms of active implants and points out where further research and development are needed to build an active implant that applies the most ideal intervention. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Early detection of delays during fracture healing and timely intervention are difficult due to limitations of the current diagnostic strategies. New diagnostic options are under evaluation, including the use of external and internal sensors. In addition, it would be desirable if an implant could actively facilitate healing ('Intelligent' or 'smart' implant). Implants could stimulate fracture healing via active shortening and lengthening; by emitting pulses, waves, or electromagnetic fields. No such implants exist to date, but new composite materials and alloys have opened up opportunities to build such active implants, and several groups across the globe are currently working on their development. The present paper is the first review on this topic to date.