1
|
Tesoriero R, Coimbra R, Biffl WL, Burlew CC, Croft CA, Fox C, Hartwell JL, Keric N, Lorenzo M, Martin MJ, Magee GA, Moore LJ, Privette AR, Schellenberg M, Schuster KM, Weinberg JA, Stein DM. Adult emergency resuscitative thoracotomy: A Western Trauma Association clinical decisions algorithm. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2024:01586154-990000000-00823. [PMID: 39451159 DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000004462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Ronald Tesoriero
- From the Department of Surgery (R.T.), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California; Comparative Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes Research Center (R.C.), Riverside University Health Systems Medical Center, Moreno Valley; Loma Linda University School of Medicine (R.C.), Loma Linda, California; Scripps Memorial Hospital La Jolla (W.L.B.), La Jolla, California; University of Colorado (C.C.B.), Aurora, Colorado; University of Florida College of Medicine (C.A.C.), Gainesville, Florida; University of Maryland School of Medicine (C.F.), Baltimore, Maryland; University of Kansas Medical Center (J.L.H.), Kansas City, Kansas; University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix (N.K.), Phoenix, Arizona; Methodist Dallas Medical Center (M.L.), Dallas, Texas; Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery (M.J.M., M.S.), Los Angeles General Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy (G.A.M.), Keck Medical Center of USC, Los Angeles, California; Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery (L.J.M.), The University of Texas McGovern Medical School - Houston Red Duke Trauma Institute, Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, Texas; Medical University of South Carolina (A.R.P.), North Charleston, South Carolina; Yale School of Medicine (K.M.S.), New Haven, Connecticut; St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center (J.A.W.), Phoenix, Arizona; and Program in Trauma (D.M.S.), University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hanif H, Fisher AD, April MD, Rizzo JA, Miskimins R, Dubose JD, Cripps MW, Schauer SG. An assessment of nationwide trends in emergency department (ED) resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) use - A trauma quality improvement program registry analysis. Am J Surg 2024; 238:115898. [PMID: 39173564 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2024] [Revised: 07/17/2024] [Accepted: 08/12/2024] [Indexed: 08/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Use of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) for temporary hemorrhage control in severe non-compressible torso trauma remains controversial, with limited data on patient selection and outcomes. This study aims to analyze the nationwide trends of its use in the emergency department (EDs). METHODS A retrospective analysis of the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (ACS-TQIP) from 2017 to 2022 was performed, focusing on REBOA placements in EDs. RESULTS The analysis included 3398 REBOA procedures. Majority patients were male (76 %) with a median age of 40 years (27-58) and injury severity score of 20 (20-41). The most common mechanism was collision (64 %), with emergency surgeries most frequently performed for pelvic trauma (14 %). Level 1 trauma centers performed 82 % of these procedures, with consistent low annual utilization (<200 facilities). Survival rates were 85 % at 1-h post-placement, decreasing significantly to 42 % by discharge. CONCLUSIONS REBOA usage in remains limited but steady, primarily occurring at level 1 trauma center EDs. While short-term survival rates are favorable, they drop significantly by the time of discharge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamza Hanif
- University of New Mexico Hospital, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
| | - Andrew D Fisher
- University of New Mexico Hospital, Albuquerque, NM, USA; Texas National Guard, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Michael D April
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Julie A Rizzo
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA; Department of Trauma, Brooke Army Medical Center, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Joseph D Dubose
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Dell School of Medicine, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Michael W Cripps
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Steven G Schauer
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA; Center for Combat and Battlefield Research (COMBAT), University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Brenner M, Zakhary B, Coimbra R, Scalea T, Moore L, Moore E, Cannon J, Spalding C, Ibrahim J, Dennis B. REBOA as an Adjunct to Resuscitation: In Reply to Joseph. J Am Coll Surg 2024; 239:206-207. [PMID: 38497574 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000001078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
|
4
|
Harting MT, Drucker NA, Austin MT, Greives MR, Cotton BA, Wang SK, Williams DP, DuBose JJ, Cox CS. Principles and Practice in Pediatric Vascular Trauma: Part 1: Scope of Problem, Team Structure, Multidisciplinary Dynamics, and Solutions. J Pediatr Surg 2024:161654. [PMID: 39181780 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.07.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2024] [Accepted: 07/25/2024] [Indexed: 08/27/2024]
Abstract
As of 2020, penetrating injuries became the leading cause of death among children and adolescents ages 1-19 in the United States. For the patients who initially survive and receive advanced medical care, vascular injuries are a significant cause of morbidity and additionally trigger notable trauma team angst. Moreover, penetrating injuries can lead to life-threatening hemorrhage and/or limb-threatening ischemia if not addressed promptly. Vascular injury management demands timely and unique expertise, particularly for pediatric patients. As the frequency of vascular injuries requiring operative management increases, it becomes clear that an ad hoc approach is not ideal. An integrated team would provide the best approach for rapid hemorrhage control and revascularization, but the structure of vascular response teams at children's hospitals is highly variable. In part 1 of this review, we will evaluate the scope and extent of the epidemic of traumatic vascular injuries in pediatric patients, review current evidence and outcomes, discuss various challenges and advantages of different team structures, and outline potential outcome targets and pediatric vascular trauma response solutions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: n/a.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew T Harting
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA; Red Duke Trauma Institute at Memorial Hermann - Texas Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA; Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Natalie A Drucker
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mary T Austin
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA; Red Duke Trauma Institute at Memorial Hermann - Texas Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Matthew R Greives
- Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bryan A Cotton
- Red Duke Trauma Institute at Memorial Hermann - Texas Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Surgery, Division of Acute Care Surgery, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - S Keisin Wang
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA; Heart and Vascular Institute, Memorial Hermann - Texas Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Derrick P Williams
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Joseph J DuBose
- Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Charles S Cox
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA; Red Duke Trauma Institute at Memorial Hermann - Texas Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA; Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
van de Voort JC, Kessel B, Borger van der Burg BLS, DuBose JJ, Hörer TM, Hoencamp R. Consensus on resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in civilian (prehospital) trauma care: A Delphi study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2024; 96:921-930. [PMID: 38227678 DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000004238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) could prevent lethal exsanguination and support cardiopulmonary resuscitation. In prehospital trauma and medical emergency settings, a small population with high mortality rates could potentially benefit from early REBOA deployment. However, its use in these situations remains highly disputed. Since publication of the first Delphi study on REBOA, in which consensus was not reached on all addressed topics, new literature has emerged. The aim of this study was to establish consensus on the use and implementation of REBOA in civilian prehospital settings for noncompressible truncal hemorrhage and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest as well as for various in-hospital settings. METHODS A Delphi study consisting of three rounds of questionnaires was conducted based on a review of recent literature. REBOA experts with different medical specialties, backgrounds, and work environments were invited for the international panel. Consensus was reached when a minimum of 75% of panelists responded to a question and at least 75% (positive) or less than 25% (negative) of these respondents agreed on the questioned subject. RESULTS Panel members reached consensus on potential (contra)indications, physiological thresholds for patient selection, the use of ultrasound and practical, and technical aspects for early femoral artery access and prehospital REBOA. CONCLUSION The international expert panel agreed that REBOA can be used in civilian prehospital settings for temporary control of noncompressible truncal hemorrhage, provided that personnel are properly trained and protocols are established. For prehospital REBOA and early femoral artery access, consensus was reached on (contra)indications, physiological thresholds and practical aspects. The panel recommends the initiation of a randomized clinical trial investigating the use of prehospital REBOA for noncompressible truncal hemorrhage. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic/Care Management; Level V.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan C van de Voort
- From the Department of Surgery (J.C.vdV., B.L.S.B.vdB., R.H.), Alrijne Hospital, Leiderdorp; Trauma Research Unit, Department of Trauma Surgery (J.C.vdV., R.H.), Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Division of General Surgery and Trauma (B.K.), Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera; Rappaport Faculty of Medicine (B.K.), Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel; Defense Healthcare Organization (B.L.S.B.vdB., R.H.), Ministry of Defense, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care (J.J.DB.), Dell School of Medicine, University of Texas, Austin, Texas; Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health (T.M.H.), and Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery (T.M.H.), Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro Hospital and University, Örebro, Sweden
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Taheri BD, Fisher AD, Eisenhauer IF, April MD, Rizzo JA, Guliani SS, Flarity KM, Cripps M, Bebarta VS, Wohlauer MV, Schauer SG. The employment of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in deployed settings. Transfusion 2024; 64 Suppl 2:S19-S26. [PMID: 38581267 DOI: 10.1111/trf.17823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2023] [Revised: 03/17/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) has been often used in place of open aortic occlusion for management of hemorrhagic shock in trauma. There is a paucity of data evaluating REBOA usage in military settings. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS We queried the Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DODTR) for all cases with at least one intervention or assessment available within the first 72 h after injury between 2007 and 2023. We used relevant procedural codes to identify the use of REBOA within the DODTR, and we used descriptive statistics to characterize its use. RESULTS We identified 17 cases of REBOA placed in combat settings from 2017 to 2019. The majority of these were placed in the operating room (76%) and in civilian patients (70%). A penetrating mechanism caused the injury in 94% of cases with predominantly the abdomen and extremities having serious injuries. All patients subsequently underwent an exploratory laparotomy after REBOA placement, with moderate numbers of patients having spleen, liver, and small bowel injuries. The majority (82%) of included patients survived to hospital discharge. DISCUSSION We describe 17 cases of REBOA within the DODTR from 2007 to 2023, adding to the limited documentation of patients undergoing REBOA in military settings. We identified patterns of injury in line with previous studies of patients undergoing REBOA in military settings. In this small sample of military casualties, we observed a high survival rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Branson D Taheri
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
- Air Education and Training Command, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton, Ohio, USA
- University of Colorado Center for Combat Medicine and Battlefield (COMBAT) Research, Aurora, Colorado, USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Andrew D Fisher
- Department of Surgery, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
- Texas Army National Guard, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Ian F Eisenhauer
- University of Colorado Center for Combat Medicine and Battlefield (COMBAT) Research, Aurora, Colorado, USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Denver Health, Denver, Colorado, USA
- Navy Medicine Leader and Professional Development Command, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Michael D April
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- 14th Field Hospital, Fort Stewart, Georgia, USA
| | - Julie A Rizzo
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- Brooke Army Medical Center, JBSA, Fort Sam Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sundeep S Guliani
- Department of Surgery, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | - Kathleen M Flarity
- University of Colorado Center for Combat Medicine and Battlefield (COMBAT) Research, Aurora, Colorado, USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Michael Cripps
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Vikhyat S Bebarta
- University of Colorado Center for Combat Medicine and Battlefield (COMBAT) Research, Aurora, Colorado, USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Max V Wohlauer
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Steven G Schauer
- University of Colorado Center for Combat Medicine and Battlefield (COMBAT) Research, Aurora, Colorado, USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
LaGrone LN, Stein D, Cribari C, Kaups K, Harris C, Miller AN, Smith B, Dutton R, Bulger E, Napolitano LM. American Association for the Surgery of Trauma/American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma: Clinical protocol for damage-control resuscitation for the adult trauma patient. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2024; 96:510-520. [PMID: 37697470 DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000004088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/13/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Damage-control resuscitation in the care of critically injured trauma patients aims to limit blood loss and prevent and treat coagulopathy by combining early definitive hemorrhage control, hypotensive resuscitation, and early and balanced use of blood products (hemostatic resuscitation) and the use of other hemostatic agents. This clinical protocol has been developed to provide evidence-based recommendations for optimal damage-control resuscitation in the care of trauma patients with hemorrhage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lacey N LaGrone
- From the Department of Surgery (D.S.), University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Surgery (L.N.L., C.C.), UCHealth, Loveland, Colorado; Department of Surgery (K.K), University of California San Francisco Fresno, San Francisco, California; Department of Surgery (C.H.), Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana; Orthopedic Surgery (A.N.M.), Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri; Department of Surgery (B.S.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; American Society of Anesthesiologists (R.D.), Anesthesia, Waco, Texas; Department of Surgery (E.B.), University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; and Department of Surgery (L.M.N.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Koh EY, Fox EE, Wade CE, Scalea TM, Fox CJ, Moore EE, Morse BC, Inaba K, Bulger EM, Meyer DE. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta and resuscitative thoracotomy are associated with similar outcomes in traumatic cardiac arrest. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2023; 95:912-917. [PMID: 37381147 PMCID: PMC10755074 DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000004094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is a minimally invasive alternative to resuscitative thoracotomy (RT) for patients with hemorrhagic shock. However, the potential benefits of this approach remain subject of debate. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of REBOA and RT for traumatic cardiac arrest. METHODS A planned secondary analysis of the United States Department of Defense-funded Emergent Truncal Hemorrhage Control study was performed. Between 2017 and 2018, a prospective observational study of noncompressible torso hemorrhage was conducted at six Level I trauma centers. Patients were dichotomized by REBOA or RT, and baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS A total of 454 patients were enrolled in the primary study, of which 72 patients were included in the secondary analysis (26 underwent REBOA and 46 underwent resuscitative thoracotomy). Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta patients were older, had a greater body mass index, and were less likely to be the victims of penetrating trauma. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta patients also had less severe abdominal injuries and more severe extremity injuries, although the overall injury severity scores were similar. There was no difference in mortality between groups (88% vs. 93%, p = 0.767). However, time to aortic occlusion was longer in REBOA patients (7 vs. 4 minutes, p = 0.001) and they required more transfusions of red blood cells (4.5 vs. 2.5 units, p = 0.007) and plasma (3 vs. 1 unit, p = 0.032) in the emergency department. After adjusted analysis, mortality remained similar between groups (RR, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-1.12, p = 0.304). CONCLUSION Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta and RT were associated with similar survival after traumatic cardiac arrest, although time to successful aortic occlusion was longer in the REBOA group. Further research is needed to better define the role of REBOA in trauma. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ezra Y. Koh
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Erin E. Fox
- Center for Translational Injury Research, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - Charles E. Wade
- Center for Translational Injury Research, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
| | - Thomas M. Scalea
- R. Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Program in Trauma, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Charles J. Fox
- Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | | | - Kenji Inaba
- Department of Surgery, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - David E. Meyer
- Center for Translational Injury Research, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chung CY, Scalea TM. Damage control surgery: old concepts and new indications. Curr Opin Crit Care 2023; 29:666-673. [PMID: 37861194 DOI: 10.1097/mcc.0000000000001097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW While the principles of damage control surgery - rapid hemorrhage and contamination control with correction of physiologic derangements followed by delayed definitive reconstruction - have remained consistent, forms of damage control intervention have evolved and proliferated dramatically. This review aims to provide a historic perspective of the early trends of damage control surgery as well as an updated understanding of its current state and future trends. RECENT FINDINGS Physiologically depleted patients in shock due to both traumatic and nontraumatic causes are often treated with damage control laparotomy and surgical principles. Damage control surgery has also been shown to be safe and effective in thoracic and orthopedic injuries. Damage control resuscitation is used in conjunction with surgical source control to restore patient physiology and prevent further collapse. The overuse of damage control laparotomy, however, is associated with increased morbidity and complications. With advancing technology, catheter- and stent-based endovascular modalities are playing a larger role in the resuscitation and definitive care of patients. SUMMARY Optimal outcome in the care of the most severely injured patients requires judicious use of damage control surgery supplemented by advancements in resuscitation and surgical adjuncts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Yvonne Chung
- R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland Medical System, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kim DH, Moon J, Chang SW, Kang BH. Early experience with resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta for unstable pelvic fractures in the Republic of Korea: a multi-institutional study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2023; 49:2495-2503. [PMID: 37277572 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-023-02293-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Recently, trauma centers in the Republic of Korea introduced resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) for application in severe pelvic fracture cases. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of REBOA and its associated factors in enhancing survival. METHODS Data from patients with severe pelvic injuries at two regional trauma centers from 2016 to 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were dichotomized into REBOA and no-REBOA groups, and patient characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared using 1:1 propensity score matching. Additional survival-based analysis was performed in the REBOA group. RESULTS REBOA was performed in 42 of the 174 patients with pelvic fractures. As patients in the REBOA group had more severe injuries than did patients in the no-REBOA group, 1:1 propensity score matching was performed to adjust for severity. After matching, 24 patients were included in each group and mortality was not significantly different (REBOA 62.5% vs. no-REBOA 41.7%, P = 0.149). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no significant differences in mortality between the two matched groups (log-rank test, P = 0.408). Among the 42 patients treated with REBOA, 14 survived. Shorter REBOA duration (63 [40-93] vs. 166 [67-193] min, P = 0.015) and higher systolic blood pressure before REBOA (65 [58-76] vs. 54 [49-69] mmHg, P = 0.035) were associated with better survival. CONCLUSIONS The effectiveness of REBOA has not been definitively established; however, it was not associated with increased mortality in this study. Additional studies are required to better understand how REBOA can be effectively used for treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong Hun Kim
- Division of Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Republic of Korea
| | - Jonghwan Moon
- Division of Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, Ajou School of Medicine, 164 Worldcup-Ro, Yeongtong-Gu, Suwon-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, 16499, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung Wook Chang
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Republic of Korea
| | - Byung Hee Kang
- Division of Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, Ajou School of Medicine, 164 Worldcup-Ro, Yeongtong-Gu, Suwon-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, 16499, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Roderick E, Ricaurte D, Croteau A, Gates J, Bass S, Jain AK, Keating J. The Implementation of a Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) Program at a Level 1 New England Trauma Center: Feasibility and Early Outcomes. Am Surg 2023; 89:5474-5479. [PMID: 36757849 DOI: 10.1177/00031348231156759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We evaluated the feasibility of implementing a Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) program at our urban level 1 trauma center and evaluated early outcomes. DESIGN A multidisciplinary committee including physicians (trauma surgery, emergency medicine, vascular surgery, and interventional radiology) and nurses created clinical practice guidelines for the placement of REBOA at our institution. All trauma surgeons and critical care board certified emergency medicine physicians were trained in placement and nurses received management training. A formal review process was implemented to identify areas for improvement. Finally, we instituted refresher training to maintain REBOA competency. Trauma patients with noncompressible torso hemorrhage from blunt or penetrating injuries who were partial or nonresponders to blood product resuscitation were included. Pregnant patients, children, or patients with significant hemothorax or suspected aortic or cardiac injury were excluded. RESULTS Over seven months, eight catheters were successfully placed, all on the first attempt, including six in Zone 3 and two in Zone 1. All Zone 3 catheters were placed for pelvic fracture-related bleeding which were subsequently embolized. The Zone 1 catheters were placed immediately preoperatively for intraabdominal bleeding. Upon committee review, one critique was made regarding zone selection. One patient developed an arteriovenous fistula after placement which resolved without intervention. There were no other complications and all patients survived to discharge. CONCLUSIONS An REBOA program is feasible and safe following a comprehensive multidisciplinary effort. The efforts described here can be utilized by similar trauma programs for adaptation of this endovascular approach to bleeding control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Daniel Ricaurte
- Department of Trauma and Critical Care, Hartford Hospital, CT, USA
| | - Alfred Croteau
- Department of Trauma and Critical Care, Hartford Hospital, CT, USA
| | - Jonathan Gates
- Department of Trauma and Critical Care, Hartford Hospital, CT, USA
| | - Stacy Bass
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Hartford Hospital, CT, USA
| | - A K Jain
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Hartford Hospital, CT, USA
| | - Jane Keating
- Department of Trauma and Critical Care, Hartford Hospital, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tisherman SA, Brenner ML. Contemporary Adjuncts to Hemorrhage Control. JAMA 2023; 330:1849-1851. [PMID: 37824165 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.16135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel A Tisherman
- Department of Surgery and the Program in Trauma, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore
| | - Megan L Brenner
- Department of Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Guan Y, Chen P, Zhou H, Hong J, Yan Y, Wang Y. Common complications and prevention strategies for resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta: A narrative review. Medicine (Baltimore) 2023; 102:e34748. [PMID: 37653766 PMCID: PMC10470747 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000034748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Revised: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is considered a key measure of treatment due to its use in stabilizing patients in shock through temporary inflow occlusion for noncompressible torso hemorrhage as well as its supportive role in myocardial and cerebral perfusion. Although its clinical efficacy in trauma has been widely recognized, concerns over related complications, such as vascular access and ischemia-reperfusion, are on the rise. This paper aims to investigate complications associated with REBOA and identify current and emerging prevention or mitigation strategies through a literature review based on human or animal data. Common complications associated with REBOA include ischemia/reperfusion injuries, vessel injuries, venous thromboembolism, and worsening proximal bleeding. REBOA treatment outcomes can be improved substantially with the help of precise selection of patients, better visualization tools, improvement in balloon catheters, blockage strategies, and medication intervention measures. Better understanding of REBOA-related complications and further research on the strategies to mitigate the occurrence of such complications will be of vital importance for the optimization of the clinical outcomes in patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Guan
- College of Pediatrics, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China
| | - Pinghao Chen
- College of Pediatrics, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China
| | - Hao Zhou
- College of Pediatrics, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China
| | - Jiaxiang Hong
- College of Pediatrics, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China
| | - Yanggang Yan
- College of Pediatrics, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China
| | - Yong Wang
- Department of Emergency, Hainan Clinical Research Center for Acute and Critical Diseases, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China
- Department of Interventional Radiology and Vascular Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Cralley AL, Moore EE, Dubose J, Brenner ML, Schaid TR, DeBot M, Cohen M, Silliman C, Fox C, Sauaia A. OUTCOMES FOLLOWING ZONE 3 AND ZONE 1 AORTIC OCCLUSION FOR THE TREATMENT OF BLUNT PELVIC INJURIES. Shock 2023; 59:685-690. [PMID: 36802216 PMCID: PMC10121845 DOI: 10.1097/shk.0000000000002098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Background: A 2021 report of the Aortic Occlusion for Resuscitation in Trauma and Acute Care Surgery multicenter registry described the outcomes of patients treated with Zone 3 resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA zone 3). Our study builds upon that report, testing the hypothesis that REBOA zone 3 is associated with better outcomes than REBOA Zone 1 in the immediate treatment of severe, blunt pelvic injuries. Methods: We included adults who underwent aortic occlusion (AO) via REBOA zone 1 or REBOA Zone 3 in the emergency department for severe, blunt pelvic injuries [Abbreviated Injury Score ≥ 3 or pelvic packing/embolization/first 24 hours] in institutions with >10 REBOAs. Adjustment for confounders was accomplished with a Cox proportional hazards model for survival, generalized estimating equations for intensive care unit (ICU)-free days (IFD) and ventilation-free days (VFD) > 0 days, and mixed linear models for continuous outcomes (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS], Glasgow Outcome Scale [GOS]), accounting for facility clustering. Results: Of 109 eligible patients, 66 (60.6%) underwent REBOA Zone 3 and 43 (39.4%) REBOA Zone 1. There were no differences in demographics, but compared with REBOA Zone 3, REBOA Zone 1 patients were more likely to be admitted to high volume centers and be more severely injured. These patients did not differ in systolic blood pressure (SBP), cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the prehospital/hospital settings, SBP at the start of AO, time to AO start, likelihood of achieving hemodynamic stability or requirement of a second AO. After controlling for confounders, compared with REBOA Zone 3, REBOA Zone 1 was associated with a significantly higher mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-2.19), but there were no differences in VFD > 0 (adjusted relative risk, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.33-1.31), IFD > 0 (adjusted relative risk, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.39-1.57), discharge GCS (adjusted difference, -1.16; 95% CI, -4.2 to 1.90) or discharge GOS (adjusted difference, -0.67; 95% CI -1.9 to 0.63). Conclusions: This study suggests that compared with REBOA Zone 1, REBOA Zone 3 provides superior survival and is not inferior regarding other adverse outcomes in patients with severe blunt pelvic injuries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexis L Cralley
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colorado
| | | | - Joseph Dubose
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Texas, Austin, Texas
| | - Megan L Brenner
- Department of Surgery, University of California Riverside School of Medicine, Moreno Valley, California
| | - Terry R Schaid
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Margot DeBot
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Mitchell Cohen
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colorado
| | | | - Charles Fox
- Department of Vascular Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Patel N, Johnson MA, Vapniarsky N, Van Brocklin MW, Williams TK, Youngquist ST, Ford R, Ewer N, Neff LP, Hoareau GL. Elamipretide mitigates ischemia-reperfusion injury in a swine model of hemorrhagic shock. Sci Rep 2023; 13:4496. [PMID: 36934127 PMCID: PMC10024723 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-31374-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/20/2023] Open
Abstract
ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) after hemorrhage is potentiated by aortic occlusion or resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA). Given the central role of mitochondrial injury in shock, we hypothesized that Elamipretide, a peptide that protects mitochondria, would mitigate IRI after hemorrhagic shock and REBOA. Twelve pigs were subjected to hemorrhagic shock and 45 min of REBOA. After 25 min of REBOA, animals received either saline or Elamipretide. Animals were transfused with autologous blood during balloon deflation, and pigs were resuscitated with isotonic crystalloids and norepinephrine for 4.25 h. Elamipretide-treated animals required less crystalloids than the controls (62.5 [50-90] and 25 [5-30] mL/kg, respectively), but similar amounts of norepinephrine (24.7 [8.6-39.3] and 9.7 [2.1-12.5] mcg/kg, respectively). Treatment animals had a significant reduction in serum creatinine (control: 2.7 [2.6-2.8]; Elamipretide: 2.4 [2.4-2.5] mg/dL; p = 0.04), troponin (control: 3.20 [2.14-5.47] ng/mL, Elamipretide: 0.22 [0.1-1.91] ng/mL; p = 0.03), and interleukin-6 concentrations at the end of the study. There were no differences in final plasma lactate concentration. Elamipretide reduced fluid requirements and protected the kidney and heart after profound IRI. Further understanding the subcellular consequences of REBOA and mitochondrial rescue will open new therapeutic avenues for patients suffering from IRI after hemorrhage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Patel
- Department of Surgery, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - M A Johnson
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - N Vapniarsky
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | - M W Van Brocklin
- Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - T K Williams
- Department of Vascular/Endovascular Surgery, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - S T Youngquist
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - R Ford
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - N Ewer
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - L P Neff
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - G L Hoareau
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
- Nora Eccles-Harrison Cardiovascular Research and Training Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Wu YT, Lewis MR, Arase M, Demetriades D. Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta is Associated with Increased Risk of Extremity Compartment Syndrome. World J Surg 2023; 47:796-802. [PMID: 36371514 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-022-06832-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) has been used as a temporizing procedure to control intra-abdominal or pelvic bleeding. Theoretically, occlusion of the aorta and the resulting ischemia-reperfusion of the lower extremities may increase the risk of extremity compartment syndrome (CS). To date, no study has addressed systematically the incidence and risk factors of CS following REBOA intervention. The purpose of this study was to address this knowledge gap. METHODS Adult trauma patients from the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (ACS-TQIP) database (2016-2019) were included. Patients who received REBOA within 4 h of admission were compared to patients without REBOA after propensity score matching for demographics, vital signs on admission, comorbidities, injury severity of different body regions, pelvic and lower extremity fractures, vascular trauma to the lower extremities, fixation for fractures, angioembolization (AE) for pelvis, preperitoneal pelvic packing (PPP), laparotomy, and venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis. The primary outcomes were rates of lower extremity CS and fasciotomy and acute kidney injury (AKI). Secondary outcomes included mortality. RESULTS There were 534 patients who received REBOA matched with 1043 patients without REBOA. Overall, patients in the REBOA group had significantly higher rates of CS than no REBOA patients [5.4% vs 1.1%, p < 0.001, OR: 5.39]. The risk of CS remained significantly higher in the subgroups of patients with or without pelvic or lower extremity fractures, as well as in the subgroup of patients with associated extremity vascular injury [11.2% vs 1.5%, p < 0.001, OR: 8.12].The fasciotomy and AKI rates were significantly higher in the REBOA group (5.8% vs 1.2%, p < 0.001 and 12.9% vs 7.4%, p< 0.001 respectively). CONCLUSION REBOA use is associated with a higher risk of lower extremity CS, fasciotomy and AKI, especially in patients with associated lower extremity vascular injuries. These complications should be taken into account when considering REBOA use, and close observation for this complication should always be part of the routine monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Tung Wu
- Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, Surgical Critical Care, LAC+USC Medical Center, University of Southern California, 2051 Marengo St, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
- Department of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan
| | - Meghan R Lewis
- Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, Surgical Critical Care, LAC+USC Medical Center, University of Southern California, 2051 Marengo St, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Miharu Arase
- Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, Surgical Critical Care, LAC+USC Medical Center, University of Southern California, 2051 Marengo St, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Demetrios Demetriades
- Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, Surgical Critical Care, LAC+USC Medical Center, University of Southern California, 2051 Marengo St, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wu YT, Nichols C, Chien CY, Lewis MR, Demetriades D. REBOA in trauma and the risk of venous thromboembolic complications: A matched-cohort study. Am J Surg 2022; 225:1091-1095. [DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.11.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Revised: 11/24/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
|
18
|
Perlman R, Breen L, Pollock GA. Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA): Looking Back, Moving Forward. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2022; 36:3439-3443. [PMID: 35659831 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2022.04.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Perlman
- Department of Anesthesiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
| | - Leah Breen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Gabriel A Pollock
- Department of Anesthesiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|