The employment of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in deployed settings

BACKGROUND

Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) has been often used in place of open aortic occlusion for management of hemorrhagic shock in trauma. There is a paucity of data evaluating REBOA usage in military settings.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We queried the Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DODTR) for all cases with at least one intervention or assessment available within the first 72 h after injury between 2007 and 2023. We used relevant procedural codes to identify the use of REBOA within the DODTR, and we used descriptive statistics to characterize its use.

RESULTS

We identified 17 cases of REBOA placed in combat settings from 2017 to 2019. The majority of these were placed in the operating room (76%) and in civilian patients (70%). A penetrating mechanism caused the injury in 94% of cases with predominantly the abdomen and extremities having serious injuries. All patients subsequently underwent an exploratory laparotomy after REBOA placement, with moderate numbers of patients having spleen, liver, and small bowel injuries. The majority (82%) of included patients survived to hospital discharge.

DISCUSSION

We describe 17 cases of REBOA within the DODTR from 2007 to 2023, adding to the limited documentation of patients undergoing REBOA in military settings. We identified patterns of injury in line with previous studies of patients undergoing REBOA in military settings. In this small sample of military casualties, we observed a high survival rate.

Advanced partial occlusion controller allows for increased precision during targeted regional optimization in a porcine model of hemorrhagic shock

BACKGROUND

Targeted regional optimization (TRO), a partial resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta strategy, may mitigate distal ischemia and extend the window of effectiveness for this adjunct. An automated device may allow greater control and precise regulation of flow past the balloon, while being less resource-intensive. The objective of this study was to assess the technical feasibility of the novel advanced partial occlusion controller (APOC) in achieving TRO at multiple distal pressures.

METHODS

Female swine (n = 48, 68.1 ± 0.7 kg) were randomized to a target distal mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 25 mm Hg, 35 mm Hg, or 45 mm Hg by either manual (MAN) or APOC regulation (n = 8 per group). Uncontrolled hemorrhage was generated by liver laceration. Targeted regional optimization was performed for 85 minutes, followed by surgical control and a 6-hour critical care phase. Proximal and distal MAP and flow rates were measured continuously.

RESULTS

At a target distal MAP of 25 mm Hg, there was no difference in the MAP attained (APOC: 26.2 ± 1.05 vs. MAN: 26.1 ± 1.78 mm Hg) but the APOC had significantly less deviance (10.9%) than manual titration (14.9%, p < 0.0001). Similarly, at a target distal MAP of 45 mm Hg, there was no difference in mean pressure (44.0 ± 0.900 mm Hg vs. 45.2 ± 1.31 mm Hg) but APOC had less deviance (9.34% vs. 11.9%, p < 0.0001). There was no difference between APOC and MAN in mean (34.6 mm Hg vs. 33.7 mm Hg) or deviance (9.95% vs. 10.4%) at a target distal MAP of 35 mm Hg, respectively. The APOC made on average 77 balloon volume adjustments per experiment compared with 29 by manual titrations.

CONCLUSION

The novel APOC consistently achieved and sustained precisely regulated TRO across all groups and demonstrated reduced deviance at the 25 mm Hg and 45 mm Hg groups compared with manual titration.