Identifying Drug Sensitivity Subnetworks with NETPHIX

Current and future directions in network biology

Summary

Network biology is an interdisciplinary field bridging computational and biological sciences that has proved pivotal in advancing the understanding of cellular functions and diseases across biological systems and scales. Although the field has been around for two decades, it remains nascent. It has witnessed rapid evolution, accompanied by emerging challenges. These stem from various factors, notably the growing complexity and volume of data together with the increased diversity of data types describing different tiers of biological organization. We discuss prevailing research directions in network biology, focusing on molecular/cellular networks but also on other biological network types such as biomedical knowledge graphs, patient similarity networks, brain networks, and social/contact networks relevant to disease spread. In more detail, we highlight areas of inference and comparison of biological networks, multimodal data integration and heterogeneous networks, higher-order network analysis, machine learning on networks, and network-based personalized medicine. Following the overview of recent breakthroughs across these five areas, we offer a perspective on future directions of network biology. Additionally, we discuss scientific communities, educational initiatives, and the importance of fostering diversity within the field. This article establishes a roadmap for an immediate and long-term vision for network biology.

Availability and implementation

Not applicable.

A deep learning model of tumor cell architecture elucidates response and resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6is) have revolutionized breast cancer therapy. However, <50% of patients have an objective response, and nearly all patients develop resistance during therapy. To elucidate the underlying mechanisms, we constructed an interpretable deep learning model of the response to palbociclib, a CDK4/6i, based on a reference map of multiprotein assemblies in cancer. The model identifies eight core assemblies that integrate rare and common alterations across 90 genes to stratify palbociclib-sensitive versus palbociclib-resistant cell lines. Predictions translate to patients and patient-derived xenografts, whereas single-gene biomarkers do not. Most predictive assemblies can be shown by CRISPR-Cas9 genetic disruption to regulate the CDK4/6i response. Validated assemblies relate to cell-cycle control, growth factor signaling and a histone regulatory complex that we show promotes S-phase entry through the activation of the histone modifiers KAT6A and TBL1XR1 and the transcription factor RUNX1. This study enables an integrated assessment of how a tumor's genetic profile modulates CDK4/6i resistance.

Cancer driver mutations: predictions and reality

Cancer cells accumulate many genetic alterations throughout their lifetime, but only a few of them drive cancer progression, termed driver mutations. Driver mutations may vary between cancer types and patients, can remain latent for a long time and become drivers at particular cancer stages, or may drive oncogenesis only in conjunction with other mutations. The high mutational, biochemical, and histological tumor heterogeneity makes driver mutation identification very challenging. In this review we summarize recent efforts to identify driver mutations in cancer and annotate their effects. We underline the success of computational methods to predict driver mutations in finding novel cancer biomarkers, including in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). We also report on the boundaries of their applicability in clinical research.

Large-scale pharmacogenomic studies and drug response prediction for personalized cancer medicine

The response rate of most anti-cancer drugs is limited because of the high heterogeneity of cancer and the complex mechanism of drug action. Personalized treatment that stratifies patients into subgroups using molecular biomarkers is promising to improve clinical benefit. With the accumulation of preclinical models and advances in computational approaches of drug response prediction, pharmacogenomics has made great success over the last 20 years and is increasingly used in the clinical practice of personalized cancer medicine. In this article, we first summarize FDA-approved pharmacogenomic biomarkers and large-scale pharmacogenomic studies of preclinical cancer models such as patient-derived cell lines, organoids, and xenografts. Furthermore, we comprehensively review the recent developments of computational methods in drug response prediction, covering network, machine learning, and deep learning technologies and strategies to evaluate immunotherapy response. In the end, we discuss challenges and propose possible solutions for further improvement.

Mutational Signatures: From Methods to Mechanisms

Mutations are the driving force of evolution, yet they underlie many diseases, in particular, cancer. They are thought to arise from a combination of stochastic errors in DNA processing, naturally occurring DNA damage (e.g., the spontaneous deamination of methylated CpG sites), replication errors, and dysregulation of DNA repair mechanisms. High-throughput sequencing has made it possible to generate large datasets to study mutational processes in health and disease. Since the emergence of the first mutational process studies in 2012, this field is gaining increasing attention and has already accumulated a host of computational approaches and biomedical applications.