Effectiveness and causes for failure of surveillance of CDKN2A-mutated melanoma families

Attitudes toward genetic testing, family planning and preimplantation genetic testing in families with a germline CDKN2A pathogenic variant

Individuals with a germline CDKN2A pathogenic variant (PV) have a highly increased life time risk of melanoma and pancreatic cancer. This cross-sectional study assessed the attitudes among toward genetic testing, family planning, and preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) in confirmed CDKN2A PV carriers and individuals with a 50% risk of the PV (at-risk carriers) using of a one-time questionnaire.A total of 537 individuals were screened for eligibility, of whom 208 of 366 (57%) confirmed carriers (56% female, median age 54 years [IQR 46-63]) and 39 of 171 (23%) at-risk carriers (59% female, median age of 26 years [IQR 22-32]) participated in the study. Primary motivations for genetic testing were to gain control over their personal and children's cancer risk, as well as increasing cancer surveillance practices. In contrast, concerns about obtaining a mortgage and life insurance were frequently cited as reasons for postponing genetic testing. Family planning decisions remained largely unaffected in both confirmed and at-risk carriers; however, the majority of confirmed carriers were still unaware of their familial or personal cancer risk when starting a family. More than 60% of the participants were unfamiliar with PGT and only a minority (19% of confirmed carriers and 10% of at-risk carriers) would be open to considering PGT as a reproductive option. This study found different attitudes toward genetic testing, family planning, and PGT among individuals affected by the CDKN2A PV. Understanding these different attitudes can help clinicians to address the complexities surrounding these issues, especially for younger individuals facing difficult decisions about the timing of genetic testing, family planning, and the potential use of assisted reproductive options.

A Japanese case of familial malignant melanoma with germline CDK4 variant incidentally diagnosed by cancer genome profiling

Familial malignant melanoma (FMM) is a hereditary tumor that is quite rare in Japan; to date, the germline CDK4 variant has scarcely been reported around the world. Thus, we report on a woman with FMM who developed salivary gland cancer, for which a germline pathogenic variant of CDK4 was incidentally identified through comprehensive genomic profiling. She had a history of multiple atypical nevi and a facial melanoma since her 30 s and multiple family histories of melanoma; however, none of her relatives were aware of its heredity. Genetic counseling and skin surveillance were performed. Precision medicine for cancer can discover this rare genetic syndrome and provides us with the opportunity to manage the health of patients and their relatives.

CDKN2A germline alterations and the relevance of genotype-phenotype associations in cancer predisposition

Although CDKN2A is well-known as a susceptibility gene for melanoma and pancreatic cancer, germline variants have also been anecdotally associated with a broader range of neoplasms including neural system tumors, head and neck squamous cell carcinomas, breast carcinomas, as well as sarcomas. The CDKN2A gene encodes for two distinct tumor suppressor proteins, p16INK4A and p14ARF, however, the independent association of germline alterations affecting these two proteins with cancer is under-appreciated. Here, we reviewed CDKN2A germline alterations reported among individuals and families with cancer in the literature, specifically addressing the cancer phenotypes in relation to the molecular consequence on p16INK4A and p14ARF. While melanoma is observed to associate with variants affecting both p16INK4A and p14ARF transcripts, it is noted that variants affecting p14ARF are more frequently observed with a heterogenous range of cancers. Finally, we reflected on the implications of this inferred genotype-phenotype association in clinical practice and proposed that clinical management of CDKN2A germline variant carriers should involve dedicated cancer genetics services, with multidisciplinary input from various healthcare professionals.

CM-Score: a validated scoring system to predict CDKN2A germline mutations in melanoma families from Northern Europe

BACKGROUND

Several factors have been reported that influence the probability of a germline CDKN2A mutation in a melanoma family. Our goal was to create a scoring system to estimate this probability, based on a set of clinical features present in the patient and his or her family.

METHODS

Five clinical features and their association with CDKN2A mutations were investigated in a training cohort of 1227 Dutch melanoma families (13.7% with CDKN2A mutation) using multivariate logistic regression. Predefined features included number of family members with melanoma and with multiple primary melanomas, median age at diagnosis and presence of pancreatic cancer or upper airway cancer in a family member. Based on these five features, a scoring system (CDKN2A Mutation(CM)-Score) was developed and subsequently validated in a combined Swedish and Dutch familial melanoma cohort (n=421 families; 9.0% with CDKN2A mutation).

RESULTS

All five features were significantly associated (p<0.05) with a CDKN2A mutation. At a CM-Score of 16 out of 49 possible points, the threshold of 10% mutation probability is approximated (9.9%; 95% CI 9.8 to 10.1). This probability further increased to >90% for families with ≥36 points. A CM-Score under 16 points was associated with a low mutation probability (≤4%). CM-Score performed well in both the training cohort (area under the curve (AUC) 0.89; 95% CI 0.86 to 0.92) and the external validation cohort (AUC 0.94; 95% CI 0.90 to 0.98).

CONCLUSION

We developed a practical scoring system to predict CDKN2A mutation status among melanoma-prone families. We suggest that CDKN2A analysis should be recommended to families with a CM-Score of ≥16 points.

Characterization of patients at high risk of melanoma in Austria

BACKGROUND

Risk of melanoma is determined by genetic and exogenous factors. Only a few studies have included both characteristics in a comprehensive multivariable analysis.

OBJECTIVES

To find determinants of patients at high risk of melanoma in Austria, including phenotype, genotype and lifestyle characteristics in comprehensive analyses.

METHODS

In total, 1668 patients with melanoma from the M3 case-control study were studied. Overall, 567 participants were sequenced for CDKN2A, 232 for CDK4, 123 for MITF encoding the variant E318K and 964 for MC1R.

RESULTS

Patients with melanoma with a positive family history (n = 190, 11·6%), multiple primary melanomas (n = 261, 15·7%) and younger age (< 50 years, n = 675, 40·5%) were defined as being at high risk. All other patients with melanoma were defined as the reference group. We found significant differences between those two groups and between the high-risk subgroups (positive family history, multiple primary melanomas and younger age). Pigmentation phenotype was associated with the high-risk group in general (childhood freckling, odds ratio 1·46, P = 0·007; blond/reddish hair colour, odds ratio 1·43, P = 0·011). Patients with a positive family history and patients with early-onset disease were similar regarding both their phenotypic characteristics and external factors. Established high-risk mutations in CDKN2A were found in cases with a positive family history (n = 12) or multiple melanomas (n = 2). Moreover, we found three patients carrying the MITF p.E318K variant, two with a CDK4 variant and seven with nonsynonymous MC1R variants with undescribed biological significance, of which four were predicted as damaging.

CONCLUSIONS

Austrian patients could represent a reservoir for novel genetic variants. Further investigation of populations in Central and Eastern Europe might reveal more novel and disease-relevant variants.

[Recommendations for genetic testing and management of individuals genetically at-risk of cutaneous melanoma]

Cutaneous melanoma is a multifactorial disease resulting from both environmental and genetic factors. Five susceptibility genes have been identified over the past years, comprising high-risk susceptibility genes (CDKN2A, CDK4, and BAP1 genes) and intermediate-risk susceptibility genes (MITF, and MC1R genes). The aim of this expert consensus was to define clinical contexts justifying genetic analyses, to describe the conduct of these analyses, and to propose surveillance recommendations. Given the regulatory constraints, it is recommended that dermatologists work in tandem with a geneticist. Genetic analysis may be prescribed when at least two episodes of histologically proven invasive cutaneous melanoma have been diagnosed before the age of 75 years in two 1st or 2nd degree relatives or in the same individual. The occurrence in the same individual or in a relative of invasive cutaneous melanoma with ocular melanoma, pancreatic cancer, renal cancer, mesothelioma or a central nervous system tumour are also indications for genetic testing. Management is based upon properly managed photoprotection and dermatological monitoring according to genetic status. Finally, depending on the mutated gene and the familial history, associated tumour risks require specific management (e.g. ocular melanoma, pancreatic cancer). Due to the rapid progress in genetics, these recommendations will need to be updated regularly.

Li-Fraumeni syndrome: cancer risk assessment and clinical management

Carriers of germline mutations in the TP53 gene, encoding the cell-cycle regulator and tumour suppressor p53, have a markedly increased risk of cancer-related morbidity and mortality during both childhood and adulthood, and thus require appropriate and effective cancer risk management. However, the predisposition of such patients to multiorgan tumorigenesis presents a specific challenge for cancer risk management programmes. Herein, we review the clinical implications of germline mutations in TP53 and the evidence for cancer screening and prevention strategies in individuals carrying such mutations, as well as examining the potential psychosocial implications of lifelong management for a ubiquitous cancer risk. In addition, we propose an evidence-based framework for the clinical management of TP53 mutation carriers and provide a platform for addressing the management of other cancer predisposition syndromes that can affect multiple organs.

Clinical and Histopathological Characteristics between Familial and Sporadic Melanoma in Barcelona, Spain

Background

About 6 to 14% of melanoma cases occur in a familial setting. Germline mutations in CDKN2A are detected in 20 to 40% of melanoma families.

Objective

To characterise the clinical and histopathological characteristics of familial melanoma thus providing more information to clinicians and contribute to the understanding of the genetic-environment interplay in the pathogenesis of melanoma.

Methods

Clinical, histological and immunohistochemical characteristics of 62 familial melanomas were compared with 127 sporadic melanomas.

Results

variables associated with familial melanoma were earlier age at diagnosis (OR 1.036; 95% CI 1.017–1.055), lower Breslow thickness (OR 1.288; 95% CI 1.013–1.683) and in situ melanomas (OR 2.645; 95% CI 1.211–5.778). Variables associated with CDKN2A mutation carriers were earlier age at diagnosis (OR 1.060; 95% CI 1.016–1.105), in situ melanomas (OR 6.961; 95% CI 1.895–25.567), the presence of multiple melanomas (OR 8.920; 95% CI 2.399–33.166) and the immunopositivity of the tumours for cytoplasmic survivin (OR 9.072; 95% CI 1.025–85.010).

Conclusions

Familial melanoma was significantly associated with the earlier age of onset, lower Breslow thickness and with a higher number of in situ melanomas; and also carriers of CDKN2A mutations were associated with a higher risk of multiple melanomas and cytoplasmic survivin immunostaining.

Surveillance of second-degree relatives from melanoma families with a CDKN2A germline mutation

BACKGROUND

Lifetime melanoma risk of mutation carriers from families with a germline mutation in the CDKN2A gene is estimated to be 67%. The necessity to include family members in a melanoma surveillance program is widely endorsed, but there is no consensus on which family members should be invited.

METHODS

In a retrospective follow-up study, we investigated the yield of surveillance of first- and second-degree relatives of melanoma and pancreatic cancer patients from 21 families with the "p16-Leiden" CDKN2A mutation. Melanoma incidence rates were compared with the general population.

RESULTS

Three-hundred and fifty-four first-degree relatives and 391 second-degree relatives were included. Forty-five first-degree relatives and 11 second-degree relatives were diagnosed with melanoma. Most (72%) of second-degree relatives diagnosed with melanoma had become a first-degree relative before diagnosis, due to the occurrence of a melanoma in a parent or sibling. Overall, melanoma incidence rate was 2.1 per 1,000 person years [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.2-3.8] in family members still being second-degree relatives at diagnosis, compared with 9.9 per 1,000 person years (95% CI, 7.4-13.3) in first-degree relatives. The standardized morbidity ratio for melanoma of second-degree relatives compared with the general population was 12.9 (95% CI, 7.2-23.4).

CONCLUSION

Second-degree relatives from families with the p16-Leiden mutation in CDKN2A have a considerably increased melanoma risk compared with the general population.

IMPACT

This study provides justification for the surveillance of second-degree relatives from families with a CDKN2A germline mutation.

Familial melanoma: clinical factors associated with germline CDKN2A mutations according to the number of patients affected by melanoma in a family

BACKGROUND

Features associated with an increased frequency of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A) mutations have been identified in families with 3 or more patients with cutaneous melanoma (CM). However, in families with 2 patients with CM, which represent the majority of familial melanoma, these factors have been rarely studied.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated association of 3 clinical features with the presence of a CDKN2A mutation in a family by extent of CM family clustering (2 vs ≥3 patients with CM among first-degree relatives in a family).

METHODS

We included 483 French families that comprised 387 families with 2 patients with CM (F2 families) and 96 families with 3 or more patients with CM (F3+ families). Three clinical factors were examined individually and in a joint analysis: median age at diagnosis younger than 50 years, and 1 or more patient in a family with multiple primary melanoma or with pancreatic cancer.

RESULTS

The frequency of CDKN2A mutations was higher in F3+ families (32%) than in F2 families (13%). Although early age at melanoma diagnosis and occurrence of multiple primary melanoma in 1 or more patient were significantly associated with the risk of a CDKN2A mutation in F2 families, early age at melanoma diagnosis and occurrence of pancreatic cancer in a family were significantly associated with CDKN2A mutations in F3+ families.

LIMITATIONS

The study was not population based.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that factors associated with CDKN2A mutations differ by extent of CM family clustering. It indicates that, in France, families with 2 patients with CM are eligible for genetic testing especially when there is an early age at CM diagnosis and/or 1 or more patients with multiple primary melanoma.

Surveillance for hereditary cancer: does the benefit outweigh the psychological burden?--A systematic review

Individuals at risk for developing hereditary cancer are offered surveillance in order to improve the prognosis. An important question is whether the benefit of surveillance outweighs the psychological burden. In this review, we evaluated all studies that investigated psychological distress and the quality of life in individuals under surveillance for hereditary cancer of the breast, ovarian, prostate, pancreas, colorectum, melanoma, and various rare syndromes such as familial adenomatous polyposis, Li-Fraumeni and Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. Thirty-two studies were identified. Surveillance for most hereditary cancers was associated with good psychological outcomes. However, surveillance of individuals at high risk for developing multiple tumors appeared to be associated with increased distress and a lower quality of life. Common factors associated with worse psychological outcomes included a personal history of cancer, female gender, having a first degree relative with cancer, negative illness perceptions and coping style. The use of a simple screening tool to identify distressed individuals is recommended.