Pigmentary changes in patients treated with targeted anticancer agents: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Microbes, macrophages, and melanin: a unifying theory of disease as exemplified by cancer

It is widely accepted that cancer mostly arises from random spontaneous mutations triggered by environmental factors. Our theory challenges the idea of the random somatic mutation theory (SMT). The SMT does not fit well with Charles Darwin's theory of evolution in that the same relatively few mutations would occur so frequently and that these mutations would lead to death rather than survival of the fittest. However, it would fit well under the theory of evolution, if we were to look at it from the vantage point of pathogens and their supporting microbial communities colonizing humans and mutating host cells for their own benefit, as it does give them an evolutionary advantage and they are capable of selecting genes to mutate and of inserting their own DNA or RNA into hosts. In this article, we provide evidence that tumors are actually complex microbial communities composed of various microorganisms living within biofilms encapsulated by a hard matrix; that these microorganisms are what cause the genetic mutations seen in cancer and control angiogenesis; that these pathogens spread by hiding in tumor cells and M2 or M2-like macrophages and other phagocytic immune cells and traveling inside them to distant sites camouflaged by platelets, which they also reprogram, and prepare the distant site for metastasis; that risk factors for cancer are sources of energy that pathogens are able to utilize; and that, in accordance with our previous unifying theory of disease, pathogens utilize melanin for energy for building and sustaining tumors and metastasis. We propose a paradigm shift in our understanding of what cancer is, and, thereby, a different trajectory for avenues of treatment and prevention.

Cabozantinib Cutaneous Toxicity-Comprehensive Review

BACKGROUND

In the context of modern cancer therapy, the management of adverse effects of systemic therapies can lead to the avoidance of underdosing and withdrawal and increases in the quality of the therapeutic act and the quality of life. This review offers an overview of the skin-related toxicities associated with Cabozantinib, a multikinase inhibitor (MKI) that is approved for treating advanced kidney cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, and medullary thyroid cancer. It covers the most common dermatological side effects, such as palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, stomatitis, hair alterations, xerosis, scrotal erythema, and subungual splinter hemorrhages. Additionally, this review includes suggested preventive strategies and management approaches based on the severity of these adverse effects.

Two cases of imatinib induced oral pigmentation affecting the palate

BACKGROUND

Medication-related oral pigmentation is a unique yet benign finding in the dental setting. As new antineoplastic agents emerge, it is likely that this documented manifestation will continue to grow.

CASE DESCRIPTION

Here, we describe two case presentations of imatinib-related hyperpigmentation of the palate. Both patients had been on imatinib, an antineoplastic agent for 10-14 years and presented with asymptomatic diffuse blue-black discoloration of the hard palate. Both cases demonstrated biopsy-proven pigment changes localized to the superficial connective tissue with evidence of melanin and hemosiderin deposits. Of note, this is a benign finding that does not require intervention.

CONCLUSION

These two cases illustrate intraoral findings associated with imatinib. Increased awareness of this side effect will enable clinicians to appropriately council patients regarding the benign nature of this process.

Drug-Induced Pigmentation: A Review

Drug-induced pigmentation (DIP) is estimated to account for 20% of all cases of acquired hyperpigmentation. Over 50 agents have been implicated, including antibiotics, antimalarials, antiretrovirals, antipsychotics, prostaglandin analogs, heavy metals, and chemotherapeutic agents. The skin, mucosal surfaces, nails, and hair can all be affected, with the color, distribution, onset, and duration of pigmentation varying between offending agents. Both a thorough physical examination and medication history are necessary to determine the offending agent. In terms of mechanism, DIP occurs most frequently through the accumulation of melanin within the dermis but also by drug accumulation, pigment synthesis, and iron deposition. Photoprotection, including applying a broad-spectrum sunscreen, wearing photoprotective clothing, and seeking shade, plays an important role in the prevention of exacerbation of DIP. Multiple lasers, including the picosecond alexandrite, Q-switched Nd:YAG, Q-switched alexandrite, and Q-switched ruby lasers, have been successful in obtaining clearance of DIP. In this review, we examine the unique characteristics of each of the inciting agents in terms of incidence, clinical presentation, time to onset and resolution, and pathogenesis.

Consensus of the Taiwanese dermatological association and Taiwan Lung Cancer Society on the prevention and management of tyrosine kinase inhibitor-related skin toxicities in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: An updated version incorporating Taiwanese treatment experience

The 2023 consensus from the Taiwanese Dermatological Association (TDA) and Taiwan Lung Cancer Society (TLCS) addresses the management of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-induced skin toxicities in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Providing a comprehensive overview, the consensus reflects recent advances in understanding causes and developmental processes of TKI-related skin toxicities. Aimed at guiding clinicians in Taiwan, the consensus integrates new treatment perspectives while incorporating experiences from local dermatology experts. Recommendations underwent a voting process, achieving consensus when 75% or more of experts agreed, leading to their inclusion. Approved by over 90% of participants, the recommended treatment algorithms for major skin toxicities offer valuable insights for clinicians managing TKI-associated effects in NSCLC patients.

Skin Hypopigmentation in Hematology Disorders

Hypopigmentation disorders pose significant diagnostic challenges in dermatology, sometimes reflecting underlying hematological conditions. This review explores the clinical presentations related to hypopigmentation in hematological disorders, focusing on vitiligo, morphea, and syndromic albinism. Vitiligo, an autoimmune disorder targeting melanocytes, involves interactions between genetic polymorphisms and immune responses, particularly regarding CD8+ T cells and IFN-γ. Drug-induced vitiligo, notably by immune checkpoint inhibitors and small-molecule targeted anticancer therapies, underscores the importance of immune dysregulation. Morphea, an inflammatory skin disorder, may signal hematological involvement, as seen in deep morphea and post-radiotherapy lesions. Syndromic albinism, linked to various genetic mutations affecting melanin production, often presents with hematologic abnormalities. Treatment approaches focus on targeting the immune pathways specific to the condition, and when that is not possible, managing symptoms. Understanding these dermatological manifestations is crucial for the timely diagnosis and management of hematological disorders.

Serpentine supravenous hyperpigmentation induced by chemotherapy: a systematic review

Serpentine supravenous hyperpigmentation (SSH) describes increased skin pigmentation that develops in the area immediately overlying the vessels through which chemotherapeutic drugs are administered. While SSH can be cosmetically distressing and there are no definitive management options, the literature is severely limited and the variations in clinical presentation, risk factors, and histopathology of SSH across patients are not well understood. We aimed to systematically summarize characteristics from current available data, and thus improve SSH awareness and management. A literature search was conducted in PubMed using specific eligibility criteria through the end of December 2022. Included articles focused on patients who experienced SSH after chemotherapy infusion. Study quality was assessed using a modified Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine quality rating scheme. Of the 41 articles identified by literature search, 24 met eligibility criteria. Two additional articles were identified through the reference sections of retrieved articles, for 26 articles total. All articles were case reports, representing 28 patients total. Locations of SSH were mostly in the forearm near the site of injection (85%), and the most common associated symptom was erythema. Histopathologic analysis was available for half of cases, the majority of which were inflammatory in nature. The most common inflammatory pattern observed was a vacuolar/lichenoid interface dermatitis. Duration of SSH ranged from days to > 1 year after the chemotherapy was stopped. Six (21%) patients were managed with topical steroids and oral vasodilators, six (21%) patients switched to central venous infusion rather than peripheral infusion, five (18%) patients received only supportive care, three (11%) patients received venous washing with chemotherapy, three (11%) patients stopped chemotherapy, and one (4%) patient reduced the chemotherapy dosage. Ten (36%) patients attained complete resolution, seven (25%) had SSH that was near resolution/fading, and three (11%) had persistent hyperpigmentation. Although SSH often spontaneously resolves once the chemotherapeutic agent is stopped, it can persist in some patients and cause significant distress. As the literature is severely limited and there are no definitive treatments, additional research using more standardized definitions and methods of assessments is necessary to improve characterization of SSH and evaluate potential interventions.

Cutaneous adverse drug reactions

Cutaneous adverse drug reactions (ADRs) represent a heterogeneous field including various clinical patterns without specific features suggesting drug causality. Maculopapular exanthema and urticaria are the most common types of cutaneous ADR. Serious cutaneous ADRs, which may cause permanent sequelae or have fatal outcome, may represent 2% of all cutaneous ADR and must be quickly identified to guide their management. These serious reactions include bullous manifestations (epidermal necrolysis i.e. Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis), drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP). Some risk factors for developing cutaneous ADRs have been identified, including immunosuppression, autoimmunity or genetic variants. All drugs can cause cutaneous ADRs, the most commonly implicated being antibiotics (especially aminopenicillins and sulfonamides), anticonvulsants, allopurinol, antineoplastic drugs, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and iodinated contrast media. Pathophysiology is related to immediate or delayed "idiosyncratic" immunologic mechanisms, i.e., usually not related to dose, and pharmacologic/toxic mechanisms, commonly dose-dependent and/or time-dependent. If an immuno-allergic mechanism is suspected, allergological explorations (including epicutaneous patch testing and/or intradermal test) are often possible to clarify drug causality, however these have a variable sensitivity according to the drug and to the ADR type. No in vivo or in vitro test can consistently confirm the drug causality. To determine the origin of a rash, a logical approach based on clinical characteristics, chronologic factors and elimination of differential diagnosis (especially infectious etiologies) is required, completed with a literature search. Reporting to pharmacovigilance system is therefore essential both to analyze drug causality at individual level, and to contribute to knowledge of the drug at population level, especially for serious cutaneous ADRs or in cases involving newly marketed drugs.

Case report: Vitiligo-like toxicity due to ribociclib during first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer: two cases of premature interruption of therapy and exceptional response

Cancer treatment-related adverse events (AEs) are sometimes associated with outcomes for cancer patients, especially with the newest therapies such as target therapy and immunotherapy. A few years ago, the first-line therapy for hormone-receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients has been deeply changed by the introduction of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors, and now, we are improving our knowledge about their AEs and significance in clinical practice. Here, we report our experience with two cases of vitiligo-like lesions that occur early during treatment with ribociclib. We tried to change the CDK4/6 inhibitor for one patient, but the skin reaction persisted. Both patients retained only the endocrine therapy alone and had an unexpected durable progression-free survival (PFS). Some data on skin toxicities, including vitiligo-like lesions by CDK4/6 inhibitors, have recently been reported in the literature, but for the first time, we highlight a possible correlation with improved survival outcomes of patients. Uncovering the etiology of this toxicity, verifying the involvement of the immune system, and demonstrating a possible positive impact in survival represent an intriguing research objective for the near future.

Durable disease control and refractory bullous pemphigoid after immune checkpoint inhibitor discontinuation in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A case report

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors deeply modified metastatic renal cell carcinoma’s management, and confront us to adverse events that we were not used to with conventional anti-cancer therapies. We report the case of a patient who received nivolumab as second-line treatment of a metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma and who developed bullous pemphigoid four years after nivolumab introduction, with persistent exacerbations even after its discontinuation.

Case presentation

A 66-year-old man was diagnosed with lung metastasis eight years after radical nephrectomy for a clear cell renal cell carcinoma. He firstly received an anti-angiogenic agent combination, and then received anti-programmed death 1 (PD1) nivolumab as second-line treatment. Nivolumab led to prolonged disease control, but after four years of exposure the patient developed skin lesions consistent with bullous pemphigoid. After seven years of nivolumab administration and perfect disease stability, nivolumab was discontinued and surveillance was proposed. Despite nivolumab discontinuation, the patient continued to develop bullous pemphigoid exacerbations. Metastatic renal cell carcinoma was still perfectly stable more than two years after immune checkpoint discontinuation with no further anti-cancer therapy.

Discussion

We report the case of a refractory bullous pemphigoid which occurred four years after nivolumab introduction and lasted despite nivolumab discontinuation, in a patient whose metastatic renal cell carcinoma is still controlled after more than two years without any anticancer treatment. This highlights the potential association between immune-related adverse events and response to immune checkpoint inhibitors, and underlines the occurrence of late-onset and long-lasting immune-related adverse events even after discontinuation of treatment, which must encourage us to remain vigilant in the long term.

A Likely Case of Abemaciclib-Induced Hyperpigmentation in a Patient With Metastatic Breast Cancer

We report a case of a 64-year-old female with a past medical history of invasive right breast adenocarcinoma presented with diffuse hyperpigmentation of her skin after admission to the hospital for an infected breast implant. She had no recollection of a similar cutaneous reaction in her past. The patient had been on a chronic regimen of anastrozole and abemaciclib for her metastatic breast cancer. A punch biopsy revealed results were highly suspicious for a drug-induced hyperpigmentation reaction. After a thorough review of the patient's current and past medication lists, it was determined that her abemaciclib was the most likely culprit of her hyperpigmentation. This case is significant because of the rarity of this possible specific cutaneous reaction to abemaciclib. The literature that exists on cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK 4/6) is minimal. And so, the importance of shedding light on its possible cutaneous side effects is not only helpful for clinician diagnosis but also essential for patients to make informed decisions. To our knowledge, there is no other published literature on likely abemaciclib-induced hyperpigmentation.

Anticancer treatments and photosensitivity

Drug‐induced photosensitivity is associated with a wide range of anticancer treatments, including conventional chemotherapeutic agents, targeted anticancer therapies, and immune checkpoint inhibitors. These dermatologic adverse events can have a major impact on the well‐being and quality of life of cancer patients, leading to dose modifications and interruption or discontinuation of anticancer treatments in severe cases. However, the heterogeneous nature of the photosensitive reactions induced by these agents, as well as the common concomitant use of other potentially photosensitizing drugs (antibiotics, voriconazole, nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs, etc.), can make the diagnosis and, therefore the prevention, of these adverse events particularly challenging. The aim of this review is to describe the most characteristic forms of photosensitivity observed in patients being treated with anticancer treatments, including phototoxicity and photoallergy, and other potentially photo‐induced manifestations such as UV recall, exaggerated sunburn reactions associated with treatment‐related vitiligo, drug‐induced cutaneous lupus erythematosus, and UV‐induced hyperpigmentation. We also discuss the photosensitive reactions recently reported with new‐generation targeted anticancer therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors and highlight the importance of continued surveillance to identify photosensitizing agents, and of educating patients on the need for preventive UVA/UVB photoprotective measures.

Vitiligo-Like Lesions in a Patient with Metastatic Breast Cancer Treated with Cyclin-Dependent Kinase (CDK) 4/6 Inhibitor: A Case Report and Literature Review

Background

Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment landscape of hormone receptor-positive (HR⁺), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2⁻) metastatic breast cancer, with an impressive efficacy and safety profile. Cytopenia is the main adverse event, which is both predictable and manageable. Here, we report a case of CDK4/6 inhibitor-induced vitiligo-like lesions. Vitiligo or vitiligo-like lesions are a rare adverse event; only a few cases are reported in the literature.

Case Presentation

A 71-year-old female patient was diagnosed initially with early-stage right breast cancer (HR⁺/HER2⁻) and was treated with breast-conserving surgery followed by chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and hormonal therapy. A few years later, she developed metastatic disease to the hilar lymph nodes, and to multiple skeletal sites, including the left scapula, left shoulder, left iliac bone, and dorsal vertebrae, for which she was treated with ribociclib and letrozole. While on treatment, she developed hypopigmented lesions involving both hands, feet, and face, which were described as vitiligo-like lesions.

Conclusion

CDK4/6 inhibitor-induced vitiligo is a rare and unpredictable adverse event. This case report highlights the rarity of this adverse event, the dilemma related to the optimal treatment, and decisions related to continuation, holding, or switching CDK4/6 inhibitors.

Unlocking the Mechanisms of Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions: Activation of the Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/Protein Kinase B Pathway by EGFR Inhibitors Triggers Keratinocyte Differentiation and Polarization of Epidermal Immune Responses

EGFR inhibitors used in oncology therapy modify the keratinocyte differentiation processes, impairing proper skin barrier formation and leading to cutaneous adverse drug reactions. To uncover the molecular signatures associated with cutaneous adverse drug reactions, we applied phosphoproteomic and transcriptomic assays on reconstructed human epidermis tissues exposed to a therapeutically relevant concentration of afatinib, a second-generation EGFR inhibitor. After drug exposure, we observed activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B pathway associated with an increased expression of gene families involved in keratinocyte differentiation, senescence, oxidative stress, and alterations in the epidermal immune-related markers. Furthermore, our results show that afatinib may interfere with vitamin D3 metabolism, acting via CYP27A1 and CYP24A1 to regulate calcium concentration through the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B pathway. Consequently, basal layer keratinocytes switch from a pro-proliferating to a prodifferentiative program, characterized by upregulation of biomarkers associated with increased keratinization, cornification, T helper type 2 response, and decreased innate immunity. Such effects may increase skin susceptibility to cutaneous penetration of irritants and pathogens. Taken together, these findings demonstrate a molecular mechanism of EGFR inhibitor–induced cutaneous adverse drug reactions.

Pembrolizumab-induced follicular eruption and response to isotretinoin

Background: Pembrolizumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting PD-1. Folliculitis secondary to pembrolizumab has rarely been reported in the treatment of malignant melanoma. Case: A 49-year-old with a history of mild lower limb folliculitis developed metastatic malignant melanoma, and immunotherapy with pembrolizumab was initiated. Following 19 doses of pembrolizumab, a folliculocentric pustular eruption developed on the lower legs. Biopsy was consistent with folliculitis. Treatment with topical corticosteroids, high-dose prednisolone, lymecycline, clarithromycin, trimethoprim and clindamycin was unsuccessful. Pembrolizumab was stopped after 22 cycles, but the folliculitis persisted. Oral isotretinoin was required for disease control. Discussion: Drug-induced follicular eruptions have rarely been described with anti PD-1 therapy. Isotretinoin may be required to achieve remission.

Diverse landscape of dermatologic toxicities from small-molecule inhibitor cancer therapy

BACKGROUND

Advances in molecular biology and genetics have contributed to breakthrough treatments directed at specific pathways associated with the development of cancer. Small-molecule inhibitors (Nibs) aimed at a variety of cellular pathways have been efficacious; however, they are associated with significant dermatologic toxicities.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive review of dermatologic toxicities associated with Nibs categorized into the following five groups: (a) mitogen-activated protein kinase; (b) growth factor/multi-tyrosine kinase; (c) cell division/DNA repair; (d) signaling associated with myeloproliferative neoplasms; and (e) other signaling pathways. Prospective phase I, II, or III clinical trials, retrospective literature reviews, systematic reviews/meta-analyses, and case reviews/reports were included for analysis.

RESULTS

Dermatologic toxicities reviewed were associated with every class of Nibs and ranged from mild to severe or life-threatening adverse skin reactions. Inflammatory reactions manifesting as maculopapular, papulopustular/acneiform, and eczematous lesions were frequent types of dermatologic toxicities seen with Nibs. Squamous cell carcinoma with keratoacanthoma-like features was associated with a subset of Nibs. Substantial overlap in dermatologic toxicities was found between Nibs.

CONCLUSIONS

Dermatologic toxicities from Nibs are diverse and may overlap between classes of Nibs. Recognition of the various types of toxicities from Nibs is critical for patient care in the era of "oncodermatology/dermatopathology."

Assessing the compliance of systematic review articles published in leading dermatology journals with the PRISMA statement guidelines: A systematic review

Background

Reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses is of critical importance in dermatology because of their key role in informing health care decisions.

Objective

To assess the compliance of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in leading dermatology journals with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement guidelines.

Methods

This review was carried out in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Included studies were reviews published across 6 years in the top 4 highest-impact-factor dermatology journals of 2017. Records and full texts were screened independently. Data analysis was conducted with univariate multivariable linear regression. The primary outcome was to assess the compliance of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in leading dermatology journals with the PRISMA statement.

Results

A total of 166 studies were included and mean PRISMA compliance across all articles was 73%. Compliance significantly improved over time (β = .016; P = <.001). The worst reported checklist item was item 5 (reporting on protocol existence), with a compliance of 15% of articles.

Conclusion

PRISMA compliance within leading dermatology journals could be improved; however, it is steadily improving.

Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immune checkpoint inhibitor-related adverse events

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are the standard of care for the treatment of several cancers. While these immunotherapies have improved patient outcomes in many clinical settings, they bring accompanying risks of toxicity, specifically immune-related adverse events (irAEs). There is a need for clear, effective guidelines for the management of irAEs during ICI treatment, motivating the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) to convene an expert panel to develop a clinical practice guideline. The panel discussed the recognition and management of single and combination ICI irAEs and ultimately developed evidence- and consensus-based recommendations to assist medical professionals in clinical decision-making and to improve outcomes for patients.

Dermatologic Adverse Events of Systemic Anticancer Therapies: Cytotoxic Chemotherapy, Targeted Therapy, and Immunotherapy

Over the past 2 decades, rapid advancement in systemic anticancer therapeutics has led to astounding improvement in survival rates of patients with cancer. However, this celebrated progress has brought with it an evolving spectrum of drug toxicities that limit their prodigious capabilities. Cutaneous adverse events are of the most frequent of these toxicities, with substantial impact on quality of life and commonly resulting in dose reduction or change in therapy. Thus, familiarity with the array of dermatologic manifestations caused by these drugs is prudent for patient treatment. As such, the advent of dedicated oncodermatologists, and their introduction into multidisciplinary cancer care, has been crucial in optimizing treatment through therapeutic achievement and overall well-being. This review will address the epidemiology, clinical presentations, and management strategies of the major dermatologic adverse events of systemic anticancer agents, including cytotoxic chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy.

Cutaneous Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Dermatology Perspective on Management

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have proven to be efficacious for a broad spectrum of solid organ malignancies. These monoclonal antibodies lead to cytotoxic T-cell activation and subsequent elimination of cancer cells. However, they can also lead to immune intolerance and immune-related adverse event (irAEs) that are new and specific to these therapies. Cutaneous irAEs are the most common, arising in up to 34% of patients on PD-1 inhibitors and 43% to 45% on CTLA-4 inhibitors. The most common skin manifestations include maculopapular eruption, pruritus, and vitiligo-like lesions. A grading system has been proposed, which guides management of cutaneous manifestations based on the percent body surface area (BSA) involved. Cutaneous irAEs may prompt clinicians to reduce drug doses, add systemic steroids to the regiment, and/or discontinue lifesaving immunotherapy. Thus, the goal is for early identification and concurrent management to minimize treatment interruptions. We emphasize here that the severity of the reaction should not be graded based on BSA involvement alone, but rather on the nature of the primary cutaneous pathology. For instance, maculopapular eruptions rarely affect <30% BSA and can often be managed conservatively with skin-directed therapies, while Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) affecting even 5% BSA should be managed aggressively and the immunotherapy should be discontinued at once. There is limited literature available on the management of the cutaneous irAEs and most studies present anecdotal evidence. We review the management strategies and provide recommendations for psoriatic, immunobullous, maculopapular, lichenoid, acantholytic eruptions, vitiligo, alopecias, vasculitides, SJS/toxic epidermal necrolysis, and other related skin toxicities.

Medication-Induced Oral Hyperpigmentation: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Medication-induced oral hyperpigmentation is an oral condition that impacts patients' quality of life and has been linked to many systemic therapeutic agents. The exact pathogenesis of tissue pigmentation varies greatly and is not completely known. This systematic review aimed to present data on the causal association between medications and the development of oral/mucosal pigmentation as an adverse drug reaction.

METHODS

A systematic review and analysis of literature were conducted using the following databases: PubMed, Science Direct, ProQuest, Web of Science, and Scopus. The systematic review included original articles written in English and published between January 1982 and June 2020. Following the PRISMA statement, eligible articles were systematically reviewed, and data were extracted from eligible studies and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 235 articles were identified, of which 57 met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. The mean age of included patients was 46.2±16.38 years (range: 10-90 years) with a male to female ratio of 1:1.45. Oral mucosal hyperpigmentation was reported following the use of several classes of medications such as antiviral (eg, zidovudine), antibiotic (eg, minocycline), antimalarial (eg, chloroquine), anti-fungal (eg, ketoconazole), antileprotic (eg, clofazimine), antihypertensive (eg, amlodipine), chemotherapeutic, and antineoplastic drugs. The risk of developing oral pigmentation was significantly higher with antimalarial medications, antibiotics, antineoplastic and chemotherapeutic agents. Medication-induced oral hyperpigmentation was most frequent among women and in the hard palate.

CONCLUSION

Future research is warranted to better understand the pathogenesis and risk factors for medication-induced oral hyperpigmentation in order to reassure patients during prescription and management.

Balancing Cancer Immunotherapy Efficacy and Toxicity

Anti-programmed cell death-1 receptor/programmed cell death-1 receptor ligand-directed therapies are transforming cancer care, with durable antitumor responses observed in multiple cancer types. Toxicities arising from therapy are autoimmune in nature and may affect essentially any organ system. The immunologic basis of such toxities is complex, with contributions from T-cell activation and autoantibody generation. Although less recognized, hypersensitivity reactions are also possible. Although most toxicities resolve with systemic corticosteroids, some require second-line immunosuppression. Furthermore, the safety of drug rechallenge is not well characterized, with variable rates of toxicity flares arising with re-exposure. Herein, we review toxicities of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies, particularly focusing on issues that allergists/immunologists may clinically encounter, including interstitial nephritis, skin toxicity, and risks associated with immunotherapy rechallenge.

Vitiligo-like lesions in patients with advanced breast cancer treated with cycline-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitors

PURPOSE

Introduction of cyclin-dependent inhibitors was a milestone in therapeutics for patients with estrogen receptor+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer. Despite the wide use of such agents and remarkable improvement of survival rates, drug-related adverse events are not yet fully characterized. We describe vitiligo-like lesions as a new adverse event occurring in patients with advanced breast cancer treated with cyclin-dependent inhibitors.

METHODS

We performed an international retrospective study including patients with advanced breast cancer who developed vitiligo-like lesions during treatment with cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitors, in the period January 2018-December 2019. Patients > 18 years, both males and females, were recruited at six Dermatology Departments located in Italy (3), France (1) and Greece (2). We evaluated epidemiological and clinical characteristics, impact on quality of life and outcome of vitiligo-like lesions in patients treated with cyclin-dependent 4 and 6 inhibitors. The percentage of skin involved by vitiligo-like lesions was assessed using the Body Surface Area (BSA) score. Changes in patients' quality of life were investigated through the evaluation of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) questionnaire.

RESULTS

Sixteen women (median age: 62.5 years; range 40-79 years) treated with cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitors for advanced breast cancer presented with vitiligo-like lesions during follow-up visits. Cutaneous lesions consisted of white, irregular macules and patches located mainly on sun-exposed areas in 11/16 patients or diffuse to the entire body surface in 5/16. Cutaneous lesions clearly impaired the quality of life of patients tested (DLQI ≥ 10).

CONCLUSIONS

We present for the first time, to our knowledge, a case series of vitiligo-like lesions developing in patients with advanced breast cancer treated with cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitors. We showed that such lesions further impair the patients' quality of life and their treatment is challenging.

Restorative oncodermatology: Diagnosis and management of dermatologic sequelae from cancer therapies

The long-term survival of patients with cancer has risen dramatically during the last few decades. Despite this remarkable success, the same treatments that have enabled cure or remission often secondarily affect the skin, hair, and nails. Conditions including scarring, striae distensae, persistent alopecia, pigmentary changes, nail alterations, chronic radiation dermatitis, and radiation fibrosis have been associated with anxiety, depression, decreased quality of life, and impaired function. These dermatologic changes are cosmetically disfiguring, may limit activities, and are a visual reminder of past illness. Interventions toward improving these untoward sequelae and restoring the appearance and function of skin and appendages are critical for normalization and may contribute to improved quality of life in cancer survivors. Here, we outline dermatologic sequelae of cancer therapies with a review of medical and procedural treatment strategies to restore dermatologic health in the survivorship population.

Adverse cutaneous reactions to chemotherapeutic drugs

Drug reactions resulting from chemotherapy agents are common and frequently affect the skin. Although often benign, a select few of these cutaneous reactions may necessitate immediate changes to the antineoplastic regimens. Given the diversity of chemotherapeutic skin reactions and their complex implications on patient management, an organized conceptual schema is imperative for proper patient care. We evaluate a number of commonly seen chemotherapy-induced skin toxicities organized by pathogenic mechanism and drug class, providing a framework for the identification and categorization of adverse events to prevent unrecognition. Groupings of these reactions include direct cytotoxicity and/or drug accumulation, immunologic hypersensitivity, and aberrant molecular signaling.

Management of immune-related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients: a patient-centred approach

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment. The number of indications is increasing and antibodies targeting the CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1 pathways are now also prescribed in adjuvant settings and for metastatic cancer. However, ICIs reactivate autoreactive immune cells as well as tumour-specific T cells, which lead to immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in around 70% of treated patients. Although all organs can potentially be involved, the skin, gut, thyroid, lungs, liver, and joints are most frequently affected. Most irAEs occur in the first few months of treatment but late-onset toxicity-even after the ICI has been discontinued-is also possible. In terms of severity, most irAEs are grade 1-2. Some irAEs (especially myocarditis, pneumonitis, and encephalitis) are potentially fatal; in patients with highly suggestive clinical signs, treatment should be initiated before the diagnostic work-up has been completed. When confronted with an unexpected clinical sign, the physician must differentiate rapidly between an irAE, cancer progression, and another (unrelated) cause. The management of irAEs is based on the temporary or permanent discontinuation of the ICI and (for grade ≥ 2 events) the administration of steroids.

Toxicités dermatologiques après prise en charge d’un cancer du sein : intérêt d’une cure thermale en soins oncologiques de support

Dermatological toxicities (affecting the skin, mucous membranes, nails or hair) are frequently associated with cancer treatments. They can represent a real burden for patients, with physical, social and psychological repercussions. These dermatological adverse events can also persist long after the treatment has ended, especially after treatment with cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents such as taxanes. There is a clear need for the development of suitable supportive care measures to help manage these toxicities. The place of a hydrotherapy treatment in this context remains to be clarified. This article summarizes the main data available on the quality of life, and more specifically the dermatological quality of life, of patients for whom hydrotherapy was proposed after breast cancer. © 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Dermatologic conditions in women receiving systemic cancer therapy

As advances in cancer therapies have improved cancer-related survival, novel therapeutics have also introduced a variety of dermatologic toxicities, and an increased number of patients are living with these sequalae. Women with cancer in particular experience a spectrum of dermatologic conditions that affect their skin, hair, nail, and mucosal surfaces. Studies have shown that these toxic effects can significantly affect quality of life and alter a woman's self-image, cultural identity, femininity, sexuality, and mental health. In severe instances, dermatologic toxicities may even disrupt cancer therapy and can therefore affect overall survival and treatment response. In this article, we review the dermatologic adverse effects from traditional chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and endocrine therapy that disproportionately affect women. The timely diagnosis and management of these dermatologic conditions is crucial in the multidisciplinary care of women with cancer.

Hand Foot Syndrome Has the Strongest Impact on QOL in Skin Toxicities of Chemotherapy

Background: Chemotherapy often results in dermatologic toxicities, which decrease quality of life (QOL) of cancer patients. These adverse skin reactions sometimes happen simultaneously. Though previous reports have demonstrated that skin reactions influence QOL, those reports were focused on only one kind of skin toxicity or on the most serious skin toxicity. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the contribution of each skin toxicity to QOL.

Methods: This is a cross-sectional study at Kinki Central Hospital. Patients were enrolled who underwent skin toxic chemotherapy from April 1 to June 30, 2017. DLQI and Skindex29 were used to grade the QOL of patients. Also, the severity of skin toxicities was evaluated based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE ver4.0). We investigated how QOL changed with patient demographic and clinical characteristics, the worst skin toxicity grade, and each skin toxicity using statistical analyses.

Results: No significant differences were detected between QOL scores (total score of DLQI, emotions domain, symptoms domain, functioning domain and total score of Skindex29) and patient demographic and clinical characteristics (P values were 0.155, 0.086, 0.052, 0.312 and 0.114, respectively). There were statistically significant QOL differences among the grades of the worst skin toxicity (P values were <0.001). Xerosis, paronycia, pigmentation, and hand foot syndrome showed statistically significant associations with some QOL domains analyzed by multiple logistic regression analyses adjusted by demographic characteristics. When adjusted by both demographic characteristics and other skin toxicities, three of xerosis, paronycia, and pigmentation showed no statistically significant associations, but hand foot syndrome showed statistically significant associations in all subdomains and total score of Skindex29 (P values were <0.05).

Conclusions: Hand foot syndrome was a stronger factor in decreasing QOL than xerosis, paronychia, pigmentation, or rash. Therefore, especially in hand foot syndrome, prevention, early detection, and daily medical care are necessary to maintain QOL.

Pigmentation Disorders in the Elderly

Aging skin is subject to morphological change due to both intrinsic (skin tone, genetics, endogenous hormones) and extrinsic (chronic sun exposure, medications, exogenous pigments) factors. The broad spectrum of transformation includes both hypo- and hyperpigmentation. Although cutaneous pigmentary disorders are common in younger individuals, certain disorders are more prevalent in the geriatric population. This article reviews the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical appearance, treatment, and prognosis of pigmentary lesions that are predominant in the elderly.

Retrospective Analysis of Skin Toxicity in Patients under Anti-EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: Our Experience in Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND:

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been introduced for the treatment of lung cancer, improving progression-free survival, objective response rate, and quality of life. However, TKIs can lead to cutaneous toxicities, including papulopustular rash, xerosis, paronychia with/without pyogenic granulomas, scalp disorders, facial hair and/or eyelash growth.

AIM:

In this study, we describe retrospectively all cases of mucocutaneous side effects in patients with lung cancer under TKIs referring to our outpatient for the skin care of oncological patients.

METHODS:

We included patients referring from January 2016 to January 2018 affected by lung cancer and under TKIs. We collected data about the clinical exam, clinical photography, dermoscopy, histology and direct microscopic examination for each patient and we performed retrospectively descriptive analyses to assess whether a specific TKIs is linked significantly to particular cutaneous toxicity.

RESULTS:

The majority of skin toxicities were due to afatinib, and the most common skin reaction was rash. We selected 60 patients with skin reactions, treated by TKIs for lung cancer. The majority of skin toxicities were due to afatinib (47/102 adverse reactions) and erlotinib (39/102). The most common skin reaction was rash (63% of patients), followed by xerosis (30%) and granulomas (30%). There was no significant relationship between a specific type of cutaneous reaction and specific EGFRi except for granulomas, developed more frequently in patients under afatinib (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION:

Most of our patients (63%) developed a cutaneous rash under TKIs. Most commonly afatinib was the drug involved, although it wasn’t the most used EGFRi. Moreover, we noticed a significant correlation between afatinib therapy and appearance of granulomas.

Toxic Side Effects of Targeted Therapies and Immunotherapies Affecting the Skin, Oral Mucosa, Hair, and Nails

Targeted therapies and immunotherapies are associated with a wide range of dermatologic adverse events (dAEs) resulting from common signaling pathways involved in malignant behavior and normal homeostatic functions of the epidermis and dermis. Dermatologic toxicities include damage to the skin, oral mucosa, hair, and nails. Acneiform rash is the most common dAE, observed in 25–85% of patients treated by epidermal growth factor receptor and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase inhibitors. BRAF inhibitors mostly induce secondary skin tumors, squamous cell carcinoma and keratoacanthomas, changes in pre-existing pigmented lesions, as well as hand-foot skin reactions and maculopapular hypersensitivity-like rash. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) most frequently induce nonspecific maculopapular rash, but also eczema-like or psoriatic lesions, lichenoid dermatitis, xerosis, and pruritus. Of the oral mucosal toxicities observed with targeted therapies, oral mucositis is the most frequent with mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, followed by stomatitis associated to multikinase angiogenesis and HER inhibitors, geographic tongue, oral hyperkeratotic lesions, lichenoid reactions, and hyperpigmentation. ICIs typically induce oral lichenoid reactions and xerostomia. Targeted therapies and endocrine therapy also commonly induce alopecia, although this is still underreported with the latter. Finally, targeted therapies may damage nail folds, with paronychia and periungual pyogenic granuloma distinct from chemotherapy-induced lesions. Mild onycholysis, brittle nails, and a slower nail growth rate may also be observed. Targeted therapies and immunotherapies often profoundly diminish patients’ quality of life, which impacts treatment outcomes. Close collaboration between dermatologists and oncologists is therefore essential.

Cases from the irAE Tumor Board: A Multidisciplinary Approach to a Patient Treated with Immune Checkpoint Blockade Who Presented with a New Rash

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment paradigms for a broad spectrum of malignancies. Because immune checkpoint inhibitors rely on immune reactivation to eliminate cancer cells, they can also lead to the loss of immune tolerance and result in a wide range of phenomena called immune-related adverse events (irAEs). At our institution, the management of irAEs is based on multidisciplinary input obtained at an irAE tumor board that facilitates expedited opinions from various specialties and allows for a more uniform approach to these patients. In this article, we describe a case of a patient with metastatic urothelial carcinoma who developed a maculopapular rash while being treated with a programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitor. We then describe the approach to management of dermatologic toxicities with ICIs based on the discussion at our irAE Tumor Board. KEY POINTS: Innocuous symptoms such as pruritis or a maculopapular rash may herald potentially fatal severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs); therefore, close attention must be paid to the symptoms, history, and physical examination of all patients.Consultation with dermatology should be sought for patients with grade 3 or 4 toxicity or SCARs and prior to resumption of immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with grade 3 or higher toxicity.A multidisciplinary immune-related adverse events (irAE) tumor board can facilitate timely input and expertise from various specialties, thereby ensuring a streamlined approach to management of irAEs.

Dermatologic Reactions to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors : Skin Toxicities and Immunotherapy

The development of immune checkpoint inhibitors [monoclonal antibodies targeting cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)] represents a major breakthrough in cancer therapy. Although they present a favorable risk/benefit ratio, immune checkpoint blockade therapies have a very specific safety profile. Due to their unique mechanism of action, they entail a new spectrum of adverse events that are mostly immune related [immune-related adverse events (irAEs)], notably mediated by the triggering of cytotoxic CD4+/CD8+ T cell activation. Cutaneous toxicities appear to be one of the most prevalent irAEs, both with anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 agents or with the newly developed anti-PD-L1 agents, which corresponds to a class effect. They are observed in more than one-third of the treated patients, mainly in the form of a maculopapular rash (eczema-like spongiotic dermatitis) and pruritus. A wide range of other dermatologic manifestations can also occur, including lichenoid reactions, psoriasis, acneiform rashes, vitiligo-like lesions, autoimmune skin diseases (e.g., bullous pemphigoid, dermatomyositis, alopecia areata), sarcoidosis or nail and oral mucosal changes. In addition, the use of anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 therapies in combination is associated with the development of more frequent, more severe and earlier cutaneous irAEs compared to single agents. In most cases, these dysimmune dermatologic adverse events remain self-limiting and readily manageable. Early recognition and adequate management, however, are critical to prevent exacerbation of the lesions, to limit treatment interruption and to minimize quality of life impairment. This review describes the variable clinical and histopathologic aspects of dermatologic irAEs induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors. Appropriate treatment and counseling are also proposed, with a step-by-step approach for optimized management by both practicing oncologists and dermatologists.

[Dermatologic toxicities of immune checkpoint inhibitors]

The development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (monoclonal antibodies targeting PD-1/PD-L1 or CTLA-4) represents a significant advance in the treatment of multiple cancers. Given their particular mechanism of action, which involves triggering CD4+/CD8+ T-cell activation and proliferation, they are associated with a specific safety profile. Their adverse events are primarily immune-related, and can affect practically all organs. In this context, dermatological toxicity is the most common, though it mostly remains mild to moderate and does not require discontinuation of treatment. More than a third of patients are faced with cutaneous adverse events, usually in the form of a maculopapular rash, pruritus or vitiligo (only in patients treated for melanoma). Much more specific dermatologic disorders, however, may occur such as lichenoid reactions, induced psoriasis, sarcoidosis, auto-immune diseases (bullous pemphigoid, dermatomyositis, alopecia areata), acne-like rash, xerostomia, etc. Rigorous dermatological evaluation is thus mandatory in the case of atypical, persistent/recurrent or severe lesions. In this article, we review the incidence and spectrum of dermatologic adverse events reported with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Finally, a management algorithm is proposed.