1
|
Phiske MM, Khullar G, Padhiyar JK, Hosthota A, Chatterjee D. Direct immunofluorescence demystified: Essential insights and recent advances for dermatologists. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2024; 0:1-10. [PMID: 39152802 DOI: 10.25259/ijdvl_95_2024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 08/19/2024]
Abstract
Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) is widely used in dermatopathology for the diagnosis of autoimmune blistering diseases (AIBDs), cutaneous vasculitis, and connective tissue disorders. Although it is easy and useful to perform, it needs technical expertise and experience for proper interpretation. The yield of DIF depends on multiple factors including the adequacy, transportation, storage, processing, and interpretation of the biopsy specimen. Effective collaboration between the dermatologist and dermatopathologist along with meticulous clinico-pathological correlation is crucial for accurately interpreting DIF in the appropriate clinical context. In this narrative review of DIF in dermatology, we discuss the indications of DIF, recent updates on the selection of optimum biopsy sites, basic techniques of DIF including the classical transport medium and its alternatives, processing and staining technique, patterns in various diseases, advancements such as serration pattern analysis, and latest recommendations on the use of DIF in cutaneous disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghana Madhukar Phiske
- Department of Dermatology, Mahatma Gandhi Mission Institute of Health Sciences, Kamothe, Navi Mumbai, India
| | - Geeti Khullar
- Department of Dermatology, Lady Hardinge Medical College, Delhi, India
| | - Jignaben K Padhiyar
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Gujarat Cancer Society Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Ahmedabad, India
| | - Abhineetha Hosthota
- Department of Dermatology, The Oxford Medical College Hospital and Research Center, Bangalore, Chandra Shree, Shimoga, India
| | - Debajyoti Chatterjee
- Department of Histopathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Manuelyan K, Dragolov M, Drenovska K, Shahid M, Vassileva S. Artificial intelligence in autoimmune bullous dermatoses. Clin Dermatol 2024:S0738-081X(24)00092-0. [PMID: 38914175 DOI: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2024.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/26/2024]
Abstract
Dermatologists treating patients with autoimmune bullous dermatoses (AIBDs), as well as the patients themselves, encounter challenges at every stage of their interaction, including dermatologic and comorbidities assessment, diagnosis, prognosis evaluation, treatment, and follow-up monitoring. We summarize the current and potential future clinical applications of artificial intelligence (AI) in the field of AIBDs. Recent research and AI models have demonstrated their potential to enhance or may already be contributing to advancements in every phase of the comprehensive diagnosis and personalized treatment process in AIBDs, providing patients, clinicians, and administrators with valuable support. Image recognition AI systems might assist precise clinical diagnoses of various diseases, including AIBDs, and could offer consistent and reliable scoring of disease severity. Automated and standardized AI-assisted laboratory methods could improve the accuracy and decrease the time and cost of gold-standard tests such as direct and indirect immunofluorescence. The studies and tools discussed in this contribution, although in the early stages, might be a small precursor to a transformative shift in the way we take care of patients with chronic skin diseases, including AIBDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Manuelyan
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Medical Faculty, Trakia University, Stara Zagora, Bulgaria.
| | - Miroslav Dragolov
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Medical Faculty, Trakia University, Stara Zagora, Bulgaria; Medical Faculty, Prof. Dr. Assen Zlatarov University, Burgas, Bulgaria
| | - Kossara Drenovska
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Medical Faculty, Medical University - Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Martin Shahid
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Medical Faculty, Medical University - Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Snejina Vassileva
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Medical Faculty, Medical University - Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
van Beek N, Holtsche MM, Atefi I, Olbrich H, Schmitz MJ, Pruessmann J, Vorobyev A, Schmidt E. State-of-the-art diagnosis of autoimmune blistering diseases. Front Immunol 2024; 15:1363032. [PMID: 38903493 PMCID: PMC11187241 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1363032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Autoimmune blistering disorders (AIBDs) are a heterogeneous group of approximately a dozen entities comprising pemphigus and pemphigoid disorders and dermatitis herpetiformis. The exact diagnosis of AIBDs is critical for both prognosis and treatment and is based on the clinical appearance combined with the detection of tissue-bound and circulating autoantibodies. While blisters and erosions on the skin and/or inspectable mucosal surfaces are typical, lesions may be highly variable with erythematous, urticarial, prurigo-like, or eczematous manifestations. While direct immunofluorescence microscopy (IFM) of a perilesional biopsy is still the diagnostic gold standard, the molecular identification of the major target antigens opened novel therapeutic avenues. At present, most AIBDs can be diagnosed by the detection of autoantigen-specific serum antibodies by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or indirect IFM when the clinical picture is known. This is achieved by easily available and highly specific and sensitive assays employing recombinant immunodominant fragments of the major target antigens, i.e., desmoglein 1 (for pemphigus foliaceus), desmoglein 3 (for pemphigus vulgaris), envoplakin (for paraneoplastic pemphigus), BP180/type XVII collagen (for bullous pemphigoid, pemphigoid gestationis, and mucous membrane pemphigoid), laminin 332 (for mucous membrane pemphigoid), laminin β4 (for anti-p200 pemphigoid), type VII collagen (for epidermolysis bullosa acquisita and mucous membrane pemphigoid), and transglutaminase 3 (for dermatitis herpetiformis). Indirect IFM on tissue substrates and in-house ELISA and immunoblot tests are required to detect autoantibodies in some AIBD patients including those with linear IgA disease. Here, a straightforward modern approach to diagnosing AIBDs is presented including diagnostic criteria according to national and international guidelines supplemented by long-term in-house expertise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina van Beek
- Department of Dermatology, Allergology and Venerology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Maike M. Holtsche
- Department of Dermatology, Allergology and Venerology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Ingeborg Atefi
- Department of Dermatology, Allergology and Venerology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Henning Olbrich
- Department of Dermatology, Allergology and Venerology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Marie J. Schmitz
- Department of Dermatology, Allergology and Venerology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Jasper Pruessmann
- Department of Dermatology, Allergology and Venerology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Artem Vorobyev
- Department of Dermatology, Allergology and Venerology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Enno Schmidt
- Department of Dermatology, Allergology and Venerology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
- Lübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sood R, Chatterjee D, De D, Nahar Saikia U, Mahajan R, Handa S, Dass Radotra B. Accuracy of serration pattern analysis by direct immunofluorescence in subepidermal autoimmune blistering diseases. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2023; 0:1-6. [PMID: 37609723 DOI: 10.25259/ijdvl_20_2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
Background Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) is essential for the diagnosis of sub-epidermal immunobullous diseases (SIBD). Bullous pemphigoid (BP), a sub-epidermal immunobullous disease, shows linear IgG and C3 deposition along the dermo-epidermal junction by DIF. However, similar histological and DIF findings are also seen in epidermolysis bullosa acquisita (EBA). High-power examination of antibody deposition by DIF in a "u" or "n" serrated pattern can help differentiate these two entities. Aims/Objectives The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of serration patterns in IgG-mediated sub-epidermal immunobullous disease. Methods All cases of IgG-mediated sub-epidermal immunobullous disease diagnosed over the past 2 years and 9 months period and confirmed serologically, were included. Examination of the serration pattern in DIF was assessed on oil emersion. Salt split skin indirect immunofluorescence (SSS IIF), BP180 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), profile ELISA and BIOCHIP mosaic were performed, wherever available. Results This study included 74 cases of bullous pemphigoid, eight cases of mucus membrane pemphigoid (MMP) and one case of epidermolysis bullosa acquisita. The characteristic zigzag "n" pattern was visualised in 66 out of 82 cases (80.5%) of the pemphigoid group (BP + MMP); the single epidermolysis bullosa acquisita case showed the "u" serrated pattern. No statistical correlation was seen between serration pattern and BP180 positivity by ELISA (P = 0.05). Limitations The study is limited by the single case of epidermolysis bullosa acquisita (which could be due to rarity of this disease in north Indian population due to genetic variation), lack of detailed serological investigations and immunoblot in all cases. Conclusion Serration pattern analysis is an easy-to-interpret and highly useful technique for characterisation of sub-epidermal immunobullous diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ridhi Sood
- Department of Histopathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Debajyoti Chatterjee
- Department of Histopathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Dipankar De
- Department of Dermatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Uma Nahar Saikia
- Department of Histopathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Rahul Mahajan
- Department of Dermatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Sanjeev Handa
- Department of Dermatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Bishan Dass Radotra
- Department of Histopathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Giang J, van Doorn MBA, Diercks GFH, de Cordoba SR, van den Bosch TPP, Schreurs MWJ, Poppelaars F, Damman J. Successful pharmacological intervention at different levels of the complement system in an in vitro complement fixation model for bullous pemphigoid. Exp Dermatol 2023; 32:632-640. [PMID: 36704908 DOI: 10.1111/exd.14755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Revised: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is characterized by deposition of immunoglobulins and complement along the epidermal basement membrane (BM). In humans, there is a lack of functional studies targeting the complement system (CS). This study investigates activation of all complement pathways in BP skin biopsies. Moreover, pharmacological inhibition at different levels of the CS was investigated using anti-complement compounds in a complement fixation BP assay. In this retrospective study, 21 frozen biopsies from BP patients were stained by direct immunofluorescence for C1q, MBL, ficolin-2, C4d, properdin, C3c and C5b-9. Sera from 10 patients were analysed in a complement fixation assay in the presence of C1 inhibitor, anti-factor B monoclonal antibody (mAb), anti-C3 mAb and anti-C5 mAb and compared with dexamethasone. The two readouts were the quantity of complement deposited along the BM and the release of sC5b-9 in the supernatant. Our results show classical and alternative complement pathway activation in BP skin biopsies, but could not demonstrate significant lectin pathway activation. In contrast to dexamethasone, complement deposition along the BM could be selectively inhibited by anti-C1 and anti- factor B. More downstream, selective intervention at the level of C3 and C5 could effectively reduce complement deposition along the BM and the release of sC5b-9 in the supernatant. This study shows that selective intervention in either the classical, alternative or terminal pathway prevented deposition of complement along the BM in an in vitro BP model. The results of our study greatly encourage the clinical development of complement inhibitors for the treatment of BP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny Giang
- Department of Pathology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn B A van Doorn
- Department of Dermatology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Centre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Gilles F H Diercks
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Santiago Rodriguez de Cordoba
- Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Enfermedades Raras, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Marco W J Schreurs
- Department of Immunology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Felix Poppelaars
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jeffrey Damman
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ujiie H, Rosmarin D, Schön MP, Ständer S, Boch K, Metz M, Maurer M, Thaci D, Schmidt E, Cole C, Amber KT, Didona D, Hertl M, Recke A, Graßhoff H, Hackel A, Schumann A, Riemekasten G, Bieber K, Sprow G, Dan J, Zillikens D, Sezin T, Christiano AM, Wolk K, Sabat R, Kridin K, Werth VP, Ludwig RJ. Unmet Medical Needs in Chronic, Non-communicable Inflammatory Skin Diseases. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:875492. [PMID: 35755063 PMCID: PMC9218547 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.875492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
An estimated 20-25% of the population is affected by chronic, non-communicable inflammatory skin diseases. Chronic skin inflammation has many causes. Among the most frequent chronic inflammatory skin diseases are atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, urticaria, lichen planus, and hidradenitis suppurativa, driven by a complex interplay of genetics and environmental factors. Autoimmunity is another important cause of chronic skin inflammation. The autoimmune response may be mainly T cell driven, such as in alopecia areata or vitiligo, or B cell driven in chronic spontaneous urticaria, pemphigus and pemphigoid diseases. Rare causes of chronic skin inflammation are autoinflammatory diseases, or rheumatic diseases, such as cutaneous lupus erythematosus or dermatomyositis. Whilst we have seen a significant improvement in diagnosis and treatment, several challenges remain. Especially for rarer causes of chronic skin inflammation, early diagnosis is often missed because of low awareness and lack of diagnostics. Systemic immunosuppression is the treatment of choice for almost all of these diseases. Adverse events due to immunosuppression, insufficient therapeutic responses and relapses remain a challenge. For atopic dermatitis and psoriasis, a broad spectrum of innovative treatments has been developed. However, treatment responses cannot be predicted so far. Hence, development of (bio)markers allowing selection of specific medications for individual patients is needed. Given the encouraging developments during the past years, we envision that many of these challenges in the diagnosis and treatment of chronic inflammatory skin diseases will be thoroughly addressed in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hideyuki Ujiie
- Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - David Rosmarin
- Department of Dermatology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Michael P Schön
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.,Lower Saxony Institute of Occupational Dermatology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Sonja Ständer
- Center for Chronic Pruritus, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Katharina Boch
- Department of Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Martin Metz
- Institute for Allergology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology (ITMP), Allergology and Immunology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marcus Maurer
- Institute for Allergology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology (ITMP), Allergology and Immunology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Diamant Thaci
- Institute and Comprehensive Center for Inflammation Medicine, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Enno Schmidt
- Department of Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.,Lübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology and Center for Research on Inflammation of the Skin, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Connor Cole
- Division of Dermatology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States.,Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Kyle T Amber
- Division of Dermatology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States.,Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Dario Didona
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Philipps-Universität, Marburg, Germany
| | - Michael Hertl
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Philipps-Universität, Marburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Recke
- Department of Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Hanna Graßhoff
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Alexander Hackel
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Anja Schumann
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Gabriela Riemekasten
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Katja Bieber
- Lübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology and Center for Research on Inflammation of the Skin, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Gant Sprow
- Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.,Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Joshua Dan
- Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.,Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Detlef Zillikens
- Department of Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Tanya Sezin
- Department of Dermatology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Angela M Christiano
- Department of Dermatology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Kerstin Wolk
- Psoriasis Research and Treatment Centre, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Interdisciplinary Group Molecular Immunopathology, Dermatology/Medical Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Robert Sabat
- Psoriasis Research and Treatment Centre, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Interdisciplinary Group Molecular Immunopathology, Dermatology/Medical Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Khalaf Kridin
- Lübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology and Center for Research on Inflammation of the Skin, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.,Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Safed, Israel
| | - Victoria P Werth
- Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.,Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Ralf J Ludwig
- Department of Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.,Lübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology and Center for Research on Inflammation of the Skin, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tekin B, Johnson EF, Wieland CN, Gibson LE, Camilleri MJ, Kalaaji AN, Comfere NI, Peters MS, Lehman JS. Histopathology of autoimmune bullous dermatoses: What's new? Hum Pathol 2022; 128:69-89. [PMID: 35764145 DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2022.06.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2022] [Revised: 06/19/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Autoimmune bullous dermatoses are characterized by the presence of tissue-bound and often circulating pathogenic autoantibodies targeting structural components of the skin and/or mucous membranes. The diagnostic workup for this heterogeneous group of disorders consists of a multi-step process, of which the light microscopic examination is a crucial component. This review is organized following a classification scheme that is based on two main histopathologic features, namely level of intraepithelial split and composition of the inflammatory infiltrate. Overall, we aim to place emphasis on the histopathologic clues that can assist pathologists in differential diagnosis and review the updates in the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Burak Tekin
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Emma F Johnson
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Carilyn N Wieland
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Lawrence E Gibson
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Michael J Camilleri
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Amer N Kalaaji
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Nneka I Comfere
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Margot S Peters
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Julia S Lehman
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Xie YH, Wang SH, Li SZ, Zuo YG. Coexistence of Anti-p200 Pemphigoid and Psoriasis: A Systematic Review. Front Immunol 2022; 13:839094. [PMID: 35317170 PMCID: PMC8934418 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.839094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2021] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A close association between psoriasis and anti-p200 pemphigoid has been demonstrated by numerous studies. However, the clinical characteristics of patients suffering from these two entities have not yet been well-elucidated. Objective This study aimed to review the case reports and case series, summarizing clinical features and therapeutic strategies in patients suffering from anti-p200 pemphigoid and psoriasis. Methods A systematic review was conducted by searching PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases for studies published in English involving patients with psoriasis and anti-p200 pemphigoid on 6 September 2021. All case reports and case series reporting patients diagnosed with anti-p200 pemphigoid and psoriasis were included in this systematic review. Results A total of 21 eligible studies comprising 26 anti-p200 pemphigoid patients with preceding psoriasis were included in the qualitative synthesis. The average age at blisters eruption was 62.5 years, and the mean duration between the two entities was 15.6 years. Twenty-four percent of patients developed bullous lesions during UV therapy. Clinical manifestation of bullae and/or vesicles was recorded in all patients, and the trunk (94.7%) was most frequently involved, with only 15.8% reporting mucosal involvement. Epitope spreading was detected by immunoblotting in 33.3% of patients. All the patients reached completed remission during the course of disease, with 36.8% experiencing at least one relapse. Monotherapy of prednisolone was the leading therapeutic approach (n=6, 31.6%) required for disease control, but 5 (83.3%) of them suffered from blister recurrence after tapering or ceasing corticosteroid. Conclusion Most of the clinical aspects of patients with anti-p200 pemphigoid and psoriasis were similar to what was demonstrated in previous articles on anti-p200 pemphigoid. Nevertheless, compared with other anti-p200 pemphigoid cases without psoriasis, a clinical manifestation pattern with more frequent involvement of the trunk and less mucosal involvement was illustrated in those with psoriasis. Generally, monotherapy is sufficient for a complete remission for such patients. However, one or more relapses have been recorded in a considerable portion of patients, especially those prescribed with prednisolone. It reminded us to be more cautious during a tapering of medication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Ya-Gang Zuo
- Department of Dermatology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gribaleva E, van der Molen SM, Kramer D, Horvath B, Allenova A, Diercks GFH, Pas HH. Subepidermal type VII collagen speckles as an additional clue for diagnosing epidermolysis bullosa acquisita by salt-split skin serum analysis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2022; 36:e384-e386. [PMID: 35030274 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.17926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2021] [Revised: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- E Gribaleva
- Division of Immune-mediated Skin Diseases, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - S M van der Molen
- Center for Blistering Diseases, Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - D Kramer
- Center for Blistering Diseases, Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - B Horvath
- Center for Blistering Diseases, Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - A Allenova
- Division of Immune-mediated Skin Diseases, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - G F H Diercks
- Center for Blistering Diseases, Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - H H Pas
- Center for Blistering Diseases, Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Leiferman KM, Snook JP, Khalighi MA, Kuechle MK, Zone JJ. Diagnostics for Dermatologic Diseases with Autoantibodies. J Appl Lab Med 2022; 7:165-196. [DOI: 10.1093/jalm/jfab147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Dermatologic diseases with autoantibodies were recognized early as autoimmunity became accepted as a pathogenic immunologic concept. Laboratory testing to identify disease-defining autoantibodies and investigate their role in pathophysiology has evolved since.
Content
Blistering dermatologic diseases, profiled by autoantibody production, target epithelial components critical in cell–cell and cell–matrix adhesion, resulting in epithelial separation and other characteristic features of the disorders. This review covers the clinical indications for dermatologic disease-related autoantibody testing, the specifics of procuring specimens to test, the available diagnostic tests, and information provided by the testing. Atypical, uncharacteristic, and less well-known clinical and autoantibody profiles as well as several of the many future prospects for expansion of the testing applications are elaborated on in the online Data Supplement.
Summary
Autoantibody-associated dermatologic diseases are acquired immunologic disorders that have considerable clinical implications affecting essential barrier functions of skin and mucous membranes and causing discomfort, including pain and pruritus. Certain of the diseases can have life-threatening manifestations, and treatments can have significant side-effects. The skin diseases may presage other clinical associations that are important to recognize and treat. Laboratory testing aids in the diagnosis of these diseases through identification of the autoantibodies and is essential for prompt and precise knowledge of the disease type for prognosis, further clinical evaluations, and treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin M Leiferman
- Immunodermatology Laboratory, Department of Dermatology, University of Utah, UT, USA
| | - Jeremy P Snook
- Immunodermatology Laboratory, Department of Dermatology, University of Utah, UT, USA
| | - Mazdak A Khalighi
- Immunodermatology Laboratory, Department of Dermatology, University of Utah, UT, USA
| | - Melanie K Kuechle
- Immunodermatology Laboratory, Department of Dermatology, University of Utah, UT, USA
- Puget Sound Dermatology, Edmonds, WA. USA
| | - John J Zone
- Immunodermatology Laboratory, Department of Dermatology, University of Utah, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Damman J, Edwards G, van Doorn MB, Horvath B, Diercks GFH. Diagnostic Utility of C4d by Direct Immunofluorescence in Bullous Pemphigoid. Am J Dermatopathol 2021; 43:727-729. [PMID: 33395046 DOI: 10.1097/dad.0000000000001873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is an autoimmune blistering disease that commonly affects elderly patients. Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) for immunoglobulin G (IgG) and C3c on frozen skin biopsies is the gold standard for the diagnosis of BP. In a minority of cases, IgG and/or C3c are found negative, and in these situations, there is a need for a more stable diagnostic marker of BP. C4d is biologically inactive, but has a long half-life, rendering it a long-lived marker for antibody-mediated complement activation. Previous studies already demonstrated that C4d was diagnostically useful in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded skin biopsies of patients with BP. We hypothesized that C4d detected by DIF could also be a promising diagnostic marker for BP, particularly in IgG and/or C3c DIF-negative cases. In this single-center retrospective study, 69 cases of BP were analyzed for linear deposition of C4d; of the 69 cases, n = 26 were IgG+/C3c-, n = 10 IgG+/C3c+, and n = 33 IgG-/C3c-. Results were compared with n = 39 negative controls. Seven of the 26 (27%) IgG+/C3c- and 3 of the 33 (9%) IgG-/C3c- BP cases were positive for C4d. All 10 IgG+/C3c+ cases were also C4d positive. In the negative control group, 2 of the 39 (5%) were found positive for C4d. In conclusion, the current study shows that C4d is a more sensitive but not a 100% specific marker of BP. We conclude that C4d by DIF could be an interesting diagnostic adjunct for BP, particularly in IgG-/C3c- double negative cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey Damman
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gareth Edwards
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Martijn B van Doorn
- Department of Dermatology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; and
| | - Barbara Horvath
- Department of Dermatology, Center for Blistering Diseases, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Gilles F H Diercks
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Schmidt E, Rashid H, Marzano A, Lamberts A, Di Zenzo G, Diercks G, Alberti‐Violetti S, Barry R, Borradori L, Caproni M, Carey B, Carrozzo M, Cianchini G, Corrà A, Dikkers F, Feliciani C, Geerling G, Genovese G, Hertl M, Joly P, Meijer J, Mercadante V, Murrell D, Ormond M, Pas H, Patsatsi A, Rauz S, van Rhijn B, Roth M, Setterfield J, Zillikens D, C.Prost, Zambruno G, Horváth B, Caux F. European Guidelines (S3) on diagnosis and management of mucous membrane pemphigoid, initiated by the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology - Part II. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2021; 35:1926-1948. [PMID: 34309078 PMCID: PMC8518905 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.17395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
This guideline has been initiated by the task force Autoimmune Blistering Diseases of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, including physicians from all relevant disciplines and patient organizations. It is a S3 consensus-based guideline that systematically reviewed the literature on mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) in the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases until June 2019, with no limitations on language. While the first part of this guideline addressed methodology, as well as epidemiology, terminology, aetiology, clinical presentation and outcome measures in MMP, the second part presents the diagnostics and management of MMP. MMP should be suspected in cases with predominant mucosal lesions. Direct immunofluorescence microscopy to detect tissue-bound IgG, IgA and/or complement C3, combined with serological testing for circulating autoantibodies are recommended. In most patients, serum autoantibodies are present only in low levels and in variable proportions, depending on the clinical sites involved. Circulating autoantibodies are determined by indirect IF assays using tissue substrates, or ELISA using different recombinant forms of the target antigens or immunoblotting using different substrates. The major target antigen in MMP is type XVII collagen (BP180), although in 10-25% of patients laminin 332 is recognized. In 25-30% of MMP patients with anti-laminin 332 reactivity, malignancies have been associated. As first-line treatment of mild/moderate MMP, dapsone, methotrexate or tetracyclines and/or topical corticosteroids are recommended. For severe MMP, dapsone and oral or intravenous cyclophosphamide and/or oral corticosteroids are recommended as first-line regimens. Additional recommendations are given, tailored to treatment of single-site MMP such as oral, ocular, laryngeal, oesophageal and genital MMP, as well as the diagnosis of ocular MMP. Treatment recommendations are limited by the complete lack of high-quality randomized controlled trials.
Collapse
|
13
|
Arora S, Shetty VM, Rao CR, Pai SB, Rao R. Serration pattern analysis as a practical adjunct tool for categorization of subepidermal autoimmune blistering diseases. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2021; 87:778-786. [PMID: 34491679 DOI: 10.25259/ijdvl_1232_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Serration pattern analysis helps in the classification of subepidermal autoimmune blistering disorders; more precisely, it helps to differentiate epidermolysis bullosa acquisita from other subepidermal autoimmune blistering disorders. Most of the published reports of this tool have come from a single center. OBJECTIVES The objectives of the study were to study the utility of serration pattern analysis in classifying subepidermal autoimmune blistering disorders. METHODS Seventy five cases of subepidermal autoimmune blistering disorders were enrolled in this prospective study. A three millimeter punch biopsy was taken from the perilesional skin or mucosa for direct immunofluorescence; indirect immunofluorescence was carried out using salt-split skin. Subclassification of subepidermal autoimmune blistering disorders was done based on direct immunofluorescence, indirect immunofluorescence on salt-split skin, indirect immunofluorescence using knockout skin and serration pattern analysis findings. RESULTS Indirect immunofluorescence was positive in 68 cases; 14 cases showed a dermal staining pattern while the rest showed either an epidermal or a combined pattern. All patients with epidermal or combined staining patterns showed "n" serrated pattern on direct immunofluorescence. Nine patients with dermal staining on indirect immunofluorescence also revealed an "n" serration pattern on direct immunofluorescence indicating the diagnosis of anti-p200 pemphigoid, and the rest showed a "u" serrated pattern. Three patients with negative indirect immunofluorescence showed "u" serration on direct immunofluorescence while the rest showed "n" serration. LIMITATIONS ELISA and immunoblotting could not be performed due to resource constraints. CONCLUSION Based on indirect immunofluorescence and serration pattern analysis, classification of the majority of patients with subepidermal autoimmune blistering disorders was possible in our study. Pattern recognition is a cost-effective tool and can be easily learnt. It is recommended to be practiced in all laboratories where facilities for advanced immunological diagnosis are unavailable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sukriti Arora
- Department of Dermatology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
| | - Varsha M Shetty
- Department of Dermatology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
| | - Chythra R Rao
- Department of Community Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
| | - Satish B Pai
- Department of Dermatology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
| | - Raghavendra Rao
- Department of Dermatology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Beek NV, Zillikens D, Schmidt E. Bullous Autoimmune Dermatoses. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL 2021; 118:413-420. [PMID: 34369370 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2020] [Revised: 08/03/2020] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bullous autoimmune dermatoses are a clinically and immunopatho - logically heterogeneous group of diseases, characterized clinically by blisters or erosions of the skin and/or mucous membranes. In Germany, their prevalence is approximately 40 000 cases nationwide, and their incidence approximately 20 new cases per million people per year. METHODS This review is based on publications that were retrieved by a selective search of the literature focusing on the current German and European guidelines. RESULTS Recent years have seen the publication of guidelines, controlled prospective clinical trials, and multicenter diagnostic studies improving both diagnosis and therapy. Specific monovalent and multivariate serological test systems and pattern analysis of tissue-bound autoantibodies allow identification of the target antigens in 80-90% of patients. This enables the precise classification of disease entities, with implications for treatment selection and disease outcome. In 2019, the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab was approved by the European Medicines Agency for the treatment of moderate and severe pemphigus vulgaris, with an ensuing marked improvement in the care of the affected patients. To treat mild and moderate bullous pemphigoid, topical clobetasol proprionate is recommended, in severe disease, combined with systemic treatment, i.e. usually (a) prednisolone p.o. at an initial dose of 0.5mg/kg/d , (b) an immunomodulant, e.g. dapsone or doxycycline, or (c) prednisolone plus an immunomodulant. CONCLUSION The early recognition and precise diagnostic evaluation of bullous autoimmune dermatoses now enables improved, often interdisciplinary treatment, in accordance with the available guidelines. Current research projects are focused on new treatment approaches, an improved understanding of the underlying pathophysiology, and further refinements of diagnostic techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina van Beek
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany; Lubeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology (LIED), University of Lubeck, Lubeck, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Becker M, Schumacher N, Schmidt E, Zillikens D, Sadik CD. Evaluation and Comparison of Clinical and iLaboratory Characteristics of Patients With IgA Epidermolysis Bullosa Acquisita, Linear IgA Bullous Dermatosis, and IgG Epidermolysis Bullosa Acquisita. JAMA Dermatol 2021; 157:917-923. [PMID: 34160564 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.0762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance Immunoglobulin A (IgA) epidermolysis bullosa acquisita (EBA) is an autoimmune skin blistering disease with IgA autoantibodies directed against type VII collagen. There is debate whether it should be considered part of the clinical spectrum of linear IgA bullous dermatosis (LABD) or a separate disease entity. Objective This cohort study aimed to define the clinical features and treatment responses of IgA EBA and anti-BP180-driven LABD, and to compare the prevalences of IgA EBA anti-BP180 LABD and classic IgG-mediated EBA in an autoimmune diagnostic laboratory database. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study and case series study included demographic, immunopathologic, and serologic data from 300 patients diagnosed with IgA EBA, IgG EBA, or LABD. Furthermore, clinical features and treatment responses of IgA EBA were analyzed in a case series including 4 patients with IgA EBA. All patients from the database of the autoimmune diagnostic laboratory at the Department of Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Germany, who were diagnosed with IgA EBA, LABD, or IgG EBA between October 2010 and July 2019 were included. Four patients diagnosed with IgA EBA between October 2015 and January 2018 are described in detail. Main Outcomes and Measures The clinical course of IgA EBA was observed before and during different treatments. Results The database search yielded 21 cases of IgA EBA (12 females [57%]/9 males [43%]), 222 cases of LABD (111 females [51%]/106 males [49]), and 57 cases of IgG EBA (29 females [50%]/28 males [48%]). The median (range) age of each cohort was 64 (4-81) years for IgA EBA, 56 (3-92) years for IgG EBA, and significantly older compared with IgG EBA (P = .002) for those with LAPD (median [range], 70 [1-94] years). The patients with IgA EBA exhibited heterogeneous clinical presentations that significantly differed from those of anti-BP180 LABD. All 4 patients with IgA EBA described in detail were first treated with dapsone, but only 1 responded to this treatment. The others required treatment with high-dose dexamethasone, rituximab, and/or intravenous immunoglobulins to achieve partial clinical remission. Conclusions and Relevance Overall, the findings of this cohort study and small case series suggest that IgA EBA may be more common than expected and may require more intensive systemic treatment than LABD, suggesting it should be considered a separate disease entity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mareike Becker
- Department of Dermatology, Allergy, and Venereology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.,Lübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Nina Schumacher
- Department of Dermatology, Allergy, and Venereology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Enno Schmidt
- Department of Dermatology, Allergy, and Venereology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.,Lübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.,Center for Research on Inflammation of the Skin
| | - Detlef Zillikens
- Department of Dermatology, Allergy, and Venereology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.,Center for Research on Inflammation of the Skin
| | - Christian D Sadik
- Department of Dermatology, Allergy, and Venereology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.,Center for Research on Inflammation of the Skin
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Shi C, Meijer JM, Azzopardi G, Diercks GFH, Guo J, Petkov N. Use of Convolutional Neural Networks for the Detection of u-Serrated Patterns in Direct Immunofluorescence Images to Facilitate the Diagnosis of Epidermolysis Bullosa Acquisita. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY 2021; 191:1520-1525. [PMID: 34197776 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2021.05.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Revised: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
The u-serrated immunodeposition pattern in direct immunofluorescence (DIF) microscopy is a recognizable feature and confirmative for the diagnosis of epidermolysis bullosa acquisita (EBA). Due to unfamiliarity with serrated patterns, serration pattern recognition is still of limited use in routine DIF microscopy. The objective of this study was to investigate the feasibility of using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for the recognition of u-serrated patterns that can assist in the diagnosis of EBA. The nine most commonly used CNNs were trained and validated by using 220,800 manually delineated DIF image patches from 106 images of 46 different patients. The data set was split into 10 subsets: nine training subsets from 42 patients to train CNNs and the last subset from the remaining four patients for a validation data set of diagnostic accuracy. This process was repeated 10 times with a different subset used for validation. The best-performing CNN achieved a specificity of 89.3% and a corresponding sensitivity of 89.3% in the classification of u-serrated DIF image patches, an expert level of diagnostic accuracy. Experiments and results show the effectiveness of CNN approaches for u-serrated pattern recognition with a high accuracy. The proposed approach can assist clinicians and pathologists in recognition of u-serrated patterns in DIF images and facilitate the diagnosis of EBA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chenyu Shi
- Bernoulli Institute for Mathematics, Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Joost M Meijer
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Blistering Diseases, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - George Azzopardi
- Bernoulli Institute for Mathematics, Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Gilles F H Diercks
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Blistering Diseases, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Blistering Diseases, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Jiapan Guo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Nicolai Petkov
- Bernoulli Institute for Mathematics, Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Rai R, Anand JB, Shanmugasekar C, Arunprasath P, Chaitra V, Zillikens D, Schimdt E. Anti-P 200 pemphigoid - The most common floor binding subepidermal autoimmune bullous disease in a tertiary care center in south India. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2021; 87:787-791. [PMID: 34160166 DOI: 10.25259/ijdvl_79_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2020] [Accepted: 01/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The pemphigoid group of diseases may present clinically and immunologically in a very similar fashion. Indirect immunofluorescence microscopy with readily available salt-split human skin in a BIOCHIP™ helps to classify these conditions as those with either with roof binding or floor binding of immunoreactants. Epidermolysis bullosa acquisita, anti-laminin 332 pemphigoid and anti-p200 pemphigoid show floor binding, while in the most frequent type of pemphigoid disease, bullous pemphigoid, epidermal side staining pattern is seen on salt-split skin Aims: The aim of the study was to detect the target antigens in sub-epidermal bullous diseases. METHODS Forty patients with bullous pemphigoid diagnosed by lesional histopathology and direct immunofluorescence microscopy were re-evaluated by a BIOCHIP™ mosaic containing both tissue substrates and recombinant target antigens. Sera with floor pattern staining on salt-split skin were further evaluated by immunoblotting with dermal extract. RESULTS Five patients with floor staining had anti-p200 pemphigoid. LIMITATIONS We could not perform serration pattern analysis of direct immunofluorescence in our patients. CONCLUSION Histopathology and direct immunofluorescence microscopy cannot differentiate between various entities of pemphigoid diseases. A multivariant approach using a BIOCHIP™ mosaic including salt-split skin followed by immunoblotting with dermal extract helps to identify the target antigen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reena Rai
- Department of Dermatology, PSG IMSR, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - J Bede Anand
- Department of Dermatology, PSG IMSR, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - C Shanmugasekar
- Department of Dermatology, PSG IMSR, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - P Arunprasath
- Department of Dermatology, PSG IMSR, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - V Chaitra
- Department of Pathology, PSG IMSR, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Detlef Zillikens
- Department of Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Enno Schimdt
- Department of Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Rashid H, Meijer JM, Diercks GFH, Sieben NE, Bolling MC, Pas HH, Horvath B. Assessment of Diagnostic Strategy for Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid. JAMA Dermatol 2021; 157:780-787. [PMID: 33909024 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.1036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance An accurate diagnosis of mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) is essential to reduce diagnostic and therapeutic delay. Objective To assess the diagnostic accuracy of direct immunofluorescence microscopy on mucosal biopsy specimens and immunoserology in a large cohort of patients with suspected MMP. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study was carried out in a single tertiary care center for blistering diseases between January 2002 and March 2019. Eligible participants were patients with suspected MMP and paired data on at least a mucosal biopsy specimen for direct immunofluorescence microscopy (DIF) and indirect immunofluorescence microscopy (IIF) on a human salt-split skin substrate (SSS). In addition, an optional DIF test on a skin biopsy specimen and one or more performed routine immunoserologic tests were analyzed. Data analysis was conducted from April 2019, to June 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures Diagnostic accuracy of DIF, IIF SSS, and immunoblot for BP180 and BP230. Results Of the 787 participants, 121 (15.4%) received the diagnosis of MMP (50 men [41.3%], 71 women [58.7%]; mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 60.1 [17.7] years). Sixty-seven of the patients with MMP (55.4%) had monosite involvement, of which oral site was the most frequently affected (51 [42.1%]). No significant difference was found between the sensitivity of DIF on a perilesional buccal biopsy and a normal buccal biopsy (89.3% vs 76.7%). Three patients with solitary ocular involvement showed a positive DIF of only the oral mucosa. In 6 patients with a negative mucosal DIF, a skin biopsy confirmed diagnosis of MMP. Overall, IIF SSS was less sensitive (44.6%), but highly specific (98.9%). The sensitivity of immunoblot (66.1%) was higher compared to SSS, but with lower specificity (91.3%). Conclusions and Relevance This comparative diagnostic accuracy study of a cohort of 787 patients found a high sensitivity of a mucosal DIF biopsy for diagnosis of MMP, and lower sensitivity of serologic analysis. A biopsy can be taken from either perilesional or normal buccal mucosa. An additional DIF biopsy of another mucosal site or of affected or unaffected skin may increase the diagnostic yield and is recommended in patients with negative DIF results and high clinical suspicion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanan Rashid
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Dermatology, Center of Blistering Diseases, European Reference Network-Skin Member, the Netherlands
| | - Joost M Meijer
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Dermatology, Center of Blistering Diseases, European Reference Network-Skin Member, the Netherlands
| | - Gilles F H Diercks
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Pathology, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Nini E Sieben
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Dermatology, Center of Blistering Diseases, European Reference Network-Skin Member, the Netherlands
| | - Maria C Bolling
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Dermatology, Center of Blistering Diseases, European Reference Network-Skin Member, the Netherlands
| | - Hendri H Pas
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Dermatology, Center of Blistering Diseases, European Reference Network-Skin Member, the Netherlands
| | - Barbara Horvath
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Dermatology, Center of Blistering Diseases, European Reference Network-Skin Member, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Subepithelial autoimmune blistering dermatoses: Clinical features and diagnosis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2021; 85:1-14. [PMID: 33684496 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.11.076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2020] [Revised: 11/01/2020] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Subepithelial autoimmune blistering dermatoses are a group of rare skin disorders that are characterized by the disruption of the dermal-epidermal junction through the action of autoantibodies. The third article in this continuing medical education series explores the background, epidemiology, clinical features, and diagnostic criteria of each of the major subepithelial autoimmune blistering dermatoses, including bullous pemphigoid, pemphigoid gestationis, lichen planus pemphigoides, mucous membrane pemphigoid, linear IgA bullous dermatosis, and dermatitis herpetiformis.
Collapse
|
20
|
Bieber K, Kridin K, Emtenani S, Boch K, Schmidt E, Ludwig RJ. Milestones in Personalized Medicine in Pemphigus and Pemphigoid. Front Immunol 2021; 11:591971. [PMID: 33505392 PMCID: PMC7829330 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.591971] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2020] [Accepted: 11/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Pemphigus and pemphigoid diseases are autoimmune bullous diseases characterized and caused by autoantibodies targeting adhesion molecules in the skin and/or mucous membranes. Personalized medicine is a new medical model that separates patients into different groups and aims to tailor medical decisions, practices, and interventions based on the individual patient`s predicted response or risk factors. An important milestone in personalized medicine in pemphigus and pemphigoid was achieved by verifying the autoimmune pathogenesis underlying these diseases, as well as by identifying and cloning several pemphigus/pemphigoid autoantigens. The latter has become the basis of the current, molecular-based diagnosis that allows the differentiation of about a dozen pemphigus and pemphigoid entities. The importance of autoantigen-identification in pemphigus/pemphigoid is further highlighted by the emergence of autoantigen-specific B cell depleting strategies. To achieve this goal, the chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell technology, which is used for the treatment of certain hematological malignancies, was adopted, by generating chimeric autoantigen receptor (CAAR) T cells. In addition to these more basic science-driven milestones in personalized medicine in pemphigus and pemphigoid, careful clinical observation and epidemiology are again contributing to personalized medicine. The identification of clearly distinct clinical phenotypes in pemphigoid like the non-inflammatory and gliptin-associated bullous pemphigoid embodies a prominent instance of the latter. We here review these exciting developments in basic, translational, clinical, and epidemiological research in pemphigus and pemphigoid. Overall, we hereby aim to attract more researchers and clinicians to this highly interesting and dynamic field of research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katja Bieber
- Lübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology and Center for Research on Inflammation of the Skin, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Khalaf Kridin
- Lübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology and Center for Research on Inflammation of the Skin, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Shirin Emtenani
- Lübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology and Center for Research on Inflammation of the Skin, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Katharina Boch
- Department of Dermatology and Center for Research on Inflammation of the Skin, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Enno Schmidt
- Lübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology and Center for Research on Inflammation of the Skin, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
- Department of Dermatology and Center for Research on Inflammation of the Skin, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Ralf J. Ludwig
- Lübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology and Center for Research on Inflammation of the Skin, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
- Department of Dermatology and Center for Research on Inflammation of the Skin, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
Blisters and erosions of skin and mucous membranes are key features of the clinically heterogeneous group of autoimmune bullous diseases (AIBDs). These can be divided into pemphigoid diseases with autoantibodies against structural proteins of the dermal-epidermal junction, pemphigus diseases with autoantibodies against desmosomal proteins, and dermatitis herpetiformis with autoantibodies against transglutaminases 1 and 2. A differentiation based only on clinical features is often not sufficient. After researching the literature in PubMed, the current diagnostic tools for AIBDs are summarized.AIBD diagnostics are performed using histology, direct and indirect immunofluorescence, as well as ELISA and immunoblotting. For serological diagnosis, the conventional multistep approach or multivariant assays for the analysis of autoantibodies against several target antigens in parallel can be applied. These allow a precise classification of AIBD and therefore a tailored use of different therapeutic regimens, e.g., for bullous pemphigoid or pemphigus foliaceus/vulgaris, as well as identification of disease entities with a known association with neoplasia.Direct immunofluorescence is still the diagnostic mainstay of AIBDs. However, novel serological assays, such as target-antigen-specific ELISA or indirect immunofluorescence systems using BIOCHIP™ mosaic technology, allow serologic diagnosis in most AIBD patients and the exact classification of the disease entity at the molecular level.
Collapse
|
22
|
Senatore S, Maglie R, Salemme A, Caproni M, Di Zenzo G, Antiga E. Serration pattern analysis as a tool for the diagnosis of immunoglobulin A-mediated epidermolysis bullosa acquisita. J Dermatol 2020; 47:e198-e199. [PMID: 32125019 DOI: 10.1111/1346-8138.15161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Senatore
- Section of Dermatology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Roberto Maglie
- Section of Dermatology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Adele Salemme
- Molecular and Cell Biology Laboratory, IDI-IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Marzia Caproni
- Section of Dermatology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Emiliano Antiga
- Section of Dermatology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Rashid H, Lamberts A, Diercks GFH, Pas HH, Meijer JM, Bolling MC, Horváth B. Oral Lesions in Autoimmune Bullous Diseases: An Overview of Clinical Characteristics and Diagnostic Algorithm. Am J Clin Dermatol 2019; 20:847-861. [PMID: 31313078 PMCID: PMC6872602 DOI: 10.1007/s40257-019-00461-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Autoimmune bullous diseases are a group of chronic inflammatory disorders caused by autoantibodies targeted against structural proteins of the desmosomal and hemidesmosomal plaques in the skin and mucosa, leading to intra-epithelial or subepithelial blistering. The oral mucosa is frequently affected in these diseases, in particular, in mucous membrane pemphigoid, pemphigus vulgaris, and paraneoplastic pemphigus. The clinical symptoms are heterogeneous and may present with erythema, blisters, erosions, and ulcers localized anywhere on the oral mucosa, and lead to severe complaints for the patients including pain, dysphagia, and foetor. Therefore, a quick and proper diagnosis with adequate treatment is needed. Clinical presentations of autoimmune bullous diseases often overlap and diagnosis cannot be made based on clinical features alone. Immunodiagnostic tests are of great importance in differentiating between the different diseases. Direct immunofluorescence microscopy shows depositions of autoantibodies along the epithelial basement membrane zone in mucous membrane pemphigoid subtypes, or depositions on the epithelial cell surface in pemphigus variants. Additional immunoserological tests are useful to discriminate between the different subtypes of pemphigoid, and are essential to differentiate between pemphigus and paraneoplastic pemphigus. This review gives an overview of the clinical characteristics of oral lesions and the diagnostic procedures in autoimmune blistering diseases, and provides a diagnostic algorithm for daily practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanan Rashid
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Aniek Lamberts
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Gilles F H Diercks
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Hendri H Pas
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Joost M Meijer
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Maria C Bolling
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Barbara Horváth
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Meijer JM, Diercks GFH, de Lang EWG, Pas HH, Jonkman MF. Assessment of Diagnostic Strategy for Early Recognition of Bullous and Nonbullous Variants of Pemphigoid. JAMA Dermatol 2019; 155:158-165. [PMID: 30624575 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.4390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance A substantial number of patients with bullous pemphigoid do not develop skin blisters and may not have received the correct diagnosis. Diagnostic criteria and an optimal diagnostic strategy are needed for early recognition and trials. Objectives To assess the minimal requirements for diagnosis of bullous and nonbullous forms of pemphigoid and to evaluate the optimal diagnostic strategy. Design, Setting, and Participants This paired, multivariable, diagnostic accuracy study analyzed data from 1125 consecutive patients with suspected pemphigoid who were referred to the Groningen Center for Blistering Diseases from secondary and tertiary care hospitals throughout the Netherlands. Eligible participants were patients with paired data on at least (1) a skin biopsy specimen for the direct immunofluorescence (DIF) microscopy test; (2) indirect immunofluorescence on a human salt-split skin substrate (IIF SSS) test; and (3) 1 or more routine immunoserologic tests administered between January 1, 2002, and May 1, 2015. Samples were taken from patients at the time of first diagnosis, before introduction of immunosuppressive therapy, and within an inclusion window of a maximum of 4 weeks. Data analysis was conducted from October 1, 2015, to December 1, 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures Pairwise DIF, IIF SSS, IIF on monkey esophagus, BP180 and BP230 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, and immunoblot for BP180 and BP230 tests were performed. The results were reported in accordance with 2015 version of the Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy. Results Of the 1125 patients analyzed, 653 (58.0%) were women and 472 (42.0%) were men, with a mean (SD) age of 63.2 (19.9) years. In total, 343 participants received a pemphigoid diagnosis, with 782 controls. Of the 343 patients, 74 (21.6%, or 1 in 5) presented with nonbullous pemphigoid. The DIF microscopy was the most sensitive diagnostic test (88.3% [n = 303]; 95% CI, 84.5%-91.3%), whereas IIF SSS was less sensitive (77.0% [n = 263]; 95% CI, 72.2%-81.1%) but was highly specific (99.9%; 95% CI, 99.3%-100%) and complemented most cases with negative DIF findings. Results of the BP180 NC16A enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay did not add diagnostic value for initial diagnosis in multivariable logistic regression analysis of combined tests. These findings lead to the proposed minimal criteria for diagnosing pemphigoid: (1) pruritus and/or predominant cutaneous blisters, (2) linear IgG and/or C3c deposits (in an n-serrated pattern) by DIF on a skin biopsy specimen, and (3) positive epidermal side staining of IgG by IIF SSS on a serum sample; this proposal extends bullous pemphigoid with the unrecognized nonbullous form. Conclusions and Relevance Both DIF and IIF SSS tests should be performed for diagnosis of the bullous and nonbullous variants of pemphigoid, and the BP180 NC16A enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay is recommended as an add-on test for disease activity monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joost M Meijer
- Center for Blistering Diseases, Department of Dermatology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Gilles F H Diercks
- Center for Blistering Diseases, Department of Dermatology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Emma W G de Lang
- Center for Blistering Diseases, Department of Dermatology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Hendri H Pas
- Center for Blistering Diseases, Department of Dermatology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Marcel F Jonkman
- Center for Blistering Diseases, Department of Dermatology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Harrell J, Rubio XB, Nielson C, Hsu S, Motaparthi K. Advances in the diagnosis of autoimmune bullous dermatoses. Clin Dermatol 2019; 37:692-712. [PMID: 31864451 DOI: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2019.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Autoimmune bullous dermatoses are defined by autoantibodies directed against adhesion proteins in the epidermis or basement membrane zone, resulting in blister formation on the skin and mucosa. Diagnosis depends on lesional biopsy for histopathology and perilesional biopsy for direct immunofluorescence. Additional diagnostic methods include indirect immunofluorescence, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and immunoblot (Western blot), which may be selected in specific clinical scenarios due to improved sensitivity and/or specificity. This contribution reviews the available evidence supporting the use of each method to provide a practical reference for clinicians when diagnosing autoimmune bullous disorders. Techniques and cost are reviewed, and newer diagnostic techniques with potential for clinical application are.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane Harrell
- University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | | | - Colton Nielson
- Department of Dermatology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Sylvia Hsu
- Department of Dermatology, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kiran Motaparthi
- Department of Dermatology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Saschenbrecker S, Karl I, Komorowski L, Probst C, Dähnrich C, Fechner K, Stöcker W, Schlumberger W. Serological Diagnosis of Autoimmune Bullous Skin Diseases. Front Immunol 2019; 10:1974. [PMID: 31552014 PMCID: PMC6736620 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2019] [Accepted: 08/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Autoimmune bullous dermatoses (AIBD) encompass a variety of organ-specific autoimmune diseases that manifest with cutaneous and/or mucosal blisters and erosions. They are characterized by autoantibodies targeting structural proteins of the skin, which are responsible for the intercellular contact between epidermal keratinocytes and for adhesion of the basal keratinocytes to the dermis. The autoantibodies disrupt the adhesive functions, leading to splitting and blister formation. In pemphigus diseases, blisters form intraepidermally, whereas in all other disease types they occur subepidermally. Early identification of autoimmune bullous dermatoses is crucial for both treatment and prognosis, particularly as regards tumor-associated disease entities. The diagnosis is based on clinical symptoms, histopathology, direct immunofluorescence to detect antibody/complement deposits, and the determination of circulating autoantibodies. The identification of various target antigens has paved the way for the recent development of numerous specific autoantibody tests. In particular, optimized designer antigens and multiplex test formats for indirect immunofluorescence and ELISA have enhanced and refined the laboratory analysis, enabling highly efficient serodiagnosis and follow-up. This review elaborates on the current standards in the serological diagnostics for autoimmune bullous dermatoses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ingolf Karl
- Institute for Experimental Immunology, Euroimmun AG, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Lars Komorowski
- Institute for Experimental Immunology, Euroimmun AG, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Christian Probst
- Institute for Experimental Immunology, Euroimmun AG, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Cornelia Dähnrich
- Institute for Experimental Immunology, Euroimmun AG, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Kai Fechner
- Institute for Experimental Immunology, Euroimmun AG, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Winfried Stöcker
- Institute for Experimental Immunology, Euroimmun AG, Lübeck, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Epidermolysis bullosa acquisita: A comprehensive review. Autoimmun Rev 2019; 18:786-795. [DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2019.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2019] [Accepted: 02/26/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
28
|
Santi CG, Gripp AC, Roselino AM, Mello DS, Gordilho JO, Marsillac PFD, Porro AM. Consensus on the treatment of autoimmune bullous dermatoses: bullous pemphigoid, mucous membrane pemphigoid and epidermolysis bullosa acquisita - Brazilian Society of Dermatology. An Bras Dermatol 2019; 94:33-47. [PMID: 31166405 PMCID: PMC6544032 DOI: 10.1590/abd1806-4841.2019940207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2018] [Accepted: 01/30/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Bullous pemphigoid, mucous membrane pemphigoid and epidermolysis bullosa
acquisita are subepidermal autoimmune blistering diseases whose antigenic target
is located at the basement membrane zone. Mucous membrane pemphigoid and
epidermolysis bullosa acquisita can evolve with cicatricial mucosal involvement,
leading to respiratory, ocular and/or digestive sequelae with important
morbidity. For each of these dermatoses, a literature review covering all
therapeutic options was performed. A flowchart, based on the experience and
joint discussion among the authors of this consensus, was constructed to provide
treatment orientation for these diseases in Brazil. In summary, in the
localized, low-risk or non-severe forms, drugs that have immunomodulatory action
such as dapsone, doxycycline among others may be a therapeutic option. Topical
treatment with corticosteroids or immunomodulators may also be used. Systemic
corticosteroid therapy continues to be the treatment of choice for severe forms,
especially those involving ocular, laryngeal-pharyngeal and/or esophageal
mucosal involvement, as may occur in mucous membrane pemphigoid and
epidermolysis bullosa acquisita. Several immunosuppressants are used as adjuvant
alternatives. In severe and recalcitrant cases, intravenous immunoglobulin is an
alternative that, while expensive, may be used. Immunobiological drugs such as
rituximab are promising drugs in this area. Omalizumab has been used in bullous
pemphigoid.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Giuli Santi
- Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Alexandre Carlos Gripp
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital Universitário Pedro Ernesto, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - Ana Maria Roselino
- Department of Medical Clinics, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
| | - Danielle Santana Mello
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital Universitário Pedro Ernesto, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | | | - Paula Figueiredo de Marsillac
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital Universitário Pedro Ernesto, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - Adriana Maria Porro
- Department of Dermatology, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Mahé A. [What's new in clinical dermatology?]. Ann Dermatol Venereol 2019; 145 Suppl 7:VIIS1-VIIS10. [PMID: 30583751 DOI: 10.1016/s0151-9638(18)31283-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
In this article, we performed a review of all new data of clinical relevance for the dermatologists that were published in the medical literature between September, 2017 and September, 2018. Besides advances that will be useful in day-to-day dermatological practice, we intended to give a more general perspective to this review by taking into account certain international health issues that might in final concern each of us in a globalized world. Focus were more particularly done on the following topics: infectious diseases (including sexually transmitted infections), neglected tropical diseases, adverse effects of drugs, bullous diseases, allergology, wound healing, dermatology on black skin, and public health dermatology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Mahé
- Service de dermatologie, hôpital Louis-Pasteur, 68024 Colmar cedex, France.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Lamberts A, Rashid H, Pas HH, Diercks GFH, Meijer JM, Horváth B. Pemphigoid variants affecting the skin. Clin Exp Dermatol 2019; 44:721-727. [PMID: 31099084 DOI: 10.1111/ced.13984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Pemphigoid diseases are autoimmune subepidermal blistering diseases affecting the skin and mucous membranes, which are caused by autoantibodies targeting structural hemidesmosomal proteins or hemidesmosome-associated proteins. Variants of pemphigoid can be differentiated based on targeted antigens and clinical aspects. In this review, we will discuss pemphigoid variants that predominantly affect the skin, and provide clinicians with clues to diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Lamberts
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - H Rashid
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - H H Pas
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - G F H Diercks
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.,Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - J M Meijer
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - B Horváth
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
Epidermolysis bullosa acquisita (EBA) is a rare acquired subepidermal bullous autoimmune dermatosis, associated with autoantibodies against collagen type VII, the most important component of dermal anchoring fibrils. Blister induction occurs after binding of autoantibodies to collagen type VII, leading to complement activation, recruitment of neutrophils and secretion of proteases. Clinically, the disease is mostly characterized by tense blisters on trauma-exposed body areas which heal with scarring (mechanobullous form of EBA). The second most frequent subtype of EBA is inflammatory EBA, a bullous pemphigoid-like disease associated with pruritus. Involvement of mucous membranes and/or lesions in the head and neck area additionally point to the diagnosis of EBA. The mechanobullous type of EBA and EBA with intensive mucous membrane lesions display a chronic course and are often extremely resistant to therapy. Topical and systemic glucocorticoids, dapsone, colchicine, classical immunosuppressants, anti-CD20 antibodies, immunoadsorption or intravenous immunoglobulins have been reported as treatments.
Collapse
|
32
|
Abstract
Pemphigoid diseases (PDs) are a group of autoimmune bullous diseases characterized and caused by autoantibodies targeting structural proteins of the skin and mucous membranes. Chronic inflammation, subepidermal blistering, and often scaring are the clinical characteristics of PDs. Itching and, in severe cases, disabilities resulting from scaring (i.e., blindness, esophageal strictures) are the leading subjective symptoms. Treatment of PDs, which is based on nonspecific immunosuppression, is challenging because of frequent relapses, lack of efficacy, and numerous adverse events. In addition, the incidence of PDs is increasing. Given the high morbidity, limited therapeutic options, and increasing incidence, there is a growing urgency for drug discovery to help treat this condition. The recent development of PD model systems has added to the understanding of PD pathogenesis and, based on these insights, new clinical trials will soon be launched. The (auto-)antibody transfer PD models allow for investigations into autoantibody-mediated tissue pathology, while immunization-induced PD models more closely resemble the clinical situation. The latter duplicate all aspects of the human disease and are useful for investigating PD pathogenesis and testing therapeutic interventions. This article describes antibody transfer and immunization-induced PD mouse models currently employed for translational PD research. © 2019 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anika Kasprick
- Lübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Katja Bieber
- Lübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Ralf J Ludwig
- Lübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Koga H, Prost-Squarcioni C, Iwata H, Jonkman MF, Ludwig RJ, Bieber K. Epidermolysis Bullosa Acquisita: The 2019 Update. Front Med (Lausanne) 2019; 5:362. [PMID: 30687710 PMCID: PMC6335340 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2018] [Accepted: 12/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Epidermolysis bullosa acquisita (EBA) is an orphan autoimmune disease. Patients with EBA suffer from chronic inflammation as well as blistering and scarring of the skin and mucous membranes. Current treatment options rely on non-specific immunosuppression, which in many cases, does not lead to a remission of treatment. Hence, novel treatment options are urgently needed for the care of EBA patients. During the past decade, decisive clinical observations, and frequent use of pre-clinical model systems have tremendously increased our understanding of EBA pathogenesis. Herein, we review all of the aspects of EBA, starting with a detailed description of epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and current treatment options. Of note, pattern analysis via direct immunofluorescence microscopy of a perilesional skin lesion and novel serological test systems have significantly facilitated diagnosis of the disease. Next, a state-of the art review of the current understanding of EBA pathogenesis, emerging treatments and future perspectives is provided. Based on pre-clinical model systems, cytokines and kinases are among the most promising therapeutic targets, whereas high doses of IgG (IVIG) and the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab are among the most promising "established" EBA therapeutics. We also aim to raise awareness of EBA, as well as initiate basic and clinical research in this field, to further improve the already improved but still unsatisfactory conditions for those diagnosed with this condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroshi Koga
- Department of Dermatology, Kurume University School of Medicine, and Kurume University Institute of Cutaneous Cell Biology, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Catherine Prost-Squarcioni
- Department of Dermatology, APHP, Avicenne Hospital, Referral Center for Autoimmune Bullous Diseases, Bobigny, France
| | - Hiroaki Iwata
- Department of Dermatology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Marcel F Jonkman
- Department of Dermatology, Center for Blistering Diseases, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Ralf J Ludwig
- Lübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Katja Bieber
- Lübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Witte M, Zillikens D, Schmidt E. Diagnosis of Autoimmune Blistering Diseases. Front Med (Lausanne) 2018; 5:296. [PMID: 30450358 PMCID: PMC6224342 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2018] [Accepted: 10/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Autoimmune skin blistering diseases (AIBD) are characterized by autoantibodies that are directed against structural proteins in the skin and adjacent mucous membranes. Some clinical signs are typical for a specific AIBD, however, correct diagnosis requires the detection of tissue-bound or circulating autoantibodies. The gold standard for diagnosis of AIBD is the detection of autoantibodies or complement component 3 by direct immunofluorescence (DIF) microscopy of a perilesional biopsy. Circulating antibodies can be detected via indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) microscopy of different tissue substrates including human skin, monkey esophagus, and more recently, recombinant forms of the different target antigens. Latter are also employed in various commercial ELISA systems and by immunoblotting in in-house assays available in specialized laboratories. ELISA systems are also particularly valuable for monitoring of the disease activity during the disease course which can be helpful for treatment decisions. Exact diagnosis is essential for both treatment and prognosis, since some AIBD are associated with malign tumors such as paraneoplastic pemphigus and anti-laminin 332 mucous membrane pemphigoid. This review presents clinical and immunopathological features of AIBD for the state-of the art diagnosis of these disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mareike Witte
- Department of Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Detlef Zillikens
- Department of Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Enno Schmidt
- Department of Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
[85-year-old male with cutaneous blisters : Preparation for the medical specialist examination: Part 25]. Hautarzt 2018; 69:183-188. [PMID: 30374540 DOI: 10.1007/s00105-018-4291-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
36
|
Solimani F, Pollmann R, Ishii N, Eming R, Hashimoto T, Schmidt T, Hertl M. Diagnosis of anti-laminin γ-1 pemphigoid by immunoblot analysis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2018; 33:735-741. [PMID: 29972879 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.15170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2018] [Accepted: 06/01/2018] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anti-laminin-γ1 (lam-γ1) pemphigoid, a recently described immunobullous disorder sharing immune serological features of bullous pemphigoid and epidermolysis bullosa acquisita (EBA), is characterized by the detection of serum IgG autoantibodies against the lam-γ1 chain, a 200 kDa heterotrimeric component of the dermal-epidermal junction (DEJ). OBJECTIVE The aim of the study was to develop an easy-to-perform and reliable assay for the serological detection of anti-lam-γ1 IgG autoantibodies. The clinical appearance alone is not sufficient to establish diagnosis of anti-lam-γ1 pemphigoid and rather requires immune serological evidence of (i) IgG reactivity against the dermal portion of salt-split human skin; (ii) exclusion of IgG against other components of the DEJ; and (iii) IgG reactivity with a 200 kDa protein of dermal extracts by immunoblot analysis (IB). METHODS The sera of 55 patients with anti-lam-γ1 pemphigoid were tested by IB with two recombinant heterotrimers, laminin 111 (lam-111) and laminin 421 (lam-421), as well as with a recombinant lam-γ1 chain monomer. Additionally, a total of 41 control sera from patients with EBA (n = 15), psoriasis vulgaris (PV; n = 14), and healthy controls (HC; n = 12) were tested. RESULTS Immunoblot analysis revealed a positive reactivity with lam-111 and/or lam-421 in 46/55 (84%) of anti-lam-γ1 pemphigoid sera. Moreover, 8/9 of the initially non-reactive sera were positive with the lam-γ1 monomer, leading to an overall sensitivity of 98.2%. Analyses of 41 control sera with the three lam-γ1 recombinants led to a specificity of 88%. Specifically, 3/15 EBA sera, 1/14 PV serum and 1/12 HC serum reacted with the lam-γ1 monomer while only the 3 EBA sera reacted with lam-421. CONCLUSIONS Here we show a novel two-step IB assay using the two recombinant laminin trimers and lam-γ1 chain monomer for the detection of anti-lam-γ1 serum IgG with high sensitivity and specificity. This assay will facilitate the diagnosis and further characterization of this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Solimani
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Philipps-University, Marburg, Germany
| | - R Pollmann
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Philipps-University, Marburg, Germany
| | - N Ishii
- Kurume University Institute of Cutaneous Cell Biology, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - R Eming
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Philipps-University, Marburg, Germany
| | - T Hashimoto
- Kurume University Institute of Cutaneous Cell Biology, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan.,Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Asahimachi, Abeno, Osaka, Japan
| | - T Schmidt
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Philipps-University, Marburg, Germany
| | - M Hertl
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Philipps-University, Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|