Knowledge and opinions among Canadian academic physicians regarding genetic screening to prevent severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions

Pharmacogenomic-based personalized medicine: Multistakeholder perspectives on implementational drivers and barriers in the Canadian healthcare system

Pharmacogenomics (PGx)-based personalized medicine (PM) is increasingly utilized to guide treatment decisions for many drug-disease combinations. Notably, London Health Sciences Centre (LHSC) has pioneered a PGx program that has become a staple for London-based specialists. Although implementational studies have been conducted in other jurisdictions, the Canadian healthcare system is understudied. Herein, the multistakeholder perspectives on implementational drivers and barriers are elucidated. Using a mixed-method qualitative model, key stakeholders, and patients from LHSC's PGx-based PM clinic were interviewed and surveyed, respectively. Interview transcripts were thematically analyzed in a stepwise process of customer profiling, value mapping, and business model canvasing. Value for LHSC located specialist users of PGx was driven by the quick turnaround time, independence of the PGx clinic, and the quality of information. Engagement of external specialists was only limited by access and awareness, whereas other healthcare nonusers were limited by education and applicability. The major determinant of successful adoption at novel sites were institutional champions. Patients valued and approved of the service, expressed a general willingness to pay, but often traveled far to receive genotyping. This paper discusses the critical pillars of education, awareness, advocacy, and efficiency required to address implementation barriers to healthcare service innovation in Canada. Further adoption of PGx practices into Canadian hospitals is an important factor for advancing system-level changes in care delivery, patient experiences, and outcomes. The findings in this paper can help inform efforts to advance clinical PGx practices, but also the potential adoption and implementation of other innovative healthcare service solutions.

Severe cutaneous adverse reaction associated with antiseizure medications: Diagnosis, management, and prevention

Severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) are potentially life-threatening, with considerable morbidity and mortality. They are nonimmediate hypersensitivity reactions that occur in specifically predisposed patients with delayed T-cell-mediated hypersensitivity reaction. Antiseizure medications (ASMs) are among the drugs that can induce SCAR. Increased awareness of SCAR among clinicians treating patients with ASMs is critically important for early recognition of symptoms, prompt identification and removal of the causal drug, and early intervention to reduce SCAR-related acute and long-term morbidity and mortality. The diagnosis, management, and prevention of Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), and drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) are reviewed, along with the current understanding of the pathomechanisms and role of genetics in SCAR development. Supportive care and immunomodulating treatments for SCAR are discussed.

Retrospective Study of Patients With SJS/TEN Treated at a Tertiary Burn Unit in Canada: Overview of 17 Years of Treatment

BACKGROUND

Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are adverse drug reactions.

OBJECTIVES

To learn about the clinical characteristics of patients with SJS/TEN including treatments provided, outcomes, and mortality.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients who were hospitalized with the diagnosis of SJS/TEN at the Ross Tilley Burn Center between the years 1999 and 2015.

RESULTS

A total of 43 patients were identified with a mean age of 54 ± 19 (58, 18-85). The most common offending medications were allopurinol and carbamazepine. The overall mortality rate in our study is 21% with the most common causes of death being multiorgan failure and sepsis. The majority of our patients had oral (84%), ocular (79%), and genital (60%) involvement during hospitalization. Our data revealed that combination treatment involving oral corticosteroids with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) had the highest mortality rate in our study since 55% (6/11) of patients who were treated in this manner passed away compared to 11% (2/18) of patients passing away who were treated with solely IVIG and 33% (1/3) who were treated with only supportive care. Our study also demonstrates the addition of etanercept and cyclosporine treatment in the second time period we studied: 2008-2015 versus the earlier time period of 1999-2007. None of the patients in our study who were treated with therapies including cyclosporine and/or etanercept passed away.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study sheds light on a possible beneficial role of cyclosporine and etanercept for the treatment of SJS and TEN and reinforces the necessity of a multidisciplinary care team for patients.