The role of corticosterone in nevirapine-induced idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury

Nevirapine, an antiretroviral used in the treatment of HIV, is associated with idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (IDILI), a potentially life-threatening adverse drug reaction. Its usage has decreased due to this concern, but it is still widely used in lower-resource settings. In general, the mechanisms underlying idiosyncratic drug reactions (IDRs) are poorly understood, but evidence indicates that most are immune-mediated. There is very limited understanding of the early immune response following administration of drugs associated with IDRs, which likely occurs due to reactive metabolite formation. In this work, we aimed to characterize the links between covalent binding of nevirapine, the development of an early immune response, and the subsequent liver injury using a mouse model. We describe initial attempts to characterize an early immune response to nevirapine followed by the discovery that nevirapine induced the release of corticosterone. Corticosterone release was partially associated with the degree of drug covalent binding in the liver but was also likely mediated by additional mechanisms at higher drug doses. Transcriptomic analysis confirmed metabolic activation, glucocorticoid signaling, and decreased immune activation; GDF-15 also warrants further investigation as part of the immune response to nevirapine. Finally, glucocorticoid blockade preceding the first dose of nevirapine attenuated nevirapine-induced liver injury at 3 weeks, suggesting that acute glucocorticoid signaling is harmful in the context of nevirapine-induced liver injury. This work demonstrates that nevirapine induces acute corticosterone release, which contributes to delayed-onset liver injury. It also has implications for screening drug candidates for IDILI risk and preventing nevirapine-induced IDILI.

The development and characterization of a CRISPR/Cas9-mediated PD-1 functional knockout rat as a tool to study idiosyncratic drug reactions

Idiosyncratic drug reactions are rare but serious adverse drug reactions unrelated to the known therapeutic properties of the drug and manifest in only a small percentage of the treated population. Animal models play an important role in advancing mechanistic studies examining idiosyncratic drug reactions. However, to be useful, they must possess similarities to those seen clinically. Although mice currently represent the dominant mammalian genetic model, rats are advantageous in many areas of pharmacologic study where their physiology can be examined in greater detail and is more akin to that seen in humans. In the area of immunology, this includes autoimmune responses and susceptibility to diabetes, in which rats more accurately mimic disease states in humans compared with mice. For example, oral nevirapine treatment can induce an immune-mediated skin rash in humans and rats, but not in mice due to the absence of the sulfotransferase required to form reactive metabolites of nevirapine within the skin. Using CRISPR-mediated gene editing, we developed a modified line of transgenic rats in which a segment of IgG-like ectodomain containing the core PD-1 interaction motif containing the native ligand and therapeutic antibody domain in exon 2 was deleted. Removal of this region critical for mediating PD-1/PD-L1 interactions resulted in animals with an increased immune response resulting in liver injury when treated with amodiaquine.

Involvement of Extracellular Vesicles in the Proinflammatory Response to Clozapine: Implications for Clozapine-Induced Agranulocytosis

Most idiosyncratic drug reactions (IDRs) appear to be immune-mediated, but mechanistic events preceding severe reaction onset remain poorly defined. Damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) may contribute to both innate and adaptive immune phases of IDRs, and changes in extracellular vesicle (EV) cargo have been detected post-exposure to several IDR-associated drugs. To explore the hypothesis that EVs are also a source of DAMPs in the induction of the immune response preceding drug-induced agranulocytosis, the proteome and immunogenicity of clozapine- (agranulocytosis-associated drug) and olanzapine- (non-agranulocytosis-associated drug) exposed EVs were compared in two preclinical models: THP-1 macrophages and Sprague-Dawley rats. Compared with olanzapine, clozapine induced a greater increase in the concentration of EVs enriched from both cell culture media and rat serum. Moreover, treatment of drug-naïve THP-1 cells with clozapine-exposed EVs induced an inflammasome-dependent response, supporting a potential role for EVs in immune activation. Proteomic and bioinformatic analyses demonstrated an increased number of differentially expressed proteins with clozapine that were enriched in pathways related to inflammation, myeloid cell chemotaxis, wounding, transforming growth factor-β signaling, and negative regulation of stimuli response. These data indicate that, although clozapine and olanzapine exposure both alter the protein cargo of EVs, clozapine-exposed EVs carry mediators that exhibit significantly greater immunogenicity. Ultimately, this supports the working hypothesis that drugs associated with a risk of IDRs induce cell stress, release of proinflammatory mediators, and early immune activation that precedes severe reaction onset. Further studies characterizing EVs may elucidate biomarkers that predict IDR risk during development of drug candidates. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This work demonstrates that clozapine, an idiosyncratic drug-induced agranulocytosis (IDIAG)-associated drug, but not olanzapine, a safer structural analogue, induces an acute proinflammatory response and increases extracellular vesicle (EV) release in two preclinical models. Moreover, clozapine-exposed EVs are more immunogenic, as measured by their ability to activate inflammasomes, and contain more differentially expressed proteins, highlighting a novel role for EVs during the early immune response to clozapine and enhancing our mechanistic understanding of IDIAG and other idiosyncratic reactions.

Potential Involvement of Sulfotransferase in the Mechanism of Lamotrigine-induced Skin Rash

The mechanism of drug-induced skin rash is not well understood. Circumstantial evidence suggests that the covalent binding of a reactive metabolite is involved in the mechanism of most idiosyncratic drug reactions. However, there is a limited quantity of drug metabolizing enzymes in the skin, except for sulfotransferases. It is possible that some drugs are metabolized to reactive sulfate metabolites that are responsible for skin rashes. For example, nevirapine-induced skin rash involves metabolism of nevirapine to 12-hydroxy-nevirapine, which is further metabolized by sulfotransferase in the skin to a reactive benzylic sulfate that covalently binds to proteins. The working hypothesis is that lamotrigine, valdecoxib, and sertraline skin rashes involve the formation of reactive sulfate in the skin. Lamotrigine-N-oxide, hydroxy-valdecoxib, and hydroxy-sertraline were tested as substrates with known human sulfotransferases. Hydroxy-valdecoxib and the benzylic alcohol metabolite of sertraline were not substrates for human sulfotransferases. Therefore, this pathway is presumably not involved in the mechanism by which they cause skin rashes. In contrast, lamotrigine-N-oxide is a substrate for several human sulfotransferases and the sulfate is chemically reactive. Furthermore, lamotrigine-N-sulfate not only alkylates proteins as we described previously but also forms the sulfate of tyrosine, suggesting another possible mechanism for protein modification. This study has further added to the understanding of the potential of the sulfotransferase pathways and protein sulfation to play a role in drug-induced skin rash.

Sulfation of 12-hydroxy-nevirapine by human SULTs and the effects of genetic polymorphisms of SULT1A1 and SULT2A1

Nevirapine (NVP) is an effective drug for the treatment of HIV infections, but its use is limited by a high incidence of severe skin rash and liver injury. 12-Hydroxynevirapine (12-OH-NVP) is the major metabolite of nevirapine. There is strong evidence that the sulfate of 12-OH-NVP is responsible for the skin rash. While several cytosolic sulfotransferases (SULTs) have been shown to be capable of sulfating 12-OH-NVP, the exact mechanism of sulfation in vivo is unclear. The current study aimed to clarify human SULT(s) and human organs that are capable of sulfating 12-OH-NVP and investigate the metabolic sulfation of 12-OH-NVP using cultured HepG2 human hepatoma cells. Enzymatic assays revealed that of the thirteen human SULTs, SULT1A1 and SULT2A1 displayed strong 12-OH-NVP-sulfating activity. 1-Phenyl-1-hexanol (PHHX), which applied topically prevents the skin rash in rats, inhibited 12-OH-NVP sulfation by SULT1A1 and SULT2A1, implying the involvement of these two enzymes in the sulfation of 12-OH-NVP in vivo. Among five human organ cytosols analyzed, liver cytosol displayed the strongest 12-OH-NVP-sulfating activity, while a low but significant activity was detected with skin cytosol. Cultured HepG2 cells were shown to be capable of sulfating 12-OH-NVP. The effects of genetic polymorphisms of SULT1A1 and SULT2A1 genes on the sulfation of 12-OH-NVP by SULT1A1 and SULT2A1 allozymes were investigated. Two SULT1A1 allozymes, Arg37Asp and Met223Val, showed no detectable 12-OH-NVP-sulfating activity, while a SULT2A1 allozyme, Met57Thr, displayed significantly higher 12-OH-NVP-sulfating activity compared with the wild-type enzyme. Collectively, these results contribute to a better understanding of the involvement of sulfation in NVP-induced skin rash and provide clues to the possible role of SULT genetic polymorphisms in the risk of this adverse reaction.

Idiosyncratic Drug Reactions: A 35-Year Chemical Research in Toxicology Perspective

When Larry Marnett founded Chemical Research in Toxicology, the study of idiosyncratic drug reactions (IDRs) was in its infancy. There was evidence that IDRs involve chemically reactive metabolites, and many of the papers in Chemical Research in Toxicology investigated the bioactivation of drugs. However, it became clear that not all drugs that form reactive metabolites are associated with a high risk of IDRs, and some drugs that do not appear to form reactive metabolites do cause IDRs. Some of the early Chemical Research in Toxicology papers investigated involvement of the adaptive immune system in the mechanism of IDRs, and HLA associations provided strong evidence for an immune mechanism of IDRs. This led to the question of how reactive metabolites might induce an immune response. The classic hapten hypothesis provided an obvious explanation, but a new hypothesis the danger hypothesis, added another dimension. Although there are common features to IDRs, it is becoming increasingly clear that there are also many differences in the mechanisms caused by different drugs. Other pharmacological effects of drugs may also play a role in the mechanism, and that is obviously true of IDRs caused by biological agents. The requirement for specific HLA and T-cell receptors is presumably the major factor that makes IDRs idiosyncratic. However, an innate immune response is required to prime the adaptive immune response. In contrast to the adaptive immune response, the innate immune response is unlikely to be idiosyncratic, and studies of the innate immune response to drugs may provide a much more accurate way to screen drugs for their potential to cause IDRs. For essential drugs that are known to cause IDRs, it may be possible to markedly decrease risk by a slow dose titration to induce immune tolerance. Significant progress has been made in the study of IDRs, but there is still a long way to go.

Clozapine induces an acute proinflammatory response that is attenuated by inhibition of inflammasome signaling: implications for idiosyncratic drug-induced agranulocytosis

Although clozapine is a highly efficacious schizophrenia treatment, it is under-prescribed due to the risk of idiosyncratic drug-induced agranulocytosis (IDIAG). Clinical data indicate that most patients starting clozapine experience a transient immune response early in treatment and a similar response has been observed in clozapine-treated rats, but the mechanism by which clozapine triggers this transient inflammation remains unclear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to characterize the role of inflammasome activation during the early immune response to clozapine using in vitro and in vivo models. In both differentiated and nondifferentiated human monocytic THP-1 cells, clozapine, but not its structural analogues fluperlapine and olanzapine, caused inflammasome-dependent caspase-1 activation and IL-1β release that was inhibited using the caspase-1 inhibitor yVAD-cmk. In Sprague Dawley rats, a single dose of clozapine caused an increase in circulating neutrophils and a decrease in lymphocytes within hours of drug administration along with transient spikes in the proinflammatory mediators IL-1β, CXCL1, and TNF-α in the blood, spleen, and bone marrow. Blockade of inflammasome signaling using the caspase-1 inhibitor VX-765 or the IL-1 receptor antagonist anakinra attenuated this inflammatory response. These data indicate that caspase-1-dependent IL-1β production is fundamental for the induction of the early immune response to clozapine and, furthermore, support the general hypothesis that inflammasome activation is a common mechanism by which drugs associated with the risk of idiosyncratic reactions trigger early immune system activation. Ultimately, inhibition of inflammasome signaling may reduce the risk of IDIAG, enabling safer, more frequent use of clozapine in patients.

Mechanism of idiosyncratic drug induced liver injury (DILI): unresolved basic issues

Clinical features of idiosyncratic drug induced liver injury (DILI) are well described in cases that have been assessed for causality using the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM), but our understanding of the mechanistic steps leading to injury is fragmentary. The difficulties describing mechanistic events can be traced back to the lack of an animal model of experimental idiosyncratic DILI that can mimic the genetic requirements of human idiosyncratic DILI. However, immune tolerance plays a dominant role in the immune response of the liver, and impairment of immune tolerance with immune checkpoint inhibitors increases DILI in both humans and animals. This may provide one method to study the individual steps involved. In general. the human DILI liver is a secret keeper providing little insight into what occurs in the diseased organ. Sufficient evidence exists that most idiosyncratic cases are mediated by the adaptive immune system, which depends on stimulation of the innate immune system, but the triggering factors are unknown. It is attractive to hypothesize that the gut microbiome plays a role; however, it is very difficult to study. Similarly, exosomes are likely to play an important role in communication between hepatic cells and the immune system, but there is a lack of data on blood exosomes in affected patients. Reactive metabolites are likely to play an important role. This is supported by the current analysis, which revealed an association between metabolism by cytochrome P450 and drugs most commonly involved in causing idiosyncratic DILI with causality verified by RUCAM. Circumstantial evidence suggests that reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated by cytochrome P450 could be responsible for the initial steps of injury, but details are unknown. In conclusion, most of the mechanistic steps leading to idiosyncratic DILI remain unclear.

Severe cutaneous adverse reaction associated with antiseizure medications: Diagnosis, management, and prevention

Severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) are potentially life-threatening, with considerable morbidity and mortality. They are nonimmediate hypersensitivity reactions that occur in specifically predisposed patients with delayed T-cell-mediated hypersensitivity reaction. Antiseizure medications (ASMs) are among the drugs that can induce SCAR. Increased awareness of SCAR among clinicians treating patients with ASMs is critically important for early recognition of symptoms, prompt identification and removal of the causal drug, and early intervention to reduce SCAR-related acute and long-term morbidity and mortality. The diagnosis, management, and prevention of Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), and drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) are reviewed, along with the current understanding of the pathomechanisms and role of genetics in SCAR development. Supportive care and immunomodulating treatments for SCAR are discussed.

Idiosyncratic Drug-Induced Liver Injury: Mechanistic and Clinical Challenges

Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (IDILI) remains a significant problem for patients and drug development. The idiosyncratic nature of IDILI makes mechanistic studies difficult, and little is known of its pathogenesis for certain. Circumstantial evidence suggests that most, but not all, IDILI is caused by reactive metabolites of drugs that are bioactivated by cytochromes P450 and other enzymes in the liver. Additionally, there is overwhelming evidence that most IDILI is mediated by the adaptive immune system; one example being the association of IDILI caused by specific drugs with specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) haplotypes, and this may in part explain the idiosyncratic nature of these reactions. The T cell receptor repertoire likely also contributes to the idiosyncratic nature. Although most of the liver injury is likely mediated by the adaptive immune system, specifically cytotoxic CD8+ T cells, adaptive immune activation first requires an innate immune response to activate antigen presenting cells and produce cytokines required for T cell proliferation. This innate response is likely caused by either a reactive metabolite or some form of cell stress that is clinically silent but not idiosyncratic. If this is true it would make it possible to study the early steps in the immune response that in some patients can lead to IDILI. Other hypotheses have been proposed, such as mitochondrial injury, inhibition of the bile salt export pump, unfolded protein response, and oxidative stress although, in most cases, it is likely that they are also involved in the initiation of an immune response rather than representing a completely separate mechanism. Using the clinical manifestations of liver injury from a number of examples of IDILI-associated drugs, this review aims to summarize and illustrate these mechanistic hypotheses.

Investigating the Mechanism of Trimethoprim-Induced Skin Rash and Liver Injury

Trimethoprim (TMP)-induced skin rash and liver injury are likely to involve the formation of reactive metabolites. Analogous to nevirapine-induced skin rash, 1 possible reactive metabolite is the sulfate conjugate of α-hydroxyTMP, a metabolite of TMP. We synthesized this sulfate and found that it reacts with proteins in vitro. We produced a TMP-antiserum and found covalent binding of TMP in the liver of TMP-treated rats. However, we found that α-hydroxyTMP is not a substrate for human sulfotransferases, and we did not detect covalent binding in the skin of TMP-treated rats. Although less reactive than the sulfate, α-hydroxyTMP was found to covalently bind to liver and skin proteins in vitro. Even though there was covalent binding to liver proteins, TMP did not cause liver injury in rats or in our impaired immune tolerance mouse model that has been able to unmask the ability of other drugs to cause immune-mediated liver injury. This is likely because there was much less covalent binding of TMP in the livers of TMP-treated mice than TMP-treated rats. It is possible that some patients have a sulfotransferase that can produce the reactive benzylic sulfate; however, α-hydroxyTMP, itself, has sufficient reactivity to covalently bind to proteins in the skin and may be responsible for TMP-induced skin rash. Interspecies and interindividual differences in TMP metabolism may be 1 factor that determines the risk of TMP-induced skin rash. This study provides important data required to understand the mechanism of TMP-induced skin rash and drug-induced skin rash in general.

Testing Possible Risk Factors for Idiosyncratic Drug-Induced Liver Injury Using an Amodiaquine Mouse Model and Co-treatment with 1-Methyl-d-Tryptophan or Acetaminophen

Idiosyncratic drug reactions are unpredictable adverse reactions. Although most such adverse reactions appear to be immune mediated, their exact mechanism(s) remain elusive. The idiosyncratic drug reaction most associated with serious consequences is idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (IDILI). We have developed a mouse model of amodiaquine (AQ)-induced liver injury that reflects the clinical characteristics of IDILI in humans. This was accomplished by impairing immune tolerance by using PD-1^-/- mice and an antibody against CTLA-4. PD-1 and CTLA-4 are known negative regulators of lymphocyte activation, which promote immune tolerance. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have become important tools for the treatment of cancer. However, as in our model, immune checkpoint inhibitors increase the risk of IDILI with drugs that have an incidence of causing liver injury. Agents such as 1-methyl-d-tryptophan (D-1-MT), an inhibitor of the immunosuppressive indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) enzyme, have also been proposed as anti-cancer treatments. Another possible risk factor for the induction of an immune response is the release of danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). Acetaminophen (APAP) is known to cause acute liver injury, and it is likely to cause the release of DAMPs. Therefore, either of these agents could increase the risk of IDILI, although through different mechanisms. If true, then this would have clinical implications. We found that co-treatment with D-1-MT paradoxically decreased liver injury in our model, and although APAP appeared to slightly increase AQ-induced liver injury, the difference was not significant. Such results highlight the complexity of the immune response, which makes potential interactions difficult to predict.

Liver Injury Caused by Green Tea Extract in PD-1-/- Mice: An Impaired Immune Tolerance Model for Idiosyncratic Drug-Induced Liver Injury

Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (IDILI) is an idiosyncratic drug reaction that is specific to an individual and can lead to liver failure and even death. The mechanism of IDILI remains poorly understood, but most IDILI appears to be immune-mediated. We have developed the first validated animal model by using a PD-1^-/- mouse model in combination with anti-CTLA-4 to block immune checkpoints and impair immune tolerance. Treatment of these mice with drugs that cause IDILI in humans led to delayed-onset liver injury with characteristics similar to IDILI in humans. The current study investigates the effects of green tea extract, a weight-loss dietary supplement that has been reported to cause IDILI in humans. Green tea extracts contain a highly variable content of catechins including (-)-epigallocatechin gallate, the major catechin in green tea formulations. If the liver injury caused by green tea extract in humans is immune-mediated, it may occur in our impaired immune tolerance model. Female PD-1^-/- mice treated with anti-CTLA-4 antibody and green tea extract (500 mg/kg), a dose that is considered a no-observed-adverse-effect level for liver in rodents, produced a delayed onset increase in serum alanine transaminase levels and an increase in hepatic CD8⁺ T cells. In contrast, the response in male PD-1^-/- mice was less pronounced, and there was no evidence of liver injury in wild-type mice. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that the IDILI caused by green tea extract is immune-mediated and is similar to IDILI caused by medications that are associated with IDILI.

Mechanistic Studies of Idiosyncratic DILI: Clinical Implications

The idiosyncratic nature of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (IDILI) makes mechanistic studies very difficult, and little is known with certainty. However, the fact that the IDILI caused by some drugs is associated with specific HLA genotypes provides strong evidence that it is mediated by the adaptive immune system. This is also consistent with the histology and the general characteristics of IDILI. However, there are other mechanistic hypotheses. Various in vitro and in vivo systems have been used to test hypotheses. Two other hypotheses are mitochondrial injury and inhibition of the bile salt export pump. It is possible that these mechanisms are responsible for some cases of IDILI or that these mechanisms are complementary and are involved in initiating an immune response. In general, it is believed that the initiation of an immune response requires activation of antigen-presenting cells by molecules such as danger-associated molecular pattern molecules (DAMPs). An attractive hypothesis for the mechanism by which DAMPs induce an immune response is through the activation of inflammasomes. The dominant immune response in the liver is immune tolerance, and it is only when immune tolerance fails that significant liver injury occurs. Consistent with this concept, an animal model was developed in which immune checkpoint inhibition unmasked the ability of drugs to cause liver injury. Although it appears that the liver damage is mediated by the adaptive immune system, an innate immune response is required for an adaptive immune response. The innate immune response is not dependent on specific HLA genes or T cell receptors and may occur in most patients and animals treated with a drug that can cause IDILI. Studies of the subclinical innate immune response to drugs may provide important mechanistic clues and provide a method to screen drugs for their potential to cause IDILI.

Rotenone Increases Isoniazid Toxicity but Does Not Cause Significant Liver Injury: Implications for the Hypothesis that Inhibition of the Mitochondrial Electron Transport Chain Is a Common Mechanism of Idiosyncratic Drug-Induced Liver Injury

Idiosyncratic drug reactions (IDRs) significantly increase the risk of failure in drug development. The major IDR leading to drug candidate failure is idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (IDILI). Although most evidence suggests that IDRs are mediated by the immune system, there are other hypotheses, such as mitochondrial dysfunction. Many pharmaceutical companies routinely screen for mitochondrial toxicity in an attempt to "derisk" drug candidates. However, the basic hypothesis has never been rigorously tested. A major assay used for this screening involves measurement of inhibition of the mitochondrial electron transport chain. One study found that the combination of rotenone and isoniazid, which inhibit mitochondrial complex I and II, respectively, were synergistic in causing hepatocyte toxicity in vitro and suggested the combination of another drug that inhibited complex I would increase the risk of isoniazid-induced liver injury in patients. We tested this hypothesis in vivo where wild-type and PD-1-/- mice administered anti-CTLA-4, our impaired immune tolerance mouse model, were given 0.02% (w/v) rotenone in water or 0.1%, 0.05%, and 0.01% (w/w) rotenone alone or in combination with isoniazid in food. The cotreatment led to lethality in 100% of the animals receiving 0.1% rotenone and 0.2% isoniazid and 83% of the animals cotreated with 0.05% rotenone and 0.2% isoniazid in food. Nevertheless, there was no significant increase in GLDH or histological evidence of liver injury. No signs of toxicity were observed in any of the mice given rotenone or isoniazid alone. Even though inhibition of the mitochondrial electron transport chain did not lead to significant liver toxicity, it could provide danger signals that promote immune-mediated liver injury. However, rotenone did not significantly increase the liver injury induced by isoniazid in our impaired immune tolerance model. Overall, we conclude that inhibition of the mitochondrial electron transport chain is not a significant mechanism of IDILI.

Editor's Highlight: An Impaired Immune Tolerance Animal Model Distinguishes the Potential of Troglitazone/Pioglitazone and Tolcapone/Entacapone to Cause IDILI

We have developed an animal model of amodiaquine-induced liver injury that has characteristics very similar to idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (IDILI) in humans by impairing immune tolerance using a PD1-/- mouse and cotreatment with anti-CTLA-4. In order to test the usefulness of this model as a general model for human IDILI risk, pairs of drugs with similar structures were tested, one of which is associated with a relatively high risk of IDILI and the other not. One such pair is troglitazone and pioglitazone; troglitazone has caused fatal cases of IDILI while pioglitazone is quite safe. Another pair is tolcapone and entacapone; tolcapone can cause serious IDILI; in contrast, although entacapone has been reported to cause liver injury, it is relatively safe. PD1-/- mice treated with anti-CTLA-4 and troglitazone or tolcapone displayed liver injury as determined by ALT levels and histology, while pioglitazone and entacapone showed less signs of liver injury. One possible mechanism by which drugs could induce an immune response leading to IDILI is by causing the release of danger-associated molecular pattern molecules that activate inflammasomes. We found that the supernatants from incubations of troglitazone, tolcapone, or entacapone with hepatocytes were also able to activate inflammasomes in macrophages, while the supernatant from pioglitazone incubations did not. These results are consistent with an immune mechanism for troglitazone- and tolcapone-induced IDILI and add to the evidence that this may be a general model for IDILI.

Involvement of CCL2/CCR2 macrophage recruitment in amodiaquine-induced liver injury

Evidence suggests that macrophages may play a role in the development of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (IDILI). However, there has yet to be a clear link between macrophage activation and the inflammatory infiltrate that is characteristic of IDILI. A major chemokine involved in the recruitment of macrophages into the liver is C-C motif chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2)/monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP1). Therefore, we tested the effect of this chemokine in an animal model of IDILI. Specifically, amodiaquine (AQ), which is known to cause IDILI in humans, causes mild liver injury in wild-type C57BL/6 mice that resolves despite continued AQ treatment, but it causes more severe liver injury that does not resolve in PD-1^-/- mice co-treated with anti-CTLA-4 to impair immune tolerance. CCR2^-/- mice treated with AQ were not protected from the expected AQ-induced liver injury seen in wild-type C57BL/6 mice. In contrast, anti-CCL2 antibodies attenuated the liver injury caused by AQ in the impaired immune tolerance model. The difference in response of the two models is likely due to a difference in the IDILI mechanism; the mild injury in wild-type animals is mediated by NK cells, while the more serious injury in the impaired immune tolerance model requires CD8 T-cells. The results from these experiments provide evidence that macrophage infiltration into the liver may not be involved in mild IDILI mediated by the innate immune system, but it does appear necessary in more severe IDILI involving cytotoxic T-cells.

Use of an animal model to test whether non-alcoholic fatty liver disease increases the risk of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury

Clinical evidence suggests that most idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (IDILI) is immune-mediated. The danger hypothesis suggests that liver injury and inflammation would increase the risk of an immune response leading to IDILI. Therefore, a reasonable hypothesis would be that an underlying chronic liver disease such as non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) would increase the risk of developing IDILI due to inflammation and release of danger signals from damaged cells. In order to test this hypothesis, mice were fed a methionine-/choline-deficient (MCD) diet that produces a consistent NASH phenotype, along with amodiaquine (AQ) - a drug known to cause IDILI in humans. This study employed both wild-type C57BL/6 mice and PD-1^-/- mice co-treated with anti-CTLA-4 antibodies. The PD-1^-/- + anti-CTLA-4 model produces an immune-mediated liver injury very similar to the idiosyncratic liver injury observed in humans. The liver injury observed in the present experiment was dominated by the injury caused by the MCD diet; there was no significant difference between mice treated with the MCD diet alone and those also treated with AQ, whether in wild-type mice of the PD-1^-/- model. Therefore, the MCD diet, which results in a state that mimics NASH, did not appear to increase the liver injury associated with AQ treatment. Ultimately, an animal model is just that - only a model, and cannot provide a definitive answer to clinical questions. However, given the difficulty of performing clinical studies with appropriate control populations, the present results provide important evidence to support a general clinical finding that underlying liver injury does not usually increase the risk of IDILI.

The skin as a metabolic and immune-competent organ: Implications for drug-induced skin rash

Current advances in the study of cutaneous adverse drug reactions can be attributed to the recent understanding that the skin is both a metabolically and immunologically competent organ. The ability of the skin to serve as a protective barrier with limited drug biotransformation ability, yet highly active immune function, has provided insights into its biological capability. While the immune response of the skin to drugs is vastly different from that of the liver due to evolutionary conditioning, it frequently occurs in response to various drug classes and manifests as a spectrum of hypersensitivity reactions. The skin is a common site of adverse and idiosyncratic drug reactions; drug-specific T-cells, as well as involvement of an innate immune response, appear to be key mechanistic drivers in such scenarios. Association of other factors such as human leukocyte antigen (HLA) polymorphisms may play a significant role for particular drugs. This review aims to integrate emerging findings into proposed mechanisms of drug metabolism and immunity in the skin that are likely responsible for rashes and other local allergic responses. These unique biological aspects of the skin, and their translation into implications for drug development and the use of animal models, will be discussed.

Do In Vitro Assays Predict Drug Candidate Idiosyncratic Drug-Induced Liver Injury Risk?

In vitro assays are commonly used during drug discovery to try to decrease the risk of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (iDILI). But how effective are they at predicting risk? One of the most widely used methods evaluates cell cytotoxicity. Cytotoxicity assays that used cell lines that are very different from normal hepatocytes, and high concentrations of drug, were not very accurate at predicting idiosyncratic drug reaction risk. Even cytotoxicity assays that use more biologically normal cells resulted in many false-positive and false-negative results. Assays that quantify reactive metabolite formation, mitochondrial injury, and bile salt export pump (BSEP) inhibition have also been described. Although evidence suggests that reactive metabolite formation and BSEP inhibition can play a role in the mechanism of iDILI, these assays are not very accurate at predicting risk. In contrast, inhibition of the mitochondrial electron transport chain appears not to play an important role in the mechanism of iDILI, although other types of mitochondrial injury may do so. It is likely that there are many additional mechanisms by which drugs can cause iDILI. However, simply measuring more parameters is unlikely to provide better predictive assays unless those parameters are actually involved in the mechanism of iDILI. Hence, a better mechanistic understanding of iDILI is required; however, mechanistic studies of iDILI are very difficult. There is substantive evidence that most iDILI is immune mediated; therefore, the most accurate assays may involve those that determine immune responses to drugs. New methods to manipulate immune tolerance may greatly facilitate development of more suitable methods.

The Effects of Immune Modulators on Amodiaquine-Induced Liver Injury

If idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (IDILI) is immune mediated, then it is logical that immune modulators may be able to affect liver injury caused by a drug. We have previously shown that modulating the immune system by impairing programmed cell death protein (PD-1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) signaling, both receptors involved in immune tolerance, was capable of producing an animal model of amodiaquine (AQ) IDILI with characteristics very similar to IDILI in humans. Other immune modulators may also increase liver injury caused by drugs that cause IDILI in humans. In this study, myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β), and lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG3) were targeted with antibodies, with and without PD-1 and CTLA-4 impairment. We found that anti-Gr1 antibodies used to deplete MDSCs led to a significant increase in AQ-induced liver injury in wild-type mice; however, the injury was actually less in PD-1^-/- mice, with or without anti-CTLA-4, and it was less than we have previously observed in PD-1^-/- mice combined with anti-CTLA-4 without anti-Gr1. Addition of anti-LAG3 or anti-TGF-β antibodies produced a small increase ALT in AQ-treated wild-type mice. There was a significant increase in ALT in PD-1^-/- mice co-treated with anti-LAG3 or anti-TGF-β relative to AQ-treated wild-type mice. In the case of TGF-β, this was further increased by the addition of anti-CTLA-4, but if anything, there appeared to be a paradoxical decrease when anti-CTLA-4 was combined with anti-LAG3. Overall, the results from this study were not always as expected, and they highlight the complexity of the immune response, in particular immune tolerance, which appears to be the dominant immune response to drugs that cause IDILI.

Nevirapine-induced liver lipid-SER inclusions and other ultrastructural aberrations

Nevirapine (NVP) therapy is associated with a high risk of serious liver injury and skin rash. Treatment of Brown Norway rats with NVP causes an immune-mediated skin rash. Even though NVP does not cause serious liver injury in wildtype animals, incubation of hepatocytes with NVP leads to the release of presumably danger-associated molecular pattern molecules (DAMPs), which activate macrophages. In this study, we examined the liver biopsies of Brown Norway rats treated with NVP to determine the histologic correlate to the release of DAMPs by hepatocytes. In vivo, debris from necrotic hepatocytes and endothelial cells were present in the liver sinusoids, a condition that can trigger an immune response. In addition to mitochondrial, hepatocytic, and endothelial damage, the drug induced large hepatocytic inclusions composed of lipid droplets surrounded by concentric whorls of smooth endoplasmic reticulum (SER) cisternae-lipid-SER (LSER) inclusions, which were deposited in the sinusoids. NVP is lipid soluble, and these LSER inclusions may be sinks of NVP or its metabolites. LSERs are deposited in the blood stream where they may be picked up by lymph nodes and contribute to initiation of an immune response leading to serious liver injury or skin rash. LSERs migration from liver to the blood stream may signify a novel mechanism of drug exocytosis.

Effects of immunization and checkpoint inhibition on amodiaquine-induced liver injury

If idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (IDILI) is immune-mediated, it is possible that an individual's prior exposure to antigens may affect their susceptibility to IDILI. An individual's repertoire of memory immune cells is shaped by every past exposure to antigens. Subsequent drug-induced adverse drug reactions may therefore involve an immune cell's cross reactivity between a prior antigen and resulting drug-modified proteins. Therefore in this experiment, mice were immunized with amodiaquine (AQ)-modified hepatic proteins to mimic a previous exposure; treated with a RIBI adjuvant and anti-CD40 antibodies to stimulate an immune response; and, treated with anti-PD1 and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies prior to AQ treatment in order to overcome immune tolerance. This treatment led to greater liver injury than treatment with AQ alone. However, the mice did not develop serious liver injury. PD1^-/- mice were then immunized and treated with AQ and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies so that immune tolerance would be impaired, both during immunization and also during AQ treatment. However, even this did not result in liver failure, and the liver injury was not significantly increased relative to un-immunized PD1^-/- mice treated with anti-CTLA-4 and AQ. From these results we conclude that, although previous antigen exposure may affect the risk of IDILI, it appears that a very strong stimulus is required, and impairing immune tolerance remains the most effective method for producing an animal model of IDILI.

Dose-dependent acute liver injury with hypersensitivity features in humans due to a novel microsomal prostaglandin E synthase 1 inhibitor

AIMS

LY3031207, a novel microsomal prostaglandin E synthase 1 inhibitor, was evaluated in a multiple ascending dose study after nonclinical toxicology studies and a single ascending dose study demonstrated an acceptable toxicity, safety and tolerability profile.

METHODS

Healthy subjects were randomized to receive LY3031207 (25, 75 and 275 mg), placebo or celecoxib (400 mg) once daily for 28 days. The safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of LY3031207 were evaluated.

RESULTS

The study was terminated when two subjects experienced drug-induced liver injury (DILI) after they had received 225 mg LY3031207 for 19 days. Liver biopsy from these subjects revealed acute liver injury with eosinophilic infiltration. Four additional DILI cases were identified after LY3031207 dosing had been stopped. All six DILI cases shared unique presentations of hepatocellular injury with hypersensitivity features and demonstrated a steep dose-dependent trend. Prompt discontinuation of the study drug and supportive medical care resulted in full recovery. Metabolites from metabolic activation of the imidazole ring were observed in plasma and urine samples from all subjects randomized to LY3031207 dosing.

CONCLUSIONS

This study emphasized the importance of careful safety monitoring and serious adverse events management in phase I trials. Metabolic activation of the imidazole ring may be involved in the development of hepatotoxicity of LY3031207.

Supernatant from Hepatocyte Cultures with Drugs That Cause Idiosyncratic Liver Injury Activates Macrophage Inflammasomes

There is increasing evidence that most idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (IDILI) is immune mediated, and in most cases, reactive metabolites appear to be responsible for the induction of this immune response. Reactive metabolites can cause cell damage with the release of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), which is thought to be involved in immune activation. Presumably, the reason that the liver is a common target of idiosyncratic drug reactions is because it is the major site of drug metabolism and reactive metabolite formation. Inflammasomes can be activated by DAMPs, and this may be a common mechanism by which DAMPs initiate an immune response. In this study, we tested the ability of drugs to induce the release of DAMPs that activate inflammasomes. The drugs tested were amodiaquine and nevirapine; both are associated with significant incidences of severe IDILI. The hepatocytes were a human hepatocarcinoma functional liver cell-4 (FLC-4) cell line. For the detection of inflammasome activation, we used the human macrophage cell line, THP-1 cells. We found that the supernatant from the incubation of both drugs with FLC-4 cells for 7 days led to increased caspase-1 activity and production of IL-1β by THP-1 cells. However, amodiaquine alone also directly activated THP-1 cells. This is presumably because the myeloperoxidase in THP-1 cells can bioactivate amodiaquine to a reactive metabolite. In contrast, nevirapine requires cytochromes P450 for reactive metabolite formation and therefore required incubation with hepatocytes. These results support the hypothesis that reactive metabolites of drugs can cause the release of DAMPs, which in turn can activate inflammasomes. Inflammasome activation may be an important step in the activation of the immune system by drugs, which in some patients can lead to IDILI. Our in vitro model is simple and convenient for evaluating inflammasome activation, and this may be a method to screen drugs for IDILI risk.

Deferiprone-induced agranulocytosis: 20 years of clinical observations

Use of the iron chelator deferiprone for treatment of iron overload in thalassemia patients is associated with concerns over agranulocytosis, which requires weekly absolute neutrophil counts (ANC). Here, we analyze all episodes of agranulocytosis (n = 161) and neutropenia (n = 250) during deferiprone use in clinical trials (CT) and postmarketing surveillance programs (PMSP). Rates of agranulocytosis and neutropenia in CT were 1.5% and 5.5%, respectively. Of the agranulocytosis cases, 61% occurred during the first 6 months of therapy and 78% during the first year. These events appeared to be independent of dose, and occurred three times more often in females than males. Their duration was not significantly shortened by use of G‐CSF. No patient with baseline neutropenia (n = 12) developed agranulocytosis during treatment, which raises questions about the validity of prior neutropenia as a contraindication to use. Only 1/7 novel neutropenia cases in CT progressed to agranulocytosis with continued treatment, indicating that neutropenia does not necessarily lead to agranulocytosis. The agranulocytosis fatality rate was 0% in CT and 15/143 (11%) in PMSP. Rechallenge with deferiprone produced agranulocytosis in 75% of patients in whom the event had already occurred, and in 10% with previous neutropenia. Weekly ANC monitoring allows early detection and interruption of therapy, but does not prevent agranulocytosis from occurring. Its relevance appears to decrease after the first year of therapy, when agranulocytosis occurs less often. Based upon analysis of data collected over the past 20 years, it appears that patient education may be the key to minimizing agranulocytosis‐associated risks during deferiprone therapy. Am. J. Hematol. 91:1026–1031, 2016. © 2016 The Authors. American Journal of Hematology Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Exploring an animal model of amodiaquine-induced liver injury in rats and mice

Amodiaquine (AQ) is associated with a relatively high incidence of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (IDILI) and agranulocytosis. A previous study reported that a combination of high dose AQ and glutathione (GSH) depletion led to liver injury. However, the characteristics of this toxicity were very different from AQ-induced liver injury in humans. We developed a model of AQ-induced liver injury with characteristics similar to the injury in humans by treating mice with lower doses of AQ for several weeks. In this study we found that not only did GSH depletion not increase AQ covalent binding to hepatic proteins at this lower dose, but also it paradoxically prevented the liver injury. We extended the model to rats and found AQ treatment led to a mild delayed onset liver injury that resolved despite continued treatment with AQ. Immunohistochemistry indicated the presence of Kupffer cell activation, apoptosis and hepatocyte proliferation in the liver. There was also an increase in serum IL-2, IL-5, IL-9, IL-12, MCP-1 and TGFβ, but a decrease in leptin. Coincident with the elevated serum ALT, the number of liver CD4(+) T-cells, IL-17 secreting cells and TH17/Treg cells increased at Week 3 and decreased during continued treatment. Increases in NK1.1+ cells and activated M2 macrophages were also observed during liver injury. These results suggest that the outcome of the liver injury was determined by the balance between effector and regulatory cells. Co-treatment with cyclosporin prevented AQ-induced liver injury, which supports an immune mechanism. Retinoic acid (RA), which has been reported to enhance natural killer (NK) cell activity, exacerbated AQ-induced liver injury. These results suggest that AQ-induced IDILI is immune mediated and the subsequent adaptation appears to represent immune tolerance.

Protein Targets of Isoniazid-Reactive Metabolites in Mouse Liver in Vivo

Isoniazid (INH) has been a first-line drug for the treatment of tuberculosis for more than 40 years. INH is well-tolerated by most patients, but some patients develop hepatitis that can be severe in rare cases or after overdose. The mechanisms underlying the hepatotoxicity of INH are not known, but covalent binding of reactive metabolites is known to occur in animals and is suspected in human cases. A major unresolved question is the identity of the liver proteins that are modified by INH metabolites. Treating mice with INH leads to accumulation of isonicotinoyl-lysine residues on numerous proteins in the hepatic S9 fraction. Analysis of this fraction by SDS-PAGE followed by tryptic digestion of bands and LC-MS/MS revealed a single adducted peptide derived from d-dopachrome decarboxylase. When a tryptic digest of whole S9 was applied to anti-INH antibody immobilized on beads, only 12 peptides were retained, 5 of which clearly contained isonicotinoyl-lysine adducts and could be confidently assigned to 5 liver proteins. In another experiment, undigested S9 fractions from INA-treated and untreated (UT) mice were adsorbed in parallel on anti-INA beads and the retained proteins were digested and analyzed by LC-MS/MS. The INA-S9 digest showed 1 adducted peptide that was associated with a unique protein whose identity was corroborated by numerous nonadducted peptides in the digest and 13 other proteins identified only by multiple nonadducted peptides. None of these 14 proteins was associated with any peptides present in the UT-S9 fraction. Overall, we identified 7 mouse liver proteins that became adducted by INH metabolites in vivo. Of these 7 INH target proteins, only 2 have been previously reported as targets of any reactive metabolite in vivo.

Mechanism of isoniazid-induced hepatotoxicity: then and now

Isoniazid (INH) remains a mainstay for the treatment of tuberculosis despite the fact that it can cause liver failure. Previous mechanistic hypotheses have classified this type of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) as 'metabolic idiosyncrasy' which was thought not to involve an immune response and was mainly due to the bioactivation of the acetylhydrazine metabolite. However, more recent studies support an alternative hypothesis, specifically, that INH itself is directly bioactivated to a reactive metabolite, which in some patients leads to an immune response and liver injury. Furthermore, there appear to be two phenotypes of INH-induced liver injury. Most cases involve mild liver injury, which resolves with immune tolerance, while other cases appear to have a more severe phenotype that is associated with the production of anti-drug/anti-CYP P450 antibodies and can progress to liver failure.

The Combination of Anti-CTLA-4 and PD1-/- Mice Unmasks the Potential of Isoniazid and Nevirapine To Cause Liver Injury

Our laboratory recently reported what we believe is the first valid animal model of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (IDILI) by treating PD1-/- mice with an anti-CTLA-4 antibody and amodiaquine (AQ). PD1 and CTLA-4 are important immune checkpoint receptors that are involved in inducing immune tolerance. This model was able to produce significant liver injury that looks very similar to the liver injury seen in humans. Although this model was shown to work with AQ, the question becomes whether blocking immune tolerance would unmask the potential of other drugs to cause IDILI. In this study, we tested isoniazid and nevirapine, both drugs with significant histories of causing IDILI in humans even though they do not cause significant injury in animals with doses that result in therapeutic blood levels. Both drugs in combination with these immune checkpoint inhibitors caused mild but significant delayed onset liver injury, which is similar to the mild injury that they can cause in humans. INH-induced liver injury in this model was associated with an increase in NK cells, while NVP-induced liver injury was associated with a greater increase in CD8 T cells. Although the liver injury caused by these drugs in this model was mild, these results suggest that impairing immune tolerance may be a general method for unmasking the potential of drugs to cause IDILI and therefore provide a screening tool for drug development.

The Role of CD8 T Cells in Amodiaquine-Induced Liver Injury in PD1-/- Mice Cotreated with Anti-CTLA-4

The mechanism of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (IDILI) remains poorly understood, in part due to the lack of a valid animal model. Clinical evidence suggests that most IDILI is immune mediated, and the major factor preventing liver injury in most patients is immune tolerance. Many attempts have been made in the past to develop an animal model of IDILI, but none had characteristics similar to those of IDILI in humans, and presumably they involved a different mechanism. Recently our laboratory reported a model of amodiaquine (AQ)-induced IDILI using PD1-/- mice and an anti-CTLA4 antibody. This may be the first valid animal model of IDILI because it mimics the characteristics of IDILI in humans. The current study extended the duration of AQ treatment to see if this model would lead to liver failure and to further characterize the associated immune response. Although AQ treatment was extended to 10 weeks and total bilirubin levels were significantly elevated compared to control, there was no further increase from weeks 7 to 10, and the animals did not develop overt liver failure. Mice treated with AQ and anti-CTLA4 had a significant increase in percentage of hepatic CD4, CD8, Th17, and Treg cells after 10 weeks of AQ treatment, as well as significantly decreased NK cells. CD8 T cells have been implicated in several serious idiosyncratic drug reactions, and we used an anti-CD8 antibody to deplete CD8 T cells to study their involvement in this liver injury. We found that depletion of CD8 T cells protected mice from AQ-induced liver injury in this model, which strongly suggests that they are responsible for the liver damage. This is consistent with the finding of CD8 T cells in liver biopsies of human IDILI and may lead the way to an effective treatment for serious IDILI.

Treatment of PD-1(-/-) mice with amodiaquine and anti-CTLA4 leads to liver injury similar to idiosyncratic liver injury in patients

The mechanism of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (IDILI) remains poorly understood, to a large degree because of the lack of a valid animal model. Recently, we reported an animal model in which treatment of female C57BL/6 mice with amodiaquine (AQ) resulted in mild liver injury with a delayed onset and resolution despite continued treatment. Such adaptation is a common outcome in the IDILI caused by drugs that can cause liver failure. We had hypothesized that most IDILI is immune-mediated and adaptation represents immune tolerance. In this study we found that AQ treatment of Cbl-b(-/-) and PD-1(-/-) mice, which have impaired immune tolerance, resulted in a slightly greater injury. Cotreatment of C57BL/6 with AQ and anti-CTLA4 also resulted in a greater increase in ALT than treatment with AQ alone; however, these mice also had an increase in T regulatory (Treg) cells and T helper cells expressing PD-1 and CTLA4. The increase in these cells implies the induction of immune tolerance, and the alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activity in these mice returned to normal despite continued treatment. Cotreatment of PD-1(-/-) mice with anti-CTLA4 antibody and AQ resulted in the greatest increase in ALT (200-300 U/L), and necroinflammatory responses characterized by portal infiltration of lymphocytes with interface hepatitis. The lymphocyte infiltration included T and B cells, and the CD8(+) T cells produced perforin and granzyme. In addition, the ALT activity in PD-1(-/-) mice cotreated with anti-CTLA4 antibody and AQ did not return to normal, as it had in other mice.

CONCLUSION

We report here the first animal model of IDILI that is similar to the IDILI that occurs in humans, and it was accomplished by inhibiting immune tolerance.