1
|
Ter Haar ELM, van den Reek JMPA, Ten Bruin EE, Bronkhorst EM, Borgonjen RJ, Kleinpenning MM, Kop EN, Visch MB, van de Kerkhof PCM, de Jong EMGJ, Lubeek SFK. Exclusion by age, cardiovascular comorbidity and malignancies are the main factors that impact generalizability of evidence from trials to the real-world situation in older adults with psoriasis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2023; 37:e1471-e1474. [PMID: 37471529 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.19368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- E L M Ter Haar
- Department of Dermatology, Radboud University Medical Centre (Radboudumc), Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - J M P A van den Reek
- Department of Dermatology, Radboud University Medical Centre (Radboudumc), Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - E E Ten Bruin
- Department of Dermatology, Radboud University Medical Centre (Radboudumc), Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - E M Bronkhorst
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - R J Borgonjen
- Department of Dermatology, Gelderse Vallei Hospital and Padberg Clinic, Ede, The Netherlands
| | - M M Kleinpenning
- Department of Dermatology, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - E N Kop
- Department of Dermatology, Bernhoven Hospital, Uden, The Netherlands
| | - M B Visch
- Department of Dermatology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - P C M van de Kerkhof
- Department of Dermatology, Radboud University Medical Centre (Radboudumc), Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - E M G J de Jong
- Department of Dermatology, Radboud University Medical Centre (Radboudumc), Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - S F K Lubeek
- Department of Dermatology, Radboud University Medical Centre (Radboudumc), Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ter Haar ELM, Van den Reek JMPA, Gaarn Du Jardin K, Barbero-Castillo A, De Jong EMGJ, Lubeek SFK. Efficacy and Safety of Tildrakizumab in Older Patients: Pooled Analyses of Two Randomized Phase III Clinical Trials (reSURFACE 1 and reSURFACE 2) Through 244 Weeks. Acta Derm Venereol 2023; 103:adv17752. [PMID: 37877618 PMCID: PMC10614651 DOI: 10.2340/actadv.v103.17752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/26/2023] Open
Abstract
The evidence on treating older patients with psoriasis with modern biologics is scarce. This study compared the efficacy and safety of tildrakizumab among younger and older patients with psoriasis (< 65/≥ 65 years) in a post hoc analysis of 2 phase III trials (reSURFACE1/2, n = 1,862). Tildrakizumab 100 mg/200 mg was administered at weeks 0/4/every 12 weeks thereafter. At week 28, patients with ≥ 75% improvement in baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI75) in reSURFACE1 were re-randomized to the same tildrakizumab dose or placebo; in reSURFACE2, PASI75 responders to 200 mg were re-randomized to tildrakizumab 100 mg or 200 mg; PASI75 responders to 100 mg maintained their dose. At weeks 64/52 (reSURFACE1/2), PASI50 responders entered an extension period (weeks 256/244). Outcomes were proportion of patients with PASI < 3, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) 0/1, comorbidities, comedication, and side-effects. The proportion of patients with a PASI < 3 was similar and maintained (tildrakizumab 100 mg and 200 mg, week 244: 83.3% and 84.1%/92.3% and 100.0%); DLQI 0/1 proportions at week 52 were 66.8% and 72.0%/68.3% and 81.3%. Comorbidity and comedication were more common in older patients. The safety profile of tildrakizumab appeared favourable in both groups. Tildrakizumab in patients ≥ 65 years appears effective and safe in long-term psoriasis management. These findings might assist treatment selection and overcome treatment reluctance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elke L M Ter Haar
- Department of Dermatology, Radboud University Medical Centre (Radboudumc), Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Juul M P A Van den Reek
- Department of Dermatology, Radboud University Medical Centre (Radboudumc), Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Elke M G J De Jong
- Department of Dermatology, Radboud University Medical Centre (Radboudumc), Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Satish F K Lubeek
- Department of Dermatology, Radboud University Medical Centre (Radboudumc), Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Perry WM, Vora P, Oh G, Park C, Chang ALS. Incorporating the "4Ms" framework to improve outpatient geriatric dermatology care. J Am Geriatr Soc 2023; 71:665-668. [PMID: 36205447 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.18060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Revised: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Warren M Perry
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Geriatric Emergency Department Medical Director, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Paayal Vora
- Northeast Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, Ohio, USA
| | - Gabriel Oh
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Caroline Park
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Primary Care and Population Health, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Anne Lynn S Chang
- Department of Dermatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Redwood City, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rodriguez-Gutierrez R, Flores-Rodríguez A, Raygoza-Cortez K, Garcia-Leal M, Mariño-Velasco S, Plata-Huerta HH, Sáenz-Flores M, Ramirez-Garcia LA, Rojo-Garza A, Maraka S, Singh-Ospina NV, Brito JP, Gonzalez-Gonzalez JG. Intensive vs. conventional blood pressure goals in older patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endocrine 2022; 78:13-23. [PMID: 35962895 DOI: 10.1007/s12020-022-03159-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Assess the effect of intensive vs conventional blood pressure goals on patient-important outcomes in older adults with type 2 diabetes. METHODS A comprehensive search was performed using electronic databases. Randomized controlled trials comparing intensive vs conventional blood pressure goals in adults over 60 years of age with type 2 diabetes were included. Events were evaluated using a modified Mantel-Haenszel meta-analysis with Peto's method. Study selection and data extraction were performed independently and in duplicate. RESULTS Seven trials were included. A 19% risk reduction (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.69-0.95; I2 = 8%; p = 0.35) in the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and 37% risk reduction (OR 0.63; 95% CI 0.51-0.79; I2 = 0%; p = 0.56) in the occurrence of fatal or non-fatal stroke was documented in the intensive treatment group. There were no differences in the occurrence of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and peripheral vascular disease. Data regarding treatment adverse effects and microvascular outcomes was scarce. CONCLUSIONS Intensive blood pressure goals in older patients with diabetes were associated with a lower risk of stroke and MACE, but not with all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and peripheral vascular disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rene Rodriguez-Gutierrez
- Plataforma INVEST Medicina UANL-KER Unit Mayo Clinic (KER Unit Mexico), Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, 64460, México
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit-Endocrinology (KER-Endo), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
- Endocrinology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital "Dr. José E. González", Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Monterrey, 64460, México
| | - Andrea Flores-Rodríguez
- Plataforma INVEST Medicina UANL-KER Unit Mayo Clinic (KER Unit Mexico), Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, 64460, México
| | - Karina Raygoza-Cortez
- Plataforma INVEST Medicina UANL-KER Unit Mayo Clinic (KER Unit Mexico), Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, 64460, México
| | - Mariana Garcia-Leal
- Plataforma INVEST Medicina UANL-KER Unit Mayo Clinic (KER Unit Mexico), Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, 64460, México
| | - Sofía Mariño-Velasco
- Plataforma INVEST Medicina UANL-KER Unit Mayo Clinic (KER Unit Mexico), Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, 64460, México
| | - Hiram H Plata-Huerta
- Plataforma INVEST Medicina UANL-KER Unit Mayo Clinic (KER Unit Mexico), Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, 64460, México
| | - Melissa Sáenz-Flores
- Plataforma INVEST Medicina UANL-KER Unit Mayo Clinic (KER Unit Mexico), Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, 64460, México
| | - Luz A Ramirez-Garcia
- Plataforma INVEST Medicina UANL-KER Unit Mayo Clinic (KER Unit Mexico), Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, 64460, México
| | - Amanda Rojo-Garza
- Plataforma INVEST Medicina UANL-KER Unit Mayo Clinic (KER Unit Mexico), Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, 64460, México
| | - Spyridoula Maraka
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit-Endocrinology (KER-Endo), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
- Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, Medicine Service, Little Rock, AR, USA
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Naikky V Singh-Ospina
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit-Endocrinology (KER-Endo), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Juan P Brito
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit-Endocrinology (KER-Endo), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism, Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jose G Gonzalez-Gonzalez
- Plataforma INVEST Medicina UANL-KER Unit Mayo Clinic (KER Unit Mexico), Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, 64460, México.
- Endocrinology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital "Dr. José E. González", Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Monterrey, 64460, México.
- Research Unit, University Hospital "Dr. José E. González", Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, 64460, México.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Drug Survival, Safety, and Effectiveness of Biologics in Older Patients with Psoriasis: A Comparison with Younger Patients-A BioCAPTURE Registry Study. Drugs Aging 2022; 39:715-727. [PMID: 35859228 PMCID: PMC9300332 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-022-00961-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Psoriasis is a common inflammatory disease in any age group, but also in older patients (≥ 65 years of age). Since older patients are often excluded from clinical trials, limited data specifically on this growing population are available, e.g. regarding the safety and performance of biological treatment. AIMS We aimed to give insight into this specific population by comparing the drug survival and safety of biologics in older patients with that in younger patients. METHODS In this real-world observational study, data from 3 academic and 15 non-academic centers in The Netherlands were extracted from the prospective BioCAPTURE registry. Biologics included in this study were tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-17, IL-12/23, and IL-23 inhibitors. Patients were divided into two age groups: ≥ 65 years and < 65 years. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was used to measure comorbid disease status, and all adverse events (AEs) that led to treatment discontinuation were classified according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) classification. All AEs that led to treatment discontinuation were studied to check whether they could be classified as serious AEs (SAEs). Kaplan-Meier survival curves for overall 5-year drug survival and split according to reasons of discontinuation (ineffectiveness or AEs) were constructed. Cox regression models were used to correct for possible confounders and to investigate associations with drug survival in both age groups separately. Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) scores during the first 2 years of treatment and at the time of treatment discontinuation were assessed and compared between age groups. RESULTS A total of 890 patients were included, of whom 102 (11.4%) were aged ≥ 65 years. Body mass index, sex, and distribution of biologic classes (e.g. TNFα, IL12/23) were not significantly different between the two age groups. A significantly higher CCI score was found in older patients, indicative of more comorbidity (p < 0.001). The 5-year ineffectiveness-related drug survival was lower for older patients (44.5% vs. 60.5%; p = 0.006), and the 5-year overall (≥ 65 years: 32.4% vs. < 65 years: 42.1%; p = 0.144) and AE-related (≥ 65 years: 82.1% vs. < 65 years: 79.5%; p = 0.913) drug survival was comparable between age groups. Of all AEs (n = 155) that led to discontinuation, 16 (10.3%) were reported as SAEs but these only occurred in younger patients. After correcting for confounders, the same trends were observed in the drug survival outcomes. Linear regression analyses on PASI scores showed no statistical differences at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months of treatment between age groups. CONCLUSIONS This study in a substantial, well-defined, prospective cohort provides further support that the use of biologics in older patients seems well-tolerated and effective. Biologic discontinuation due to AEs did not occur more frequently in older patients. Older patients discontinued biologic treatment more often due to ineffectiveness, although no clear difference in PASI scores was observed. More real-world studies on physician- and patient-related factors in older patients are warranted.
Collapse
|
6
|
Ter Haar ELM, Tummers M, Bronkhorst EM, van de Kerkhof PCM, de Jong EMGJ, Lubeek SFK. Age-based treatment differences in and reluctance to treating older adults with systemic antipsoriatic therapy - a mixed-method pilot study. J DERMATOL TREAT 2022; 33:2983-2990. [PMID: 35762362 DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2022.2089330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence-based guidance in older adults (≥65 years) with psoriasis is sparse and undertreatment might be present. OBJECTIVES To assess prescribing patterns, comfort levels, barriers and needs of dermatologists when treating older adults with systemic antipsoriatic therapy. METHODS A mixed-methods design was used including a survey among all Dutch dermatologists and residents, followed by semi-structured interviews. RESULTS Most of the survey respondents applied systemic treatment to the same extent in older versus younger patients (n = 49; 67.1%) and weren't reluctant prescribing systemic therapy (n = 50; 68.5%) in older adults. However, 26% (n = 19) of the respondents treated older adults less often with systemic therapy compared to younger patients and 68.1% (n = 49) performed additional actions in older adults, e.g. intensified monitoring or dose reduction. Based on the survey and interviews (n = 10), the main reasons for these age-based treatment differences were comorbidity, comedication, and fear of adverse events. More evidence-based guidance, education, and time to assess older adults were identified as most important needs, especially regarding frailty screening. CONCLUSIONS Age-based treatment differences in and reluctance to treating older adults with systemic antipsoriatic therapy were common. There is a need for more evidence-based guidance, education, and consultation time, to improve treatment in this growing population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elke L M Ter Haar
- Department of Dermatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marcia Tummers
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Ewald M Bronkhorst
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Elke M G J de Jong
- Department of Dermatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Satish F K Lubeek
- Department of Dermatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tang E, Maqbool T, Lam M, Adam GP, Tadrous M, Rochon PA, Drucker AM. Safety of Systemic Medications Among Older Adults With Psoriasis and Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies. J Cutan Med Surg 2021; 25:397-408. [PMID: 33566683 DOI: 10.1177/1203475421993770] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Psoriasis and atopic dermatitis are common among older adults (≥65 years old), but clinical trials often exclude that population. OBJECTIVE To synthesize evidence from observational studies on the safety of systemic therapies (conventional or biologic) for psoriasis and atopic dermatitis among older adults in a systematic review. METHODS We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE (inception to October 31, 2019) and included observational studies reporting adverse events among older people treated with systemic therapy for psoriasis or atopic dermatitis. Outcomes were death, hospitalization, emergency department visits, infections, major cardiovascular events, renal toxicity, hepatotoxicity, and cytopenias. We assessed study quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS We included 22 studies on treatment for psoriasis and 2 for atopic dermatitis. Most studies were small and non-comparative and 20 of 24 were low quality. Studies comparing safety between medications or medication classes or between older and younger adults did not show apparent differences but had wide confidence intervals around relative effect estimates. Heterogeneity of study design and reporting precluded quantitative synthesis. CONCLUSIONS There is scant evidence on the safety of conventional systemic and biologic medications for older adults with psoriasis or atopic dermatitis; older adults and their clinicians should be aware of this evidence gap.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan Tang
- 793812366 Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Talha Maqbool
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Megan Lam
- 12362 Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Gaelen P Adam
- 174610 Center for Evidence Synthesis in Health, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, USA
| | - Mina Tadrous
- 70378 Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Canada.,7985 Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Canada
| | - Paula A Rochon
- 7985 Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Canada
| | - Aaron M Drucker
- 7985 Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Canada.,Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Butler DC. Dermatology's Management of Flagship Diseases in Older Adults: Lifting the Blindfold. JAMA Dermatol 2020; 156:1175-1176. [PMID: 32822493 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.2310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel C Butler
- Department of Dermatology, University of California, San Francisco
| |
Collapse
|