Comparison of cumulative clinical benefits of biologics for the treatment of psoriasis over 16 weeks: Results from a network meta-analysis

Transcriptomic Analysis Identifies Disease Severity and Therapeutic Response in Psoriasis

Abnormalities in gene expression profiles characterize patients with inflammatory skin diseases, including psoriasis, and changes may reflect the action of specific therapeutic agents. To examine this, gene expression analysis of psoriatic skin was assessed by Gene Set Variation Analysis using informative gene modules, and longitudinal data were analyzed to assess the impact of various treatments. Ridge penalized logistic regression was employed to derive a transcriptomic score. Psoriatic lesional skin exhibited perturbations in gene expression profiles at baseline, with enrichment of signatures for neutrophils, keratinocytes, IFN, IL-12 complex, IL-1 cytokines, TNF, and T helper 17. Treatment with a variety of agents reduced lesional gene expression abnormalities to those in nonlesional skin. Specific gene expression abnormalities at baseline identified clinical responders to each treatment. Changes in gene expression over time were less pronounced in nonlesional skin and lesional skin in clinical nonresponders. The combined transcriptomic scores showed significant positive correlations with PASI scores in clinical responders over time. Overall, gene expression abnormalities characterize the severity of psoriatic skin lesions, can be used to predict responsiveness to individual treatments, and revert toward those of nonlesional skin with effective therapy. Therefore, gene expression analysis can be useful to support management of patients with psoriasis.

Immunological profile of lactate metabolism-related genes in Psoriasis a comprehensive analysis based on bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing data

Psoriasis (Pso) is a chronic erythema squamous disease often accompanied by metabolic abnormalities. Disturbances in lactate metabolism have been observed in the skin of patients with Pso, but the role of lactate metabolism in the pathogenesis of Pso remains unclear. To identify core genes associated with lactate metabolism in Pso, we downloaded and merged two Pso-related datasets (GSE13355, GSE109248) from the GEO database. Through comprehensive analysis, we analyzed the functions associated with these hub genes and the correlation between their expression levels and immune infiltration. Additionally, we explored lactate metabolism-related hub genes in different immune cells using single-cell sequencing data. We identified four lactate metabolism-related hub genes that are highly associated with Pso. Further analysis revealed that these four hub genes were significantly correlated with the levels of immune cell infiltration. To further elucidate the impact of lactate metabolism on immune cells, we analyzed single-cell sequencing data from healthy controls and Pso patients. The expression of lactate metabolism-related hub genes was primarily observed in moDCs and T cells. These results suggest that lactate metabolism-related genes and their functions are closely associated with changes in inflammatory cells in Pso patients. This study provides new insights into the role of lactate metabolism in the pathogenesis of Pso and highlights potential therapeutic targets for the disease.

Efficacy of Ixekizumab in Chinese Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis and Special Body Area Involvement: Sub-analysis of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Phase 3 Study

INTRODUCTION

Special body area involvement is common in psoriasis and can be challenging to treat. We investigated the efficacy of ixekizumab (IXE) in Chinese patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis and fingernail, scalp, or palmoplantar involvement.

METHODS

A post-hoc sub-analysis of a phase 3 trial, in which patients were randomized to receive placebo, IXE 80 mg every 2 (IXE Q2W) or 4 (IXE Q4W) weeks. At Week 12, patients classified as IXE responders [static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) score of 0 or 1 [0,1)] were re-randomized (2:1) to IXE Q4W or placebo until Week 60. Efficacy was assessed by body-region specific parameters including Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI), Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index (PSSI), and Palmoplantar Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PPASI).

RESULTS

Of 438 patients, 99.1% (434) had ≥ 1 special area involvement [fingernail (76.5%, 335), scalp (97.3%, 426), palmoplantar (27.9%, 122)]. Significantly greater improvements from baseline in NAPSI score were observed with IXE Q4W and Q2W at Week 12 versus placebo (p < 0.001 for both). These improvements were further increased and sustained over 60 weeks in IXE Q4W and Q2W responders who were re-randomized to IXE Q4W, who achieved a 77.9% and 89.7% improvement from baseline, respectively, at Week 60. Significantly higher proportions of patients receiving IXE Q4W and Q2W achieved NAPSI 50 at Week 12 versus placebo (44.4%, 36.6% vs. 14.1%; p < 0.001 and < 0.01, respectively). Similarly, significantly higher proportions of patients receiving IXE Q4W and Q2W achieved PSSI 100 and PPASI 100 at Week 12 versus placebo (60.6% and 65.1% vs. 1.2%, and 67.4%, 84.3% vs. 21.4%, respectively; p < 0.001 for all comparisons). Improvements across all outcomes were sustained in patients re-randomized to IXE Q4W until Week 60.

CONCLUSION

IXE led to a rapid onset of action and sustained efficacy over 60 weeks in Chinese patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis and special body area involvement.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov identifier, NCT03364309.

Cost per response analysis of deucravacitinib versus apremilast and first-line biologics among patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in the United States

BACKGROUND

Understanding the economic value of deucravacitinib and apremilast could assist treatment decision-making for patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

OBJECTIVE

This study compared the cost per response (CPR) for US patients initiating deucravacitinib versus apremilast for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

METHODS

A CPR model using pharmacy and administration costs was developed from a US payer perspective. Response was defined as a 75% reduction from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75) at weeks 16 and 24. Long-term response was defined as the cumulative benefit over 52 weeks, measured as area under the curve; subsequent treatment was included. Scenario analyses explored varying the efficacy measure or choices of subsequent treatments and limiting discontinuation.

RESULTS

The CPR for deucravacitinib versus apremilast was lower at 16 weeks (difference: -$3796 [95% confidence interval (CI): -$6140 to -$1659]) and 24 weeks (difference: -$12,784 [95% CI: -$16,674 to -$9369]). At 52 weeks, the cost per cumulative benefit was lower for patients who initiated deucravacitinib, regardless of initial treatment period duration (16 or 24 weeks).

CONCLUSIONS

Scenario analyses found mainly consistent results. This study showed that the CPR is lower when initiating deucravacitinib versus apremilast in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

Management of moderate to severe psoriasis with brodalumab-Real-world evidence from the LIBERO study

BACKGROUND

Brodalumab, a fully human monoclonal immunoglobulin IgG2 antibody that binds the human interleukin 17 receptor subunit A, is available for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in Europe since September 2017, but so far there are only a few studies on its use in real-world conditions.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the management of moderate-to-severe psoriasis with brodalumab 210 mg in daily practice after 12 and 52 weeks (W). In addition, patient profiles and treatment pathways are described.

METHODS

LIBERO is a prospective, multicenter, non-interventional study including adult patients with plaque psoriasis treated with brodalumab 210 mg.

RESULTS

In total, 638 patients (65% male, mean age: 49.3 ± 14.4 years) from 148 sites in Germany were enrolled. The majority suffered from severe (51.1%) or very severe (13.1%) psoriasis according to physician global assessment (PGA0-5). When starting with brodalumab, 58.5% were biologic naïve and 41.5% were previously treated with another biologic, mainly adalimumab (18.5%) and secukinumab (17.9%). About 74.0% of patients met the primary endpoint of an absolute PASI ≤3 at ~W12 (n = 618, LOCF). The mean PASI was reduced significantly as of ~W2 from 17.2 (±11.7) to 9.7 (±8.8) and improved further to 3.3 (±6.3) at ~W12 (p < 0.001). At ~W52 85.5% of patients reached a PGA0/1-response (primary endpoint) and 54.1% patients were assessed as completely clear (PGA0) (both n = 399, as observed). Effectiveness of brodalumab was confirmed in relevant subgroup analysis by previous treatment regimen. Most frequently reported adverse events were nasopharyngitis (4.6%), psoriasis (4.6%) and arthralgia (4.1%), new safety signals were not detected.

CONCLUSIONS

This representative, non-interventional study confirms the short- and long-term effectiveness and safety profile of brodalumab in the management of psoriasis in daily practice as well as in relevant treatment pathways.

Anti-interleukin-17 therapies for moderate/severe psoriasis in clinical practice: effectiveness, safety and association with clinical patient factors

OBJECTIVES

Interleukin-17 (IL-17) contributes to the pathogenesis of psoriasis. Secukinumab, ixekizumab, and brodalumab are monoclonal antibodies anti-IL-17 antibodies, approved for the treatment of moderate/severe plaque psoriasis.The aim of the study was to describe the effectiveness and safety of anti-IL-17 agents in moderate/severe plaque psoriasis in clinical practice. We also analysed anti-IL-17 therapies' survival, dose adjustment, and clinical patients' factors associated with their effectiveness and safety.

METHODS

A retrospective, longitudinal study was conducted at a tertiary hospital. We included patients with moderate/severe psoriasis treated with anti-IL-17 agents. The effectiveness was evaluated with Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score and safety through the adverse drug reactions (ADRs) collected.

RESULTS

38 patients were studied (median age=47.4 years, 71.0% male). The mean number of biological therapies that patients received was 2.6, and anti-IL-17 therapy was the first biological therapy for 36.8% of patients. The median years in treatment were 2.5 (95% CI 1.95 to 2.98) for secukinumab, 1.2 (95% CI 0.36 to 1.47) for ixekizumab, and 0.7 (IQR 0.71) for brodalumab. The median PASI score after 6 months of treatment was 0 (IQR 0) and 85.3% of patients achieved a PASI of 90 (84.0% with secukinumab, 87.5% with ixekizumab, and 100% with brodalumab). Dose adjustment was associated with the line of treatment (p=0.034 for naïve patients), age (p=0.044 for younger patients), and concomitant pathologies (p=0.015 without more diseases).24 patients suffered from ADRs, mainly infections of the upper respiratory tract, and there were no statistically significant differences between the three therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-IL-17 agents constitute an effective treatment for patients with moderate/severe plaque psoriasis and for longer. Dose reductions were associated with fewer lines of treatment, younger patients and absence of concomitant pathologies. ADR were minor and similar among the anti-IL-17.

Plasma Cytokines for the Prediction of the Effectiveness of TNFα Inhibitors Etanercept, Infliximab, and Adalimumab in the Treatment of Psoriasis

Background/Objectives: Psoriasis is a chronic, inflammatory, immuno-mediated cutaneous disease characterized by a prominent TNFα-IL23/IL17 immune axis. In recent years, targeted therapies have become standard practice for managing moderate-to-severe psoriasis and have demonstrated efficacy. At the same time, identifying factors associated with the success or failure of TNFα inhibitor therapy remains one of the most difficult aspects in psoriasis treatment. Methods: A clinical, non-randomized study was conducted to evaluate the impact of TNFα inhibitors on the plasma cytokine profiles in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis vulgaris (ICD-10 code L40.0). The patients were treated with either etanercept, adalimumab, or infliximab for 16 weeks. Plasma cytokine profiles were assessed using a BioPlex200 System. Results: By the 16th week of therapy, a positive treatment response (PASI ≥ 75) was observed in 51 patients (63%), while 30 patients (37%) showed no response (PASI ≤ 50). When using etanercept, a positive effect was observed in 11 patients (41%), in 14 patients (52%) using adalimumab, and in 26 patients (96%) using infliximab. Analysis of the baseline cytokine levels revealed no differences between the "positive effect" and "no effect" groups, except for IL20, which was 2.61 times higher in the "positive effect" group compared to the "no effect" group, suggesting its potential predictive role in the effectiveness of therapy with TNFα inhibitors. Treatment led to a decrease in IL17F, IL31, sCD40L, and VEGF for all patients, and in IL20 for the "positive effect" group. The increase in ICAM1 in the "no effect" group suggests the possible retention of active migration and the fixation of T cells in the affected skin in these patients. No significant difference in cytokine levels was observed when categorizing patients into subgroups based on the effectiveness of therapy with etanercept, infliximab, and adalimumab; only a pre- and post-treatment difference in the whole cohort was noted. A random forest model showed the importance of VEGF, sCD40L, and ICAM1. Conclusions: The baseline levels of VEGF, sCD40L, and ICAM1, as well as IL20, could serve as potential predictors of treatment effectiveness using TNFa inhibitors. However, this hypothesis requires confirmation with a larger patient population.

Cumulative Benefit Over 52 Weeks With Deucravacitinib Versus Apremilast in Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis: POETYK PSO-1 Post Hoc Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Deucravacitinib demonstrated superior efficacy to apremilast in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in the POETYK PSO-1 and PSO-2 clinical trials. In the study reported here, we aimed to determine the overall 52-week cumulative clinical benefit of treatment initiated with deucravacitinib versus apremilast and to compare the 52-week cumulative benefit of initiating and staying on deucravacitinib versus initiating apremilast and continuing or switching to deucravacitinib at week 24 of treatment.

METHODS

This post hoc analysis of POETYK PSO-1 data (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03624127) determined the cumulative clinical benefit of deucravacitinib 6 mg once daily and apremilast 30 mg twice daily in adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Patients treated with apremilast who did not achieve a 50% reduction in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 50) at week 24 were switched to deucravacitinib. The cumulative clinical benefit of deucravacitinib versus apremilast over 52 weeks was based on cumulative measures of ≥ 75% improvement from baseline in PASI score (PASI 75) and the proportion of patients with a static Physician Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 (sPGA 0/1). Ratios of area under the curve estimates between treatments were calculated and compared based on analysis of covariance regression models.

RESULTS

Patients initiating deucravacitinib (N = 332) had a greater cumulative benefit as measured by the PASI 75 and sPGA 0/1 than those initiating apremilast (N = 168). Over 52 weeks, those initiating deucravacitinib experienced 50% more benefit as measured by PASI 75 and 58% more benefit as measured by sPGA 0/1 than those initiating apremilast. Results were consistent with the primary analysis when patients were classified by prior systemic and prior biologic therapy exposure.

CONCLUSION

Results from this analysis corroborate the primary efficacy analysis supporting the use of deucravacitinib compared with apremilast for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, regardless of prior systemic or biologic use.

The Best Psoriasis Medications Emerge

Clinical Question

What are the most effective systemic medications to treat plaque psoriasis?

Bottom Line

The most effective drugs for psoriasis were infliximab, bimekizumab, ixekizumab, and risankizumab, and the clinical effectiveness was similar when these 4 drugs were compared against one another. No statistically significant differences in serious adverse events were identified in any of the drugs compared with placebo. The main limitations of this meta-analysis include the lack of assessment of clinical effectiveness beyond 52 weeks and the lack of safety assessments for nonserious adverse events.

Eczematized psoriasis - a frequent but often neglected variant of plaque psoriasis

Psoriasis is a common chronic inflammatory skin disease that causes systemic inflammation and severely impacts the patient's quality of life. Several highly effective therapeutics for psoriasis have been approved in recent years. However, in real life, a high proportion of patients either do not experience the clinical improvement observed in clinical trials or develop a secondary loss of efficacy. This may be a result of unrecognized endotypes of psoriasis that need to be characterized in greater depth to enable selection of an appropriate therapy. Eczematized psoriasis, which occurs in approximately 5-10% of patients with psoriasis, is an often-neglected variant of psoriasis. The term "eczematized psoriasis" refers to patients developing psoriasis with similarities to eczema. These patients typically present with severe itching, and skin biopsies often reveal eosinophil granulocytes, serum crusts, or spongiosis, which are frequently observed in eczema. From an immunological perspective, additional signaling pathways that are responsible for eczema reactions might be activated in eczematized psoriasis compared to classical plaque psoriasis. This review summarizes the key clinical, histological, and immunological features of eczematized psoriasis, proposes diagnostic criteria, and evaluates the therapeutic options for eczematized psoriasis.

Methods used for indirect comparisons of systemic treatments for psoriasis. A systematic review

Background

Indirect comparisons (including network meta-analyses [NMAs]) allow us to compare benefits and risks of multiple interventions for the same clinical condition when head-to-head comparisons are not feasible.

Objective

To provide guidance to the clinical community on better understanding indirect comparison methods to help them to interpret their results by applying two quality standards to published indirect comparisons of systemic biologics for moderate to severe psoriasis.

Methods

A systematic literature review (SLR) of published indirect comparisons of biologics for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis in adults was conducted. Data extraction was performed using a predefined subset of NICE TSD7 (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Technical Support Document 7) checklist questions and methods used to perform each analysis were descriptively compared. Methodological quality of the SLR underlying each indirect comparison was assessed using AMSTAR 2 (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews version 2).

Results

Twenty-two NMAs and four adjusted indirect comparisons (AICs) were identified. Although there were some similarities, for example, application of Bayesian random-effects models, several important methodological aspects varied considerably across NMAs identified, for example, classes of drugs, number of treatments and studies included, reporting and handling of different doses, and reporting of both checks for and investigations of inconsistency. Methodological comparisons across AICs were limited by the small number. The quality of most underlying SLRs described, assessed as overall level of confidence in the results, was 'critically low'.

Conclusions

Understanding that there are different methodologies employed to answer differing research questions is key to helping clinicians to interpret the indirect evidence currently available in psoriasis.

Biomarkers of systemic treatment response in people with psoriasis: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Responses to the systemic treatments commonly used to treat psoriasis vary. Biomarkers that accurately predict effectiveness and safety would enable targeted treatment selection, improved patient outcomes and more cost-effective healthcare.

OBJECTIVES

To perform a scoping review to identify and catalogue candidate biomarkers of systemic treatment response in psoriasis for the translational research community.

METHODS

A systematic search of CENTRAL, Embase, LILACS and MEDLINE was performed for relevant articles published between 1990 and December 2021. Eligibility criteria were studies involving patients with psoriasis (any age, n ≥ 50) reporting biomarkers associated with systemic treatment response. The main outcomes were any measure of systemic treatment efficacy or safety. Data were extracted by one reviewer and checked by a second; studies meeting minimal quality criteria (use of methods to control for confounding) were formally assessed for bias. Candidate biomarkers were identified by an expert multistakeholder group using a majority voting consensus exercise and mapped to relevant cellular and molecular pathways.

RESULTS

Of 71 included studies (67 studying effectiveness outcomes and eight safety outcomes; four studied both), most reported genomic or proteomic biomarkers associated with response to biologics (48 studies). Methodological or reporting limitations frequently compromised the interpretation of findings, including inadequate control for key covariates, lack of adjustment for multiple testing, and selective outcome reporting. We identified candidate biomarkers of efficacy to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors [variation in CARD14, CDKAL1, IL1B, IL12B and IL17RA loci, and lipopolysaccharide-induced phosphorylation of nuclear factor (NF)-κB in type 2 dendritic cells] and ustekinumab (HLA-C*06:02 and variation in an IL1B locus). None were supported by sufficient evidence for clinical use without further validation studies. Candidate biomarkers were found to be involved in the immune cellular crosstalk implicated in psoriasis pathogenesis, most notably antigen presentation, T helper (Th)17 cell differentiation, positive regulation of NF-κB, and Th17 cell activation.

CONCLUSIONS

This comprehensive catalogue provides a key resource for researchers and reveals a diverse range of biomarker types and outcomes in the included studies. The candidate biomarkers identified require further evaluation in methodologically robust studies to establish potential clinical utility. Future studies should aim to address the common methodological limitations highlighted in this review to expedite discovery and validation of biomarkers for clinical use. What is already known about this topic? Responses to the systemic treatments commonly used to treat psoriasis vary. Biomarkers that accurately predict effectiveness and safety would enable targeted treatment selection, improved patient outcomes and more cost-effective healthcare. What does this study add? This review provides a comprehensive catalogue of investigated biomarkers of systemic treatment response in psoriasis. A diverse range of biomarker types and outcomes was found in the included studies, serving as a key resource for the translational research community.

The Value of Indirect Comparisons of Systemic Biologics for Psoriasis: Interpretation of Efficacy Findings

INTRODUCTION

It can be challenging for dermatologists to keep abreast of the growing evidence from published indirect comparisons (ICs) of treatments for psoriasis. The objective of this analysis was to summarise comparative clinical efficacy and safety findings from ICs of systemic biologics for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis and to identify factors potentially affecting efficacy outcomes and their possible implications for clinical decision making.

METHODS

An umbrella review of short- and long-term efficacy and safety findings from 26 ICs visually compared 90% improvement in Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI90) treatment rankings and three safety outcome rankings side by side. Pearson's correlation coefficients measured the strength of the association between each pair of ICs on the basis of identified factors that could potentially affect efficacy findings.

RESULTS

Some consistency in short-term PASI90 efficacy rankings was observed for certain drugs, although rankings for most drugs varied by IC. Factors potentially affecting efficacy outcomes included the use of different methodologies for head-to-head comparison and statistical analyses, and variation in drugs and classes included treatment dosing and duration, outcome definitions and effect measures reported between ICs. Considerable variation in these factors was found across all 26 ICs. Comparative safety information of value to physicians was limited.

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial differences were identified between ICs in factors that could potentially affect efficacy outcomes. Treatment rankings must be interpreted alongside actual differences in IC outcomes to allow conclusions on clinical relevance. Drugs within a class cannot be considered of equal efficacy: therapies should be considered individually rather than by class.

Overlapping network meta-analyses on psoriasis systemic treatments, an overview: quantity does not make quality

BACKGROUND

Network meta-analyses (NMAs) have become successful in addressing gaps in the comparative effectiveness of systemic treatments in moderate-to-severe psoriasis. However, their increasing number carries both a risk of overlap and reproducibility issues that can hamper clinical decision-making.

OBJECTIVES

In this overview, we aimed to assess redundancy across these NMAs and to describe their characteristics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We considered all systematic reviews with NMAs of randomized controlled trials that included adult patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis and that evaluated the efficacy and/or safety of systemic treatments compared with placebo or with an active comparator. PubMed/MEDLINE, Epistemonikos, PROSPERO and the Evidence update of the Centre of Evidence-Based Dermatology of the University of Nottingham were searched up to 25 February 2021. Our main outcome was the number per year of redundant NMAs and the extent of their overlap. We also described their features, especially, the confidence in the results of the reviews, the funding of the studies and the presence of spin (a description that overstates efficacy and/or understates harm), reporting issues and methodological characteristics.

RESULTS

In total, 47 redundant NMAs were included. Only two of 47 (4%) included all available treatments. Both efficacy and safety were evaluated in 14 of 47 (30%) NMAs and both short- and long-term evaluations were assessed in five of 47 (11%). Confidence in the results was critically low for 39 of 47 (83%) NMAs and only 10 of 47 (21·3%) registered a protocol. Twenty-six of 47 NMAs (55%) received pharmaceutical funding. Contract research organizations were involved in 19 of 47 (40%) NMAs. Reporting was poor across most of the NMA abstracts and spin was present in all of the abstracts. Almost half of the NMAs failed to consider important limitations such as heterogeneity (considered in 32%) or consistency (considered in 66%).

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to a duplication of efforts, our overview showed heterogeneous methods and poor confidence in the results in a majority of the included NMAs, further distorted by reporting issues and spin. Clinicians need to interpret NMAs with caution when looking for the most reliable and comprehensive evidence.

Geographic Patterns in Psoriasis: An Observational Study of CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry

Background: How psoriasis disease characteristics, management, and outcomes each vary across the US is not fully understood. Objective: Assess regional disease characteristics for patients enrolled in CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry, report biologic initiations by class over the period, and evaluate regional outcome data for initiations with 6-month follow-up. Methods: Participants included new biologic initiations in CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry from 2014-2019 categorized into 7 different geographic regions: Northeast, East North Central, Mountain/West North Central, South Atlantic, East South Central, West South Central, and Pacific. Baseline demographics and disease characteristics are described by region. For participants with 6-month follow-up data, we report treatment patterns and treatment outcomes. Results: 7520 biologic initiations from 6320 patients were available. Over time, biologic initiations in most US regions within the Registry resulted in a pattern where IL-17 inhibitors were used most frequently, followed by IL-12/23 and IL-23 inhibitors, and lastly by TNF inhibitors. Baseline disease severity varied among regions with the East South Central reporting the largest proportion (25.1%) of very severe disease by body surface area. Frequencies of metabolic comorbid diseases varied between regions (obesity, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, each P < .001; hypertension P < .019), with the East South Central reporting the largest proportions. Rates of achieving PASI75 and IGA 0/1 varied at 6-months (P = .008 and P = .001, respectively), with the East South Central reporting the lowest frequencies. At 6-months 28.2% of biologic initiations in the East South Central were discontinued, of which 22% had switched to another therapy. Conclusion: Providers should be aware of regional trends in disease characteristics to improve overall care of psoriasis patients.

On and off-label uses of interleukin-17 inhibitors for patients with plaque-type psoriasis in Thailand: a real-world study

BACKGROUND

Off-label uses of biologics in the treatment of psoriasis are usually implemented in limited-resource settings and studies regarding their response profiles are limited.

METHOD

This was a retrospective study performed in moderate-to-severe plaque-type psoriasis patients who had been treated with either secukinumab, ixekizumab or brodalumab at a university hospital in Thailand between 1 January 2017 and 1 April 2021.

RESULTS

A total of 142 patients were included in the data analysis consisting of three groups of 48 patients, 86 patients, and 8 patients treated by secukinumab, ixekizumab, and brodalumab, respectively. Patients were then classified into five groups according to the dosing pattern they received; on-label, off-label with induction, off-label with specific pattern, off-label with irregular dosing interval <8 weeks and >8 weeks. Considering both secukinumab and ixekizumab, the adjusted hazard ratios (95%CI) for complete skin clearance of the four off-label regimens were 2.2(0.9-5.2), 1.9 (0.9-3.9), 1.0 (0.4-2.2), and 1.6 (0.7-3.6), compared to on-label regimen, respectively. In each biologic drug, almost all off-label dosing regimens demonstrated higher adjusted hazard ratios compared to on-label regimen.

CONCLUSION

Off-label, patient-oriented regimens could be a promising choice of IL-17 inhibitors for administration in special settings. Off-label regimens are not inferior in terms of skin clearance to an on-label regimen in the efficacy of psoriasis treatment of secukinumab and ixekizumab but do cause more flares. The decision to use off-label regimens must account for the benefits and associated risks.

Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Psoriasis is an immune-mediated disease with either skin or joints manifestations, or both, and it has a major impact on quality of life. Although there is currently no cure for psoriasis, various treatment strategies allow sustained control of disease signs and symptoms. The relative benefit of these treatments remains unclear due to the limited number of trials comparing them directly head-to-head, which is why we chose to conduct a network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of non-biological systemic agents, small molecules, and biologics for people with moderate-to-severe psoriasis using a network meta-analysis, and to provide a ranking of these treatments according to their efficacy and safety.

SEARCH METHODS

For this update of the living systematic review, we updated our searches of the following databases monthly to October 2021: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, and Embase.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of systemic treatments in adults over 18 years with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, at any stage of treatment, compared to placebo or another active agent. The primary outcomes were: proportion of participants who achieved clear or almost clear skin, that is, at least Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90; proportion of participants with serious adverse events (SAEs) at induction phase (8 to 24 weeks after randomisation).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We conducted duplicate study selection, data extraction, risk of bias assessment and analyses. We synthesised data using pairwise and network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare treatments and rank them according to effectiveness (PASI 90 score) and acceptability (inverse of SAEs). We assessed the certainty of NMA evidence for the two primary outcomes and all comparisons using CINeMA, as very low, low, moderate, or high. We contacted study authors when data were unclear or missing. We used the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) to infer treatment hierarchy, from 0% (worst for effectiveness or safety) to 100% (best for effectiveness or safety).

MAIN RESULTS

This update includes an additional 19 studies, taking the total number of included studies to 167, and randomised participants to 58,912, 67.2% men, mainly recruited from hospitals. Average age was 44.5 years, mean PASI score at baseline was 20.4 (range: 9.5 to 39). Most studies were placebo-controlled (57%). We assessed a total of 20 treatments. Most (140) trials were multicentric (two to 231 centres). One-third of the studies (57/167) had high risk of bias; 23 unclear risk, and most (87) low risk. Most studies (127/167) declared funding by a pharmaceutical company, and 24 studies did not report a funding source. Network meta-analysis at class level showed that all interventions (non-biological systemic agents, small molecules, and biological treatments) showed a higher proportion of patients reaching PASI 90 than placebo. Anti-IL17 treatment showed a higher proportion of patients reaching PASI 90 compared to all the interventions, except anti-IL23. Biologic treatments anti-IL17, anti-IL12/23, anti-IL23 and anti-TNF alpha showed a higher proportion of patients reaching PASI 90 than the non-biological systemic agents. For reaching PASI 90, the most effective drugs when compared to placebo were (SUCRA rank order, all high-certainty evidence): infliximab (risk ratio (RR) 50.19, 95% CI 20.92 to 120.45), bimekizumab (RR 30.27, 95% CI 25.45 to 36.01), ixekizumab (RR 30.19, 95% CI 25.38 to 35.93), risankizumab (RR 28.75, 95% CI 24.03 to 34.39). Clinical effectiveness of these drugs was similar when compared against each other. Bimekizumab, ixekizumab and risankizumab showed a higher proportion of patients reaching PASI 90 than other anti-IL17 drugs (secukinumab and brodalumab) and guselkumab. Infliximab, anti-IL17 drugs (bimekizumab, ixekizumab, secukinumab and brodalumab) and anti-IL23 drugs (risankizumab and guselkumab) except tildrakizumab showed a higher proportion of patients reaching PASI 90 than ustekinumab and three anti-TNF alpha agents (adalimumab, certolizumab and etanercept). Ustekinumab was superior to certolizumab; adalimumab and ustekinumab were superior to etanercept. No significant difference was shown between apremilast and two non-biological drugs: ciclosporin and methotrexate. We found no significant difference between any of the interventions and the placebo for the risk of SAEs. The risk of SAEs was significantly lower for participants on methotrexate compared with most of the interventions. Nevertheless, the SAE analyses were based on a very low number of events with low- to moderate-certainty for all the comparisons (except methotrexate versus placebo, which was high-certainty). The findings therefore have to be viewed with caution. For other efficacy outcomes (PASI 75 and Physician Global Assessment (PGA) 0/1), the results were similar to the results for PASI 90. Information on quality of life was often poorly reported and was absent for several of the interventions.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Our review shows that, compared to placebo, the biologics infliximab, bimekizumab, ixekizumab, and risankizumab were the most effective treatments for achieving PASI 90 in people with moderate-to-severe psoriasis on the basis of high-certainty evidence. This NMA evidence is limited to induction therapy (outcomes measured from 8 to 24 weeks after randomisation), and is not sufficient for evaluating longer-term outcomes in this chronic disease. Moreover, we found low numbers of studies for some of the interventions, and the young age (mean 44.5 years) and high level of disease severity (PASI 20.4 at baseline) may not be typical of patients seen in daily clinical practice. We found no significant difference in the assessed interventions and placebo in terms of SAEs, and the safety evidence for most interventions was low to moderate quality. More randomised trials directly comparing active agents are needed, and these should include systematic subgroup analyses (sex, age, ethnicity, comorbidities, psoriatic arthritis). To provide long-term information on the safety of treatments included in this review, an evaluation of non-randomised studies and postmarketing reports from regulatory agencies is needed. Editorial note: This is a living systematic review. Living systematic reviews offer a new approach to review updating, in which the review is continually updated, incorporating relevant new evidence as it becomes available. Please refer to the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for the current status of this review.

Enabling precision monitoring of psoriasis treatment by optoacoustic mesoscopy

Psoriasis is a widespread inflammatory skin disease affecting about 2% of the general population. Recently, treatments that specifically target key proinflammatory cytokines driving the disease have been developed to complement conventional therapies with unspecific antiproliferative or anti-inflammatory effects. Efficient monitoring of treatment efficacy in the context of precision medicine and the assessment of new therapeutics require accurate noninvasive readouts of disease progression. However, characterization of psoriasis treatment remains subjective based on visual and palpatory clinical assessment of features observed on the skin surface. We hypothesized that optoacoustic (photoacoustic) mesoscopy could offer label-free assessment of inflammation biomarkers, extracted from three-dimensional (3D) high-resolution images of the human skin, not attainable by other noninvasive methods. We developed a second-generation ultra-broadband optoacoustic mesoscopy system, featuring sub-10-μm resolution and advanced motion correction technology, and performed 80 longitudinal measurements of 20 psoriatic skin plaques in humans under conventional inpatient treatment or receiving biologics with concomitant topical corticosteroid treatment. Optoacoustic image analysis revealed inflammatory and morphological skin features that indicated treatment efficacy with sensitivity, accuracy, and precision that was not possible using clinical metrics. We identify 3D imaging biomarkers that reveal responses to treatment and offer the potential to facilitate disease and treatment characterization. Our findings suggest that optoacoustic mesoscopy may offer a method of choice for yielding both qualitative and quantitative evaluations of skin treatments that are inaccessible by other methods, potentially enabling optimized therapies and precision medicine in dermatology.

Number Needed to Treat Network Meta-Analysis to Compare Biologic Drugs for Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis

INTRODUCTION

Number needed to treat (NNT) estimates are a practical metric to help identify the most effective therapies. Our objective is to compare 11 biologic drugs for moderate-to-severe psoriasis in terms of NNT.

METHODS

The NNT data were obtained from a Bayesian network meta-analysis of 42 double-blind, randomized, phase 3 clinical trials for 11 biologics (adalimumab, brodalumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, guselkumab, infliximab, ixekizumab, risankizumab, secukinumab, tildrakizumab, and ustekinumab). We determined NNT to achieve Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75/90/100 responses at weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 48/52 and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) response 0, 1 at week 12.

RESULTS

Highest efficacy (lowest NNT) was with brodalumab and ixekizumab for PASI 90 at weeks 4, 8, and 12; ixekizumab for PASI 90/100 at week 16; and brodalumab for PASI 100 at week 12. After 48/52 weeks, risankizumab had the highest efficacy for PASI 90/100 overlapping with guselkumab, brodalumab, and ixekizumab for PASI 90 and with brodalumab and ixekizumab for PASI 100. Ixekizumab had the highest efficacy for DLQI (0,1) at week 12.

CONCLUSIONS

Brodalumab and ixekizumab had the lowest NNTs for achieving PASI responses at early time points and were not significantly different than risankizumab and guselkumab after 48/52 weeks.

TNF-alpha inhibitors and ustekinumab for the treatment of psoriasis: therapeutic utility in the era of IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory condition for which eleven FDA-approved biologic therapies are approved. Over the past decade, studies have documented the higher efficacy of IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors for the treatment of psoriasis compared to the TNF-alpha inhibitors and ustekinumab, an IL-12/23 inhibitor. Despite this, there remains an important role for the use of TNF-alpha inhibitors and ustekinumab in the treatment of psoriasis. Here, we review how considerations of infection and malignancy risk, patient demographics, treatment resistance, and co-morbidities may make certain TNF-alpha inhibitors or ustekinumab an excellent choice for therapy in particular patient subgroups.

Cumulative Clinical Benefits of Biologics in the Treatment of Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis over 1 Year: a Network Meta-Analysis

Introduction

Both early clinical improvement and long-term maintenance of clinical efficacy of treatments matter to patients with psoriasis. We compared cumulative clinical benefits of treatment with biologics over 1 year based on the area under the curve (AUC) for Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 100 and PASI 90 responses in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis using a network meta-analysis (NMA).

Methods

Published phase 3 randomized, placebo- or active-controlled clinical trial data for biologics approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis were obtained from a systematic literature review up to 30 September 2020. Eighteen clinical trials that included data from baseline to 48 or 52 weeks where AUC could be calculated were included. Data were compared using a fixed-effect model with a separate random-effect baseline model to account for effects of the placebo arm. Cumulative clinical benefit was estimated using the AUC for PASI 100 and PASI 90 responses (complete and almost-complete skin clearance, respectively). Normalized AUC was compared using Bayesian NMA. Cumulative days of response were calculated using normalized AUC and study duration.

Results

Interleukin (IL)-17 and IL-23 inhibitors demonstrated greater cumulative clinical benefits for both PASI 100 and PASI 90 versus IL-12/23 and tumor necrosis factor inhibitors. Over 52 weeks, cumulative days with PASI 100 were greatest with ixekizumab [158.7 (95% credible interval, 147.4, 170.0) days] followed by risankizumab [154.0 (144.9, 163.4) days]; PASI 90 days were greatest with risankizumab [249.3 (239.5, 259.2) days] followed by ixekizumab [238.8 (227.1, 250.8) days]. Both ixekizumab and risankizumab showed greater cumulative days with PASI 100 or PASI 90 responses versus secukinumab [117.9 (110.7, 125.2) and 215.5 (208.2, 223.1) days, respectively] and greater cumulative days with PASI 100 versus guselkumab [130.7 (120.5, 140.9) days].

Conclusion

For complete and almost-complete skin clearance, ixekizumab and risankizumab provided the greatest cumulative clinical benefits over 1 year.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13555-022-00690-5.

Methods to assess evidence consistency in dose-response model based network meta-analysis

Network meta-analysis (NMA) simultaneously estimates multiple relative treatment effects based on evidence that forms a network of treatment comparisons. Heterogeneity in treatment definitions, such as dose, can lead to a violation of the consistency assumption that underpins NMA. Model-based NMA (MBNMA) methods have been proposed that allow functional dose-response relationships to be estimated within an NMA, which avoids lumping different doses together and thereby reduces the likelihood of inconsistency. Dose-response MBNMA relies on appropriate specification of the dose-response relationship as well as consistency of relative effects. In this article we describe methods to check for inconsistency in dose-response MBNMA models. Global and local (node-splitting) tests for inconsistency are described that account for studies with ≥3 arms that are typical in dose-finding trials. We show that consistency needs to be assessed with respect to the choice of dose-response function. We illustrate the methods using a network comparing biologics for moderate-to-severe psoriasis. By comparing results from an Emax and an exponential dose-response function we show that failure to correctly characterise the dose-response can introduce apparent inconsistency. The number of comparisons for which node-splitting is possible is also shown to be dependent on the complexity of the selected dose-response function. We highlight that the nature of dose-finding studies, which typically compare multiple doses of the same agent, provide limited scope to assess inconsistency, but these study designs help guard against inconsistency in the first place. We demonstrate the importance of assessing consistency to obtain robust relative effects to inform drug-development and policy decisions.

Long-Term Benefit-Risk Profiles of Treatments for Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: A Network Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

The long-term benefit-risk profiles of licensed and investigational treatments for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis have not been fully characterized.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of licensed and investigational treatments for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis were identified through a systematic literature review through 2 May 2021. Bayesian network meta-analyses (NMAs) were conducted to compare the efficacy (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI] 75/90/100 [at least a 75/90/100% reduction in PASI score from baseline] response) and safety outcomes (any adverse event [AE], any serious AE [SAE], and AEs leading to treatment discontinuation) of each treatment evaluated between weeks 48 and 56 after baseline. Surfaces under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRAs) were calculated to evaluate the relative ranking of treatments. The benefit-risk profiles of treatments were assessed by bidimensional plots of the NMA-estimated efficacy and safety outcomes.

RESULTS

In the efficacy NMA (N = 14 RCTs), the relative rankings for PASI 75/90/100 responses by weeks 48-56 were the highest for risankizumab (SUCRA: 98.5%) and bimekizumab (83.8% for dosing every 4 weeks [Q4W], 72.7% for dosing Q4W then every 8 weeks). The PASI response rates did not differ significantly between risankizumab and the two bimekizumab regimens. Additionally, risankizumab was associated with significantly higher PASI response rates than brodalumab, guselkumab, ixekizumab, secukinumab, ustekinumab, adalimumab, and etanercept. In the safety NMAs (N = 8 RCTs), risankizumab had the highest relative rankings for all three outcomes (SUCRA: 92.1%, 82.0%, and 91.0% for any AE, any SAE, and AEs leading to treatment discontinuation, respectively). Risankizumab had a significantly lower rate of any AE than bimekizumab, ustekinumab, and secukinumab.

CONCLUSIONS

Risankizumab was associated with the most favorable long-term benefit-risk profile for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Although ixekizumab and bimekizumab had favorable efficacy profiles, both treatments had lower rankings for safety outcomes.

Network meta-analyses in psoriasis: overview and critical discussion

Network meta-analyses (NMAs) increasingly assist in treatment decisions in disease areas such as psoriasis, where data from multiple clinical trials (CTs) on a growing number of different drugs become available. This study aimed to characterize NMAs published in psoriasis. A systematic literature search in PubMed was conducted using a structured search protocol based on the PRISMA criteria. Twenty-seven NMAs were identified, including an average of 43 CTs per NMA. Only eight of 27 NMAs (29.6%) were documented in the PROSPERO registry and only 17 (63%) reported following the PRISMA criteria. The mean number of patients per NMA was 19 624 (range: 6113-51 749). Across all NMAs, the drugs most frequently included were ustekinumab (n = 27 NMAs), followed by adalimumab (n = 25), infliximab and etanercept (n = 24 each). In all n = 27 NMAs, placebo comparisons and in n = 25, comparisons with active controls were used for bridging. Effect estimates were performed in all cases, SUCRA in 14. Most frequently used outcomes were Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 (n = 25) and PASI 90 (n = 24), and Dermatology Life Quality Index (n = 10). NMAs mostly measured induction efficacy (weeks 10-16, n = 25) but rarely long-term outcomes (weeks 48-56, n = 4). Sensitivity analyses were performed in n = 17 (63%) of the studies. Main results varied considerably between studies and depended on the year of publication and thus the number of available drugs and studies. However, the concordance between NMA efficacy rankings based on PASI 75 was high. Although a large number of NMAs have been published on psoriasis showing highly comparable results on efficacy, no sufficient information on the quality criteria was reported, and PROSPERO registry criteria were not followed. This argues in favour of greater standardization of NMA methodology and reporting.

Brodalumab Is Associated with High Rates of Complete Clearance and Quality of Life Improvement: A Subgroup Analysis of Patients with Psoriasis and Concomitant Psoriatic Arthritis

BACKGROUND

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory disease associated with psoriasis that significantly impairs physical function and quality of life (QoL). Prompt therapeutic intervention is crucial for limiting PsA progression and preventing disability.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of brodalumab versus ustekin-umab and the impact on QoL in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, by concomitant PsA status.

METHODS

This post hoc analysis of pooled data from the phase 3 AMAGINE-2 and -3 trials evaluated complete skin clearance (100% improvement of Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI 100]), improvement in symptom severity (Psoriasis Symptom Inventory [PSI] response), and QoL (Dermatology Life Quality Index [DLQI] score of 0/1) by concomitant PsA status. A competing risk model assessed cumulative incidence over 52 weeks with outcomes of PASI 100 or inadequate response.

RESULTS

This analysis included 929 patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Concomitant PsA was present in 79/339 (23%) and 110/590 (19%) patients receiving brodalumab 210 mg and ustekinumab, respectively. At Week 52, odds ratios (ORs) (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) for complete clearance with brodalumab versus ustekin-umab were 3.15 (1.52-6.55, p = 0.0015) in patients with concomitant PsA and 3.05 (2.19-4.26, p < 0.0001) in patients without concomitant PsA. Corresponding Week 52 ORs (95% CIs) for DLQI 0/1 with brodalumab versus ustekinumab were 2.05 (1.07-3.90, p = 0.0277) and 1.83 (1.32-2.53, p = 0.0002); Week 52 ORs (95% CIs) for PSI ≤8 with brodalumab versus ustekinumab were 3.42 (1.43-8.18, p = 0.0036) and 1.40 (1.01-1.95, p = 0.0434). The 52-week cumulative incidence of patients achieving PASI 100 was significantly higher for brodalumab versus ustekinumab in patients with concomitant PsA (p = 0.0001) and in those without concomitant PsA (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with brodalumab rapidly results in high levels of complete and sustained skin clearance and greater cumulative treatment benefit in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis versus ustekinumab, regardless of concomitant PsA status.

Efficacy of Brodalumab and Guselkumab in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis Who are Inadequate Responders to Ustekinumab: A Matching Adjusted Indirect Comparison

Purpose

Both brodalumab and guselkumab improve skin clearance in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis after inadequate response to ustekinumab. In the absence of a direct head-to-head comparison, the relative efficacy of brodalumab and guselkumab in non-responders to ustekinumab were compared using a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC).

Patients and Methods

Individual patient data for brodalumab (n = 121) were pooled from the AMAGINE-2 and -3 trials and adjusted using a propensity score reweighting method, so that baseline and week 16 characteristics matched the aggregate published data of patients with an inadequate response to ustekinumab who switched to guselkumab (n = 135) in the NAVIGATE trial.

Results

After inadequate response to ustekinumab, brodalumab resulted in significantly higher psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) 90 rates versus guselkumab at post-treatment switch week 12 (62.7% vs 48.1%, relative difference 14.6% [95% confidence interval [CI] 5.3–23.9], p = 0.002 [number needed to treat [NNT] = 6.8]) and week 36 (63.7% vs 51.1%; relative difference 12.6% [95% CI 4.1–21.0]; p = 0.004 [NNT = 7.9]) and PASI 100 rate at week 36 (40.3% vs 20.0%; relative difference 20.3% [95% CI 11.8–28.7]; p < 0.001 [NNT = 4.9]).

Conclusion

In this MAIC, brodalumab was associated with greater improvements than guselkumab in inadequate responders to ustekinumab. Switching to brodalumab in such patients may be a more effective strategy than switching to guselkumab.

Model-Based Meta-Analysis in Psoriasis: A Quantitative Comparison of Biologics and Small Targeted Molecules

Background: The response time-course information of biologics and small targeted molecules for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis which helps clinicians to understand the onset of action and maintenance of effect are unclear. Quantitative information about the efficacy comparation of different systemic agents are needed.

Methods: Model-based meta-analysis was conducted and longitudinal models were developed by applying two clinical end points commonly reported in the clinical trials of psoriasis: the proportion of patients achieving ≥75% reduction from baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score (PASI75) and the proportion of patients achieving ≥90% reduction from baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score (PASI90).

Results: A total of 80 trials of thirteen biological agents and four small targeted molecules covering 235 treatment arms and 40323 patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis were included in this analysis. The drugs were divided into five classes of biologics and three classes of small molecules. Two longitudinal models of PASI75 and PASI90 were used to describe the time-varying drug effect and dose-effect relationship. The typical response-time courses for PASI75 and PASI90 increased over time and finally reached to the platform. For PASI75 end point at week 12, of all the therapeutic drugs, risankizumab administered as 150 mg at week 0, week 4, and q12w showed the most efficacious with PASI75 was 85.95% (95%CI, 75.71–92.60%), followed by ixekizumab administered as 160 mg at week 0, and q4w with PASI75 was 85.9% (95%CI, 76.12–92.79%). As for PASI90 end point at week 12, ixekizumab 160 mg at week 0, and q4w showed the greatest percentage of person achieved PASI90 (67.2%; 95%CI, 49.91–77.2%), followed by risankizumab 150 mg at week 0, week 4, and q12w (65.5%; 95%CI, 47.8–75.7%). What’s more, the risankizumab provided the highest response of PASI90 at week 16 and week 24.

Conclusions: This study provided a quantitative efficacy comparation of 17 systemic agents for psoriasis in term of efficacy only and that safety was not considered. Risankizumab and ixekizumab showed superiority for both the two end points.

Assessing the Quality and Coherence of Network Meta-Analyses of Biologics in Plaque Psoriasis: What Does All This Evidence Synthesis Tell Us?

INTRODUCTION

A range of treatments are available for moderate-to-severe psoriasis; however, there remains a paucity of direct comparisons of these in head-to-head trials. Network meta-analyses (NMA) allow comparisons of these to support clinical decision making. This systematic literature review assesses the methodological quality of NMAs available for moderate-to-severe psoriasis and compares their methods and results. Their validity and applicability for current practice is also assessed.

METHODS

A systematic review of published NMAs of at least two biologics for moderate-to-severe psoriasis was undertaken. Embase, MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, and the Cochrane Library were last searched on 19 February 2020. The quality of NMAs was assessed using the International Society of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) criteria. NMA methodology, funding, and results were compared and differences in results explored.

RESULTS

Twenty-five analyses evaluating up to 19 different treatments at 8-24 weeks, and two analyses at 1 year, were included. Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) response was assessed in 23, facilitating comparisons between NMAs. All NMAs met at least half of the ISPOR criteria. The major limitations were explaining the rationale for methodology, exploring effect modifiers, and consistency between direct and indirect estimates. The analyses differed in model type (Bayesian or frequentist), analysis of PASI response (binomial or multinomial), and analysis of different treatment doses (separate or pooled). PASI results were broadly similar, except for the Cochrane Collaboration NMA which provided lower estimates of treatment efficacy versus placebo. This analysis differed methodologically from others, including pooling data for different doses.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on PASI 90 at induction, the majority of recent NMAs came to similar conclusions: interleukin (IL) 17 inhibitors (brodalumab, ixekizumab, secukinumab), IL-23 inhibitors (guselkumab and risankizumab) and infliximab were most efficacious, supporting the validity of NMAs in this clinical area. Decisions should be made using high-quality, up-to-date NMAs with assumptions relevant to clinical practice.

Cost per cumulative clinical benefit of biologic therapies for patients with plaque psoriasis: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Measuring cumulative clinical treatment benefit over time captures speed and magnitude of effects. Assessing the cost of biologics relative to their cumulative clinical benefits versus a single time point represents an alternative to evaluate the value of a given biologic used to treat psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: To compare cumulative benefit and cost per cumulative benefit of biologics in treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis from a network meta-analysis (NMA). METHODS: Biologics included in the analysis were ixekizumab, adalimumab, guselkumab, ustekinumab, secukinumab, risankizumab, and certolizumab pegol. Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) responses over the initial 16-week treatment period were obtained from 31 articles. Cumulative benefits for PASI 75, PASI 90, and PASI 100 responses were measured as area under the curve (AUC) using the trapezoidal method. Bayesian-based NMA modeled percent maximum AUC through week 16 (%Max_AUCW16). The AUC estimates over 16 weeks were converted to total skin clearance threshold days achieved for PASI 75, PASI 90, and PASI 100 with each biologic. Cost per cumulative benefit was estimated by multiplying number of doses (per FDA label) by nationally representative discounted wholesale acquisition costs (WACs) for 16 weeks of treatment divided by %Max_AUCW16. The primary cost analysis used WACs, including week 16 doses. Co-primary cost analysis used discounted WACs, including week 16 doses. Sensitivity analysis was conducted using WACs and discounted WACs, excluding doses administered at week 16. RESULTS: Among biologics with available week 16 AUC data for PASI 90 and PASI 100, cumulative benefits over the initial 16-week treatment period ranged from 20.2% (certolizumab pegol) to 47.0% (ixekizumab) for PASI 90 and from 7.4% (adalimumab) to 22.2% (ixekizumab) for PASI 100. The total number of estimated PASI 90 and PASI 100 days achieved over the first 16 weeks of treatment was highest with ixekizumab (53 days and 25 days, respectively). In the primary analysis, guselkumab had the lowest cost per cumulative benefit (95% credible interval [CrI]; $99,742 [$89,941-$111,653]), followed by ixekizumab ($108,906 [$95,928-$126,093]) and adalimumab ($111,233 [$97,549-$129,022]) for PASI 90, and ixekizumab had the lowest cost per cumulative benefit ($230,884 [$191,611-$291,115]), followed by secukinumab ($238,945 [$204,029-$288,072]) and risankizumab ($279,968 [$250,683-$316,872]) for PASI 100 responses. In the co-primary analysis, ixekizumab had the lowest discounted cost per AUC (95% CrI; $60,988 [$53,719-$70,612]), followed by guselkumab ($66,827 [$60,260-$74,807]) and secukinumab ($69,622 [$61,783-$79,786]) for PASI 90, and ixekizumab had the lowest cost per cumulative benefit ($129,295 [$107,302-$163,024]), followed by secukinumab ($148,146 [$126,498-$178,605]) and guselkumab ($188,190 [$166,791-$215,969]) for PASI 100 responses. Conclusions: Among biologics studied, ixekizumab demonstrated the greatest cumulative clinical benefit, maintaining the lowest cost per cumulative benefit for PASI 100 responses and lowest discounted cost per cumulative benefit for PASI 90 and PASI 100 responses for moderate to severe psoriasis over the initial 16-week treatment period. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by Eli Lilly and Company (Indianapolis, IN). Blauvelt has served as a scientific adviser and/or clinical study investigator for AbbVie, Aclaris, Almirall, Arena, Athenex, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Dermavant, Dermira, Eli Lilly and Company, Forte, Galderma, Incyte, Janssen, Leo, Novartis, Ortho, Pfizer, Rapt, Regeneron, Sandoz, Sanofi Genzyme, Sun Pharma, and UCB Pharma and as a paid speaker for AbbVie. Burge, Zhu, Malatestinic, Brnabic, Guo, and Janardhanan are employees and shareholder of Eli Lilly and Company.

The attentive focus on T cell-mediated autoimmune pathogenesis of psoriasis, lichen planus and vitiligo

T cell-mediated autoimmune skin diseases develop as a result of the aberrant immune response to the skin cells with T cells playing a central role. These chronic inflammatory skin diseases encompass various types including psoriasis, lichen planus and vitiligo. These diseases show similarities in their immune-pathophysiology. In the last decade, immunomodulating agents have been very successful in the management of these diseases thanks to a better understanding of the pathophysiology. In this review, we will discuss the immunopathogenic mechanisms and highlight the role of T lymphocytes in psoriasis, lichen planus and vitiligo. This study could provide new insights into a better understanding of targeted therapeutic pathways and biological therapies.

Comparing the efficacy and tolerability of biologic therapies in psoriasis: an updated network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The rapid expansion of psoriasis biologics has led to an urgent need to understand their relative efficacy and tolerability to inform treatment decisions better and, specifically, to inform guideline development.

OBJECTIVES

To update a 2017 meta-analysis on the comparative efficacy and tolerability of biologic treatments for psoriasis.

METHODS

We searched the MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), published up to 7 September 2018, of 11 licensed, NICE-approved biologics targeting tumour necrosis factor (adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, certolizumab pegol), interleukin (IL)-12/IL-23p40 (ustekinumab), IL-17A (secukinumab, ixekizumab), IL-17RA (brodalumab) and IL-23p19 (guselkumab, tildrakizumab, risankizumab). A frequentist network meta-analysis ascertained direct or indirect evidence comparing biologics with one another, methotrexate or placebo. This was combined with hierarchical cluster analyses to consider efficacy (≥ 90% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90) or Physician's Global Assessment 0 or 1; PASI 75; Dermatology Life Quality Index improvement) and tolerability (drug withdrawal due to adverse events) outcomes at 10-16 weeks, followed by assessments of study quality, heterogeneity and inconsistency.

RESULTS

We identified 62 RCTs presenting data on direct comparisons (31 899 participants). All biologics were efficacious compared with placebo or methotrexate at 10-16 weeks. Hierarchical cluster analyses revealed that adalimumab, brodalumab, certolizumab pegol, guselkumab, risankizumab, secukinumab, tildrakizumab and ustekinumab were comparable with respect to high short-term efficacy and tolerability. Infliximab and ixekizumab clustered together, with high short-term efficacy but relatively lower tolerability than the other agents, although the number of drug withdrawal events across the network was low, so these findings should be treated with caution.

CONCLUSIONS

Using our methodology we found that most biologics cluster together with respect to short-term efficacy and tolerability, and we did not identify any single agent as 'best'. These data need to be interpreted in the context of longer-term efficacy, effectiveness data, safety, posology and drug acquisition costs when making treatment decisions.

Adalimumab changes the expression profile of selected BCL-2 family genes

Biological drugs are an alternative to treatment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Adalimumab is a representative of the anti-TNF group. The underlying of this disease is a cellular homeostasis disorder-apoptosis. Many proteins are involved in the apoptosis induction pathways, including those from the BCL-2 family. The aim of the study was to perform a transcriptional analysis of the genes coding selected proteins from the BCL-2 family in patients treated with adalimumab therapy, and to determine the direction of these changes. The test materials were peripheral blood mononuclear cells. The cells were obtained from 20 patients with psoriatic arthritis who were being treated with adalimumab (study group) and 20 healthy volunteers (control). The gene expression profile was determined using the real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction technique. Statistically significant changes were observed in the expression level of the BNIP3, BNIP3L, and BCL2L1 genes (p < .05) during a 24-month observation of therapy. We indicated that adalimumab therapy has an impact on the expression of the analyzed genes, which may constitute a new class of molecular markers for assessing the effectiveness of a therapy. It appears that the BNIP3L gene could be used as a potential diagnostic marker of psoriasis.