Effectiveness of dutasteride in a large series of patients with frontal fibrosing alopecia in real clinical practice

Safety of Antiandrogens for the Treatment of Female Androgenetic Alopecia with Respect to Gynecologic Malignancies

The most common type of alopecia in women is female androgenetic alopecia (FAGA), characterized by progressive hair loss in a patterned distribution. Many oral therapies, including spironolactone (an aldosterone antagonist), androgen receptor blockers (e.g., flutamide/bicalutamide), 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors (e.g., finasteride/dutasteride), and oral contraceptives, target the mechanism of androgen conversion and binding to its respective receptor and therefore could be administered for the treatment of FAGA. Despite significant advances in the oral treatment of FAGA, its management in patients with a history of gynecological malignancies, the most common cancers in women worldwide, may still be a concern. In this review, we focus on the safety of antiandrogens for the treatment of FAGA patients. For this purpose, a targeted literature review was conducted on PubMed, utilizing the relevant search terms. To sum up, spironolactone seems to be safe for the systemic treatment of FAGA, even in high-risk populations. However, a general uncertainty remains regarding the safety of other medications in patients with a history of gynecologic malignancies, and further studies are needed to evaluate their long-term safety in patients with FAGA and risk factors to establish an optimal risk assessment and treatment selection protocol.

Medical Treatment for Androgenetic Alopecia

Androgenetic alopecia is a common type of hair loss, which is generally influenced by genetic factors and systemic androgens resulting in follicular miniaturization.1 It can cause cosmetic problems leading to psychological distress among affected men and women. Effective standard medical treatments available are topical minoxidil 2 to 5%, oral finasteride, oral dutasteride, and hair transplantation.1 However, some patients do not achieve favorable results with standard treatments. For these reasons, other novel treatments have been developed, including new medications, regenerative medicines (autologous platelet-rich plasma, adipose-derived stem cells, micrograft generation, and exosome), and low-level laser therapy.

Dutasteride in the treatment of frontal fibrosing alopecia: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) is a scarring alopecia with fronto-temporo-parietal hairline recession. Although no proven treatment for FFA exists, dutasteride has been suggested as a potential treatment option. We aimed to evaluate the therapeutic response of oral dutasteride in FFA patients. The identification and selection of studies were conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis 2020 criteria. To assess the risk of bias for each study, we used the Cochrane's risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) assessment tool. A random effects model meta-analysis was performed. Estimated proportion of stabilization for eligible studies was calculated to evaluate the effectiveness of dutasteride for treating FFA. Among patients who achieved stabilization, subgroup analysis was conducted on those showing improvement. Seven studies including 366 patients who received oral dutasteride were identified. The estimated proportion of patients who experienced stabilization of FFA with oral dutasteride was 0.628 (95% CI: 0.398-0.859). In subgroup analyses of patients who experienced improvement, the estimated proportion of improvement was 0.356 (95% CI: 0.163-0.549). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, oral dutasteride revealed to be a good treatment option for disease stabilization or improvement in patients with FFA.

Unveiling a Shared Precursor Condition for Acne Keloidalis Nuchae and Primary Cicatricial Alopecias

Purpose

Small observational studies suggest subclinical disease occurrence in the normal-appearing scalp zones of several primary cicatricial alopecias. To aid patient management, we began routinely evaluating the entire scalp of patients with acne keloidalis nuchae (AKN), including trichoscopy-guided biopsies.

Patients and Methods

This retrospective study evaluated 41 patients sequentially presenting with AKN at a single clinic between June and December 2022. Primary lesions and normal-appearing scalp in the superior parietal scalp at least 5 cm away from AKN-affected zones were clinically evaluated, and areas showing perifollicular erythema or scales/casts on trichoscopy were biopsied and histologically analyzed.

Results

Forty-one men with AKN, including 20 men of African descent, 17 Hispanic, and 4 European-descended Whites, were evaluated. All patients, including 22% with associated folliculitis decalvans, showed scalp-wide trichoscopy signs of perifollicular erythema or scaling in normal-appearing scalp areas. All patients showed histologic evidence of perifollicular infundibulo-isthmic lymphocytoplasmic infiltrates and fibrosis (PIILIF), with 96% showing Vellus or miniaturized hair absence. PIILIF was often clinically mistaken for seborrheic dermatitis (44-51%). All White patients had mild papular acne keloidalis nuchae lesions mistaken for seborrheic dermatitis.

Conclusion

PIILIF may be a precursor to a wide spectrum of primary cicatricial alopecias, including AKN and folliculitis decalvans. This finding carries implications for the early diagnosis and management of AKN and other primary cicatricial alopecias.

Treatment modalities for lymphocytic and neutrophilic scarring alopecia

Primary cicatricial alopecia can result in permanent hair loss from the destruction of hair follicles. Early intervention is key in controlling disease progression, reducing symptoms, and optimizing hair density. Treatment modalities range from topical and intralesional therapies to oral medications and light therapy.

Use of 5-Alpha Reductase Inhibitors in Dermatology: A Narrative Review

Finasteride and dutasteride are 5-alpha reductase selective inhibitors (5ARIs). They were introduced as therapeutic agents for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia in 1992 and 2002, respectively; finasteride has also been approved for the treatment of androgenetic alopecia since early 2000. These agents inhibit the conversion of testosterone (T) to 5α-dihydrotestosterone (5α-DHT), limiting steroidogenesis and playing a crucial role in the physiological function of the neuroendocrine system. Therefore, it has been proposed that blocking androgen synthesis with the use of 5ARIs would be beneficial in the treatment of various diseases related to states of hyperandrogenism. This review describes the dermatological pathologies in which 5ARIs have been used as part of the treatment, evaluation of the efficacy, and knowledge of the safety profile. Specifically, we discuss the application of 5ARIs in androgenetic alopecia, acne, frontal fibrosing alopecia, hirsutism, and the implications of adverse events associated with its use to inform about the applications of 5ARIs in general dermatology practice.

Scarring Alopecia

African hair shaft and pigmented scalp have unique features that challenge diagnosis in scarring alopecia. In addition, Black patients may associate 2 or more types of hair disorders. Therefore, it is imperative to understand their findings thoroughly to establish a good diagnosis. Differential diagnosis on the frontal scalp includes traction alopecia and frontal fibrosing alopecia. Disorders such as central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia, fibrosing alopecia in a pattern distribution, discoid lupus erythematosus, and lichen planopilaris usually affect the middle scalp. Folliculitis decalvans, dissecting cellulitis, and acne keloidalis nuchae are the main differential diagnosis of the posterior scalp.

Treatment of Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia

Introduction. Frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) is known as a lymphocytic primary cicatricial alopecia. The main characteristic of FFA is progressive frontotemporal hairline recession. The pathogenesis of FFA is not completely understood. Destructing the stem cells of the epithelial hair follicles causes permanent hair loss and seems to be the main cause of FFA. Studies have reported significantly decreased quality of life in patients with hair loss. On the other hand, late diagnosis and treatment of FFA can decrease the success rate of the treatment. In this regard, different topical and systemic therapies have been developed to resolve the symptoms; however, only a partial response to treatment is usually achieved. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to identify the effectiveness of the available treatment modalities used for FFA patients and the related outcomes. Methods. On April 2022, we made a wide systematic computer-assisted search of PubMed and Google Scholar databases, using “frontal fibrosing alopecia” and “treatment” keywords. We scanned 1,514 articles. All the studies concerning a therapeutic regimen for FFA were included. After removing duplicate studies, 50 studies containing the therapeutic regimen of 1,478 FFA patients were included in this review. Results. The 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors (oral finasteride/dutasteride) were the most used medications (usually prescribed as a combination therapy with other medications). Topical corticosteroids were the second commonly used medication for the treatment of FFA. Systemic corticosteroids seem to be ineffective in improving FFA progression. Oral isotretinoin (or alitretinoin) had the most promising effect on improving facial papules of FFA patients with a 92% rate of facial papule improvement. Conclusion. In our review, intralesional corticosteroid injection and 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors (finasteride/dutasteride) were reported as the most effective treatment modalities. Oral isotretinoin (or alitretinoin) is considered as the most promising treatment for improving facial papules in the context of FFA. However, it had minimal effects on hair regrowth or stabilization of hairline recession in FFA patients.

Frontiers in Lichen Planopilaris and Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia Research: Pathobiology Progress and Translational Horizons

Lichen planopilaris (LPP) and frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) are primary, lymphocytic cicatricial hair loss disorders. These model epithelial stem cell (SC) diseases are thought to result from a CD8⁺ T-cell‒dominated immune attack on the hair follicle (HF) SC niche (bulge) after the latter has lost its immune privilege (IP) for as yet unknown reasons. This induces both apoptosis and pathological epithelial‒mesenchymal transition in epithelial SCs, thus depletes the bulge, causes fibrosis, and ultimately abrogates the HFs' capacity to regenerate. In this paper, we synthesize recent progress in LPP and FFA pathobiology research, integrate our limited current understanding of the roles that genetic, hormonal, environmental, and other factors may play, and define major open questions. We propose that LPP and FFA share a common initial pathobiology, which then bifurcates into two distinct clinical phenotypes, with macrophages possibly playing a key role in phenotype determination. As particularly promising translational research avenues toward direly needed progress in the management of these disfiguring, deeply distressful cicatricial alopecia variants, we advocate to focus on the development of bulge IP and epithelial SC protectants such as, for example, topically effective, HF‒penetrating and immunoinhibitory preparations that contain tacrolimus, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ, and/or CB1 agonists.

Lichen planopilaris and frontal fibrosing alopecia: review and update of diagnostic and therapeutic features

Lichen planopilaris and frontal fibrosing alopecia are primary scarring alopecias where diagnosis can be suggested by clinical and trichoscopy features, especially in the early stages, but scalp biopsy is the standard exam for definitive diagnosis. Frontal fibrosing alopecia is considered a variant of lichen planopilaris, as the histopathological findings are similar, with a perifollicular lymphohistiocytic infiltrate, sometimes with a lichenoid pattern. A thorough clinical examination, trichoscopy and photographic documentation are essential to assess the evolution and therapeutic response. To date, there are no validated treatments or guidelines for these diseases, but there are recommendations that vary with the individual characteristics of each patient. This article presents a comprehensive review of the literature, including an update on topics related to the diagnosis, follow-up, histopathological aspects and available treatments for lichen planopilaris and frontal fibrosing alopecia, highlighting their similarities, differences and peculiarities.

Current controversies in trichology: a European expert consensus statement

INTRODUCTION

Hair disorders are one of the most common conditions within dermatology practice but, although new diagnostic tools and therapeutic options have arisen, the management of these patients still represents a major clinical challenge.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed at gathering information and achieving consensus on relevant recommendations on the latest advances in alopecia, trichoscopy and hair dermocosmetics.

METHODS

Experts of the steering committee consulted the available evidence on trichology-related areas from the past 5 years and formulated recommendations based on the evidence and their experience. A modified two-round Delphi procedure was performed among 45 European dermatologists experts in trichology to consult their degree of agreement on twenty recommendations, using a 4-point Likert scale. Consensus was defined as >80% of participants scoring either 1 (totally agree) or 2 (agree).

RESULTS

In the first round of the Delphi questionnaire, 75% of the recommendations reached consensus. Those that were not agreed upon were reformulated by the steering committee and voted again after an online meeting, where consensus was achieved in all recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

All recommendations reached consensus after the two-round Delphi questionnaire and may be useful in clinical practice for dermatologists. The participants agreed that besides this consensus, further clinical studies are needed to assess the benefits of the emerging tools and treatments and to clarify the controversies that still exist in the field, aiming at improving patients' quality of life.

Guidelines for clinical trials of frontal fibrosing alopecia: consensus recommendations from the International FFA Cooperative Group (IFFACG)

BACKGROUND

Frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) has become one of the most common causes of cicatricial alopecia worldwide. However, there is a lack of clear aetiology and robust clinical trial evidence for the efficacy and safety of agents currently used for treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To enable data to be collected worldwide on FFA using common criteria and assessment methods.

METHODS

A multicentre, international group of experts in hair loss was convened by email to create consensus recommendations for clinical trials. Consensus was defined at > 90% agreement on each recommended part of these guidelines.

RESULTS

Standardized diagnostic criteria, severity rating, staging, and investigator and patient assessment of scalp hair loss and other clinical features of FFA were created.

CONCLUSIONS

These guidelines should allow the collection of reliable aggregate data on FFA and advance efforts in both clinical and basic research to close knowledge gaps in this condition.

Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia: A Review

Frontal fibrosing alopecia is a scarring alopecia, the prevalence of which is increasing worldwide since its first description in 1994. The reason for this emerging epidemic may be a higher exposure to an unknown trigger, although its aethiology and pathogenesis still remain enigmatic. Clinical, trichoscopic, sonographic, and histopathologic findings are allowing clinicians to understand more aspects about this type of cicatricial alopecia. Several treatments have been used in frontal fibrosing alopecia, although the 5-alpha reductase inhibitors seem to be the most promising. The aim of this report is to provide a compilation about the published data regarding frontal fibrosing alopecia in a narrative review.

Optimal Management of Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia: A Practical Guide

Frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) is a primary lymphocytic cicatricial alopecia that is often considered a clinical variant of lichen planopilaris (LPP) due to their shared histopathologic features. FFA is characterized by the recession of the frontal, temporal, or frontotemporal hairline; the clinical pattern is distinct and usually includes eyebrow hair loss, as well as other associated symptoms. Pruritus, facial papules, eyelash loss, body hair involvement, and trichodynia may also occur in addition to the frontotemporal recession and eyebrow loss classically seen. Early diagnosis and prompt treatment are critical as FFA is a progressive disorder that can result in permanent hair loss. FFA is challenging as patients may not present or be recognized until the disease has progressed. Additionally, there is currently no consensus or standard treatment regimen for FFA. While many different therapies have been reported as beneficial, there are a limited number of published guidelines for the treatment of FFA. This article is a review of the literature on treatment modalities for FFA and the objective is to offer a practical guide for clinicians on the evidence-based management options currently available in the literature.