The efficacy and tolerability of tetracyclines and clindamycin plus rifampicin for the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa: Results of a prospective European cohort study

[Hidradenitis suppurativa]

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin and systemic disease that is associated with considerable discomfort and a significant reduction in the quality of life. Despite a significantly increased understanding of the disease, the diagnosis is still delayed for many years. Delayed patient access to suitable treatment often leads to disease progression with increased surgical interventions and the occurrence of possible comorbidities. In recent years, there has been an improved understanding of the pathophysiology and, as a result the authorization of modern therapeutic agents for HS. The treatment of HS is based on three treatment pillars: surgery, antibiotics and biologics. Additionally, risk factors, such as smoking and obesity should be positively influenced. Knowledge of comorbidities and their interdisciplinary treatment is important for the individualized care of patients.

S2k‐Leitlinie zur Therapie der Hidradenitis suppurativa/Acne inversa – Kurzfassung

Die S2k‐Leitlinie der Hidradenitis suppurativa/Acne inversa (HS/AI) soll eine akzeptierte Entscheidungshilfe für die Auswahl/Durchführung einer geeigneten/suffizienten Therapie liefern. Hidradenitis suppurativa/Acne inversa ist eine chronisch‐rezidivierende, entzündliche, potenziell mutilierende Hauterkrankung des terminalen Haartalgdrüsenapparats, mit schmerzhaften, entzündlichen Läsionen in den apokrinen drüsenreichen Körperregionen. Ihre Punktprävalenz in Deutschland ist 0,3%, sie wird mit einer Verspätung von 10,0 ± 9,6 Jahren diagnostiziert. Abnormale Differenzierung der Keratinozyten des Haartalgdrüsenapparats und eine begleitende Entzündung bilden die zentrale pathogenetische Grundlage. Primäre HS/AI‐Läsionen sind entzündliche Knoten, Abszesse und drainierende Tunnel. Rezidive in den letzten 6 Monaten mit mindestens zwei Läsionen an den Prädilektionsstellen verweisen auf eine HS/AI mit einer 97‐prozentigen Genauigkeit. HS/AI‐Patienten leiden an einer deutlichen Einschränkung der Lebensqualität. Zur korrekten Therapieentscheidung sollen Klassifikation und Aktivitätsbewertung mit einem validierten Instrument erfolgen, wie dem International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Scoring System (IHS4). Hidradenitis suppurativa/Acne inversa wird nach der Ausprägung der nachweisbaren Entzündung in zwei Formen eingeteilt: aktive, entzündliche (milde, mittelschwere und schwere nach IHS4) und vorwiegend inaktive, nicht entzündliche (Hurley‐Grad‐I, ‐II und ‐III) HS/AI. Orale Tetrazykline oder eine 5‐tägige intravenöse Therapie mit Clindamycin sind mit der Effektivität von Clindamycin/Rifampicin vergleichbar. Subkutan applizierbares Adalimumab, Secukinumab und Bimekizumab sind für die Therapie der HS/AI zugelassen. Für die vorwiegend nicht entzündliche Erkrankungsform stehen verschiedene operative Verfahren zur Verfügung. Medikamentöse/chirurgische Kombinationen gelten als ganzheitliches Therapieverfahren.

S2k guideline for the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa / acne inversa - Short version

The S2k guideline on hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa (HS/AI) aims to provide an accepted decision aid for the selection/implementation of appropriate/sufficient therapy. HS/AI is a chronic recurrent, inflammatory, potentially mutilating skin disease of the terminal hair follicle-glandular apparatus, with painful, inflammatory lesions in the apocrine gland-rich regions of the body. Its point prevalence in Germany is 0.3%, it is diagnosed with a delay of 10.0 ± 9.6 years. Abnormal differentiation of the keratinocytes of the hair follicle-gland apparatus and accompanying inflammation form the central pathogenetic basis. Primary HS/AI lesions are inflammatory nodules, abscesses and draining tunnels. Recurrences in the last 6 months with at least 2 lesions at the predilection sites point to HS/AI with a 97% accuracy. HS/AI patients suffer from a significant reduction in quality of life. For correct treatment decisions, classification and activity assessment should be done with a validated tool, such as the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Scoring System (IHS4). HS/AI is classified into two forms according to the degree of detectable inflammation: active, inflammatory (mild, moderate, and severe according to IHS4) and predominantly inactive, non-inflammatory (Hurley grade I, II and III) HS/AI. Oral tetracyclines or 5-day intravenous therapy with clindamycin are equal to the effectiveness of clindamycin/rifampicin. Subcutaneously administered adalimumab, secukinumab and bimekizumab are approved for the therapy of HS/AI. Various surgical procedures are available for the predominantly non-inflammatory disease form. Drug/surgical combinations are considered a holistic therapy method.

Improved clinical effectiveness of adalimumab when initiated with clindamycin and rifampicin in hidradenitis suppurativa

BACKGROUND

Adalimumab monotherapy for hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is often insufficient with a maximum clinical efficacy of 60% in Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) and limited effect on draining tunnels. Data suggest that adalimumab therapy could be improved by concomitant antibiotics.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical effectiveness of adalimumab with clindamycin and rifampicin versus adalimumab monotherapy after 12 weeks.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients who started adalimumab with additional clindamycin and rifampicin and patients treated with adalimumab monotherapy, matched on sex and refined Hurley score. The primary outcome measure was the difference in change in the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4) at 12 weeks.

RESULTS

In total, 62 patients were included in the combination therapy group (n = 31) and adalimumab monotherapy group (n = 31), showing comparable IHS4 scores; 32.5 versus 29, p = 0.87 at baseline respectively. The combination therapy demonstrated greater clinical effectiveness expressed in median IHS4 improvement (-20 vs. -9, p < 0.001), IHS4-55 (74% vs. 36%, p = 0.002), median draining tunnel reduction (-4 vs. -2, p < 0.001) and pain response (47% vs. 27%, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Adalimumab initiated with clindamycin and rifampicin shows greater clinical effectiveness than adalimumab monotherapy. An important difference in effect was observed in the decrease of draining tunnels, addressing a serious limitation of adalimumab monotherapy.

An evaluation of secukinumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa

INTRODUCTION

Until recently, biological therapy for hidradenitis suppurativa was limited to anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) blockade with adalimumab (ADA). However, not all patients respond to treatment with ADA. This highlighted the need for more therapeutic options. Interleukin (IL)-17/T-helper 17 (Th17) axis may play an important role in the pathophysiology of HS. Recently, the IL-17A inhibitor secukinumab, which targets IL-17A specifically and prevents it from interacting with the IL-17 receptor, has been FDA-approved for HS.

AREAS COVERED

Secukinumab, represents a novel therapeutic strategy in HS management. An overview of structural and pharmacological characteristics is provided. Described efficacy in clinical trials and case reports and safety data from is presented.

EXPERT OPINION

As response to anti-TNFas is lost over time, secukinumab has provided an alternative HS treatment option in clinical practice. Overall, secukinumab has shown good efficacy and a favorable side effect profile in HS clinical trials but may be avoided in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Long-term and real-life data on the use of secukinumab are essential for improving decision-making in HS therapy.

Rethinking Hidradenitis Suppurativa Management: Insights into Bacterial Interactions and Treatment Evolution

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), or acne inversa, is a chronic inflammatory dermatological condition characterized by painful and recurrent nodules and purulent abscesses. HS can have a devastating impact on the quality of life of patients. This condition is commonly localized to the axilla, groin, perineal, and inframammary regions, and can develop fistulas and sinus tracts over time. Its pathogenesis remains elusive and is best characterized at the moment as multi-factorial. Additionally, questions remain about the role of cutaneous dysbiosis as a primary HS trigger or as a secondary perturbation due to HS inflammation. This article features works in relation to HS and its interplay with bacterial microflora. We address current treatment approaches and their impact on HS-related bacteria, as well as areas of therapeutic innovation. In the future, disease-modifying or remittive therapy will likely combine an advanced/targeted anti-inflammatory approach with one that effectively modulates cutaneous and deep tissue dysbiosis.

Oral fusidic acid for the treatment of mild-to-moderate hidradenitis suppurativa

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a debilitating inflammatory skin disease. Tetracyclines are one of the few therapeutic options recommended for mild-to-moderate disease. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of systemic fusidic acid's (FA) effectiveness in treating HS.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed 55 FA therapy cycles (TC, average weekly dose: 6409 mg; range: 5250-9800 mg; 2-12 weeks) in 49 patients. The outcome was evaluated using the Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) scale. Therapy response was defined as any reduction of inflammatory activity without the occurrence of flares. We also characterized adverse events and investigated predictors for treatment success. Results were compared to a matched control group receiving doxycycline.

RESULTS

FA treatment (55 treatment cycles (TC); male: 45.5%; female: 54.5%) showed an overall response rate of 70.9% (39 TC). No worsening was observed. Significantly higher response rates were observed in females (83.3%, P = 0.026) and Hurley I (90.9%, P = 0.008). After multivariate adjustment, higher response rates were associated with the Hurley grade (P = 0.046) but not with gender (P = 0.0174). Adverse reactions (21.8% gastrointestinal symptoms) occurred in 27.3% (15 TC) and 46.7% within the first 4 weeks. Similar results were observed in the doxycycline control group (overall response rate: 76.4%).

CONCLUSION

Oral FA is safe and improves symptoms in most patients. HS patients could benefit from oral FA treatment, especially in case of contraindications or resistance to tetracyclines.

Treatment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Evaluation Study (THESEUS): a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, painful disease affecting flexures and other skin regions, producing nodules, abscesses and skin tunnels. Laser treatment targeting hair follicles and deroofing of skin tunnels are standard HS interventions in some countries but are rarely offered in the UK.

OBJECTIVES

To describe current UK HS management pathways and influencing factors to inform the design of future randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

THESEUS was a nonrandomized 12-month prospective cohort study set in 10 UK hospitals offering five interventions: oral doxycycline 200 mg daily; oral clindamycin and rifampicin both 300 mg twice daily for 10 weeks, extended for longer in some cases; laser treatment targeting hair follicles; deroofing; and conventional surgery. The primary outcome was the combination of clinician-assessed eligibility and participant hypothetical willingness to receive each intervention. The secondary outcomes were the proportion of participants selecting each intervention as their final treatment option; the proportion who switch treatments; treatment fidelity; and attrition rates. THESEUS was prospectively registered on the ISRCTN registry: ISRCTN69985145.

RESULTS

The recruitment target of 150 participants was met after 18 months, in July 2021, with two pauses due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Baseline demographics reflected the HS secondary care population: average age 36 years, 81% female, 20% non-White, 64% current or ex-smokers, 86% body mass index ≥ 25, 68% with moderate disease, 19% with severe disease and 13% with mild disease. Laser was the intervention with the highest proportion (69%) of participants eligible and willing to receive treatment, then deroofing (58%), conventional surgery (54%), clindamycin and rifampicin (44%), and doxycycline (37%). Laser was ranked first choice by the greatest proportion of participants (41%). Attrition rates were 11% and 17% after 3 and 6 months, respectively. Concordance with doxycycline was 52% after 3 months due to lack of efficacy, participant choice and adverse effects. Delays with procedural interventions were common, with only 43% and 26% of participants starting laser and deroofing, respectively, after 3 months. Uptake of conventional surgery was too small to characterize the intervention. Switching treatment was uncommon and there were no serious adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

THESEUS has established laser treatment and deroofing for HS in the UK and demonstrated their popularity with patients and clinicians for future RCTs.

Burden of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Systematic Literature Review of Patient Reported Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) has a profound negative impact on patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Here we summarize the evidence on HRQoL and Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) in patients with HS in real-world settings by conducting a systematic literature review (SLR) of observational studies.

METHODS

Data sources included MEDLINE, Embase & PsycINFO between January 1, 2010 and August 29, 2021, and conference proceedings between 2019 and 2021. Identified abstracts were reviewed and screened independently by two reviewers. Eligibility criteria included patients with HS of any severity, sample size ≥ 100, reporting PROs including HRQoL measures. Included studies were critically appraised.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight observational studies matched inclusion criteria. Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) was the most commonly utilized instrument: 57% of included studies reported mean baseline DLQI scores, ranging between 8.4 and 16.9, indicating a very large impact on the patients' HRQoL. Higher scores were reported with increasing disease severity and among female patients. Pain was assessed mostly by an 11-point (0-10) numeric rating scale (NRS) with a mean baseline score ranging from 3.6 to 7.7 indicating moderate to high pain levels. There was a negative impact of HS on patients' psychological well-being, based on PRO scores related to depression and anxiety. A high proportion of sexual dysfunction was reported, with a larger impact on women than men. Work productivity and leisure activity were consistently found to be impaired in patients with HS.

CONCLUSIONS

All included studies reported a negative impact of HS on patients' lives. A diverse set of disease- and non-disease-specific PRO instruments were utilized highlighting the need for more consistent use of HS-specific validated PRO instruments to assess the impact of HS on the different aspects of patients' HRQoL to allow for data to be more meaningfully interpreted and compared in real-world settings. Patients with HS need better disease management approaches that address the observed low quality of life.

Taiwanese Dermatological Association (TDA) consensus recommendations for the definition, classification, diagnosis, and management of hidradenitis suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory follicular disease characterized by painful, recurrent, inflamed lesions most commonly occurring in the axillary, inguinal, and anogenital regions. HS can inflict immense physical and psychological impact on patients who suffer from this distressing disease. Management of HS generally requires combining various medical and procedural treatment modalities; however, the disease is often recalcitrant to conventional treatments. In light of recent evidence supporting the effectiveness of biologic agents in the treatment of HS, the Taiwanese Dermatological Association established an expert panel of nine dermatologists to develop consensus statements aimed to provide up-to-date evidence-based guidance in optimizing HS patient management in Taiwan. The recommendations described in the statements were summarized in a management algorithm in terms of general care, topical treatment, systemic treatment, and procedural treatment.

Treatment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Evaluation Study: the THESEUS prospective cohort study

Background

Hidradenitis suppurativa is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterised by recurrent inflammatory lesions and skin tunnels in flexural sites such as the axilla. Deroofing of skin tunnels and laser treatment are standard hidradenitis suppurativa interventions in some countries but not yet introduced in the United Kingdom.

Objective

To understand current hidradenitis suppurativa management pathways and what influences treatment choices to inform the design of future randomised controlled trials.

Design

Prospective 12-month observational cohort study, including five treatment options, with nested qualitative interviews and an end-of-study consensus workshop.

Setting

Ten United Kingdom hospitals with recruitment led by dermatology and plastic surgery departments.

Participants

Adults with active hidradenitis suppurativa of any severity not adequately controlled by current treatment.

Interventions

Oral doxycycline 200 mg once daily; oral clindamycin and rifampicin, both 300 mg twice daily for 10 weeks initially; laser treatment targeting the hair follicle (neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet or alexandrite); deroofing; and conventional surgery.

Main outcome measures

Primary outcome was the proportion of participants who are eligible, and hypothetically willing, to use the different treatment options. Secondary outcomes included proportion of participants choosing each of the study interventions, with reasons for their choices; proportion of participants who switched treatments; treatment fidelity; loss to follow-up rates over 12 months; and efficacy outcome estimates to inform outcome measure instrument responsiveness.

Results

Between February 2020 and July 2021, 151 participants were recruited, with two pauses due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Follow-up rates were 89% and 83% after 3 and 6 months, decreasing to 70% and 44% at 9 and 12 months, respectively, because pandemic recruitment delays prevented all participants reaching their final review. Baseline demographics included an average age of 36 years, 81% female, 20% black, Asian or Caribbean, 64% current or ex-smokers and 86% with a raised body mass index. Some 69% had moderate disease, 19% severe disease and 13% mild disease. Regarding the study's primary outcome, laser treatment was the intervention with the highest proportion (69%) of participants who were eligible and hypothetically willing to receive treatment, followed by deroofing (58%), conventional surgery (54%), the combination of oral clindamycin and rifampicin (44%) and doxycycline (37%). Considering participant willingness in isolation, laser was ranked first choice by the greatest proportion (41%) of participants. The cohort study and qualitative study demonstrated that participant willingness to receive treatment was strongly influenced by their clinician. Fidelity to oral doxycycline was only 52% after 3 months due to lack of effectiveness, participant preference and adverse effects. Delays receiving procedural interventions were common, with only 43% and 26% of participants commencing laser therapy and deroofing, respectively, after 3 months. Treatment switching was uncommon and there were no serious adverse events. Daily pain score text messages were initiated in 110 participants. Daily responses reduced over time with greatest concordance during the first 14 days.

Limitations

It was not possible to characterise conventional surgery due to a low number of participants.

Conclusion

The Treatment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Evaluation Study established deroofing and laser treatment for hidradenitis suppurativa in the United Kingdom and developed a network of 10 sites for subsequent hidradenitis suppurativa randomised controlled trials.

Future work

The consensus workshop prioritised laser treatment and deroofing as interventions for future randomised controlled trials, in some cases combined with drug treatment.

Trial registration

This trial is registered as ISRCTN69985145.

Funding

This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 12/35/64) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 27, No. 30. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Pervasive genotype-by-environment interactions shape the fitness effects of antibiotic resistance mutations

The fitness effects of antibiotic resistance mutations are a major driver of resistance evolution. While the nutrient environment affects bacterial fitness, experimental studies of resistance typically measure fitness of mutants in a single environment only. We explored how the nutrient environment affected the fitness effects of rifampicin-resistant rpoB mutations in Escherichia coli under several conditions critical for the emergence and spread of resistance-the presence of primary or secondary antibiotic, or the absence of any antibiotic. Pervasive genotype-by-environment (GxE) interactions determined fitness in all experimental conditions, with rank order of fitness in the presence and absence of antibiotics being strongly dependent on the nutrient environment. GxE interactions also affected the magnitude and direction of collateral effects of secondary antibiotics, in some cases so drastically that a mutant that was highly sensitive in one nutrient environment exhibited cross-resistance to the same antibiotic in another. It is likely that the mutant-specific impact of rpoB mutations on the global transcriptome underpins the observed GxE interactions. The pervasive, mutant-specific GxE interactions highlight the importance of doing what is rarely done when studying the evolution and spread of resistance in experimental and clinical work: assessing fitness of antibiotic-resistant mutants across a range of relevant environments.

A centre-based ambulatory care concept for hidradenitis suppurativa improves disease activity, disease burden and patient satisfaction: results from the randomized controlled EsmAiL trial

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is an inflammatory disease of the inverse skin regions that occurs in young women, in particular, and affects approximately 1% of the population. Outpatient care is often inadequate and usually cannot prevent progression.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate in the EsmAiL ('Evaluation eines strukturierten und leitlinienbasierten multmodalen Versorgungskonzepts für Menschen mit Akne inversa') trial whether an innovative care concept can decrease disease activity and burden, and improve patient satisfaction.

METHODS

EsmAiL was conducted as a two-arm, multicentre, prospective, randomized controlled trial that included 553 adults with HS. Inclusion criteria were a minimum of three inflammatory lesions and at least a moderate impact of the disease on quality of life. The control group (CG) remained under standard care, while patients in the intervention group (IG) were treated according to a trial-specific, multimodal concept. The primary endpoint was the absolute change in International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4).

RESULTS

In total, 274 patients were randomized to the IG and 279 to the CG. Altogether, 377 attended the final assessment after 12 months of intervention. Participants in the IG (n = 203) achieved a mean improvement in IHS4 of 9.3 points, while the average decrease in IHS4 in patients in the CG (n = 174) was 5.7 points (P = 0.003). Patients treated under the new care concept also reported a statistically significantly higher decrease in pain, Dermatology Life Quality Index and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores compared with those in the CG (P < 0.001). Patient satisfaction was also statistically significantly higher in the IG compared with the CG (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The establishment of standardized treatment algorithms in so-called 'acne inversa centres' in the ambulatory setting has a substantial, positive impact on the course of HS and significantly improves patient satisfaction.

Hidradenitis Suppurativa and JAK Inhibitors: A Review of the Published Literature

Background: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), also known as acne inversa or Verneuil's disease, is a chronic, inflammatory, recurrent, and debilitating skin disease of the hair follicles characterized by inflammatory, painful, deep-rooted lesions in the areas of the body characterized by the presence of the apocrine glands. Unfortunately, huge unmet needs still remain for its treatment. Objective: The purpose of our review was collecting all cases, case series, trials, and ongoing studies available in the literature on the use of this class of drugs for HS. Materials and Methods: The investigated manuscripts included trials, reviews, letters to the editor, real-life studies, case series, and reports. Manuscripts were identified, screened, and extracted for the relevant data following the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) guidelines. Results: We selected 56 articles of which 25 met the selection criteria for our review. Among the JAK inhibitors to date, there is only one published clinical trial in the literature (Janus kinase 1 inhibitor INCB054707), a real-life study with 15 patients up to week 24 in which upadacitinib was used and a case series where tofacitinib was successfully used. Conversely, there are several ongoing clinical trials. Conclusions: Results to date in the literature show promising levels of efficacy and the safety of JAK inhibitors in HS. Several clinical trials are underway from which it will be very important to compare the available data. There are still too few studies conducted with a low sample size, so it remains critical to investigate this issue further in the future with a real-life study involving a large sample of patients in order to provide safe and viable therapeutic alternatives for HS.

Patient Preferences in the Management of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Results of a Multinational Discrete Choice Experiment in Europe

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Hidradenitis suppurativa is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that can lead to a substantial reduction in quality of life. Recent studies revealed high levels of unmet care needs of patients with hidradenitis suppurativa, but their preferences in treatment decision making have scarcely been investigated. This study aimed to reveal which treatment attributes adult patients with HS in Europe consider most important in treatment decision-making.

METHODS

A discrete choice experiment was conducted with adult patients with hidradenitis suppurativa in Europe to reveal which treatment attributes are most important when making treatment decisions. Participants were presented with 15 sets of two treatment options and asked for each to choose the treatment they preferred. The treatments were characterized by six attributes informed by a prior literature review and qualitative research: effectiveness, pain reduction, duration of treatment benefit, risk of mild adverse event, risk of serious infection, and mode of administration. A random parameter logit model was used to estimate patients' preferences with additional subgroup and latent class models used to explore any differences in preferences across patient groups.

RESULTS

Two hundred and nineteen adult patients with hidradenitis suppurativa were included in the analysis (90% women, mean age 38 years). For all six treatment attributes, significant differences were observed between levels. Given the range of levels of each attribute, the most important treatment attributes were effectiveness (47.9%), followed by pain reduction (17.3%), annual risk of a mild adverse event (14.4%), annual risk of a serious infection (10.3%), mode of administration (5.3%), and duration of treatment benefit (4.8%). Higher levels of effectiveness, namely a 75% or 100% reduction in the abscess and inflammatory nodule count, were preferred over levels of effectiveness primarily investigated in randomized clinical trials of hidradenitis suppurativa (a 50% reduction). Results were largely consistent across subgroups and three latent class groups were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed the most important treatment characteristics for patients with hidradenitis suppurativa that can help inform joint patient-physician decision making in the management of hidradenitis suppurativa. Designing future hidradenitis suppurativa treatments according to stated preferences, namely, to offer higher levels of effectiveness and pain improvement without higher risks of adverse events, may increase patients' treatment concordance and lead to improved disease management outcomes.

[Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Hidradenitis Suppurativa]

Hidradenitis suppurativa is a chronic and recurrent inflammatory dermatosis characterized by the presence of inflammatory nodules and abscesses in the apocrine gland-rich areas that may progress to suppurative fistulas and scars. Despite being considered one of the dermatological conditions with the greatest impact on patient quality of life, it is often underdiagnosed. Hidradenitis suppurativa, especially in its severe forms, is associated with numerous comorbidities, so a holistic and multidisciplinary perspective is crucial for the management of these patients. The therapeutic approach is complex and challenging. The medical treatment options are diverse and must be adapted to clinical presentation and disease severity. Surgical therapy should be considered as an adjuvant to medical treatment, particularly in refractory cases and in the presence of scars or anatomical and/or functional mutilation. These recommendations reflect the main aspects of the management of the patient with hidradenitis suppurativa and are addressed to all healthcare professionals who take part in their follow-up.

Overview and comparison of the clinical scores in hidradenitis suppurativa: A real-life clinical data

Introduction

Partly due to its clinical heterogeneity, hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is difficult to score accurately; illustrated by the large number of disease scores. In 2016, a systematic review by Ingram et al. reported the use of about thirty scores, and since then, this number has increased further. Our aim is twofold: to provide a succinct but detailed narrative review of the scores used to date, and to compare these scores with each other for individual patients.

Materials and methods

The review of the literature was done among articles in English and French, on Google, Google scholar, Pubmed, ScienceDirect and Cochrane. To illustrate the differences between scores, data from some Belgian patients included in the European Registry for HS were selected. A first series of patients compares the severity of the following scores: Hurley, Hurley Staging refined, three versions of Sartorius score (2003, 2007, 2009), Hidradenitis Suppurativa Physician Global Assessment (HS-PGA), International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Scoring System (IHS4), Severity Assessment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa (SAHS), Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Index (HSSI), Acne Inversa Severity Index (AISI), the Static Metascore, and one score that is not specific to HS: Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). A second set of patients illustrates how some scores change over time and with treatment: Hurley, Hurley Staging refined, Sartorius 2003, Sartorius 2007, HS-PGA, IHS4, SAHS, AISI, Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR), the very new iHS4-55, the Dynamic Metascore, and DLQI.

Results

Nineteen scores are detailed in this overview. We illustrate that for some patients, the scores do not predictably and consistently correlate with each other, either in an evaluation of the severity at a time-point t, or in the evaluation of the response to a treatment. Some patients in this cohort may be considered responders according to some scores, but non-responders according to others. The clinical heterogeneity of the disease, represented by its many phenotypes, seems partly to explain this difference.

Conclusion

These examples illustrate how the choice of a score can lead to different interpretations of the response to a treatment, or even potentially change the results of a randomized clinical trial.

Systematic review of photodynamic therapy for the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review of available literature regarding the use of 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) and ALA derivative photodynamic therapy (PDT) in the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) and provide recommendations on its use.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed of all published studies up to September 1, 2019 from nine databases, including PubMed, that evaluated PDT in the treatment of HS. For each study, quality of evidence and risk of bias was evaluated. Recommendations from the body of evidence were created based on Strength of Recommendation and Taxonomy (SORT) criteria.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies met inclusion criteria. The majority of studies had a high risk of bias. Blue light PDT with 20% ALA and red light PDT with 16% methyl aminolevulinate (MAL) demonstrated some benefit based on a small number of poor-quality studies with a high risk of bias (Grade C, level III evidence). The most promising results were for 1%-5% ALA with intralesional diode, with good to complete response in 78%-94% of anatomic sites treated (Grade B, level II evidence).

LIMITATIONS

The majority of studies contained high levels of bias, with significant heterogeneity between studies. Conclusions are limited by small samples sizes, lack of randomized controlled trials, and differing protocols.

CONCLUSION

Further studies are needed to determine the clinical efficacy of 20% ALA with blue light and MAL with red light. Intralesional diode PDT shows the most promise and warrants further investigation in larger, randomized controlled trials.

The road to biologics in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa: a nationwide drug utilization study

BACKGROUND

Prolonged systemic antibiotic treatment is often a part of management of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). Although biologic therapies are now available, the patient's treatment journey leading to biologic therapy is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To examine treatment patterns and duration of systemic treatment use in patients with HS preceding biologic therapy.

METHODS

We identified all patients with HS receiving treatment with biologics in the Danish National Patient Registry from 2010 to 2018 and extracted their entire prescription history of specific systemic treatments from the Danish National Prescription Registry since its inception in 1995. The patients' treatment journeys are graphically displayed through Sankey diagrams and box plots generated to show temporal distributions. Descriptive patient characteristics were presented as frequencies with percentages for categorical variables and as means with SDs or medians with interquartile ranges (IQRs) for continuous variables.

RESULTS

A total of 225 patients with HS were included. Patients had most frequently been treated with penicillin (n = 214; 95·1%), dicloxacillin (n = 194; 86·2%), tetracycline (n = 145; 64·4%) and rifampicin/clindamycin (n = 111; 49·3%), as well as the retinoids isotretinoin and acitretin, and dapsone. Prior to biologic therapy, patients received a mean of 4·0 (SD 1·3) different systemic therapies, across a mean of 16·9 (SD 11·3) different treatment series. The mean time from first systemic therapy until biologic therapy was initiated was 15·3 (SD 5·1) years [8·2 (SD 5·9) years when excluding penicillin and dicloxacillin].

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with HS who receive biologic therapy have long preceding treatment histories with multiple drug classes and treatment series, many of which are supported by relatively weak evidence in HS. Delay in the initiation of biologic therapy may represent a missed opportunity to prevent disease progression. What is already known about this topic? The treatment journey leading to biologic therapy in patients with HS has not previously been investigated. What does this study add? Our data from 225 patients with HS illustrate that patients who receive biologic therapy have long preceding treatment histories with multiple drug classes and treatment series, many of which are supported by relatively weak evidence in HS.

Practical Guidelines for Managing Patients With Hidradenitis Suppurativa: An Update

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, inflammatory skin disease that is characterized by the formation of comedones, papules, nodules, abscesses and sinus tracts in the axillary, inframammary, groin, and gluteal areas. Up to 3.8% of the Canadian population has HS, though due to a lack of awareness of HS, many patients are initially misdiagnosed and do not receive adequate treatment early on in the disease course. Once a diagnosis of HS is made, developing an effective management plan can be a dilemma for many providers. There is significant variability in response to any given therapy within the HS patient population and many HS patients have other medical comorbidities which must be taken into consideration. The aim of this review is to provide a practical approach for all healthcare providers to diagnose and manage HS and its associated comorbidities. A sample electronic medical record template for HS management was developed by the Canadian Hidradenitis Suppurativa Foundation Executive Board and is intended for use in clinical settings. This will help to increase collaboration between primary healthcare providers, dermatologists, and other medical specialists and ultimately improve the quality of care that HS patients receive.

Tetracyclines-An Important Therapeutic Tool for Dermatologists

Tetracyclines are a group of antibiotics whose first representative was discovered over 70 years ago. Since then, they have been of great interest in dermatology. In addition to their antibacterial activity, they are able to inhibit metalloproteinases and exhibit anti-inflammatory, anti-apoptotic and antioxidant effects. The side effects have been thoroughly studied over the years, the most characteristic and important ones in daily dermatological practice being: phototoxicity, hyperpigmentation, onycholysis, photoonycholysis, induced lupus erythematosus, and idiopathic intracranial hypertension. In this article, we summarize the use of tetracyclines in infectious diseases and inflammatory dermatoses, and further discuss the instances where the efficacy and safety of tetracyclines have been highlighted over the past few years.

Sarecycline Demonstrates Clinical Effectiveness against Staphylococcal Infections and Inflammatory Dermatoses: Evidence for Improving Antibiotic Stewardship in Dermatology

Tetracycline class antibiotics are widely used for multiple skin diseases, including acne vulgaris, acne rosacea, cutaneous infections, inflammatory dermatoses, and autoimmune blistering disorders. Concerns about antibiotic resistance and protecting the human/host microbiome beg the question whether broad-spectrum tetracyclines such as doxycycline and minocycline should be prescribed at such a high rate by dermatologists when a narrow-spectrum tetracycline derivative, sarecycline, exists. We evaluated the clinical effectiveness of oral sarecycline against cutaneous staphylococcal infections, eyelid stye, and mucous membrane pemphigoid to determine whether sarecycline is a viable option for clinicians to practice improved antibiotic stewardship. We observed significant improvement in staphylococcal infections and inflammatory dermatoses with courses of oral sarecycline as short as 9 days, with no reported adverse events. These clinical findings are consistent with in vitro microbiological data and anti-inflammatory properties of sarecycline. Our data provides a strong rationale for clinicians to use narrow-spectrum sarecycline rather than broad-spectrum tetracyclines as a first-line agent in treating staphylococcal skin infections and inflammatory skin diseases for which tetracyclines are currently commonly employed. Such advancement in the practice paradigm in dermatology will enhance antibiotic stewardship, reduce risk of antibiotic resistance, protect the human microbiome, and provide patients with precision medicine care.

New treatments and new assessment instruments for hidradenitis suppurativa

Research interest in Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS) has grown exponentially over the past decades. Several groups have worked to develop novel scores that address the drawbacks of existing investigator assessed and patient reported outcome measures currently used in HS trials, clinical practice and research. In clinical trial settings, the drawbacks of the HiSCR have become apparent; mainly it's lack of a dynamic measurement of draining tunnels. The newly developed (dichotomous) IHS4 and HASI-R are backed up by adequate validation data and are good contenders to become the new primary outcome measure in HS clinical trials. Patient reported outcomes, as well as physician reported measures, are being developed by the HIdradenitis SuppuraTiva cORe outcomes set International Collaboration (HISTORIC). For example, the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Quality of Life (HiSQOL) score is a validated measure of HS-specific quality of life and is already being used in many HS trials. Magnitude of pain measurement via a 0-10 numerical rating scale is well-established, however consensus is still required to ensure consistent administration and interpretation of the instrument. A longitudinal measurement over multiple days rather than at one time point, such as for example the Pain Index could provide increased reliability and reduced recall bias. Ultimately, these newly developed scores and tools can be included in a standardized registry to be used in routine clinical practice.

Hidradenitis Suppurativa International Online Community: Patient Characteristics and a Novel Model of Treatment Effectiveness

Treatment for hidradenitis suppurativa is diverse, yet frequently unsatisfactory. The aims of this study were to create a reproducible artificial intelligence-based patient-reported outcome platform for evaluation of the clinical characteristics and comorbidities of patients with hidradenitis suppurativa, and to use this to grade treatment effectiveness. A retrospective patient-reported outcome study was conducted, based on online questionnaires completed by English-speaking patients registered to the hidradenitis suppurativa Stuff-ThatWorks^® online community. Data collected included patient characteristics, comorbidities and treatment satisfaction. These were recoded into scalable labels using a combination of machine learning algorithm, manual coding and validation. A model of treatment effectiveness was generated. The cohort included 1,050 patients of mean ± standard deviation age 34.3 ± 10.3 years. Greater severity of hidradenitis suppurativa was associated with younger age at onset (p < 0.001) and male sex (p < 0.001). The most frequent comorbidities were depression (30%), anxiety (26.4%), and polycystic ovary syndrome (16.6%). Hurley stage I patients rated topical agents, dietary changes, turmeric, and pain relief measures more effective than tetracyclines. For Hurley stage II, adalimumab was rated most effective. For Hurley stage III, adalimumab, other biologic agents, systemic steroids, and surgical treatment were rated more effective than tetracyclines. Patients with hidradenitis suppurativa often have comorbid psychiatric and endocrine diseases. This model of treatment effectiveness provides a direct comparison of standard and complementary options.

Medical Management of Hidradenitis Suppurativa with Non-Biologic Therapy: What's New?

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a severe chronic relapsing inflammatory disorder of the hair follicle unit that can cause painful abscesses, nodules, tunnels, and tracts in intertriginous parts of the body. The disease can often result in disfigurement and adversely impact patient quality of life. The management of HS has expanded significantly over the past decade to include multiple modalities, including topical therapies, systemic therapies (non-biologics and biologics), surgical therapies, lifestyle changes, and management of comorbidities. Management can often be clinically challenging and may involve the combination of medical and surgical approaches for optimal results. The purpose of this review is to present an update on non-biologic and non-interventional modalities published in 2019-2021 in the clinical management of HS. With emerging therapies, ongoing clinical trials, and heightened awareness about HS, there is hope that new treatment options will revolutionize the management of patients suffering from HS.

Mechanism of anti-inflammatory effects of Rifampicin in an ex vivo culture system of Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease of the hair follicles leading to painful lesions, associated with increased levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Numerous guidelines recommend antibiotics like clindamycin and rifampicin in combination, as first-line systemic therapy in moderate to severe forms of inflammation. HS has been proposed to be mainly an auto-inflammatory disease associated with but not initially provoked by bacteria. Therefore, it has to be assumed that the pro-inflammatory milieu previously observed in HS skin is not solely dampened by the bacteriostatic inhibition of DNA-dependent RNA polymerase. To further clarify the mechanism of anti-inflammatory effects of rifampicin, ex vivo explants of lesional HS from 8 HS patients were treated with rifampicin, and its effect on cytokine production, immune cells as well as the expression of Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) were investigated. Analysis of cell culture medium of rifampicin treated HS explants revealed an anti-inflammatory effect of rifampicin that significantly inhibiting interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, and tumour necrosis factor (TNF) -α production. Immunohistochemistry of the rifampicin-treated explants suggested a tendency for it to reduce the expression of TLR2 while not affecting the number of immune cells.

Hidradenitis Suppurativa and Comorbid Disorder Biomarkers, Druggable Genes, New Drugs and Drug Repurposing-A Molecular Meta-Analysis

Chronic inflammation and dysregulated epithelial differentiation, especially of hair follicle keratinocytes, have been suggested as the major pathogenetic pathways of hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa (HS). On the other hand, obesity and metabolic syndrome have additionally been considered as an important risk factor. With adalimumab, a drug has already been approved and numerous other compounds are in advanced-stage clinical studies. A systematic review was conducted to detect and corroborate HS pathogenetic mechanisms at the molecular level and identify HS molecular markers. The obtained data were used to confirm studied and off-label administered drugs and to identify additional compounds for drug repurposing. A robust, strongly associated group of HS biomarkers was detected. The triad of HS pathogenesis, namely upregulated inflammation, altered epithelial differentiation and dysregulated metabolism/hormone signaling was confirmed, the molecular association of HS with certain comorbid disorders, such as inflammatory bowel disease, arthritis, type I diabetes mellitus and lipids/atherosclerosis/adipogenesis was verified and common biomarkers were identified. The molecular suitability of compounds in clinical studies was confirmed and 31 potential HS repurposing drugs, among them 10 drugs already launched for other disorders, were detected. This systematic review provides evidence for the importance of molecular studies to advance the knowledge regarding pathogenesis, future treatment and biomarker-supported clinical course follow-up in HS.

New perspectives on the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by the presence of painful nodules, abscesses, chronically draining fistulas, and scarring in apocrine gland-bearing areas of the body. The exact pathogenesis of HS is not yet well understood, but there is a consensus in considering HS a multifactorial disease with a genetic predisposition, an inflammatory dysregulation, and an influence of environmental modifying factors. Therapeutic approach of HS is challenging due to the wide clinical manifestations of the disease and the complex pathogenesis. This review describes evidence for effectiveness of current and emerging HS therapies. Topical therapy, systemic treatments, biological agents, surgery, and light therapy have been used for HS with variable results. Adalimumab is the only US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved biologic agent for moderate-to-severe HS, but new therapeutic options are being studied, targeting different specific cytokines involved in HS pathogenesis. Comparing treatment outcomes between therapies is difficult due to the lack of randomized controlled trials. Treatment strategy should be selected in concordance to disease severity and requires combination of treatments in most cases.

Efficacy of short-term intravenous clindamycin prior to oral clindamycin-rifampicin treatment in hidradenitis suppurativa: A retrospective case-series

antibiotics represent the first-line hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) treatment, although HS is not an infectious disease¹ . Prolonged antibiotic courses exhibit an anti-inflammatory effect, utilized for treating follicular/inflammatory skin diseases, e.g. acne and rosacea. Clindamycin/rifampicin or tetracyclines are usually administered for 10 to 12 weeks in moderate-to-severe HS treatment¹ , mostly based on retrospective studies using non-validated severity scoring systems.

[Need for real-world data studies on hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa treatment]

Publication of real world data on the results of treatment with (approved) drugs is important to allow for a reasonable judgement about the efficacy of a medication, especially since due to the nature of controlled clinical studies certain patient groups, who in daily clinical routine would best benefit from such new treatments, are excluded from study inclusions. In the present review, real-world data on the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) are summarized. It appears that adalimumab, as the only approved biological treatment so far, represents a cost-efficient and effective therapy. Patient education is important to increase treatment adherence and efficacy. The baseline IHS⁴ score has proven to be a meaningful predictor for recurrences during adalimumab therapy. Additional publications on real-world data including high numbers of patients with different risk factors are required to meaningly evaluate the evolving therapeutic spectrum of treatment options for HS in clinical practice.

[Systemic treatment of moderate/severe hidradenitis suppurativa]

Systemic treatment together with radical surgical excision is the most important treatment option for all severity grades of hidradenitis suppurativa. Tetracycline in mild-to-moderate forms and clindamycin in combination with rifampicin in moderate-to-severe forms are guideline-compliant first-line therapy with a good clinical response. Other antibiotics such as ertepenem or multiple combinations are recommended as last-line therapy due to a lack of data. Success rate with dapsone and retinoids, on the other hand, are insufficient-only acitretin can be recommended on the basis of the available studies, but with limited success. With the TNF-alpha blocker adalimumab, an effective and safe long-term therapy is available-further biologics are in clinical trials and could significantly expand the treatment portfolio in the future.