Facial and neck erythema associated with dupilumab treatment: A systematic review

Tonic type 2 immunity is a critical tissue checkpoint controlling autoimmunity in the skin

Immunoregulatory mechanisms established in the lymphoid organs are vital for preventing autoimmunity. However, the presence of similar mechanisms in non-lymphoid tissues remains unclear. Through transcriptomic and lipidomic analyses, we find a negative association between psoriasis and fatty acid metabolism, as well as Th2 signature. Homeostatic expression of liver X receptor (LXR) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) is essential for maintaining fatty acid metabolism and for conferring resistance to psoriasis in mice. Perturbation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 6 (STAT6) diminishes the homeostatic levels of LXR and PPARγ. Furthermore, mice lacking STAT6, interleukin 4 receptor alpha (IL-4Rα), or IL-13, but not IL-4, exhibit increased susceptibility to psoriasis. Under steady state, innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) are the primary producers of IL-13. In human skin, inhibiting tonic type 2 immunity exacerbates psoriasis-like inflammation and IL-17A, while activating LXR or PPARγ inhibits them. Hence, we propose that tonic type 2 immunity, driven by IL-13-producing ILCs, represents a crucial tissue checkpoint that represses autoimmunity and maintains lipid homeostasis in the skin.

Dupilumab in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis: A Multicentric, Long-Term, Real-World Portuguese Study

INTRODUCTION

Several clinical trials have established the efficacy and safety of dupilumab for treating atopic dermatitis (AD). However, literature remains scarce in reporting the long-term effectiveness, safety, and drug survival of dupilumab in real-world settings. This study aimed to describe the latter outcomes of dupilumab in patients with AD.

METHODS

This Portuguese, multicentric, observational, retrospective study included consecutive adult patients with AD who initiated dupilumab between January 2019 and September 2023, with a follow-up period up to 30 months. Drug discontinuation and adverse effects data were used to estimate drug survival. Clinical assessments included the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), pruritus numerical rating scale (NRS), and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI).

RESULTS

A total of 312 patients were included in the study, with 56.4% being male (median age of 30 years, range 18-83). The 30-month drug survival rate was 82.0%. During the study period, 12.5% of the sample (n = 39 patients) discontinued treatment: 7.3% due to treatment failure, 2.9% due to safety concerns, 1.3% due to complete disease control, 0.6% due to pregnancy, and 0.3% due to lack of compliance. Adverse events not leading to drug discontinuation were noted in 25.6% of the sample (n = 80). Conjunctivitis was the most frequently reported adverse event (17%), followed by facial erythema (9%). At 30 months, the mean EASI decreased significantly from 27.30 ± 11.89 at baseline to 2.92 ± 3.96 (p < 0.001), reflecting an overall improvement of 89.3%. Similarly, pruritus NRS decreased from 7.36 ± 1.90 at baseline to 1.74 ± 2.16 at month 30 (p < 0.001), improving by 76.4%, and mean DLQI changed from 18.0 ± 7.09 at baseline to 2.67 ± 3.95 at month 30 (p < 0.001), decreasing by 85.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

This study increases our current understanding of dupilumab in real-world settings, demonstrating its long-term effectiveness and safety in treating AD.

Blocking the IL-4/IL-13 Axis versus the JAK/STAT Pathway in Atopic Dermatitis: How Can We Choose?

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is an immune-mediated skin disorder with a chronic-relapsing course and a multifactorial pathogenesis. In contrast to the traditional concept of AD as solely a type 2 immune-activated disease, new findings highlight the disease as highly heterogeneous, as it can be classified into variable phenotypes based on clinical/epidemiological or molecular parameters. For many years, the only therapeutic option for moderate-severe AD was traditional immunosuppressive drugs. Recently, the area of systemic therapy of AD has significantly flourished, and many new substances are now marketed, licensed, or in the last step of clinical development. Biological agents and small molecules have enriched the therapeutic armamentarium of moderate-to-severe AD, such as dupilumab, tralokinumab, lebrikizumab (monoclonal antibodies targeting the IL-4/13 pathway), abrocitinib, upadacitinib, and baricitinib (JAK inhibitors). Indeed, the AD treatment paradigm is now split into two main approaches: targeting the IL-4/13 axis or the JAK/STAT pathway. Both approaches are valid and have strong evidence of preclinical and clinical efficacy. Therefore, the choice between the two can often be difficult and represents a major challenge for dermatologists. Indeed, several important factors must be taken into account, such as the heterogeneity of AD and its classification in phenotypes, patients' comorbidities, age, and personal preferences. The aim of our review is to provide an overview of the clinical and molecular heterogeneities of AD and to explore the factors and parameters that, in clinical practice, may help inform clinical decision-making.

Fungal Head and Neck Dermatitis: Current Understanding and Management

Head and neck dermatitis (HND) is a form of atopic dermatitis (AD) that affects the seborrheic areas of the body and causes greater quality of life detriments than other types of AD. HND can be challenging to treat since first-line topical therapies may be ineffective or intolerable for long-term use on areas affected by HND while dupilumab may cause dupilumab-associated HND (DAHND). Current evidence implicates fungi, particularly Malassezia spp., in the pathogenesis of HND. Penetration of fungal antigens through the defective AD skin barrier activates the innate and adaptive immune systems to cause cutaneous inflammation via the T helper (Th)17 and/or Th2 axes. Malassezia sensitization may distinguish HND from other forms of AD. Multiple double-blind, placebo-controlled trials have shown antifungals to benefit HND, yet the persistence of symptom relief with sustained use remains unclear. Oral antifungals appear more effective than topical antifungals but may be harmful with long-term use. DAHND may also be fungal-mediated given improvement with antifungals and evidence of an overactive immune response against Malassezia in these patients. Janus kinase inhibitors are effective for HND, including DAHND, but may cause significant side effects when administered systemically. OX40/OX40L inhibitors and tralokinumab may be promising options for HND on the horizon. Demographic and environmental factors influence the host mycobiome and should be considered in future precision-medicine approaches as microbiome composition and diversity are linked to severity of HND.

Effective treatment of corticosteroid-induced facial erythema using fractional radiofrequency microneedling

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the efficacy of Fractional Radiofrequency Microneedling (FRM) in treating corticosteroid-induced facial erythema.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted involving eight patients diagnosed as corticosteroid-induced facial erythema. Each patient underwent a single session of FRM. Evaluative measures included Clinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA), Patient's Self-Assessment (PSA), assessment of telangiectasia severity, procedure-associated pain (10-point scale), patient satisfaction (3-point scale) and secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

The study found a 75% success rate and 100% effectiveness rate in alleviating erythema symptoms. CEA and PSA scores decreased by 67.7% and 78.1%, respectively. No cases of erythema rebound were recorded during the 3-month follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

FRM demonstrated effectiveness and safety in treating facial erythema, offering promising advancement in dermatologic therapeutics.

A real-world study of dupilumab in patients with atopic dermatitis including patients with malignancy and other medical comorbidities

Background

Dupilumab is a monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (MtS-AD). Various clinical trials have established the effectiveness and safety of dupilumab for the treatment MtS-AD; however, the real-world experiences of patients treated with dupilumab with malignancy and other comorbidities are lacking.

Objective

To assess the real-life effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in the treatment of MtS-AD within Canadian adult patient population, including those with other significant comorbidities such as malignancy.

Methods

In this retrospective study, records of adult patients diagnosed with MtS-AD, with a Physician Global Assessment (PGA) score of 3 or 4, and treated with dupilumab for 52 weeks were reviewed and collected.

Results

A total of 155 adult patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) treated with dupilumab were included in the study. Asthma was the most common comorbidity. One hundred twenty-three (80%) patients received either phototherapy and/or at least 1 systemic agent (methotrexate and cyclosporine) before initiation of dupilumab. PGA score of 0 or 1 was achieved by 64% of patients at week 52. Adverse effects including injection site reactions, ocular surface disease, facial and neck redness, and arthropathy occurred in 6%, 10%, 8%, and 6% of patients, respectively. Three patients continued receiving dupilumab throughout pregnancy, all maintaining PGA score of 0 or 1 with no impact on pregnancy, delivery, or the newborn. Twelve patients with prior or active malignancy were included, with no reported negative impact on malignancy.

Conclusion

Dupilumab is an effective and safe option for patients with AD in real life, including patients with malignancy and other medical comorbidities.

Baricitinib Improvement Across Regions in Atopic Dermatitis Patients with Baseline Body Surface Area up to 40% and Severe Itch

INTRODUCTION

Patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) who are most likely to respond to the Janus kinase (JAK) 1/2 inhibitor baricitinib (BARI) are known to have an impacted body surface area (BSA) ≤ 40% and severe itch (numerical rating scale [NRS] ≥ 7], collectively termed 'BARI itch-dominant' patients. Our objective is to build on our previous work by providing a body region-specific, clinical characterization of the BARI itch-dominant patient at baseline and their response to BARI 4 mg.

METHODS

BREEZE-AD7 was a phase 3 trial in adults with moderate-to-severe AD receiving placebo or 2 mg or 4 mg BARI in combination with topical corticosteroids. Assessing only data from BARI itch-dominant patients, we summarized the baseline characteristics and conducted body region-specific analyses on Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) data in order to report the response to placebo versus BARI 4 mg within this patient subtype.

RESULTS

BARI 4 mg was highly effective across all body regions; at week 16, 75% improvement was seen in EASI scores (EASI75), and response rates with BARI 4 mg (head/neck, 58.3%; trunk, 69.2%; upper extremities, 61.5%; lower extremities, 87.5%) all exceeded those with placebo (head/neck: 37.5%; trunk, 40.6%; upper extremities, 18.8%; lower extremities, 40.6%) as well as the overall EASI75 rates of the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (BARI, 48.0%; placebo, 23.0%). At baseline, most BARI itch-dominant patients presented with involvement of all regions (mean regional BSA 22.7%-40.3%), highest in the head and neck, mean EASI region scores of 15.7-24.0, and considerably severe sign ratings (mean EASI sub-scores: 1.4-2.3, out of 3), especially for erythema.

CONCLUSION

BARI itch-dominant patients exhibit AD involvement across all body regions and considerable sign severity, especially erythema. In response to BARI 4 mg, EASI quickly improved across regions, substantially more so in this subtype than in the ITT population.

[Adverse events in biologics for severe asthma]

INTRODUCTION

Asthma is a pathology that remains severe and is inadequately controlled in 4% of patients. Identification of multiple pathophysiological mechanisms has led to the development of biomedicines, of which there are currently five available in France, with a safety profile that appears favorable but remains uncertain due to a lack of real-life experience with these new molecules.

STATE OF KNOWLEDGE

Although relatively benign, the adverse effects of biologics are diverse. Headache, joint pain, skin reactions at the injection site, fever and asthenia are commonly observed during the different treatments. Ophthalmological complications seem restricted to dupilumab, with numerous cases of keratitis and conjunctivitis in patients with atopic dermatitis. Several respiratory complications have also been observed, essentially consisting in pharyngitis and other upper respiratory infections. Hypereosinophilia may occur, mainly with dupilumab, requiring investigation of systemic repercussions or vasculitis. Allergic reactions are uncommon but require careful monitoring during initial injections.

CONCLUSION

Biologics for severe asthma are recent drugs with a favorable safety profile, but with little real-life experience, justifying increased vigilance by prescribing physicians.

Lebrikizumab Provides Rapid Clinical Responses Across All Eczema Area and Severity Index Body Regions and Clinical Signs in Adolescents and Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis

INTRODUCTION

Atopic dermatitis (AD) affects multiple areas of the body, some of which may be more refractory to treatment. We evaluated improvements in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) by body region and clinical signs for each body region in lebrikizumab-treated patients with moderate-to-severe AD.

METHODS

ADvocate 1 and ADvocate 2 compared lebrikizumab 250 mg as monotherapy every 2 weeks versus placebo for 16 weeks. Efficacy measures included EASI, which rates the extent and severity of four clinical signs (erythema, edema/papulation, excoriation, lichenification) in four body regions (head/neck, upper extremities, trunk, lower extremities). Analyses are post hoc.

RESULTS

Mean baseline EASI, body region EASI subscores, and the severity of clinical signs were consistent across both studies (EASI ranging from 16.0 to 72.0). At week 16 in both studies, patients treated with lebrikizumab showed significantly greater percent improvement in EASI across all body regions versus placebo (p ≤ 0.001), with improvements as early as week 2. In ADvocate 1, all clinical signs significantly improved across all body regions at week 16 with lebrikizumab (51.4-71.6% improvement) versus placebo (23.1-43.5%, p ≤ 0.001), with significant improvements as early as week 2 for all signs. Significant improvements for all clinical signs at week 16 were also seen in ADvocate 2 for lebrikizumab (53.5-75.6%) versus placebo (28.5-41.2%, p ≤ 0.001) and as early as week 2 for all body regions and signs except head/neck erythema and lower extremity erythema, edema/papulation, and lichenification, which showed significant improvement by week 4.

CONCLUSIONS

Lebrikizumab as monotherapy consistently and rapidly reduced the extent of involvement and severity of AD in all EASI clinical signs and body regions, including the head and neck region and clinical sign of lichenification, compared with placebo.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: ADvocate 1 (NCT04146363) and ADvocate 2 (NCT04178967).

Efficacy and safety of tralokinumab in the treatment of head and neck pattern atopic dermatitis: A multicentre study of 12 patients

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

The evaluation of the efficacy and safety of new molecules for atopic dermatitis (AD) in real clinical practice is very important to obtain information that clinical trials (EECC) lack. The pattern of AD in the head and neck (H&N) continues to be a challenge in treatment today, despite the new molecules, and real-life data on the use of tralokinumab is still missing. This is the first daily practice study of tralokinumab treatment in patients with H&N AD pattern. The objective is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tralokinumab in the short term (16 weeks) in patients with AD with H&N pattern, for the first time.

METHODS

A multicentre prospective observational study was conducted, including patients with moderate-severe AD and H&N pattern who started tralokinumab treatment in four hospitals in Andalusia. Values of severity and quality of life scales, as well as patient-reported outcomes (PROs), were collected at baseline and at Weeks 4 and 16. Safety events were also recorded.

RESULTS

Twelve patients were included. An improvement was observed in all efficacy and quality of life parameters evaluated at 16 weeks with respect to the baseline. No serious adverse events were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

In real clinical practice, tralokinumab is demonstrated to be an effective and safe treatment for patients with AD and H&N pattern at short term.

Dupilumab-associated head and neck dermatitis shows a pronounced type 22 immune signature mediated by oligoclonally expanded T cells

Dupilumab, an IL4R-blocking antibody, has shown clinical efficacy for atopic dermatitis (AD) treatment. In addition to conjunctivitis/blepharitis, the de novo appearance of head/neck dermatitis is now recognized as a distinct side effect, occurring in up to 10% of patients. Histopathological features distinct from AD suggest a drug effect, but exact underlying mechanisms remain unknown. We profiled punch biopsies from dupilumab-associated head and neck dermatitis (DAHND) by using single-cell RNA sequencing and compared data with untreated AD and healthy control skin. We show that dupilumab treatment was accompanied by normalization of IL-4/IL-13 downstream activity markers such as CCL13, CCL17, CCL18 and CCL26. By contrast, we found strong increases in type 22-associated markers (IL22, AHR) especially in oligoclonally expanded T cells, accompanied by enhanced keratinocyte activation and IL-22 receptor upregulation. Taken together, we demonstrate that dupilumab effectively dampens conventional type 2 inflammation in DAHND lesions, with concomitant hyperactivation of IL22-associated responses.

Dupilumab in real-life settings: a review of adverse events and their pathogenesis

INTRODUCTION

Dupilumab is a safe and effective biological drug that revolutionized the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD). Concerning adverse events (AEs), the most commonly reported included ocular involvement, nasopharyngitis, and injection site reactions in clinical trials. Anyway, its use in daily practice is revealing novel dupilumab-induced manifestations.

AREAS COVERED

Relevant English literature (real-life studies, case series, reviews, and meta-analyses) regarding real-life adverse events induced by dupilumab were searched for up to 10 June 2023.

EXPERT OPINION

Dupilumab is an effective treatment for AD, showing favorable safety profile since no routine laboratory monitoring is recommended. However, several cutaneous and extracutaneous AEs have been reported in real-life setting expanding the pool emerged from clinical trials. In detail, dupilumab may determine de-novo onset or exacerbation of preexisting conditions, whose pathogenesis is still unclear and seems to involve Th1/Th2 and Th2/Th17 immune-response imbalance. Also, the heterogeneity and the variable onset time of AEs with respect to dupilumab initiation warrant a thorough patients' history collection and strict short- and long-term monitoring. Finally, the most appropriate management of patients with AEs related to dupilumab should take into consideration efficacy for AD as well as severity and nature of the AE, available treatment and patients' preferences.

Targeted Systemic Therapies for Adults with Atopic Dermatitis: Selecting from Biologics and JAK Inhibitors

Therapeutic options for people with moderate or severe atopic dermatitis refractory to topical therapy have rapidly expanded in recent years. These new targeted immunomodulatory agents-biologics and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors-have each demonstrated high levels of efficacy and acceptable safety in mostly placebo-controlled clinical trials for atopic dermatitis, but there is no universally applicable algorithm to help choose between them for a given patient. Hence, patients and physicians should utilize shared decision making, discussing efficacy, safety, mode of delivery, monitoring, costs, speed of onset, and other factors to reach individualized treatment decisions. In this review, we try to aid shared decision making by summarizing the efficacy, safety, and monitoring of biologics and oral JAK inhibitors for adults with atopic dermatitis. Network meta-analyses suggest that higher doses of abrocitinib and upadacitinib are more effective than biologics. They also show that, among biologics, dupilumab is likely more effective than tralokinumab and lebrikizumab. Biologics are generally considered safer than JAK inhibitors, although concerns about JAK inhibitors are mainly extrapolated from older generation JAK inhibitors used in higher-risk populations. We also outline evidence and considerations for choosing and using systemic immunomodulatory treatments for special populations including pregnant individuals, those with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B and C, end stage kidney disease, and older adults.

Methotrexate therapy for adult and paediatric moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis of data from daily practice

Of the 15 eligible studies identified via electronic searches in MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL in November 2022 for methotrexate therapy of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, 12 were non-randomized controlled trial (non-RCT) studies with data from 437 patients (235 adults and 202 children). The response rates for short-term therapy were 77% [95% CI 55-99] (four studies; adults) - comparable to 81% [54-100] of RCTs (two studies; adults) (p = 0.63) - and 61% [43-79] (two studies; children), and for medium/long-term therapy were 88.9% [74.3-100.0] (four studies; adults) and 77.7% [61.5-94.0] (three studies; children). Children had a markedly lower rate of treatment discontinuation due to side effects [2.0% (five studies; children) vs. 14.9% (six studies; adults)], but were more likely to experience gastrointestinal disorders {relative risk (RR) 2.0 [1.44-2.71]}, fatigue (RR 2.3 [1.35-3.72]), headache (RR 2.8 [1.23-5.61]), and infections (RR 2.9 [2.18-3.58]). Other adverse events (children vs. adults) included hepatic disorders (32/176 vs. 35/305) and blood and lymphatic system/bone marrow disorders (25/148 vs. 19/184). Four serious adverse events were reported (children). Evidence from daily practice was limited by bias in the selection of participants in the study.

Residual facial erythema in atopic dermatitis patients treated with dupilumab stratified by machine learning

BACKGROUND

Persistent facial erythema represents a significant complication in atopic dermatitis (AD) patients undergoing treatment with dupilumab. Stratifying patients based on the erythema course is crucial for elucidating heterogeneous phenotypes and facilitating advanced drug efficacy predictions.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to identify factors associated with facial erythema severity in dupilumab-treated AD patients and to establish a prediction model for drug response based on the identified factors.

METHODS

Data from a retrospective study conducted between July 2018 and July 2021 were collected and analysed. Patients were categorized into three groups via hierarchical clustering based on the course of facial erythema: early remission, low remission and persistent residual. LightGBM, a supervised gradient boosting decision tree algorithm, was employed to discern group differences and construct a prediction model. The model incorporated patient demographic and clinical profiles, including pre- and post-treatment examinations. The model's performance was evaluated using accuracy and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

RESULTS

The binary classification model demonstrated an accuracy of 89.10% and an AUC of 0.862 when distinguishing between early remission and persistent residual patients. The eight prominent factors associated with facial erythema severity included age, sex, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), immunoglobulin E (IgE), eosinophil count, white blood cell count, Alnus allergy and cedar allergy.

CONCLUSIONS

This study has two main significances: first, three clusters were identified through unsupervised learning; second, a classification model was constructed that proved more accurate than random prediction. The stratification and identification of crucial factors associated with residual facial erythema in dupilumab-treated AD patients lay the foundation for AI-powered prognostic models. This groundwork provides a substantial basis for enhancing future medical AI support in AD treatment selection, potentially improving personalized treatment approaches and outcomes.

Dupilumab Alters Both the Bacterial and Fungal Skin Microbiomes of Patients with Atopic Dermatitis

The skin microbiome at lesion sites in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) is characterized by dysbiosis. Although the administration of dupilumab, an IL-4Rα inhibitor, improves dysbiosis in the bacterial microbiome, information regarding the fungal microbiome remains limited. This study administered dupilumab to 30 patients with moderate-to-severe AD and analyzed changes in both fungal and bacterial skin microbiomes over a 12-week period. Malassezia restricta and M. globosa dominated the fungal microbiome, whereas non-Malassezia yeast species increased in abundance, leading to greater microbial diversity. A qPCR analysis revealed a decrease in Malassezia colonization following administration, with a higher reduction rate observed where the pretreatment degree of colonization was higher. A correlation was found between the group classified by the Eczema Area and Severity Index, the group categorized by the concentration of Thymus and activation-regulated chemokine, and the degree of skin colonization by Malassezia. Furthermore, an analysis of the bacterial microbiome also confirmed a decrease in the degree of skin colonization by the exacerbating factor Staphylococcus aureus and an increase in the microbial diversity of the bacterial microbiome. Our study is the first to show that dupilumab changes the community structure of the bacterial microbiome and affects the fungal microbiome in patients with AD.

Drug Survival of Upadacitinib and Predicting Factors of Discontinuation in Adult Patients Affected by Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: An Italian Multicenter Analysis

Background: Limited real-world data are available on upadacitinib drug survival in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD). Objectives: To investigate upadacitinib drug survival, and the reasons and predictors of drug discontinuation in AD patients. Methods: All consecutive patients aged 18-75 years, affected by moderate-to-severe AD, and treated with upadacitinib for more than 1 month at dermatological clinics were included during November 2020-August 2023. Upadacitinib survival was investigated through Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the predictors through multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results: Overall, 325 adult AD patients (mean (SD) age, 38.6(15.6) years) had a 1-year and 1.5-year upadacitinib drug survival of 91.5% and 80.2%, respectively. The main reasons for drug discontinuation (25/325, 7.7%) were adverse events (4.9%), including cutaneous or infectious diseases (1.5%), such as acne and herpes zoster; blood test changes (1.2%), including hypercholesterolemia, creatine phosphokinase or liver enzyme elevation, and lymphopenia; urinary or respiratory infections (0.9%); deep venous thrombosis (0.3%); malignancies (0.3%); loss of consciousness (0.3%); and arthralgias (0.3%); followed by ineffectiveness (0.6%). No specific characteristic was significantly associated with an increased risk of upadacitinib discontinuation. Conclusions: Our findings show that upadacitinib was effective in moderate-to-severe AD after more than 1 year of continuous treatment but point to the need for clinical and laboratory monitoring of patients.

Clinical trials of antibody drugs in the treatments of atopic dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is one of the most common, relapsing, chronic inflammatory skin disease, being regarded as a global health issue. Recent studies have shown that Th2 cell-mediated type 2 immunity plays a central role in AD. The type 2 inflammatory cytokines such as IL-4, IL-13, IL-22, IL-31, IL-17 and IL-5 mediate the pathogenesis of AD. A variety of antibody drugs targeting these cytokines have been developed to treat AD in clinics. Notably, several antibody drugs have exhibited high efficacy in treating atopic dermatitis in previous studies, demonstrating that they could be therapeutic methods for AD patients. Herein, we reviewed the clinical trials of antibody drugs in the treatment of AD, which provides a useful guideline for clinicians to treat patients with AD in clinics.

Dupilumab Treatment Leads to Rapid and Consistent Improvement of Atopic Dermatitis in All Anatomical Regions in Patients Aged 6 Months to 5 Years

INTRODUCTION

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is heterogeneous in distribution pattern and clinical features. This analysis assessed the effect of dupilumab on the extent and severity of AD across various signs (erythema, edema/papulation, excoriation, lichenification) in different anatomical regions (head and neck, trunk, upper extremities, lower extremities) in patients aged 6 months to 5 years.

METHODS

In LIBERTY AD PRESCHOOL, a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III clinical trial, children aged 6 months to 5 years with moderate-to-severe AD were randomized 1:1 to subcutaneous dupilumab or placebo with concomitant low-potency topical corticosteroids (TCS) every 4 weeks for 16 weeks. Changes in AD signs across anatomical regions were assessed using unweighted Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) body region scores.

RESULTS

Overall, 162 patients were randomized to dupilumab (n = 83) or placebo (n = 79). A significant improvement in least squares mean EASI area score was seen by week 2 in all four anatomical regions (P < 0.0001 for dupilumab vs. placebo) and sustained throughout treatment. Least squares mean EASI sign scores in erythema, excoriations, and infiltration/papulation showed significant improvement by week 2 in all regions (P < 0.001), while lichenification showed significant improvement in all regions by week 4 (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Dupilumab use with concomitant low-potency TCS treatment resulted in rapid and consistent improvement in AD signs in all anatomical regions, in patients aged 6 months to 5 years with moderate-to-severe AD.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03346434 Part B.

Analyses of Dupilumab-Related Ocular Adverse Drug Reactions Using the WHO's VigiBase

INTRODUCTION

Dupilumab is a drug that inhibits the action of interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13 and is a potent therapeutic drug for allergic diseases such as atopic dermatitis. Although its use has been associated with significant ocular adverse drug reactions (ADRs), the IL-4 and IL-13 inhibition may also have favorable therapeutic effects. The aim of this study was to determine the disease spectrum in which the use of dupilumab may have been associated with an increase or decrease of ocular ADRs.

METHODS

We searched the World Health Organization's VigiBase for ADRs associated with the use of dupilumab for data up to 12 June 2022. The number of all ADRs that were retrieved was compared with the number of ocular ADRs associated with the use of dupilumab. Disproportionate reporting was assessed by calculating the information component (IC) values and odds ratios.

RESULTS

Since the introduction of dupilumab, 100,267 ADRs have been reported. Of all the ADRs associated with dupilumab, 28,522 ADRs were ocular complications, and it ranked fourth in the ocular complications by organ level. By assessments of the IC for age ≤ 44 years, the most significantly associated ADRs were dry eye followed by blepharitis including eyelid crusting and dryness and conjunctivitis. Crusting and dryness of the eyelids were the most significant ADRs for all age groups. Other ocular ADRs reported include meibomian gland dysfunction, keratitis, glaucoma, and retinal disorders. In contrast, periorbital edema, neuro-ophthalmic disorders, optic neuritis, and macular edema were significantly reduced by the use of dupilumab.

CONCLUSIONS

Dupilumab-related ADRs included an increase or decrease of various ocular disorders. The results indicate that dupilumab also has potential therapeutic effects.

Pustular Psoriasis in a Patient Treated with Dupilumab for Atopic Dermatitis: A Case Report

Psoriasis and atopic dermatitis are relatively common in clinical practice, but it is rare for the two diseases to co-occur in the same patient. Dupilumab, an anti-IL-4/IL-13 monoclonal antibody, has been approved for treating moderate to severe AD. In addition to its therapeutic effects, dupilumab may induce new cutaneous adverse reactions. We report a rare case of pustular psoriasis induced during the treatment of atopic dermatitis with dupilumab. This case demonstrates the need for caution while treating patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis and staying vigilant for the emergence of new symptoms, especially with biological agents.

Age of onset defines two distinct profiles of atopic dermatitis in adults

BACKGROUND

The incidence of adult-onset atopic dermatitis (AOAD) is increasing. However, the unique characteristics of AOAD compared to pediatric-onset AD persisting into adulthood (POAD) are underexplored, hampering the development of targeted-therapeutics for this growing population. We thus assessed the profile of AOAD in skin and blood compared to that of POAD.

METHODS

We collected skin biopsies and blood from adults with AOAD, POAD, and healthy controls (n = 15 in each group). Skin samples were analyzed by RNA sequencing, qRT-PCR, and immunohistochemistry, and Olink Proseek multiplex assay was used to identify the serum proteomic profile.

RESULTS

Compared to healthy controls, both AOAD and POAD showed cutaneous immune and barrier dysregulations with a shared Th2/Th22 hyperactivation. Overall, POAD showed greater inflammation in lesional skin, with more prominent expression of Th2/Th17/Th22 markers (CCL17/22, S100A8/9, IL-36A, PI3/Elafin, DEFB4) in POAD compared to AOAD (p-value < .05). In contrast, higher Th1-(IFN-γ, IL-2, IL-15, CCL5) upregulation and Th1-skewing were seen in AOAD. The epidermal barrier was also more compromised in POAD, with greater epidermal hyperplasia and lower expression of markers related to terminal differentiation, lipids, and cell adhesion. In parallel with increased rates of cardiovascular comorbidities, AOAD demonstrated many more significantly dysregulated proteins in serum (n = 148) compared to POAD (n = 86), including pro-inflammatory and cardiovascular-risk markers. Th1-related products showed significant correlations between their skin and blood expressions only in AOAD subjects.

CONCLUSION

Age-of-onset delineates two distinct endophenotypes in adult AD potentially suggesting the need for broader (beyond Th2) therapeutic targeting in AOAD.

Patch Testing in Patients With Severe Atopic Dermatitis Treated With Dupilumab: A Multicentric Approach in Spain

Background: Persistent localized dermatitis (PLD) or eczema flare-ups (EF) may occur in atopic dermatitis (AD) patients treated with dupilumab. They may reflect concomitant allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) exposed by the inhibition of the Th2 pathway by dupilumab in some cases. Objective: To evaluate the prevalence and etiology of these events and the impact of dupilumab on patch test outcome. Methods: We performed patch tests on 54 AD patients treated with dupilumab and evaluated the prevalence and final diagnosis of EF and PLD as well as the patch test results. Results: The patch test results were positive in 20/54 (37.0%). 21/54 patients (38.9%) had PLD and 12/54 (22.2%) had EF. Ten of 54 (18.5%) had both conditions and 11/54 (20.4%) had neither PLD nor EF. 64.5% of PLD involved the face. 83.9% patients with PLD and 90.9% patients with EF were diagnosed with inadequately controlled AD. 9.7% patients with PLD and 4.5% patients with EF were finally diagnosed with ACD. Nine of 21 (42.9%) patients patch tested twice were positive either before and/or during dupilumab. Patch tests results changed over time in all of them. Conclusions: Patch testing assisted us to exclude ACD as the cause of PLD/EF in AD patients treated with dupilumab. Most PLD and EF were, however, diagnosed as poorly controlled AD. Dupilumab appeared to impact the patch test outcomes.

Facial redness in Japanese adolescents with atopic dermatitis treated with dupilumab: A case series

This case series study is the first report of Japanese adolescents who experienced dupilumab facial redness after starting dupilumab treatment for refractory atopic dermatitis. In every case, dupilumab facial redness subsided without discontinuation of dupilumab within 3 months after onset.

Biologic Versus Small Molecule Therapy for Treating Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Clinical Considerations

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval of dupilumab for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis shifted the paradigm from use of broad, systemic immunosuppressants to a safer, targeted treatment and led to the emergence of newer interleukin (IL)-4/IL-13 directed biologics and small molecule therapies, namely Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors (JAKi). Tralokinumab and emerging (not yet approved) lebrikizumab, which both target IL-13, are alternative biologics to dupilumab. The emerging anti-IL-31 receptor nemolizumab is likely to be used second-line to other biologics, primarily for pruritus. Three JAKi are currently in use for treating atopic dermatitis, 2 of which, abrocitinib and upadacitinib, are U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved. This review provides an in-depth, practical discussion on use of these biologics and JAKi that are approved or have completed phase 3 clinical trials in pediatric patients and adults, comparing the groups of medications based on available efficacy and safety data.

Dupilumab-associated cutaneous adverse events among adult patients with atopic dermatitis: A retrospective study

Dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody inhibiting interleukin (IL) 4 and IL-13, is approved for the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in children aged ≥6 years, adolescents, and adults. Both clinical trials and real-life data demonstrate its efficacy and safety. However, some cutaneous adverse events (cAEs) have been observed during real-world experiences. The authors' aim was to analyze the spectrum of cAEs in patients receiving dupilumab for the treatment of AD in a real-world setting. A retrospective review of electronic medical records was conducted for 916 patients (475 males and 541 females; mean age, 50.23 ± 19.66 years [range, 18-91 years]) who had received dupilumab for a minimum of 1 month for the treatment of AD from December 2018 to November 2022 at the Department of Dermatology of University Federico II of Naples (Italy). The mean duration of dupilumab treatment was 27.31 ± 21.26 months. A total of 148 of 916 (16.15%) (90 males; mean age, 50.91 ± 15.34 years) patients reported other cAEs apart of AD flare; namely, facial redness (82 of 916; 8.95%), psoriasis (39 of 916; 4.25%), alopecia areata (11 of 916; 1.2%), skin peeling (11 of 916; 1.2%), parapsoriasis (three of 916; 0.32%), and vitiligo (two of 916; 0.21%). Thirty-one of 916 (3.38%) patients discontinued dupilumab because of cAEs (18 of 916; 1.96%) for facial redness, 10 of 916 (1.09%) for psoriasis, and three of 916 (0.32%) for parapsoriasis. In our population, most of the cAEs were mild and did not require discontinuation of dupilumab. These findings would enable dermatologists understand the cutaneous side effects of dupilumab better, resulting in improved treatment plan decisions in clinical practice.

Efficacy and safety of baricitinib treatment for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis in real-world practice in Japan

The authors evaluated the efficacy and safety of baricitinib, a Janus kinase 1/2 inhibitor, for atopic dermatitis (AD) in real-world practice. From August 2021 to September 2022, 36 patients aged ≥15 years with moderate to severe AD were treated with oral baricitinib 4 mg/day plus topical corticosteroids. Baricitinib improved clinical indexes; the percent reduction at weeks 4 and 12 was a median of 69.19% and 69.98% for the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), 84.52% and 76.33% for the Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool, and 76.39% and 64.58% for Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Score, respectively. The achievement rate of EASI 75 was 38.89% and 33.33% at weeks 4 and 12, respectively. The percent reduction of EASI in the head and neck, upper limbs, lower limbs, and trunk was 56.9%, 68.3%, 80.7%, and 62.5% at week 12, respectively, with a significant difference between the head and neck versus the lower limbs. Baricitinib decreased thymus and activation-regulated chemokine, lactate dehydrogenase, and total eosinophil count at week 4. Baseline EASI of the head and neck negatively correlated with percent reduction of EASI at week 4, while baseline EASI of the lower limbs positively correlated with percent reduction of EASI at week 12. Treatment-emergent adverse events included elevation of creatine phosphokinase (11.1%), herpes labialis (5.6%), furuncle (8.3%), and exacerbation of AD (1%), without serious treatment-emergent adverse events. In this real-world study, baricitinib was well tolerated for patients with AD and achieved therapeutic effects comparable to those in clinical trials. High baseline EASI of the lower limbs might predict good treatment response at week 12, while high baseline EASI of the head and neck might predict poor treatment response at week 4 in baricitinib treatment for AD.

Case report: Dupilumab leads to an increased chance of head and neck Staphylococcus aureus infection in atopic dermatitis patients

Dupilumab was the first biological medication licensed to treat atopic dermatitis (AD), and it has shown remarkable effectiveness and safety in the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. There are limited drug-related adverse events associated with dupilumab in atopic dermatitis (AD) treatment. Here, we present two cases of local Staphylococcus aureus infection during the treatment of atopic dermatitis with dupilumab.

Upadacitinib-induced paradoxical face and scalp dermatitis: A case report of a novel sequela

Atopic dermatitis is a chronic, pruritic inflammatory cutaneous condition that can carry significant morbidity. Severe or recalcitrant atopic dermatitis is often treated with immunosuppressants, biologics, or immune-modulating small molecule therapies. The Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription pathway is highly implicated in atopic dermatitis pathogenesis, and agents that inhibit Janus kinase signalling are new to the atopic dermatitis landscape. Upadacitinib is a JAK1 inhibitor that has a good safety and efficacy profile and is increasingly being prescribed for atopic dermatitis. We report a case of a 35-year-old male with extensive atopic dermatitis that initially improved significantly on upadacitinib, then after 6 months developed a severe crusted dermatitic eruption on the head favouring a seborrheic distribution. While the pathogenesis of this paradoxical reaction is unclear, this phenomenon may involve a shift to a more Th1/Th17-mediated immune response.

Impact of a Decade of Research Into Atopic Dermatitis

The last decade has seen an unprecedented pace of change, particularly of clinical research in atopic dermatitis (AD). This review summarizes some key discoveries. Over the last 10 years, nearly half of all studies investigated the efficacy and safety of novel therapeutic agents, particularly biologics and small molecules. Clear demonstration of benefit in clinical trials with no significant safety concerns provided strong evidence leading to subsequent Food and Drug Administration approval and routine use of the anti-IL-4 receptor alpha antagonist dupilumab in patients 6 months and older, the selective Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) inhibitors upadacitinib for patients 12 years and older and abrocitinib, the IL-13 antagonist tralokinumab, and the JAK1/2 inhibitor baricitinib for adults 18 years and older. Several other drugs are in the pipeline. Other areas under the spotlight have been trials of skin moisturizers and probiotics in the prevention of AD, investigating the role of filaggrin and skin barrier function and the role of skin and gut microbiome, with Staphylococcus aureus second immunoglobulin-binding protein having been found to uniquely trigger allergic skin responses in AD. Skin microbiome, epidermal metabolites/structural components, and local inflammatory biomarkers are now commonly assessed using genomic and proteomic analysis of tape strips rather than more invasive biopsy to identify factors such as C-C motif chemokine ligand-17 that correlate with disease severity and response to therapy. Overall, the last decade has ushered in a new and exciting era in our understanding, diagnosis, and treatment of this common allergic skin disease.

Dupilumab: Advances in the off-label usage of IL4/IL13 antagonist in dermatoses

Type 2 immune response refers to a complicated series of immune responses characterized by Th2 polarization and Th2 cytokines secretion. The IgE secretion, airway hypersensitivity, and effector cell recruitment (eosinophils, mast cells, basophils) in skin lesion and peripheral blood stream could be upregulated during the activation of type 2 immune response. Th1/Th2 ratio, also referred as Th1/Th2 balance, represent the T lymphocytes immune pattern to a certain degree: Th1-dominated responses are often involved in intracellular infections (e.g., mycobacterium tuberculosis) and autoimmune diseases (e.g., Graves' disease) while Th2-dominated responses are involved in allergic conditions (e.g., atopic dermatitis, eczema), IgE mediated diseases (e.g., urticaria), and fibrotic dermatoses (e.g., keloids). Dupilumab, as one of the most widely applied Th2 cytokine inhibitors, could block the bioactivity of IL-14/IL-13 via competitively binding to the common IL-4Rα subunit shared by IL-4 and IL-13 receptors. In addition to the direct inhibition of type 2 response, dupilumab is also effective in autoimmune and some infectious skin diseases through indirect regulation of type 1 immune response. The pathological mechanism of Th2 responses and advanced clinical application of dupilumab in skin diseases will be summarized and discussed in the review.

Current and Emerging Therapies in Pediatric Atopic Dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the most common inflammatory skin disease seen in children. It is a heterogeneous disorder, with a variety of associated manifestations and symptoms. Cases may range from mild to severe. As a result, a spectrum of prescription and nonprescription therapies may be utilized when managing this condition. This article provides an extensive overview of these therapies, with equal consideration provided to current, emerging, and alternative options used in the pediatric population.

Photosensitivity is an important cause of refractory facial erythema in atopic dermatitis: A retrospective study of 82 Chinese patients

BACKGROUND

Ultraviolet radiation can aggravate facial erythema in atopic dermatitis (AD) patients.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the photobiological testing results of Chinese AD patients with refractory facial erythema.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 82 AD patients with refractory facial erythema who visited our department during 2004-2021. All of them completed phototesting and photopatch testing.

RESULTS

82 patients were enrolled in the study, and 53 (64.6%) were between 18 and 30 years old. 51.2% (42/82) had positive phototesting results and were considered photosensitive AD (PhAD) patients. One-third of them were both allergic to ultraviolet A and ultraviolet B. 65.9% (54/82) suffered from photoallergic contact dermatitis. Chlorpromazine (50.7%), potassium dichromate (13.2%), and thimerosal (11.8%) were the top three common photoallergens. Overall, 86.3% of AD patients with refractory facial erythema had direct photoallergy or photocontact allergy. PhAD patients had fewer allergic comorbidities than the other group (p = .007). More non-PhAD patients (55.0%) suffered from AD at 2-14 years old (p = .015).

CONCLUSIONS

Photosensitivity contributes a lot to the facial lesions of AD patients, especially in their 20s. 86.3% of these patients had direct photoallergy or photocontact allergy. Therefore, AD patients with facial erythema should undergo phototesting and photopatch testing routinely.

Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma following dupilumab use: a systematic review

In recent years, studies have associated dupilumab with unmasking or progression of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). The objective of this study was to synthesize reported cases of CTCL in the setting of dupilumab use. Two independent reviewers conducted a systematic review using PubMed and Embase databases. Twelve studies, of 27 total patients, were included. Dupilumab-associated CTCL was diagnosed on average 7.8 months following dupilumab initiation. Of reports that included body surface area (BSA), 100% had a BSA >50% prior to diagnosis, and the majority of patients were diagnosed at later stages of disease: stage III (4/18) or IV (6/18). Post-dupilumab biopsies revealed a greater density of cells and a predominant lichenoid pattern, compared to various histologic patterns and less cell density in pre-dupilumab biopsies. The majority of TCR gene rearrangement studies were equivocal (20%) or negative (60%), posing a potential diagnostic pitfall. Limitations included lack of standardized data collection and reporting and a small number of studies. We suggest that earlier biopsies, three to four months after initiation of dupilumab, may be helpful for earlier recognition of CTCL in patients who are not improving, progressing, or have morphologic changes on dupilumab.

Burning and Scaling Probably Associated with Dupilumab Therapy: A Case Report

Case Report

We present the case of a 51-year-old male who experienced temporary desquamation and recurrent burning sensation in primary skin lesions after the injection of dupilumab. The scaling lasted for 1 week and subsided, while the burning became aggravated with each injection of dupilumab, which gradually subsides after 8 weeks, and there was no recurrence since then.

Conclusion

Dupilumab is an emerging and efficacious biologics medication for AD. The burning sensation and scaling we report may be the adverse events of dupilumab. Rare adverse reactions to biologics deserve the attention of physicians.

Effectiveness and Safety of Upadacitinib in the Treatment of Moderate-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Multicentric, Prospective, Real-World, Cohort Study

Background

The efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in atopic dermatitis (AD) have been defined in clinical trials, but no real-world data are currently available. We aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of upadacitinib in a real-world AD patient cohort that mostly included patients who failed the available systemic therapies, including dupilumab.

Methods

Prospective cohort study collecting data on upadacitinib-treated AD adult patients completing at least 16 weeks of therapy.

Results

Forty-three patients showed rapid and marked response to upadacitinib with significant reduction of all disease severity scores since the first follow-up visit. At week 16, Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) 75, EASI 90, and EASI 100 response was observed in 97.5%, 82.1%, and 69.2% of patients, respectively. EASI 90 response reflected the achievement of a clear or almost clear condition (POEM 0-2), self-evaluated by 79.5% of patients. Patients’ quality of life improved as suggested by the achievement of DLQI 0/1 by 38.5% of patients at week 4, and by 76.9% at week 16.

Conclusion

Elevated effectiveness and favorable safety of upadacitinib were confirmed in patients unresponsive to dupilumab, who were not included in upadacitinib trials.

Dupilumab-Associated Head and Neck Dermatitis With Ocular Involvement in a Ten-Year-Old With Atopic Dermatitis: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Facial and neck erythema secondary to dupilumab use is a side effect not reported in clinical trials; however, it has been reported aftermarket initially in adults and most recently in adolescents. We report the youngest known case of head and neck dermatitis (HND) secondary to Malassezia furfur accompanied by ocular involvement. Treatment with oral fluconazole 150 mg weekly was initiated with subsequent cutaneous improvement. Additionally, his conjunctivitis improved with fluorometholone 0.1% eye drops. As dupilumab becomes more accessible to children, understanding the pathophysiology of HND, characterizing the clinical course, and developing diagnostic and treatment guidelines for this age group will be imperative.

Facial Erythema in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis Treated with Dupilumab- A Descriptive Study of Morphology and Etiology

BACKGROUND

The development of dermatitis on face and neck, which was not described in phase 3 clinical trials, has been reported in the literature in patients treated with dupilumab. Little is known regarding the causes or defining features of the facial dermatitis.

OBJECTIVES

We conducted surveys of consecutive patients with AD on dupilumab to describe its clinical features, morphology, and etiology.

METHODS

A multicenter prospective cohort study was conducted from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020. A total of 162 patients under dupilumab treatment were asked to complete a questionnaire and patients were evaluated by dermatologists.

RESULTS

Out of all 162 patients, 137 (84.6%) patients reported pre-existing facial dermatitis prior to dupilumab therapy. 121 (88.3%) patients with pre-existing facial dermatitis reported improvement of their facial dermatitis with dupilumab therapy, 9 (6.6%) patients reported no change after the treatment, and 7 (4.3%) patients of them got worse after the treatment (exacerbation group). Out of 25 patients who reported no pre-existing active facial dermatitis, 6 (24%) patients reported new-onset facial erythema after the starting dupilumab therapy (new-onset group). A large proportion of the patients in both the exacerbation (86%) and new-onset groups (67%) had a history of facial TCS use. Both groups showed similar clinical manifestations and distribution with few differences.

CONCLUSIONS

The vast majority of patients treated with dupilumab in academic institutions from Korea and U.S. experienced improvement in their facial dermatitis with dupilumab therapy. A small proportion of patients had new onset and exacerbation. Although the mechanisms of this adverse event remains unclear, steroid withdrawal should be considered as a diagnosis of the erythema in some patients.

Dupilumab-Associated Adverse Events During Treatment of Allergic Diseases

Among the new biological therapies for atopic diseases, dupilumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody directed against IL-4Rα, the common chain of interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 receptors. Dupilumab showed clinical improvements in patients with atopic dermatitis, asthma, and chronic rhinosinusitis and is currently under development for other indications. While dupilumab is considered to be well tolerated, a number of recent publications have reported various adverse events. This review aims to summarize the current knowledge about these adverse events, which may help clinicians to improve the follow-up of patients on dupilumab. Injection-site reactions are the most common reported adverse event. However, dupilumab has also been shown to cause ophthalmic complications (e.g., dry eyes, conjunctivitis, blepharitis, keratitis, and ocular pruritus), head and neck dermatitis, onset of psoriatic lesions, progression of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma exacerbation, alopecia areata, hypereosinophilia, and arthritis. Most are managed during dupilumab treatment continuation, but some (e.g., severe conjunctivitis) may result in a discontinuation of treatment. Their molecular origin is unclear and requires further investigations. Among other hypothesis, it has been suggested that T helper (Th)2-mediated pathway inhibition may worsen Th1/Th17-dependent immune responses. An ophthalmological examination for the presence of potential predictive indicators of ophthalmic adverse events is recommended before initiation of dupilumab therapy.

[Modern systemic therapies for atopic dermatitis : Which factors determine the choice of therapy?]

For the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD), two groups of modern systemic therapies with a total of five drugs are currently approved in Germany: biologics (dupilumab, tralokinumab) and "small molecules" (abrocitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib). The growing armamentarium of therapy options, especially with more than one drug per substance group, makes it challenging for practitioners to select the appropriate treatment for the individual patient. In this review article, the preconditions and requirements of each drug group as well as the corresponding substances are presented comparatively. On the one hand, direct therapeutic effects on the severity of the disease are considered and, on the other hand, the spectrum of potential adverse drug reactions are discussed. In particular, short- and long-term effects, the safety profile and the patient's concomitant diseases represent key factors for shared decision-making with regard to select the optimum personalized therapy option.

Phase 3 Efficacy and Safety of Abrocitinib in Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis After Switching from Dupilumab (JADE EXTEND)

BACKGROUND

Abrocitinib efficacy by prior dupilumab response status in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) has not previously been assessed in phase 3 studies.

OBJECTIVE

Examine efficacy and safety of abrocitinib among patients who received prior dupilumab.

METHODS

Patients with moderate-to-severe AD received abrocitinib 200 mg or 100 mg once-daily in JADE EXTEND (phase 3 extension) after dupilumab in double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 JADE COMPARE.

RESULTS

Among prior dupilumab responders, ≥75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75) was achieved in 93.5% and 90.2% of patients who received 12 weeks of abrocitinib 200 mg and 100 mg, respectively; ≥4-point improvement in Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS4) was achieved in 89.7% and 81.6%, respectively. Among prior dupilumab nonresponders, EASI-75 was achieved with abrocitinib 200 mg and 100 mg in 80.0% and 67.7% and PP-NRS4 in 77.3% and 37.8%, respectively. Most common adverse events among abrocitinib-treated patients were nasopharyngitis, nausea, acne, and headache. Conjunctivitis occurred less frequently with abrocitinib in comparison to prior dupilumab.

LIMITATIONS

Short-term, 12-week analysis; no placebo arm.

CONCLUSION

Efficacy and safety profile of abrocitinib in JADE EXTEND supports the role of abrocitinib as a treatment for patients with moderate-to-severe AD, regardless of prior dupilumab response status.