Acute decompensated heart failure: the shrinking role of inotropic therapy

Cost to Save a Life in Heart Failure: Health Disparity Costs Lives

Objective

The purpose of this paper is to assign a dollar value to life-saving medication, surgical procedures, and medical devices. The knowledge of the wide variation in the cost of drugs, surgery, and devices allows providers and patients to choose higher-valued therapies. Cost is a significant barrier to health. The current reimbursement system is complicated, representing a significant barrier to saving lives by promoting health disparity.

Background

The cost analysis of heart failure therapies is an important tool in the education of physicians, patients, and vendors of the intervention. The analysis demonstrates disparities between heart failure therapies. The cost to save a single life is calculated from annualized absolute mortality risk reduction, trial length, and estimated 10-year costs. The method allows comparisons of drugs, devices, and surgery.

Methods

The 10-year cost of drugs is 120 months times the cost of a drug/month as listed by the website GoodRX.com. The 10-year cost of surgery or device therapy was determined from a cost analysis found by a Google search of the literature. When wide ranges were reported, the mean value was selected.

1/absolute mortality risk reduction X 100 is the number needed to treat to save a life annualized for the mean length of the study. The cost to save a life can then be computed by the following formula:

Cost/life saved = (10-year cost/annualized absolute mortality risk reduction) X (100)

Results

Beta-blockers and spironolactone had the lowest cost per life saved at $13,333 and $21,818, respectively. Defibrillators are the most expensive at $6,417,856. Valsartan/sacubitril has a cost of $1,127,733. Dapagliflozin, the newest class of heart failure drug, costs $4,853,200. 

Conclusions

Calculating the cost to save a life gives insight into the value of therapies and demonstrates disparities. It is a means of comparing drugs and devices. New drug therapies are costly, not affordable, and serve as a barrier to the successful treatment of heart failure.

Why We Fail at Heart Failure: Lymphatic Insufficiency Is Disregarded

Is the definition of heart failure too narrow, not allowing research into compensatory mechanisms, comorbidities, right heart function, and lymphatic function?

A review of the absolute mortality of heart failure drugs and devices suggests a modest improvement in outcomes. Absolute mortality from common comorbidities, including renal insufficiency, arrhythmia, conduction deficits, pulmonary hypertension, anemia, obstructive sleep apnea, infection, inflammation, edema, ischemic heart disease, and diabetes II, is significant. The lymphatic function is involved in short, intermediate, and long-term compensation for a failing heart and plays a role in most of the comorbidities.

A better definition of heart failure is: Heart failure is a complex clinical syndrome that results from any structural or functional impairment of right or left ventricular filling or ejection of blood and failure of peripheral compensatory mechanisms. Lymphatic function from the anatomic, fluid management, immune modification standpoints requires study. New therapies from this analysis will improve patients with congestive heart failure.

Cardiac Inotropes Offer Protection of Renal Function in Patients with Kidney Transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Impaired cardiac function is one of the most concomitant symptoms in patients with kidney failure after long-term dialysis. In addition, the preservation of adequate perfusion pressure to the graft plays a significant role in the intraoperative management during kidney transplantation, but the use of positive inotropic drugs in kidney transplant patients has been studied less. We investigated the protective effects of renal function by means of cardiac inotropes in kidney transplant patients.

METHODS

Eighty-nine patients that received kidney transplantation between April 2014 and December 2016 at Qilu Hospital were included and randomly divided into the treatment group receiving levosimendan and a control group. All kidney recipients received ABO-compatible donors. A poor outcome was defined as one of the following: delayed graft function, graft hemorrhage, or nephrectomy.

RESULTS

The treatment group had a better composite outcome and the level of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin was also lower than in the control group.

CONCLUSION

Inotropic drugs may play a protective role in renal function in kidney transplantation.

Comparing the effects of milrinone and olprinone in patients with congestive heart failure

Phosphodiesterase-3 (PDE3) inhibitors are widely used among patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). However, no studies have compared the cardiovascular outcomes between different PDE3 inhibitors in CHF management. In this report, we retrospectively compared the clinical benefits of two PDE3 inhibitors, milrinone and olprinone, to determine which better controls the progression of CHF. A total of 288 hospitalized patients who received PDE3 inhibitors [(milrinone; n = 77 and olprinone; n = 211, respectively)] for CHF were retrospectively enrolled. The primary endpoint was defined as having a major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) or cardiac death by day 60. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate Cox proportional models were used to compare the outcomes for patients treated with milrinone and olprinone. We found no significant differences in the baseline characteristics between the two groups. In patients treated with milrinone, a greater incidence of a MACCE or cardiac death was observed (log rank; P = 0.005 and P = 0.01, respectively). Milrinone-treated patients with ischemic heart disease and chronic kidney disease (CKD) at stage ≥ 4 presented with greater incidence of MACCE (log rank; P < 0.001 and P = 0.006, respectively). Similarly, these patients were significantly more likely to succumb to cardiac death (log rank; P < 0.001 and P = 0.02). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models demonstrated that milrinone treatment was an independent predictor of MACCE [hazard ratio (HR) 3.17; 95% CI 1.64-6.10] and cardiac death (HR 2.64; 95% CI 1.42-4.91). Oral administration of a β-blocker at discharge occurred more often in the olprinone-treated patients than in the milrinone-treated patients (63% vs. 29%, P = 0.004). We compared the outcomes of milrinone and olprinone treatment in patients with CHF. Those treated with milrinone were more likely to succumb to a MACCE or cardiac death within 60 days of treatment, which was especially true for patients with ischemic heart disease or CKD.

Use of Inotropic Agents in Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure

The most common use of inotropes is among hospitalized patients with acute decompensated heart failure, with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and with signs of end-organ dysfunction in the setting of a low cardiac output. Inotropes can be used in patients with severe systolic heart failure awaiting heart transplant to maintain hemodynamic stability or as a bridge to decision. In cases where patients are unable to be weaned off inotropes, these agents can be used until a definite or escalated supportive therapy is planned, which can include coronary revascularization or mechanical circulatory support (intra-aortic balloon pump, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, impella, left ventricular assist device, etc.). Use of inotropic drugs is associated with risks and adverse events. This review will discuss the use of the inotropes digoxin, dopamine, dobutamine, norepinephrine, milrinone, levosimendan, and omecamtiv mecarbil. Long-term inotropic therapy should be offered in selected patients. A detailed conversation with the patient and family shall be held, including a discussion on the risks and benefits of use of inotropes. Chronic heart failure patients awaiting heart transplants are candidates for intravenous inotropic support until the donor heart becomes available. This helps to maintain hemodynamic stability and keep the fluid status and pulmonary pressures optimized prior to the surgery. On the other hand, in patients with severe heart failure who are not candidates for advanced heart failure therapies, such as transplant and mechanical circulatory support, inotropic agents can be used for palliative therapy. Inotropes can help reduce frequency of hospitalizations and improve symptoms in these patients.

Treating volume overload in acutely decompensated heart failure: established and novel therapeutic approaches

BACKGROUND

Most patients hospitalized for acutely decompensated heart failure (ADHF) present with symptoms and signs of volume overload, which is also associated with substantially high rates of death and rehospitalization in ADHF.

OBJECTIVE

To review the recent experimental and clinical evidence on existing therapeutic algorithms and investigational drugs used for the treatment of volume overload in ADHF patients.

METHODS

A systematic search of peer-reviewed publications was performed on Medline and EMBASE from January 1990 to March 2012. The results of unpublished trials were obtained from presentations at national and international meetings.

RESULTS

Apart from intrinsic renal insufficiency and neurohormonal activation, volume overload through venous congestion may be the primary haemodynamic factor triggering the worsening of renal function in ADHF patients. It is well known that heart and kidneys are closely interrelated and an acute or chronic disorder in one organ may induce acute or chronic dysfunction in the other organ. Established therapeutic strategies, (e.g. loop diuretics, vasodilators, and inotropes), are sometimes associated with limited clinical success due to tolerance and the need for frequent up titration of the doses in order to achieve the desired effect. That leads to an increasing interest in novel options, such as the use of adenosine A1 receptor antagonists, vasopressin antagonists, and renal-protective dopamine. Initial clinical trials have shown quite encouraging results in some heart failure subpopulations but have failed to demonstrate a clear beneficial role of these agents. On the other hand, ultrafiltration appears to be a more promising therapeutic procedure that will improve volume regulation, while preserving renal and cardiac function.

CONCLUSION

Further clinical studies are required in order to determine their net effect on renal function and potential cardiovascular outcomes. Until then, management of volume overload in ADHF patients remains a challenge for the clinicians.

Weaning difficult-to-wean chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: a pilot study comparing initial hemodynamic effects of levosimendan and dobutamine

PURPOSE

To compare the short-term hemodynamic effects of levosimendan and dobutamine in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients experiencing weaning difficulties in relation with increased left ventricular filling pressure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective, sequential, pilot study included 10 COPD patients experiencing weaning difficulties in relation with increased left ventricular filling pressure ascertained by an increase >10 mm Hg of pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP) at the shift from mechanical to spontaneous breathing (SB). Patients received 1 h infusion of 7 μg/kg per minute of dobutamine, followed by 24-hour infusion of 0.2 μg/kg per minute levosimendan. Hemodynamic variables were measured under MV and 15 to 30 minutes after SB at baseline, at the end of dobutamine infusion, at a washout period, and after levosimendan infusion.

RESULTS

At baseline, the shift from mechanical ventilation to spontaneous ventilation was associated with a significant increase in PAOP from a median of 15 (interquartile range [IQR], 6) to 29 (9) mm Hg. Both drugs reduced significantly the level of PAOP increase at SB, but levosimendan had a greater effect than dobutamine [median PAOP increase (IQR): 5 (2) vs 9 (4) mm Hg, respectively; P < .01].

CONCLUSIONS

Both drugs reduced the magnitude of PAOP increase at SB in difficult-to-wean COPD patients. PAOP increase was reduced to a greater extent by levosimendan.

Management of acute decompensated heart failure

Acute decompensated heart failure is the most common cause for hospitalization among patients over 65 years of age. It may result from new onset of ventricular dysfunction or, more typically, exacerbation of chronic heart failure symptoms. In-hospital mortality remains high for both systolic and diastolic forms of the disease. Therapy is largely empirical as few randomized, controlled trials have focused on this population and consensus practice guidelines are just beginning to be formulated. Treatment should be focused upon correction of volume overload, identifying potential precipitating causes, and optimizing vasodilator and beta-adrenergic blocker therapy. The majority of patients (>90%) will improve without the use of positive inotropic agents, which should be reserved for patients with refractory hypotension, cardiogenic shock, end-organ dysfunction, or failure to respond to conventional oral and/or intravenous diuretics and vasodilators. The role of aldosterone antagonists, biventricular pacing, and novel pharmacological agents including vasopressin antagonists, endothelin blockers, and calcium-sensitizing agents is also reviewed.

Beta-blocker use in decompensated heart failure

Despite the current advances in treatment, acute decompensated heart failure accounts for more than 1 million hospital admissions annually. Many of the patients hospitalized are already receiving long-term treatment with beta-blockers. For patients who receive full dose beta-blocker therapy and suffer acute decompensated heart failure, clinicians face two key questions: what to do, if anything, with the dosage of beta-blocker and what is the best way to integrate inotropic and beta-blocker therapies for patients who require inotropes. This article discusses these issues and reviews the available literature. Because these topics have received little systematic evaluation, we also present our clinical approaches to these problems.

A review of the natriuretic hormone system's diagnostic and therapeutic potential in critically ill children

OBJECTIVE

To review the natriuretic hormone system and discuss its diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic potential in critically ill children.

DATA SOURCE

A thorough literature search of MEDLINE was performed using search terms including heart defects, congenital; cardiopulmonary bypass, atrial natriuretic factor; natriuretic peptide, brain; carperitide; nesiritide. Preclinical and clinical investigations and review articles were identified that describe the current understanding of the natriuretic hormone system and its role in the regulation of vascular tone and fluid balance in healthy adults and children and in those with underlying cardiac, pulmonary, and renal disease.

RESULTS

A predictable activation of the natriuretic hormone system occurs in children with congenital heart disease and congestive heart failure. Further study is needed to confirm preliminary reports that measurement of natriuretic hormone levels in critically ill children provides diagnostic and prognostic information, as has been demonstrated in adult cardiac populations. Natriuretic hormone infusions provide favorable hemodynamic changes and symptomatic relief when used in adults with decompensated congestive heart failure, and uncontrolled case series suggest that similar benefits may exist in children. The biological activity of the natriuretic hormone system may be decreased following pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass, and additional studies are needed to determine whether natriuretic hormone infusions provide clinical benefit in the postoperative period. Preliminary reports suggest that natriuretic hormone infusions cause physiologic improvements in adults with acute lung injury and asthma but not in those with acute renal failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Although important perturbations of the natriuretic hormone system occur in critically ill infants and children, further investigation is needed before the measurement of natriuretic peptides and the use of natriuretic hormone infusions are incorporated into routine practice.

Reassessment of dobutamine, dopamine, and milrinone in the management of acute heart failure syndromes

The appropriate role of intravenous inodilator therapy (inotropic agents with vasodilator properties) in the management of acute heart failure syndromes (AHFS) has long been a subject of controversy, mainly because of the lack of prospective, placebo-controlled trials and a lack of alternative therapies. The use of intravenous inodilator infusions, however, remains common, but highly variable. As new options emerge for the treatment of AHFS, the available information should be reviewed to determine which approaches are supported by evidence, which are used empirically without evidence, and which should be considered inappropriate. For these purposes, we reviewed data available from randomized controlled trials on short-term, intermittent, and long-term use of intravenous inodilator agents (dobutamine, dopamine, and milrinone) in AHFS. Randomized controlled trials failed to show benefits with current medications and suggested that acute, intermittent, or continuous use of inodilator infusions may increase morbidity and mortality in patients with AHFS. Their use should be restricted to patients who are hypotensive as a result of low cardiac output despite a high left ventricular filling pressure.