Association of Myocardial Ischemia With Mortality and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapy in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease at Risk of Arrhythmic Death

Behind Enemy Lines: Vital Echocardiographic Data Prior to Ventricular Arrhythmia Ablation

Ventricular arrhythmias (VA) are a major cause of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Echocardiography is the first widely available imaging tool which guides VA management strategies. Along with other invasive and noninvasive imaging techniques, it provides essential information for identification of VA substrate such as differentiation between ischemic and non-ischemic etiology and identification of structural heart disease. Both classic as well as novel echocardiographic techniques such as left ventricular strain measurement and mechanical dispersion assessment provide prognostic information and assist in risk stratification. Furthermore, intracardiac echocardiography may have an adjunctive role for the VA ablation by providing real-time visualization of cardiac structures, continuous monitoring of catheter location and early recognition of procedural complications. This review gathers all relevant information that echocardiography may offer prior to VA ablation procedures.

Cardiac arrhythmias in the emergency settings of acute coronary syndrome and revascularization: an European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) consensus document, endorsed by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), and European Acute Cardiovascular Care Association (ACCA)

Despite major therapeutic advances over the last decades, complex supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias (VAs), particularly in the emergency setting or during revascularization for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), remain an important clinical problem. Although the incidence of VAs has declined in the hospital phase of acute coronary syndromes (ACS), mainly due to prompt revascularization and optimal medical therapy, still up to 6% patients with ACS develop ventricular tachycardia and/or ventricular fibrillation within the first hours of ACS symptoms. Despite sustained VAs being perceived predictors of worse in-hospital outcomes, specific associations between the type of VAs, arrhythmia timing, applied treatment strategies and long-term prognosis in AMI are vague. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common supraventricular tachyarrhythmia that may be asymptomatic and/or may be associated with rapid haemodynamic deterioration requiring immediate treatment. It is estimated that over 20% AMI patients may have a history of AF, whereas the new-onset arrhythmia may occur in 5% patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction. Importantly, patients who were treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention for AMI and developed AF have higher rates of adverse events and mortality compared with subjects free of arrhythmia. The scope of this position document is to cover the clinical implications and pharmacological/non-pharmacological management of arrhythmias in emergency presentations and during revascularization. Current evidence for clinical relevance of specific types of VAs complicating AMI in relation to arrhythmia timing has been discussed.

Risk Stratification for Sudden Cardiac Death After Myocardial Infarction

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) accounts for ∼50% of mortality after myocardial infarction (MI). Most SCDs result from ventricular tachyarrhythmias, and the tachycardias that precipitate cardiac arrest result from multiple mechanisms. As a result, it is highly unlikely that any single test will identify all patients at risk for SCD. Current guidelines for use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) to prevent SCD are based primarily on measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Although reduced LVEF is associated with increased total cardiac mortality after MI, the focus of current guidelines on LVEF omits ∼50% of patients who die suddenly. In addition, there is no evidence of a mechanistic link between reduced LVEF and arrhythmias. Thus, LVEF is neither sensitive nor specific as a tool for post-MI risk stratification. Newer tests to screen for predisposition to ventricular arrhythmias and SCD examine abnormalities of ventricular repolarization, autonomic nervous system function, and electrical heterogeneity. These tests, as well as older methods such as programmed stimulation, the signal-averaged electrocardiogram, and spontaneous ventricular ectopy, do not perform well in patients with LVEF ≤30%. Recent observational studies suggest, however, that these tests may have greater utility in patients with LVEF >30%. Because SCD results from multiple mechanisms, it is likely that combinations of risk factors will prove more precise for risk stratification. Prospective trials that evaluate the performance of risk stratification schema to determine ICD use are necessary for cost-effective reduction of the incidence of SCD after MI.

Evaluation of Need for Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator by Thallium-201 Scintigraphy Among Japanese Patients With Prior Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND

Identifying who among current Japanese patients with prior myocardial infarction (MI) would benefit from an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is imperative. Accordingly, this study seeks to determine whether single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) can help identify such patients. Methods and Results: This retrospective study enrolled 60 consecutive patients with prior MI who underwent stress thallium-201 SPECT and ICD implantation from February 2000 to October 2014. Occurrence of arrhythmic death and/or or appropriate ICD therapy, defined as shock or antitachycardia pacing for ventricular fibrillation or tachycardia, was identified until November 2016. During the median follow-up interval of 6.6 years, 18 (30%) patients experienced arrhythmic death and/or appropriate ICD therapy. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis revealed that the summed stress score (SSS) [hazard ratio (HR)=1.14; P=0.005] and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at rest (HR=0.92; P=0.038) were significantly associated with the occurrence of arrhythmic events. Patients with SSS ≥21 and LVEF ≤30%, which were determined to be the best cutoff points, had significantly higher incidence of the arrhythmic events than the other patients (64% vs. 11%; HR=7.18; log-rank P=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

SSS using stress thallium-201 SPECT in combination with LVEF can help determine the need for ICD therapy among current Japanese patients with prior MI.

Continuous ST-Monitoring Function of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Detects Silent Ischemia in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

Background

Newer implantable cardioverter defibrillators can monitor intracardiac ECGs , but their ability to detect ischemia is unclear. This study investigated the usefulness of implantable cardioverter defibrillators with an ST‐monitoring function in coronary artery disease patients.

Methods and Results

We conducted a prospective study of implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients with the ST‐monitoring function. One hundred seventy‐three patients who received implantable cardioverter defibrillators for primary or secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death. All patients underwent medical examinations at least every 6 months, with standard 12‐lead ECGs and device checks that included analysis of the ST‐monitoring function. Myocardial perfusion imaging or coronary angiography was performed during the follow‐up. The mean follow‐up duration was 23.3±7.7 months. Significant ST changes occurred in 15 patients (8.7%), of whom 14 were asymptomatic. The incidence of angina pectoris was significantly higher in the ST change (+) group than that in the ST change (−) group (28.6% versus 7.2%, P=0.03). In the patients who underwent myocardial perfusion imaging, the sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value of the ST‐monitoring feature to detect ischemia were 75.0%, 72.5%, and 93.5%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value of the ST‐monitoring feature to predict residual stenosis evaluated using coronary angiography were 76.9%, 83.5%, and 97.5%, respectively. The percentage of patients with a septal right ventricular lead was significantly lower in the ST change (+) group than in the ST change (−) group (13.5% versus 33.5%, P=0.01).

Conclusions

If intracardiac ECGs ST changes are detected, it is necessary to use additional modalities even in asymptomatic patients.

Clinical Trial Registration

URL: http://upload.umin.ac.jp. Unique identifier: UMIN000011824.

Risk Stratification of Sudden Cardiac Death After Acute Myocardial Infarction

Despite advances in the diagnosis and treatment of acute coronary syndromes and an overall improvement in outcomes, mortality after myocardial infarction (MI) remains high. Sudden death, which is most frequently due to ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation, is the cause of death in 25% to 50% of patients with prior MI, and therefore represents an important public health problem. Use of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), which is the primary method of reducing the chance of arrhythmic sudden death after MI, is costly to the medical system and is associated with procedural and long-term risks. Additionally, assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), which is the primary method of assessing a patient's post-MI sudden death risk and appropriateness for ICD implantation, lacks both sensitivity and specificity for sudden death, and may not be the optimal way to select the subgroup of post-MI patients who are most likely to benefit from ICD implantation. To optimally utilize ICDs, it is therefore critical to develop and prospectively validate sudden death risk stratification methods beyond measuring LVEF. A variety of tests that assess left ventricular systolic function/morphology, potential triggers for ventricular arrhythmias, ventricular conduction/repolarization, and autonomic tone have been proposed as sudden death risk stratification tools. Multivariable models have also been developed to assess the competing risks of arrhythmic and non-arrhythmic death so that ICDs can be utilized more effectively. This manuscript will review the epidemiology of sudden death after MI, and will discuss the current state of sudden death risk stratification in this population.

Diagnostic and prognostic roles of echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance

Accurate prediction of sudden cardiac death due to ventricular arrhythmia remains challenging. Left ventricular ejection fraction has shown an association with increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias and is included in the recommendations for implantable cardioverter defibrillator as primary prevention. However, left ventricular ejection fraction may be normal in a large number of patients who are at risk of ventricular arrhythmias. Echocardiography remains the imaging technique of first choice to rule out the presence of structural heart disease and assess left and right ventricular function. Advances in strain echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance have provided important insights into the mechanisms of ventricular arrhythmias, and will be summarized in this review.

Frequency and Implications of Ischemia Prior to Ventricular Tachyarrhythmia in Patients Treated With a Wearable Cardioverter Defibrillator Following Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND

Autopsy studies imply that recurrent myocardial infarction (MI) accounts for the majority of sudden death early after acute MI, rather than primary arrhythmia. However, diagnosis of recurrent MI by autopsy is challenging and excludes electrocardiographic data to adjudicate arrhythmic causes. We examined the frequency of ischemia prior to treated ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF) and outcomes in patients using the wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) following acute MI.

HYPOTHESIS

Primary arrhythmia, rather than ischemia, is a frequent contributor to sudden death following MI.

METHODS

All patients treated for VT/VF over a 6-year period while wearing a WCD following acute MI with advanced left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction ≤35%) were included. Patients with ST-segment changes ≥0.1 mV before VT/VF were classified ischemic. Demographics and clinical outcomes were compared between those with ischemia-mediated vs primary arrhythmia.

RESULTS

Among 273 patients fulfilling study criteria, 15.4% had ischemia prior to VT/VF. Clinical and WCD use characteristics did not significantly differ between ischemic and primary VT/VF groups. Termination of VT/VF by WCD treatment approximated 96% in both groups. Survival 24 hours post-treatment was 88% and 84% (P = 0.54) for patients with and without ischemic VT/VF, respectively. Furthermore, 30-day cumulative survival for those with and without ischemic VT/VF was 77% and 70%, respectively (P = 0.57).

CONCLUSIONS

Ischemia is an infrequent cause of VT/VF following MI, contradicting previous study conclusions that recurrent MI is responsible for most post-MI sudden death. Etiology of VT/VF, however, did not influence defibrillation success or survival, which was high for both groups.

Sudden Cardiac Death: A Review Focused on Cardiovascular Imaging

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is defined as natural death due to cardiac causes, heralded by abrupt loss of consciousness within 1 h of the onset of acute symptoms; pre-existing heart disease may have been known to be present but the time and mode of death are unexpected. Prediction and prevention of SCD is an area of active investigation, but considerable challenges persist that limit the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of available methodologies. It was well-recognized that optimization of SCD risk stratification would require integration of multi-disciplinary efforts at the bench and bedside, with studies in the general population. This integration has yet to be effectively accomplished. There is also increasing awareness that more investigation needs to be directed toward the identification of early predictors of SCD. Significant advancements have recently occurred for risk prediction in the inherited channelopathies and other inherited conditions that predispose to SCD, but there is much to be accomplished in this regard for the more common complex phenotypes, such as SCD among patients with coronary artery disease. A multimodality imaging approach is actually the most important tool to provide comprehensive information on different pathophysiological mechanisms related to SCD.

Influence of diabetes mellitus on inappropriate and appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy and mortality in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Reduce Inappropriate Therapy (MADIT-RIT) Trial

BACKGROUND

The relationship between diabetes mellitus and risk of inappropriate or appropriate therapy in patients receiving an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and resynchronization therapy has not been investigated thoroughly. The effect of innovative ICD programming on therapy delivery in these patients is unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Reduce Inappropriate Therapy (MADIT-RIT) randomized patients with a primary prophylactic ICD indication to 3 different types of ICD programming: conventional programming with a ventricular tachycardia zone of 170 to 199 bpm (arm A), high-rate cutoff with a ventricular tachycardia zone ≥200 bpm (arm B), or 60-second-delayed therapy (arm C). The end points of inappropriate therapy, appropriate therapy, and death were assessed among 485 patients with and 998 without diabetes mellitus. Innovative ICD programming reduced the risk of inappropriate therapy regardless of diabetes mellitus, although a trend toward a more pronounced effect of high-rate cutoff programming was seen in patients without diabetes mellitus (P for interaction=0.06). Diabetes mellitus was associated with a decreased risk of inappropriate therapy (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.36-0.80; P=0.002) and increased risk of appropriate therapy (hazard ratio, 1.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-2.14; P=0.003). In diabetic patients, there was significantly increased risk of death in those who had inappropriate therapy (hazard ratio, 4.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.52-11.40; P=0.005) and appropriate therapy (hazard ratio, 2.49; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-5.87; P=0.037) compared with those who did not.

CONCLUSIONS

Innovative high-rate cutoff or delayed ICD programming was associated with a reduction in inappropriate therapy in patients with and without diabetes mellitus. Diabetes mellitus was associated with lower risk of inappropriate therapy but higher risk of appropriate therapy. Appropriate and inappropriate ICD therapy was associated with increased mortality in diabetic patients.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. UNIQUE IDENTIFIER: NCT00947310.

Effect of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator on left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy

Current guidelines have indicated an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) for patients with severe idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, for both primary and secondary prevention. Compared to coronary artery disease, the overall benefit has been smaller. A more refined risk assessment, using the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and prevention mode (primary/secondary), is still needed to guide ICD implantation. Patients included in 2 large ICD registers were analyzed regarding the appropriate therapies and improvement of LVEF, overall and in subgroups of prevention mode and LVEF < 20% versus > 20%. Overall, 349 patients were included; 70% were men, the mean age was 54 years, and the mean follow-up was 33 months. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) was used in 57%, and secondary prevention was present in 30%. ICD therapies were delivered to 33% of the patients, in most for ventricular tachycardia. Patients receiving an ICD for secondary prevention and non-CRT were more likely to have arrhythmic events (both p < 0.05). The cumulative event rates at 5 years were 53% for secondary and 33% for primary prevention (p < 0.001). Depending on the prevention mode and LVEF status (< 20% vs > 20%), the event rates ranged from 30% to 76%. The mean LVEF improved by 10%, independently of the stimulation mode (CRT 22% to 31%, non-CRT 26% to 35%; p < 0.0001). A persistent improvement to > 35% was seen in only 25% of CRT patients but in 45% of non-CRT patients (p = 0.004). In conclusion, the results from the present study have demonstrated that in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, the potential for LVEF improvement is considerable and that the rate of ICD interventions strongly depends on the prevention mode and LVEF. These findings could be the basis for additional risk stratification tools.

Use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is the most effective treatment for patients with life-threatening ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation not due to reversible causes. The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association class I and IIa indications for an ICD are discussed. Patients with ICDs who need pacing should be treated with biventricular pacing, not with dual-chamber rate-responsive pacing, at a rate of 70/min. Patients with ICDs should be treated with β-blockers, statins and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers.

Will imaging assist in the selection of patients with heart failure for an ICD?

Sudden cardiac death remains the leading cause of death in the U.S. A left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)<30% to 35% identifies a population of patients at increased risk for sudden cardiac death. Once identified, an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is effective in reducing the occurrence of sudden cardiac death. Yet in a substantial proportion of patients who receive an ICD based on reduced LVEF, the device never delivers therapy. Furthermore, the majority of patients who die suddenly do not qualify for ICD placement under current LVEF-based criteria in the guidelines. This review considers the potential role of cardiac imaging in improving the selection of patients most likely to benefit from an ICD. The presence of myocardial scar and/or unrevascularized myocardial ischemia provides an important substrate for the occurrence of potentially fatal ventricular arrhythmias. The presence of clinical heart failure further increases the risk of ventricular arrhythmia. The sympathetic nervous system provides an important trigger for major arrhythmic events, both through global overactivity and through regional heterogeneity of sympathetic activity. A mismatch of myocardial perfusion and innervation may pose a particularly great risk. Imaging modalities provide unique opportunities to investigate the anatomic and pathophysiologic substrates, as well as the triggering effects of cardiac sympathetic innervation. Combining imaging and electrophysiologic modalities offers promise for improved accuracy in future selection of patients with heart failure for ICD placement.

Mortality in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction </=30% after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Decreased left ventricular (LV) function is a strong predictor of mortality. Although current guidelines recommend prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation after ST-elevation myocardial infarction and a depressed LV ejection fraction for 1 month, the prognoses of these patients may be better than those observed in randomized trials of ICDs (1-year mortality 6.8% to 19%), particularly because reperfusion treatment has improved, and the use of life-saving drugs is higher. To assess 1-year mortality in patients with depressed LV ejection fractions after primary percutaneous coronary intervention, a prospective, observational study was performed. Data from all patients who survived >/=30 days after primary percutaneous coronary intervention and had LV ejection fractions </=30% from 1994 to 2004 were recorded. Of 2,544 patients, 342 (13%) had LV ejection fractions </=30%. One-year mortality was 5.8%. Sudden death was the most common cause of death (40%). Patients who died more often had multivessel disease and a higher incidence of recurrent myocardial infarction within 1 year. In conclusion, current mortality in patients with depressed LV ejection fractions after primary percutaneous coronary intervention is much better than that observed in previous ICD trials, and the benefits of ICD therapy in these patients should be further evaluated.

[Coronary artery disease--relevance of total coronary revascularization on the incidence of malignant arrhythmias]

Myocardial ischemia induces redistribution of different ions (H(+), K(+), Na(+), Ca(++)) across the cardiomyocyte membrane, as well as the loss of intracellular ATP content. This results in changes in the electrical properties including shortening of the action potential, appearance of delayed afterpotentials, and a modified refractoriness of the cardiomyocyte. These changes may induce or support malignant cardiac arrhythmias. Supersensitivity of sympathetic denervated myocardium may further support the electrical instability of ischemic myocardium.Virtues of studies indicate that patients with coronary artery disease who develop complex arrhythmias during or after exercise bear a substantially increased risk for sudden cardiac death. Other studies report about arrhythmic stabilization and reduced mortality if patients with reversible myocardial ischemia receive complete revascularization. However, none of these studies is without methodological flaws. Due to the lack of methodologically sound studies in sufficiently large patient cohorts, the question whether complete coronary revascularisation improves the prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease and which strategy (medical, interventional, or surgical) warrants the best outcomes remains open.

Implantable defibrillator early after primary percutaneous intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: rationale and design of the Defibrillator After Primary Angioplasty (DAPA) trial

BACKGROUND

It has been shown that an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) may be beneficial when added to optimal drug treatment in patients with reduced left ventricular function who survive a myocardial infarction (MI). However, it is not known whether patients with increased risk of death after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-elevation MI also have benefit of prophylactic ICD therapy to reduce sudden cardiac death.

METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN

The DAPA trial is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ICD in high-risk patients after primary PCI for ST-elevation MI. In this randomized multicenter controlled study, a total of 700 patients will be included. Enrolment started in October 2004. Inclusion criteria are thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow less than 3 after primary PCI or left ventricular ejection fraction lower than 30% as measured short after admission for the index MI. Patients will be randomized between 30 and 60 days after their MI. The primary end point will be total death during the follow-up period of at least 3 years for each patient.

CONCLUSIONS

This multicenter trial of patients at high risk of death after primary angioplasty for ST-elevation MI will evaluate prophylactic ICD therapy in addition to the current standard of care.