Atorvastatin Pretreatment Improves Outcomes in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Early Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Increases Significantly During Brief Discontinuation of Atorvastatin and Correlates With Metabolite Half-Lives

Variability in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) has emerged as a potential independent cardiovascular risk factor, but the impact of short-term discontinuation of statins on LDL-C remains to be defined. Furthermore, the relationship between individual statin metabolites and changes in LDL-C has not yet been examined. The present study aimed to investigate changes in LDL-C concentrations during a four-day discontinuation of atorvastatin therapy and to examine correlations between the half-lives of atorvastatin metabolites and LDL-C concentrations. This pharmacokinetic intervention study included 60 adults with confirmed adherence to atorvastatin, using doses of 20 mg (N = 20), 40 mg (N = 20), or 80 mg (N = 20) at study start. Atorvastatin was then discontinued, and blood samples were collected from day zero to day four. We assessed daily concentrations of LDL-C and of atorvastatin with its metabolites by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The mean (SD) LDL-C at baseline was 1.84 (0.6) mmol/L. LDL-C increased on average by 0.50 mmol/L (27%) from day zero to day four. The increase in LDL-C was significant already 48 h after the last statin intake and was affected by individual variation in baseline concentrations and the slope of the daily increase. A moderate correlation was found between differences in LDL-C concentrations and the half-lives of hydroxylated atorvastatin metabolites. In conclusion, 4 days without atorvastatin resulted in an almost 30% increase in LDL-C concentrations, and the increase was significant already after the first omitted dose. The half-lives of hydroxylated atorvastatin metabolites showed a moderate correlation with the increase in LDL-C concentrations.

Impact of a personalized, strike early and strong lipid-lowering approach on low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels and cardiovascular outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction

AIMS

Considering the lack of evidence, we evaluated the impact on cardiovascular outcome of the systematic introduction in our institution of a personalized strike early and strong (SES) approach for lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) in patients admitted for acute myocardial infarction (MI).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We retrospectively analysed data from 500 consecutive patients hospitalized across three periods: Period A (N = 198, January-June 2019), when the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal was <70 mg/dL and a stepwise LLT approach was recommended; Period B (N = 180, January-June 2021), when the LDL-C goal was <55 mg/dL and a stepwise approach was recommended; Period C (N = 122, January-June 2023), when the LDL-C goal was <55 mg/dL and our SES protocol was implemented. Primary endpoints were achievement of the LDL-C goal during follow-up and 1-year incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Compared to the other periods, in Period C, there was a higher use of potent statins, alone or in combination with ezetimibe, and of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor inhibitors at discharge. This translated into higher achievement of the LDL-C goal (83% vs. 55% in Period A and 43% in Period B; P < 0.001) and reduced incidence of MACE (3% vs. 12% and 11%; P = 0.026). MACE rates were lowest in patients with early and sustained LDL-C <55 mg/dL and in those achieving both LDL-C <55 mg/dL and ≥50% LDL-C reduction.

CONCLUSION

The systematic introduction of a personalized, SES strategy for LLT in patients with acute MI led to greater achievement of LDL-C goal and lower risk of MACE at 1 year vs. the stepwise approach.

Preoperative LDL-C and major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events after non-cardiac surgery

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine whether preoperative LDL-C concentration affects the risk of perioperative major adverse cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events (MACCE) after noncardiac surgery.

DESIGN

Single center retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Hospital (including medical and surgical floor, intensive care unit) and patient disposition location (including the patient's home or any other receiving facility).

PATIENTS

43,348 non-cardiac surgeries at NYU Langone Health between January 2016 and September 2020.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were grouped based on preoperative LDL-C.

MEASUREMENTS

Complete serum lipid panel obtained within one year prior to the date of noncardiac surgery and rate of perioperative MACCE, defined as a composite of in-hospital non-fatal myocardial infarction, in-hospital acute ischemic stroke, myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery, and death from any cause within 30 days of surgery.

MAIN RESULTS

Perioperative MACCE occurred in 1093 patients (2.5 %) overall. After multivariable adjustment, odds of MACCE were significantly lower in patients with higher (≥100 mg/dL) versus lower (<100 mg/dL) LDL-C (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.783, 95 % CI, 0.660-0.926]).

CONCLUSIONS

In a large cohort of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery at a major academic health system in New York City, lower LDL-C concentrations were not associated with a lower incidence of perioperative MACCE. Further investigation into modifiable perioperative cardiovascular risk factors is needed to improve perioperative outcomes.

Statin Therapy before Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Novel Bridge between Thrombin and Thrombomodulin for Enhanced Cardiovascular Protection

Percutaneous coronary intervention administration of statins enhances the thrombin-thrombomodulin (TM) interaction, which is critical for the prevention of post-procedural cardiovascular complications. Atomic force microscopy showed that statins increased the single molecule rupture forces between thrombin and TM, suggesting a strengthened complex. This was supported by surface plasmon resonance, which showed an enhanced binding affinity under the statin treatment. Molecular docking and dynamics simulations revealed that statins can bind to both thrombin and TM, forming stable complexes that facilitate protein C activation. Clinically relevant doses of statins were found to significantly enhance the thrombin-TM interaction, potentially reducing the risk of myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis by augmenting the endothelial anticoagulant properties through the thrombin-TM pathway. By acting as a bridge, statins foster more stable thrombin-TM complexes, supporting endogenous anticoagulant mechanisms and leading to better cardiovascular outcomes.

A Case-Based Approach to the Management of Patients with Chronic Coronary Disease: Updates from the 2023 AHA/ACC Guidelines

The 2023 American Heart Association (AHA)/American College of Cardiology (ACC) Multisociety Guideline for the Management of Patients with Chronic Coronary Disease presents important updates to the care of patients with chronic coronary disease. The recommendations of these guidelines inform the care for patients with 1) asymptomatic coronary artery disease, 2) stable angina or equivalent symptoms (e.g., dyspnea upon exertion), 3) symptomatic nonobstructive coronary disease including coronary microvascular dysfunction and vasospasm, and 4) left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction with known coronary artery disease. In this review, we aim to demonstrate key recommendations in the 2023 guideline using the following four hypothetical cases.

Development and validation of a SCORing systEm for pre-thrombectomy diagnosis of IntraCranial Atherosclerotic Disease (Score-ICAD)

BACKGROUND

Early identification of intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) may impact the management of patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy (MT). We sought to develop and validate a scoring system for pre-thrombectomy diagnosis of ICAD in anterior circulation large vessel/distal medium vessel occlusion strokes (LVOs/DMVOs).

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of two prospectively maintained comprehensive stroke center databases including patients with anterior circulation occlusions spanning 2010-22 (development cohort) and 2018-22 (validation cohort). ICAD cases were matched for age and sex (1:1) to non-ICAD controls.

RESULTS

Of 2870 MTs within the study period, 348 patients were included in the development cohort: 174 anterior circulation ICAD (6% of 2870 MTs) and 174 controls. Multivariable analysis β coefficients led to a 20 point scale: absence of atrial fibrillation (5); vascular risk factor burden (1) for each of hypertension, diabetes, smoking, and hyperlipidemia; multifocal single artery stenoses on CT angiography (3); absence of territorial cortical infarct (3); presence of borderzone infarct (3); or ipsilateral carotid siphon calcification (2). The validation cohort comprised 56 ICAD patients (4.1% of 1359 MTs): 56 controls. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.88 (0.84-0.91) and 0.82 (0.73-0.89) in the development and validation cohorts, respectively. Calibration slope and intercept showed a good fit for the development cohort although with overestimated risk for the validation cohort. After intercept adjustment, the overestimation was corrected (intercept 0, 95% CI -0.5 to -0.5; slope 0.8, 95% CI 0.5 to 1.1). In the full cohort (n=414), ≥11 points showed the best performance for distinguishing ICAD from non-ICAD, with 0.71 (95% CI 0.65 to 0.78) sensitivity and 0.82 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.87) specificity, and 3.92 (95% CI 2.92 to 5.28) positive and 0.35 (95% CI 0.28 to 0.44) negative likelihood ratio. Scores ≥12 showed 90% specificity and 63% sensitivity.

CONCLUSION

The proposed scoring system for preprocedural diagnosis of ICAD LVOs and DMVOs presented satisfactory discrimination and calibration based on clinical and non-invasive radiological data.

Commencement of Atorvastatin and Ezetimibe Immediately in Patients Presenting with Acute Coronary Syndrome

Lipids are implicated in the development of coronary atherosclerosis. Achieving a significant reduction in lipid levels remains a crucial aspect of secondary prevention following an acute coronary syndrome event. Novel lipid-lowering therapies now provide clinicians with a variety of therapeutic strategies to choose from and tailor to individual patient needs. This review focuses on evidence supporting the importance of early and intensive lipid-lowering therapy use in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome, specifically addressing data relating to atorvastatin and ezetimibe use in this high-risk cohort of patients.

Evaluation of preprocedural statin loading on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention

Background and aim

High-dose statin therapy before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is thought to reduce the occurrence of Peri-procedural Myocardial Infarction (PPMI), which is associated with increased mortality and prolonged hospitalization, especially in statin naïve patients. This study aims to investigate the effect of rosuvastatin loading dose on PPMI and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) in patients undergoing elective PCI, considering their statin use.

Methods

One hundred sixty-five patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) without heart failure (HF) or chronic kidney disease (CKD) were included in the study. They were divided into two groups: patients already on statin treatment (n:126) and statin naive patients (n:39). Both groups were randomly assigned to high-dose (40 mg) rosuvastatin (n:86) or a non- loading dose group (n:79). The primary endpoint was the incidence of PPMI, and the secondary endpoint was MACCE.

Results

The mean age of study population was 59 ± 9.4 years with 77% being male (n = 127). The median follow-up (FU) time was 368 day. Thirty patients were diagnosed with PPMI after PCI (19 in the high-dose group and 11 in the no-loading-dose group). Meanwhile, less than half of study population (77 patients, 46.7%) had complex lesion type (B2, C) and 88 of those (53.3%) had simple lesion type (A, B1). PPMI was observed more frequently in statin-naive patients (23%) than in statin users (17%), although the difference was not statistically significant. Only two patients (1.2%) experienced MACCE during the FU period. One of these patients, who had a type C lesion, belonged to group A2 and underwent Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) on the 391st day. The other patient, with a type B1 lesion, was in group A1 and was hospitalized due to Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) on the 40th day of FU.

Conclusions

Pre-procedural administration of high dose rosuvastatin in patients with stable coronary artery disease did not decrease PPMI, independent of chronic statin use.

In-hospital cardiac arrest after STEMI: prevention strategies and post-arrest care

INTRODUCTION

In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (IHCA) after ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) is a subset of IHCA with high morbidity. While information on this selected group of patients is limited, closer inspection reveals that this is a challenging patient population with certain risk factors for IHCA following treatment of STEMI.

AREAS COVERED

In this review article, strategies for prevention of IHCA post STEMI are reviewed, as well as best-practices for the care of STEMI patients post-IHCA.

EXPERT OPINION

Early and successful reperfusion is key for the prevention of IHCA and has a significant impact on in-hospital mortality. A number of pharmacological treatments have also been studied that can impact the progression to IHCA. Development of cardiogenic shock post-STEMI increases mortality and raises the risk of cardiac arrest. The treatment of IHCA follows the ACLS algorithm with some notable exceptions.

Preoperative statin therapy for adults undergoing cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

Despite significant advances in surgical techniques and perioperative care, people undertaking cardiac surgery due to cardiovascular disease are more prone to the development of postoperative adverse events. Statins (5-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-co-enzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors) are well-known for their anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects and are established for primary and secondary prevention of coronary artery disease. In addition, statins are thought to have clinical benefits in perioperative outcomes in people undergoing cardiac surgery. This review is an update of a review that was first published in 2012 and updated in 2015.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of preoperative statin therapy in adults undergoing cardiac surgery compared to standard of care or placebo.

SEARCH METHODS

We performed a search of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Issue 9, 2023), Ovid MEDLINE (1980 to 14 September 2023), and Ovid Embase (1980 to 2023 (week 36)). We applied no language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any statin treatment before cardiac surgery, for any given duration and dose, versus no preoperative statin therapy (standard of care) or placebo. We excluded trials without a registered trial protocol and trials without approval by an institutional ethics committee.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methodology. Primary outcomes were short-term mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events. Secondary outcomes were myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, stroke, renal failure, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, length of hospital stay and adverse effects related to statin therapy. We reported effect measures as risk ratios (RRs) or mean differences (MDs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We used the RoB 1 tool to assess the risk of bias in included trials, and GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified eight RCTs (five new to this review) including 5592 participants. Pooled analysis showed that statin treatment before surgery may result in little to no difference in the risk of postoperative short-term mortality (RR 1.36, 95% CI 0.72 to 2.59; I2 = 0%; 6 RCTs, 5260 participants; low-certainty evidence; note 2 RCTs reported 0 events in both groups so RR calculated from 4 RCTs with 5143 participants). We are very uncertain about the effect of statins on major adverse cardiovascular events (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.13; 1 RCT, 2406 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Statins probably result in little to no difference in myocardial infarction (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.06; I2 = 0%; 5 RCTs, 4645 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), may result in little to no difference in atrial fibrillation (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.05; I2 = 60%; 8 RCTs, 5592 participants; low-certainty evidence), and may result in little to no difference in stroke (RR 1.47, 95% CI 0.90 to 2.40; I2 = 0%; 4 RCTs, 5143 participants; low-certainty evidence). We are very uncertain about the effect of statins on renal failure (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.34; I2 = 57%; 4 RCTs, 4728 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Additionally, statins probably result in little to no difference in length of ICU stay (MD 1.40 hours, 95% CI -1.62 to 4.41; I2 = 43%; 3 RCTs, 4528 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and overall hospital stay (MD -0.31 days, 95% CI -0.64 to 0.03; I2 = 84%; 5 RCTs, 4788 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). No study had any individual risk of bias domain classified as high. However, two studies were at high risk of bias overall given the classification of unclear risk of bias in three domains.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In this updated Cochrane review, we found no evidence that statin use in the perioperative period of elective cardiac surgery was associated with any clinical benefit or worsening, when compared with placebo or standard of care. Compared with placebo or standard of care, statin use probably results in little to no difference in MIs, length of ICU stay and overall hospital stay; and may make little to no difference to mortality, atrial fibrillation and stroke. We are very uncertain about the effects of statins on major harmful cardiac events and renal failure. The certainty of the evidence validating this finding varied from moderate to very low, depending on the outcome. Future trials should focus on assessing the impact of statin therapy on mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events.

Early Management of Blood Lipid Levels with Non-Statin Lipid-Lowering Drugs in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Mini Review

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality, despite many improvements in its prevention and management. Lipid management is an important aspect of secondary prevention after ACS. Previous studies indicate that the early use of intensive statin therapy in patients with ACS may alleviate the risk of recurrent cardiovascular events and mortality. However, many patients do not reach the target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level of < 55 mg/dL with statin monotherapy, and muscle-related adverse effects caused by statins hinder adherence to treatment. Novel non-statin agents are recommended for patients who cannot achieve the target LDL-C levels with high-intensity statin therapy and those with statin intolerance. The combination of statins and non-statins may synergistically affect intensively lowering LDL-C through different mechanisms, which could lead to better cardiovascular outcomes than statin monotherapy. However, it remains uncertain whether the early use of combination lipid-lowering therapy is more beneficial. The present review summarizes the benefits of intensive statin monotherapy and their early combination with non-statin medications including ezetimibe, PCSK9 inhibitors, inclisiran, and bempedoic acid (BDA) in the management of ACS.

Association between statin therapy and long-term clinical outcomes in patients with stable coronary disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

This longitudinal cohort study examined the long-term effect of statin therapy on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). A total of 1760 patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) were divided by receipt of statin therapy or not after index PCI. Baseline clinical characteristics, risk factors, angiographic findings, and medications after interventional procedure were assessed to compare long-term clinical outcomes between groups. Predictors for all-cause death and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including myocardial infarction (MI), cardiovascular death, and repeated PCI procedures, were also analyzed. The statin therapy group had higher average serum cholesterol and more elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) than the non-statin therapy group (189.0 ± 47.9 vs 169.3 ± 37.00 mg/dl, 117.2 ± 42.6 vs 98.7 ± 31.8 mg/dl, respectively, both P < 0.001). The non-statin group had higher rates of all-cause death and cardiovascular death compared to statin group (both P < 0.001). After adjustment for age, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease, Cox proportion hazard analysis revealed statin use significantly reduced all-cause death and repeated PCI procedure (hazard ratio: 0.53 and 0.69, respectively). Statin use seemed not reduce the hazard of cardiovascular death or MI in patients with stable CAD after PCI; however, statin therapy still was associated with reduced rates of all-cause death and repeat PCI procedure.

Treatment of dyslipidemia in acute coronary syndrome

Despite numerous improvements in the management of acute coronary syndrome(ACS), it is a major cause of mortality in India. Lipids play a critical role in pathogenesis of ACS and reduction of lipid parameters plays a pivotal role in secondary prevention. High total cholesterol and high low-density lipoprotein(LDL) are the major lipid abnormalities globally as well as in Indians. Among all the lipid parameters, LDL is the primary target of lipid-lowering therapies across the globe. High-dose statins, ezetimibe, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors, and bempedoic acid are recommended therapies for LDL reduction in ACS patients. Statins have pleiotropic effects on the modulation of thrombogenesis, endothelial dysfunction, and myocardial protection. Multiple randomised controlled trials and meta-analyses have shown that the use of high-dose statin has significant benefits in ACS. LDL reduction goal is < 55 mg/dl or at least 50 % reduction from the baseline regardless of age or gender. Non-fasting LDL should be measured soon after the ACS as it varies minimally with food intake. The first line of therapy after ACS is to advise lifestyle modifications, combination therapy including high-dose statin with ezetimibe, and evaluation after 4-6 weeks of the index event. If the goal is not achieved then PCSK 9 inhibitors or Bempedoic acid should be used in combination with statins and ezetimibe to reduce recurrent ischaemic events. Despite the proven effect of these lipid-lowering therapies, undertreatment is still a big hurdle across the globe. Prohibitive costs, adverse effects, medication non-adherence, variation in health practice in different countries, and clinical inertia to prescribe this medication by physicians are the main reasons for the undertreatment.

The Prognostic impact of treatments evolution in STEMI

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate in a real-world primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) registry the impact of the evolution of evidence-based treatments on prognosis.

METHODS

STEMI patients undergoing pPCI at the University Hospital of Trieste, Italy, were enrolled. The first cohort (old treatments cohort) included STEMI patients treated between January-2007 and December-2012, and the second cohort (new treatments cohort), between January-2013 and December-2020. Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW) Cox regression models as well as multivariable Cox regression models were performed to assess the risk of a composite primary endpoint (PE) of all cause death, reinfarction and re-PCI at 5 years.

RESULTS

A total of 2425 STEMI patients were enrolled. At multivariable Cox regression, the new-treatments cohort had lower risk of PE and mortality. Weighted (IPTW) Cox proportional hazard models confirmed the lower risk of the new treatments cohort for PE (HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.56-0.91, p = 0.007) and 5-year mortality (HR 0.70, 95%CI 0.54-0.91, p = 0.009). When considering both clinical and procedural variables, complete revascularization (HR 0.46, 95%CI 0.27-0.80, p = 0.006) and the administration of prasugrel or ticagrelor (HR 0.72, 95%CI 0.52-0.99, p = 0.013) were independent predictors of PE as well as of 5-year mortality. Patients receiving prasugrel or ticagrelor or drug eluting stent were at lower risk of 1-year stent thrombosis (HR 0.50, 95%CI 0.28-0.90, p = 0.021).

CONCLUSIONS

In a real-word STEMI population the prognosis of patients has improved in the last decades, and this was associated to the use of new antithrombotic treatments and to the implementation of complete revascularization.

Lipoprotein(a) and Benefit of PCSK9 Inhibition in Emergency Complex Higher-risk and Indicated Patients

OBJECTIVE

There is a large population of patients classified as complex higher-risk and indicated patients (CHIPs) in China with a poor prognosis. The treatment of these patients is complex and challenging, especially when acute cardiac events occur, such as acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or heart failure. Pharmacotherapy and some mechanical circulatory support (MCS) therapeutic devices can provide stable hemodynamic support for CHIPs-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). LDL-C is an important pathogenic factor in atherosclerosis, and the target of blood lipid control. Recent studies have revealed that lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], which is formed when a covalent bond between apolipoprotein(a) and apolipoprotein B-100 is made, produces an LDL-like particle. This particle is an independent risk factor for the development of atherosclerosis, and is closely correlated to stent thrombosis and restenosis. Furthermore, this requires active intervention. PCSK9 inhibitors have been used in lipid-lowering treatment, and preventing atherosclerosis. The present study explores the efficacy of PCSK9 inhibitors in CHIPs-ACS, and the association between the change in Lp(a) and survival after 2 years of follow-up.

METHODS

The present real-world, prospective control study enrolled 321 CHIPs-ACS who underwent emergency PCI from August 2019 to November 2020, and these patients were followed up for 2 years. These patients were divided into two groups: PCSK9 group (n=161) given the combined PCSK9 inhibitor (140 mg of evolocumab every 2 weeks) and statins-based therapy, and SOC group (n=160) treated with statin-based lipid-lowering therapy alone. Then, the change in lipid index was measured, and the cardiovascular (CV) event recurrence rate was evaluated after one month and 2 years. Afterwards, the contribution of serum lipid parameters, especially the Lp(a) alteration, in patients with earlier initiation of the PCSK9 inhibitor to the CV outcome was analyzed.

RESULTS

The LDL-C level was significantly reduced in both groups: 52.3% in the PCSK9 group and 32.3% (P<0.001) in the SOC group. It is noteworthy that the Lp(a) level decreased by 13.2% in the PCSK9 group, but increased by 30.3% in the SOC group (P<0.001). Furthermore, the number of CV events was not significantly different between the PCSK9 and SOC groups after the 2-year follow-up period. In the PCSK9 group, the Lp(a) reduction was associated with the baseline Lp(a) levels of the patients (r2 =-0.315, P<0.001). Moreover, the decrease in Lp(a) contributed to the decline in CV events in patients who received ACS CHIPs-PCI, and the decrease in Lp(a) level was independent of the LDL-C level reduction.

CONCLUSION

The early initiation of PCSK9 inhibitors can significantly reduce the LDL-C and Lp(a) levels in ACS CHIPs-PCI. However, further studies are needed to confirm whether PCSK9 inhibitors can reduce the incidence of CV disease in CHIPs.

Effects of atorvastatin and rosuvastatin on dysfunctional coronary circulation in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVE

Evidence of therapy for dysfunctional coronary circulation in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) is limited. This study was performed to compare the effects of atorvastatin and rosuvastatin on dysfunctional coronary circulation.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 597 consecutive patients with STEMI who underwent pPCI in 3 centers from June 2016 to December 2019. Dysfunctional coronary circulation was defined by the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) grade and the TIMI myocardial perfusion grade (TMPG). Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the impact of different statin types on dysfunctional coronary circulation.

RESULTS

The incidence of TIMI no/slow reflow did not differ between the two groups, but the incidence of TMPG no/slow reflow was significantly lower in the atorvastatin than rosuvastatin group (44.58% vs. 57.69%, respectively). After multivariate adjustment, the odds ratio with 95% confidence interval of rosuvastatin was 1.72 (1.17-2.52) for after pretreatment TMPG no/slow reflow and 1.73 (1.16-2.58) for after stenting TMPG no/slow reflow. Atorvastatin and rosuvastatin showed no significant differences in clinical outcomes during hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with rosuvastatin, atorvastatin was associated with better coronary microcirculatory perfusion in patients with STEMI who underwent pPCI.

Feasibility of Short-Term Aggressive Lipid-Lowering Therapy with the PCSK9 Antibody in Acute Coronary Syndrome

BACKGROUND

The guideline-recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol target level of <70 mg/dL may not be achieved with statin administration in some patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Therefore, the proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) antibody can be added to high-risk patients with ACS. Nevertheless, the optimal duration of PCSK9 antibody administration remains unclear.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients were randomized to receive either 3 months of lipid lowering therapy (LLT) with the PCSK9 antibody followed by conventional LLT (with-PCSK9-antibody group) or 12 months of conventional LLT alone (without-PCSK9-antibody group). The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, unstable angina, and ischemia-driven revascularization. A total of 124 patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were randomly assigned to the two groups (n = 62 in each). The primary composite outcome occurred in 9.7% and 14.5% of the patients in the with- and without-PCSK9-antibody groups, respectively (hazard ratio: 0.70; 95% confidence interval: 0.25 to 1.97; p = 0.498). The two groups showed no significant differences in hospitalization for worsening heart failure and adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

In ACS patients who underwent PCI, short-term PCSK9 antibody therapy with conventional LLT was feasible in this pilot clinical trial. Long-term follow-up in a larger scale clinical trial is warranted.

ANMCO position paper on the management of hypercholesterolaemia in patients with acute coronary syndrome

Patients suffering from acute coronary syndrome (ACS) present a high risk of recurrence and new adverse cardiovascular events after hospital discharge. Elevated plasma LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels have been shown to be a causal factor for the development of coronary heart disease, and robust clinical evidence has documented that LDL-C levels decrease linearly correlates with a reduction in cardiovascular events. Recent studies have also demonstrated the safety and efficacy of an early and significant reduction in LDL-C levels in patients with ACS. In this position paper, Italian Association of Hospital Cardiologists proposes a decision algorithm on early adoption of lipid-lowering strategies at hospital discharge and short-term follow-up of patients with ACS, in the light of the multiple evidence generated in recent years on the treatment of hypercholesterolaemia and the available therapeutic options, considering current reimbursement criteria.

Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy of High-Dose Statin Loading Before Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Reducing No-Reflow Phenomenon in Acute Coronary Syndrome

Currently, guidelines recommend the uptake of high-dose statins before and after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute coronary syndrome. However, the association of high-dose statins with the incidence of the no-reflow phenomenon remains unclear. This study aimed to review the evidence of preprocedural high-dose statin therapy to reduce no-reflow incidence after PCI. PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar were searched from inception until May 2022 for studies comparing high-dose statins with low-dose or no statin therapy before PCI. Studies reporting the no-reflow phenomenon were shortlisted. The National Institutes of Health tool for randomized and cohort studies was used to assess the quality of included studies. A random-effects model was used to derive odds ratios (ORs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A total of 11 studies were included, with a population of 4,294 patients. The use of high-dose statins before PCI significantly reduced postprocedural no-reflow (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.74, p = 0.0005, I² = 32%). A total of 7 studies included patients who underwent PCI without previous use of statins. A significant decrease in overall no-reflow events was observed with high-intensity statin treatment versus low-intensity statin/placebo (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.88, p = 0.01, I² = 25%) among patients who were statin naive. Acute high-dose statin therapy before PCI significantly reduces the hazard of post-PCI no-reflow events in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Our results encourage the routine use of statins before PCI.

Statin Treatment Is Associated with Alterations in the Platelet Lipidome

BACKGROUND

 Platelets are key players in the pathophysiology of coronary artery disease (CAD) and platelet hyperreactivity leads to increased risk of developing adverse cardiovascular events. Further, significant changes in the platelet lipidome occur in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and critically regulated lipids lead to platelet hyperresponsiveness. Statin treatment is crucial in the treatment and prevention of patients with CAD by remodeling lipid metabolism.

OBJECTIVE

 In this study, we investigate the platelet lipidome of CAD patients by untargeted lipidomics, highlighting significant changes between statin-treated and naïve patients.

METHODS

 We characterized the platelet lipidome in a CAD cohort (n = 105) by an untargeted lipidomics approach using liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

 Among the annotated lipids, 41 lipids were significantly upregulated in statin-treated patients, whereas 6 lipids were downregulated compared to naïve patients. The most prominent upregulated lipids in statin-treated patients belong to the class of triglycerides, cholesteryl esters, palmitic acid, and oxidized phospholipids, whereas mainly glycerophospholipids were downregulated compared to untreated patients. A more pronounced effect of statin treatment on the platelet lipidome was observed in ACS patients. We further highlight a dose-dependent influence on the platelet lipidome.

CONCLUSION

 Our results reveal that the platelet lipidome is altered in CAD patients with statin treatment and upregulated lipids embody mainly characteristic triglycerides, whereas downregulated lipids mostly compromise glycerophospholipids, which may play a role in the pathophysiology of CAD. Results of this study may contribute to the understanding of statin treatment softening the lipid phenotype.

Advances in the available pharmacotherapy for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation

INTRODUCTION

Non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS), including non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and unstable angina, represent a leading cause of mortality worldwide, with important socio-economic consequences. NSTEMI accounts for the majority of acute coronary syndromes and usually develops on the background of a nonocclusive thrombus. We searched for relevant literature in the field in PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov as of July 2022.

AREAS COVERED

A number of pharmacotherapies are currently available for treatment and secondary prevention, mainly including antithrombotic, lipid-lowering and anti-inflammatory drugs. Pretreatment with aspirin, anticoagulant and statin therapy is of key importance in the preprocedural phase, while pretreating with an oral P2Y12 inhibitor is not routinely indicated in patients undergoing early invasive management. For patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization, pharmacotherapy essentially consists of antithrombotic drugs, which should be carefully selected. Finally, antithrombotic, lipid-lowering and anti-inflammatory drugs are important components of long-term secondary prevention after a NSTE-ACS.

EXPERT OPINION

This article reviews the evidence supporting recommendation on pharmacotherapy in patients presenting with a NSTE-ACS. Several randomized clinical trials are still ongoing and are expected to further inform scientific knowledge and clinical practice, with the final aim to improve the treatment of NSTE-ACS patients.

Reperfusion injury in acute ischemic stroke: Tackling the irony of revascularization

Reperfusion injury is an unfortunate consequence of restoring blood flow to tissue after a period of ischemia. This phenomenon can occur in any organ, although it has been best studied in cardiac cells. Based on cardiovascular studies, neuroprotective strategies have been developed. The molecular biology of reperfusion injury remains to be fully elucidated involving several mechanisms, however these mechanisms all converge on a similar final common pathway: blood brain barrier disruption. This results in an inflammatory cascade that ultimately leads to a loss of cerebral autoregulation and clinical worsening. In this article, the authors present an overview of these mechanisms and the current strategies being employed to minimize injury after restoration of blood flow to compromised cerebral territories.

Associations of pre-hospital statin treatment with in-hospital outcomes and severity of coronary artery disease in patients with first acute coronary syndrome-findings from the CCC-ACS project

Background

The current burden of dyslipidemia, the pre-hospital application of statins and the association of pre-hospital statins with the severity of coronary artery disease (CAD) and in-hospital outcomes in Chinese patients with first acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are very significant and remain unclear.

Methods

A total of 41,183 patients who underwent coronary angiography and were diagnosed with ACS for the first time from a nationwide registry study (CCC-ACS) were enrolled. The severity of CAD was assessed using the CAD prognostic index (CADPI). The patients were classified into statin and non-statin groups according to their pre-hospital statin treatment status. Clinical characteristics, CADPI and in-hospital outcomes were compared, and a logistic regression analysis was performed to determine whether pre-hospital statin therapy is associated with in-hospital outcomes and CADPI. A sensitivity analysis was used to further explore the issues above.

Results

The non-statin group had more in-hospital all-cause deaths (1.2 vs. 0.8%, P = 0.010). However, no association exists between statin pretreatment and in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) or all-cause deaths in the entire population and subgroups (all P > 0.05). Surprisingly, statin pretreatment was associated with an 8.9% higher risk of severely obstructive CAD (CADPI ≥ 37) (OR, 1.089; 95% CI, 1.010-1.175, P = 0.028), and similar results were observed in subgroups of females, those aged 50 to 75 years, and patients with hypertension.

Conclusion

Statin pretreatment was not related to MACEs or all-cause death during hospital stay, but it was associated with a higher risk of increased angiographic severity in patients with first ACS.

Interaction of Cardiovascular Nonmodifiable Risk Factors, Comorbidities and Comedications With Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury and Cardioprotection by Pharmacological Treatments and Ischemic Conditioning

Preconditioning, postconditioning, and remote conditioning of the myocardium enhance the ability of the heart to withstand a prolonged ischemia/reperfusion insult and the potential to provide novel therapeutic paradigms for cardioprotection. While many signaling pathways leading to endogenous cardioprotection have been elucidated in experimental studies over the past 30 years, no cardioprotective drug is on the market yet for that indication. One likely major reason for this failure to translate cardioprotection into patient benefit is the lack of rigorous and systematic preclinical evaluation of promising cardioprotective therapies prior to their clinical evaluation, since ischemic heart disease in humans is a complex disorder caused by or associated with cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities. These risk factors and comorbidities induce fundamental alterations in cellular signaling cascades that affect the development of ischemia/reperfusion injury and responses to cardioprotective interventions. Moreover, some of the medications used to treat these comorbidities may impact on cardioprotection by again modifying cellular signaling pathways. The aim of this article is to review the recent evidence that cardiovascular risk factors as well as comorbidities and their medications may modify the response to cardioprotective interventions. We emphasize the critical need for taking into account the presence of cardiovascular risk factors as well as comorbidities and their concomitant medications when designing preclinical studies for the identification and validation of cardioprotective drug targets and clinical studies. This will hopefully maximize the success rate of developing rational approaches to effective cardioprotective therapies for the majority of patients with multiple comorbidities. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Ischemic heart disease is a major cause of mortality; however, there are still no cardioprotective drugs on the market. Most studies on cardioprotection have been undertaken in animal models of ischemia/reperfusion in the absence of comorbidities; however, ischemic heart disease develops with other systemic disorders (e.g., hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, atherosclerosis). Here we focus on the preclinical and clinical evidence showing how these comorbidities and their routine medications affect ischemia/reperfusion injury and interfere with cardioprotective strategies.

Impact of Prior Statin Therapy on In-Hospital Outcome of STEMI Patients Treated with Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Background: Prior statin therapy has a cardioprotective effect in patients undergoing elective or urgent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, data on patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary PCI are still controversial. We retrospectively evaluated the effect of prior statin therapy on in-hospital clinical outcomes in consecutive STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI. Methods: A total of 1790 patients (mean age 67 ± 11 years, 1354 men) were included. At admission, all patients were interrogated about prior (>6 months) statin therapy. The primary endpoint of the study was the composite of in-hospital mortality, acute pulmonary edema, and cardiogenic shock in patients with or without prior statin therapy. Results: A total of 427 patients (24%) were on prior statin therapy. The incidence of the primary endpoint was similar in patients with or without prior statin therapy (15% vs. 16%; p = 0.38). However, at multivariate analysis, prior statin therapy was associated with a lower risk of the primary endpoint, after adjustment for major prognostic predictors (odds ratio 0.61 [95% CI 0.39−0.96]; p = 0.03). Conclusions: This study demonstrated that prior statin therapy is associated with a better in-hospital clinical outcome in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI compared to those without prior statin therapy.

Comparison of the Treatment Efficacy of Rosuvastatin versus Atorvastatin Loading Prior to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of a single high-dose rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin preloading in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients receiving primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI.) Methods: A total of 99 patients presented with STEMI and were randomly divided into three groups—a control group (n = 33) with no statin treatment, an atorvastatin group (n = 33) with a single 80 mg atorvastatin dose and the rosuvastatin group (n = 33) with a single 40 mg rosuvastatin dose in the emergency room (ER) prior to PCI. Post-interventional thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade and corrected TIMI frame count (CTFC) were recorded, and ST-segment resolution was measured. Results: CTFC was significantly lower for the atorvastatin group (p-value < 0.01) than in the control group. A final TIMI flow grade 3 was achieved in 32 (97.0%) patients in the rosuvastatin group and 28 (84.8%) patients in the atorvastatin group compared with only 25 (75.8%) patients in the control group (p = 0.014). Peak CK-MB in the rosuvastatin group (263.2 [207.2−315.6]) and the atorvastatin group (208 [151.0−314.1]) was lower compared to that in the control group (398.4 [303.9−459.3]); p < 0.001. Conclusions: A single extensive dose of lipophilic atorvastatin prior to primary PCI in STEMI patients showed better improvement in microvascular myocardial perfusion compared to hydrophilic rosuvastatin.

Statins in High Cardiovascular Risk Patients: Do Comorbidities and Characteristics Matter?

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) morbidity and mortality are decreasing in high-income countries, but ASCVD remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in high-income countries. Over the past few decades, major risk factors for ASCVD, including LDL cholesterol (LDL-C), have been identified. Statins are the drug of choice for patients at increased risk of ASCVD and remain one of the most commonly used and effective drugs for reducing LDL cholesterol and the risk of mortality and coronary artery disease in high-risk groups. Unfortunately, doctors tend to under-prescribe or under-dose these drugs, mostly out of fear of side effects. The latest guidelines emphasize that treatment intensity should increase with increasing cardiovascular risk and that the decision to initiate intervention remains a matter of individual consideration and shared decision-making. The purpose of this review was to analyze the indications for initiation or continuation of statin therapy in different categories of patient with high cardiovascular risk, considering their complexity and comorbidities in order to personalize treatment.

The prevalence of hyperlipidemia and features of lipid-lowering therapy in patients with myocardial infarction according to the Russian register of acute myocardial infarction REGION-MI

Aim      To study the prevalence of hyperlipidemia in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) in the Russian Federation; to assess the compliance with clinical practice guidelines of the lipid-lowering therapy prescribed upon discharge from the hospital; and to determine the number of patients who are indicated for the combination lipid-lowering therapy to achieve the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal.Material and methods  REGION-MI is Russian rEGIstry Of acute myocardial iNfarction, a multicenter, retrospective and prospective observational study. The observation period was divided into 3 stages: observation during the stay in the hospital and at 6 and 12 months after the inclusion in the registry. Plasma total cholesterol (TC) and LDL-C were measured in all patients on admission. Evaluation of the prescribed lipid-lowering therapy included the intensity of the treatment.Results The study included 3 620 patients; 62.4 of them had hyperlipidemia on admission. Mean TC on admission was 5.29 mmol/l and LDl-C level was 3.35 mmol/l. Upon discharge, 95.4% of patients after myocardial infarction continued on or were prescribed statin therapy; ezetimibe was prescribed to 1.22% of patients. Patients with an extremely high level of LDL-C &gt;5 mmol/l accounted for 10.7% of patients with hyperlipidemia. The target level of LDL-C ≤1.4 mmol/l cannot be achieved with the statin and ezetimibe combination therapy in these patients; drugs from the group of PCSK9 inhibitors are indicated for them.Conclusion      According to the data of the Russian registry of acute myocardial infarction, REGION-MI, a high incidence of hyperlipidemia is observed in patients with acute MI. Despite multiple studies that have proven the importance of achieving a low LDL-C level and good tolerance and safety of ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitors, the prescription frequency of combination therapy remains unreasonably low. Results of a simulation study that was conducted in Sweden and the data of the REGION-MI registry showed that PCSK9 inhibitors as a part of the combination therapy are indicated for many patients. The combination therapy is presently the most powerful type of lipid-lowering treatment that allows, in most cases, achievement of the LDL-C goal.

Endovascular Treatment of Large Vessel Occlusion Strokes Due to Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease

Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has become the gold-standard for patients with acute large vessel occlusion strokes (LVOS). MT is highly effective in the treatment of embolic occlusions; however, underlying intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) represents a therapeutic challenge, often requiring pharmacological and/or mechanical rescue treatment. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors have been suggested as the best initial approach, if reperfusion can be achieved after thrombectomy, with angioplasty and/or stenting being reserved for the more refractory cases. In this review, we focus on the therapeutic considerations surrounding the endovascular treatment of ICAD-related acute LVOS.

Effect of Statins on Serum level of hs-CRP and CRP in Patients with Cardiovascular Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background. Several studies have reported that statins have anti-inflammatory effects. Nevertheless, results of clinical trials concerning the effect of statins on the levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) and high-sensitivity CRP (hs-CRP) have been inconsistent. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating the effect of statins on CRP and hs-CRP levels in patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Methods. Literature search of the major databases was performed to find eligible RCTs assessing the effect of statins on serum levels of CRP and hs-CRP from the inception until the last week of April 2021. The effect sizes were determined for weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results. 26 studies were identified (3010 patients and 2968 controls) for hs-CRP and 20 studies (3026 patients and 2968 controls) for CRP. Statins reduced the serum levels of hs-CRP ( $\text{WMD}=-0.97\text{mg}/\text{L}$ ; 95% CI: -1.26 to -0.68 mg/L; $P<0.001$ ) and CRP ( $\text{WMD}=-3.05\text{mg}/\text{L}$ ; 95% CI: -4.86 to -1.25 mg/L; $P<0.001$ ) in patients with CVDs. Statins decreased the serum levels of hs-CRP in patients receiving both high-intensity and moderate/low-intensity treatments with these drugs. In addition, the duration of treatment longer than 10 weeks decreased hs-CRP levels. Only high-intensity statin treatment could marginally decrease serum levels of CRP in CVDs patients. Conclusions. This meta-analysis showed the efficacy of statins to reduce the concentrations of CRP and hs-CRP in patients with different types of CVDs.

Effects of Shen-Yuan-Dan on Periprocedural Myocardial Injury and the Number of Peripheral Blood Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Patients with Unstable Angina Pectoris Undergoing Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to investigate the effects of Shen-Yuan-Dan (SYD), a Chinese medicine preparation, on periprocedural myocardial injury (PMI) and the number of peripheral blood endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) in patients with unstable angina pectoris (UA) who underwent elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

Patients were randomly divided into the experimental (group A) and control (group B) groups through the random number table method. In group A, patients concurrently received the conventional western treatment and SYD orally (4 capsules/time, 3 times/d, from 3 d before surgery to 7 d after surgery). In group B, patients received conventional Western medicine treatment. Both groups underwent coronary angiography, and patients undergoing PCI were eventually included in the study. The following patient data were collected: incidence of PMI, serum CK-MB content before PCI, 4 h, 24 h, and 7 d after PCI, number of CD45dim/-CD34+CD309+ peripheral venous EPCs, and number of CD184 coexpressed EPCs. The incidence of adverse reactions and 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) were also recorded.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients were finally included in this study, with 32 and 30 in groups A and B, respectively. In group A, the number of peripheral blood EPCs and the number of CD184 coexpressed EPCs at 1 h before surgery were higher than those at 3 d before surgery (37.24 ± 25.20 vs. 22.78 ± 9.60/ml; P < 0.001 and 23.38 ± 15.30 vs. 13.54 ± 8.08/ml; P < 0.001, resp.). The number of peripheral blood EPCs and number of CD184 coexpressed EPCs at 4 h after surgery were lower than those at 1 h before surgery (25.30 ± 11.90 vs. 37.24 ± 25.20/ml; P=0.019 and 15.38 ± 8.78 vs. 23.38 ± 15.30/ml; P=0.013, resp.), but there was no difference at 24 h and at 7 d after surgery in comparison with that at 1 h before surgery (P > 0.05). In group B, compared with that at 1 h before surgery, there existed a decline in the number of EPCs in peripheral blood and the number of CD184 coexpressed EPCs at 4 h after surgery, but without a statistical difference (P > 0.05). Comparing both groups, it was found that the incidence of PMI in group A was lower (6.25% vs. 26.67%; P=0.04), and the serum CK-MB content at 4 and 24 h after surgery was also lower than that in group B (17.33 ± 5.83 vs. 20.38 ± 4.32 U/l; P=0.048 and 15.79 ± 5.32 vs. 19.10 ± 4.93 U/l; P=0.030, resp.). The number of EPCs in peripheral blood and the number of CD184 coexpressed EPCs in group A were higher than those in group B at 1 h before surgery (37.24 ± 25.20 vs. 22.36 ± 12.26/ml; P=0.034 and 23.38 ± 15.30 vs. 13.12 ± 14.62/ml; P=0.013, resp.). In addition, there were no obvious adverse reactions and no 30-day MACEs in both groups during the trial.

CONCLUSION

SYD can reduce PMI and promote the mobilization of EPCs in the perioperative period of elective PCI in patients with UA.

A fresh look at coronary microembolization

Mechanical stress from haemodynamic perturbations or interventional manipulation of epicardial coronary atherosclerotic plaques with inflammatory destabilization can release particulate debris, thrombotic material and soluble substances into the coronary circulation. The physical material obstructs the coronary microcirculation, whereas the soluble substances induce endothelial dysfunction and facilitate vasoconstriction. Coronary microvascular obstruction and dysfunction result in patchy microinfarcts accompanied by an inflammatory reaction, both of which contribute to progressive myocardial contractile dysfunction. In clinical studies, the benefit of protection devices to retrieve atherothrombotic debris during percutaneous coronary interventions has been modest, and the treatment of microembolization has mostly relied on antiplatelet and vasodilator agents. The past 25 years have witnessed a relative proportional increase in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the presentation of acute coronary syndromes. An associated increase in the incidence of plaque erosion rather than rupture has also been recognized as a key mechanism in the past decade. We propose that coronary microembolization is a decisive link between plaque erosion at the culprit lesion and the manifestation of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. In this Review, we characterize the features and mechanisms of coronary microembolization and discuss the clinical trials of drugs and devices for prevention and treatment.

Efficacy of high-dose atorvastatin or rosuvastatin loading in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with GRADE qualification of available evidence

PURPOSE

We aimed to summarize current evidence regarding the impact of a high-dose statin loading before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on short-term outcomes in patients presenting with the acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

METHODS

This meta-analysis was based on a search of the MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid Journals, and SCOPUS for randomized controlled trials that compared high-dose atorvastatin or rosuvastatin with no or low-dose statin administered before planned PCI in statin-naive patients with ACS. The primary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), myocardial infarction (MI), and all-cause mortality at 30 days. Prespecified subanalyses were performed with respect to statin and ACS type.

RESULTS

A total of eleven trials enrolling 6291 patients were included, of which 75.4% received PCI. High-dose statin loading was associated with an overall 43% relative risk (RR) reduction in MACCE at 30 days (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.41-0.77) in whole ACS population. This effect was primarily driven by the 39% reduction in the occurrence of MI (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.46-0.80). No significant effect on all-cause mortality reduction was observed (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.67-1.26). In the setting of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), atorvastatin loading was associated with a 33% reduction in MACCE (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.48-0.94), while in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction ACS (NSTE-ACS), rosuvastatin loading was associated with 52% reduction in MACCE at 30 days (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.34-0.66). The level of evidence as qualified with GRADE was low to high, depending on the outcome.

CONCLUSION

A high-dose loading of statins before PCI in patients with ACS reduces MACCE and reduces the risk of MI with no impact on mortality at 30 days. Atorvastatin reduces MACCE in STEMI while rosuvastatin reduces MACCE in NSTE-ACS at 30 days.

Macrophage targeted theranostic strategy for accurate detection and rapid stabilization of the inflamed high-risk plaque

Rationale: Inflammation plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of the acute coronary syndrome. Detecting plaques with high inflammatory activity and specifically treating those lesions can be crucial to prevent life-threatening cardiovascular events. Methods: Here, we developed a macrophage mannose receptor (MMR)-targeted theranostic nanodrug (mannose-polyethylene glycol-glycol chitosan-deoxycholic acid-cyanine 7-lobeglitazone; MMR-Lobe-Cy) designed to identify inflammatory activity as well as to deliver peroxisome proliferator-activated gamma (PPARγ) agonist, lobeglitazone, specifically to high-risk plaques based on the high mannose receptor specificity. The MMR-Lobe-Cy was intravenously injected into balloon-injured atheromatous rabbits and serial in vivo optical coherence tomography (OCT)-near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) structural-molecular imaging was performed. Results: One week after MMR-Lobe-Cy administration, the inflammatory NIRF signals in the plaques notably decreased compared to the baseline whereas the signals in saline controls even increased over time. In accordance with in vivo imaging findings, ex vivo NIRF signals on fluorescence reflectance imaging (FRI) and plaque inflammation by immunostainings significantly decreased compared to oral lobeglitazone group or saline controls. The anti-inflammatory effect of MMR-Lobe-Cy was mediated by inhibition of TLR4/NF-κB pathway. Furthermore, acute resolution of inflammation altered the inflamed plaque into a stable phenotype with less macrophages and collagen-rich matrix. Conclusion: Macrophage targeted PPARγ activator labeled with NIRF rapidly stabilized the inflamed plaques in coronary sized artery, which could be quantitatively assessed using intravascular OCT-NIRF imaging. This novel theranostic approach provides a promising theranostic strategy for high-risk coronary plaques.

SUPPORT-1 (Subjects Undergoing PCI and Perioperative Reperfusion Treatment): A Prospective, Randomized Trial of CMX-2043 in Patients Undergoing Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

OBJECTIVE

The natural molecule α-lipoic acid has been shown to be partially cytoprotective through antioxidant and antiapoptotic mechanisms. To obtain an initial assessment of the safety and potential efficacy of a synthetic derivative, CMX-2043, in preventing ischemic complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) we conducted the Subjects Undergoing PCI and Perioperative Reperfusion Treatment (SUPPORT-1) trial, the first patient experience with this agent.

METHODS AND RESULTS

SUPPORT-1 was a phase 2a, 6-center, international, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind trial. A total of 142 patients were randomized to receive a single intravenous bolus dose of drug or placebo administered 15-60 minutes before PCI. Cardiac biomarker assessments included serial measurements of creatine kinase myocardial band (CK-MB) at 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours after PCI and a single measurement of troponin T (TnT) at 24 hours. Peak concentrations of CK-MB and TnT were significantly reduced in the 2.4 mg/kg group compared with placebo (P = 0.05 and 0.03, respectively). No subject administered 2.4 mg/kg of CMX-2043 had an increase of CK-MB to ≥3X upper limit of normal versus 16% for placebo (P = 0.02); 16% of the 2.4-mg/kg dose group developed an elevation of TnT to ≥3X upper limit of normal versus 39% in the placebo group (P = 0.05). No drug-related serious adverse events were observed in any group.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that CMX-2043 may reduce PCI periprocedural myonecrosis and support further clinical evaluation of this novel agent for its potential cytoprotective effects.

Colchicine administration for percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

INTRODUCTION

The efficacy of colchicine administration in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains controversial. We conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the influence of colchicine administration versus placebo on treatment efficacy for PCI.

METHODS

We search PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases through June 2020 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of colchicine administration versus placebo in patients with PCI. This meta-analysis is performed using the random-effect model.

RESULTS

Five RCTs involving 5526 patients are included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with control group for myocardial infarction patients undergoing PCI, colchicine intervention can significantly reduce major adverse cardiovascular events (OR = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.62 to 0.97; P = 0.02), but reveals no obvious impact on mortality (OR = 0.89; 95% CI = 0.60 to 1.32; P = 0.57), myocardial infarction (OR = 0.88; 95% CI = 0.67 to 1.17; P = 0.39), serious adverse events (OR = 0.71; 95% CI = 0.31 to 1.61; P = 0.41), or restenosis (OR = 1.02; 95% CI = 0.63 to 1.64; P = 0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

Colchicine treatment may be effective to reduce major adverse cardiovascular events in patients undergoing PCI.

Statin reload before off-pump coronary artery bypass graft: Effect on biomarker release kinetics

Objectives

Statins confer protection from ischemia/reperfusion through various pathways including pleiotropic mechanisms. Following chronic administration, activation of intrinsic cellular mechanisms causes attenuation of these pleiotropic effects.

Methods

Since coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) represents a reversible ischemia-reperfusion sequence, we assessed if statin reload is effective in patients undergoing off-pump CABG (n = 100) in limiting myocardial injury. Patients received loading dose of rosuvastatin (40 mg initiated 7 days before surgery) while nonloaded patients continued whatever statin dose they were receiving and served as controls. Cardiac biomarkers (Troponin-I, creatine kinase muscle/brain [CK-MB], and B-type natriuretic peptide [BNP]) were measured at 8, 24, and 48 h postoperatively. The primary end-point was the extent of perioperative myocardial injury (area under the curve [AUC]: AUC of each biomarker).

Results

Despite similar baseline levels, all biomarkers at 8, 24, and 48 h were significantly lower in the loaded group. The AUC for each biomarker was also significantly lower in the loaded group (cTnI 37.96 vs. 70.12 ng. hr/ml, CK-MB 229.64 vs. 347.04 ng. hr/ml, and BNP 5257.56 vs. 15606.68 pg. hr/ml, all P < 0.001). Delta cTnI (change from baseline to peak level) (1.00 ± 1.34 vs. 2.25 ± 2.59), delta CK-MB (4.54 ± 5.89 vs. 10.68 ± 9.95), and delta BNP (120.41 ± 172.48 vs. 449.23 ± 790.95) all P < 0.001 were also significantly lower in the loaded group. Those loaded with rosuvastatin had lower inotrope duration (22.9 ± 23.33 vs. 31.26 ± 25.39 h, P = 0.04) and ventilator support time (16.94 ± 6.78 vs. 23.8 ± 20.53 h, P = 0.03).

Conclusion

In patients undergoing off-pump CABG, statin reload can "recapture" cardioprotection in patients already on statins with favorable effect on release kinetics of biomarkers and postoperative outcomes.

Impact of the Polymorphism rs5751876 of the Purinergic Receptor ADORA2A on Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Aim: Periprocedural myocardial infarction (PMI), a severe complication of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) procedures, has a negative prognostic effect, both at short and long-term follow-up. So far, adenosine's role in preventing PMI has shown contrasting results. A genetic variant of ADORA2A receptor, 1976 C > T, has been suggested as a potential determinant of the interindividual response to adenosine, thus conditioning its potential benefits on PMI. In our study, we investigated whether the ADORA2A 1976 C > T polymorphism is associated with PMI occurrence in patients undergoing coronary stenting.

Methods: The study included consecutive patients undergoing PCI at the Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria “Maggiore della Carità,” Novara, Italy, between January 2010 and January 2016. Their genetic status was assessed using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and restriction-fragment-length-polymorphism technique. Myonecrosis biomarkers were measured at intervals from 6 to 48 hours. PMI was defined as CKMB increased 3 times over the Upper Limit of Normal (ULN), or 50% of pre-PCI value; periprocedural myonecrosis was defined as troponin I increased 3 times over the ULN or by 50% of the baseline value.

Results: We included 1,104 patients undergoing PCI, 863 (78.2%) of whom carried the ADORA2A T-allele. No difference was found for the main demographic, clinical features, or biochemistry parameters. However, C-carriers had lower statin therapy use (p = 0.008) and lower HDL-cholesterol levels (p = 0.01). Homozygous C/C patients had more frequent multivessel disease (p = 0.03), longer lesions (p = 0.01) and Type C lesions (p = 0.01), thus requiring more complex procedures. After correction for baseline confounding factors at multivariate analysis, there was no difference in myocardial necrosis according to the ADORA2A genotype (p = 0.40). In contrast, PMI tended to increase in the homozygous C/C population (p = 0.06), but this trend was attenuated at multivariate analysis after correction for baseline confounding factors (C/C: OR[95%CI]= 1.52 [0.88–2.6], p = 0.14).

Conclusions: Our study showed that the polymorphism rs5751876 of the ADORA2A receptor is associated with a higher prevalence of complex coronary lesions and multivessel disease. However, it does not significantly influence the occurrence of periprocedural MI or myonecrosis.

Role of Lipid-Lowering Therapy in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Goal Attainment: Focus on Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome

Dyslipidemia is a major risk factor for cardiovascular (CV) disease, which is the leading cause of death globally. Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a common cause of death, accounting for nearly half of the global burden of CV mortality. Epidemiologic studies have identified low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) as an independent CV risk factor, and this is now the primary target for initiating and adjusting lipid-lowering therapies in most current guidelines. Evidence from pivotal studies supports the use of high-intensity statin therapy and a lower level for optimal LDL-C in secondary prevention of atherosclerotic CV disease, especially in patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. However, current research has identified a gap between the target LDL-C goal attainment and target LDL-C levels recommended by the guidelines. Statins have proven benefits in the management of CV disease and are the cornerstone of lipid-lowering management in patients with ACS. Recent randomized controlled trials have also demonstrated the benefits of cholesterol absorption inhibitors and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors. This review summarizes the current evidence for LDL-lowering therapy in patients with ACS, with an emphasis on the importance of LDL-C goal attainment, rapid LDL-C lowering, and duration of LDL-C-lowering therapy.

Comparison of Atorvastatin and Rosuvastatin in Reduction of Inflammatory Markers in Acute Coronary Syndrome

Introduction: Patients suffering from acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are found to have elevated levels of inflammatory markers such as high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) in their blood. These elevated inflammatory markers can lead to complications in ACS. Statins such as atorvastatin and rosuvastatin are known to reduce inflammatory markers. Our aim is to compare the efficacy of atorvastatin and rosuvastatin in reducing inflammatory markers.

Methods: This prospective, open-label, randomized trial was conducted in the cardiovascular department of tertiary care in a rural area of Pakistan. There were 128 patients diagnosed with ACS who were enrolled in the study. They were randomized into two groups, i.e. group A in which patients received 40 mg rosuvastatin daily and group B in which patients received 20 mg atorvastatin daily. hsCRP and ESR were recorded for all the patients at baseline (before starting therapy) and then again after four weeks. The results were compared between both groups.

Result: Out of 128 patients, 113 (88.2%) patients completed the study. According to this study, at the end of four weeks, rosuvastatin reduced hsCRP (p value: < 0.0001) and ESR (p value: 0.015) values significantly more when compared with atorvastatin.

Conclusion: In this study, rosuvastatin was significantly superior to atorvastatin in reducing inflammatory markers such as ESR and hsCRP in patients suffering from ACS. Cardiologists should consider using rosuvastatin rather than atorvastatin in management of patients suffering from ACS with elevated inflammatory biomarkers. 

Efficacy of Sodium Tanshinone IIA Sulfonate in Patients with Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Results from a Multicentre, Controlled, Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate (STS) has been widely used by Chinese medicine practitioners for chronic cardiovascular diseases. However, its direct clinical efficacy in patients with acute coronary syndrome following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has not been reported yet. The present trial aimed to investigate potential cardioprotection of STS in patients undergoing PCI for non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS).

METHODS

In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 372 patients with NSTE-ACS were randomly assigned to receive STS (n = 192) or saline (n = 180) for 2 days before and 3 days after PCI along with standard therapy. The primary endpoint was the composite incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), including death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, repeated revascularization of the target vessel, and stent thrombosis, within 30 days after PCI.

RESULTS

The 30-day MACEs occurred in 18.8% of the patients in the STS group and in 27.2% of the patients in the control group (P = 0.038); this difference was mostly driven by reduction of myocardial infarction incidence (17.2% vs. 26.7%, P = 0.027). Post-procedural elevation of troponin-I was also significantly lower in the STS group (26.56% vs. 47.78%, P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis identified STS as a predictor of decreased risk of MACE occurrence (odds ratio: 0.60, 95% confidence interval: 0.36 to 0.99; P = 0.045).

CONCLUSION

Addition of STS to the standard treatments recommended by the current practice guidelines in patients with NSTE-ACS undergoing PCI could reduce myocardial injury and the occurrence of short-term cardiovascular events, primarily driven by non-fatal myocardial infarction.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR-TRC-14005182.

Adverse clinical outcomes in patients undergoing both PCI and TAVR: Analysis from a pooled multi-center registry

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of data regarding the optimum timing of PCI in relation to TAVR.

OBJECTIVE

We compared the major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) rates among patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) before transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with those who received PCI with/after TAVR.

METHODS

In this multicenter study, we pooled all consecutive patients who underwent TAVR at three high volume centers.

RESULTS

Among 3,982 patients who underwent TAVR, 327 (8%) patients underwent PCI within 1 year before TAVR, 38 (1%) had PCI the same day as TAVR and 15 (0.5%) had PCI within 2 months after TAVR. Overall, among patients who received both PCI and TAVR (n = 380), history of previous CABG (HR:0.501; p = .001), higher BMI at TAVR (HR:0.970; p = .038), and statin therapy after TAVR (HR:0.660, p = .037) were independently associated with lower MACCE while warfarin therapy after TAVR was associated with a higher risk of MACCE (HR:1.779, p = .017). Patients who received PCI within 1 year before TAVR had similar baseline demographics, STS scores, clinical risk factors when compared to patients receiving PCI with/after TAVR. Both groups were similar in PCI (Syntax Score, ACC/AHA lesion class) and TAVR (valve types, access) related variables. There were no significant differences in terms of MACCE (log rank p = .550), all-cause mortality (log rank p = .433), strokes (log rank p = .153), and repeat PCI (log rank p = .054) in patients who underwent PCI with/after TAVR when compared to patients who received PCI before TAVR.

CONCLUSION

Among patients who underwent both PCI and TAVR, history of CABG, higher BMI, and statin therapy had lower, while those discharged on warfarin, had higher adverse event rates. Adverse events rates were similar regardless of timing of PCI.

Impact of Targeted Therapies for Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction as Assessed by the Index of Microcirculatory Resistance

Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) has emerged as an important therapeutic target in the contemporary management of ischemic heart disease. However, due to a lack of a reliable traditional "gold standard" test for CMD, optimal treatment remains undefined. The index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) is an intra-coronary wire-based technique that provides a more reliable and quantitative assessment of CMD and has been increasingly used as a preferred endpoint for evaluating CMD treatment strategies in recent studies. IMR can help diagnose CMD in angina patients with non-obstructive epicardial coronary disease, predict peri-procedural myocardial infarction in stable patients undergoing coronary stenting, and predict long-term prognosis after acute myocardial infarction. Studies of IMR in the setting of non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes are still lacking. This review critically appraises the current published literature evaluating targeted therapies for CMD using IMR as the assessment tool and provides insights into evidence gaps in this important field. The index of microcirculatory resistance has rapidly evolved from a research tool to being the new "gold standard" test for evaluating coronary microvascular dysfunction.

Effects on Suxiao Jiuxin Pills in the Treatment of Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Early Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Multicenter Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial

Objectives: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is an acute disease with high mortality. Although early percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is proved to be the practical approach in treating ACS, the incidence of cardiovascular events is still far from satisfactory. The combination of Suxiao Jiuxin Pill (SJP) and Western medicine is one conventional approach in the treatment of ACS. Many elementary and clinical trials have proved the efficacy and safety in the improvement of cardiocerebral vascular conditions. The aim of this project is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of SJP on ACS with early PCI patients. Trial Design: This is a multicenter randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Trial registration: ChiCTR-TRC-13003053. Settings: Hospitals. Subjects: A total of 200 ACS with early PCI patients were randomly divided into SJP group (n = 100) and placebo group (n = 100). Interventions: The SJP group was treated with routine treatment and SJP (taking eight SJP pills orally each time, three times per day). The placebo group was treated with routine treatment along with equal amounts of SJP placebo. The course of treatment was 6 months and a follow-up visit at 12 months. Outcome Measures: Assessments of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), safety assessments, adverse events, left ventricular systolic function (LVEF), Seattle angina questionnaire (SAQ), troponin C (cTNI), C-reactive protein (CRP), fibrinogen (Fib), and cystatin C (cysC). Results: The SJP group had a relatively low incidence of MACE than the placebo (p < 0.05, odds ratio: 1.916, 95% confidence interval [0.999-3.674]). LVEF was significantly higher in the SJP group than the placebo group on the 360-day follow-up (p < 0.01). SJP had a significant increase score in the SAQ subscale of physical limitation, angina frequency, and treatment satisfaction (p < 0.05). There is no significant difference in the cTNI and CRP level between the two groups. The serum concentration of Fib and cysC in the SJP was significantly decreased compared with the placebo (p < 0.05). The numbers of adverse events between the two groups were not statistically different (p > 0.05). Conclusions: SJP is associated with a reduction in MACE, and an improvement of heart function and quality of life in ACS patients with early PCI, and is probably safe to use.

Effect of high-intensity statin preloading on TIMI flow in patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention

Background

Acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has improved the outcomes from STEMI and improved myocardial perfusion. However, there is still room for medical therapy to help perfuse the myocardium. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of high-intensity statins used prior to primary PCI in patients presenting with acute STEMI on myocardial perfusion. The study included 170 patients who presented with acute STEMI to Ain Shams University Hospitals and underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). They were divided into two groups where the first group received high-intensity statins (80 mg of atorvastatin or 20 mg of rosuvastatin) besides guideline-recommended therapy before primary PCI and the second group served as a control group and received guideline-recommended therapy, and high-intensity statins were given as usual after going back to the coronary care unit after primary PCI. Post-interventional thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade and myocardial blush grade (MBG) were recorded, and ST-segment resolution was measured.

Results

The LAD was the culprit vessel for the majority of patients in both groups. In the control group, there were 4 patients with TIMI I flow and MBG I, 13 with TIMI II flow and MBG II, and 68 with TIMI III flow and MBG III. Meanwhile, in the cases group, there was 1 patient with TIMI I flow and MBG I, 3 with TIMI II flow and MBG II, and 81 with TIMI III flow and MBG III. This difference was statistically significant with a P value of 0.010. There were 34 patients in the cases group who showed complete ST-segment resolution (40%) vs. 19 patients (22.4%) in the control group which was statistically significant with a P value of 0.013. In addition, ejection fraction had values of mean ± SD of 45.91 ± 5.49 in the cases group vs. 43.01 ± 8.80 in the control group which was statistically significant with a P value of 0.011.

Conclusion

High-intensity statin loading before primary PCI resulted in improved post-procedural TIMI flow, MBG, complete ST-segment resolution, and ejection fraction.