Risk Factors for Malignant Ventricular Arrhythmias in Lamin A/C Mutation Carriers

Pathophysiology of dilated cardiomyopathy: from mechanisms to precision medicine

Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a complex disease with multiple causes and various pathogenic mechanisms. Despite improvements in the prognosis of patients with DCM in the past decade, this condition remains a leading cause of heart failure and premature death. Conventional treatment for DCM is based on the foundational therapies for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. However, increasingly, attention is being directed towards individualized treatments and precision medicine. The ability to confirm genetic causality is gradually being complemented by an increased understanding of genotype-phenotype correlations. Non-genetic factors also influence the onset of DCM, and growing evidence links genetic background with concomitant non-genetic triggers or precipitating factors, increasing the extreme complexity of the pathophysiology of DCM. This Review covers the spectrum of pathophysiological mechanisms in DCM, from monogenic causes to the coexistence of genetic abnormalities and triggering environmental factors (the 'two-hit' hypothesis). The roles of common genetic variants in the general population and of gene modifiers in disease onset and progression are also discussed. Finally, areas for future research are highlighted, particularly novel therapies, such as small molecules, RNA and gene therapy, and measures for the prevention of arrhythmic death.

Prognostic implications of genotype findings in non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy: A network meta-analysis

AIMS

Evidence on the relative impact of diverse genetic backgrounds associated with non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) remains contradictory. This study sought to synthesize the available data regarding long-term outcomes of different gene groups in DCM.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Electronic databases were systematically screened to identify studies reporting prognostic data on pre-specified gene groups. Those included pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants, truncating titin variants (TTNtv), lamin A/C variants (LMNA), and desmosomal proteins. Outcomes were divided into composite adverse events (CAEs), malignant ventricular arrhythmic events (MVAEs) and heart failure events (HFEs). A total of 26 studies (n = 7255) were included in the meta-analysis and 6791 patients with genotyped DCM were analysed. Patients with P/LP variants had a higher risk for CAEs (odds ratio [OR] 2.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.67-2.65), MVAEs (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.52-2.26), and HFEs (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.08-3.73) than genotype-negative patients. The presence of TTNtv was linked to a higher risk for CAEs (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.20-2.63), but not MVAEs or HFEs. LMNA and desmosomal groups suffered a higher risk for CAEs, MVAEs, and HFEs compared to non-LMNA and non-desmosomal groups, respectively. When genes were indirectly compared, the presence of LMNA resulted in a more detrimental effect that TTNtv, with respect to all composite outcomes but no significant difference was found between LMNA and desmosomal genes. Desmosomal genes harboured a higher risk for MVAEs compared to TTNtv.

CONCLUSIONS

Different genetic substrates associated with DCM result in divergent natural histories. Routine utilization of genetic testing should be employed to refine risk stratification and inform therapeutic strategies in DCM.

The Uncertain Benefit from Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators in Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy: How to Guide Clinical Decision-Making?

Life-threatening dysrhythmias remain a significant cause of mortality in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM). Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) effectively reduce mortality in patients who have survived a life-threatening arrhythmic event. The evidence for survival benefit of primary prevention ICD for patients with high-risk NICM on guideline-directed medical therapy is not as robust, with efficacy questioned by recent studies. In this review, we summarize the data on the risk of life-threatening arrhythmias in NICM, the recommendations, and the evidence supporting the efficacy of primary prevention ICD, and highlight tools that may improve the identification of patients who could benefit from primary prevention ICD implantation.

Risk Stratification in Nonischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy Using CMR Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Importance

Accurate risk stratification of nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NIDCM) remains challenging.

Objective

To evaluate the association of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging-derived measurements with clinical outcomes in NIDCM.

Data Sources

MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science Core Collection databases were systematically searched for articles from January 2005 to April 2023.

Study Selection

Prospective and retrospective nonrandomized diagnostic studies reporting on the association between CMR imaging-derived measurements and adverse clinical outcomes in NIDCM were deemed eligible.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Prespecified items related to patient population, CMR imaging measurements, and clinical outcomes were extracted at the study level by 2 independent reviewers. Random-effects models were fitted using restricted maximum likelihood estimation and the method of Hartung, Knapp, Sidik, and Jonkman.

Main Outcomes and Measures

All-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, arrhythmic events, heart failure events, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE).

Results

A total of 103 studies including 29 687 patients with NIDCM were analyzed. Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) presence and extent (per 1%) were associated with higher all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.81 [95% CI, 1.60-2.04]; P < .001 and HR, 1.07 [95% CI, 1.02-1.12]; P = .02, respectively), cardiovascular mortality (HR, 2.43 [95% CI, 2.13-2.78]; P < .001 and HR, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.07-1.24]; P = .01), arrhythmic events (HR, 2.69 [95% CI, 2.20-3.30]; P < .001 and HR, 1.07 [95% CI, 1.03-1.12]; P = .004) and heart failure events (HR, 1.98 [95% CI, 1.73-2.27]; P < .001 and HR, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.01-1.10]; P = .02). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (per 1%) was not associated with all-cause mortality (HR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.97-1.02]; P = .47), cardiovascular mortality (HR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.94-1.00]; P = .05), or arrhythmic outcomes (HR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.97-1.01]; P = .34). Lower risks for heart failure events (HR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.95-0.98]; P = .002) and MACE (HR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.96-0.99]; P < .001) were observed with higher LVEF. Higher native T1 relaxation times (per 10 ms) were associated with arrhythmic events (HR, 1.07 [95% CI, 1.01-1.14]; P = .04) and MACE (HR, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.01-1.11]; P = .03). Global longitudinal strain (GLS) (per 1%) was not associated with heart failure events (HR, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.95-1.18]; P = .15) or MACE (HR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.94-1.14]; P = .43). Limited data precluded definitive analysis for native T1 relaxation times, GLS, and extracellular volume fraction (ECV) with respect to mortality outcomes.

Conclusion

The presence and extent of LGE were associated with various adverse clinical outcomes, whereas LVEF was not significantly associated with mortality and arrhythmic end points in NIDCM. Risk stratification using native T1 relaxation times, extracellular volume fraction, and global longitudinal strain requires further evaluation.

Cardiomyopathy with an LMNA Genetic Variant Affecting Three Consecutive Generations: A Case Series

We report the case of a family afflicted with cardiac laminopathy who showed atrial fibrillation (AF) and complete atrioventricular block across three generations. Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) implantation, or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) were delivered to the three patients (proband; 61 years old, proband's mother: 84 years old, and proband's daughter; 38 years old) to prevent sudden cardiac death or suppress heart failure progression. A novel frameshift mutation (LMNA Exon 9: c.1550dupA;p. N518Efs*34) was found in all three cases through genetic testing, and this mutation may potentially result in the relatively late appearance of a phenotype of left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

Genetic testing in early-onset atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a globally prevalent cardiac arrhythmia with significant genetic underpinnings, as highlighted by recent large-scale genetic studies. A prominent clinical and genetic overlap exists between AF, heritable ventricular cardiomyopathies, and arrhythmia syndromes, underlining the potential of AF as an early indicator of severe ventricular disease in younger individuals. Indeed, several recent studies have demonstrated meaningful yields of rare pathogenic variants among early-onset AF patients (∼4%-11%), most notably for cardiomyopathy genes in which rare variants are considered clinically actionable. Genetic testing thus presents a promising opportunity to identify monogenetic defects linked to AF and inherited cardiac conditions, such as cardiomyopathy, and may contribute to prognosis and management in early-onset AF patients. A first step towards recognizing this monogenic contribution was taken with the Class IIb recommendation for genetic testing in AF patients aged 45 years or younger by the 2023 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for AF. By identifying pathogenic genetic variants known to underlie inherited cardiomyopathies and arrhythmia syndromes, a personalized care pathway can be developed, encompassing more tailored screening, cascade testing, and potentially genotype-informed prognosis and preventive measures. However, this can only be ensured by frameworks that are developed and supported by all stakeholders. Ambiguity in test results such as variants of uncertain significance remain a major challenge and as many as ∼60% of people with early-onset AF might carry such variants. Patient education (including pretest counselling), training of genetic teams, selection of high-confidence genes, and careful reporting are strategies to mitigate this. Further challenges to implementation include financial barriers, insurability issues, workforce limitations, and the need for standardized definitions in a fast-moving field. Moreover, the prevailing genetic evidence largely rests on European descent populations, underscoring the need for diverse research cohorts and international collaboration. Embracing these challenges and the potential of genetic testing may improve AF care. However, further research-mechanistic, translational, and clinical-is urgently needed.

Characterization and natural history of patients with LMNA-related dilated cardiomyopathy in the phase 3 REALM-DCM trial

AIMS

LMNA-related dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a rare disease with an incompletely defined phenotype. The phase 3 REALM-DCM trial evaluated a potential disease-modifying therapy for LMNA-related DCM but was terminated due to futility without safety concern. This study utilized pooled data from REALM-DCM to descriptively characterize the phenotype and progression of LMNA-related DCM in a contemporary cohort of patients using common heart failure (HF) measures.

METHODS

REALM-DCM enrolled patients with stable LMNA-related DCM, an implanted cardioverter defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II/III HF symptoms.

RESULTS

Between 2018 and 2022, 77 patients took part in REALM-DCM. The median patient age was 53 years (range: 23-72), and 57% were male. Overall, 88% of patients had a pathogenic or likely pathogenic LMNA variant, and 12% had a variant of uncertain significance with a concordant phenotype. Among patients with confirmed sequencing, 55% had a missense variant. Atrial fibrillation was present in 60% of patients; 79% of all patients had NYHA Class II and 21% had NYHA Class III HF symptoms at baseline. Median (range) left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), 6 min walk test (6MWT) distance, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary (KCCQ-OS) score and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) concentration at baseline were 42% (23-62), 403 m (173-481), 67 (18-97) and 866 pg/mL (57-5248), respectively. LVEF, 6MWT distance and KCCQ-OS score were numerically lower in patients who had NYHA Class III versus II symptoms at baseline (LVEF: 38% vs. 43%; 6MWT distance: 326 vs. 413 m; and KCCQ-OS score: 43 vs. 70), whereas NT-proBNP concentration was higher (1216 vs. 799 pg/mL). Median follow-up was 73 weeks (range: 0.4-218; 73 in NYHA Class II and 75 in NYHA Class III). Patients displayed variable change from baseline in 6MWT, KCCQ-OS and NT-proBNP values during follow-up. Overall, 25% of patients experienced ventricular tachycardia, and 8% had ventricular fibrillation. Ten (13%) patients met the composite endpoint of worsening HF (adjudicated HF-related hospitalization or urgent care visit) or all-cause death; six had NYHA Class II and four had NYHA Class III at baseline. All-cause mortality occurred in 6 (8%) patients; three had NYHA Class II and three had NYHA Class III symptoms at baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings confirm the significant morbidity and mortality associated with LMNA-related DCM despite the standard of care management. Typical measures of HF, including 6MWT distance, KCCQ-OS score and NT-proBNP concentration, were variable but correlated with NYHA class. An unmet treatment need remains among patients with LMNA-related DCM. NCT03439514.

Risk Assessment and Personalized Treatment Options in Inherited Dilated Cardiomyopathies: A Narrative Review

Considering the worldwide impact of heart failure, it is crucial to develop approaches that can help us comprehend its root cause and make accurate predictions about its outcome. This is essential for lowering the suffering and death rates connected with this widespread illness. Cardiomyopathies frequently result from genetic factors, and the study of heart failure genetics is advancing quickly. Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is the most prevalent kind of cardiomyopathy, encompassing both genetic and nongenetic abnormalities. It is distinguished by the enlargement of the left ventricle or both ventricles, accompanied by reduced contractility. The discovery of the molecular origins and subsequent awareness of the molecular mechanism is broadening our knowledge of DCM development. Additionally, it emphasizes the complicated nature of DCM and the necessity to formulate several different strategies to address the diverse underlying factors contributing to this disease. Genetic variants that can be transmitted from one generation to another can be a significant contributor to causing family or sporadic hereditary DCM. Genetic variants also play a significant role in determining susceptibility for acquired triggers for DCM. The genetic causes of DCM can have a large range of phenotypic expressions. It is crucial to select patients who are most probable to gain advantages from genetic testing. The purpose of this research is to emphasize the significance of identifying genetic DCM, the relationships between genotype and phenotype, risk assessment, and personalized therapy for both those affected and their relatives. This approach is expected to gain importance once treatment is guided by genotype-specific advice and disease-modifying medications.

Cardiomyopathy and Sudden Cardiac Death: Bridging Clinical Practice with Cutting-Edge Research

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) prevention in cardiomyopathies such as hypertrophic (HCM), dilated (DCM), non-dilated left ventricular (NDLCM), and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) remains a crucial but complex clinical challenge, especially among younger populations. Accurate risk stratification is hampered by the variability in phenotypic expression and genetic heterogeneity inherent in these conditions. This article explores the multifaceted strategies for preventing SCD across a spectrum of cardiomyopathies and emphasizes the integration of clinical evaluations, genetic insights, and advanced imaging techniques such as cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in assessing SCD risks. Advanced imaging, particularly CMR, not only enhances our understanding of myocardial architecture but also serves as a cornerstone for identifying at-risk patients. The integration of new research findings with current practices is essential for advancing patient care and improving survival rates among those at the highest risk of SCD. This review calls for ongoing research to refine risk stratification models and enhance the predictive accuracy of both clinical and imaging techniques in the management of cardiomyopathies.

The role of genetic testing in management and prognosis of individuals with inherited cardiomyopathies

Inherited cardiomyopathies are a heterogeneous group of heart muscle conditions where disease classification has traditionally been based on clinical characteristics. However, this does not always align with genotype. While there are well described challenges of genetic testing, understanding the role of genotype in patient management is increasingly required. We take a gene-by-gene approach, reviewing current evidence for the role of genetic testing in guiding prognosis and management of individuals with inherited cardiomyopathies. In particular, focusing on causal variants in genes definitively associated with arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy, dilated cardiomyopathy, and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. This review identifies genotype-specific disease sub-groups with strong evidence supporting the use of genetics in clinical management and highlights that at present, the spectrum of clinical utility is not reflected in current guidelines. Of 13 guideline or expert consensus statements for management of cardiomyopathies, there are seven gene-specific therapeutic recommendations that have been published from four documents. Understanding how genotype influences phenotype provides evidence for the role of genetic testing for prognostic and therapeutic purposes, moving us closer to precision-medicine based care.

No beneficial use of the wearable cardioverter defibrillator among patients suffering from inherited and congenital heart disease: data from a European multicenter registry

Background

Data on the use of the wearable cardioverter defibrillator in patients suffering from inherited and congenital heart disease are limited. Consequently, evidence for guideline recommendations in this patient population is lacking.

Methods

In total 1,675 patients were included in a multicenter registry of eight European centers. In the present cohort, we included 18 patients suffering from congenital and inherited heart disease.

Results

Nine patients (50%) were male with a mean age of 41.3 ± 16.4 years. Four patients suffered from hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), four patients suffered from non-compaction cardiomyopathy (NCCM), two patients were diagnosed with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) and one patient suffered from muscular dystrophy of the limb-girdle type with cardiac involvement, secondary cardiomyopathy. Three patients presented with Brugada syndrome (BrS). One patient suffered from long-QT syndrome type 1 (LQTS1). Furthermore, two patients had congenital heart defects and one patient suffered from cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). There were no appropriate/inappropriate shocks with the WCD in this cohort. One patient had recurrent self-limiting sustained ventricular tachycardia during the wear time, but actively inhibited a shock and was hospitalized. The compliance rate in this cohort was 77.8% with a mean wear time of 45.3 ± 26.9 days with a mean follow-up time of 570 ± 734 days. 55.6% (10/18) of the patients received an ICD after WCD wear time.

Conclusions

This retrospective study of patients with inherited and congenital heart disease shows that WCD use is not beneficial in the majority of patients with inherited and congenital heart disease.

Impact of DCM-Causing Genetic Background on Long-Term Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

BACKGROUND

Patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, and complete left bundle branch block benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). However, a large heterogeneity of response to CRT is described. Several predictors of response to CRT have been identified, but the role of the underlying genetic background is still poorly explored.

OBJECTIVES

In the present study, the authors sought to define differences in LV remodeling and outcome prediction after CRT when stratifying patients according to the presence or absence of DCM-causing genetic background.

METHODS

From our center, 74 patients with DCM subjected to CRT and available genetic testing were retrospectively enrolled. Carriers of causative monogenic variants in validated DCM-causing genes, and/or with documented family history of DCM, were classified as affected by genetically determined disease (GEN+DCM) (n = 25). Alternatively, by idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (idDCM) (n = 49). The primary outcome was long-term LV remodeling and prevalence of super response to CRT (evaluated at 24-48 months after CRT); the secondary outcome was heart failure-related death/heart transplant/LV assist device.

RESULTS

GEN+DCM and idDCM patients were homogeneous at baseline with the exception of QRS duration, longer in idDCM. The median follow-up was 55 months. Long-term LV reverse remodeling and the prevalence of super response were significantly higher in the idDCM group (27% in idDCM vs 5% in GEN+DCM; P = 0.025). The heart failure-related death/heart transplant/LV assist device outcome occurred more frequently in patients with GEN+DCM (53% vs 24% in idDCM; P = 0.028).

CONCLUSIONS

Genotyping contributes to the risk stratification of patients with DCM undergoing CRT implantation in terms of LV remodeling and outcomes.

Missense and Non-Missense Lamin A/C Gene Mutations Are Similarly Associated with Major Arrhythmic Cardiac Events: A 20-Year Single-Centre Experience

Arrhythmic risk stratification in patients with Lamin A/C gene (LMNA)-related cardiomyopathy influences clinical decisions. An implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) should be considered in patients with an estimated 5-year risk of malignant ventricular arrhythmia (MVA) of ≥10%. The risk prediction score for MVA includes non-missense LMNA mutations, despite their role as an established risk factor for sudden cardiac death (SCD) has been questioned in several studies. The purpose of this study is to investigate cardiac features and find gene-phenotype correlations that would contribute to the evidence on the prognostic implications of non-missense vs. missense mutations in a cohort of LMNA mutant patients. An observational, prospective study was conducted in which 54 patients positive for a Lamin A/C mutation were enrolled, and 20 probands (37%) were included. The median age at first clinical manifestation was 41 (IQR 19) years. The median follow-up was 8 years (IQR 8). The type of LMNA gene mutation was distributed as follows: missense in 26 patients (48%), non-frameshift insertions in 16 (30%), frameshift deletions in 5 (9%), and nonsense in 7 (13%). Among the missense mutation carriers, two (8%) died and four (15%) were admitted onto the heart transplant list or underwent transplantation, with a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) rate of 35%. No statistically significant differences in MACE prevalence were identified according to the missense and non-missense mutation groups (p value = 0.847). Our data shift the spotlight on this considerable topic and could suggest that some missense mutations may deserve attention regarding SCD risk stratification in real-world clinical settings.

Troponin T Assessment Allows for Identification of Mutation Carriers among Young Relatives of Patients with LMNA-Related Dilated Cardiomyopathy

Background:LMNA-related dilated cardiomyopathy (LMNA-DCM) caused by mutations in the lamin A/C gene (LMNA) is one of the most common forms of hereditary DCM. Due to the high risk of mutation transmission to offspring and the high incidence of ventricular arrhythmia and sudden death even before the onset of heart failure symptoms, it is very important to identify LMNA-mutation carriers. However, many relatives of LMNA-DCM patients do not report to specialized centers for clinical or genetic screening. Therefore, an easily available tool to identify at-risk subjects is needed. Methods: We compared two cohorts of young, asymptomatic relatives of DCM patients who reported for screening: 29 LMNA mutation carriers and 43 individuals from the control group. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for potential indicators of mutation carriership status were analyzed. Results: PR interval, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hscTnT) serum levels were higher in the LMNA mutation carrier cohort. Neither group differed significantly with regard to creatinine concentration or left ventricular ejection fraction. The best mutation carriership discriminator was hscTnT level with an optimal cut-off value at 5.5 ng/L, for which sensitivity and specificity were 86% and 93%, respectively. The median hscTnT level was 11.0 ng/L in LMNA mutation carriers vs. <3.0 ng/L in the control group, p < 0.001. Conclusions: Wherever access to genetic testing is limited, LMNA mutation carriership status can be assessed reliably using the hscTnT assay. Among young symptomless relatives of LMNA-DCM patients, a hscTnT level >5.5 ng/L strongly suggests mutation carriers.

Assessment of ICD eligibility in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy patients: a position statement by the Task Force of the Dutch Society of Cardiology

International guidelines recommend implantation of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) below 35% despite optimal medical therapy and a life expectancy of more than 1 year with good functional status. We propose refinement of these recommendations in patients with NICM, with careful consideration of additional risk parameters for both arrhythmic and non-arrhythmic death. These additional parameters include late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and genetic testing for high-risk genetic variants to further assess arrhythmic risk, and age, comorbidities and sex for assessment of non-arrhythmic mortality risk. Moreover, several risk modifiers should be taken into account, such as concomitant arrhythmias that may affect LVEF (atrial fibrillation, premature ventricular beats) and resynchronisation therapy. Even though currently no valid cut-off values have been established, the proposed approach provides a more careful consideration of risks that may result in withholding ICD implantation in patients with low arrhythmic risk and substantial non-arrhythmic mortality risk.

Role of arrhythmic phenotype in prognostic stratification and management of dilated cardiomyopathy

AIMS

Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) with arrhythmic phenotype combines phenotypical aspects of DCM and predisposition to ventricular arrhythmias, typical of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. The definition of DCM with arrhythmic phenotype is not universally accepted, leading to uncertainty in the identification of high-risk patients. This study aimed to assess the prognostic impact of arrhythmic phenotype in risk stratification and the correlation of arrhythmic markers with high-risk arrhythmogenic gene variants in DCM patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this multicentre study, DCM patients with available genetic testing were analysed. The following arrhythmic markers, present at baseline or within 1 year of enrolment, were tested: unexplained syncope, rapid non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT), ≥1000 premature ventricular contractions/24 h or ≥50 ventricular couplets/24 h. LMNA, FLNC, RBM20, and desmosomal pathogenic or likely pathogenic gene variants were considered high-risk arrhythmogenic genes. The study endpoint was a composite of sudden cardiac death and major ventricular arrhythmias (SCD/MVA). We studied 742 DCM patients (45 ± 14 years, 34% female, 410 [55%] with left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] <35%). During a median follow-up of 6 years (interquartile range 1.6-12.1), unexplained syncope and NSVT were the only arrhythmic markers associated with SCD/MVA, and the combination of the two markers carried a significant additive risk of SCD/MVA, incremental to LVEF and New York Heart Association class. The probability of identifying an arrhythmogenic genotype rose from 8% to 30% if both early syncope and NSVT were present.

CONCLUSION

In DCM patients, the combination of early detected NSVT and unexplained syncope increases the risk of life-threatening arrhythmic outcomes and can aid the identification of carriers of malignant arrhythmogenic genotypes.

High prevalence and distinctive clinical features of LMNA-associated atrioventricular block in young patients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Atrioventricular block (AVB) is a degenerative disease and more commonly encountered in elderly patients, but unusual and often of unknown etiology in young patients. This study aimed to investigate the potential contributions of genetic variations to AVB of unknown reasons in young patients.

METHODS

We enrolled 41 patients aged <55 years with high-degree AVB of unknown etiology whose clinical and genetic data were collected.

RESULTS

Genetic variants were identified in 20 (20/41, 48.8%) patients, 11 (11/20, 55%) of whom had LMNA variants including 3 pathogenic (c.961C > T, c.936+1G > T and c.646C > T), 4 likely pathogenic (c.1489-1G > C, c.265C > A, c.1609-2A > G and c.1129C > T) and 3 of uncertain significance (c.1158-3C > G, c.776A > G and c.674G > T). Compared to those without LMNA variants, patients with LMNA variants demonstrated a later age at onset of AVB (41.45 ± 9.89 years vs 32.93 ± 12.07 years, P = .043), had more prevalent family history of cardiac events (81.8% vs 16.7%, P < .000), suffered more frequently atrial (81.8% vs 10.0%, P < .000) and ventricular (72.7% vs 10.0%, P < .000) arrhythmias, and were more significantly associated with enlargement of left atrium (39.91 ± 7.83 mm vs 34.30 ± 7.54 mm, P = .043) and left ventricle (53.27 ± 8.53 mm vs 47.77 ± 6.66 mm, P = .036).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings provide insights into the genetic etiology of AVB in young patients. LMNA variants are predominant in genotype positive patients and relevant to distinctive phenotypic properties.

Management of ventricular tachycardias: insights on centre settings, procedural workflow, endpoints, and implementation of guidelines-results from an EHRA survey

Ventricular tachycardia (VT), and its occurrence, is still one of the main reasons for sudden cardiac death and, therefore, for increased mortality and morbidity foremost in patients with structural heart [Kahle A-K, Jungen C, Alken F-A, Scherschel K, Willems S, Pürerfellner H et al. Management of ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy: contemporary armamentarium. Europace 2022;24:538-51]. Catheter ablation has become a safe and effective treatment option in patients with recurrent VT [Cronin EM, Bogun FM, Maury P, Peichl P, Chen M, Namboodiri N et al. 2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias. Heart Rhythm 2020;17:e2-154]. Previous and current guidelines provide guidance on indication for VT ablation and risk assessment and evaluation of underlying disease. However, no uniform recommendation is provided regarding procedural strategies, timing of ablation, and centre setting. Therefore, these specifics seem to differ largely, and recent data are sparse. This physician-based European Heart Rhythm Association survey aims to deliver insights on not only infrastructural settings but also procedural specifics, applied technologies, ablation strategies, and procedural endpoints. Therefore, these findings might deliver a real-world scenario of VT management and potentially are of guidance for other centres.

Natural History of Dilated Cardiomyopathy Due to c.77T>C (p.Val26Ala) in Emerin Protein

(1) Introduction: Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) mainly affects young individuals and is the main indication of heart transplantation. The variant c.77T>C (p.Val26Ala) of the gene coding for emerin (EMD) in chromosome Xq28 has been catalogued as a pathogenic variant for the development of DCM, exhibiting an X-linked inheritance pattern. (2) Methods: A retrospective study was conducted covering the period 2015-2023 in patients with DCM of genetic origin. The primary endpoint was patient age at onset of the first composite major cardiac event, in the form of a first episode of heart failure, malignant ventricular arrhythmia, or end-stage heart failure, according to the presence of truncating variant in titin gene (TTNtv) versus the p.Val26Ala mutation in the EMD protein. (3) Results: A total of 31 and 22 patients were included in the EMD group and TTNtv group, respectively. The primary endpoint was significantly higher in the EMD group, with a hazard ratio of 4.16 (95% confidence interval: 1.83-9.46; p = 0.001). At 55 years of age, all the patients in the EMD group had already presented heart failure, nine presented malignant ventricular arrhythmia (29%), and 13 required heart transplantation (42%). (4) Conclusions: DCM secondary to the c.77T>C (p.Val26Ala) mutation in the EMD gene is associated to an increased risk of major cardiac events compared to patients with DCM due to TTNtv, with a large proportion of transplanted patients in the fifth decade of life.

Proposed diagnostic criteria for arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy: European Task Force consensus report

Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) is a heart muscle disease characterized by prominent "non-ischemic" myocardial scarring predisposing to ventricular electrical instability. Diagnostic criteria for the original phenotype, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC), were first proposed in 1994 and revised in 2010 by an international Task Force (TF). A 2019 International Expert report appraised these previous criteria, finding good accuracy for diagnosis of ARVC but a lack of sensitivity for identification of the expanding phenotypic disease spectrum, which includes left-sided variants, i.e., biventricular (ABVC) and arrhythmogenic left ventricular cardiomyopathy (ALVC). The ARVC phenotype together with these left-sided variants are now more appropriately named ACM. The lack of diagnostic criteria for the left ventricular (LV) phenotype has resulted in clinical under-recognition of ACM patients over the 4 decades since the disease discovery. In 2020, the "Padua criteria" were proposed for both right- and left-sided ACM phenotypes. The presently proposed criteria represent a refinement of the 2020 Padua criteria and have been developed by an expert European TF to improve the diagnosis of ACM with upgraded and internationally recognized criteria. The growing recognition of the diagnostic role of CMR has led to the incorporation of myocardial tissue characterization findings for detection of myocardial scar using the late‑gadolinium enhancement (LGE) technique to more fully characterize right, biventricular and left disease variants, whether genetic or acquired (phenocopies), and to exclude other "non-scarring" myocardial disease. The "ring-like' pattern of myocardial LGE/scar is now a recognized diagnostic hallmark of ALVC. Additional diagnostic criteria regarding LV depolarization and repolarization ECG abnormalities and ventricular arrhythmias of LV origin are also provided. These proposed upgrading of diagnostic criteria represents a working framework to improve management of ACM patients.

Human Genetics of Cardiomyopathies

The identification of a disease-causing variant in a patient diagnosed with cardiomyopathy allows for presymptomatic testing in at risk relatives. Carriers of a pathogenic variant can subsequently be screened at intervals by a cardiologist to assess the risk for potentially life-threatening arrhythmias which can be life-saving. In addition, gene-specific recommendations for risk stratification and disease specific pharmacological options for therapy are beginning to emerge. The large variability in disease penetrance, symptoms, and prognosis, and in some families even in cardiomyopathy subtype, makes genetic counseling both of great importance and complicated.

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance as Risk Stratification Tool in Non-Ischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy Referred for Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy-State of Art and Perspectives

Non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a disease characterized by left ventricular dilation and systolic dysfunction. Patients with DCM are at higher risk for ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD). According to current international guidelines, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35% represents the main indication for prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation in patients with DCM. However, LVEF lacks sensitivity and specificity as a risk marker for SCD. It has been seen that the majority of patients with DCM do not actually benefit from the ICD implantation and, on the contrary, that many patients at risk of SCD are not identified as they have preserved or mildly depressed LVEF. Therefore, the use of LVEF as unique decision parameter does not maximize the benefit of ICD therapy. Multiple risk factors used in combination could likely predict SCD risk better than any single risk parameter. Several predictors have been proposed including genetic variants, electric indexes, and volumetric parameters of LV. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) can improve risk stratification thanks to tissue characterization sequences such as LGE sequence, parametric mapping, and feature tracking. This review evaluates the role of CMR as a risk stratification tool in DCM patients referred for ICD.

LMNA Cardiomyopathy: Important Considerations for the Heart Failure Clinician

BACKGROUND

A diagnosis of Lamin proteins A and C cardiomyopathy (LMNA-CM) not only impacts disease prognosis, but also leads to specific guideline-recommended treatment options for these patients. This etiology is fundamentally different from other genetic causes of dilated CM.

METHODS AND RESULTS

LMNA-CM often presents early in the third to fourth decades and there is an age-dependent penetrance of nearly 90% among those with a positive genotype for LMNA-CM. Oftentimes, electrical abnormalities with either conduction disturbances and/or either atrial or ventricular arrhythmias manifest before there is imaging evidence of left ventricular dysfunction. Given these subtle early findings, cardiac magnetic resonance provides helpful guidance regarding patterns of enhancement associated with LMNA-CM, often before there is significant left ventricular dilation and/or a decrease in the ejection fraction and could be used for further understanding of risk stratification and prognosis of asymptomatic genotype-positive individuals. Among symptomatic patients with LMNA-CM, approximately one-quarter of individuals progress to needing advanced heart failure therapies such as heart transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

In the era of precision medicine, increased recognition of clinical findings associated with LMNA-CM and increased detection by genetic testing among patients with idiopathic nonischemic CM is of increasing importance. Not only does a diagnosis of LMNA-CM have implications for management and risk stratification, but new gene-based therapies continue to be evaluated for this group. Clinicians must be aware not only of the general indications for genetic testing in arrhythmogenic and dilated cardiomyopathies and of when to suspect LMNA-CM, but also of the clinical trials underway targeted toward the different genetic cardiomyopathies.

Mapping and Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia in Inherited Left Ventricular Cardiomyopathies

Advances in the field of human genetics have led to an accumulating understanding of the genetic basis of distinct nonischemic cardiomyopathies associated with ventricular tachycardias (VTs) and sudden cardiac death. To date, there is an increasing proportion of patients with inherited cardiomyopathies requiring catheter ablation for VTs. This review provides an overview of disease-causing gene mutations frequently encountered and relevant for clinical electrophysiologists. Available data on VT ablation in patients with an inherited etiology and a phenotype of a nondilated left ventricular cardiomyopathy, dilated cardiomyopathy, or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy are summarized. VTs amenable to catheter ablation are related to nonischemic fibrosis. Recent insights into genotype-phenotype relations of subtype and location of fibrosis have important implications for treatment planning. Current strategies to delineate nonischemic fibrosis and related arrhythmogenic substrates using multimodal imaging, image integration, and electroanatomical mapping are provided. The ablation approach depends on substrate location and extension. Related procedural aspects including patient-tailored (enhanced) ablation strategies and outcomes are outlined. Challenging substrates for VT and the underlying inherited etiologies with a high risk for rapid progressive heart failure contribute to poor outcomes after catheter ablation. Electroanatomical data obtained during ablation may allow the identification of patients at particular risk who need to be considered for early work-up for left ventricular assist device implantation or heart transplantation.

Comprehensive review on gene mutations contributing to dilated cardiomyopathy

Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is one of the most common primary myocardial diseases. However, to this day, it remains an enigmatic cardiovascular disease (CVD) characterized by ventricular dilatation, which leads to myocardial contractile dysfunction. It is the most common cause of chronic congestive heart failure and the most frequent indication for heart transplantation in young individuals. Genetics and various other factors play significant roles in the progression of dilated cardiomyopathy, and variants in more than 50 genes have been associated with the disease. However, the etiology of a large number of cases remains elusive. Numerous studies have been conducted on the genetic causes of dilated cardiomyopathy. These genetic studies suggest that mutations in genes for fibronectin, cytoskeletal proteins, and myosin in cardiomyocytes play a key role in the development of DCM. In this review, we provide a comprehensive description of the genetic basis, mechanisms, and research advances in genes that have been strongly associated with DCM based on evidence-based medicine. We also emphasize the important role of gene sequencing in therapy for potential early diagnosis and improved clinical management of DCM.

The Uncertain Benefit from Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators in Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy: How to Guide Clinical Decision-Making?

Life-threatening dysrhythmias remain a significant cause of mortality in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM). Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) effectively reduce mortality in patients who have survived a life-threatening arrhythmic event. The evidence for survival benefit of primary prevention ICD for patients with high-risk NICM on guideline-directed medical therapy is not as robust, with efficacy questioned by recent studies. In this review, we summarize the data on the risk of life-threatening arrhythmias in NICM, the recommendations, and the evidence supporting the efficacy of primary prevention ICD, and highlight tools that may improve the identification of patients who could benefit from primary prevention ICD implantation.

State-of-the-art document on optimal contemporary management of cardiomyopathies

Cardiomyopathies represent significant contributors to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Over the past decades, a progress has occurred in characterization of the genetic background and major pathophysiological mechanisms, which has been incorporated into a more nuanced diagnostic approach and risk stratification. Furthermore, medications targeting core disease processes and/or their downstream adverse effects have been introduced for several cardiomyopathies. Combined with standard care and prevention of sudden cardiac death, these novel and emerging targeted therapies offer a possibility of improving the outcomes in several cardiomyopathies. Therefore, the aim of this document is to summarize practical approaches to the treatment of cardiomyopathies, which includes the evidence-based novel therapeutic concepts and established principles of care, tailored to the individual patient aetiology and clinical presentation of the cardiomyopathy. The scope of the document encompasses contemporary treatment of dilated, hypertrophic, restrictive and arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. It was based on an expert consensus reached at the Heart Failure Association online Workshop, held on 18 March 2021.

The Role of Genetics in the Management of Heart Failure Patients

Over the last decades, the relevance of genetics in cardiovascular diseases has expanded, especially in the context of cardiomyopathies. Its relevance extends to the management of patients diagnosed with heart failure (HF), given its capacity to provide invaluable insights into the etiology of cardiomyopathies and identify individuals at a heightened risk of poor outcomes. Notably, the identification of an etiological genetic variant necessitates a comprehensive evaluation of the family lineage of the affected patients. In the future, these genetic variants hold potential as therapeutic targets with the capability to modify gene expression. In this complex setting, collaboration among cardiologists, specifically those specializing in cardiomyopathies and HF, and geneticists becomes paramount to improving individual and family health outcomes, as well as therapeutic clinical results. This review is intended to offer geneticists and cardiologists an updated perspective on the value of genetic research in HF and its implications in clinical practice.

Cardiomyopathy in Asian Cohorts: Genetic and Epigenetic Insights

Previous studies on cardiomyopathies have been particularly valuable for clarifying pathological mechanisms in heart failure, an etiologically heterogeneous disease. In this review, we specifically focus on cardiomyopathies in Asia, where heart failure is particularly pertinent. There has been an increase in prevalence of cardiomyopathies in Asia, in sharp contrast with the decline observed in Western countries. Indeed, important disparities in cardiomyopathy incidence, clinical characteristics, and prognosis have been reported in Asian versus White cohorts. These have been accompanied by emerging descriptions of a distinct rare and common genetic basis for disease among Asian cardiomyopathy patients marked by an increased burden of variants with uncertain significance, reclassification of variants deemed pathogenic based on evidence from predominantly White cohorts, and the discovery of Asian-specific cardiomyopathy-associated loci with underappreciated pathogenicity under conventional classification criteria. Findings from epigenetic studies of heart failure, particularly DNA methylation studies, have complemented genetic findings in accounting for the phenotypic variability in cardiomyopathy. Though extremely limited, findings from Asian ancestry-focused DNA methylation studies of cardiomyopathy have shown potential to contribute to general understanding of cardiomyopathy pathophysiology by proposing disease and cause-relevant pathophysiological mechanisms. We discuss the value of multiomics study designs incorporating genetic, methylation, and transcriptomic information for future DNA methylation studies in Asian cardiomyopathy cohorts to yield Asian ancestry-specific insights that will improve risk stratification in the Asian population.

Phenotyping heart failure by genetics and associated conditions

Heart failure is a highly heterogeneous disease, and genetic testing may allow phenotypic distinctions that are incremental to those obtainable from imaging. Advances in genetic testing have allowed for the identification of deleterious variants in patients with specific heart failure phenotypes (dilated cardiomyopathy, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy), and many of these have specific treatment implications. The diagnostic yield of genetic testing in heart failure is modest, and many rare variants are associated with incomplete penetrance and variable expressivity. Environmental factors and co-morbidities have a large role in the heterogeneity of the heart failure phenotype. Future endeavours should concentrate on the cumulative impact of genetic polymorphisms in the development of heart failure.

The Genetic Evaluation of Dilated Cardiomyopathy

Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a common cause of heart failure and is the primary indication for heart transplantation. A genetic etiology can be found in 20-35% of patients with DCM, especially in those with a family history of cardiomyopathy or sudden cardiac death at an early age. With advancements in genome sequencing, the understanding of genotype-phenotype relationships in DCM has expanded with over 60 genes implicated in the disease. Subsequently, these findings have increased adoption of genetic testing in the management of DCM, which has allowed for improved risk stratification and identification of at risk family members. In this review, we discuss the genetic evaluation of DCM with a focus on practical genetic testing considerations, genotype-phenotype associations, and insights into upcoming personalized therapies.

Genetic Risk Stratification in Arrhythmogenic Left Ventricular Cardiomyopathy

Arrhythmogenic left ventricular cardiomyopathy is characterized by early malignant ventricular arrhythmia associated with varying degrees and times of onset of left ventricular dysfunction. Variants in numerous genes have been associated with this phenotype. Here, the authors review the literature on recent cohort studies of patients with variants in desmoplakin, lamin A/C, filamin-C, phospholamban, RBM20, TMEM43, and selected channelopathy genes also associated with structural disease. Unlike traditional sudden cardiac death risk assessment in nonischemic cardiomyopathy, left ventricular systolic function is an insensitive predictor of risk in patients with these genetic diagnoses.

Diagnosis and management of patients with left ventricular hypertrophy: Role of multimodality cardiac imaging. A scientific statement of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology

Left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy consists in an increased LV wall thickness. LV hypertrophy can be either secondary, in response to pressure or volume overload, or primary, i.e. not explained solely by abnormal loading conditions. Primary LV hypertrophy may be due to gene mutations or to the deposition or storage of abnormal substances in the extracellular spaces or within the cardiomyocytes (more appropriately defined as pseudohypertrophy). LV hypertrophy is often a precursor to subsequent development of heart failure. Cardiovascular imaging plays a key role in the assessment of LV hypertrophy. Echocardiography, the first-line imaging technique, allows a comprehensive assessment of LV systolic and diastolic function. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance provides added value as it measures accurately LV and right ventricular volumes and mass and characterizes myocardial tissue properties, which may provide important clues to the final diagnosis. Additionally, scintigraphy with bone tracers is included in the diagnostic algorithm of cardiac amyloidosis. Once the diagnosis is established, imaging findings may help predict future disease evolution and inform therapy and follow-up. This consensus document by the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology provides an overview of the role of different cardiac imaging techniques for the differential diagnosis and management of patients with LV hypertrophy.

Relationship Between Results of Pathological Evaluation of Endomyocardial Biopsy and Echocardiographic Indices in Patients With Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy

Background: Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is a useful modality in diagnosing the origin of cardiomyopathy and the condition of the impaired myocardium. However, the usefulness of obtaining an EMB from the right and left ventricles (RV and LV, respectively), and its associations with echocardiographic parameters, have not been explored. Methods and Results: Ninety-five consecutive patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy excluding myocarditis who underwent EMB between July 2017 and May 2019 were studied. Seventy-nine RV and 93 LV biopsy specimens were pathologically analyzed. The relationships among echocardiographic data before EMB and pathologically measured cardiomyocyte diameter (CMD) and interstitial fibrosis (IF) were evaluated. CMD in both LV and RV specimens correlated with echocardiographic LV morphology, but only CMD in the LV was significantly correlated with cardiac function evaluation, including LV ejection fraction, E' and E/E'. In contrast, there were no significant correlations between IF in either the LV or RV and any echocardiographic parameters measured. Furthermore, CMD of both ventricles was significantly correlated with B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) concentration at EMB, whereas IF of the LV was barely related and IF of the RV was not significantly correlated with BNP concentrations. Conclusions: Pathologically evaluated CMD of EMB specimens of the LV may be more related to functional parameters for heart failure status and LV geometry on echocardiographic examination, than IF.

Genetic Abnormalities of the Sinoatrial Node and Atrioventricular Conduction

The peculiar electrophysiological properties of the sinoatrial node and the cardiac conduction system are key components of the normal physiology of cardiac impulse generation and propagation. Multiple genes and transcription factors and metabolic proteins are involved in their development and regulation. In this review, we have summarized the genetic underlying causes, key clinical findings, and the latest available clinical evidence. We will discuss clinical diagnosis and management of the genetic conditions associated with conduction disorders that are more prevalent in clinical practice, for this reason, very rare genetic diseases presenting sinus node or cardiac conduction system abnormalities are not discussed.

Lamin A/C Ablation Restricted to Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells, Cardiomyocytes, and Cardiac Fibroblasts Causes Cardiac and Vascular Dysfunction

Mutations in the LMNA gene (encoding lamin A/C proteins) cause several human cardiac diseases, including dilated cardiomyopathies (LMNA-DCM). The main clinical risks in LMNA-DCM patients are sudden cardiac death and progressive left ventricular ejection fraction deterioration, and therefore most human and animal studies have sought to define the mechanisms through which LMNA mutations provoke cardiac alterations, with a particular focus on cardiomyocytes. To investigate if LMNA mutations also cause vascular alterations that might contribute to the etiopathogenesis of LMNA-DCM, we generated and characterized Lmna^flox/floxSM22αCre mice, which constitutively lack lamin A/C in vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs), cardiac fibroblasts, and cardiomyocytes. Like mice with whole body or cardiomyocyte-specific lamin A/C ablation, Lmna^flox/floxSM22αCre mice recapitulated the main hallmarks of human LMNA-DCM, including ventricular systolic dysfunction, cardiac conduction defects, cardiac fibrosis, and premature death. These alterations were associated with elevated expression of total and phosphorylated (active) Smad3 and cleaved (active) caspase 3 in the heart. Lmna^flox/floxSM22αCre mice also exhibited perivascular fibrosis in the coronary arteries and a switch of aortic VSMCs from the 'contractile' to the 'synthetic' phenotype. Ex vivo wire myography in isolated aortic rings revealed impaired maximum contraction capacity and an altered response to vasoconstrictor and vasodilator agents in Lmna^flox/floxSM22αCre mice. To our knowledge, our results provide the first evidence of phenotypic alterations in VSMCs that might contribute significantly to the pathophysiology of some forms of LMNA-DCM. Future work addressing the mechanisms underlying vascular defects in LMNA-DCM may open new therapeutic avenues for these diseases.

Lamin A/C cardiomyopathy presenting as high-grade atrioventricular (AV) block, atrial fibrillation, heart failure and ventricular tachycardia in a single-family cluster

Mutations in the lamin A/C (LMNA) gene have been associated with both cardiac and skeletal muscle abnormalities. Cardiac manifestations in LMNA cardiomyopathy have a variable age of onset and range from mild to life-threatening. We describe a case series illustrating manifestations of LMNA mutation in a single family with an extensive history of cardiac disease, including sudden cardiac death, and the implications for diagnosis and management. This discussion highlights potential presentations of LMNA mutations and the importance of genetic testing in patients with a family history of conduction abnormalities.

The pivotal role of ECG in cardiomyopathies

Cardiomyopathies are a heterogeneous group of pathologies characterized by structural and functional alterations of the heart. Recent technological advances in cardiovascular imaging offer an opportunity for deep phenotypic and etiological definition. Electrocardiogram (ECG) is the first-line diagnostic tool in the evaluation of both asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals. Some electrocardiographic signs are pathognomonic or fall within validated diagnostic criteria of individual cardiomyopathy such as the inverted T waves in right precordial leads (V1-V3) or beyond in individuals with complete pubertal development in the absence of complete right bundle branch block for the diagnosis of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy of the right ventricle (ARVC) or the presence of low voltages typically seen in more than 60% of patients with amyloidosis. Most other electrocardiographic findings such as the presence of depolarization changes including QRS fragmentation, the presence of epsilon wave, the presence of reduced or increased voltages as well as alterations in the repolarization phase including the negative T waves in the lateral leads, or the profound inversion of the T waves or downsloping of the ST tract are more non-specific signs which can however raise the clinical suspicion of cardiomyopathy in order to initiate a diagnostic procedure especially using imaging techniques for diagnostic confirmation. Such electrocardiographic alterations not only have a counterpart in imaging investigations such as evidence of late gadolinium enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging, but may also have an important prognostic value once a definite diagnosis has been made. In addition, the presence of electrical stimulus conduction disturbances or advanced atrioventricular blocks that can be seen especially in conditions such as cardiac amyloidosis or sarcoidosis, or the presence of left bundle branch block or posterior fascicular block in dilated or arrhythmogenic left ventricular cardiomyopathies are recognized as a possible expression of advanced pathology. Similarly, the presence of ventricular arrhythmias with typical patterns such as non-sustained or sustained ventricular tachycardia of LBBB morphology in ARVC or non-sustained or sustained ventricular tachycardia with an RBBB morphology (excluding the "fascicular pattern") in arrhythmogenic left ventricle cardiomyopathy could have a significant impact on the course of each disease. It is therefore clear that a learned and careful interpretation of ECG features can raise suspicion of the presence of a cardiomyopathy, identify diagnostic "red flags" useful for orienting the diagnosis toward specific forms, and provide useful tools for risk stratification. The purpose of this review is to emphasize the important role of the ECG in the diagnostic workup, describing the main ECG findings of different cardiomyopathies.

Targeting unfolded protein response reverts ER stress and ER Ca2+ homeostasis in cardiomyocytes expressing the pathogenic variant of Lamin A/C R321X

BACKGROUND

We previously demonstrated that an Italian family affected by a severe dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) with history of sudden deaths at young age, carried a mutation in the Lmna gene encoding for a truncated variant of the Lamin A/C protein (LMNA), R321X. When expressed in heterologous systems, such variant accumulates into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), inducing the activation of the PERK-CHOP pathway of the unfolded protein response (UPR), ER dysfunction and increased rate of apoptosis. The aim of this work was to analyze whether targeting the UPR can be used to revert the ER dysfunction associated with LMNA R321X expression in HL-1 cardiac cells.

METHODS

HL-1 cardiomyocytes stably expressing LMNA R321X were used to assess the ability of 3 different drugs targeting the UPR, salubrinal, guanabenz and empagliflozin to rescue ER stress and dysfunction. In these cells, the state of activation of both the UPR and the pro-apoptotic pathway were analyzed monitoring the expression levels of phospho-PERK, phospho-eIF2α, ATF4, CHOP and PARP-CL. In addition, we measured ER-dependent intracellular Ca²⁺ dynamics as indicator of proper ER functionality.

RESULTS

We found that salubrinal and guanabenz increased the expression levels of phospho-eIF2α and downregulated the apoptosis markers CHOP and PARP-CL in LMNA R321X-cardiomyocytes, maintaining the so-called adaptive UPR. These drugs also restored ER ability to handle Ca²⁺ in these cardiomyocytes. Interestingly, we found that empagliflozin downregulated the apoptosis markers CHOP and PARP-CL shutting down the UPR itself through the inhibition of PERK phosphorylation in LMNA R321X-cardiomyocytes. Furthermore, upon empagliflozin treatment, ER homeostasis, in terms of ER ability to store and release intracellular Ca²⁺ was also restored in these cardiomyocytes.

CONCLUSIONS

We provided evidence that the different drugs, although interfering with different steps of the UPR, were able to counteract pro-apoptotic processes and to preserve the ER homeostasis in R321X LMNA-cardiomyocytes. Of note, two of the tested drugs, guanabenz and empagliflozin, are already used in the clinical practice, thus providing preclinical evidence for ready-to-use therapies in patients affected by the LMNA R321X associated cardiomyocytes.

Personalized Management of Sudden Death Risk in Primary Cardiomyopathies: From Clinical Evaluation and Multimodality Imaging to Ablation and Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implant

Sudden cardiac death represents the leading cause of death worldwide; although the majority of sudden deaths occur in an elderly population with coronary artery disease, some occur in young and otherwise healthy individuals, as is the case of cardiomyopathies. The aim of the present review is to provide a stepwise hierarchical approach for the global sudden death risk estimation in primary cardiomyopathies. Each individual risk factor is analyzed for its contribution to the overall risk of sudden death for each specific cardiomyopathy as well as across all primary myocardial diseases. This stepwise hierarchical and personalized approach starts from the clinical evaluation, subsequently passes through the role of electrocardiographic monitoring and multimodality imaging, and finally concludes with genetic evaluation and electro-anatomical mapping. In fact, the sudden cardiac death risk assessment in cardiomyopathies depends on a multiparametric approach. Moreover, current indications for ventricular arrhythmia ablation and defibrillator implantation are discussed.

Clinical, Genetic, and Histological Characterization of Patients with Rare Neuromuscular and Mitochondrial Diseases Presenting with Different Cardiomyopathy Phenotypes

Cardiomyopathies are mostly determined by genetic mutations affecting either cardiac muscle cell structure or function. Nevertheless, cardiomyopathies may also be part of complex clinical phenotypes in the spectrum of neuromuscular (NMD) or mitochondrial diseases (MD). The aim of this study is to describe the clinical, molecular, and histological characteristics of a consecutive cohort of patients with cardiomyopathy associated with NMDs or MDs referred to a tertiary cardiomyopathy clinic. Consecutive patients with a definitive diagnosis of NMDs and MDs presenting with a cardiomyopathy phenotype were described. Seven patients were identified: two patients with ACAD9 deficiency (Patient 1 carried the c.1240C>T (p.Arg414Cys) homozygous variant in ACAD9; Patient 2 carried the c.1240C>T (p.Arg414Cys) and the c.1646G>A (p.Ar549Gln) variants in ACAD9); two patients with MYH7-related myopathy (Patient 3 carried the c.1325G>A (p.Arg442His) variant in MYH7; Patient 4 carried the c.1357C>T (p.Arg453Cys) variant in MYH7); one patient with desminopathy (Patient 5 carried the c.46C>T (p.Arg16Cys) variant in DES); two patients with mitochondrial myopathy (Patient 6 carried the m.3243A>G variant in MT-TL1; Patient 7 carried the c.253G>A (p.Gly85Arg) and the c.1055C>T (p.Thr352Met) variants in MTO1). All patients underwent a comprehensive cardiovascular and neuromuscular evaluation, including muscle biopsy and genetic testing. This study described the clinical phenotype of rare NMDs and MDs presenting as cardiomyopathies. A multidisciplinary evaluation, combined with genetic testing, plays a main role in the diagnosis of these rare diseases, and provides information about clinical expectations, and guides management.

Characterization of cardiac involvement in children with LMNA-related muscular dystrophy

Introduction: LMNA-related muscular dystrophy is a rare entity that produce "laminopathies" such as Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy (EDMD), limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 1B (LGMD1B), and LMNA-related congenital muscular dystrophy (L-CMD). Heart failure, malignant arrhythmias, and sudden death may occur. No consensus exists on cardiovascular management in pediatric laminopathies. The aim was to perform an exhaustive cardiologic follow-up in pediatric patients diagnosed with LMNA-related muscular dystrophy. Methods: Baseline cardiac work-up consisted of clinical assessment, transthoracic Doppler echocardiography, 12-lead electrocardiogram, electrophysiological study, and implantation of a long-term implantable cardiac loop recorder (ILR). Results: We enrolled twenty-eight pediatric patients diagnosed with EDMD (13 patients), L-CMD (11 patients), LGMD1B (2 patients), and LMNA-related mild weakness (2 patients). Follow-up showed dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) in six patients and malignant arrhythmias in five (four concomitant with DCM) detected by the ILR that required implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation. Malignant arrhythmias were detected in 20% of our cohort and early-onset EDMD showed worse cardiac prognosis. Discussion: Patients diagnosed with early-onset EDMD are at higher risk of DCM, while potentially life-threatening arrhythmias without DCM appear earlier in L-CMD patients. Early onset neurologic symptoms could be related with worse cardiac prognosis. Specific clinical guidelines for children are needed to prevent sudden death.

Timing of cardioverter-defibrillator implantation in patients with cardiac laminopathies-External validation of the LMNA-risk ventricular tachyarrhythmia calculator

BACKGROUND

LMNA genotype-positive patients have high risk of experiencing life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTAs). The LMNA-risk VTA calculator published in 2019 has not been externally validated.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to validate the LMNA-risk VTA calculator.

METHODS

We included LMNA genotype-positive patients without previous VTAs from 2 large Scandinavian centers. Patients underwent electrocardiography, 24-hour Holter monitoring, and echocardiographic examinations at baseline and repeatedly during follow-up. Validation of the LMNA-risk VTA calculator was performed using Harrell's C-statistic derived from multivariable Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

We included 118 patients (age 37 years [IQR 27-49 years]; 39 [33%] probands; 65 [55%] women; 100 [85%] with non-missense LMNA variants). Twenty-three patients (19%) experienced VTA during 6.1 years (interquartile range 3.0-9.1 years) follow-up, resulting in 3.0% (95% confidence interval 2.0%-4.5%) yearly incidence rate. Atrioventricular block and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction were independent predictors of VTAs, while nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, male sex, and non-missense LMNA variants were not. The LMNA-risk VTA calculator showed 83% sensitivity and 26% specificity for identifying patients with VTAs during the coming 5 years, and a Harrell's C-statistic of 0.85, when applying ≥7% predicted 5-year VTA risk as threshold. The sensitivity increased to 100% when reevaluating risk at the time of last consultation before VTA. The calculator overestimated arrhythmic risk in patients with mild and moderate phenotype, particularly in men.

CONCLUSION

Validation of the LMNA-risk VTA calculator showed high sensitivity for subsequent VTAs, but overestimated arrhythmic risk when using ≥7% predicted 5-year risk as threshold. Frequent reevaluation of risk was necessary to maintain the sensitivity of the model.

Epigenetics in LMNA-Related Cardiomyopathy

Mutations in the gene for lamin A/C (LMNA) cause a diverse range of diseases known as laminopathies. LMNA-related cardiomyopathy is a common inherited heart disease and is highly penetrant with a poor prognosis. In the past years, numerous investigations using mouse models, stem cell technologies, and patient samples have characterized the phenotypic diversity caused by specific LMNA variants and contributed to understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of heart disease. As a component of the nuclear envelope, LMNA regulates nuclear mechanostability and function, chromatin organization, and gene transcription. This review will focus on the different cardiomyopathies caused by LMNA mutations, address the role of LMNA in chromatin organization and gene regulation, and discuss how these processes go awry in heart disease.

Inherited myopathy plus: Double-trouble from rare neuromuscular disorders

A rare disorder in the USA is one that affects <200,000 people, making inherited myopathies rare diseases. Increasing access to genetic testing has been instrumental for the diagnosis of inherited myopathies. Genetic findings, however, require clinical correlation due to variable phenotype, polygenic etiology of certain inherited disorders, and possible co-existing independent neuromuscular disorders. We searched the Mayo Clinic Rochester medical record (2004-2020) to identify adult patients carrying pathogenic variants or likely pathogenic variants in genes causative of myopathies and having a coexisting independent neuromuscular disorder classified as rare at https://rarediseases.info.nih.gov/. One additional patient was identified at Nationwide Children's hospital. Clinical and laboratory findings were reviewed. We identified 14 patients from 13 families fulfilling search criteria. Seven patients had a "double-trouble" inherited myopathy; two had an inherited myopathy with coexistent idiopathic myositis; three had an inherited myopathy with coexisting rare neuromuscular disorder of neurogenic type; a female DMD carrier had co-existing distal spinal muscular atrophy, which was featuring the clinical phenotype; and a patient with a MYH7 pathogenic variant had Sandhoff disease causing motor neuron disease. These cases highlight the relevance of correlating genetic findings, even when diagnostic, with clinical features, to allow precise diagnosis, optimal care, and accurate prognosis.

Primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator use in non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy based on arrhythmic risk stratification and left ventricular reverse remodeling prediction

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) and significant ventricular arrhythmias in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) have been markedly reduced over the last couple of decades as a result of the advances in pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment. Primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) plays an important role in the treatment of patients at risk of SCD caused by ventricular arrhythmias. However, the arrhythmic risk stratification in patients with DCM remains extremely challenging, and the decision for primary prevention ICD implantation based on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) solely appears to be insufficient. This review provides an update on current evidence for primary prevention ICD implantation, arrhythmic risk stratification, and left ventricular reverse remodeling (LVRR) prediction in patients with DCM in addition to most recent guideline recommendations for primary prevention ICD implantation in DCM patients and a proposed multiparametric algorithm based on arrhythmic risk stratification and left ventricular reverse remodeling (LVRR) prediction to better identify patients who are likely to benefit from primary prevention ICD.