Foreseeing Super-Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Sex-specific Evaluation of Ventricular Ejection Fraction and End-Systolic Volume Applied to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) can decrease the risk of heart failure (HF) events in relatively asymptomatic patients with a reduced ejection fraction (EF) and wide QRS complex. However, individual response to this type of therapy varies widely. Often based on either EF increase or end-systolic volume (ESV) decrease as criterion, a subgroup of super-responders has been described. Therefore, it is important to determine factors that can predict a favorable response and identify those patients who may benefit from CRT. With this goal in mind we explored the possible role of ESV.To improve insight in ventricular pump function we previously introduced the volume regulation graph (VRG), relating ESV to end-diastolic volume (EDV). An individual patient is uniquely defined by the prevailing working point in the volume domain. The traditional metric EF can be graphically derived for each working point. The nonlinear association between EF and ESV is given by EF = 1 + γ {ESV / (δ - ESV)}, with empirical constants γ and δ. The impact of CRT super-responders on EF can be evaluated, taking into account sex-specific ESV values. Based on available regression equations we modeled the impact on EF (as percent points) resulting from CRT-induced fractional ESV changes expressed as % of baseline ESV. Our analysis confirms clinical findings, indicating that CRT super-responders are likely to be women, and clarify why a specific reduction of ESV cannot be directly translated into EF improvement. We propose that the EF as CRT criterion should be abandoned and replaced by sex-specific ESV evaluations.Clinical Relevance- Response to CRT should be evaluated in a sex-specific manner. The smaller heart size in women has implications for the interpretation of percentwise reductions of ESV and their translation into an associated increase of EF.

Reverse of left ventricular remodeling in heart failure patients with left bundle branch area pacing: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has recently become a promising option for the near-natural restoration of electrical activation. However, the clinical relevance of therapeutic effects in individuals with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and dyssynchrony remains unknown.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception until June 2022. Data from each study was combined using a random-effects model, the generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird, to calculate standard mean differences and pooled incidence ratio, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

A total of 772 HFrEF patients were analyzed from 15 observational studies per protocol. The success rate of LBBAP implantation was 94.8% (95% CI 89.9-99.6, I2 = 79.4%), which was strongly correlated with shortening QRS duration after LBBAP implantation, with a mean difference of -48.10 ms (95% CI -60.16 to -36.05, I2 = 96.7%). Over a period of 6-12 months of follow-up, pacing parameters were stable over time. There were significant improvements in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), and left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) with mean difference of 16.38% (95% CI 13.13-19.63, I2 = 90.2%), -46.23 ml (95% CI -63.17 to -29.29, I2 = 86.82%), -7.21 mm (95% CI -9.71 to -4.71, I2 = 84.6%), and -44.52 ml (95% CI -64.40 to -24.64, I2 = 85.9%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

LBBAP was associated with improvements in both cardiac function and electrical synchrony. The benefits of LBBAP in individuals with HFrEF and dyssynchrony should be further validated by randomized studies.

Conduction system pacing is superior to biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure: Insights from the pooled clinical studies

Background: The effects of conduction system pacing (CSP) compared with conventional biventricular pacing (BVP) on heart function in patients with heart failure remain elusive. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane's Library and Web of science databases were searched up to 1 October 2022 for pertinent controlled studies. Random or fixed-effect model were used to synthesize the clinical outcomes. Subgroup analysis was performed to screen the potential confounding factors. Results: Fifteen studies including 1,347 patients were enrolled. Compared with BVP, CSP was significantly associated with shortened QRS duration [WMD -22.51 ms; p = 0.000], improved left ventricular ejection fraction [WMD 5.53%; p = 0.000], improved NYHA grade [WMD -0.42; p = 0.000], higher response rate and lower heart failure rehospitalization rate. CSP resulted in better clinical outcomes in higher male proportion group than lower one compared with BVP. No significant differences of clinical outcomes were observed between left bundle branch area pacing (LBBaP) and his bundle pacing (HBP) except the pacing threshold. The pacing threshold of LBBaP was significantly lower than those in BVP and HBP. Conclusion: This study suggests that CSP might be superior to conventional BVP for HF patients. In a higher male proportion group, CSP may be associated with more benefits than BVP. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022355991; Identifier: CRD42022355991.

Left bundle branch pacing versus biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces heart failure (HF) hospitalization and all-cause mortality in HF patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB). Biventricular pacing (BVP) is the gold standard for achieving CRT, but about 30%-40% of patients do not respond to BVP-CRT. Recent studies showed that left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) provided remarkable results in CRT. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis aiming to compare LBBP-CRT versus BVP-CRT in HF patients.

METHODS

We systematically searched the electronic databases for studies published from inception to December 29, 2022 and focusing on LBBP-CRT versus BVP-CRT in HF patients. The primary endpoint was HF hospitalization. The effect size was estimated using a random-effect model as Risk Ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD).

RESULTS

Ten studies enrolling 1063 patients met the inclusion criteria. Compared to BVP-CRT, LBBP-CRT led to significant reduction in HF hospitalization [7.9% vs.14.5%; RR: 0.60 (95%CI: 0.39-0.93); p = .02], QRSd [MD: 30.26 ms (95%CI: 26.68-33.84); p < .00001] and pacing threshold [MD: -0.60 (95%CI: -0.71 to -0.48); p < .00001] at follow up. Furthermore, LBBP-CRT improved LVEF [MD: 5.78% (95%CI: 4.78-6.77); p < .00001], the rate of responder [88.5% vs.72.5%; RR: 1.19 (95%CI: 1.07-1.32); p = .002] and super-responder [60.8% vs. 36.5%; RR: 1.56 (95%CI: 1.27-1.91); p < .0001] patients and the NYHA class [MD: -0.42 (95%CI: -0.71 to -0.14); p < .00001] compared to BVP-CRT.

CONCLUSION

In HF patients, LBBP-CRT was superior to BVP-CRT in reducing HF hospitalization. Further significant benefits occurred within the LBBP-CRT group in terms of QRSd, LVEF, pacing thresholds, NYHA class and the rate of responder and super-responder patients.

Abnormal Conduction-Induced Cardiomyopathy: JACC Review Topic of the Week

Nonischemic cardiomyopathies are a frequent occurrence. The understanding of the mechanism(s) and triggers of these cardiomyopathies have led to improvement and even recovery of left ventricular function. Although chronic right ventricular pacing-induced cardiomyopathy has been recognized for many years, left bundle branch block and pre-excitation have been recently identified as potential reversible causes of cardiomyopathy. These cardiomyopathies share a similar abnormal ventricular propagation that can be recognized by a wide QRS duration with left bundle branch block pattern; thus, we coined the term abnormal conduction-induced cardiomyopathies. Such abnormal propagation results in an abnormal contractility that can only be recognized by cardiac imaging as ventricular dyssynchrony. Appropriate diagnosis and treatment will not only lead to improved left ventricular ejection fraction and functional class, but may also reduce morbidity and mortality. This review presents an update of the mechanisms, prevalence, incidence, and risk factors, as well as their diagnosis and management, while highlighting current gaps of knowledge.

Predicting factors of echocardiographic super-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy

PURPOSE

To investigate the clinical and echocardiographic predictors of echocardiographic super-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data from 97 patients, who underwent CRT and were followed up (median time = 20.33 months). All had left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%, New-York-Heart-Association class 3 or 4, and Q wave, R wave and S wave (QRS) duration >120 ms. Time-to-peak systolic velocity was measured for individual LV segments by tissue Doppler imaging prior to CRT. Two-dimensional echocardiography was carried out before and at follow-up, and ≥12.5% increase in LVEF was defined as super-response.

RESULTS

From the 97 patients, 23 (23.7%) were super-responders. Super-responders were more frequently female (52.2% vs. 24.3%, respectively; p value = 0.012). Among super-responders, the mean of LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes were significantly lower. According to dyssynchrony indices, time delay between anteroseptal and posterior wall and SD of all LV segments timing showed significantly higher values in super-responders. By multivariate analysis, LV end-systolic volume and anteroseptal-to-posterior wall delay remained independently associated with echocardiographic super-response to CRT.

CONCLUSION

About one-fourth of our patients with CRT were super-responder in that they had ≥12.5% increase in LVEF by echocardiography. Among all the clinical and echocardiographic measures, only lower LV end-systolic volume and higher anteroseptal-to-posterior wall delay predicted super-response.

Device-evaluated autonomic nervous function for predicting ventricular arrhythmias and all-cause mortality in patients who underwent cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator

Introduction: Autonomic nervous system (ANS) function quantified by heart rate variability (HRV) was associated with long-term prognosis, but it was rarely used in the evaluation of patients with heart failure, especially those with cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D) implantation. This study aimed to describe the changes in ANS function among patients who underwent CRT-D with remote home monitoring function, and explore predictive value of HRV for ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTAs) and all-cause mortality. Method: Patients who underwent CRT-D implantation were included. Device-measured all-day HR, night-time HR, and HRV (measured by the standard deviation of the atrial-atrial sensed intervals) were used to quantify ANS function. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were fitted to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of VTAs or all-cause mortality in relation to ANS function at baseline and 6 months post-implantation. The cutoff value was determined using restrictive cubic splines. Multivariable logistic regression was further established to determine factors influencing postoperative HRV. Results: A total of 170 patients treated with CRT-D were eligible for analysis. During a median follow-up period of 50.8 months, 61 patients died and 69 patients experienced at least one spontaneous episode of VTAs. At 6 months after CRT implantation, 114 patients showed improvement in HRV, increasing from 66.4 ± 19.4 ms to 76.7 ± 21.2 ms. The postoperative HRV was associated with both all-cause mortality (HRs: 0.983; 95% CI: 0.968 to 0.998, p = 0.012) and VTAs (HRs: 0.973; 95% CI: 0.954 to 0.993, p = 0.008), and the relative risk would significantly increase when the postoperative HRV lower than 75 ms. After adjusting for basic ANS function and possible influencing factors, patients without diabetes (p = 0.018) and with higher daily physical activity (p = 0.041) could maintain higher postoperative HRV after CRT implantation. Conclusion: More than two-thirds of heart failure patients showed improvement in ANS function following CRT treatment. However, patients with diabetes and low daily physical activity levels have difficulty maintaining a higher postoperative HRV, which is associated with a worse clinical outcome.

Conduction system pacing: promoting the physiology to prevent heart failure

Cardiac conduction system pacing provides physiological ventricular activation by directly stimulating the conduction system. This review describes the two types of conduction system pacing: His bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle area pacing (LBAP). The most significant advantage of HB pacing is that it can provide a regular, narrow QRS; however, the disadvantages are challenging implantation and a high risk of re-intervention due to lead dislodgement and the development of high pacing threshold. LBAP provides optimum physiological activation of the left ventricle by engaging the left bundle/fascicular fibers. LBAP is more physiological than traditional RV apical pacing and could be an attractive alternative to conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The advantages of LBAP are a relatively more straightforward implantation technique than HBP, better lead stability and pacing thresholds. HBP and LBAP are more physiological than right ventricular pacing and may be used instead of conventional pacemakers. Both HBP and LBBP are being investigated as alternatives to conventional CRT.

Changes of repolarization parameters after left bundle branch area pacing and the association with echocardiographic response in heart failure patients

Background: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has become a safe and effective option for heart failure (HF) patients indicated for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and/or ventricular pacing, yet the response rate was only 70%. Repolarization parameters were demonstrated to be associated with cardiac mechanics and systolic function. This study aimed to investigate the effects of LBBAP on repolarization parameters and the potential association between those parameters and echocardiographic response.

Methods and results: A total of 59 HF patients undergoing successful LBBAP were consecutively included. QTc, Tpeak-Tend (TpTe), and TpTe/QTc were measured before and after the implantation. The results turned out that the dispersion of ventricular repolarization (DVR) improved after LBBAP among the total population. Although trends of repolarization parameters varied according to different QRS configurations at baseline, the post-implant parameters showed no significant difference between groups. The association between repolarization parameters and LBBAP response was then evaluated among patients with wide QRS. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that post-implant TpTe was the independent predictor of LBBAP response (p < 0.05). Receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated an area under the curve of 0.77 (95% CI, 0.60–0.93) with a cutoff value of 81.2 ms (p < 0.01). Patients with post-implant TpTe<81.2 ms had a significantly higher rate of echocardiographic response (93.3 vs. 44.4%, p < 0.01). Further subgroup analysis indicated that the predictive value of post-implant TpTe for LBBAP response was more significant in non-left bundle branch block (LBBB) patients than in LBBB patients.

Conclusion: LBBAP improved DVR significantly in HF patients. Post-implant TpTe was associated with the echocardiographic response after LBBAP among patients with wide QRS, especially for non-LBBB patients.

Clinical outcomes of conduction system pacing compared to biventricular pacing in patients requiring cardiac resynchronization therapy

BACKGROUND

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacing (BVP) is well-established therapy in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and bundle branch block or indication for pacing. Conduction system pacing (CSP) using His-bundle pacing (HBP) or left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has been shown to be a safe and more physiological alternative to BVP.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes between CSP and BVP among patients undergoing CRT.

METHODS

This observational study included consecutive patients with LVEF ≤35% and class I or II indications for CRT who underwent successful BVP or CSP at 2 major health care systems. The primary outcome was the composite endpoint of time to death or heart failure hospitalization (HFH). Secondary outcomes included subgroup analysis in left bundle branch block as well as individual endpoints of death and HFH.

RESULTS

A total of 477 patients (32% female) met inclusion criteria (BVP 219; CSP 258 [HBP 87, LBBAP 171]). Mean age was 72 ± 12 years, and mean LVEF was 26% ± 6%. Comorbidities included hypertension 70%, diabetes mellitus 45%, and coronary artery disease 52%. Paced QRS duration in CSP was significantly narrower than BVP (133 ± 21 ms vs 153 ± 24 ms; P <.001). LVEF improved in both groups during mean follow-up of 27 ± 12 months and was greater after CSP compared to BVP (39.7% ± 13% vs 33.1% ± 12%; P <.001). Primary outcome of death or HFH was significantly lower with CSP vs BVP (28.3% vs 38.4%; hazard ratio 1.52; 95% confidence interval 1.082-2.087; P = .013).

CONCLUSION

CSP improved clinical outcomes compared to BVP in this large cohort of patients with indications for CRT.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy via left bundle branch pacing vs. optimized biventricular pacing with adaptive algorithm in heart failure with left bundle branch block: a prospective, multi-centre, observational study

AIMS

The purpose of our study was to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) via left bundle branch pacing (LBBP-CRT) compared with optimized biventricular pacing (BVP) with adaptive algorithm (BVP-aCRT) in heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% (HFrEF) and left bundle branch block (LBBB).

METHODS AND RESULTS

One hundred patients with HFrEF and LBBB undergoing CRT were prospectively enrolled in a non-randomized fashion and divided into two groups (LBBP-CRT, n = 49; BVP-aCRT, n = 51) in four centres. Implant characteristics and echocardiographic parameters were accessed at baseline and during 6-month and 1-year follow-up. The success rate for LBBP-CRT and BVP-aCRT was 98.00% and 91.07%. Fused LBBP had the greatest reduced QRS duration compared to BVP-aCRT (126.54 ± 11.67 vs. 102.61 ± 9.66 ms, P < 0.001). Higher absolute left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and △LVEF was also achieved in LBBP-CRT than BVP-aCRT at 6-month (47.58 ± 12.02% vs. 41.24 ± 10.56%, P = 0.008; 18.52 ± 13.19% vs. 12.89 ± 9.73%, P = 0.020) and 1-year follow-up (49.10 ± 10.43% vs. 43.62 ± 11.33%, P = 0.021; 20.90 ± 11.80% vs. 15.20 ± 9.98%, P = 0.015, P = 0.015). There was no significant difference in response rate between two groups while higher super-response rate was observed in LBBP-CRT as compared to BVP-aCRT at 6 months (53.06% vs. 36.59%, P = 0.016) and 12 months (61.22% vs. 39.22%, P = 0.028) during follow-up. The pacing threshold was lower in LBBP-CRT at implant and during 1-year follow-up (both P < 0.001). Procedure-related complications and adverse clinical outcomes including heart failure hospitalization and mortality were not significantly different in two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The feasibility and efficacy of LBBP-CRT demonstrated better electromechanical resynchronization and higher clinical and echocardiographic response, especially higher super-response than BVP-aCRT in HFrEF with LBBB.

Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing In Patients with Heart Failure and Right Bundle Branch Block: Results From International LBBAP Collaborative-Study Group

Background

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) using biventricular pacing has limited efficacy in patients with heart failure (HF) and right bundle branch block (RBBB). Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a novel physiologic pacing option.

Objective

The aim of the study was to assess the feasibility and outcomes of LBBAP in HF patients with RBBB and reduced left ventricular systolic function, and indication for CRT or ventricular pacing.

Methods

LBBAP was attempted in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50%, RBBB, HF, and indications for CRT or ventricular pacing. Procedural, pacing, and electrocardiographic parameters; clinical response (no HF hospitalization and improvement in NYHA class); and echocardiographic response (≥5% increase in ejection fraction) to LBBAP were assessed.

Results

LBBAP was attempted in 121 patients and successful in 107 (88%). Patient characteristics included age 74 ± 12 years, female 25%, ischemic cardiomyopathy 49%, and ejection fraction 35% ± 9%. QRS axis at baseline was normal in 24%, left axis 63%, right axis 13%. LBBAP threshold and R-wave amplitudes were 0.8 ± 0.3 V @ 0.5 ms and 10 ± 9 mV at implant and remained stable during mean follow-up of 13 ± 8 months. LBBAP resulted in narrowing of QRS duration (156 ± 20 ms to 150 ± 24 ms (P = .01) with R-wave peak times in V₆ of 85 ± 16 ms. LVEF improved from 35% ± 9% to 43% ± 12% (P < .01). Clinical and echocardiographic response was observed in 60% and 61% of patients, respectively. Female sex and reduction in QRS duration with LBBAP were predictive of echocardiographic response and super-response.

Conclusion

LBBAP is a feasible alternative to deliver CRT or physiologic ventricular pacing in patients with RBBB, HF, and LV dysfunction.

Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Results From the International LBBAP Collaborative Study Group

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) in patients eligible for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in an international, multicenter, collaborative study.

BACKGROUND

CRT using biventricular pacing is effective in patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block (LBBB). LBBAP has been reported as an alternative option for CRT.

METHODS

LBBAP was attempted in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50% and indications for CRT or pacing. Procedural outcomes, left bundle branch capture, New York Heart Association functional class, heart failure hospitalization, echocardiographic data, and lead complications were recorded. Clinical (no heart failure hospitalization and improvement in New York Heart Association functional class) and echocardiographic responses (≥5% improvement in LVEF) were assessed.

RESULTS

LBBAP was attempted in 325 patients, and CRT was successfully achieved in 277 (85%) (mean age 71 ± 12 years, 35% women, ischemic cardiomyopathy in 44%). QRS configuration at baseline was LBBB in 39% and non-LBBB in 46%. Procedure and fluoroscopy duration were 105 ± 54 and 19 ± 15 min, respectively. LBBAP threshold and R-wave amplitudes were 0.6 ± 0.3 V at 0.5 ms and 10.6 ± 6 mV at implantation and remained stable during mean follow-up of 6 ± 5 months. LBBAP resulted in significant QRS narrowing from 152 ± 32 to 137 ± 22 ms (p < 0.01). LVEF improved from 33 ± 10% to 44 ± 11% (p < 0.01). Clinical and echocardiographic responses were observed in 72% and 73% of patients, respectively. Baseline LBBB (odds ratio: 3.96; 95% confidence interval: 1.64 to 9.26; p < 0.01) and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (odds ratio: 0.62; 95% confidence interval: 0.49 to 0.79; p < 0.01) were independent predictors of echocardiographic response.

CONCLUSIONS

LBBAP is feasible and safe and provides an alternative option for CRT. LBBAP provides remarkably low and stable pacing thresholds and was associated with improved clinical and echocardiographic outcomes.

Patient-specific heart simulation can identify non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy

To identify non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), various biomarkers have been proposed, but these attempts have not been successful to date. We tested the clinical applicability of computer simulation of CRT for the identification of non-responders. We used the multi-scale heart simulator “UT-Heart,” which can reproduce the electrophysiology and mechanics of the heart based on a molecular model of the excitation–contraction mechanism. Patient-specific heart models were created for eight heart failure patients who were treated with CRT, based on the clinical data recorded before treatment. Using these heart models, bi-ventricular pacing simulations were performed at multiple pacing sites adopted in clinical practice. Improvement in pumping function measured by the relative change of maximum positive derivative of left ventricular pressure (%ΔdP/dt_max) was compared with the clinical outcome. The operators of the simulation were blinded to the clinical outcome. In six patients, the relative reduction in end-systolic volume exceeded 15% in the follow-up echocardiogram at 3 months (responders) and the remaining two patients were judged as non-responders. The simulated %ΔdP/dt_max at the best lead position could identify responders and non-responders successfully. With further refinement of the model, patient-specific simulation could be a useful tool for identifying non-responders to CRT.

Left bundle branch area pacing delivery of cardiac resynchronization therapy and comparison with biventricular pacing

AIMS

This multicentre observational study aimed to prospectively assess the efficacy of left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) and compare the 6-month outcomes between LBBAP and biventricular pacing (BVP).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Consecutive patients with LBBB and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35% were prospectively recruited if they had undergone LBBAP as a primary or rescue strategy from three separate centres from March to December 2018. Patients who received BVP in 2018 were retrospectively selected by using 2 to 1 propensity score matching to minimize bias. Implant characteristics and echocardiographic parameters were assessed during the 6-month follow-up. LBBAP procedure succeeded in 81.1% (30/37) of patients, with selective LBBAP in 10 patients, and 3 of 20 patients combined non-selective LBBAP and LV lead pacing for further QRS narrowing. LBBAP resulted in significant QRS narrowing (from 178.2 ± 18.8 to 121.8 ± 10.8 ms, P < 0.001, paced QRS duration ≤ 130 ms in 27 patients) and improved LVEF (from 28.8 ± 4.5% to 44.3 ± 8.7%, P < 0.001) during the 6-month follow-up. The comparison between 27 patients with LBBAP alone and 54 of 130 matching patients with BVP showed that LBBAP delivered a greater reduction in the QRSd (58.0 vs. 12.5 ms, P < 0.001), a greater increase in LVEF (15.6% vs. 7.0%, P < 0.001), and greater echocardiographic (88.9% vs. 66.7%, P = 0.035) and super response (44.4% vs. 16.7%, P = 0.007) to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

LBBAP could deliver cardiac resynchronization therapy in most patients with heart failure and LBBB, and might be a promising alternative resynchronization approach to BVP.

Left Bundle Branch Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Nonrandomized On-Treatment Comparison With His Bundle Pacing and Biventricular Pacing

BACKGROUND

Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is a novel method for delivering cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We compared on-treatment outcomes with His bundle pacing (HBP) and biventricular pacing (BVP) in this nonrandomized observational study.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 40% and typical left bundle branch block (LBBB) referred for CRT received BVP, HBP, or LBBP. QRS duration, pacing threshold, LVEF, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class were assessed.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-seven patients were recruited: 49 HBP, 32 LBBP, and 54 BVP; 2 did not receive CRT. The majority of patients had nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Mean paced QRS duration was 100.7 ± 15.3 ms, 110.8 ± 11.1 ms, and 135.4 ± 20.2 ms during HBP, LBBP, and BVP, respectively. HBP and LBBP demonstrated a similar absolute increase (Δ) in LVEF (+23.9% vs +24%, P = 0.977) and rate of normalized final LVEF (74.4% vs 70.0%, P = 0.881) at 1-year follow-up. This was significantly higher than in the BVP group (Δ LVEF +16.7% and 44.9% rate of normalized final LVEF, P < 0.005). HBP and LBBP also demonstrated greater improvements in NYHA class compared with BVP. LBBP was associated with higher R-wave amplitude (11.2 ± 5.1 mV vs 3.8 ± 1.9 mV, P < 0.001) and lower pacing threshold (0.49 ± 0.13 V/0.5 ms vs 1.35 ± 0.73 V/0.5 ms, P < 0.001) compared with HBP.

CONCLUSION

LBBP appears to be a promising method for delivering CRT. We observed similar improvements in symptoms and LV function with LBBP and HBP. These improvements were significantly greater than those seen in patients treated with BVP in this nonrandomized study. These promising findings justify further investigation with randomized trials.

Heart Failure Duration Combined with Left Atrial Dimension Predicts Super-Response and Long-Term Prognosis in Patients with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Implantation

Background

Response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) varies significantly among patients. This study aimed to identify baseline characteristics that could predict super-response to CRT and to evaluate the long-term prognosis in super-responders.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the data of 73 consecutive patients who received CRT. Patients were considered as super-responders after 6-month follow-up when NYHA class reduction to I or II combined with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 50% was observed. Patients were divided into super-responders group and non-super-responders group. All-cause mortality or hospitalization for heart failure (HF) was referred to the combined end point.

Results

17 (23.3%) patients were super-responders. HF duration, left atrial dimension (LAD), and left bundle branch block (LBBB) were independent predictors of super-response to CRT. The combination of HF duration and LAD could provide more robust prediction of super-response than standalone HF duration (0.899 versus 0.789, Z = 2.207, P = 0.027) or standalone LAD (0.899 versus 0.775, Z = 2.487, P = 0.013). super-responders had excellent LV reverse remodeling. The cumulative incidences of combined end point were significantly lower in the super-responders group, LAD ≤ 42mm group, and combination of HF duration ≤ 48 months and LAD ≤ 42mm group. LBBB remained associated with a lowered risk of the combined end point (HR: 0.19, 95% CI: 0.07-0.57, P = 0.003), whereas LAD was associated with a raised risk of the combined end point (HR: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.02-1.17, P = 0.014).

Conclusions

HF duration, LAD, and LBBB independently predicted super-response. The combination of HF duration and LAD makes more robust prediction of CRT super-response. Super-responders had excellent LV reverse remodeling and decreased the incidences of the combined end point. LBBB and LAD were independently associated with the combined end point.

Incidence and predictors of super-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy

OBJECTIVES

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has significantly improved management of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). A significant number of patients have a dramatic response and have been termed "super-responders". The characteristics of this subset of patients in Indian and Asian population have not been well studied. In this study, we sought to assess the prevalence and clinical characteristics of this cohort of patients.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study involving patients undergoing CRT. Changes in ejection fraction and LVESV at the end of one year of follow-up following device implantation were assessed, and patients were stratified into non-responders, responders, and super-responders. Responders had a 15-29% decrease in LVESV while super-responders had a >30% decrease in LVESV.

RESULTS

Of the 74 patients who had undergone CRT-P/CRT-D implantation, 16 patients did not have echocardiograms at the end of one year of follow-up and were excluded from the analysis. Thus, 58 patients were enrolled for analysis. We identified 16 patients (27.6%) to be super-responders, 26 patients (44.8%) to be responders, and 16 patients (27.6%) to be non-responders. Factors associated with a super-response were a diagnosis of dilated cardiomyopathy as against ischemic cardiomyopathy (93.7% vs 6.3%; p - 0.01), prior right ventricular (RV) apical pacing (25% vs 2.4%; p - 0.02) and absence of a prior history of myocardial infarction (MI) (0% vs 33.3%; p - 0.02).

CONCLUSION

In our study, 27.6% of patients were super-responders, and a diagnosis of dilated cardiomyopathy, absence of a prior history of MI and prior RV apical pacing predicted a super-response to CRT.

His-bundle Pacing to Left Bundle Branch Pacing: Evolution of His-Purkinje Conduction System Pacing

His-bundle pacing (HBP) constitutes an excellent alternative to right ventricular pacing. Recently, several studies have reported on the success and efficacy of HBP in patients with left bundle branch block requiring cardiac resynchronization therapy. Nonetheless, HBP may not always be feasible due to high capture thresholds or disease in the distal His bundle. The present report discusses the utility and feasibility of pacing in the left bundle branch area located distal to the site of conduction block.

Echocardiographic markers of dyssynchrony as predictors of super-response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy - a pilot study

Background

Some patients with congestive heart failure have greater improvement of cardiac remodelling after cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) and they are identified as super-responders (SRs). It remains unclear if echocardiographic markers of dyssynchrony could accuratelly predict super-response to CRT. The aim of this study is to evaluate potential echocardiographic predictors associated with super-response to CRT.

Methods

Fifthy nine CRT patients (mean age 52.9 ± 9.0 years, 88% men) with congestive heart failure (54% ischaemic and 46% non-ischaemic aetiology) II-IV NYHA functional class were enrolled. To assess mechanical dyssynchrony we evaluated interventricular mechanical delay, the maximum delay between peak systolic velocities of the septal and posterior walls of left ventricle, duration of left ventricular pre-ejection period (LVPEP), left ventricular and interventricular dyssynchrony by tissue Doppler imaging and systolic dyssynchrony index by 3D echocardiography. After six months the patients were assessed for response and classified as SRs (reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) ≥30%, n = 20) and non-SRs (reduction in LVESV < 30%, n = 39) and baseline data were analyzed to identify the predictors.

Results

Both groups demonstrated significant improvement in NYHA functional class, increase in left ventricular ejection fraction and reduction in LVESV. All parameters of mechanical dyssynchrony at baseline were significantly higher in SR group. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that LVPEP (HR 1.031; 95% CI 1.007–1.055; p = 0.011) was an independent predictor for CRT super-response. In ROC curve analysis LVPEP with a cut-off value of 147 ms demonstrated 73.7% sensitivity and 75% specificity (AUC = 0.753; p = 0.002) for the prediction of super-response to CRT.

Conclusion

Greater mechanical dyssynchrony is associated with super-response to CRT in patients with congestive heart failure. It is probable that an LVPEP > 147 ms can be used as independent predictor of super-response.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device replacement considerations: upgrade or downgrade? A complex decision in the current clinical setting

There are limited data about the management of patients presenting for elective generator replacements in the setting of previously implanted cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices that are nearing end-of-life. The individual patient's clinical status and concomitant morbidities may evolve so that considerations may include not only replacement of the pulse generator, but also potentially changing the type of device [e.g. downgrading CRT-defibrillator (CRT-D) to CRT-pacemaker (CRT-P) or ICD or upgrading of CRT-P to CRT-D]. Moreover, the clinical evidence for CRT-D/CRT-P implantation may change over time, with ongoing research and availability of new trial data. In this review we discuss the ethical, clinical and financial implications related to CRT generator replacements and the need for additional clinical trials to better understand which patients should undergo CRT device downgrading or upgrading at the time of battery depletion.

Myocardial Recovery in Patients Receiving Contemporary Left Ventricular Assist Devices: Results From the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS)

BACKGROUND

Time course and predictors of myocardial recovery on contemporary left ventricular assist device support are poorly defined because of limited number of recovery patients at any implanting center. This study sought to investigate myocardial recovery using multicenter data from the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Thirteen thousand four hundred fifty-four adult patients were studied. Device explant rates for myocardial recovery were 0.9% at 1-year, 1.9% at 2-year, and 3.1% at 3-year follow-up. Independent predictors of device explantation for recovery were age <50 years (odds ratio [OR] 2.5), nonischemic etiology (OR 5.4), time since initial diagnosis <2 years (OR 3.4), suboptimal heart failure therapy before implant (OR 2.2), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter <6.5 cm (OR 1.7), pulmonary systolic artery pressure <50 mm Hg (OR 2.0), blood urea nitrogen <30 mg/dL (OR 3.3), and axial-flow device (OR 7.6). Patients with myocarditis (7.7%), postpartum cardiomyopathy (4.4%), and adriamycin-induced cardiomyopathy (4.1%) had highest rates of device explantation for recovery. Use of neurohormonal blockers on left ventricular assist device support was significantly higher in patients who were explanted for recovery. Importantly, 9% of all left ventricular assist device patients who were not explanted for recovery have demonstrated substantial improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (partial recovery) and had remarkable overlap in clinical characteristic profile compared with patients who were explanted for recovery (complete recovery). Complete and partial recovery rates have declined in parallel with recent changes observed in device indications and technology.

CONCLUSIONS

Myocardial recovery is a spectrum of improvement rather than a binary clinical end point. One in every 10 left ventricular assist device patients demonstrates partial or complete myocardial recovery and should be targeted for functional assessment and optimization.

Predictors and long-term outcome of super-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy

BACKGROUND

The level of improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in super-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is exceptional. However, the long-term prognosis remains unknown in a large population.

HYPOTHESIS

Whether super-responders haven good long-term outcomes.

METHODS

We registered 347 patients with primary CRT-D indication. Super-response was defined by LVEF >50% at follow-up echocardiogram. Best-subset regression analysis identified predictors of super-response. Endpoints were major adverse cardiac events (MACE; eg, all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization, cardiac death, and appropriate ICD therapy).

RESULTS

Fifty-six (16%) patients with LVEF >50% were classified as super-responders. Female sex (OR: 3.06, 95% CI: 1.54-6.05), nonischemic etiology (OR: 2.70, 95% CI: 1.29-5.68), higher LVEF at baseline (OR: 1.07, 95% CI: 1.02-1.13), and wider QRS duration (OR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.04-1.32) were predictors of super-response. Cumulative incidence of MACE at a median of 5.3 years was 18% in super-responders, 22% in responders, and 51% in nonresponders (P < 0.001). None of super responders died from cardiac death, compared to 9% of responders and 25% of non-responders (P < 0.001). None of super-responders experienced appropriate ICD therapy, compared with 10% of responders and 21% of non-responders (P < 0.001). In super-responders, the adjusted hazard ratio was 0.37 (95% CI: 0.19-0.73) for MACE and 0.44 (95% CI: 0.20-0.95) for total mortality, compared with non-responders.

CONCLUSIONS

Female sex, non-ischemic etiology, higher baseline LVEF, and wider QRS duration were independently associated with super-response. Super-response was associated with persistent excellent prognosis regarding survival and appropriate ICD therapy during long-term follow-up.

What We Can Learn from "Super-responders"

This review discusses the state of the art of knowledge to help decision making in patients who are candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and to analyze the long-term total and cardiac mortality, sudden death, and CRT with a defibrillator intervention rate, as well as the evolution of echocardiographic parameters in patients with a left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction of greater than 50% after CRT implantation. Owing to normalization of LV function in super-responders, the need for a persistent defibrillator backup is also considered.

Canadian Cardiovascular Society guidelines on the use of cardiac resynchronization therapy: implementation

Recent studies have provided the impetus to update the recommendations for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). This article provides guidance on the implementation of CRT and is intended to serve as a framework for the implementation of CRT within the Canadian health care system and beyond. These guidelines were developed through a critical evaluation of the existing literature, and expert consensus. The panel unanimously adopted each recommendation. The 9 recommendations relate to patient selection in the presence of comorbidities, delivery and optimization of CRT, and resources required to deliver this therapy. The strength of evidence was weighed, taking full consideration of any risk of bias, and any imprecision, inconsistency, and indirectness of the available data. The strength of each recommendation and the quality of evidence were adjudicated. Trade-offs between desirable and undesirable consequences of alternative management strategies were considered, as were values, preferences, and resource availability. These guidelines were externally reviewed by experts, modified based on those reviews, and will be updated as new knowledge is acquired.

Long-term outcome of 'super-responder' patients to cardiac resynchronization therapy

AIMS

To evaluate the long-term changes of clinical and echocardiographic parameters, the incidence of cardiac events and parameters associated with late cardiac events in 'super-responders' to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with [CRT defibrillator (CRT-D)] or without defibrillator back-up.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In all consecutive patients treated with CRT in two Italian centres (Trieste and Udine) with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤0.35 at implantation (Timp) and LVEF > 0.50 1 and/or 2 years (Tnorm) after implantation, the long-term outcome and the evolution of echocardiographic parameters were assessed; factors associated with a higher risk of cardiac events, defined as hospitalization or death for heart failure (HF), sudden death, or CRT-D appropriate interventions, were also analysed. Among the 259 patients evaluated, 62 (24%) had LVEF ≥ 0.50 at Tnorm (n = 44 with at 1 year, n = 18 at 2 years). During a mean follow-up of 68 ± 30 months, one cardiac death (for HF) and eight cardiovascular events (two hospitalization for HF and six appropriate CRT-D interventions) occurred. At the last echo evaluation (Tfup) performed 51 ± 26 months after Timp, LVEF was <0.50 in five patients (>0.45 in four of them). At univariable analysis, only LV end-systolic volume evaluated at Tfup was associated with a higher risk of cardiac events during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

In 'super-responders' to CRT long-term outcome is excellent. However, cardiac events, mainly CRT-D appropriate interventions, can occur despite the persistence of LVEF > 0.50. Early identification of these patients is still an unsolved issue.